1) The author disapproves of considering reinstating the death penalty in the Philippines during Duterte's presidency, as Catholic social teaching holds that all human life is sacred.
2) The death penalty disproportionately affects those living in poverty and often results in poorly handled cases due to overworked and underpaid public defenders. It also does not make society safer or guarantee that crime will decrease.
3) Catholic social teaching calls on citizens to ensure communities uphold the dignity of all people through just laws and systems. The author believes speaking out against the death penalty to elected officials is important to end it and allow victim's families to heal.
4) The death penalty negates Catholic
1) The author disapproves of considering reinstating the death penalty in the Philippines during Duterte's presidency, as Catholic social teaching holds that all human life is sacred.
2) The death penalty disproportionately affects those living in poverty and often results in poorly handled cases due to overworked and underpaid public defenders. It also does not make society safer or guarantee that crime will decrease.
3) Catholic social teaching calls on citizens to ensure communities uphold the dignity of all people through just laws and systems. The author believes speaking out against the death penalty to elected officials is important to end it and allow victim's families to heal.
4) The death penalty negates Catholic
1) The author disapproves of considering reinstating the death penalty in the Philippines during Duterte's presidency, as Catholic social teaching holds that all human life is sacred.
2) The death penalty disproportionately affects those living in poverty and often results in poorly handled cases due to overworked and underpaid public defenders. It also does not make society safer or guarantee that crime will decrease.
3) Catholic social teaching calls on citizens to ensure communities uphold the dignity of all people through just laws and systems. The author believes speaking out against the death penalty to elected officials is important to end it and allow victim's families to heal.
4) The death penalty negates Catholic
1) The author disapproves of considering reinstating the death penalty in the Philippines during Duterte's presidency, as Catholic social teaching holds that all human life is sacred.
2) The death penalty disproportionately affects those living in poverty and often results in poorly handled cases due to overworked and underpaid public defenders. It also does not make society safer or guarantee that crime will decrease.
3) Catholic social teaching calls on citizens to ensure communities uphold the dignity of all people through just laws and systems. The author believes speaking out against the death penalty to elected officials is important to end it and allow victim's families to heal.
4) The death penalty negates Catholic
One of the pressing issue today in the Philippines during Duterte’s
presidency is the consideration of death penalty to prisoners with grave offenses, which I greatly disapprove. The Catholic Church proclaims that human life is sacred, made in the image and likeness of God. I believe in the sanctity of human life and the inherent dignity of the human person is the foundation for all the principles of our social teaching. I believe that every person is precious, from the moment of conception to the moment of natural death. People are more important than the measure of every institution or policy. The death penalty threatens innocent life.
Death penalty disproportionately affects people living in poverty. Almost all
of the death row inmate’s attorney often lack experience, are overworked and underpaid. This often results in poorly handled cases. Besides, it doesn’t really guarantee that crimes would go down once it will be implemented again. It doesn’t make society safer. I think death penalty is something we, as community members, must not allow.
Catholic social teaching call us all to take active and responsible
participation in the way our communities function. The laws, systems and processes of government should reflect our call to live justly and uphold the dignity of all people. It is our responsibility to speak out for the inherent value of all life to our elected officials and demand to end the death penalty. Death penalty also doesn’t really bring closure to the victim’s families. As a Catholic, we should care for the victim’s family and to allow them to heal from the harm they experienced.
Death penalty negates the very foundation of Catholic Social Teaching,
that is to care and help other people. I think we should give people a chance to change and to find God within them. Removing it from them, who are we to have such right? We are all just human beings and we all deserve a chance to change. Kynna Claire J. Paclibar BS CpE-5A