(

atty señorita lakwatsera

"CARPE DIEM" ¡VIVIR EL HOY SIN PREOCUPARSE DEL MAÑANA!

! April 4, 2020

OCA vs Bermejo
O!ce of the Court Administrator vs Bermejo
A.M. No. P-05-2004 March 14, 2008

FACTS:
Respondent colluded with another person to impersonate her in taking the Civil Service Eligibility Exami‐
nation. During the examination, Bermejo used another name in taking the test while the other took the
same exam using Bermejo’s name.

ISSUE:
Is a certi!ed copy of the Seat Plan of the examination admissible in evidence?

RULING:
Yes. A duly accomplished Civil Service Form is a public document which is admissible in evidence.
Respondent in this case, fails to refute the documentary evidence proving the fact in issue, against her.
It is a settled rule that the duly accomplished form of the Civil Service is an o"cial document of the
Commission, which, by its very nature, is considered in the same category as that of a public document,
admissible in evidence without need of further proof. As an o"cial document, the entries thereof made
in the course of o"cial duty are prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.

Full text: OCA vs Bermejo A.M. No. P-05-2004 March 14, 2008

Advertisements

REPORT THIS AD

Share this:

! Twitter " Facebook

Like
Be the first to like this.

Related

REVISED POEA RULES AND REGU‐ Seaoil Petroleum Corp. vs. Auto‐ Bohanan vs. Bohanan
LATIONS GOVERNING THE corp Group In "Case Digests"
RECRUITMENT AND EMPLOYMENT In "Case Digests"
OF LANDBASED OVERSEAS FIL‐
IPINO WORKERS OF 2016
In "Case Digests"

" Case Digests, Philippine Jurisprudence, Remedial Law # 548 SCRA 219 $ 0 Comments

← Expertravel and Tours, Inc. vs. CA & KAL Phil. Educ. Co., Inc. vs. Soriano →

Leave a Reply

Enter your comment here...

Search … )

Recent Posts
% REVISED POEA RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE RECRUITMENT AND
EMPLOYMENT OF LANDBASED OVERSEAS FILIPINO WORKERS OF 2016
% IRR of Book III of the Labor Code
% REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7277, as amended by R.A. No. 10754
% Republic Act No. 7796
% JUVENILE JUSTICE AND WELFARE ACT OF 2006

Recent Comments
Cases on Evidence |… on People vs. Jack Racho

Cases on Evidence |… on People vs Mamantak

Cases on Evidence |… on Emma Lee vs. CA

Archives
& January 2021
& December 2020
& October 2020
& September 2020
& July 2020
& May 2020
& April 2020
& March 2020
& February 2020
& January 2020
& November 2019
& October 2019
& September 2019
& August 2019
& July 2019
& March 2019
& February 2019
& January 2019
& October 2016
& August 2016
& September 2013

Categories
" Audiobook
" Caramoan Tourism
" Case Digests
" Civil Law
" Commercial Law
" Constitutional Law
" Corporation Law
" Criminal Law
" Evidence
" Labor Law
" Law
" Legal Ethics
" Negotiable Instruments Law
" Philippine Jurisprudence
" Philippine Laws
" Remedial Law
" Rules of Court
" Special Proceedings
" Taxation Law
" Technology
" Transportation Law

Meta
' Register
' Log in
' Entries feed
' Comments feed
' WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
Close and accept
To !nd out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Follow