Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OCP Posthearing Brief - Attacgment A - 734489-1607539
OCP Posthearing Brief - Attacgment A - 734489-1607539
OCP Posthearing Brief - Attacgment A - 734489-1607539
ATTACHMENT A
PUBLIC VERSION
ATTACHMENT A-1
PUBLIC VERSION
Implied Change in Import and US price Associated with Elasticity of Substitution and Relative Import to US Volume Change
(Revised to Extend Analysis Back to 2017)
Elasticity of substitution from Staff Report 5.0 5.0 C = Midpoint of Staff Estimate = (percent change in relative volume (A) / percent change in relative price (B))
Implied percent change in relative price [ ] B = denominator of EOS formula, or A/C‐‐Determinded by EOS formula, and "A" and "C" inputs.
4. Calculate US Price Implied by 2018 and 2019 import prices and Implied % Change in Relative Price
US to import relative price
Year 1 actual relative prices [ ] D = USAUV / SUIMPAUV (Year 1)
Percent change [ ] B = EOS
Year 2 Relative price implied by Change in Relative Volume and EOS [ ] E=D+B*D
Implied US Price in Year 2 associated with relative volume lost to subject imports [ ] G
Price decrease or (increase) due to relative volume loss to subject imports [ ] K = H-G
% of decrease in US producers' AUV attributable to subject imports [ ] L = K/J
Residual price decrease due to demand and other non-import factors [ ] M = 1-L
Note: "Year 1" is 2017 in the 2017-2018 comparison, and 2018 in the 2018-2019 comparison. "Year 2" is 2018 in the 2017-2018 comparison, and 2019 in the 2018-2019 comparison.
Sources: Mosaic Prehearing Brief, Exhibit 2 (Capital Trade Analysis), Attachment 11. We note that Petitioners appeared to have entered the wrong AUVs for 2019: their exhibit reports a subject import
shipment AUV of [ ], but Tables IV-7 and C-1 report [ ], and it reports a domestic industry AUV of [ ] while Tables IV-7 and C-1 report [ ].
PUBLIC VERSION
Implied Change in Import and US price Associated with Elasticity of Substitution and Relative Import to US Volume Change‐‐MAP
(Revised to Include Alternate Elasticity of Substitution)
Implied percent change in relative price [ ] B = denominator of EOS formula, or A/C‐‐Determinded by EOS formula, and "A" and "C" inputs.
4. Calculate US Price Implied by 2019 import price and Implied % Change in Relative Price
US to import relative price
2018 actual relative prices [ ] D = USAUV / SUIMPAUV (2018)
Percent change [ ] B = EOS
2019 relative price implied by Change in Relative Volume and EOS [ ] E=D+B*D
Implied US Price in 2019 associated with relative volume lost to subject imports [ ] G
Price decrease or (increase) due to relative volume loss to subject imports [ ] K = H-G
% of decrease in US producers' AUV attributable to subject imports [ ] L = K/J
Residual price decrease due to demand and other non-import factors [ ] M = 1-L
Sources: Mosaic Prehearing Brief, Exhibit 2 (Capital Trade Analysis), Attachment 11; Saad Ahmad and David Riker, “Updated Estimates of the Trade Elasticity of Substitution,” Economics Working Paper Series,
Working Paper 2020–05-A, U S. International Trade Commission Office of Economics, May 2020.
PUBLIC VERSION
Implied Change in Import and US price Associated with Elasticity of Substitution and Relative Import to US Volume Change‐‐DAP
(Revised to Include Alternate Elasticity of Substitution)
Implied percent change in relative price [ ] B = denominator of EOS formula, or A/C‐‐Determinded by EOS formula, and "A" and "C" inputs.
4. Calculate US Price Implied by 2019 import price and Implied % Change in Relative Price
US to import relative price
2018 actual relative prices [ ] D = USAUV / SUIMPAUV (2018)
Percent change [ ] B = EOS
2019 relative price implied by Change in Relative Volume and EOS [ ] E=D+B*D
Implied US Price in 2019 associated with relative volume lost to subject imports [ ] G
Price decrease or (increase) due to relative volume loss to subject imports [ ] K = H-G
% of decrease in US producers' AUV attributable to subject imports [ ] L = K/J
Residual price decrease due to demand and other non-import factors [ ] M = 1-L
Sources: Mosaic Prehearing Brief, Exhibit 2 (Capital Trade Analysis), Attachment 11; Saad Ahmad and David Riker, “Updated Estimates of the Trade Elasticity of Substitution,” Economics Working Paper Series,
Working Paper 2020–05-A, U S. International Trade Commission Office of Economics, May 2020.
PUBLIC VERSION
ATTACHMENT A-2
PUBLIC VERSION
Table II-5a
Imports
MOROCCO
Aggregation
Imports:
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
U.S. shipments:
Commercial shipments:
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Export shipments:
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Table II-6a
Imports
RUSSIA
Aggregation
Imports:
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
U.S. shipments:
Commercial shipments:
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
Export shipments:
Quantity [ ]
Value [ ]
ATTACHMENT A-3
PUBLIC VERSION
ATTACHMENT A-4
PUBLIC VERSION