Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Domain e - Tpe 2
Domain e - Tpe 2
Aaron Mancilla
National University
023060682
Capstone 690
Abstract
An introduction is included of how I demonstrated competency for TPE 2.1 by using a paper
review. In this paper, I will also include research evidence on how I demonstrated competency.
Lastly, a reflection and how it has changed my teaching strategies and perception as a teacher.
Domain E: TPE 2.1 Artifact’s Supporting Documentation
Introduction
Competency for TPE 2.1 was demonstrated by presenting a paper review about
classroom management practices that foster a caring community. The paper review is a paper
that I wrote down during the course TED 626 Classroom Management back in 2015. On the
paper review I presented models to promote social-emotional growth and intervention methods.
On this paper I present four Discipline Models: Barbara Colorosco’s Backbone classroom
management and discipline, Kagan & Scott’s Win-Win Philosophy Discipline, Curwin &
Mendler’s Discipline with Dignity and Dianne Chelsom Gossen’s Restitution self-discipline.
The four Discipline models are student centered, promote the following disciplines; treat
students with dignity, make responsibility more important than obedience, model and teach the
behaviors you expect from your students, and make sure the discipline strategies are practical. I
demonstrate competency for TPE 2.1 by reflecting how each discipline model supports and
Explanation
teachers to have access and control to a classroom. Research based classroom management
discipline strategies encourage teachers to act ahead of time by designing a prevention plan. It
also encourages teachers to design an effective reaction plan. Without the implementation of an
effective classroom management discipline plan, teachers will lose teaching instruction time to
disciplining students during lessons. Marzano and colleagues believe that “effective teaching and
learning cannot take place in a poorly managed classroom” (Marzano, Marzano, & Pickering,
2003, p.1), for that reason is important to go over the rules of the class at the beginning of the
semester. I have not had a chance to implement this strategy. I have only substitute, but it is
Domain E: TPE 2.1 Artifact’s Supporting Documentation
fundamental for students to understand the consequences of breaking the rules. In my philosophy
as an educator is to use research based positive interventions that will prevent the students from
making the rules. When the students break the rules, they will know what to expect. One strategy
that will adjust students to the school routines is suggested by Blossom Nissman, “while sitting
in a circle with students, ask them to share their ideas of favorite activities in school. This
information can be used to set up the routine” (Nissman, 2009, p. 5). The focus of this strategy is
to help students discuss and analyze why the rules and procedures are and are not effective for
that class. This will also create self-awareness of issues and problems that students need to
address individually; this strategy demonstrate competency for TPE 2.1 as it fosters a caring
community.
Reflection
As a future teacher, I will implement the four discipline models. I believe that the
discipline models that focus on intervention are the most effective models. During my first year
as a teacher, I will research more research-based discipline models that promote self-discipline
and fosters a community. I once said that the same way we differentiating instruction, that the
same way we need to differentiate the methods of classroom management rules and procedures.
This to meet the needs of individual students, every need is different and therefore, addressing
them independently will have a positive affect for the entire classroom.
Reference
Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works:
Research-based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.