Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of

chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or


intracytoplasmic sperm injection (Protocol)

Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S

This is a reprint of a Cochrane protocol, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane
Library 2005, Issue 2
http://www.thecochranelibrary.com

Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic
sperm injection (Protocol)
Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
HEADER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SOURCES OF SUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic i
sperm injection (Protocol)
Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[Intervention Protocol]

Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of


chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or
intracytoplasmic sperm injection

M Twisk, S Mastenbroek, van M Wely, MJ Heineman, Van der F Veen, S Repping

Contact address: Moniek Twisk M.D., Medical Doctor/Researcher, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center,
Meibergdreef 9 (H4-205), Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, NETHERLANDS. M.Twisk@amc.uva.nl.

Editorial group: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group.


Publication status and date: Unchanged, published in Issue 4, 2005.

Citation: Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening for
abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005291. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.

Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

ABSTRACT

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:

To review the effectiveness of PGS on livebirth rate in women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment.

BACKGROUND In PGS, embryos created in vitro are analysed for aneuploidies


and only those that show a normal number of chromosomes are
In both in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmatic sperm placed into the uterus. There are three approaches to obtain nuclear
injection (ICSI) selection of the most competent embryo(s) for material for the genetic analysis. One is the aspiration of the first
transfer is generally based on morphological criteria, such as the and second polar body from fertilized oocytes (Verlinsky 1995).
number of pronuclei, the number and regularity of blastomeres Another approach is the removal of one or two blastomeres from
and the percentage of fragmentation. However, many women fail embryos at early cleavage stage (Handyside 1989); at the moment
to achieve a pregnancy after transfer of morphologically good qual- the majority of centres performing PGS use cleavage-stage biopsy (
ity embryos. ESHRE 2002). A third approach is the removal of trophoblast cells
One of the presumed causes is that such morphologically normal at the blastocyst stage, although this approach is used infrequently.
embryos show an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploi- Removal of polar bodies, blastomeres or trophoblast cells requires
dies). Since the early eighties many reports have been published an opening in the zona pellucida. This opening can be created
showing a high number of numerical chromosome abnormalities chemically (with the use of acidic Tyrode’s solution), mechanically
in morphologically normal human cleavage stage embryos (Angell or with the use of a laser. The chromosomes that are analysed in
1983). Because most chromosomally abnormal embryos do not PGS differ between the different centres. Most centres screen 5 to
develop to term, preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploi- 10 chromosomes including chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y.
dies (PGS), also known as preimplantation genetic diagnosis for
aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS), was designed to improve preg- In the literature, PGS and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
nancy rates. (PGD) are often presented as similar treatments. Indeed the tech-
Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic 1
sperm injection (Protocol)
Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
nology used by both PGS and PGD is nearly identical. However, sperm extraction (TESE)-ICSI (Platteau 2004). These indications
PGS and PGD have completely different indications. As said, PGS were chosen because a relatively large amount of chromosome ab-
aims to improve pregnancy rates in subfertile couples undergoing normalities have been found in embryos of these women.
IVF/ICSI treatment. PGD, on the other hand, aims to prevent
Although IVF/ICSI with PGS has been available for over a decade
the birth of affected children in fertile couples with a high risk of
and is used more and more often (ESHRE 2002) its effectiveness
transmitting genetic disorders. In 1990 the first successful preg-
is still unclear. Therefore we aim to conduct a regularly updated
nancies after PGD were reported (Handyside 1990). The use of
systematic review to investigate whether PGS is an effective inter-
fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) for aneuploidy screening
vention leading to more live births per patient. In order to do so
was first described in 1993 (Munne 1993).
we will compare IVF/ICSI with PGS to IVF/ICSI without PGS.

So far, PGS has been suggested and used for the following in-
dications: (i) advanced maternal age (Gianaroli 1999; Kahraman
OBJECTIVES
2000; Munne 1999; Munne 2003; Obasaju 2001) (ii) repeated
IVF failure (Gianaroli 1999; Kahraman 2000; Pehlivan 2003) (iii) To review the effectiveness of PGS on livebirth rate in women
repeated abortions (Pellicer 1999; Rubio 2003) and (iv) testicular undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment.

REFERENCES

Additional references Munne 1993


Munne S, Weier HU, Griffo J, Cohen J. A fast and efficient
Angell 1983 method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization
Angell RR, Aitken RJ, van Look PF, Lumsden MA, of human blastomeres. Journal of Assisted Reproduction &
Templeton AA. Chromosome abnormalities in human Genetics 1993;10(1):82–90.
embryos after in vitro fertilization. Nature 1983;303(5915): Munne 1999
336–8. Munne S, Magli MC, Cohen J, Morton P, Sadowy S,
ESHRE 2002 Gianaroli L, et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation
ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Human
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data Reproduction 1999;14(9):2191–9.
collection III. Human Reproduction 2002;17(1):233–46. Munne 2003
Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Velila E, Walmsley
Gianaroli 1999
R, Sadowy S, et al. Improved implantation after
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munne S.
preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.
Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients
Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2003;7(1):91–7.
undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis:
identification of the categories for which it should be Obasaju 2001
proposed. Fertility and Sterility 1999;72(5):837–44. Obasaju M, Kadam A, Biancardi T, Sultan K, Fateh M,
Munne S. Pregnancies from single normal embryo transfer
Handyside 1989 in women older than 40 years. Reproductive Biomedicine
Handyside AH, Pattinson JK, Penketh RJ, Delhanty Online 2001;2(2):98–101.
JD, Winston RM, Tuddenham EG. Biopsy of human
Pehlivan 2003
preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification.
Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Romero J, Remohi
Lancet 1989;18(8634):347–9.
J, Simon C, et al. Impact of preimplantation genetic
Handyside 1990 diagnosis on IVF outcome in implantation failure patients.
Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2003;6(2):232–7.
Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos Pellicer 1999
sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344 Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F, Minguez Y, Gimenez C,
(6268):768–70. Egozcue J, et al. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation
Kahraman 2000 genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage:
Kahraman S, Bahce M, Samli H, Imirzalioglu N, Yakisn an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human
K, Cengiz G, Donmez E. Healthy births and ongoing preimplantation embryos. Fertility and Sterility 1999;71(6):
pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis 1033–9.
in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent Platteau 2004
implantation failure. Human Reproduction 2000;15(9): Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Van
2003–7. Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, et al. Comparison of the
Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic 2
sperm injection (Protocol)
Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
aneuploidy frequency in embryos derived from testicular
sperm extraction in obstructive azoospermic men. Human
Reproduction 2004;19(7):1570–4.
Rubio 2003
Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohi
J, Pellicer A. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo
development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Human
Reproduction 2003;18(1):192–8.
Verlinsky 1995
Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G,
Kovalinskaya L, et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception
diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ
hybridization. Human Reproduction 1995;10(7):1923–7.

Indicates the major publication for the study

SOURCES OF SUPPORT

External sources of support


• No sources of support supplied

Internal sources of support


• No sources of support supplied

Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic 3
sperm injection (Protocol)
Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

You might also like