Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kleinman 1982
Kleinman 1982
ABSTRACT• The author reviews conceptual and empirical issues regarding the interaction
of neurasthenia, somatization and depression in Chinese culture and in the West• The
historical background of neurasthenia and its current status are discussed, along with the
epidemiology and phenomenology of somatization and depression. Findings are presented
from a combined clinical and anthropological field study of 100 patients with neurasthenia
in the Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic at the Hunan Medical College. Eighty-seven of these
patients made the DSM-III criteria of Major Depressive Disorder; diagnoses of anxiety dis-
orders were also frequent. Forty-four" patients were suffering from chronic pain syndromes
previously undiagnosed, and cases of culture-bound syndromes also were detected. For
three-quarters of patients the social significances and uses of their illness behavior chiefly
related to work. Although from the researchers' perspective 70% of patients with Major
Depressive Disorder experienced snbstartlial improvement and 87% some improvement in
symptoms when treated with antidepressant medication, fewer experienced decreased help
seeking, and a much smaller number perceived less social impairment and improvement
in illness problems (the psychosocial accompaniment of disease including maladaptive
coping and work, family and school problems)• These t'mdings are drawn on to advance
medical anthropology and cultural psychiatry theory and research regarding somatization in
Chinese culture, the United States and cross culturally. The author concludes that though
neurasthenia can be understood in several distinctive ways, it is most clinically useful to
regard it as bioculturally patterned illness experience (a special form of somatization)
related to either depression and other diseases or to culturally sanctioned idioms of distress
and psychosocial coping.
"I visited (1956) in Peitaiho a hospital for mental cases. But everyone was reluctant to call it
a mental hospital: it was 'for cadres who are overtired'. The only mental illness which was
acceptable was neurasthenia, and throughout the years innumerable were the cases of
neurasthenia, transient or permanent, that I would hear about• There is something very
Victorian about this coyness; one thinks immediately of the word 'decline' which covered
so many cases of tuberculosis and cancer in the nineteenth century."
illness.*
* Mao confessed to Liang Shuming, at Yanan in 1938, that now and then he fell victim
to nervous exhaustion (neurasthenia)."
BACKGROUND
Neurasthenia
Except for pointing out that this diagnosis was rarely used in the recent past,
DSM-III's authors enigmatically refer readers who search the Index for this term
to read about Dysthyrnic Disorder (i.e., Neurotic Depression) without explaining
why. DSM-I, published in 1952, did not include it in the section on "Disorders
of Psychogenic Origin or Without Clearly Defined Physical Cause or Structural
Change in the Brain," but referred to it as psychophysiologic nervous system
reaction, while DSM-II, published in 1968, labeled it Neurasthenic Neurosis and
stated
•.. those that cannot be confirmed to have any organic basis. The patient has fairly good
powers of self-understanding, and normally does not confuse subjectivepathological experi-
ence and fantasy with external facts. Although their behavior can he greatly influenced,
they still inwardly keep within the limits tolerated by society, and their personality also
remains intact.
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 123
These authors proceed to define neurasthenia in this light and end up with a
statement that save for its strong emphasis on abnormal neurological functioning
and failure to mention anhedonia is rather in keeping with the ICD-9 definition.
Depression
• .hopelessness is the key factor in the genesis of clinical depression and loss is probably
.
the most likely cause of profound hopelessness. But it is not just loss of a particular 'object'
that has to be dealt with so much as its implications for our ability to find satisfactory
alternatives (p. 234).
The immediate response to loss of an important source of positive value is likely to be a
sense of hopelessness, accompanied by a gamut of feelings, ranging from despair, depression,
and shame to anger. Feelings of hopelessness will not always be restricted to the provoking
incident - large or small. It may lead to thoughts about the hopelessness of one's life in
general. It is such generalization of hopelessness that we believe forms the central core of a
depressive disorder (p. 235).
depression (Depue 1979; Klerman MS). That biological, psychological and social
processes are interrelated in depression has become, at least for some clinical
researchers and epidemiologists, an accepted truth (Akiskal and McKenney
1973), but it is not known how this relationship is organized and sustained.
Nonetheless, the evidence is compelling that, in addition to biological change
and psychological experience, social relations and meanings are implicated in
the onset, process and consequences of depressive illness. The crude Cartesian
dichotomy between reactive (psychosocial) and endogenous (biological) depres-
sion, which persists in spite of psychiatrists' awareness of its inadequacy, is
scientifically untenable. Thus far, however, there has not been significant cross-
cultural research on the social factors and their sociosomatic correlates; we
simply do not know how they apply to Chinese depressives.
Since the writings of Hippocrates in the West, melancholia (depression) was
viewed as organically based in an excess of black bile (Simon 1978: 229). This
cause was passed down well into modem times through Galen's influential
writings (Jackson 1969), and while the humoral theory eventually gave way to
chemical and mechanical causal attributions, the somatopsychic or physiological
psychology orientation continued to dominate the medical literature and lay
views (Jackson 1980). By the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the long
association of hypochondriasis with melancholia was beginning to break apart,
and Willis and later Sydenham separated the former off as an independent
disorder. But clearly medical men for sometime in the West had associated
depression with the hypochondriacal amplification of somatic complaints and
continued to relate it to melancholy as an affect if not melancholia as a disease.
Hypochondriacal melancholy was associated with problems involving the spleen
and later with 'pathologial vapors'. Hence contemporary biological views of
depression and somatic preoccupation are underpinned by a long Western
medical tradition of viewing mental problems as organically based that related
both of these syndromes and, as we have already seen, neurasthenia as well to
somatic pathology. It is only in very recent times in the West, beginning perhaps
in the Victorian period and accelerating after Freud, that psychological and
psychosomatic views of these disorders have become popular both in medical
and lay circles. Attempts at integrating biological, psychological and social
features of depression in clinical research are only a few decades old. Apprecia-
tion among practicing psychiatrists of the importance of social and cultural
determinants in depression is still poor. There is a striking gap between contem-
porary theory and practice.
Somatization
Hoeper et al. (1979) used the SADS-L interview schedule in a primary care
126 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
population and diagnosed mental disorder in 27%. Of these over 80% were cases
of depression and anxiety, a finding also reported in several very large surveys of
primary care practices in the United States and Britain (Marshland et al. 1976;
Hesbacher et al. 1975; Goldberg 1979). Nielson and Williams (1980) diagnosed
12% of ambulatory patients in a prepaid health program as at least mildly
depressed, and 6% as moderately depressed. In 50% of their cases the primary
care physicians failed to diagnose depression. These and other studies too
numerous to cite disclose that depression is the commonest psychiatric disorder
and one of the commonest of all disorders in primary care practice (Katon et al.
1982). But many of these cases, psychiatrists demonstrate, are misdiagnosed by
nonpsychiatric physicians. For example, Eastwood (1971) revealed that in 124
medical outpatients determined to be suffering from psychiatric illness, almost
half of the women and almost 60% of the men were not so recognized by their
general practitioners. Much the same kind of Finding has been reported by Marks
et al. (1979) and Hesbacher et al. (1975). Goldberg and Blackwell (1970) term
such patients 'the hidden psychiatric morbidity'.
Goldberg (1979) found that over half the patients seen by primary care
physicians had significant somatic symptoms as part of their depressive disorder.
Singh (1968) showed that 65% of a depressed outpatient group presented to
the clinic with a physical complaint. Weissman et al. (1981) documented that
patients with depression who did not receive treatment for their emotional prob-
lems made significantly more visits to nonpsychiatric physicians than patients
without psychiatric diagnoses. Stoeckle and Davidson (1962) recognized that
depression often masqueraded as a vague physical complaint, most often fatigue
and loss of appetite. Raft et al. (1975) determined that while 29% of outpatients
in a general hospital fit criteria for depression, 12% had 'masked depression':
meaning that they complained of physical complaints associated with depression,
but not of psychological complaints. Widmer and Cadoret (1978, 1979) discov-
ered in the clinical charts of 154 depressed patients in family practice that when
compared to controls in the half year prior to when depression was diagnosed,
there was an increase in the number of patient initiated clinic visits, in hospital-
izations, and in presenting complaints of three types: "functional complaints,
pain of undetermined etiology and complaints of tension and anxiety." Pain
complaints seem to be an especially common feature of depression. Von Knoring
(1965) found that 60% of his patients with depression had experienced some
form of somatic pain. Ward et al. (1979) described a 100% prevalence of pain
complaints in a study of depressed psychiatric inpatients. Lindsay and Wykoff
(1981) found that 87% of 300 pain center patients fit RDC for Major Depressive
Disorder. When these patients were compared with 196 patients whom they
treated for Major Depressive Disorder, they found that 59% of the latter also had
significant pain complaints, principally involving head (60%), abdomen (29%),
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 127
back (38%), and chest (20%). Depression has been reported to be highly prevalent
among groups of patients with 'nonorganic' abdominal pain (Hill and Blendis
1967), diabetic neuropathy (Turkington 1980), chronic headache (Diamond
1964; Sherwin 1979), and low back pain (Stembach 1974), and each clinical
investigator found marked alleviation of both pain and depression after treatment
with tricyclic antidepressants. Blumer et al. (1980) showed that compared to
placebo significantly more chronic pain patients received partial to complete
alleviation of pain when treated with tricyclic antidepressant drugs, thus dis-
dosing by their treatment response that a large percentage of these patients were
depressed. Most of these 'pain' patients ostensibly denied depressed mood despite
having the vegetative symptoms of depression which stem from autonomic
nervous system, endocrine, and limbic system involvement in depressive disorder.
Blumer, along with many others, has shown that various social and psychological
'gains' the patient and/or family derive from pain complaints maintain chronic
illness behavior, thereby creating a vicious circle. Psychological 'gains' include
binding anxiety, relieving dysphoria, fulfilling disguised dependency needs,
sanctioning anger and aggressive wishes by troubling others and expressing
distress in personally and culturally legitimated idioms that cope with symptoms
by externalizing them. Secondary 'gains' include disability payments, change in
family systems, avoiding stressful situations, sanctioning of failure, etc.
A WHO survey revealed that of a sample of 1165 adult patients in primary
health care facilities in India, Sudan, and the Phillipines, at each center 11%
to 18% of cases had psychiatric disorders. Less than one-third of these were
recognized by health workers and appropriately treated. Most patients in this
sample complained of physical symptoms: headaches, other pain, weakness,
dizziness (Climent et al. 1980). As with the previous studies cited, these authors
point out the importance of early identification and proper treatment of depres-
sion and other forms of psychopathology to prevent chronic illness behavior,
overutilization of health facilities, polypharmacy, addiction to narcotic drugs,
expensive and unnecessary biological tests and surgeries, and serious iatrogenesis.
Other studies indicate that depression and most other mental illnesses, especially
in non-Western societies and in rural, ethnic and lower class groups in the West,
are associated preponderantly with physical complaints. For example, a recent
study in North America indicated that the most common complaints of depressed
patients in decreasing order of frequency are impaired concentration, weakness,
agitation, daytime drowsiness, headaches, excessive perspiration, dizziness, dry
mouth, rapid breathing, blurred vision, constipation, tinnitus, dry skin, delayed
ejaculation, flushing, slurred speech, premature ejaculation, chest pain, excessive
salivation, weight gain, amenorrhea, impotence, etc. (Mathew et al. 1981).
Intriguingly, many of these complaints appear in Beard's list of the symptoms
of neurasthenia.
128 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
adverse life experiences that result in psychophysiological changes, and personal stresses that
reinforce a tendency toward self-attention and evaluation. . . . although the relationship
between attention on internal states and reports of discomfort may be more substantial in
the case of psychological symptomology.., psychological and pliysieal symptoms are not
dearly distinguished and tend to occur concomitantly. Thus psychological distress may
produce bodily discomfort, increase body monitoring, and make persons more sensitive to
changes (Mechanic 1980: 154).
• the two major determinants of differential responses are actual adult experiences with
. .
symptoms and illness on the one hand, and cultural influences on the det'mitlon of illness
on the other. Whereas reporting physical symptoms is culturally more neutral, reporting
psychological symptoms is more dependent on social acceptability (Mechanic 1980: 154).
may demonstrate less evidence of pathology than the latter, and may even reveal
that somatization has certain adaptive effects.
That European psychiatrists in Africa in the Ftrst half of this century failed to
diagnose depression among their indigenous patients, whereas later investigators,
both Africans and Europeans who are fluent in the relevant languages, have
diagnosed levels of depression among the highest reported worldwide has been
taken as indicative of the crucial role of language in somatization. Left (1981),
noting that verbal equivalents of anxiety and depression are absent from a
number of languages in the non-Western world, suggests that there is a historical
and cross-cultural development of words for unpleasant emotional states. At an
early stage one word denotes the somatic accompaniments of dysphoria. At this
stage the somatic experience is relatively undifferentiated so that a range of
words is unnecessary. At the next linguistic developmental stage, the meaning of
the word broadens to include the psychological as well as the bodily experience
of emotions. Since the psychological experience is as undifferentiated as the
bodily experience, one word encompasses it. Thereafter, there comes a shift to
psychological experience and away from somatic experience. "Eventually the
root word split into a number of phonetically related variants as the global
psychological experience of unpleasant emotion was differentiated into several
distinct categories" (Left 1981: 45). This evolutionary explanation holds that
a number of non-Western languages remain at an early developmental stage,
"lacking words for depression and anxiety and instead possessing words for the
bodily experience of emotion which are relatively undifferentiated." Left notes
that in cross-cultural perspective, psychologizing emotions is more recent and
therefore should be highlighted against the older background of somatization. In
support of this argument he notes that depression and anxiety have no direct
equivalents in Yoruba, a Nigerian language, that the Xhosa people of South
Africa have no word meaning depression, but instead refer to this state via
a word meaning 'his heart is sore', and that the same holds for Luganda, an
Uganda language. In Chinese men conveys the sense of depression as a physical
sensation of something pressing on or depressing into the chest and heart.
MarseUa (1979) points out the same striking fact that indigenous categories
of mental disorder in a number of non-Western societies possess no concepts
of depression as disease or symptom. Left recognizes that some non-Western
languages do possess highly differentiated psychological terminology, but this he
takes as an exception. Left also presents evidence indicating that unpleasant
emotions seem to be less well differentiated in non-Indo.European centers that
participated in the WHO's International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia than in
132 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
past, but where religious discourse has always been rich in psychological terms
and their sophisticated use. These proponents of cultural relativism might
conclude that it is in the study of particular meanings, not generic words, in
particular situations, not dictionaries, that the psychological and social signifi-
cances of illness and emotions are to be understood, and though found present
in all human societies will be distinctive.
Somatization, then, receives a rather different treatment when it is regarded
as a culture-bound component of contemporary Western society's system of
symbolic meanings. For example, the Afghan psychiatrist Waziri (1973) reports
that Afghans with depression generally "had no words to describe their feelings
of sadness." But they could differentiate it from grief for a dead loved one. They
complained of a feeling "as if a strong hard hand was squeezing" their hearts.
This symptom was the one most stressed in his interviews with patients, the
one for which they principally sought relief. Yet Waziri did not examine the
semantics of this term, nor did he explain its status in Afghan cultural rules and
norms. But it has a striking resemblance to Good's work on heart distress in a
Turkish area of Iran and would have been an ideal subject for an interpretative
account. Rather the term is adduced to demonstrate somatization with the
assumption that its real meaning is an underlying affective disturbance (in the
Western sense). The related assumption in much of the psychiatric literature
on non-Western peoples is that psychological mindedness comes with higher
education and Westernization as a new language learned to express previously
unrecognized or unstated emotions. Because researchers writing from this
perspective often are Western-educated members of indigenous communities,
there is the lingering suspicion that such writers are somewhat divorced from
(and perhaps embarrassed by) their own native cultures and tend to see things
only from a mental health perspective, a decidedly Western point of view. Here
is an excellent reason why anthropological field research on the cultural mean-
ings of illness behavior and emotions is needed as a complement to biomedical
and psychological studies. Only an ethnographic field approach is likely to
elucidate the culture-specific significance of symptoms.
To the evolutionist and relativist interpretations, Izard (1979), building on
work begun by Darwin, offers a universalist alternative. Focusing on studies of
the facial expression of emotion, she shows that the same emotional experiences
are detectable in a wide variety of cultures and appear to derive from basic
neurophysiological correlates of human and animal behavior. These should have
the same somatic, affective and cognitive expressions cross culturally. She and
others suggest that depression may occur in nonhuman primates. For example,
Suomi et al. (1978) produced depressive-like reactions in young rhesus monkeys
by repeated separations and improved these to a greater extent than placebo did
with an antidepressant drug. Hence the major interpretations of emotions cross
134 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
culturally seem to fail into three quite distinctive interpretive frameworks. Each
can be (and has been) applied to elucidate somatization.
THESTUDY
the SADS and with the psychiatric disorders listed above, as well as about past
medical history, and work, educational, family, marital and personal histories. A
questionnaire was constructed to gather information on stressful life events in
the six months prior to the onset of the illness and, in cases of chronic illness,
prior to the most recent exacerbation. It also inquired about coping, social
support network, explanatory model, perceived social impairment, and sig-
nificant psychosocial problems (i.e., family, marital, work, school, fmancial,
doctor-patient, hereafter referred to as illness problems) associated with the
illness experience and its treatment. Stressors, social impairment and illness
problems were scaled on a five point scale of perceived severity. Following these
assessments, each patient underwent an open-ended ethnographic interview
to determine the social significance and uses of their symptoms in terms of
their day-to-day illness behavior in their concrete social contexts. When family
members and/or co-workers were available, they were queried about many of
the same points and also asked to provide whatever additional information they
were willing to contribute.
Patients were asked to return five to six weeks following the initial interview
for follow-up assessment which consisted of review of current symptoms,
assessment of change in past symptoms, perceived social impairment, specific
illness problems, help seeking, and compliance. Each was scaled as in the initial
interview. Ethnographic interviews were repeated to reasses the social signifi-
cance and uses of illness behavior. Post-treatment explanatory models were
collected, and in a few cases psychological and biological tests were performed
to rule out medical disease or organic mental disorder. Family members and
co-workers who accompanied patients to the follow-up also were queried about
these issues.
Seventy-six patients returned for the full follow-up interview, and 23 of
these returned for a second follow-up. The major reason for not returning was
living at too great a distance from the hospital. Several patients who failed to
return sent back replies about their current condition, or their local doctors
did so. But these data, which were quite incomplete, are not included in the
outcome data. The research team was responsible for providing treatment for
the patients in the study, which consisted almost entirely of psychopharma-
cological medication. This doubtless inhibited the ethnographic interviews,
and rendered the compliance evaluation questionable, but was probably also
responsible for the very full replies to the psyehosocial questionnaire and clinical
assessments.
RESULTS
TABLE I
Demography of Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic, Hunan Medical College
N = 361 Consecutive Patients a
Sex
Males 184, Females 177
Occupation
Peasant - farmers 22%
Cadres 17%
Workers 42%
Students 11%
Professionals 0%
Housewife or retired 8%
Age Structure
15 and under 7%
15-25 25%
26-45 50%
46-60 17%
over 60 2%
a These were all the patients seen in one week of 10 half-day clinic sessions.
TABLE II
Diagnoses of 361 Consecutive Patients, Psychiatry Clinic, Hunan Medical College a
% of
Cases c
Schizophrenia 31
Other psychosis (including organic mental disorder) 4
Neurasthenia 19
Neurasthenia syndromes 12
Neurasthenia (all forms) 31
Neurosis b 15
Hysteria 4
Depression 1
Neurological disorders 11
No diagnosis 4
TABLE III
Occupation
Peasant-farmers 2
Cadres 16 (13 political, 3 technical)
Workers 48 (45 laborers, 2 office workers, 1 retired, 1 unemployed)*
Teachers 18 (6 primary, 6 junior middle school, 6 senior middle school)
Professionals - 10 (3 engineers, 3 nurses, 2 doctors, 2 senior technicians)
Students 6 (4 college, 2 senior middle school)
Age Structure
18-25 16%
26-45 66%
46-56 18%
Mean Age 36, Males 33, Females 38
As Table III shows there were more men (52) than women (48). This Fmding
is surprising in cross-cultural psychiatry research, since evidence from many
cultures reveals that women more commonly suffer from depression, anxiety
states and various somatization syndromes than men. But it is in keeping with
the demography of the Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic at the Hunan Medical
College, where in a one-week period there were 184 men and 177 women in
attendance. Again this finding is unusual in cross-cultral perspective, since in
most societies women predominate in psychiatric clinics. Before generalizing
from these data, it is essential that we learn more about the demography of
psychiatric clinics throughout China than we presently know. The f'mding in
the initial visit that there were many more patients unaccompanied than accom-
panied by family or co-workers also is opposite to what we have come to expect
for Asian and other non-Western societies (including other Chinese settings),
where most patients tend to be accompanied so that the doctor-patient interac-
tion is at least triadic and frequently involves several family members and friends.
Future descriptive studies will indicate whether this f'mding is valid for the
Hunan Medical College and for other psychiatric clinics in China. While slightly
more patients were self-referred or referred by family or friends to the clinic
than were referred through the formal medical system, as we shall see later
on most patients' pathways of help seeking did in fact pass through Western
medicine and Chinese medicine clinics. That nearly half the patients received
138 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
a medical referral suggests that general physicians recognized that there was
some sort of psychiatric problem. Although this recognition rate comes close to
that we cited above for somatization patients treated in primary care in the
West, we did not determine if in the other cases there was a failure to identify
psychiatric problems.
The neurasthenia patients and the psychiatric clinic sample show some
differences in age structure. We did not include children or the elderly in the
neurasthenia group in order not to have to deal with childhood psychopathology
and dementia. In both groups there is a preponderance of patients in the 26 to
45 years age range.
Some major differences in occupation were documented. There is a marked
underrepresentation of peasant-farmers in the neurasthenia sample compared
with their general prevalence in the psychiatry clinic, and a slight underrepresen-
tation of students. Although accounting for 8% of patients in the Psychiatry
Outpatient Clinic, housewives do not appear in the neurasthenia group and there
was only one retiree (a worker); the latter doubtless were excluded by the age
criteria. The overrepresentation of professionals (especially health professionals)
in the neurasthenia group should be noted. Though the excess of professionals
and teachers fits with Chinese stereotypes of neurasthenia, the preponderance of
workers and the presence of 16 cadres indicate that neurasthenia covers major
segments of the Chinese urban population. Rural research should help clarify
whether the very small number of peasant-farmers in our sample can be inter-
preted to mean that this disorder is less frequently diagnosed among members
of this group or that neurasthenia patients, unlike schizophrenia cases, are not
brought to the psychiatry clinic because this problem is not deemed serious
enough to warrant travel and time away from a very busy season of agricultural
work.
These 100 patients had 422 family members whom they either lived with or
regarded as members of their household or family, fla. The patients and their
family members occupied 239 rooms. A mean of 4.4 members per family
occupied 2.5 rooms, yielding a rate of almost two persons per room. One quarter
of the patients lived in dormitories.
Psychopathology
TABLE IV
Diagnosesa of 100 Neurasthenia Patients
Number
of Cases,
Major DepressiveDisorder 87
Manic DepressiveDisorder (Depressed) 3
Dysthymic Disorder (DepressiveNeurosis) 2
Cyclothymic Disorder (Depressed) 1
Depression (all forms) 93
Panic Disorder 35
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 13
Phobic Disorder 20
Anxiety States (all forms) 69
Obessive-CompulsiveDisorder 2
Alcoholism. 1
Drug Abuse (intoxication and addiction) 1
Chronic Pain Syndrome 44
number of symptoms per case was almost 6, only 10% of cases had the minimum,
62% experienced 6 or more, and 13% demonstrated all 8 diagnostic symptoms.
Thus there were few equivocal diagnoses: these patients were clearly clinically
depressed.
Anxiety Disorders were diagnosed in 69 cases, with Panic Disorder (35) the
most frequent. The overlap of anxiety and depression, as was noted earlier, has
often and widely been reported in the clinical literature. A quarter of the sample
showed the classical stigmata of hysteria as more narrowly defined under DSM-
III's Somatoform Disorders category. Again there was some overlap between
hysteria (especially Conversion Disorder) and depression.
In keeping with what is know about psychopathology among Chinese gener-
ally (I_in et al. 1981), the two cases of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and the
single case of Alcoholism indicate the small numbers of these problems, especially
the latter, in Chinese culture. Chinese seem to be protected by their culture
against alcoholism, which is one of the commonest mental health problems
140 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
TABLE V
Diagnoses of Somatization Cases in Taiwan N = 51 a
Number
of Cases %
Panic Disorder 5 10
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 14 27
Phobic Disorder 0 0
Anxiety (all forms) 19 37
a Note: 58 cases of somatization were included in the "Taiwan Comparison of Western and
Traditional Healing", but fun psychiatric assessment data were available for only 51 of these
cases. Almost all of these cases had been diagnosed at one time or another by Western-style
or Chinese-style doctors or shamans as neurasthenia, or had self-diagnosed themselves or
been diagnosed by family members with this label.
142 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
TABLEVI
Neurasthenia Patients
Hunan Taiwan
TABLE VII
Major Depressive Disorder (N = 87)
Number
of Cases %
With Melancholia 26 30
Acute 35 40
Cttronic 32 60
TABLE VIII
DSM-III Symptoms, Major Depressive Disorder N = 87
a Depressed mood, hopelessness, irritability. (Note: most of these complaints were not
spontaneously expressed, but elicited in response to specific questions about them.) This
def'mition of dysphoria follows DSM-III (see Note 4).
Pain
TABLE IX
Pain Complaints and Depression in Neurasthenia Patients (N = 100)
Note: Ninety percent of patients with Major Depressive Disorder and 90% of the entire
sample of neurasthenia patients have pain complaints, while 43% of the former and 44% of
the latter have Chronic Pain Syndrome.
a Percentages add to more than 100% owing to rounding.
TABLE X
Breakdown of Patients with Pain, N = 90
Types of Pain
Chronic Pain Pain complaints Pain
Complaints Syndrome (without CPS) (all forms)
a Primary complaints.
b Secondary complaints.
c Back pain, chest pain, neck pain, limb pain, abdominal pain, whole body pain, etc.
Presenting Complain ts
TABLEXI
Major Categoriesof Presenting Complaints of Neurasthenia Patients N = 100
TABLE XII
Illness Idioms a in Major Depressive Disorder N = 87
Number
of Cases %
TABLE XIII
Chief Presenting Complalntsa in all Depressive Cases (N = 93)
Number % of
of Cases Cases
TABLE XIV
Comparison of Presenting Affective and Cognitive Complaintsa in All Depressive Cases
N= 93
Numb~ %
Cognitive Complaints 74
loss of or poor memory 40 43
dreams 20 22
Poor concentration 11 12
speech unclear 3 3
A ffective Complaints 95 b
Specific, Differentiated 44
anxiety 36 39
depression 8 9
TABLE XV
Elicited Psychological Symptomsa for All Depressive Disorder Patients N = 93
Number % of
of Cases Cases
present for a case to make the DSM-III diagnosis for Major Depressive Disorder,
all the neurasthenics with Major Depressive Disorder met this criterion. Hence
it appears that, at least in this sample, we can say that Chinese depressives
suppressed affective presenting complaints. Difficulty concentrating or making
decisions or in thinking generally was elicited in 84%, again underlining the
importance of perceived cognitive changes in depression. Half of the depressive
patients maintained marked hypochondriacal preoccupation, including fear of
brain tumor in 13 cases and of going 'crazy' in 17 others.6 These were almost
somatic delusions in several of the cases.
As has been shown in the past, few Chinese depressives admitted to feelings
of guilt. Yap (1965), for example, reported this f'mding for Cantonese. (Sur-
prisingly Cheung et al. (1981) found guilt or self-reproach in a relatively high
proportion of their Hong Kong sample. But they do not say exactly how com-
mon guilt specifically was, and in our sample feelings of worthlessness were also
relatively common though guilt was uncommon. Could many of their patients
have been Westernized Christians?) Sethi et al. (1973) noted little guilt among
Indian patients as did Rao (1973); and the same has been reported for Iraqi
(Bazzaui 1970), West African (Binitie 1975) and many other non-Western
depressives. Murphy et al. (1967) associated guilt with Christianity, and others
have added Islam (El-Islam 1969), but not with Buddhism, Hinduism or African
religions. But this cross-cultural distinction has been challenged. Rao (1973)
refers with some disquiet to karmic guilt, and more recently Orley and Wing
(1979) present evidence that there was more guilt among Ugandan depressives
than among Londoners. Guilt in non-Western samples has also been said to be
more prevalent with higher social class, education and modernity. But anthropo-
logically sophisticated analyses of guilt in depression have yet to be conducted,
and in their absence we should be cautious of making too much of the findings
of superficial psychiatric surveys lest we repeat the kind of fiasco created by the
naive early distinctions between guilt and shame. In the present study, I did not
explore the meaning of guilt among those few patients who reported it or its
absence among most of the depressed patients. Hence I am uncertain if guilt for
these Chinese means the same thing it does in the West, or whether the same
meaning may not be conveyed in the semantic field of other Chinese terms. For
this reason I hesitate to place too much importance on our finding that while
only 9% of depressed neurasthenics admitted harboring feelings of guilt, 60%
reported low self-esteem or worthlessness. Some studies have correlated reduced
rates of low self-esteem and feelings of worthlessness with the relative scarcity of
guilt, while others like our own have demonstrated these psychological symptoms
to vary independently of each other.
There was an impressively small number of suicidal thoughts, plans and
attempts among the depressed Hunan patients. While some suicidal preoccupation
150 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
TABLE XVI
Culture-Bound Complaints a in Neurasthenia
Number of
Complaints
a Most of these were not spontaneously expressed, but offered in response to specific
questions about them.
Explanatory Models
Most patients expected a chronic course and had experienced just that, but
almost a third feared their illness would progressively worsen. Only 2% felt their
illness was improving at the time of our initial interview. In Table XVIII we see
that 40% of patients left the choice of treatment to their doctors, but the rest
TABLE XVII
Explanatory Models (EMs) of Neurasthenia Patients N = 100
1. Nature o f Problem
Organic problem 44% |
Wholly or partially ]
organic / Mixed organic and
psychological problems 34%
/ 78%
(somatopsychic >
psychosomatic EM)
Psychological problem 22%
2. Name o f Problem a
Neurasthenia 44%b
Neurological disorder (e.g., neurological
pain, brain tumor, etc.) 27%
Minor psychological problem (general, vague) 18%
Psychosis 10%
Other 7%
Don't know 4%
3. Perceived Cause c
Work problems 61%
Political problems 25%
Separation 25%
Marital/Family Problems 20%
Exam and school stress 16%
Another illness 13%
Economic problems 12%
Grief (loss of close relative) 12%
Emotional tension or stress 12%
Nutritional 9%
Genetic 5%
4. Expected Course
Acute (will quickly end) 4%
Chronic stable 57%
Progressive worsening 31%
Improving 2%
Don't know 6%
TABLE XVIII
Desired Treatment a of Neurasthenia Patients
Table X I X - X X I I present data on the help seeking and illness behavior o f the
neurasthenia patients. As has been found for patients in Taiwan (Kleinman
1980) and in the United States (Demers et al. 1981), self.treatment was quite
popular in our sample. But unlike Taiwan, where most patients in an earlier
TABLE XIX
Help Seeking of Neurasthenia Patients N = 100
% of
Cases
TABLE XX
Self (Family) Treatment
% of
Cases
TABLE XXI
Illness Behavior of Neurasthenia Patients
Mean visits to doctors 1.9 per month (range 0.5-8 per month).
Perceived percentage of time sick past year: 75% (mean).
Percentage of eases who viewed themselves as sick 100% of time past year: 33%.
Percentage of cases perceiving self as at least moderately socially impaired a in past year:
52%.
Percentage of cases perceiveing self as seriously socially impairedb: 15%.
a Moderately socially impaired: Illness interferes with work, school, personal and/or other
relationships and prevents normal social performance.
b Seriously socially impaired: because of illness unable to work, attend school, or carry out
relationships or activities in unit or family.
TABLE XXII
Prior Medical Treatment Received
%of
Cases
Western physicians 98
Traditional Chinese doctors 84
Mostly saw Western physicians 76
Mostly saw Chinese doctors 24
Sedatives (all types) in past year 58
Benzodiazepines in past year 47
Received mostly traditional Chinese medicine pasf year 60
study resorted first to self care (Kleinman 1980), only a third of the Hunan
neurasthenia patients did so. This discrepancy most probably reflects the ready
access to inexpensive care in the People's Republic. In spite of active suppression
of religious healing in China, almost a quarter of our sample engaged in such
treatment and, even though the study took part in a large city, 14%had sought
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 155
out help from shamans, sorcerers and other religious experts, suggesting that folk
healing is still actively pursued in China. Special foods, tonics, dietary changes,
traditional Chinese medicine, and Western exercises in that order were by far
the most common self-treatments. There was only quite limited lay resort to
Western medicinals. Perhaps patients were reluctant to admit such use to the
researchers, who were themselves Western-style physicians.
As a group the neurasthenia patients demonstrated a degree of illness behavior
that was considered excessive by local standards. They made on the average
almost two visits to doctors per month (see Table XXI), a high figure for patients
at the Hunan Medical College. Moreover, they perceived themselves as sick
75% of the time during the preceding year, and one-third of patients regarded
themselves as sick 100% of that time. More than half regarded their illness as
interfering with work, school, personal and/or other relationships and believed it
prevented normal social activities. Fifteen percent of patients were so seriously
socially impaired because of the illness that they were unable to work, attend
school, or carry out normal social activities and relationships in their unit
(danwei) or family.
Table XXII indicates that virtually all patients had consulted Western-style
physicians for their illness and that a great many had also sought out care from
traditional Chinese doctors. But for most the chief source of care was Western-
style physicians. Intriguingly, in spite of this fact, patients were receiving mostly
traditional Chinese medicines, which were being prescribed by Western-style as
well as Chinese-style doctors. It was a surprise and a concern to learn that 58%
of patients had received sedatives in the past year, and that almost half had
received benzodiazepines. In short, patients were receiving polypharmacy (more
than three drugs per person) with traditional herbs, sedatives and anti-anxiety
agents, along with vitamins, tonics and pain medicines. This situation is encoun-
tered often with chronic pain and other somatization patients in the United
States and is consistent as well with the high utilization rate and frequent
changes in care-givers and medical regimens.
Family History
More :than a third of patients had a family history of neurasthenia, and in 70%
of those with an affected family member it was the patient's mother (see Table
XXIII). More than half gave a family history of chronic illness, a quarter had
chronic pain patients in their families, and approximately the same number
had a positive family history for mental illness (54% of the time affecting the
patient's mother). Depression accounted for 62% of all mental illness in the
family. Sixty-four percent of patients reported significant psychological problems
in their families, 35% substantial family discord, and 12% reported step-parents
156 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
TABLE XXIII
Family History of Neurasthenia Patients
% of
Cases
(owing to remarriage) with whom they had often maintained poor relationslups.
In 28% of families there was a member working in the health field. In the absence
of a control group or valid community data, it is difficult to know how to
interpret these findings, but it was the impression of my psychiatric colleagues
that these would be unusual fmdings for most Chinese families, indicating high
rates of physical and mental illness, family pathology, and contact with the
health care professions. Although I can't rule out a genetic basis to neurasthenia,
and there is good evidence from many studies for a genetic contribution to
depression, these data could also be interpreted to support a social learning
hypothesis of neurasthenia as chronic illness (somatization) behavior. Patients
grew up with family models of chronic illness, pain, depression and neurasthenia,
particularly their mothers. This burden of illness behavior and the reported
high levels of personal and family problems may well have seriously affected
parenting and social support, and offered a family language of bodily complaints
and perceptual style of bodily preoccupation as a dominant response to stress as
Mechanic (1980) hypothesizes. Perhaps it also provided an ethos of demoraliza-
tion and hopelessness (cf. Brown and Harris 1978) that impaired the development
of a sense of personal and social efficacy while fostering vulnerability to despair
and depression (cf. Beck 1971; Minuchin et al. 1978) and chronic help seeking,
especially from the medical system with which these families were so familiar.
These are issues to be examined in future that we do not possess enough in-
formation to confirm in the present sample.
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 157
Major Stressors
TABLE XXIV
Types of Major Stressors Experienced by Neurasthenia Patients
Number of major st~essors per patient in 6 months prior to onset of illness, mean 3.3
(range 0-6)
% of
Cases
Work 75
Separation a 57
Financial 45
Political 31
Death of spouse or other family member 29
School (including exams)b 26
Family 19
a Owing to different work sites and involving a mean time of 6.2 years (range 4 months to
20 years).
b Either experienced by patients dkeetiy or visda-vistheir children.
The lack of a matched control group also affects the interpretation of Table
XXIV which presents the types of major stressors experienced by the 100
neurasthenic patients in the six months prior to illness onset or, in case of
chronic illness, most recent exacerbation. On the average, patients experienced
3.3 stressors that they themselves reported as major during this period. Work
stress affected 75% of the sample, separation owing to work site 57%, financial
problems 45%, significant political problems 31%, death of spouse or other
family member 29%, school and examination stress was reported by 26%, and
major family stress by 19%. From these data it is clear that work stress was the
single most important stressor. Separation of spouses, or less often parents and
children, because of different and distant work sites was an impressive stressor
with a mean time of separation of 6.2 years and on the average a few usually
brief visits home per year. There were only several cases of actual divorce in
the sample. It was the impression of the Chinese psychiatrists who collaborated
with me that though these patients had experienced substantial stress, the
same stressors had been experienced by large numbers of individuals in China.
Certainly, separation owing to different work sites, which may strike Westerners
as unusual, has been accepted by Chinese historically for economic reasons and
probably conveys different cultural and personal significance than in the West.
It will take the development of culturally valid instruments to measure perceived
stressful life event change that provide substantial data for normals and patients
158 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
suffering other diseases as well as for neurasthenic patients before the relation-
ship of stress to neurasthenia can be better understood.
lllness Problems
TABLE XXV
Illness Problems of Neurasthenia Patients
agencies on the other. I will return to this datum's important social implications
in the discussion section.
TABLE XXVI
Types of Illness Problems of Neurasthenia Patients N = 100
%of
Cases
Work 90
Family 80
School 56
Maritala 52
Financial 45
Doctor-Patient Conflict 15
Otherb 23
Table XXVI shows that patients' illness behavior was accompanied by work
problems in 90% o f the cases and by family problems in 80%. School and marital
problems also were prevalent in more than half o f cases, while illness was asso-
ciated with financial problems in 45% of cases. Although only 15% of cases
involved doctor-patient conflict, there are such a large number of neurasthenics
in China and such conflicts are so uncommonly observed in its health care system
that if this finding is substantiated, the total number of such conflicts may be
quite large and neurasthenic patients may represent a large portion of 'difficult
or problem patients'. Characteristic illness problems included inability to carry
out one's job, marital strain, family conflicts and breakdown, school and exami-
nation failure, substantial financial loss, and contrastive medical and lay views of
what is wrong and what should be done. These problems illumine the everyday
life burden of illness.
lllness Meanings
TABLE XXVII
Significance (Meaning) of lllness N = 98 a
% of
Casesb
a Two of the 100 neurasthenia cases were not assessed for significance of illness.
b % is greater than 100% since more than one significance was assigned for most cases.
Ou tco m e
Table XXVIII shows that when patients with Major Depressive Disorder, all of
whom were treated with antidepressant drugs, were asked at time of follow-up
to assess their symptoms, 82% regarded themselves as at least slightly i m p r o v e d ,
while 65% evaluated their symptoms as substantially improved. Nine percent
did not feel there was any improvement, and 10% felt their symptoms had
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 161
TABLE XXVIII
Patient Self-Assessment of Symptom Outcome of Major Depressive Disordera N-71 b
Number
of Cases %c
Improved (1-4) 58 82
Substantially improved (1-3) 46 65
(1) Completely (no current problems) 1 1
(2) Greatly (only minor current problems) 30 42
(3) Partially (still has some problems but substantially
less than before) 15 21
(4) Slightly (still has significant current problem) 12 17
No Improvement 6 9
Worse 7 10
TABLE XXIX
Physician Assessment of Symptom Outcome of Major Depressive Disorder Patients a
N= 71b
Number
of Cases %
Improved (1 --4) 62 87
Substantially improved (1-3) 50 70
(1) Completely (no current problems) 3 4
(2) Greatly (only minor current problems) 29 41
(3) Partially (still has some problems but substantially
less than before) 18 25
(4) Slightly (still has significant current problems) 12 17
No Improvement 3 4
Worse 6 9
(at least slight), whereas the symptoms of 70% were evaluated as substantially
improved. Only 4% exhibited no symptomatic improvement, while 9% appeared
worse. Eighty-two percent of Major Depressive Disorder patients returned for
follow-up. Several of those who didn't wrote that they lived too far away to
return for follow-up, b u t we do n o t know why others failed to return. This
unaccounted for proportion of nonreturning patients should caution against
overinterpreting the outcome data.
TABLE XXX
Major Depressive Disorder Patient Self-Assessmentof Change in Social Impairmenta
N=71
Number
of Cases %b
TABLE XXXI
Change in Help Seeking of Neurasthenia Patienta N = 76 b
Number
of Cases %
TABLE XXXII
Outcome of Patient Illness Problemsa N = 76
a Assessed in initial interview and at time of foUow-up (see Katon and Kleinman 1981 ; and
Kleinman 1978). N is neurasthenia patients who returned for follow-up, 76%.
b Family problems include problems with in-laws, parents, children, and various relatives
except for spouse.
c School problems refers both to problems experienced by patients and by children of
patients.
d Percentage adds to less than 100% owing to rounding.
e No problem at time of ftrst visit and at follow-up.
\
Table XXXII lists the outcome of illness problems among patients with Major
Depressive Disorder. Almost two-thirds of patients with maladaptive coping
(noncompliance, doctor shopping, giving up, passive-hostile behavior, unwilling-
ness to carry out normal social activities, withdrawal and isolation, failure to
successfully mobilize or alienation of social network supports, etc.) either stayed
164 A R T H U R KLEINMAN
the same or got worse. A substantial number o f work problems either remained
unchanged (35%) or worsened (20%), and the same was true to a lesser extent
o f family and school and Fmancial problems. Almost as many marital problems
stayed the same or worsened as improved. These findings would seem to indicate
that although antidepressant drugs may have significantly benefited symptoms,
they frequently did not have a major effect on illness problems. Again we have
evidence of much less improvement in an important psychosocial aspect o f
illness. This table demonstrates that medical treatment without significant
psychosocial intervention exerts only a limited effect on the overall sickness.
TABLE XXXIII
Compliance as a Function of Symptom Outcome of Patients with Major Depressive
Disorder a N = 71
Number Compliance b
of Cases % (Mean Score)
TABLE XXXIV
Depressed (all forms) Patients' Name of Their Disorder at Time of Follow-Up a N = 73 b
Number % of
of Cases Casesc
Neurasthenia 50 69
Depression 8 11
Other 15 21
a All patients in this group had been told at time of initial visit their problem was depres-
sion, had been given a biomedical EM of depression, and had been treated with antidepres-
sants (in more than 70% of 71 cases evaluated at follow-up by psychiatrists with substantial
improvement).
b Number of depressed patients for whom a follow-up EM could be obtained; in two via
correspondence.
c Percentages add to more than 100% owing to rounding.
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 165
The penultimate table shows that compliance varied directly with perceived
symptom improvement. This finding could be interpreted to argue against a
major role for social determinants of noncompliance in this patient sample. But
we simply did not collect sufficient information on this topic to go beyond a
superficial level of analysis, and our measure of compliance (patient reports) was
indirect and crude enough to render even this conclusion uncertain. This may
simply be another example of the well-known fact that you can't accurately
assess compliance by having the providers of patients' care ask them about
compliance in the very setting in which they are being treated.
The last table relates to the fact all patients diagnosed as suffering Major
Depressive Disorder were informed of this diagnosis before treatment and were
even given biomedical explanation of depressive disease. Moreover, as has already
been discussed, most of these patients experienced symptomatic improvement
after taking drugs identified to them as antidepressants. Yet only 11% reported
at follow-up that their disorder was depression, while 69% held to the notion (or
came to believe) they were suffering from neurasthenia. That is to say, there was
only a 7% change in explanatory models from neurasthenia to depression not
withstanding explanations to the contrary and positive response to treatment
identified as specific for depression. A large percentage of patients called their
disorder neurasthenia after treatment than prior to it. Indeed most patients
actively denied that their disorder was depression when we tried to assert that
it was. I will return to this fascinating finding below when we discuss the place
of neurasthenia and depression in Chinese psychiatry and society.
To illustrate the real life persons and problems behind the statistics I will
present several brief case synopses of neurasthenia patients with Major Depressive
Disorder presenting in somatic and psychological modes.
Case 1: 18-year-old male senior middle school student who one year before
unexpectedly failed an examination and as a result was moved out of a special
high-level group in his class and into a mid-level group. As a result of exam
failure, his parents, both of whom are top-level cadres who hold great expecta-
tions for this their eldest son, yelled at him, blaming him for not working hard
enough in school and severely criticizing him for his poor test performance.
They told him he would have no future ff he didn't work harder. At the same
time his schoolmates laughed at him for falling from a special group who were
being primed for the university entrance exam down to a mediocre group who
were not expected to go on to the university. The patient felt demoralized and
166 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
humiliated. Even before this time he had harbored self doubts about his own
academic skills and being able to achieve at the high level expected of him by his
parents. After failing the exam the patient became depressed, felt hopeless and
worthless, lost interest in things that previously were pleasurable, thought of
death, and experienced insomnia, headaches, dizziness, loss of energy, early
morning waking, poor appetite, weight loss, poor concentration, and marked
anxiety. He developed a haggard look and felt dizzy and complained of dry
mouth and constipation. But the patient quite openly expressed his demoraliza-
tion and sad mood, and in his Explanatory Model related his dysphoria and
anhedonia to stress and his own psychological make-up. But fascinatingly, even
though the patient and family regarded his problem to be a psychological one
and sought out appropriate counseling and psychiatric care, his illness idiom was
still dominated by somatic complaints which they viewed as more worrisome
than the psychological complaints and for which they sought out medical care.
His Explanatory Model, furthermore, was somatopsychic, since he regarded
stress and his personality as affecting his brain and producing organic pathology
that was responsible for his mood disturbance.
headaches~ which she regards as her real illness. These symptoms all were present
a decade ago at the onset of her illness. She has tried more than 10 different
drugs and visited five different clinics in two months in pursuit of an effective
remedy for her headaches. She decided to visit the psychiatry clinic after reading
a paper in a medical journal on Pavlov's view of neurasthenia as due to "negative
localization in the brain". She believed she had organic brain pathology and
requested an electroencephalographic assessment. Six weeks later at time of
follow-up and after treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant, the patient had
normal sleep and appetite, greatly improved social functioning at work and
home, and felt her mood was '70%' better. Though her headaches were still
present, they were described as '60%' better. The patient is still trying to avoid
transfer to a new work site on the grounds of her health problem, which she
calls 'neurasthenia'. She is actively negotiating a modifiedwork schedule to
accommodate her illness, one that she reports is feasible at her current work site
but not in the new clinic she has been asked to head up.
similar to those she now experiences after the birth of her second child. She lives
with her husband's parents with whom she has always had a poor relationship
and who she feels fail to give her support, but do take care of her when she is
ill. After treatment of her Major Depressive Disorder and Agoraphobia with
Imipramine, the patient experienced a substantial improvement in symptoms but
she still regarded herself as socially impaired and had not returned to work. At
time of second follow-up she reported a negotiation with the leading cadres in
her factory regarding part-time lighter work and the possibility of her husband
receiving a transfer back to Changsha sometime the following year.
I will now paraphrase. Suppose, she said, looking at the ground, you were
climbing a mountain and this mountain was very steep and terribly difficult
to climb. To the right and the left you could see people falling off the moun-
tainside. Holding on to your neck and back were several family members so
that if you fell so would they. For 20 years you climbed this mountain with
your eyes fixed on the handholds and footholds. You neither looked back or
ahead. Finally you reached the top of the mountain. Perhaps this is the first
time you have looked backward and seen how much you had endured, how
difficult your life and your family's situation had been, how blighted your hopes
. . . . She ended by asking me if this was not a good enough reason to become
depressed.
The results of this descriptive study address the relationship between neuras-
thenia, somatization and depression for patients in the psychiatry clinic where
it was conducted in Hunan. But since I am not aware of a similar attempt to
unravel this relationship elsewhere in China, I am tempted to generalize to the
wider Chinese context so that an hypothesis is advanced that can be tested
in future research in other local settings. If stated in general enough terms,
moreover, such an hypothesis could be applied to those many areas of the world
where neurasthenia may not be a common diagnosis but somatization is highly
prevalent. Although I recognize that both the restricted nature of the sample
and the preliminary quality of the investigation make this a somewhat risky
undertaking, I believe that with appropriate restraint such an exercise can be
useful in forcing us to critically think through the broad implications of our
study for psychiatry in China and cross culturally. It is in this exploratory spirit
of theoretical inquiry that I offer the following analysis, one that seeks to
integrate clinical and anthropological approaches to our f'mdings in order to
raise fundamental questions as much as to suggest possible answers.
Our best understanding of somatization, I believe, is based on the now widely
accepted distinction between illness and disease. When we become sick we first
experience illness: i.e., we perceive, label, communicate, interpret, and cope with
symptoms, and we usually do this not alone but together with family members,
friends, workrnates, and other members of our social network. Personal, inter-
actional, and cultural norms guide this lived experience. That is to say, shared
cultural beliefs (about the body, specific symptoms, and illness generally),
constraints in our concrete social situation, and aspects of the self (personality;
coping style, prior experience, etc.) together with our explanatory model for the
particular episode of illness orient us to how to act when ill, how to diagnose
and treat, and how to regard and manage the life problems illness creates.
170 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
When we visit medical professionals (or for that matter folk healers) the
initial basis for clinical communication is commonsense understandings that
patient and practitioner share as members of the same culture. Thus, at the
outset patients and practitioners discuss illness.
But during the clinical transaction the practitioner begins to construe the
patient's problem as disease: i.e., he perceives, labels, interprets and treats it as
a specific abnormality in his profession's nosological system. For the patient
who complains of excessive thirst, urination and hunger, the biomedically-
trained physician will seek out evidence to determine whether the patient is
suffering from diabetes mellitus. Through this process illness as lay experience
becomes transformed into disease as biomedical explanation and a clinical entity
is created. That is to say, the practitioner constructs a new social reality, the
disease, which will also come to influence how the patient thinks and lives his
illness. Indeed, in the biomedical viewpoint the disease is an abnormality in
biological structure or function that generates the symptoms of illness. As
Eisenberg (1977) has shown, however, the interplay between disease and illness
aspects of a given sickness can be and frequently is powerful and complex, and
in the course of a chronic disorder either aspect may become the major source of
exacerbation and remission.
My purpose here is not to elaborate this distinction further (see Kleinman
1 9 8 0 : 7 2 - 8 0 for additional details), but simply to apply it first to somatization
and thereafter to neurasthenia and depression. In my understanding of somatiza-
ti0n, we have cases either in which physical complaints are expressed but a
corresponding organic lesion cannot be detected, or in which such complaints
are amplified so that symptomatology and perceived disability exceed what
would be expected from a particular lesion. As I have akeady shown, depression,
anxiety and other psychiatric disorders can produce either situation. Major
Depressive Disorder in the course of heart disease can prolong recovery, exacer-
bate symptoms, and substantially worsen disability - all of which can be reversed
by effectively treating the depression. Panic Disorder in the absence of any other
pathology can produce disabling physical symptoms that resemble those of
cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, epilepsy and other medical disorders.
When the Panic Disorder is alleviated, so are the physical complaints. But as the
work of Mechanic (1980) illustrates, stress can so affect a susceptible individual
that entirely normal bodily experiences are misinterpreted as symptoms of
illness or, more lig~ly, the psychophysiological correlates of affective arousal and
personal distress are amplified and labeled as illness. In this case psychological
and somatic symptoms may not be differentiated, for personal and cultural
reasons, and expressed separately. Instead the individual complains of the
physical symptoms that are the correlates of depressed, anxious, or angry affect.
Although in the sick person's social group there may be implicit understanding
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 171
idioms we learn to use to nuture and help. I think I need not belabor the point.
Somatization can be at times culturally supported, socially useful, and personally
availing.
Of course no social system could sustain the cost of massive resort to this
idiom of distress and coping strategem. Health care resources, both familial and
societal, would be overwhelmed, and there would be immense suspicion of the
motives of sick people. Perhaps this is what Parsons (1951) visualized when he
described the American sick role as requiring that the occupant must want to get
better and must seek out help to do so. But this hardly applies to chronic illness
where, despite the desire to be cured, the sick person will never fully cast off
the sick role. Here illness meanings and uses are an integral and habitual part
of the disease, which itself is inseparable from coping style and personality.
Somatization, at least to a minor degree, is unavoidable in chronic illness for
this reason, and probably alternates, even in the same person, with its opposite,
denial and minimization of symptoms. Social situations and personal and cultural
significance of symptoms as much as personality and coping variables doubtless
influence this swing from amplification to damping.
If we understand Major Depressive Disorder as disease, at least as construed in
DSM-III, and somatization as iUness, then where does neurasthenia fit in? I will
argue that neurasthenia is both illness, a disease-generated and socially and
cuturally shaped type of somatization, and disease, a category in China's medical
classificatory system and in WHO's ICD-9 as well. This double status, I believe,
provides neurasthenia with some of the particular qualities that our study
detected. But I also wish to suggest that neurasthenic somatization may at times
represent cultural idiom and psychosocial coping style in the absence of disease/
illness. I did not study this interesting aspect of neurasthenia in China, but I
think it is an important subject for research on normal populations, family
relations and child and adult development: the learned practical daily life
pattern of talking about distress and help.
The patients in our sample experienced symptoms which at one time or
another they (and members of their family and social network) came to believe
were those of 'neurasthenia' or some related neurological disorder. Headaches,
lack of energy, weakness, insomnia, dizziness, and a variety of other complaints,
if they cannot be diagnosed as due to a specific organic lesion, do not respond to
treatment, especially if they become subacute or chronic, and interfere with
normal social activities and relations, seem to be viewed (with more or less
agreement) in the lay culture as 'neurasthenia". This is what we learned from the
ethnographic interviews with our patients and those who accompanied them.
Lacking a formal ethnography of neurasthenia in particular communities in
China, we must do our best with these quite limited accounts. This popular
sickness category implies a common physical disorder (weakness or exhaustion
174 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
that neurasthenia replaced traditional medical categories that played the same
role at an earlier time before the biomedical paradigm became dominant in
China. This substitution would be an excellent subject for historical research on
culture change. Neurasthenia, moreover, reflects other core cultural themes
and processes such as the emphasis on interpersonal relations over intrapsychic
concerns, the view that intimate personal revelation outside the family is shame-
ful, the dominance of externalizing cognitive coping processes over internalizing
ones, the practical situation-oriented cognitive style, the special stigma of
mental illness, the strong concern with health maintenance of physical well
being through nutrition and diet, exercise, abstinence, and taking medicine, etc.
Elsewhere I have offered a cultural analysis of neurasthenia as a symbolic form
in Chinese culture based on my work and that of many others with overseas
Chinese (Kleinman 1980), and I have no reason not to believe much the same
could be said about China. The upshot is that cultural as much as social and
psychobiological determinants construct neurasthenia illness experience as
one that is primarily somatic. I think this point is amply supported by the
findings from our study on symptom idiom, expressed versus elicited complaints,
Explanatory Models of etiology and pathophysiology, and patterns of help
seeking. This does not mean that individuals do not experience or have insight
into psychosocial problems but that these are treated as secondary.
Among the forces maintaining neurasthenic somatization is the work-disability
system in China. Here it would seem, if our findings are replicated elsewhere in
China, that chronic illness behavior provides the worker with some additional
leverage, even if not of a very great amount, over a system that otherwise does
not contain many opportunities and means for changing jobs, getting out of very
difficult work situations and stresses, resolving lengthy family separations due to
different and distant work sites, and getting time off with compensation. Only
field research in the work place in China will adequately test this hypothesis.
The fact that many of the patients in our sample continued to demonstrate
illness behavior even when their symptoms had been improved seems best
explained by the fact that their work (and also family or school) situations had
not changed for the better and in a number of instances had actually worsened.
While some patients were obviously and somewhat crudely using their illness
behavior to openly manipulate the work system, the great majority I do not
believe were consciously doing so. Nor do I feel that most of the former were
malingering. It is just that illness behavior opens up additional options for
dealing with the work system and these come into play, as it were, virtually
automatically because of the cultural salience of illness among Chinese. Leader-
ship and co-workers appear to be genuinely concerned about a worker's health
status and sensitive to the difficulties and dangers of working while sick. They
must recognize that certain work situations may create or exacerbate sickness,
176 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
and where feasible they probably attempt to meliorate these conditions, espe-
cially for vulnerable individuals. This care-oriented view is supported by the
ideology and sociopolitical structure of Chinese Communist society as much
as by abiding cultural values. Furthermore, now that the terribly hard years of
famine and serious economic and social instability are no longer acutely present,
perhaps there is more salience to illness as a work problem and fewer barriers
to assuming the sick role than in earlier years in the People's Republic. In the
aftermath of the Cultural Revolution, when virtually every family or social
network possessed someone deeply hurt by this national tragedy, perhaps there
is also an additional concern to help those who were among its victims, if an
opportunity to do so arises, as for example when they experience work diffi-
culties created or worsened by illness. That only two patients openly suggested
in their Explanatory Models that change of work might improve their illness,
whereas many regarded it as the result of work problems, indicates that this is
not a subject for direct negotiation but one that is handled indirectly in terms of
a sanctioned illness, not work, idiom.
In the event, the work disability system in China could not respond fully
or immediately to illness needs or there would be enormous dislocations and
probably active and widespread malingering. Rather like many work-disability
systems worldwide, America's included, there must be sufficient impediments,
difficulties, and length of time involved in trying to change work through illness
as well as uncertainty of outcome, including the possibility of very limited gain,
no gain, or creating a worse work or ffmancial situation, so that this option is
not exercised routinely. It was apparent to me that the patients in our study
recognized that these were very substantial obstacles and had sought work relief
only after a long period of sickness with substantial disability. That many had
still not succeeded in changing their work situations illustrates the practical
reality of barriers to change in this key social system. I believe this is quite
similar to the situation chronic pain patients confront in the United States,
though obviously the specific deterrents and the levers for coping with the
system must differ in these markedly different socioeconomic settings.
Another 'benefit' of chronic illness behavior in Chinese culture is worth
noting. There is a long tradition in China of individuals claiming sickness as a
reason to withdraw from dangerous political situations to a safer life of retire-
ment. Not only did a number of famous Confucian ministers of early Chinese
governments do this, but as one of the epigrams at the front of this paper
suggests, Mao himself did this several times. Several of the patients I interviewed
seemed to have utilized their illness behavior this way during the Cultural
Revolution. For a few cadres chronic neurasthenia distanced them from the fire
of criticism that had threatened to consume them as it did so many others, but
for most it seems to have had quite temporary and not very successful results.
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 177
How do we know how long DSM-III will last? Perhaps ten years from now what you call
Major Depressive Disorder may be regarded as something entirely different . . . perhaps
Phobic Disorder or something as yet unheard of. Look at Briquet's Syndrome: first hysteria,
then Briqet's, finally Somatization Disorder. For us it has remained hysteria.
University of Washington
NOTES
1. This research project would not have been possible without the unstinfing, persistent
and gracious support of Professors Ling Min-yu, Yang Derson, and Shen Qijie and their
colleagues in the Department of Psychiatry, Number Two Affiliated Hospital, Hunan
Medical College, Changsha, People's Republic of China. Special acknowledgement must
go to the three postgraduate research psychiatrists who assisted me in the day-to-day
conduct of the study: Drs. Zheng Yenping, Miao Jinsheng, and Dai Tze-shu (who is
now at the Hangzhou Psychiatry Hospital). From the initial translation of the interview
schedules to the last of the follow-up interviews, their competence, enthusiasm, hard
work and unflagging patience assured that the research would reach a successful
conclusion. Whenever we ran up against problems, the thoughtful and sensitive counsel
of Dr. Yang Derson usually helped settle matters quickly and often prevented me from
making cross-cultural blunders. I wish also to thank Dr. Wang Peng-chen, Vice-Director,
Hunan Medical College, and Wang Po, Director of the Number Two Affiliated Hospital,
for their free hospitality to me and my family. None of these individuals are responsible
for the ideas expressed in this paper, with certain of which they may disagree; I alone
assume that responsibility.
The research was funded by a grant from the Committee on Scholarly Communica-
tion with the People's Repubfic of China, National Academy of Sciences. To Halsey
Beemer and Bob Geyer of the Committee I wish to express my genuine appreciation.
Finally I aeknowiedge with pleasure the support of the University of Washington,
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 183
which made it feasible for me to free up the time spent from early June to late Septem-
ber 1980 in the field.
2. This study is part of the collaborative research and scholarly exchange program be-
tween the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington,
and the Department of Psychiatry, Hunan Medical College. The program includes a
series of studies of depression of which this is the first.
3. Neurasthenia seems to have held an important place in Russian neuropsychiatry in the
past, where it was underpinned by the theories of Pavlov and neurophysiologically-
oriented psychiatrists, who were widely translated into the Chinese psychiatry litera-
ture, and still is a component of contemp0miT Soviet psychiatry. For example, the
dissident psychiatrist, Semyon Gluzman, in a very recent paper written from his
internal exile in Siberia, has mentioned "simple conflict reactions (situational neuroses),
characterized by affective instability, irritability, nervousness, tension, low moods,
low productivity, and sometimes depression (all these symptoms fall into the so-called
neurasthenia complex described b y Soviet authors)" (Gluzman 1982: 60). One of my
Chinese colleagues attributed the idea of cortical asthenia directly to Pavlov (Yang
Derson personal communication). And in his wrifiugs Pavlov does relate neurasthenia
and hysteria to cortical weakness and inhibition; but fascinatingly, Pavlov recognized,
at least in the case of hysteria, that the neurophysiological mechanism "makes the
patient take refuge in illness in order to escape the difficulties of life and owing to
which this pathological state may in the end become irremediably habitual." (Pavlov
1957: 539) Thus, even Pavlov's strict neurological psychology includes an awareness
of the socialuses of illness, a point no doubt not lost on his Chinese psychiatric readers.
4. Depression has been used variously to mean a common mood, a pathological affect and
a disorder. This ambiguity plagued earlier accounts as much as did different diagnostic
criteria used to make the diagnosis of depressive disease. The term clinical depression
is used to refer to a disorder. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Number III of
the American Psychiatric Association, depression (like Caesar's Gaul) is divided into
three parts: (1) Bipolar Disorder, formerly called Manic-Depressive Disorder, a disease
involving both depression and mania, which in a mild form may be called Cyclothymic
Disorder, (2) Dysthymic Disorder (formerly Depressive Neurosis), a chronic disturbance
of mood that is not of sufficient severity and duration to meet the criteria for (3)
Major Depressive Disorder. The diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder are:
(A) Dysphoric mood or loss of interest or pleasure in all or almost all usual activities
and pastimes. The dysphofic mood is characterized by symptoms such as the following:
depressed, sad, blue, hopeless, low, down in the dumps, irritable. The mood disturbance
must be prominent and relatively persistent, but not necessarily the most dominant
symptom, and does not include momentary shifts from one dysphoric mood to another
dysphofic mood, e.g., anxiety to depression to anger, such as are seen in states of acute
psychotic turmoil.
(B) At least four of the following symptoms have each been present nearly every
day for a period of at least two weeks:
(1) poor appetite or significant weight loss (when not dieting) or increased appetite
or significant weight gain,
(2) insomnia or hypersomnia,
(3) psychomotor agitation or retardation,
(4) loss of interest or pleasure in social activities, or decrease in sexual drive,
(5) loss of energy; fatigue,
(6) feelings of worthlessness, self reproach, or excessive or inappropriate guilt,
(7) complaints or evidence of diminished ability to think or concentrate, such as
slowed thinking, or indecisiveness not associated with marked loosening of
association or incoherence,
184 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
5. These two examples were given me by my colleagues Professors Charles Keyes and E.
Valentine Daniel, respectively.
6. Because I regard hypochondriasis as a symptom constellation, a common form of
somatizing that is either part of a primary psychiatric disorder (e.g., Major Depressive
Disorder, Panic Disorder, Somatization Disorder) or of socially learned and determined
illness behavior (e.g., Chronic Pain Syndrome) and not a disorder on its own, I did not
specifically diagnosis patients as suffering from this problem. Hence the diagnosis does
not appear on Table IV with other DSM-III diagnoses. But as Table XV discloses,
51% of the 93 cases with all forms of depression had hypochondriacal preoccupation
including disease fears and bodily preoccupation. Since virtually all these patients also
had somatization and persistent pursuit of medical care, they would make the DSM-III
criteria for Hypochondriasis. However, it seems more availing to me to view disease
fears as a specific mode of somatizing, since just about every somatizer has the other
characteristics attributed by DSM-III's authors to hypochondriasis. In this respect
one might regard such cases as a particular style of phobic (or hypochondriacal)
somatization associated with depression, or as a hypochondriacal form of acute,
subacute, or chronic somatization (Rosen et al. •982). A point in favor of the first
view is that many of the patients with hypochondriacal fears experienced decrease ha
these fears as part of their general symptom improvement after treatment with tricyclic
antidepressants, suggesting that the hypochondriasis was secondary to their Major
Depressive Disorder.
7. To assure anonymity, I have altered some of the identifying details in each case.
8. In a remarkable and quite comprehensive article on the philosophy of medicine in
China from 1930 to 1980, Qiu Renzong (1982), a philosopher at the Chinese Academy
of Social Sciences in Beijing, shows that among medical philosophers and theoretieians
the discourse on disease and mind/body relations is a great deal more complex and
discriminating than what I have described as the views of practitioners and patients.
Qiu notes that the ascendency of Parlor's ideas in the 1950s reflected both the
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 185
REFERENCES
Beck, A.
1971 Cognition, Affect and Psychopathology. Archives of General Psychiatry/ 24:
495 -500.
Binitie, A.
1975 A Factor-Analytical Study of Depression Across Cultures (African and European).
British Journal of Psychiatry 127: 559-563.
Binmer, D. ¢t al.
1980 Systematic Treatment of Chronic Pain with Antidepressants. Henry Ford Hospital
Medical Journal 28: 15-21.
Boyd, J. H. and M. Weissman
1981 Epidemiology of Affective Disorders: A Reexamination and Future Directions.
Archives of General Psychiatry 38: 1039-1046.
Brown, G. W. and T. Harris
1978 Social Origins of Depression. New York: Free Press.
Cart, J. E.
1978 Ethno-Behaviorism and the Culture-Bound Syndromes: The Case of Amok.
Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 2: 269-293.
Carroll, B. et al.
1981 A Specific Laboratory Test for the Diagnosis of Mehncholia. Archives of General
Psychiatry 38: 15-22.
Chang, Y. H. et al.
1975 Frigophohia: A Report of 5 Cases. Bulletin of the Chinese Society of Neurology
and Psychiatry 1(2): 13.
Cheung, F. M. et al.
1981 Somatization among Chinese Depressives in General Practice. International
Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 10: 361-374.
Climent, C. E. et al.
1980 Mental Health in Primary Health Care. WHO Chronical 34: 231-236.
Demexs, R. et al.
1981 An Exploration of the Depth and Dimensions of Illness Behavior. Journal of
Family Practice 11: 1085-1092.
Depue, R. A. ed.
1979 The Psychobiology of the Depressive Disorders. New York: Academic Press.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 1st Edition (DSM-I)
1952 Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2nd Edition (DSM-II)
1968 Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition (DSM-III)
1980 Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Diamond, S.
1964 Depressive Headaches. Headache 4: 255-258.
Eastwood, M. R.
1971 Screening for Psychiatric Disorder. Psychological Medicine 1 : 197-208.
Ebigbo, P. O.
in press Somatization among Nigerian Normals and Mentally I11. Culture, Medicine and
Psychiatry.
Eisenberg, L.
1977 Disease and Illness. Distinctions Between Professional and Popular Ideas of
Sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 1: 9 - 2 4 .
El-Islam, M. F.
1969 Depression and Guilt: A Study at an Arab Psychiatric Clinic. Social Psychiatry
4(2): 56-58.
1975 Culture Bound Neurosis in Qatari Women. Social Psychiatry 10: 25.
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 187
Frolic, M.
1981 Mao's People. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Gluzman, S.
1982 Fear of Freedom: Psychological Decompensation or Existential Phenomenon?
American Journal of Psychiatry 139: 5 7 - 6 1 .
Goldberg, D.
1979 Detection and Assessment of Emotional Disorders in a Primary Care Setting.
International Journal of Mental Health 8: 3 0 - 4 8 .
Goldberg, D. P. and B. Blackwell
1970 Psychiatric Illness in General Practice. British Medical Journal 2: 4 3 9 - 4 4 3 .
Good, B. J.
1977 The Heart of What's the Matter. The Semantics of Illness in Iran. Culture, Medi-
cine and Psychiatry 1: 2 5 - 2 8 .
Heelas, P. and A. Lock
1981 Indigenous Psychologies: The Anthropology of the Self. New York: Academic
Press.
Hesbacher, P. T. et al.
1975 Social Factors and Neurotic Symptoms in Family Practice. American Journal of
Public Health 65: 1 4 8 - 1 5 5 .
Hill, O. W. and L. Blendis
1967 Physical and Psychological Evaluation of 'Non-Organic' Abdominal Pain. Gut
8: 221.
Hoeper, E. W. et al.
1979 Estimated Prevalence of RDC Mental Disorder in Primary Care. International
Journal of Mental Health 8: 6 - 1 5 .
Hunan Medical College
1981 Foundations of Psychiatry, Volume 1. Changsha, People's Republic of China:
Hunan Scientific and Technological Publishers.
lzard, C. E.
1979 Cross-Cultural Perspective on Emotion and Emotion Communications. In Hand-
book of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 3, Basic Processes. H. C. Triandis and W.
Lonner (eds.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Jackson, W. W.
1969 Galen - On Mental Disorders. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
5: 3 6 5 - 3 8 4 .
Jackson, W. W.
1980 Two Sufferers' Perspectives on Melancholia: 1690s to 1790s. In Essays in the
History of Psychiatry. E. R. Wallace and L. C. Pressly (eds.), Columbia, South
Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
Katon, W. and A. Kleinman
1981 Doctor-Patient Negotiation and Other Clinical Social Science Strategies in Primary
Care. In The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine, L. Eisenberg and A.
Kleinman (eds.), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.
Katon, W. et al.
1982 Depression and Somatizalion: A Review, Parts I and II. American Journal of
Medicine 72: 1 2 7 - 1 3 5 , 2 4 1 - 2 4 7 .
Kleinman, A.
1977 Depression, Somatization and the New Cross-Cultural Psychiatry. Social Science
and Medicine 11: 3 - 1 0 .
1978 Recognition and Management of Illness Problems. In Psychiatric Medicine Update:
Massachusetts General Hospital Reviews for Physicians. T. C. Manschreck (ed.),
pp. 2 3 - 3 2 . New York: Elsevier.
1980 Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
188 ARTHUR KLEINMAN
Klerman, G. L.
Ms The Pathophysiology of Depression. Merminger Prize Award Lecture, American
College of Physicians, 1981.
Kupfer, D. and F. Foster
1972 Interval Between Onset of Sleep and Rapid Eye Movement Sleep as an Indicator
of Depression. Lancet 2: 684.
Left, J.
1981 The Language of Emotion. In Psychiatry Around the Globe. J. Left, pp. 4 2 - 5 .
New York: Marcel Dekker.
Lesser, I. M.
1981 A Review of the Alexithymia Concept. Psychosomatic Medicine 43: 5 3 1 -
544.
Lin, K. M. et al.
1981 Overview of Mental Disorders in Chinese Cultures: Review of Epidemiological
and Clinical Studies. In Normal and Abnormal Behavior in Chinese Culture. A.
Kleinman and T. Y. Lin (eds.), pp. 237-272. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel
Publ. Co.
Lin, K. M. and A. Kleinman
1981 Recent Development of Psychiatric Epidemiology in China. Culture, Medicine and
Psychiatry 5: 135-144.
Lin, T. Y. and M. C. Lin
1981 Love, Denial and Rejection: Responses of Chinese Families to Mental Illness. In
Normal and Abnormal Behavior in Chinese Culture. A. Kleinman and T. Y. Lin
(eds.), pp. 3 8 7 - 4 0 1 . Dordrecbt, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.
Lindsay, P. G. and M. Wykoff
1981 The Depression-Pain Syndrome and Its Response to Antidepressants. Psycho-
somatics 22: 5 7 1 - 5 7 7 .
Lutz, C.
1982 The Domain of Emotion Words on Ifaluk. American Ethnologist 9(1): 1 1 3 -
128.
Manson, S. et al.
in press Relationship Between Ethnopsychiatric Data and Research Diagnostic Criteria
in the Identification of Depression Among American Indians. In The Diagnostic
Endeavor: Anthropological Applications to the Psychiatric interview. R. W.
Morris (ed.), (Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association
Meeting, Los Angeles, 1981).
Mark, J. et al.
1979 Determinants of the Ability of General Practitioners to Detect Psychiatric Illness.
Psychological Medicine 9: 337.
Marseila, A. J.
1979 Depressive Experience and Disorder Across Cultures. In Handbook of Cross-
Cultural Psychology. Psychopathology, Volume 6. H. C. Triandis and J. G.
Draguns (eds.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Marshland, D. W. et al.
1976 Content of Family Practice: A Data Bank for Patient Care, Curriculum and
Research in Family Practice - 526, 196 Patient Problems. Journal of Family
Practice 3: 2 5 - 6 8 .
Mathew, R. J. et al.
1981 Physical Symptoms of Depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 139: 2 9 3 -
296.
Mechanic, D.
1980 The Experience and Reporting of Common Physical Complaints. Journal of
Health and Social Behavior 21: 146-155.
NEURASTHENIA AND DEPRESSION 189
Singh, G.
1968 The Diagnosis of Depression. Punjab Medical Journal 18: 5 3 - 5 9 .
Starkman, M. N. et al.
1981 Depressed Mood and Other Psychiatric Manifestations of Cushing's Syndrome.
Psychosomatic Medicine 43: 3 - 1 8 .
S~ernbach, R. A.
1974 Pain Patients, Traits and Treatment. New York: Academic Press.
Stoeclde, J. and G. E. Davidson
1962 Bodily Complaints and Other Symptoms of Depressive Reaction. Journal of
American Medical Association 1 8 0 : 1 3 4 - 1 3 9 .
Suomi, S. J. et al.
1978 Effects of Imipramine Treatment of Separation-Induced Social Disorders in
Rhesus Monkeys. Archives of General Psychiatry 35: 3 2 1 - 3 2 5 .
Targun, S. D. et al.
1982 Neuroendocrine Interrelationships in Major Depressive Disorder. American
Journal of Psychiatry 139: 2 8 2 - 2 8 6 .
Teja, J. S. et al.
1971 Depression Across Cultures. British Journal of Psychiatry 119: 253-260.
Turkington, R. W.
1980 Depression Masquerading as Diabetic Neuropathy. Journal of the American
Medical Association 248: 1147-1150.
Von Knoring, L.
1965 The Experience of Pain in Depressed Patients. Neuropsychobiology 1: 155-165.
Ward, N. et al.
1979 The Effectiveness of Tricyclie Antidepressants in the Treatment of Coexisting
Pain and Depression. Pain 7: 3 3 1 - 3 4 1 .
Waziri, R.
1973 Symptomatology of Depressive Illness in Afghanistan. American Journal of
Psychiatry 130: 2 1 3 - 2 1 7 .
Weissman, M. et al.
1981 Depression and Its Treatment in U.S. Urban Community 1975-1976. Archives of
General Psychiatry 38: 4 1 7 - 4 2 1 .
Wen, J. K. and C. L. Wang
1981 Shen-k'uei Syndrome: A Culture-Specific Sexual Neurosis in Taiwan. In Normal
and Abnormal Behavior in Chinese Culture. A. Kleinman and T. Y. Lin (eds.),
pp. 3 5 7 - 3 6 9 . Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.
White, G. M.
1982 The Ethnographic Study of Cultural Knowledge of'Mental Disorder'. In Cultural
Conceptions of Mental Health and Therapy. A. Marsella and G. M. White (eds.),
Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.
Widmer, R. B. and R. J. Cadoret
1978 Depression in Primary Care: Changes in Pattern of Patient Visitsand Complaints
During a Developing Depression. Journal of Family Practice 7: 2 9 3 - 3 0 2 .
Widmer, R. B. and R. J. Cadoret
1979 Depression in Family Practice: Changes in Pattern of Patients Visits and Com-
plaints During Subsequent Developing Depressions. Journal of Family Practice
9: 1017-1021.
Yap, P. M.
1965 Phenomenology of Affective Disorder in Chinese and Other Cultures. In Trans-
cultural Psychiatry. A. V. S. DeReuck and R. Porter (eds.), pp. 8 6 - 1 1 4 . Boston:
Little Brown.