Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Biotechnology Letters, Vol 19, No 1, January 1997, pp.

45–47

11
Fermentation parameters influencing
higher alcohol production in the
tequila process
Leticia Pinal1, Miguel Cedeño2, Humberto Gutiérrez3 and
11 Jaime Alvarez-Jacobs1*
1
División de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco
(CIATEJ), Av. Normalistas 800, Guadalajara Jal. 44270 MEXICO. 2Destiladora González González, Puerto Altata
1131, Guadalajara Jal. 44330 MEXICO. 3Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e
Ingeniería, Universidad de Guadalajara, Blvd. Marcelino García Barragán y Calz. Olímpica, Guadalajara Jal. 44840
MEXICO.

In the fermentation process of tequila, the type of yeast strain, the temperature (30 or 35°C) and the C/N ratio
(62 or 188) had a significant influence in the level of higher alcohols produced. On the contrary, other parameters
11 like nitrogen source [urea or (NH4)2SO4] and inoculum amount (5% or 10%), have little or no influence on the produc-
tion of the compounds responsible for some of the organoleptic properties of tequila.

Introduction Yeast growth


Tequila is a distilled beverage derived from the fermen- Both strains were grown in a tequila production
tation of the cooked core of the blue agave (Agave tequil- medium, in which 51% of the sugar came from cooked
ana Weber), in which the main source of fermentable agave juice and the rest from standard table sugar (96%
sugar is fructose. As in many other alcoholic fermenta- sucrose) plus 1g (NH4)2SO4/ l. The final sugar content
11 tions, along with ethanol production several compounds was 54 g/l. The growth time was 24 h for solid culture,
are produced, conferring to the final product particular after which a loopful was taken to inoculate flasks with
organoleptic characteristics (Romano and Suzzi, 1993). 180 ml of broth, for a 10-hour cultivation in an orbital
Among these compounds, some of the most important, shaker at 30°C and 250 rpm. The final population using
are the higher alcohols, nevertheless having a high thres- a Neubauer chamber was 240–250 × 106 cells/ml with
hold, they usually appear in relatively high amounts. 100% viability.
Several reports have been published, regarding the
production of higher alcohols, in beer (Engan, 1981),
in wine, as well as in distilled beverages, and it is Fermentation
commonly accepted that the formed amounts of such Experiments were performed using a 25 factorial
11 compounds depend on the nitrogen metabolism and arrangement. The variables and their levels were: Strain,
culture conditions (Berry and Watson, 1991). However, winery and bakery; temperature, 30 and 35°C; C/N,
very little is known about the tequila process (Cedeño, 62/1 and 188/1; nitrogen source, (NH4)2SO4 and urea,
1995). In this work we present results about the influ- inoculum amount, 5% and 10%. Fermentation was
ence of process parameters, such as type of yeast strain, carried out in 1 l erlenmeyer flasks with 800 ml of initial
temperature, inoculum size, C/N ratio and type of volume, for 24 hours, after which time, the amount of
nitrogen source in the final level of isobutyl alcohol, higher alcohols was determined. The culture medium
isoamyl alcohol and ethanol in agave fermented wort. was similar to that used for growth, with the exception
of the final sugar concentration, 108 g/l.
Materials and methods
11 Strains used Analytical procedures
Saccharomyces cerevisiae L-041 (isolated from wine broth) Total reducing sugars were determined by the
and L-047 (from bakery), belong to the CIATEJ phenol/sulfuric acid technique. Total alcohols were also
1 Collection of Strains and Genes. determined using the potassium dichromate procedure.

© 1997 Chapman & Hall Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 1 · 1997 45


L. Pinal et al.

11 Ethanol and higher alcohols were determined by gas 1970; Ramsay and Berry, 1981). Ethanol production
chromatography with flame ionization detector. started in the the first hours of the fermentation kinet-
ics, ending along with the growth. It was also found,
Statistical analysis for both higher alcohols determined, that production
An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed started when the sugar level substantially lowered, and
according to Montgomery (1991), using the Statgraphics continued for several hours after the alcoholic fermen-
software. The response variables were final concentra- tation ended.
tions of isoamyl and isobutyl alcohol .
These results are consistent with the findings reported
11 Results and discussion for other beverages, in which the higher alcohols appear
Preliminary kinetic experiments at this stage of the alcoholic fermentation (Paterson and
Kinetic experiments in fermentation conditions (35°C, Piggott, 1989). This suggests a change of the metabolic
C/N 188/1 using ammonium sulfate, 10% v/v inoculum) status of the yeast, since the generation of these prod-
were performed, in order to determine growth, viability, ucts is a consequence of the activation of the aminoacid
sugar consumption and ethanol and higher alcohol pro- metabolism (Berry and Watson, 1991).
duction. Similar growth, viability, sugar consumption
and ethanol production was found for both strains. These findings confirm the empirical belief in the tequila
However, different amounts of higher alcohols were industry, that tequila produced with a slow fermenta-
produced by strains L-041 and L-047 (figures 1 and 2), tion process (24 hours or more) is richer in flavor and
11 consistent with several reports for alcoholic beverages, aroma, in comparison with that produced in a fast
in which different strains produced different amounts of process (18 to 20 hours). It is also clear that there is
higher alcohols (Engan, 1981; Kunkee and Amerine, an important difference in higher alcohol production

11

Figure 1 Sugar consumption and ethanol and higher Figure 3 Pareto diagrams for isoamyl alcohol production.
alcohol production by strain L-041.

11

11

Figure 2 Sugar consumption and ethanol and higher


1 alcohol production by strain L-047. Figure 4 Pareto diagram for isobutyl alcohol production.

46 Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 1 · 1997


Fermentation parameters influencing higher alcohol production in the tequila process

11 between the two strains used, which supports the idea The type of nitrogen source, the amount of inoculum
that the type of yeast employed plays an important role and the combination of these factors, had little or no
in the organoleptic characteristics of tequila, perhaps significant effect on isoamyl or isobutyl alcohols, in
more important than the type and amount of agave used. agreement with several reports (Berry and Watson,
1991).
Evaluation of fermentation conditions
The influence of the different parameters tested was The different fermentation parameters tested in this
evaluated by an ANOVA test. The results were summa- study are perhaps five of the most important, however,
rized in the Standardized Pareto diagrams depicted in there are others of importance, as the carbohydrate
11 figures 3 and 4. The ‘effect level’ in the Pareto diagrams composition: in the 100% agave type of tequila the
is the difference in higher alcohol production between sugar source is only fructose from inuline, in contrast
the two levels of the variable tested (i.e. 30 and 35°C), with the ‘mixed’ type having up to 49% of other kinds
divided by the standard deviation. of sugars, mainly sucrose. It is well known that the
100% agave has a higher amount of volatiles. The real
It is clear that the most important factor influencing both effect of the carbon source remains to be studied.
higher alcohol production is the strain used, followed by
C/N ratio and the combination of both factors. There are
several reports in distilled and in non- distilled beverages
that agree with these results, which are not surprising, Acknowledgement
11 since higher alcohol production is an intrinsic property One of the authors (L.P.), held a scholarship from
of the metabolism of each strain. Five-fold differences in CONACYT, México.
higher alcohol production by brewery yeasts had been
reported (Engan, 1981; Ramsay and Berry, 1981).
References
Regarding C/N ratio, it was found, for both strains, that Berry, D.R. and Watson, D.C. (1991), Production of
low C/N levels result in low amounts of isoamyl alcohol: Organoleptic Compounds. In: Yeast Biotechnology. Berry, D.R.,
19 mg/l in strain L-041 and 30 mg/l for L-047 vs. 27 Russell, I. and Stewart, G.G. eds. Allen & Unwin. London.
and 64 mg/l respectively for high C/N level. These Cedeño, M. (1995), Crit. Revs. Biotechnol, 15,1–11.
trends are also valid for isobutyl alcohol production. Engan, S. (1981), Beer Composition. In: Brewing Sciences., Pollock,
J.R.A. ed. vol. 2. pp. 94–104. Academic Press, London.
11 High C/N ratio mean a low nitrogen level, which might Kunkee, R.E. and Amerine, M.A., (1970), Yeast in Wine Making.
provoke deamination reactions of aminoacids, leading In: The Yeast. Rose, A.H. and Harrison, J.S. Academic Press.
to the synthesis of higher alcohols, according to previous London.
reports (Ouchi et al., 1980; Ramsay and Berry, 1981). Montgomery, D.C. (1991), Design and Analysis of Experiments. John
Wiley and Sons Inc. USA
Temperature was another factor with significant effect Ouchi, K., Yamamoto, Y., Takagishi, M., and Akiyama, H.
(1980). J. Ferment Technol, 58, 301–309.
on higher alcohol production, as well as the association Paterson, A. and Piggott, J.R. (1989), The Contribution of the
of this parameter with other variables, such as strain and Process to Flavor in Scotch Malt Whisky. In: Distilled Beverage
C/N ratio. For instance: in isoamyl alcohol production, Flavor. Piggot, J.R. and Paterson, A. eds. Ellis Horwood Ltd.
at 30°C the produced amounts were 21 and 39 mg/l for Chichester, England.
strains L-041 and L-047 respectively; while at 35°C, the Ramsay, C. and Berry, D.R., (1981), Physiological Control of
11 Higher Alcohol Formation in Scotch Whisky Fermentation.
values were 23 and 57 mg/l. It is well documented that In: Current Developments in Yeast Research. Stewart, G.G. and
this variable has an clear role in the formation of volatile Russell, I. Pergamon Press. London, Canada.
compounds (Engan, 1981). Romano, P. and Suzzi, G. (1993), J. of Appl. Bacteriol. 75, 541–45.

11

Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 1 · 1997 47

You might also like