Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY Vol. 41 (2000), pp.

410 – 416
DOI: 10.1007/s002840010159 Current
Microbiology
An International Journal
© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2000

Combined Effect of Bacteriocins on the Survival of Various Listeria


Species in Broth and Meat System
Graciela Vignolo,1 Jorge Palacios,1 Marı́a E. Farı́as,1 Fernando Sesma,1 Ulrich Schillinger,2 Wilhelm Holzapfel,2
Guillermo Oliver1
1
Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos, CERELA, CONICET, Chacabuco 145, 4000 Tucumán, Argentina
2
IHT, Fed. Res. Centre for Nutrition, Engesserstr. 20, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany

Received: 17 March 2000 / Accepted: 26 June 2000

Abstract. The antilisterial efficiency of three bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria, lactocin 705
(produced by L. casei CRL705, 17000 AU/ml), enterocin CRL35 (produced by E. faecium CRL35,
17000 AU/ml), and nisin (2000 IU/ml), was tested in broth, individually and in combination against
Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua. Both Listeria species showed an initial decrease in
viable counts followed by the regrowth of the survivors after 1 h in the presence of each bacteriocin.
A greater antilisterial effect was observed when the bacteriocins were combined in pairs, maximal
inhibition being reached when nisin was involved. When a mix of the three bacteriocins was used,
no survivors were observed after 24 h of incubation. Similar results were obtained when the
bacteriocin combinations were tested in a meat system, indicating that the use of more than one LAB
bacteriocin in combination may be effective in preventing the spontaneous emergence of a bacte-
riocin-resistant Listeria population.

The ability of Listeria strains to grow at temperatures product, are effective in reducing Listeria populations
ranging from 1° to 45°C, their high salt tolerance, and and other spoilage or pathogenic microorganisms in
their ability to initiate growth at a relatively low pH model systems, the occurrence of relatively high num-
make these pathogens particularly difficult to control in bers of survivors or regrowth in food systems is gener-
food. A novel approach to the control of Listeria mono- ally observed. This induction of bacteriocin-resistant or
cytogenes and L. innocua in food is the use of antimi- tolerant strains and mutants [14, 15] may pose further
crobial bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria [4, 14]. problems in the use of bacteriocins in biopreservation. In
Several bacteriocins are bactericidal to foodborne patho- foods with a long shelf life, even a small number of these
genic strains of Listeria. However, certain features, such variant cells can multiply to high concentrations. How-
as the level of inhibition generally observed, the mode of ever, improved control of the target microorganisms and
bacteriocin action, and the development of bacteriocin- inhibition of bacteriocin-resistant strains and species can
resistant strains, require further examination. be obtained by using a combination of one or more
One of the concerns regarding the use of bacterio- bacteriocins. It is generally believed that the increased
cins is the development of highly tolerant and/or resistant resistance of the mutants is caused by alterations in the
strains. It has been observed that Listeria develops tol- cell envelope, including changes in the fatty acid com-
erance towards nisin and pediocin-like bacteriocins at position of the membrane [2, 9, 11]. The antilisterial
relatively high frequency in both laboratory media and activity of nisin has been reported, and the sensitivity of
foods [18, 23]. Depending on the strain and conditions L. monocytogenes to this bacteriocin has been observed
used, including the bacteria/bacteriocin ratio, mutation to be strain dependent [21].
frequencies of 10⫺6 have been reported [8, 10]. Although This paper reports that bacteriocins can be combined
bacteriocins, either produced in situ or added to the to produce a more effective antibacterial effect against
Gram-positive bacterial cells. Two non-nisin bacterio-
Correspondence to: G. Vignolo: E-mail: vignolo@cerela.org.ar cins, lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35, were tested
G. Vignolo et al.: Bacteriocins and Listeria Species 411

together with nisin on the survival of L. monocytogenes Kinetics of cell destruction by bacteriocins. Approximately 106
and L. innocua in Tryptic soy broth ⫹0.6% yeast extract cells/ml of L. monocytogenes FBUNT and L. innocua 7 in stationary
phase were inoculated in TSBYE (pH:6.5) containing either 17,000
and in a meat system. AU/ml of lactocin 705, 17,000 AU/ml of enterocin CRL35, or 2000
IU/ml of nisin. These bacteriocins were used individually or in com-
bination; the mixture contained equal AU/ml of each bacteriocin. At
Materials and Methods time intervals the survivors were enumerated on TSAYE medium after
Bacterial strains and culture conditions. Listeria monocytogenes appropriate dilutions in peptone water, and colonies were counted after
FBUNT (Facultad de Bioquı́mica, Quı́mica y Farmacia, Universidad 48 h of incubation at 30°C.
Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina), ScottA, WR129, SR215, and 4ab; L. Meat preparation and inoculation. Fresh lean meat was obtained
seeligeri WS2253 (Institute of Hygiene and Toxicology, IHT, from a local abattoir, aseptically minced, and stored at ⫺20°C. Ten-
Karlsruhe, Germany); and L. innocua 7, 11, 12 and L1PE (Unité de gram portions in saline solution (0.85% NaCl) were placed into stom-
Recherches Laitiéres et Génétique Appliqueé, INRA, France) were acher bags, and the final volume was then adjusted to 20 ml by the
used. They were stored at ⫺20°C in TSBYE (Tryptic soy broth, separate addition of 106 CFU/ml of L. monocytogenes FBUNT and the
supplemented with 0.6% yeast extract) plus 10% glycerol. Before use, purified bacteriocins individually or in combination. Individual con-
they were grown twice in TSBYE (pH: 6.7) at 30°C. Listeria strains centrations of the bacteriocins were 17,000 AU/ml for lactocin 705 and
used in this work were isolated from different food sources except L. enterocin CRL35, and 2000 IU/ml for nisin. When they were assayed
monocytogenes FBUNT, which was a clinical isolate. in combination, the final concentration were the addition. The bags
Preparation of bacteriocins. Lactocin 705 was prepared according to were stomached for 3 min and further incubated at 20°C for 24 h. The
the procedure described by Palacios et al. [16]. Briefly, an overnight survivors of Listeria were ennumerated in PALCAM agar at different
culture in MRS broth of L. casei CRL705, isolated from dry sausages, time intervals. Each test was run in duplicate, and mean values were
was heated to inactivate proteases and kill cells, and the adsorption- calculated.
desorption pH-depending methodology developed by Yang et al. [24]
was applied. The active extract was further subjected to RP-HPLC and
SDS-PAGE. Enterocin CRL35, produced by Enterococcus faecium Results
CRL35 isolated from cheese, was obtained after removing cells from
LAPTg broth [17] and precipitated with (NH4)2SO4 (60%) at 4°C. A
Ten strains of Listeria were tested for sensitivity against
Biogel-P6 column was used to separate ammonium sulfate, and the lactocin 705, enterocin CRL35, and differents concen-
bacteriocin preparation was then applied to a CM Sephadex cation trations of nisin (Table 1). Results indicated species and
exchanger column. The pooled concentrated fractions were then loaded strain differences when the well assay was employed,
on a C18 reverse-phase column [5]. Nisin (Nisaplin, 1 ⫻ 106 IU/g) was and the presence or absence of zones of inhibition was
kindly provided by Aplin & Barret Ltd. (Trowbridge, UK). Stock
recorded. While all Listeria strains were resistant to nisin
solutions (105 IU/ml) were prepared by solubilizing appropriate
amounts of powder in a 0.02 N HCl solution. The pH was adjusted to concentrations of up to 2000 IU/ml, only L. monocyto-
2.0 with 1 N NaOH; the solution was then filter-sterilized (pore size genes Scott A, WR129, SR215 and L. innocua 12 was
0.22 ␮m, Millipore) and stored at ⫺20°C. shown to be resistant to both non-nisin bacteriocins (lac-
Sensitivity of Listeria strains to bacteriocins. The well diffusion tocin 705 and enterocin CRL35) under the test condi-
assay in TSAYE (Triptic soy agar supplemented with 0.6% yeast tions. The strains of L. innocua tested were as resistant to
extract) was used to determine the sensitivity of the strains to lactocin nisin as the most resistant L. monocytogenes, whereas the
705 (17,000 AU/ml), enterocin CRL35 (17,000 AU/ml), and nisin at strain of L. seeligeri was more sensitive. Moreover, the
increasing concentrations (100 to 5000 IU/ml). Bacteriocin activity sensitivity to bacteriocins was found to be dependent on
(AU/ml) was tested as described below. Frequency of bacteriocin
resistants was determined by comparing the number of colonies arising
the culture medium. When MRS and TSBYE were com-
after 1 h with the original inoculum size. Insensitive variants of Listeria pared, higher numbers of survivors were counted in
strains were isolated by growing the strain in broth containing high AU TSBYE after 1 h of exposure to increasing concentra-
of a bacteriocin (17,000 AU/ml of lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35 tions of nisin than in MRS (data not shown). Out of the
and 2000 IU/ml of nisin) for three to four transfers and isolating different pH of the media, one explanation for this is the
colonies on an agar plate containing the bacteriocin. The presence or
absence of a zone of growth inhibition against 10 ␮l (about 170 AU of
presence of some components in MRS medium as so-
lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35 and 4 AU of nisin) of each prepa- dium acetate, which may synergistically inhibit Listeria,
ration was determined. with nisin increasing the overall effect. These results
suggest the importance of the specific conditions used to
Determination of bacteriocin activity. The activity of the purified
stock solutions of lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35 was determined determine the bacteriocin levels that allow good efficacy
by a spot-on-lawn method. Thirty microliter of each twofold dilution in foods.
was spotted onto an indicator lawn of L. monocytogenes FBUNT and L. monocytogenes FBUNT, Scott A and L. innocua
L. innocua 7 and incubated for 16 –18 h at 30°C. The indicator lawn 7 were selected to be tested with lactocin 705, enterocin
was prepared by adding 70 ␮l of an overnight culture to 7 ml of overlay
CRL35, and nisin, either individually or combined, in
TSBYE soft agar. The titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest
dilution giving a visible zone of inhibition of the indicator lawn and TSBYE broth. The results in Table 2 show that the action
was expressed in AU/ml. By this method, one IU of nisin was equiv- of bacteriocins on growing cells of Listeria was charac-
alent to 0.16 AU. terized by a two-phase response: an initial decrease in
412 CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY Vol. 41 (2000)

Table 1. Sensitivity of Listeria strains to different bacteriocins

Nisin (IU/ml) Lactocin 705 Enterocin CRL35


(AU/ml) (AU/ml)
Strains 100 500 1000 2000 5000 17,000 17,000

L. monocytogenes FBUNT ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹⫹ ⫹⫹ ⫹⫹
L. monocytogenes ScottAa ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹⫹ ⫺ ⫺
L. monocytogenes WR129a ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹⫹ ⫺ ⫺
L. monocytogenes 4ba ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹⫹ ⫹ ⫺
L. monocytogenes SR215a ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹ ⫺ ⫺
L. innocua 7b ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹⫹ ⫹⫹ ⫺
L. innocua 11b ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹⫹ ⫹⫹ ⫺
L. innocua 12b ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹ ⫺ ⫺
L. innocua L1PEb ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹⫹ ⫺
L. seeligeri WS 2253a ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫺ ⫹ ⫹⫹ ⫹

a
Strains from IHT, Karlsruhe, Germany.
b
Strains from INRA, France.
Inhibition of growth was expressed as follow: [⫺] negative, inhibition zone ⱕ5 mm; [⫹] between 6 and 12 mm; and [⫹⫹] between 13 and 20
mm.

Table 2. Bactericidal effectiveness of nisin, lactocin 705, and enterocin CRL35 to Listeria strains after incubation at 30°C in TSBYE broth
during 24 h

cfu/ml in TSBYE containing

Incubation Enterocin
time None Lactocin 705 CRL35 Nisin
Listeria species (h) (control) (17,000 AU/ml) (17,000 AU/ml) (2000 IU/ml)

L. monocytogenes FBUNT 0 8.8 ⫻ 105 8.0 ⫻ 105 6.2 ⫻ 105 6.5 ⫻ 105
1 1.4 ⫻ 106 8.2 ⫻ 102 9.3 ⫻ 102 6.5 ⫻ 102
24 2.5 ⫻ 109 8.0 ⫻ 103 7.5 ⫻ 104 2.5 ⫻ 105
L. monocytogenes Scott A 0 2.2 ⫻ 106 8.1 ⫻ 105 7.8 ⫻ 105 7.4 ⫻ 105
1 3.0 ⫻ 106 9.0 ⫻ 102 9.0 ⫻ 102 8.0 ⫻ 102
24 5.2 ⫻ 109 4.4 ⫻ 104 2.2 ⫻ 105 4.2 ⫻ 105
L. innocua 7 0 1.4 ⫻ 106 1.0 ⫻ 106 1.6 ⫻ 106 1.2 ⫻ 106
1 3.5 ⫻ 106 1.5 ⫻ 103 8.6 ⫻ 103 1.3 ⫻ 103
24 1.5 ⫻ 109 2.5 ⫻ 104 8.0 ⫻ 105 5.0 ⫻ 105

viable counts after 1 h, followed by a resurgence of higher in the presence of nisin and enterocin CRL35 than
growth to high cell numbers after 24 h. Lactocin 705 with lactocin 705.
(17,000 AU/ml) proved to be more effective in inhibiting As shown in Table 3, when bacteriocins were tested
the three Listeria strains than enterocin CRL35 and nisin. in combination, the mix of lactocin 705 ⫹ nisin and
Exposure of 8.0 ⫻ 105 viable cells of L. monocytogenes enterocin CRL35 ⫹ nisin was observed to be more
FBUNT to lactocin 705 showed less than one log cycle effective in preventing regrowth than lactocin 705 ⫹
of growth after 1 h. Although regrowth was observed in enterocin CRL35. Bactericidal effectiveness was ob-
all cases, this strain was more sensitive to the action of served only when lactocin 705 ⫹ enterocin CRL35 ⫹
bacteriocins than L. innocua. Nisin displayed the fastest nisin combined together were used. In this case, a dra-
rate of bactericidal action on L. monocytogenes FBUNT, matic inhibition of viable cells at 1 h after inoculation of
showing a maximum viability loss of 3 log units (i.e., the mix was detected, with no regrowth of any of the
99% cell destruction) achieved in 1 h, followed by lac- studied strains. However, when the two non-nisin bacte-
tocin 705 and enterocin CRL35 with a viability loss of riocins were used together, a higher number of survivors
approximately 2.9 and 2.7 log units in 1 h, respectively. was detected at 24 h than with the pairs containing nisin.
The survivors to each of these bacteriocins resumed L. monocytogenes FBUNT decreased from 1.0 ⫻ 106 and
growth, reaching high cell counts at 24 h, these being 9.8 ⫻ 105 cells/ml to less than 10 cells/ml when lactocin
G. Vignolo et al.: Bacteriocins and Listeria Species 413

Table 3. Bactericidal effectiveness of nisin, lactocin 705, and enterocin CRL35 combinations to Listeria strains after incubation at 30°C in
TSBYE broth during 24 h

cfu/ml in TSBYE containing

Lact 705
Lact. 705 Ent ⫹
Incubation None ⫹ Lact 705 CRL35 ent CRL35
Listeria species time (h) (control) ent CRL35 ⫹ nisin ⫹ nisin ⫹ nisin

L. monocytogenes FBUNT 0 8.8 ⫻ 105 1.0 ⫻ 106 1.0 ⫻ 106 9.8 ⫻ 105 1.0 ⫻ 106
1 1.4 ⫻ 106 8.0 ⫻ 101 2.0 ⫻ 101 4.0 ⫻ 101 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101
24 2.5 ⫻ 109 3.2 ⫻ 102 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101
L. monocytogenes Scott A 0 2.2 ⫻ 106 7.8 ⫻ 105 8.5 ⫻ 105 8.2 ⫻ 105 6.0 ⫻ 105
1 3.0 ⫻ 106 1.5 ⫻ 102 3.2 ⫻ 101 7.5 ⫻ 101 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101
24 5.2 ⫻ 109 8.6 ⫻ 102 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101 6.6 ⫻ 101 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101
L. innocua 7 0 1.4 ⫻ 106 9.5 ⫻ 105 1.0 ⫻ 106 9.8 ⫻ 105 9.0 ⫻ 105
1 3.5 ⫻ 106 3.4 ⫻ 102 7.8 ⫻ 101 1.8 ⫻ 102 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101
24 1.5 ⫻ 109 6.8 ⫻ 102 5.0 ⫻ 101 2.0 ⫻ 102 ⬍1.0 ⫻ 101

Table 4. Frequencies of resistant Listeria variants to bacteriocins added individually or in combination after 1 h at 30°C in TSBYE broth
during 24 h

L. monocytogenes L. monocytogenes
Bacteriocin FBUNT Scott A L. innocua 7

lact 705 1.0 ⫻ 10⫺3 7.0 ⫻ 10⫺4 1.5 ⫻ 10⫺3


Ent CRL35 1.5 ⫻ 10⫺3 7.0 ⫻ 10⫺4 1.0 ⫻ 10⫺2
Nisin 1.0 ⫻ 10⫺3 1.0 ⫻ 10⫺3 1.0 ⫻ 10⫺3
Lact 705 ⫹ ent CRL35 2.0 ⫻ 10⫺5 8.0 ⫻ 10⫺5 1.5 ⫻ 10⫺4
Lact 705 ⫹ nisin 4.0 ⫻ 10⫺5 9.6 ⫻ 10⫺5 3.5 ⫻ 10⫺4
Ent CRL35 ⫹ nisin 8.0 ⫻ 10⫺3 8.3 ⫻ 10⫺4 1.8 ⫻ 10⫺4
Lact 705 ⫹ ent CRL35 ⫹ nisin ⬍1.5 ⫻ 10⫺6 ⬍1.1 ⫻ 10⫺5 ⬍1.6 ⫻ 10⫺5

705 and enterocin CRL35 plus nisin respectively were FBUNT was obtained, a maximum being reached when
added. On the other hand, a final count of 3.2 ⫻ 102 a combination of the three bacteriocins was added (Table
cells/ml at 24 h was obtained when the two non-nisin 6). A bacteriostatic effect was observed when the bacte-
bacteriocins were assayed together. riocins were used individually in the meat system, while
Table 4 shows the frequencies of resistant Listeria a decrease in viable counts of approximately 2 log cycles
variants to bacteriocins after 1 h at 30°C in TSBYE after 3 h of incubation was produced with a reduction in
broth. Mutants of Listeria strains resistant to the mix cfu/g at 24 h of the pathogen between 49% and 60% of
containing the three bacteriocins showed a resistance the initial population. No viable counts of L. monocyto-
frequency of less than 1.0 ⫻ 10⫺5, whereas, when indi- genes FBUNT after 3 h of incubation were obtained
vidual bacteriocins were used, Listeria-resistant variants when the three bacteriocins were added together.
were observed to occur at a higher frequency (10⫺2–
10⫺4).
Discussion
When the sensitivity of variants of the three Listeria
strains to the bacteriocins under study in media contain- The Listeria strains studied in this work differed consid-
ing lactocin 705, enterocin CRL35, or nisin was re- erably in their sensitivity to nisin, lactocin 705, and
corded, the variants, depending upon the growth condi- enterocin CRL35. Similar results have been reported [3,
tions, showed cross-resistance to lactocin 705 and 21], indicating important strain differences in the degree
enterocin CRL35, but not to nisin (Table 5). The survi- of inhibition, showing that some Listeria strains are more
vors isolated from broth containing nisin were resistant sensitive to nisin than others. Moreover, the differences
only to this bacteriocin. in sensitivity showed no correspondence with either
When the same experiment was carried out in meat strain or serotype [6]. Regarding the kinetics of cell
slurry, a reduction of viable cells of L. monocytogenes destruction, it was observed that population decreased
414 CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY Vol. 41 (2000)

Table 5. Sensitivity of variants of Listeria strains to lactocin 705, enterocin CRL35, and nisin at 30°C in TSBYE broth

Isolated from broth


Listeria strains containing Lactocin 705 Enterocin CRL35 Nisin

L. monocytogenes FBUNT none ⫹⫹ ⫹⫹ ⫹


lactocin 705 ⫺ ⫺ ⫹
enterocin CRL35 ⫺ ⫺ ⫹
nisin ⫹ ⫹ ⫺
L. monocytogenes Scott A none ⫹ ⫹ ⫹
lactocin 705 ⫺ ⫺ ⫹
enterocin CRL35 ⫺ ⫺ ⫹
nisin ⫹ ⫹ ⫺
L. innocua 7 none ⫹ ⫹ ⫹
lactocin 705 ⫺ ⫹ ⫹
enterocin CRL35 ⫹ ⫺ ⫹
nisin ⫹ ⫹ ⫺

Sensitivity (⫹) and resistance (⫺) to bacteriocins were determined from the presence or absence of zone of growth inhibition against 10 ␮l
(about 170 AU of lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35 and 4 AU of nisin).

Table 6. Effectiveness of lactocin 705, enterocin CRL35, and nisin added individually or in combination to Listeria monocytogenes FBUNT in
meat slurry incubated at 20°C during 24 h

log cfu/g in meat

0h 3h 10 h 24 h

Control 5.89 7.30 8.65 9.96


Lactocin 705 5.70 4.80 4.90 5.11
Enterocin CRL35 5.00 4.20 4.50 4.95
Nisin 4.95 3.50 4.54 4.80
Lact 705 ⫹ ent CRL35 5.10 2.50 2.60 2.50
Lact 705 ⫹ nisin 4.90 2.70 2.80 2.80
Ent CRL35 ⫹ nisin 5.00 2.60 3.00 3.00
Lact 705 ⫹ ent CRL35 ⫹ nisin 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

initially and increased upon further incubation, these with the ability to form pores in bacterial membranes.
results being in agreement with those of Schillinger et al. Additional work is currently under way in our laboratory
[19], who reported a regrowth of survivors of L. mono- to determine the mechanism of cooperation between
cytogenes Scott A after exposure to nisin concentrations lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35, as well as their mode
between 10 and 500 IU/ml as well as with those of Song of action.
and Richard [20], who observed that survivors of L. From a practical point of view, considering the dif-
innocua resumed growth after the addition of nisin, pe- ference in the kinetics of inhibition and cross-resistance
diocin AcH, and enterococcin EFS2 to TSBYE broth. of the survivors, it is to be expected that the combined
Cross-resistance between bacteriocins has been ob- use of nisin plus one of these bacteriocins would result in
served when the sensitivity of Listeria variants to lacto- more efficient inhibition of Listeria. Even when nisin
cin 705, enterocin CRL35, and nisin was tested. Similar displayed the most rapid inhibitory activity at 1 h, the
results were obtained by Rekhif et al. [18], who reported survivors resumed growth, reaching the highest cell
that mutants of L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 resistant counts at 24 h. These results are similar to those found
to one of three bacteriocins tested (mesenterocin 52, with the kinetics of cell destruction of L. innocua, where
curvaticin 13, and plantaricin C19) diplayed more resis- nisin proved to be the most effective inhibitor in com-
tance to the two other, but not to nisin. Insensitivity of a parison with pediocin AcH and enterococcin EFS2, but
variant to lactocin 705 and enterocin CRL35 while re- nisin was also the bacteriocin that allowed the highest
taining sensitivity to nisin, and vice versa, may be asso- cell counts at 24 h [19].
ciated with the mechanism by which a bacteriocin enters Spontaneous resistant mutants to individual bacte-
the cell following binding to the cell surface, as well as riocins were observed to occur at a high frequency
G. Vignolo et al.: Bacteriocins and Listeria Species 415

(10⫺3–10⫺4), this occurrence being lower when combi- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


nations of two or three bacteriocins were used. These This study was supported by funds from PICT 98 N°09-04632 (AN-
results are in accordance with Schillinger et al. [19], who PCyT), Argentina. The authors would like to thank A.Y. Borchia for
observed variants of L. monocytogenes surviving nisin her excellent technical assistance, and Aplin and Barret Ltd. for the gift
action at a frequency of 10⫺3 to 10⫺4, but contradict the of a nisin sample.

findings of Harris et al. [8], who detected mutants of L.


monocytogenes resistant to 2000 IU/ml of nisin at a Literature Cited
frequency of 10⫺6 to 10⫺8. Nisin resistance response of 1. Abee T (1995) Pore-forming bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacte-
L. monocytogenes Scott A was reported to be correlated ria and self-protection mechanisms of producer organisms. FEMS
with membrane fatty acid composition, a significant re- Microbiol Lett 129:1–10
2. Abee T, Rombouts FM, Guihard G, Letellier L (1994) Mode of
duction in phospholipid content being observed [9, 11, action of nisin Z against Listeria monocytogenes Scott A grown at
22]. This resistance could be due to the inability of nisin high and low temperatures. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1962–1968
to form pores in more rigid membranes [1]. The results 3. Bankerroum N, Sandine WE (1988) Inhibitory action of nisin
presented here indicate that bacteriocins of lactic acid against Listeria monocytogenes. J Dairy Sci 71:3237–3245
bacteria in combination have a higher antibacterial action 4. Cintas LM, Casaus P, Fernandez MF, Hernández PE (1998) Com-
parative antimicrobial activity of enterocin L50, pediocin PA-1,
against Listeria strains than when used individually. nisin A, and lactocin S against spoilage and foodborne pathogenic
Hanlin et al. [7], studying the antibacterial efficiency of bacteria. Food Microbiol 15:289 –298
pediocin AcH and nisin against several Gram-positive 5. Farı́as ME, Farı́as RN, R. Holgado AP, Sesma F (1996) Purifica-
bacterial strains, assumed that a mixture containing more tion and N-terminal amino acid sequence of enterocin CRL35, a
“pediocin-like” bacteriocin produced by E. faecium CRL 35. Lett
than one bacteriocin would be bactericidal to more cells
Appl Microbiol 22:417– 419
in a sensitive population, since cells resistant to one 6. Ferreira MAS, Lund BM (1996) The effect of nisin on Listeria
bacteriocin would be killed by another. Moreover, monocytogenes in culture medium and long-life cottage cheese.
mainly synergistic effects were reported when the inter- Lett Appl Microbiol 22:433– 438
actions between pairs of bacteriocins from lactic acid 7. Hanlin MB, Kalchayanand N, Ray P, Ray B (1993) Bacteriocins of
lactic acid bacteria in combination have greater antibacterial ac-
bacteria were tested [13]. One possible explanation for
tivity. J Food Prot 56:252–255
the different effectiveness of bacteriocin pairs would be 8. Harris L, Fleming HP, Klaenhammer TR (1991) Sensitivity and
that the bacteriocins used in this study belong to different resistance of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115, Scott A and
classes, which vary considerably in the nature and se- UAL500 to nisin. J Food Prot 54:836 – 840
quence of amino acid residues: nisin, lactocin, and ente- 9. Mazzotta A, Montville TJ (1997) Nisin induces changes in mem-
brane fatty acid composition of Listeria monocytogenes nisin-
rocin are a lantibiotic (class I), a two-peptide bacteriocin
resistant strains at 10°C and 30°C. J Appl Microbiol 82:32–38
(class IIB), and a pediocin-like (class IIA), respectively 10. Ming X, Daeschel MA (1993) Nisin resistance of foodborne bac-
[12]. To avoid an inefficacious action of bacteriocins teria and the specific resistance responses of Listeria monocyto-
over a long time, our results suggest that a mixture genes Scott A. J Food Prot 56:944 –948
containing bacteriocins that belong to different classes 11. Ming X, Daeschel MA (1995) Correlation of cellular phospholipid
content with nisin resistance of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A. J
would be more effective in preventing regrowth of Lis-
Food Prot 58:416 – 420
teria in foods. 12. Moll GN, Konings WN, Driessen AJM (1999) Bacteriocins: mech-
The combined effect of lactocin 705, enterocin anism of membrane insertion and pore formation. Antonie Leeu-
CRL35, and nisin against L. monocytogenes FBUNT in wenhoek 76:185–198
meat slurry showed no viable counts after incubation for 13. Mulet-Powell N, Lacoste-Armynot AM, Viñas M, Simeon de
Buochberg M (1998) Interactions between pairs of bacteriocins
3 h. These results indicate that even when the effective- from lactic acid bacteria. J Food Prot 61:1210 –1212
ness of bacteriocins may be antagonized by many factors 14. Muriana PM (1996) Bacteriocins for control of Listeria spp. in
acting simultaneously (adsorption on meat components food. J Food Prot (Suppl), 54 – 63
and degradation by proteolytic enzymes), the industrial 15. Okereke A, Thompson SS (1996) Induced acid-tolerance response
application of combined, partially purified, and/or puri- confers limited nisin resistance on Listeria monocytogenes Scott A.
J Food Prot 59:1003–1006
fied bacteriocins in meat products may be a useful ap- 16. Palacios J, Vignolo G, Farı́as ME, R. Holgado AP, Sesma F (1999)
proach to reduce the frequency at which resistant popu- Purification and amino acid sequence of lactocin 705, a new
lations develop, to improve the hygiene standards, and to bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus casei CRL 705. Microb Res
extend the shelf life of meat and meat products. Although 154:199 –204
the use of nisin is permitted in more than 50 countries in 17. Raibaud P, Caulet M, Galpin JV, Mocquot G (1961) Experimental
conditions for nitrate reduction by certain strains of the genus
a variety of foods, other bacteriocins with different Lactobacillus. J. Gen Microbiol 24:285–291
and/or more effective antimicrobial activity may be con- 18. Rekhif N, Atrih A, Lefebre G (1994) Selection and properties of
sidered as new biopreservatives. spontaneous mutants of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313
416 CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY Vol. 41 (2000)

resistant to different bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria 22. Verheul A, Russell NJ, Van’t Hof R, Rombouts FM, Abee T
strains. Curr Microbiol 28:237–241 (1997) Modifications of membrane phpspholipid composition in
19. Schillinger U, Chung H-S, Keppler K, Holzapfel WH (1998) Use nisin-resistant Listeria monocytogenes Scott A. Appl Environ Mi-
of bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria to inhibit spontaneous crobiol 63:3451–3457
nisin-resistant mutants of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A. J Appl 23. Wan J, Harmark K, Davidson BE, Hillier AJ, Gordon JB, Wilcock
Microbiol 85:657– 663 A, Hickey MW, Coventry MJ (1997) Inhibition of Listeria mono-
20. Song H-J, Richard J (1997) Antilisterial activity of three bac- cytogenes by piscicolin 126 in milk and Camembert cheese man-
teriocins used at sub-minimal inhibitory concentrations and ufactured with a thermophilic starter. J Appl Microbiol 82:273–
cross-resistance of the survivors. Int J Food Microbiol 36:155– 280
161 24. Yang R, Johnson MC, Ray B (1992) Novel method to extract large
21. Ukuku DO, Shelef LA (1997) Sensitivity of six strains of L. amount of bacteriocin from lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ
monocytogenes to nisin. J Food Prot 60:867– 869 Microbiol 58:3355–3359

You might also like