Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wang 2007
Wang 2007
Abstract: In this study, a calcium phosphate cement (CPC), strength of the cement increased, and the degradation of the
consisting of partially crystallized calcium phosphate (PCCP), cement decreased. The cement was implanted into the tibia
was synthesized. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform tubercle of healthy mature Zelanian white rabbits and the his-
infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and scanning electronic micro- tological specimens were obtained after 4 and 16 weeks of im-
scope (SEM) were used to characterize the cement. The results plantation. The result revealed that this bone cement was bio-
showed that by changing the ratio of amorphous calcium compatible and showed very early osteoconductive proper-
phosphate (ACP) to PCCP in the cement, hydrated products ties. Thus, the CPC has potential for use in orthopedic surgery
of controllable crystallinity were obtained. With increase in for filling non- load-bearing bone defects. Ó 2007 Wiley Peri-
the relative amount of PCCP, the hydrated products changed odicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 81A: 781–790, 2007
gradually from very poor crystallinity with little needle-like
hydroxyapatite (Hap) crystallites to relatively high crystallin- Key words: calcium phosphate; crystallinity; biodegrada-
ity with more needle-like Hap crystallites; the compressive tion; bone remodeling
Histological evaluation
Figure 1. XRD patterns of PCCP and ACP. Figure 3. XRD patterns of the as-prepared cements.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the hydrated cements. Figure 6. FTIR spectra of the hydrated cements.
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of (a) ACP, (b) PCCP, (c) DCPA and the hydrated samples. (d–h) correspond to CPC1,
CPC2, CPC3, CPC4, and CPC5, respectively.
Figure 8. Setting time of the cements. Figure 10. Variation of DTS and porosity with the content
of PCCP.
increase in the relative amount of PCCP, the DTS cement with rhBMP-2, after 4 weeks of implantation,
increased significantly (p ¼ 0.05) while the decrease in a large amount of cartilage had formed at interface
porosity was not significant (p ¼ 0.05) (Fig. 10). For the between the cement and the tissue, and part of the
cement with 50 wt % PCCP (CPC5) the DTS reached material was ossified. No inflammatory cells and fiber
6.5 6 0.6 MPa, and the porosity was (39.4 6 2.1)%. vesicles were found around the material (Fig. 13).
An ideal calcium phosphate must have a biodegra- After 16 weeks, no inflammatory cells and fiber
dation rate designed to match the cell/tissue growth vesicles was observed (Fig. 14). Fibrocartilage was
rates. Therefore, the biodegradation rate of the cement formed and parts of them had ossified, and a small
was characterized by means of mass loss test. The amount of trabecula bone was detected at this time.
mass loss (wt %) versus soaking time curves for the While, in the cement with rhBMP-2, after 16 weeks of
hydrated cements with different amount of PCCP implantation, histological findings showed that the
were plotted in Figure 11. With increase in the relative quantity of new bone increased and most of the carti-
amount of PCCP, the mass loss of the cement speci- lage were transformed into mature bone tissue. Inte-
mens, at a given soaking time, decreased (Fig. 11). grated trabecula bone and Haversian system were
Histological analysis of the results after 4 weeks of formed (Fig. 15). Furthermore, the percentages of
implantation showed that a small amount of cartilage bone ingrowth in the rabbits 16 weeks after implanta-
and fibroblast was formed with very little inflamma- tion for CPC4 cement without and with BMP-2 were
tory cells around the CPC4 cement (Fig. 12). For the (41.7 6 16.6)% and (71.7 6 21.0)%, respectively.
Figure 9. Compressive strength of CPC for different con- Figure 11. In vitro mass loss tests of the hydrated
serving time. cements.
Figure 12. Light microscopy photo of the CPC4 cement Figure 14. Light microscopy photo of the CPC4 cement
after implantation for 4 weeks. (HE stain, original magnifi- after implantation for 16 weeks. (HE stain, original magni-
cation 100). [Color figure can be viewed in the online fication 200). [Color figure can be viewed in the online
issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.] issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 13. Light microscopy photo of the cement with Figure 15. Light microscopy photo of the cement with
rhBMP-2 after implantation for 4 weeks. (HE stain, original rhBMP-2 after implantation for 16 weeks. (HE stain, origi-
magnification 200). [Color figure can be viewed in the nal magnification 100). [Color figure can be viewed in
online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley. the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.
com.] wiley.com.]
ally requires several months in vivo.39 Furthermore, 3. Hong YC, Wang JT, Hong CY, Brown WE, Chow LC. The
CPC4 with rhBMP-2 exhibited better early osteocon- periapical tissue reactions to a calcium phosphate cement in
the teeth of monkeys. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:485–498.
ductive properties and osteoinductive properties than 4. Jansen JA, de Ruijter JE, Schaeken HG, Van der Waerden JPCM,
that without rhBMP-2 (Figs. 12–15), indicating that this Planell JA, Driessens FCM. Evaluation of tricalcium phosphate/
cement is a good carrier for rhBMP-2. hydroxyapatite cement for tooth replacement: An experi-
In this article, we intended to focus our research on mental anomaly study. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995;6:653–657.
the relationship between the composition and phase 5. Fernandez E, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP, Driessens FCM, Planell JA,
Best SM. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:177–183.
evolution and the microstructure, mechanical strength, 6. Brown WE, Chow LC. A new calcium phosphate setting cement.
and setting time of the CPC system. Only short-term J Dent Res 1983;62:672.
animal studies have been carried out, with the results 7. Brown WE, Chow LC. Combinations of sparingly soluble cal-
showing that the cement has excellent biocompatibility. cium phosphates in slurries and pastes as mineralizers and
Nonetheless, long-term biocompatibility evaluations cements. US Patent 4,612,053, September 16, 1986.
8. Khairoun I, Driessens FCM, Boltong MG, Planell JA, Wenz R.
and the cytotoxicity of the cements should be carried Addition of cohesion promoters to calcium phosphate cements.
out. Also, the values of Affinity Index in the histological Biomaterials 1999;20:393–398.
analysis should be computed and, especially, the 9. Niedhart C, Maus U, Redmann E, Siebert CH. In vivo testing
resorbability tests of the CPCs in vivo should be carried of a new in situ setting b-tricalcium phosphate cement for
osseous reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:530–537.
out in the further work. The flexural strength of the
10. Wang XP, Ye JD, Wang H. Effects of additives on the rheo-
cements should also be determined if load-bearing logical pProperties and injectability of a calcium phosphate
applications are anticipated. Furthermore, the consis- bone substitute material. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Bio-
tency of the cement pastes should be tested according to mater 2006;8:259–264.
ASTM C 187-98. 11. Frayssinet P, Gineste L, Conte P, Fages J, Rouquet N. Short-
term implantation effects of a DCPD-based calcium phos-
phate cement. Biomaterials 1998;19:971–977.
12. Bai B, Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ. The use of an injectable, bio-
CONCLUSIONS degradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the pro-
phylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the
management of vertebral compression fractures. Spine 1999;
By changing the ratio between partially crystallized 24:1521–1526.
calcium phosphate (PCCP) and amorphous calcium 13. Kurashina K, Kurita H, Kotani A, Takeuchi H, Hirano M.
phosphate (ACP), a calcium phosphate cement with In vivo study of a calcium phosphate cement consisting of a-
controlled crystallinity was prepared. With the tricalcium phosphate/dicalcium phosphate dibasic/tetracal-
cium phosphate monoxide. Biomaterials 1997;18:147–151.
increase in the relative amount of PCCP, the crystal-
14. TenHuisen KS, Brown PW. Formation of calcium-deficient hy-
linity of the hydrated cement increased gradually droxyapatite from a-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials 1998;
from a very poor crystallinity to a higher crystallinity 19:2209–2217.
of Hap. With the increase of PCCP, more needle-like 15. Lu JX, Descamps M, Dejou J, Koubi G, Hardouin P, Lemaitre
HA were precipitated in the cement and at the same J, Proust JP. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phos-
time the compressive strength of the cements raised phate biomaterials in bone. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Bio-
mater 2002;63:408–412.
markedly. The results of the mass loss tests showed 16. Wenisch S, Stahl JP, Horas U, Heiss C, Kilian O, Trinkaus K,
that the biodegradation rate of the materials may be Hild A, Schnettler R. In vivo mechanisms of hydroxyapatite
controlled by changing the ratio of ACP and PCCP in ceramic degradation by osteoclasts: Fine structural micros-
the as-prepared cement. Histological studies in light copy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:713–718.
microscopy confirmed that this cement was both bio- 17. Bauer TW, Geesink RGT, Zimmerman R, McMahon JT.
Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of
compatible and bioactive. Furthermore, the cement components retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;
with rhBMP-2 exhibited excellent early osteoconduc- 73:1439–1452.
tive properties and osteoinductive properties. A con- 18. Markovic M, Takagi S, Chow LC. Formation of macropores
venient way of adjusting the crystallinity and degra- in calcium phosphate cements through the use of mannitol
dation performance of a CPC was shown in this crystals. Key Eng Mater 2001;192–195:773–776.
19. Takagi S, Chow LC. Formation of macropores in calcium phos-
study, whose results indicate that the CPC formu-
phate cement implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:135–139.
lated has the potential for use as a bone defect filler. 20. Nilsson M, Fernández E, Sarda S, Lidgren L, Planell JA.
Characterization of a novel calcium phosphate/sulphate bone
cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:600–607.
References 21. Xu HHK, Simon CG Fast-setting and anti-washout calcium
phosphate scaffolds with high strength and controlled macro-
1. Yuan HP, Li YB, de Bruijn JD, de Groot K, Zhang XD. Tissue pore formation rates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;68:725–734.
responses of calcium phosphate cement: A study in dogs. 22. Zhang Y, Xu HHK. Effects of synergistic reinforcement and
Biomaterials 2000;21:1283–1290. absorbable fiber strength on hydroxyapatite bone cement.
2. Friedman CD, Constantino PD, Jones K, Chow LC, Pelzer HJ. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:832–840.
Sisson GA. Hydroxyapatite cement II obliteration and recon- 23. Sarda S, Nilsson M, Balcells M, Fernández E. Influence of
struction of the cat frontal sinus. Arch Otolaryngol Head surfactant molecules as air-entraining agent for bone cement
Neck Surg 1991;117:385–389. macroporosity. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:215–221.
24. Landi E, Tampieri A, Celotti G, Sprio S. Densification behav- 32. Filho OP, Torre GP, Hench LL. Effect of crystallization on an
ior and mechanisms of synthetic hydroxyapatite. J Ceram Soc apatite layer formation of bioactive glass s45S5. J Biomed
2000;20:2377–2387. Mater Res 1996;30:509–514.
25. Yang J, Shi GX, Bei JZ, Wang SG, Cao YL, Shang QX, Yang 33. Yang QZ, Troczynski T, Liu DM. Influence of apatite seeds
GH, Wang WJ. Fabrication and surface modification of mac- on the synthesis of calcium phosphate cement. Biomaterials
roporous poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) 2002;23:2751–2760.
(70/30) cell scaffolds for human skin fibroblast cell culture. 34. Manley MT.Calcium phosphate biomaterials. In: Geesink RGT,
J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:438–446. Manley MT, editors. Hydroxyapatite Coatings in Orthopaedic
26. Bigi A, Bracci B, Panzavolta S. Effect of added gelatin on the Surgery. New York:Raven; 1993. pp 1–23.
properties of calcium phosphate cement. Biomaterials 2004; 35. Jarcho M. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue pros-
25:2893–2899. thetics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;157:259–278.
27. Takagi S, Chow LC, Hirayama S, Eichmiller FC. Properties of 36. Bauer TW, Geesink RGT, Zimmerman R, McMahon JT.
elastomeric calcium phosphate cement-chitosan composites. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of
Dent Mater 2003;19:797–804. components retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;
28. Del Real RP, Wolke JGC, ValletRegi M, Jansen JA. A new 73:1439–1452.
method to produce macropores in calcium phosphate 37. Oreffo ROC, Driessens FCM, Planell JA, Triffitt JT. Growth
ceramics. Biomaterials 2002;23:3673–3680. and differentiation of human bone marrow osteoprogenitors
29. Khairoun I, Driessens FCM, Boltong MG, Planell JA, Wenz R. on novel calcium phosphate cements. Biomaterials 1998;19:
Addition of cohesion promoters to calcium phosphate cements. 1845–1854.
Biomaterials 1999;20:393–398. 38. Daculsi G, LeGeros RZ, Heugheaert M, Barbieux I. Formation
30. Constantz BR, Ison IC, Fulmer MT, Poster RD, Smith ST, of carbonate apatite crystals after implantation of calcium
Wagoner MV, Ross J, Goldstein SA, Jupiter JB, Rosenthal DI. phosphate ceramics. Calcif Tissue Int 1990;46:20–27.
Skeletal repair by in situ formation of the mineral phase of 39. Jansen JA, de Ruijter DE, Schaeken HG, van der Waerden
bone. Science 1995;267:1796–1799. JPCM, Planell JA, Driessens FCM. Evaluation of tricalcium
31. Komath M, Varma HK. Development of a fully injectable cal- phosphate hydroxyapatite cement for tooth replacement: An
cium phosphate cement for orthopedic and dental applica- experimental animal model study. J Mater Sci Mater Med
tions. Bull Mater Sci 2003;26:415–422. 1995;6:653–657.