Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Military Engineering Support
Military Engineering Support
Military Engineering Support
Defence nationale
Canada
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
FOREWORD
2. If, in a CF operation, conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of subordinate
or environmental publications, this publication will take precedence, unless the NDHQ/J3, in consultation with
NDHQ/J3 Engr, provides more current and specific guidance.
3. The individual environments are responsible for the development and maintenance of their respective engineer
concepts and doctrine. Director Military Engineering (D Mil E), on behalf of the NDHQ/J3, is responsible for the
development and maintenance of military engineer support concepts and doctrine to CF operations.
D Mil E exercises this responsibility through the CF Doctrine Board (CFDB).
i/ii
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
PREFACE
1. The keystone doctrine manual, B-GG-005-004/AF-000 - Canadian Forces Operations states that CF doctrine
provides the fundamental tenets for the employment of military forces to translate the CF mission and strategic
objectives into action. More specifically, it provides commanders with underlying principles to guide their actions
in planning and conducting operations.
2. The CF will operate internationally as part of an alliance or coalition. Thus, CF doctrine should be consistent,
as far as practicable, with the doctrine of major allies to provide the capacity to conduct combined operations.
Similarly, B-GG-005-004/AF-015 - Military Engineer Support to Canadian Forces Operations should guide those
engineer operations conducted as part of an alliance or coalition with our engineer allies.
3. Operational effectiveness of military engineer forces specifically and the CF as a whole, depends on the
development of doctrine and sufficient personnel, training and equipment to employ them effectively. A fully
integrated approach to CF operations based on these tenets will achieve both unity of effort and maximum effect.
Procedures should be developed from doctrine so that they will be suitable for use in any operation, with only minor
changes to cater for different command structures or variations in force levels, structures and/or capabilities.
4. To ensure effective military engineer support is provided to any CF operation, it is essential that this engineer
doctrine which guides this integrated approach, is understood and practised. While environmental specific engineer
doctrines are separate bodies, they must be compatible.
iii/iv
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Section II - The Role, Functions, Tasks, Principles and Characteristics of Military Engineers 1-3
v
B-GG-005-004/AF-000
PAGE
vi
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
vii
B-GG-005-004/AF-000
PAGE
viii
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GL-E-1
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
ix/x
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 1
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
SECTION I
101. INTRODUCTION
a. Routine Operations. Routine operations are those operations for which a given Capability Component (CC)
has been specifically tasked, organized and equipped. Routine operations use existing command and
control (C2) relationships and there is no requirement to use joint terminology.
1. For the C2 of CF Operations, the CF has two permanent joint HQs, one static (NDHQ) and one deployable
(JHQ). The JHQ is intended primarily for employment on international contingency operations. When the JHQ, or
any portion thereof, is tasked to deploy, it is referred to as the JTFHQ. See also artilces 116, 118 and 119 of CF
Operations.
2. For C2 of domestic contingency operations, the CF has established eight formation based HQs. These HQs
might not be permanently established with appropriate, deployable C2 organizational structures. Should a domestic
operation require deployable C2 capabilities that are beyond their capacity, the JHQ will normally be tasked to meet
this requirement. See also artilces 116, 117 and 119 of CF Operations.
1. In peacetime, the operational elements of the CF may not be under the command of the agency that will
command them on operations. This is the case for contingency operations when the Aforce generators@ are tasked
to provide units / formations to the DCDS, the Aforce employer@. The mechanism by which units pass from OPCOM
of one agency to another is known as Transfer of Command Authority (TOCA) and is defined as the formal transfer
of a specified degree of authority over forces assigned to an operation between commanders of supporting elements
and the supported commander. The degree of authority transferred to the TFC, and the mechanism to effect TOCA,
will be determined by the CDS and specified in orders when deemed appropriate by the CDS and TFC.
2. TOCA takes place during the planning, generation and employment phases of an operation and is normally
effected through operational orders and instructions. In international contingency operations TOCA from Canadian
national command to coalition/alliance command will not be undertaken without Government of Canada authority.
TOCA is described in detail in chapter 2 - section III of CF Operations.
1-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. Command of combat units and support groups on contingency operations is vested in a TFC, in some cases
a JTFC, appointed by the CDS. In such operations, the DCDS has responsibility to coordinate on behalf of the CDS,
strategic level operational planning and CDS operational direction to the TFC. When the CDS establishes a TF, a
separate chain of command is activated which has the appointed TFC responding to the CDS. ECS may be tasked
to provide support to their forces assigned to an operation; however, they are outside the operational chain of
command, except if appointed as the TFC.
2. The TFC, appointed by the CDS, is the operational commander. In appointing the TFC, the CDS must
specify the mission, allocate the resources to execute that mission, and specify C2 arrangements, including the
delegation of authority and the allocation of personnel, agencies or elements which will enable the TFC to effectively
control resources to accomplish the mission. The TFC may have to deploy to a specific theatre or area of
operations, should circumstances require it. Alternatively, in situations where a headquarters exists in the theatre
or area of operations, it may be appropriate to operate out of fixed facilities. The TFC, aided by the NDHQ J Staff
in the planning and execution of the mission, requires a deployable TFHQ as well as communications and
administrative support units.
3. Commanders who are fully conversant with the tactics, techniques, capabilities, needs and limitations of
forces of their own Environments may have only limited knowledge of the tactics, techniques, etc. of the components
of a TF. Commanders, therefore, must be provided with a staff which will enable them to control resources from
other Environments and support agencies effectively. Military advice may also be provided by specialist liaison or
staff officers and by the commanders of subordinate, supporting or higher commands.
4. Command Relationships. Once a TF is established, a separate chain of command is created under the
TFC who reports directly to the establishing commander. This chain of command will then be activated at a time
determined at the strategic level and specified in orders through TOCA.
a. Prior to TOCA, the TFC is authorized to direct planning for the operation through the designated TFHQ and
designated supporting commanders. The designated supporting commanders retain their full range of
command responsibilities, but are responsive to the TFC for planning and preparing forces for the operation.
b. Once TOCA takes place, the TFC assumes the level of command and responsibility specified by the CDS.
The supporting commanders will remain responsible for the provision of certain functions and resources to
the TFC, using existing lines of communications (LOC) for these functions wherever possible and keeping
the TFC fully informed. Supporting commanders will maintain their usual responsibilities, minus the authority
and responsibility that have been transferred to the TFC.
5. Methodology. In general, the number of resources assigned, and the required degree of control over these
resources will depend on the task or mission assigned to a TFC. The C2 method used for an operation will depend
on the resources allocated to the operation, the degree of authority delegated to the TFC, the nature of the task or
mission, and the operational situation. The following two methods are available to the TFC for C2 of a TF.
a. Component Method. This method is the norm for joint contingency operations. Using the component
method, the JTFC exercises authority over a JTF through component commanders (JTF components are
assigned to JTFCs under OPCOM or OPCON). The JTFC issues broad operational directives to each of the
component commanders who then translate the directives into detailed plans and orders for their assigned
units. Each component has a separate headquarters as its control organization. The JTFHQ and
component HQs may be collocated or separate.
b. Direct Method. The direct method is an alternate method of command used in contingency operations
where the size, complexity, time span and mission of an operation is usually limited. It would be rare to
employ this method in international operations. The decision to employ the direct method will normally be
made in consultation with the ECS. According to this method, a TFC exercises command authority over
a TF directly by issuing detailed orders to subordinate elements. An appropriate staff and control facilities
are therefore required. In general, a TFC is provided with advice by his staff and by officers commanding
1-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
elements of the TF. The span of control that a TFC can effectively manage depends largely on the capacity
of the staff and the facilities available. A balance must be struck between the actual or potential span of
control and the extent of a commander's involvement in the detailed conduct of operations. If necessary,
commanders may delegate to subordinate commanders a level of command authority over elements of their
forces.
1-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
1. TFs at all levels require military engineer (engr) support. Military engrs provide support to intelligence,
operations, logistics and civil-military cooperation (CIMIC) activities. In a CF operation, environmental components
of the TF include organic engr elements to provide close support to tactical operations. Operational level military
engr capabilities and resources are required to provide general support to the TF. Military engr support throughout
the entire area of operations is coordinated by the TF Engr and his staff. Specialist engr support such as
architecture design, civilian contracting or fire protection services (FPS) which exceed the component engr
capabilities are part of the engr general support provided to the TF by the ESU.
1. The role of military engrs in operations is to assist friendly forces to live, move and fight, and to deny the
same ability to the enemy. Land force engrs have the secondary role of fighting as infantry when required.
2. Military engr support, as a whole, includes the entire spectrum of those functions of combat engineering,
airfield engineering, construction engineering, geomatics and fire protection services. The application of the princples
of employment will guide any of the three environmental component engrs in the type of engineering support given
to any operation.
1. Strategic Level. At the strategic level, NDHQ/J3 Engr, on behalf of the CDS, is responsible for planning
and coordinating engr support to CF operations.
2. Operational Level. In the area of operations, the TF Engr is responsible to the TFC for coordinating engr
support to the TF.
3. Tactical Level. The component engrs are responsible for coordinating tactical level engr support to the
components.
4. Military Engineer Support to Operations. Engr forces within theatre are divided into four major
components: the TF Engr Cell in the TFHQ, the ESU, component engrs, and augmentation engr forces. The
organization and role of component engrs are discussed in detail in environmental doctrine.
a. Maintain Mobility. Mobility involves those actions to support the ability of air, land and sea forces to move
and to conduct operations throughout the theatre at will. It can include mobility support to land formations,
construction and repair of facilities and utilities to support air operations, such as in Airfield Damage Repair
(ADR), and the provision of port facilities to support maritime operations.
1-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
skills, equipment and personel. It also includes construction support to deception operations. Survivability
must be carefully planned, coordinated and executed to enhance the security of the operational plan.
e. Geomatics. Geomatics are those scientific and engineering activities involved in the capture, storage,
analysis, processing, presentation, dissemination and management of geospatial information. As every
environmental component of a TF will require some form of military geographic information to conduct
operations, coordinated geomatics support is essential.
1. The following planning principles serve as a guide for the provision of engr support:
a. Centralized Coordination, Decentralized Execution. The execution of engr tasks requires careful control
and coordination of personnel, equipment and materiel. The most efficient use of scarce resources is
generally achieved through centralized coordination at the highest practicable level, with execution delegated
to the lowest practical level;
b. Allocation of Priorities. To ensure the best use of engr resources, commanders at each level must assign
priorities to all engr tasks. The completion of high priority tasks may require non-engr personnel to execute
lower priority tasks under military engr supervision;
c. Early Warning and Reconnaissance. The successful and timely completion of engr tasks depends upon
the availability of personnel, equipment and materiel. Good engr intelligence and timely reconnaissance are
also needed. Engrs must participate in the operation planning process from the onset since a surge of engr
effort is normally required at the beginning of an operation to establish basic services;
d. Logistic Support. The successful execution of engr tasks depends on the availability of a variety of
equipment, stores and materiel. Appropriate arrangements must be made to coordinate the supply,
maintenance and repair of military engr resources;
e. Communications. Communications are vital to engr commanders to allow them to command their widely
dispersed troops effectively, to review priorities, and to keep the TFC informed of engr matters. Engr
commanders must be able to receive reconnaissance reports and engr intelligence, issue orders quickly and
clearly, and receive regular progress reports; and
f. Continuity. The most effective and efficient means to complete engr tasks is to ensure the unit or personnel
that commence the task remain to complete the same task. Redeployment or reassignment of engr forces
breaks continuity, can cause delays or loss of inherent knowledge of the situation at hand.
2. The following organizational principles serve as a guide for the provision of engr support:
a. Close Support (CS). The first organizational principle of employing engr forces, is the "task organized"
concept of close support. It provides sufficient quantities of engr personnel, equipment and other task
specific resources to provide immediate engr support (mobility, counter-mobility and survivability) to assist
the TFC. This concept of close support can be equally applied to either of the land or air components of
an operation. Within the maritime component, there is only limited CS capability.
b. General Support (GS). The second related organizational principle, the concept of general support
encompasses the larger spectrum of the organization of an engr force to provide water supply, provision of
1-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
maintenance of MSRs, provision and maintenance of accomodations, utilities and services, provision of air
landing facilities, bulk water and fuel storage and EOD/BMD to the supported force as a whole. Regardless
of the location within the theatre of operations, the concept of general support could be applied by personnel
from any of the environmental components. A general support engr force may also reinforce the close
support engr capabilities if required. However, in the context of airfield engineering support, the breakdown
of CS and GS does not specifically apply due to the inherent capabilities within the AES structure.
1. The following are characteristics of all military engr support as they apply to the three environmental
components of TF operations:
a. Flexibility. The flexibility of engr units or elements result from their training and organizations. The ability
to regroup if necessary into the task organized role of close or general support allows for increased flexibilty
given the proper level of planning.
b. Mobility. The ability to provide intimate engr support to any force is usually a factor of the equipment and
vehicles possed by engrs units. Engr units generally carry a considerable quantity of equipment and stores
which must be retained on vehicles or moved by other means.
c. Reliance on Equipment and Stores. Complex engr equipment requires specially trained personnel. For
flexibility of employment, this equipment is held and operated by specialist engr units or elements and is
centrally controlled. Planning and coordination of non controlled engr stores is critical to successful
execution of tasks.
d. Skill. Engrs are highly skilled personnel requiring trained engr supervision. Misemployment of engrs is
detrimental to the success of any mission.
e. Vulnerability. Engr personnel, vehicles and equipment have limited protection. Engr tasks generally
require protection from other arms so as to efficiently and quickly complete tasks uninterrupted by enemy
actions.
f. Limitations. Engrs are trained to execute tasks by day and by night regardless of environmental weather
conditions. Reliance on equipment and personnel operability twenty-four hours a day is limited by equipment
failure and personal fatigue. Maintenance time for both is a must. Consideration of these factors must be
taken into account during planning of any engr operation.
1-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION III
1. Military engrs should be aware that their allies are equipped with a wide range of engr equipment and material
and that some standardization exists between nations. Engrs are also organized differently at each level of
command, and although engr missions are similar, procedures often differ. It is important in combined operations
that these differences are well understood and that their effect on the engr mission is kept to a minimum. For this
purpose, several important engr activities are covered by NATO Standardization Agreements (STANAGs) and
Quadripartite (American-British-Canadian-Australian) Standardization Agreements (QSTAGs). STANAGs and
QSTAGs covering engr procedures, and other related agreements, are listed in Annex B to this chapter.
2. Engr commanders must be aware of what is standard within NATO and ABCA, and follow the agreed
principles and procedures laid down. Where standardization has not been achieved interoperability may still be
feasible, either by adapting equipment for use with that of another nation, or by training one nation's engrs on the
equipment of another. The ability to interchange engr equipment and resources between nations, may increase their
combined effectiveness on the battlefield. Conversely, a lack of engr interoperability could hinder allied operations.
3. Compatibility of engr communications is important and may present serious problems for C2 in multinational
operations unless special provision to overcome them is made at the planning stage. Besides technical difficulties
in communicating, language barriers may add to the problems of C2. Therefore, the nomination of bilingual liaison
officers must be considered at the planning stage.
1. Within NATO and ABCA there is a wide range of engr equipment, munitions, and accessories, too great for
the engrs of any single nation to be completely knowledgeable.
2. According to their missions, engr specialists should be trained in the use of other nations' equipment and
systems. These measures will improve the level of understanding among allied engrs and enable them to cooperate
fully.
1-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
STANDARDIZATION AGREEMENTS
1. International Standardization Agreements. The Air and Army Boards of the NATO Military Agency for
Standardization (MAS), are responsible for standardization among NATO forces. All such agreements are published
as Standard NATO Agreements (STANAGS). The Army ABCA QUADRIPARTITE Standard Agreements (QSTAGS),
and QUADRAPARTITE Air Standardization Coordination Committee (ASCC) agreements complement the work of
the MAS Boards, and allow a two-way exchange between the programmes. These principles and procedures enable
military engineers to execute their role in joint and combined operations in a standard way.
2021 180 Military Computation of Bridge, Ferry, Raft and Vehicle Classifications
2430 Land Forces Combat Engineer Messages, Reports and Returns (AEngrP)
2368 Guide to the Restoration of Facilities on the Lines of Communications, Ports, and
other Critical Installations after Hostile Action
1A-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
2377 957 Procedure for the Management of an EOD Incident for use When Working With Other
Agencies
2389 958 Minimum Standards of Proficiency for Trained Explosive Ordnance Personnel
2391 EOD Recovery Operations on Fixed Installations (AEODP 5)
3863 Fire Protection Requirements for Fixed Wing Aircraft during Manned Aircraft Turn-
Arounds, Hot Refuelling, and Operations in Hardened Shelters with or without
Engines Running
3896 Illustrated Information on Fire Hazards and Rescue Features for NATO AC (AEP-11)
STUDY CFR Equipment and Procedures to Protect the Health of CFR Personnel during
7047 Operations
7049 Personnel Protective Equipment Together With Standard Operating Procedures for
CFR Operations in an NBC Environment
STUDY Minimum Requirements for CFR Operations in Support of Sortie Generation in a Post
7051 Attack Environment
1A-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
6. Geomatics Agreements.
STANAG QSTAG TITLE REMARKS
1022 963 Combat Charts, Amphibious Charts and Combat/Landing CA does not produce
Charts these charts
1A-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
3408 1179 Position Reference Systems for Aeronautical Charts QSTAG in for PSO
Promulgation
3600 1180 Topographical Land Maps and Aeronautical Charts 1:250 QSTAG in for PSO
000 for Joint Operations Promulgation
3666 DRAFT Maximum Sizes for Maps, Aeronautical Charts and Other Not implemented by
1148 Geographic Products (Excluding Nautical Charts) Canada at this time
(TBR)
3672 DRAFT Indexes to Series of Land Maps and Aeronautical Charts QSTAG being
548 and Indexes to MGID updated by UK
3675 3675 Symbols on Land Maps, Aeronautical Charts and Special QSTAG in for PSO
Naval Charts Promulgation
3677 3677 Standard Scales for Land Maps and Aeronautical Charts QSTAG in for PSO
Promulgation
1A-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
3833 DRAFT Symbols for Use on Maps of Training Areas for Land Canada QSTAG OPI
3833 Forces
7072 Digital Chart of the World (DCW)/(Background Display Canada has ratified
Data Set, Level - 0) Edition 1
1A-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
2017 508 Orders to the Demolition Guard and Demolition Firing Party Commander (Non-
Nuclear)
2036 518 Land Minefield Laying, Marking, Recording and Reporting Procedures
2990 820 Principles and Procedures for the Employment in Land Warfare of Scatterable
Mines With a Limited Laid Life (ATP-50)
8. Miscellaneous Agreements. The following Standardized agreements which are not specifically for
engineers but nevertheless are relevant to engineer operations:
2002 Warning Signs for the Marking of Contaminated or Dangerous Land Areas,
Complete Equipments, Supplies and Stores
1A-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 1
5621 Standards for the Interoperability of NATO Land Combat and Combined Operations
Systems
1A-7/1A-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 1
REFERENCES
d. B-GL-300-003/FP-000. Command.
e. B-GL-301-001/FP-001, Operations, Land and Tactical Air, Volume 1, Land Formations in Battle, Books
1 and 2.
f. B-GG-302-002/FP-002, Specific Operations, Volume 2, Arctic and Sub-arctic Operations, Part 2, Northern
Operations.
g. B-GL-302-003/FP-001, Specific Operations, Volume 3, Part 1, Desert Operations (not yet published).
t. B-GS-316-013/FP-001, Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence, Volume 13, Individual Procedures.
u. B-GS-316-014/FP-001, Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence, Volume 14, Formation and Unit
Procedures.
1B-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 1
w. B-CE-320-002/PT-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 2, Engineer and Assault Pioneer Field Pocket Book
(Interim 3).
x. B-CE-320-003/PT-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 3, Part 1, Engineer Command and Control (not yet
published).
ac. B-GL-320-009/FP-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 9, Demolitions, Part 1, All Arms.
ad. B-GL-320-009/FP-002, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 9, Demolitions, Part 2, Engineers and Assault
Pioneers.
ae. B-GL-320-010/FT-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 10, Mines and Booby Traps, Part 1, All Arms.
af. B-GL-320-010/FT-002, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 10, Mines and Booby Traps, Part 2, Engineers and
Assault Pioneers.
ag. B-CE-320-011/FP-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 11, Part 1, Equipment Bridging, Rafting and MGB
Operations (not yet published).
ah. B-CE-320-011/FP-002, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 11, Part 2, NSB Bridging (not yet published).
ai. B-GL-320-012/FP-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 12, Horizontal Construction, Part 1, Soils.
aj. B-GL-320-012/FP-002, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 12, Horizontal Construction, Part 2, Roads (not yet
published).
ak. B-GL-320-012/FP-003, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 12, Horizontal Construction, Part 3, Airfields (not
yet published).
al. B-GL-320-012/FP-004, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 12, Horizontal Construction, Part 4, Pits and
Quarries.
am. B-GL-320-013/FP-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 13, Accommodation, Installations and Engineering
Services for Deployed Operations.
an. B-GL-320-014/FP-001, Engineer Field Manual, Volume 14, Water Supply (not yet published).
ap. B-GA-400-000/FP-000, Out of the Sun - Aerospace Doctrine for the CF.
1B-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 1
3. NATO Publications:
b. AAP-18, Guide for the Restoration of Facilities on the Lines of Communications, Ports and Other Critical
Installations after Hostile Actions.
b. Joint Publication 3-07, Joint Doctrine for Operations Other Than War.
e. Joint Publication 4-04, Joint Doctrine for Civil Engineering Support, February 1992.
1B-3/1B-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 2
SECTION I
1. The TF Engr wears three similar, but distinctly separate, "hats." As the Senior Military Engr, he controls
and coordinates the employment of all operational level military engr units and reports directly to the TFC. As a
Principal Staff Officer he may report to either the Deputy TFC or the Chief of Staff (COS), and is responsible to the
TFC for planning, organizing, controlling and coordinating all engr support to the TF. He also acts as the Military
Engr Advisor to the TFC and provides advice on all aspects of military engr support.
1. The TF Engr Cell is assigned to the TFC's staff within the office of the TF Engr (See Figure 2-1). This cell
is separate from the J3 and coordinates military engr support in four (five) main areas: plans, operations, intelligence
and logistics (liaison if required). As part of the TFHQ, the TF Engr Cell formulates theatre military engr policy, and
also conducts engr planning, monitoring, engr resource (finance and material) coordination, and staff coordination
for engr operations.
TFHQ / TFC
NDHQ (1)
FORCE TF
GENERATORS (CCs) CDS ENGR
CELL
(1)
(2) SAMP
(2)
ESU UNIT
NDHQ/J3
(2)
CIS
NDHQ/J3ENGR (2) UNIT
CSG
OPERATIONAL
(2)
CMG
(1) FULL COMMAND
UNIT
(2) OPERATIONAL COMMAND
(3) OPERATIONAL CONTROL (2)
ADMINISTRATIVE
COORDINATION - LIAISON
TECHNICAL-PROFESSIONAL ADVICE LAND MARITIME AIR
FORCE FORCE FORCE
2-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. The organization of the TF Engr Cell will depend on the scope of engr requirements. The recommended
structure is as follows:
a. Command Section.
b. Engr Plans Section. The plans section drafts and issues the military engr policy for the TF in coordination
with higher HQ and the TFHQ staff. The section provides staff advice to other elements of the TFHQ, writes
the Military Engr Supporting Plan (SUP) and integrates it into the overall TF plan.
c. Engr Operations Section. The operations section monitors and controls and coordinates the execution
of military engr operations. All contacts with allied forces, HN and civilian agencies are coordinated with the
engr operations section.
d. Engr Intelligence Section. The intelligence section coordinates the collection and exchange of engr
information and intelligence with J2, component engrs, NDHQ and allies. It is also responsible for
coordination of geomatics support for the TF as directed by the TF Engr. (For this task, they may be
augmented by personnel from the ESU geomatics sub-unit.)
e. Engr Logistics Section. The engr logistics section coordinates logistics and administrative support for engr
operations with J4 and J1 staffs. A small element will provide policy direction and coordination for all
construction contracts, however the technical contracting expertise will be resident in the ESU. A small
element will also provide policy direction and coordination for real property management for the TFHQ, but
again, the technical expertise will be retained in the ESU.
f. Engr Liaison Section. A military engr liaison section will be established, as required, to coordinate with
allied engrs, HNS engrs, and component engrs. This section may be detached to TFHQ liaison staff under
control of the TFHQ COS.
g. TF Geo/Chief Geomatics Officer (CGO). Although the TF Geo/Chief Geomatics Officer would most
effectively serve the operational requirements of the TFHQ by being located with the operations staff as a
separate specialist, (dependent on the composition of the staff and the size of the HQ), it is also possible
that the position would be located with the TF Engr Cell. Location could also be dependent upon any
dominance of an environmental component of the TF and the TF SOPs. The TF Geo (CGO) is responsible
for coordinating the provision of all geomatics support and for providing professional geomatics advice to the
TFC and the TFHQ staff. The TF Geo will provide specialist advice concerning geomatics support, to include,
but not limited to, that required and available to support operations, training and planning. This would include
advice on the exploitation of integral or assigned geomatics resources.
2-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
1. Role. The role of the ESU is to provide close and general support to TF units, and general support to the
components. It will also provide specialized engr support to the TF.
2. Support to TF Formations and Units. The ESU will provide all military engr support to TF formations and
units by implementing the Military Engr Annex to the TF Op O. This will consist of two types of support:
a. Close Support. Close support to force level units includes the day to day support required to operate power
generation, water supply, heating and ventilating systems and to conduct routine maintenance on
infrastructure. This may be accomplished by centralizing all personnel in the ESU, by assigning
detachments to each unit as necessary or a combination of both. The CO of the ESU is the primary engr
advisor; and
b. General Support. General support includes other aspects of military engr support to force level units as
a whole, such as construction and maintenance of Main Supply Routes (MSRs), water supply, provision of
geomatics support, response to environmental incidents, etc.
3. General Support to Components. The ESU will provide general support to the components as required
to ensure mission accomplishment. ESU resources may also be used to augment component engrs for specific
tasks. Detailed division of responsibilities between the ESU and the component engrs are described in Chapter 6.
4. Specialist Engr Support. The ESU will provide specialist engr support for the TF. However, this capability
must be centralized within the ESU due to cost, complexity or control. Examples of this type of support are
specialized contract supervision in foreign countries, construction materials testing, temporary standard design
expertise, fire protection services and EOD beyond the capabilities of the components.
1. Organization. The ESU (Figure 2-2) is tailored to suit the mission and may deploy with only a HQ element,
as sub-units or as specialist teams in support of the components. The ESU sub-units will generally be organized
into a HQ organization with construction (vertical and horizontal) and utilities, engr resources, engr heavy equipment,
geomatics, fire prevention services, and service support elements. Other engr sub-units may be attached to the
ESU as required, including engrs from component engr organizations.
2-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
OPERATION
INTELLIGENCE
UAG
OPERATION
COMMUNICATION
ESU LIAISON
HQ
REQUIREMENTS
ENGINEERING DESIGN
CONTRACT
2. Specialist Engr Teams. The TF Engr may choose to establish specialist teams from ESU resources to
respond to specific requests for engr support during the warning, preparation, deployment, employment or
redeployment phases of an operation. They may also be useful for limited operations where the entire ESU is not
required. The composition of the teams and their missions may vary at the discretion of the TF Engr. Possible
specialist teams may include, but are not limited to the following:
b. Electrical Generation;
2-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
k. EOR/EOD.
1. Allied Engrs. In combined operations, allied engrs may be attached to the TF. Their activities will be
directed and coordinated by the TF Engr who will advise the TFC on their employment. C2 relationships will be
established in the OpO and any regrouping of allied engrs must be consistent with these arrangements. Special
attention should also be paid to ensuring proper communications with the allied unit, and that appropriate
administrative and logistics arrangements have been made.
2. Host Nation Support (HNS). HNS is defined as civil and/or military assistance rendered by a nation to
foreign forces within its territory during peace, times of crisis or armed conflict based upon agreements mutually
concluded between nations. (See also chapter 7). Some HNS is of particular importance to engrs:
a. Engr Intelligence. Host Nation Engr Forces may provide intelligence on local terrain, local resources,
specific infrastructure associated with transportation, energy (electrical and natural gas) and water supplies,
prepared obstacles and other aspects.
b. Damage Repair. Repair to vital infrastructure and the guarantee of freedom of operations may be a HNS
task. This may include LOC bridging operations, repair of ports and airfields.
c. Construction Materials. HNS agreements may also cover supply of bulky construction materials such as
gravel, concrete, lumber, etc.
d. Miscellaneous. HNS agreements can include the provision of general support services such as fire
protection, both structural and crash fire rescue.
3. Civilian Contract Support. Civilian contract support, other than under formal HNS agreements, will be
a major source of engr assistance. Civilian construction contract support procedures are outlined in chapter 7.
4. Uniformed Non-engr Labour. Within the TF there will be many skilled and unskilled uniformed personnel
that are available to assist in military engr tasks. This can range from infantry assistance in the laying of tactical
minefields to the use of a ship's company to assist in the repair of infrastructure. This source should be used when
practical but it must be directed by the TFC or appropriate component commander on advice of TF Engr or
component engr advisor. The work must be supervised and inspected by military engrs before it is considered
complete.
2-5/2-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION III
1. ESU Geomatics Support Capabilities. The ESU geomatics sub-unit has the responsibility to provide rapid
response operational support to meet the immediate requirements of TF units and special purpose production to
support TFHQ future operations planning and redeployments. The Geo Sp Sqn is structured with four task
organized sections in addition to five independent Geo Sp Tms (GSTs) and a small headquarters. Specific
capabilities are as follows:
a. Command and Control. A small C2 element will advise the TF Engr and the CO ESU on the priority of
geomatics work, standardize support and process requirements, carry out liaison with other allied geomatics
staffs for product exchange, and is able to attach a planning and coordination team to the TFHQ as directed
by the CO ESU.
b. Terrain Analysis (TERA) Terrain Visualization (TVis). The ESU capability is in addition to the integral
TERA detachment support provided to the 1 Int Coy ICAC. The geospatial information provided is primarily
for the J3 / J4 / TF Engr, other TFHQ staff and the components. Independent teams are available for grouping
with integral capabilities to produce a multiplicity of tactical decision aids (TDAs) using terrain data bases
and other data sources.
c. Map Distribution. The ESU will normally be tasked to establish a Map Supply Point tied into the higher
level formation or national network. Responsibilities include: shipping and receiving, inventory control and
sourcing of required geographic products both conventional (hard) and digital (soft). Tasks include bulk
stocks breakdown, but not delivery (outside the ESU) which remains a service support function.
d. Field Reproduction. The ESU provides for large format reproduction requirements and photographic
formats as required for the J3, TF Engr, other TFHQ staff, and the components.
e. Field (Geodetic) Survey. The ESU provides force level support to various weapon systems, gathers
elevation data, engr survey, obstacle locating, navigation, and geo-referencing at a variety of scales to
establish a ground truth network for imagery support.
f. Data Access and Management. The ESU provides field support to users of map background displays.
It is necessary to ensure that background display geographic information is fully available, up to date, and
operating throughout the TF to maximize efficiency of command and control systems. The ESU holds,
maintains and distributes available digital imagery for use on various computer systems in the TF.
2. Geomatics Support to the Components. Although the ESU may not be able to produce all products that
are required, requests for geographic support must be forwarded through the ESU Geo Sp Sqn. A decision will then
be made whether the items should be obtained in theatre (from the ESU, HNS or allied sources) or from Canadian
strategic sources. Support to specific service components will be as follows:
a. Land and Air Components. Land and air component engrs will coordinate geomatics support, including
terrain visualization, for their components and provide advice to the component commanders on geomatics
support matters as required. The ESU will provide support as required, with maps, aeronautical charts and
FLIPs being sourced form appropriate national sources.
b. Maritime Component. The maritime component staff will not deploy with require any geo trained Military
Engrs on staff, as individual ships and task groups deploy with a full complement of standard geospatial
information and required companion products. In the event that geomatics support is required, in excess
of that available through Sea LOC, the maritime component will address their requirement to the TF Engr who
may attach a Geo Sp Tm (GST) for the duration of an operational requirement.
2-7/2-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 3
SECTION I
300. GENERAL
1. This chapter assumes a mission with a large engr effort and the requirement for a TF Engr. The primary
discussion revolves around the organization of the TF Engr Cell and its interaction with components, other TFHQ
staff elements and TF engr assets (primarily the ESU).
1. At the strategic level, the NDHQ/J3 Engr, on behalf of the CDS, is responsible for planning and coordinating
engr support to CF operations. NDHQ/J3 Engr is a member of the NDHQ Joint Staff Steering Committee.
1. General. At the operational level, C2 of Military Engrs consists of the following functions:
a. Command of Operational Level Engr Resources. The TF Engr controls and coordinates the employment
of all operational level military engr resources. Operational level engr resources are those that have been
centralized at the TF level. They may consist of the ESU, elements of component engrs that are being
centrally controlled and allied or HN engrs attached to the TF. Consistent with the delegated command
authority, the TF Engr, through the TFC, can alter C2 relationships as required to fulfil the mission;
b. Staff Assistance to the TFHQ. The TF Engr Cell, as directed by the TF Engr, coordinates all military engr
staff input to the TFHQ;
c. Advice to the TFC. The TF Engr, is responsible to advise the TFC on all aspects of military engr support.
2. Location of TF Engr and his Staff. When the TF and TFHQ are being established, the TF Engr must
decide how the three functions will be executed. In a limited operation, one individual may do all three functions.
In a complex operation, the TF Engr will allocate the staff resources between the TF Engr Cell and the ESU HQ. This
will be based upon the mission, size of the force, size and capability of the ESU HQ, geographic separation between
the TFHQ and components, amount of engr work required and other factors. The TF Engr may also shift his
resources depending on the phase of the operation or the C2 method employed by the TFC (see chapter 1).
3. TF Engr Cell and ESU Responsibilities. The TF Engr must set priorities, plan, schedule, direct, coordinate
and control engr effort according to the TFC's plan. This is conducted using the complementary resources of the
TF Engr Cell and the ESU, as follows:
a. TF Engr Cell. The TF Engr Cell plans, schedules, monitors, reports and coordinates all aspects of military
engr support to the TF. The TF Engr Cell has the responsibility to coordinate engr matters within the TFHQ
and serve as the primary staff for engr related matters for the TFC;
b. The ESU. The primary responsibility of the ESU is to execute the operational level military engr support plan
as directed by the TFC. However, the ESU HQ also provides valuable technical staff assistance that can
assist the TF Engr in the planning and execution of military engr operations.
3-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. Engrs of the components of the TF are under command authority of the component commanders, unless
the TFC, on the advice of the TF Engr, elects to centralize certain component resources with the ESU. The
component commander would expect to retain his usual engr commander, or his representative, even when engrs
are regrouped. The decision to centralize resources will be determined by the most effective method to accomplish
the operational objectives. Although decentralization will be the norm, for the deployment and redeployment phases,
there may be a requirement for centralization to make the most effective use of scarce resources.
1. General. Technical Control is defined as: the control applied largely to administrative or technical
procedures and exercised by virtue of professional or technical jurisdiction. It parallels command channels but is
restricted to control within certain specialized areas. Operational commanders may override this type of control
anytime its application is seen to jeopardize the mission.
2. Technical Control of Engrs in a TF. In CF operations, the NDHQ/J3 Engr retains Technical Control over
the TF Engr and similarly the TF Engr has Technical Control over the component engrs. This means that general
technical guidance may be issued to subordinate engrs in the interest of commonality, standardization and
efficiency, as long as it does not conflict with the accomplishment of the mission. Technical control may relate to
such matters as report and return formats, construction procedures, safety, equipment use and other areas as
required. In a CF operation, supporting command engrs do not have technical control over component engrs. They
are responsible soley for providing suitably trained and equipped engr forces to the TFC and for sustaining those
forces. Sustainment includes the maintenance of operational and technical readiness through the provision of
personnel and materiel, preparatory training in Canada, environmental engr intelligence, and advice on technical
matters when requested by the TF Engr. All communications between the component engrs and the supporting
commands should be conducted through the TF Engr.
3. Engr Functional Co-ordination. In addition to their responsibilities to their respective commanders, every
engr commander is linked through an engr functional chain. This is not a chain of command, but it is at least a
channel of engr coordination and passage of information. It allows the TF Engr to monitor engr work and provide
accurate advice to the TFC based upon current and accurate information. Therefore it is essential that engr units
in the components of the TF be able to communicate with the TF Engr.
1. The work flow between NDHQ, TFHQ, coalition HQ, and the component level units assigned to the TF is
depicted in the flow diagram Figure 3-1:
a. Higher Headquarters (1): NDHQ and/or the coalition higher headquarters will provide funding, establish
policy guidelines, and outline appropriate project funding approval authorities.
b. The TFC (2): The TFC is the approval authority for all military engr operations and provides guidance based
on his operational intent. This is done through approval of the Military Engr SUP.
c. The J3 (3): The J3 is the tasking authority for the TF. The TF Engr Cell will staff engr related taskings
through the J3 to components, and others.
d. Coordination in the TFHQ (3): The TF Engr as a Principal Staff Officer, and assisted by the TF Engr Cell,
coordinates all aspects of military engr support to the TF with the TFHQ staff. This is conducted primarily
through staffing and subsequent implementation of either the approved Military Engr SUP or engr operations
order. It also includes coordination with J1 on military engr personnel matters; J2 on military engr
intelligence and geomatics support; J3 on conduct of operations; J4 on procurement, contracting and
3-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
construction support; and coordination with J5 for all military engr tasks (especially construction) that may
have public affairs or CIMIC implications.
e. Components and Others (4): Components, and others such as force level units, submit requests to TF
Engr Cell (either directly or through the J3) for projects beyond internal capability for accomplishment. The
projects are staffed to J3 for approval and prioritization.
f. The ESU and others (5): The ESU, other assigned units and contractors will execute design and
construction projects as assigned by the TF Engr Cell.
(1) NDHQ
COALITION
HQ
(2) TFC
(3) JTFHQ/J3
JTFHQ STAFF
TF ENGR
CELL
TF ENGR
(4) OTHERS
COMPONENTS
ESU CIVILIAN
SUB-UNITS CONTRACT COORDINATION
ASSETS
PROJECT REQUESTS
TASKINGS
3-3/3-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
1. The TF Engr Cell will determine the scope of military engr support and ensure that its execution is integrated
into TF operations as follows:
a. Military Engr End-State. The NDHQ/J3 Engr will have derived the military engr objectives and the military
engr end-state from the overall strategic objective and the mission end-state;
b. Estimate of Military Engr Support Requirements. The TF Engr Cell will then prepare an estimate to
determine the method of achieving the military engr end state and the scope of engr operations for the TF.
This will include initial and continual monitoring of engr general support requirements, assessment of host
nation, national contingent, civilian and military construction capabilities and resources, and funding status;
and
c. Integration of Military Engineering Execution into TF Operations. The TF Engr Cell will then prepare
the Military Engr SUP based upon the estimate. The TF Engr Cell will staff either the SUP, engr annex or
the engr operations order within the TFHQ, incorporate changes as required, and submit to the TFC for
approval. Once approved, it will be released by the TFC and be coordinated by the TF Engr.
1. The TF Engr Cell will monitor and coordinate the implementation of the Military Engr SUP / Op O as follows:
a. Implementation. The approved SUP / annex / order will be forwarded to the appropriate execution agents
(i.e., the ESU, components, HN Engrs and other augmentation forces) as required;
b. Recommendation of Priorities. The TF Engr Cell will review and consolidate all new project submissions
and compare it to the TFC's COO for validity, recommend changes and identify the level and source of
resources available for execution. This will include coordination and prioritization of all aspects of military
engr support including geomatics support to the TF. The TFC may convene a prioritization board to
accomplish this task;
c. Monitoring Execution. The TF Engr Cell will monitor the execution of the support by tracking the progress
of execution against schedule and cost targets, monitoring the location and movement of engr units and
materials, and maintaining liaison with other TFHQ staff elements to review changes in TF missions and
priorities which may impact the engr operations;
d. Identification and Resolution of Facility and Resource Shortfalls. The TF Engr Cell will verify shortfalls
identified by the ESU, components or others resulting from changes in TF courses of action, and assess
their impact on operations. Changes to the SUP / annex / order, redirection or reallocation of engr resources,
or requests for additional assets will be staffed through the J3 for approval by the TFC; and
e. Reporting Status. The TF Engr Cell will request execution status data from the ESU and component engrs
as required. The cell will consolidate and analyze data, and format and distribute the engr status report
within the TFHQ and to higher headquarters (NDHQ/J3 Engr and coalition engr staff) as required.
3-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. The TF Engr Cell will coordinate the collection and dissemination of operational level military engr information
and intelligence. The cell will also coordinate the exchange of military engr intelligence with the J2, component
engrs, NDHQ, coalition HQ engrs, and allies.
1. The TF Engr Cell will conduct national level liaison with other allied engrs in the combined-joint force through
the TF liaison staff. The cell will also conduct detailed coordination with the Host Nation on the implementation of
the engr portion of any HNS agreements. The TFC may delegate authority for direct liaison between components,
allied engrs, HNS and other representatives, if the situation requires.
1. TF Engr Cell staff is the coordinator for all aspects of force level administration and logistics support for
military engr operations. The TF Engr Cell will:
b. coordinate with J4 staff for the procurement and supply of engr construction and field fortification material;
c. coordinate with J4 staff for logistics support of engr augmentation forces assigned to the TF;
d. provide cost estimates for TF military engr operations based on detailed input from the ESU and by
consolidating requirements with type of funds, funding source, and methods of accomplishment;
e. obtain funds from all possible sources for engr tasks. Monitor funds available by type, source, function,
method of construction and maintain estimated "days of work" remaining with funds available. Continually
keep all interested parties, both laterally and vertically, informed of funding status;
f. monitor and coordinate financial management for the construction programme. This will include coordination
of funding with the J4 Fin who will be controlling construction related funding for the theatre; and
g. coordinate the engr portion of HNS agreements, and civilian contracting procedures with J4 and J5 staff.
1. The TF Engr Cell will provide staff advice to the TF Engr and the TFHQ staff on all military engr matters. This
will include:
a. maintenance of mobility;
b. counter-mobility;
c. enhancement of survivability;
3-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
e. geomatics support;
j. airfield services;
k. EOD/BMD;
l. NBCD;
m. military engr support to CIMIC and humanitarian assistance projects. Due to the nature of many
contemporary operations and the possible political and cultural ramifications of construction work, it is
important that construction projects be coordinated with the J5 at all levels. This will include all projects,
even those designed to support only TF assigned units; and
n. Real Property Management. Advice on military engr related real property management may include such
matters such as:
(3) provision of staff supervision over engr related real property operations;
3-7/3-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION III
313. INTRODUCTION
1. The CO of the ESU implements the operational level engr support plan as directed by the TFC. He also is
the primary engr advisor to the TF level units while executing close support tasks. The Operations and Engr Cells
within the ESU HQ also provide a number of technical functions that assist the TF Engr and his staff in the planning
and conduct of operations.
1. The ESU HQ Engineering Cell will be responsible to coordinate to provision of the following expertise:
a. specialist design, studies, material testing, quality control, and survey expertise for temporary design
standard;
c. design, quality control and supervision of work on bituminous and concrete pavements in the area of
operations;
d. provision of operational level technical recce support including Sea Port of Disembarkation (SPOD)/ Air POD
(APOD), LOC and theatre staging bases;
e. detailed assessment and supervision of environmental cleanup beyond the responsibility of component engrs;
f. damage assessment beyond the responsibility of component engrs, and repair to temporary standard or
above. This will include facilities and structures damaged as a result of war, man-made or natural disaster;
g. specialized advice on non-electronic Camouflage, Concealment and Deception (CCD) measures for fixed
installations; and
h. specialist security engineering design expertise for the construction of non-expedient structures to improve
physical security throughout the theatre. Security Engineering involves the design and construction of
facilities and structures to protect forces from a wide variety of threats including terrorists, theft, irregular
forces and regular forces.
a. provision of financial management for the TF Engr construction programme including: detailed planning,
submission, and programming of funding required for construction;
b. preparation of detailed cost estimates for TF military engr operations for submission to the TF Engr Cell;
c. implementing the engr portion of the HNS agreement and contracting of HNS where more than one
component is involved;
d. drafting and coordinating contracts where more than one component is involved, or as directed by the TF
Engr;
3-9
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
e. specialized contracting services outside Canada. This may include contract administration, quality control
and inspection where speed of response, language, unique customs or procedures require special expertise;
and
f. construction management for major projects and those involving more than one component.
a. detailed coordination with the CSG for the procurement, quality control, delivery and supply of specialist engr
stores and materiel in theatre;
b. holding and controlling specialized engr equipment, stores and tools that have been centralized by the TF
Engr due to cost, expertise or efficiency; and
1. Although the TF Engr Cell, in coordination with other elements of the TFHQ, will formulate the policy and
guidance for real property management, the ESU will provide the following support:
2. Real Property Management Guidelines are contained in Annex A to this chapter. They are provided as a
reference in accordance with CFP 120 - Construction Engineering Manual.
3-10
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION IV
1. General. The TF Engr is responsible for collecting and consolidating all engr reports and returns in-theatre
and ensuring that the TFC, NDHQ/J3 Engr, and coalition engr staff if applicable are kept informed.
2. Reporting Engr Information. Military engrs in the TF must have the capability to pass information from
sub-unit level up to, and including, the engr staff in NDHQ/J3 Engr. Component Engrs must report engr specific
information to the TF Engr to ensure that engr advice can be provided to the TFC. This must then be consolidated
and reported to the NDHQ/J3 Engr to ensure accurate input to the strategic decision making process. Information
may be passed through the use of engr reports contained in STANAG 2430 and TFHQ SOPs, electronic means,
voice or by personal contact.
1. In combined operations, it is essential that there be interoperable communications between engr units. Due
to the variance in national telecommunications equipment, it may be necessary to establish communications
between units or formations by exchanging telecommunications equipment; and/or using liaison detachments.
1. If required, liaison officers will be detached from the TFHQ to adjacent and other headquarters. Liaison staff
may also be attached to the TFHQ from other commands. Liaison officers must know the capabilities and
limitations of their own environments and units.
2. Military engr personnel may be assigned to the TFC's liaison staff to assist in the coordination of engr
support activities. Liaison officers may work under the direction of the TFHQ COS and perform the following
functions:
a. the acquisition of information for the TFC, the TF Engr and the joint staff, at another headquarters;
b. the passage of information from the TFC and TF Engr to allied engrs; and
3. The use of liaison staff will be the exception rather than the rule, however liaison officers play a much more
significant and important role in combined operations.
1. Liaison requirements should be included in all orders. There are three requirements of importance to engrs:
a. reciprocal liaison is required when an engr unit is placed under operational command or operational control
of a headquarters of a different nationality;
b. liaison with the Host Nation authority at the appropriate level, as directed by the TFC, is essential; and
c. specific liaison must be established between adjacent formations/units to ensure the detailed co-ordination
of all aspects of the conduct of engr operations across formation boundaries.
3-11/3-12
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 3
2. To provide guidance for the TF Engr and ESU staffs in property management during deployed operations it
must be understood that the property management and leasing of infrastructure/accommodation or services is
subject to the laws, forms and protocols of the HN in which the mission is deployed. In UN/NATO/coalition led
missions, the mission proforma/rules will normally be followed. If none are available, the guidelines below are
provided to assist in reaching the best possible deal for the CF. The drafting of a lease or contractual agreement
should be done in concert with the TFHQ staffs as previously mentioned.
2. Lease Format/Documentation. It is recommended that the standard lease agreement used by the
authorities of the country involved be used as the basis for the agreement. The formats and content of these
agreements are fairly standard throughout the world. However, the legal and financial staffs will have to review them
first. The legal staff can provide the legal wording required and the financial/logistic staffs can indicate what
authorized levels are required for a given value of contract and how the payment/financial wording should be phrased.
From an engineering perspective the following criteria should be considered:
b. Condition Agreement. An agreement in the lease concerning the environmental and physical condition
of the property is required. The agreement should stipulate who is responsible for any environmental or
physical damage that occurred prior to CF occupancy and whether the damage will be fixed prior to, during
or after CF usage.
d. Compensation for Improvements. The lease should include provisions for negotiated compensation to
Canada for any improvements to the property (upgrading water, electrical, sewer systems, etc) that Canada
does during its occupancy. If a compensation process and value is not in the lease, there should be
recognition of, and agreement that this matter could be negotiated. As with the damage agreement,
reporting, documenting, assessing and negotiating criteria should be part of the claims settlement clauses.
3A-1/3A-2
B-G-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 3
1. General. All CF establishments, whether at home or deployed abroad should have a facilities
development planning and control system for construction and maintenance activities. Missions under UN or
other non Canadian funding will use the UN or force planning and control system if provided. For missions
utilizing CF funding for all or part of their infrastructure construction and maintenance activities should develop
a facilities development planning and control system based on the following guidelines.
a. infrastructure will meet minimum military requirements (i.e. the most austere facility required to
meet a CF role) and will be procured and maintained at the most economical level to fulfil the CF
operations;
b. accommodation scales provide a guide which outlines the normal limits for expenditure of public
and non-public funds;
c. notwithstanding the existence of a scale, each case may be considered on its own merits, with
decisions based on the justification provided;
4. CF Operations Facilities Control Policy. A deployed contingent should ensure that an appropriate
control system is in place to provide project funding and approval control over normal facilities maintenance
and construction activities stemming from the FDP system.
5. RESPONSIBILITIES
a. NDHQ. COS J3 through J3 Engr is responsible for ensuring contingents have a facilities
development planning and control system within the guidelines.
c. Senior CME Representative. The Senior Contingent CME Representative is responsible for the
following:
(1) assisting the contingent operations, logistics and comptroller staff in the development of the
contingent infrastructure development planning and control system;
(2) managing the system during the deployment on behalf of the Commander; and
3B-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 3
d. Contingent Operations/G3 Staff. The Contingent Operations/G3 staff are responsible for
providing clear and timely direction on the operational matters that may affect current or future
infrastructure requirements to support the contingent mission;
e. Contingent Logistics/G4 Staff. The Contingent Logistics/G4 staff are responsible to ensure that
all supply demands/procurements which require installation into fixed infrastructure or draw from
contingent utility services have been reviewed and agreed to under the contingent facilities
development planning and control system; and
f. Contingent Comptroller. The Contingent Comptroller is responsible for monitoring the system to
ensure compliance with DND/CF expenditure regulations.
6. GUIDELINES
a. General. The guidelines are provided to assist the Contingent Commander in developing a
practical infrastructure development planning and control system for the specific mission. The
following caveats are included:
(1) as each operation and mission area will be different, a comprehensive set of rules is not
practical and will normally not be issued by NDHQ;
(2) if the UN or coalition has issued guidance, the more stringent system will be followed;
(3) the guidelines include only those items that are deemed essential for sound development and
control of deployed camp infrastructure;
(4) the Commander may impose more detailed and/or stringent rules but cannot issue less
restrictive guidelines without prior authority from NDHQ; and
(5) operational necessity and safety considerations will prevail over the policy.
7. Facilities Development Planning. The Facilities Planning System identifies long-range development
objectives and establishes general programming initiatives from which projects can be prepared and
accommodation decisions taken. This planning ensures that contingent and, in some cases, force level
construction and maintenance programmes are coordinated. The Facilities Planning System deals with that
which is known and is not intended to cover all eventualities. The Facilities Development Book is the basic
reference for facilities planning and it comprises an approved Master FDP and all its FDP support data and
implementation documents.
a. Terms of Reference
(1) Accommodation. The Committee is responsible for the initial allocation and subsequent
redistribution of space affecting all sub-units, for recommending changes of use to facilities
requiring NDHQ concurrence; for maintaining the currency of facility Development
Categories, and for programming temporary accommodation plans in support of construction
and renovation projects and changes to leased accommodation. It remains a Contingent
Engineer responsibility to maintain Facilities Use Tables. It is recommended that the
Committee mandate include NPF and NPF/Public accommodation.
3B - 2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 3
(2) Minor New Construction. The Committee is responsible for assessing all minor new
construction requests for work exceeding local/Engineer authority but which is within the
Commanders authority. Recommendations to the Commander involving both Public and
NPF/Public-funded work, should include the following:
(a) recommended and prioritized approval for inclusion in the current rotation's programme
or in a follow-on contingent's programme; and
3B-3/3B-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 4
SECTION I
a. initiation;
b. orientation;
d. decision;
f. plan review.
2. These steps are described in detail in B-GG-005-004/AF-004 Force Employment, and trigger planning at
the operational level when a wngO is issued by the CDS in the strategic PLAN DEVELOPMENT step. The military
engr operations planning must complement and reinforce that of the TFC and his staff. The key to effective military
engr planning at the operational level is the early designation of the TF Engr, and a smooth transition from the
strategic level (NDHQ/J3 Engr), to the operational level (TF Engr), with a constant flow of information between the
two.
1. At the operational level, the same six planning steps are employed. This article describes the Military Engr
actions at each step of the process.
2. Initiation. The initiation step commences with a CDS wngO. During this step, the task is assigned or
assumed, major combat and logistic resources and strategic transportation assets are identified for planning
purposes, the intelligence process is initiated, and the ground work is laid for planning to begin. Military Engr
actions include:
d. input from the strategic geographic assessment will be reviewed and passed to the TF Engr; and
3. Orientation. Orientation involves the analysis and definition of the mission, the preparation and issue of
the TFC's planning guidance and a description of the end states of the operation. During this step, the TF Engr will:
a. derive the military engr end state from the overall objectives of the TFC. The military engr end state must
4-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
b. provide the appropriate input to the commander's planning guidance to ensure that all staff cells of the TFHQ
consider the military engr aspects of planning;
c. as part of the mission analysis, functionally group all the information available, both fact and assumption,
into: assigned tasks, implied tasks, constraints and restraints, and TFC's intentions; and
4. Concept Development. In the concept development step, staff estimates are conducted, an information
brief is prepared for the TFC, and the TFC's estimate is produced. The information brief includes tentative courses
of action, and the commander's estimate describes the courses of action which best achieve the mission. During
this stage, the TF Engr will:
a. prepare an operational level military engr estimate according to the format at Annex A.;
b. as part of the estimate process, develop options for achieving both specified and implied tasks. These
options should identify the essential missions to be executed, the engr effort required, the construction
materials needed, the proposed construction standard, the estimated time required to execute the option,
and any special considerations such as environmental or CIMIC implications;
c. ensure that military engr aspects (environmental considerations and force projection and sustainment tasks)
are considered in the operations, logistics, CIMIC and other staff estimates at this stage of the planning
process; and
d. provide input into the drafting of the geomatics concept of operational support.
5. Decision. The decision step involves a decision briefing, selection of a course of action, development of
a COO and approval of the concept by the TFC and, subsequently by the CDS. The COO outlines the TFC's intent
in the deployment, employment, support and sustainment of the TF. The COO is approved by the strategic level
commander (i.e., the CDS) and issued to commanders of the subordinate components of the TF. During this stage,
the TF Engr will:
a. coordinate strategic and operational level military engr planning with NDHQ/J3 Engr;
b. ensure that appropriate military engr input is provided in the COO to allow component engrs to commence
their planning process;
6. Plan Development. Plan development consists of developing, approving and issuing the main plan and
SUPs. These plans will describe operations and activities for each phase. They will also define objectives, identify
forces needed to accomplish the mission in accordance with the commander's COO, identify administrative and
logistic support arrangements, identify operational transportation requirements and identify any shortfalls. On behalf
of the TFC, the TF Engr completes the military engr support concept and develops the Military Engr SUP:
a. TFC Policy Guidance. Besides engr information and intelligence, additional guidance is required to
develop an accurate and effective Military Engr SUP or Military Engr Annex to the operation plan (See
Annex C for a format for the Military Engr SUP). This guidance is based upon higher headquarters direction
and formulated by the TF Engr and the TFHQ staff and approved by the TFC. Policy guidance requirements
include but are not limited to the following:
4-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
(1) the TFC's direction on accommodation standards, especially in austere theatres of operations;
(3) water supply and storage, fuel storage, electricity, and waste disposal policies;
(5) the impact of operations on the environment and the TFC's environmental policy;
(6) geomatics support policy including standard map scales, use of satellite images, GPS, etc; and
(7) engr support policy for humanitarian assistance and military civic action as part of CIMIC operations.
b. Military Engineering SUP. As part of the plan development step the TF Engr must decide if a Military
Engr SUP will be issued, an annex to the main plan or both. The important difference between a SUP and
an annex, is that while an annex may be included with the plan, a SUP is always a standalone document
subject to its own review and approval procedure. It is used when the volume of direction or data to be
covered makes the use of an annex impractical. The Military Engr SUP must contain sufficient information
on the plan it supports to satisfy users who have not received the plan.
c. Military Engineer Annex. Annexes are integral parts of the plan; approval of the plan constitutes approval
of the annex(es). Where an annex is published separately, the annex will be covered by a letter of
promulgation signed by the J3 Plans and Operations. A summary of the important elements of the annex
should be included in the plan, and the annex must use at least paragraphs one (Situation) and two
(Mission) of the standard format.
d. Geomatics Support Annex. In planning for geomatics support, the following general conditions should
be considered:
(1) geomatics support is a national responsibility. Normally forces deploy with their geomatics support
operational stocks of maps and charts and any supporting environmental components (such as terrain
analysis teams, etc). Other nations very seldom provide geomatics services, outside perhaps limited
distribution of replenishment stocks after the first 60 to 90 days of operations;
(2) products are “designated” for use. Products are “authorized”, to avoid a proliferation of maps and
charts covering the same area, but having conflicting grids, datum, edition numbers, etc;
(3) maps and charts provided by an allied or host nation may come with conditions imposed, conditions
which may not allow the CF to further distribute them to third parties;
(4) it takes time to secure release authority (for controlled stocks). Notwithstanding exchange
agreements, it may take some time for J2 Geo to secure the release of products from allies.
Furthermore, some products may be in short supply and distribution may be further limited by NDHQ,
or another headquarters, due to priority of requirement;
(5) there may be requirements to account for consumption of products provided by allies or host nations,
since DND may eventually be liable for costs associated with use; and
(6) global coverage is not yet available and production resources are not infinite. It is essential to
cooperate with allies and to plan ahead. In some cases alternate rapid response substitute products
may have to be generated.
e. Environmental Protection Annex. The TF Engr will also ensure that the TFC's environmental direction
is included in an environmental protection annex as part of the plan (See Section III and Annex E for
4-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
details).
7. Plan Review. Plan review is the final step in the operational level planning process. This step involves an
analysis of the final plans and a process of regular review and revision to ensure that the plans remain valid.
Elements of the plan for the employment of military engrs will interact with many other aspects of the operational
plan. For example, there will be interaction between the military engr plan and the logistics plan and between plans
for LOC maintenance and movement. The TF Engr must ensure that all such aspects are continually coordinated
with other TFHQ staff, throughout the planning process and the implementation of the plan.
1. The strategic PLAN DEVELOPMENT step is concluded when the CDS has been briefed by the TFC and
he is satisfied that he can report to the government that the detailed operational plan is ready for implementation.
2. The start of the strategic PLAN REVIEW step signals the issue of an Implementation Order (ImplO).
This involves the translation of the plans into orders. The strategic PLAN REVIEW step covers the period of time
and activities related to the final preparation of the TF, their deployment, employment, sustainment and
redeployment. The involvement of military engrs in the implementation of CF operations is found in chapter 5.
404. CO-ORDINATION
1. Tailoring the Force. The engr grouping is tailored to execute the identified missions. Planners must
consider all available engr capabilities. The force will consist of a mix of component engrs, the ESU, allied engrs,
HNS forces and civilian contractor labour. The TFC, on the advice of the TF Engr may regroup engrs from the
components if necessary.
2. Coalition Operations. When operating in a coalition, military engr planners must understand the
capabilities of member states' engr organizations. For example, many member states separate combat and
construction engr skills, others do not. This understanding will help the planner combine the appropriate types of
engr units required and eliminate unnecessary redundancy when planning multinational operations. Interoperability
must be considered to ensure that assets are complementary, if not compatible. Engr planners also consider
assets available through contracts, the HN, and private agencies.
1. Component Engineer Planning. Component engrs should begin planning when a TF warning order is
issued. Tactical level military engr planning will be concurrent with and consistent with operational level engr
planning conducted by the TF Engr. Once the military engr support concept is defined and the operational level
Military Engr SUP is developed, it is issued with the TF operation order (as a SUP or annex). Component engrs
begin detailed engr support planning for their forces based upon the direction of their component commanders and
the operational engr support plan. Again, the key to success in tactical level planning is the early designation of
the component engr and a smooth transition from the operational level (TF Engr) with a constant flow of information
between the two.
4-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
406. GENERAL
1. More often, operations, as defined across the entire spectrum of conflict, are focussing towards the range
of Operations Other Than War (OOTW), which has caused engrs to support and sustain forces for long periods of
time away from areas with established infrastructure. This has placed an emphasis on a more generalised engr
support structure for logistic and other installations, placing a greater weight on construction and other artisan skills.
2. The other facit of OOTW operations which engrs can effectively support is the scope of “unopposed” force
projection operations of a sensitive or complex nature such as humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, peace
support operations or even counter drug/terrorist operations. More information concerning these type of situations
are contained in the B-GG-005-004/AF-000 series of doctrinal manuals.
3. All operations will require a degree of force projection. Ground formations must be deployed strategically
into a theatre and then become established before they can start in-theatre operations. Engr support is a vital
enabling factor in theatre entry, establishment of national and combined forces and their sustainment. The
composition and level of engr support needed will be dictated by a range of factors including the threat, overall force
levels, climate, terrain, local infrastructure, HNS, civilian contractors, and time.
4. Each operation will tend, through different combinations of these factors, to be unique. It cannot be
assumed that component engrs will be available to conduct entry or sustainment tasks. In most cases, they would
be required to stay with their component for joint preparation, acclimatization and in-theatre training. Hence, a need
for sustainment engrs for surge and sustainment tasks. Therefore, the NDHQ/J3 Engr will be responsible, as part
of strategic engr planning, to identify three separate functional engr groups as part of engr support to force projection:
b. those engrs responsible for entry and redeployment tasks (general support); and
c. those engrs responsible for sustaining the TF as a whole (general support or a combination of both).
1. The nature of the threat, the surrounding circumstances of the situation and the availability of operational
(1:250,000) and tactical (1:50,000) level mapping will dictate the type and quantity of engr effort required. They will
also affect strategic deployment routes, air and sea points of entry (A&SPOE), restoration of entry facilities,
emergency provision of power, water and bulk fuel, the level of host nation cooperation and ability to provide in-
theatre resources, the physical state of the theatre infrastructure and the ability to use civilian manpower.
2. Selection of these various services will be influenced by the operational plan. Provision and maintenance
of any of these facilities or services can be effected by the degree of enemy influence. Areas of operations that have
sophisticated infrastructure still operational will require relatively little engr support.
1. As with the planning and preparation of any TF mobilizing to deploy, force projection and sustainment
operations also require planning with a logical sequence of engr activities considered. As stated, the nature of the
threat or enemy disposition will dictate the degree to which forcible entry operations are planned. Hence, the
quantity of engr effort required to support such entry operations could be extensive. NDHQ/J3 Engr would coordinate
this requirement as part of the strategic planning.
409. ENTRY OPERATIONS
4-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. Entry into a theatre of operations requires the selection of POE which will be dictated by the operational
plan. Establishment and sustainment of these POE could demand some or all of the following engr support:
a. Ports. Clearance of underwater obstacles, construction or repair of jetties, sea container handling, provision
of ports services and helicopter landing pads;
b. Airfields. Airfield damage repair, hardening command facilities, security engineering, construction of blast
protection for aircraft, expedient surface construction, temporary accommodations, provision of utilities,
provision of fire services in support of flight operations;
c. Medical/Logistical Installations. Facilities and utilities restoration, collective NBC protection, temporary
accommodations;
d. Construction and Maintenance of Theatre LOC Routes. A road network will be required linking
geographically separated components and units. If it is not feasible to use existing networks or if the
network is insufficient for the needs of the TF, initial construction or road improvement maybe necessary.
Other factors such as the effects of weather, usage rates and military load classifications could be
restrictive considerations.
e. Fire Protection Services. Fire protection services are needed for both structural and crash fire rescue
operations. Hazardous material handling as well as fire prevention are considerations that must be
addressed.
1. It is during combat operations that the military objectives and end states will be sought. The military engr
support afforded to any or all of the land, sea or air engagements will most likely cover the entire spectrum of
maintaining mobility, counter-mobility, enhancing survivability, sustainment engineering and geomatics tasks.
2. Combat operations will be offensive, defensive and focused on the expansion of the Area of Operations (AO)
and the destruction of the enemy. Hence the fluidity of those type of operations will be constantly back and forth
and always require engr support. From the most forward of operating bases to the expansion of the bridgehead and
the constant provision and updating of military geographic information (geomatics), the sustainment engineering
tasks are endless. Other less obvious engr sustainment tasks may include construction and maintenance of
refugee facilities, support to camouflage and deception operations or augmenting other theatre or allied forces force
protection and survivability.
1. Engr resources, stores or materiel whether brought from Canada or purchased in theatre, will be controlled
by an engr resources organization. This will be ideally located as part of an ESU. The ESU will track movement,
provide some manufacturing capabilities and ensure that pre-checked sets or individual items are provided for each
task executed by TF level engr units regardless of the functional grouping as related to force projection and
sustainment.
2. Engr equipment and stores will be clearly marked and recorded on the TFMT and cross checked with
waybills of the aircraft or ship that is transporting the resources into the A&SPOE.
1. There may be a large requirement for engr support to in-theatre training which is required to acclimatize the
4-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
TF in order for them to reach operational efficiency. For example, the marking of field firing and air-ground target
ranges, targetry manufacture or obstacle/minefield construction for the conduct of breaching operations. Such engr
support should be provided by general support or sustainment engrs. The ESU will be responsible to coordinate all
types of engr support to TF unit level training, as component engrs will be most likely conducting similar concurrent
training with their affiliated close support formation.
2. Depending on the size of the TF and the duration of sustained operations, consideration would have to be
given to the sustainment capabilities of the engr force itself. There may be a requirement to reinforce the engr units
with reserves or even rotate out of theatre complete units for replacements. This factor is a critical point of engr
planning that should be considered in the planning of the operation at the strategic as well as operational levels.
Due to the nature of any type of engr support given to an operation, the two engr factors that could limit any
operation is the engr equipment and the engr soldier.
1. With the cessation of hostilities or the end of combat operations, force transition to redeployment priorities
may occur in one area while residual actions are still taking place in another sector of the AO or force projection
theatre. Engr support may be extensive to the restoration of order, reestablishment of infrastructure or preparation
for redeployment. Engr activities could have a direct impact on the “flow” of forces through designated staging areas
or routes. Engr tasks are focussed on repair of damaged infrastructure, maintenance of A & SPOD, battlefield and
hazardous waste clean-up, environmental clean-up and certification, return of infrastructure to HN authorities and
other general sustainment engr tasks.
2. A coordinated effort between logistical, medical, communications and security units of the TF, as well as
HQ staffs, is required to successfully accomplish mission tasks prior to complete redeployment. The TF Engr and
the TF Engr Cell will coordinate with the component engr units and the ESU to ensure all engr tasks are completed
to achieve the engr mission end state as well as the TFC’s end state.
4-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION III
1. Canadian Defence Policy Directive P 5/92, states that all CF operations will be planned and conducted with
appropriate consideration for their effect on the environment. It is DND/CF policy to meet the environmental
protection responsibilities and the pollution control standards and objectives in applicable federal and provincial
statutes and regulations, subject to operational requirements as approved by the NDHQ/J3.
2. Early planning is essential to ensure all appropriat e environmental considerations are adequately addressed
and that the appropriate environmental assessments or reviews have been completed according to the A-EN-007-
000/FP-001 - Environmental Assessment Manual and that no environmental restrictions are required by any Status
of Forces Agreement (SOFA) or other international agreements. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
(CEAA) is binding on DND/CF and applies also to operations and activities outside the territorial boundaries of
Canada. Although a provision in the act allows for an exclusion to the requirement to conduct a formal EA for
emergency operations, all attempts should still be made to include environmental considerations at all levels of
planning. On behalf of the NDHQ/J3, the J3 Engr, in concert with the TF Engr will develop all aspects of the impact
of operations on the environment as part of the planning process, which will then be implemented by the TF Engr.
NDHQ/DGE, Command, and Formation Environmental staffs are essential sources of guidance in these aspects.
3. A separate annex or appendix for ensuring that proper attention is given to environmental considerations
will be included as part of the Military Engr SUP in each operational order under which units will deploy (Annex E).
The annex or appendix should include, but not be limited to, the following major sections:
a. Policies and responsibilities to protect and preserve the environment during the deployment.
g. Spill plans.
4-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION IV
1. Introduction. Knowledge and the correct application of both national and international laws in planning and
conducting CF operations, is the responsibility of commanders at all levels. Engr aspects related to laws, such as
environmental impacts, the use of mines or the destruction of infrastructure for combat purposes can affect the
provision as well as the level of support to the mission.
2. The Law of Armed Conflict is described in B-GG-005-004/AF-005 - Use of Force in CF Operations, and is
the basis from which all commanders are guided to consider the legal implications in planning, developing and
providing engr support to operations. At times, as a result of war or conflict, the scope of military engr support tasks
or projects becomes a focal point in establishing a sense of stability or order.
3. The law of armed conflict is intended to protect combatants from unnecessary suffering, property from
unnecessary destruction and to facilitate the restoration of peace upon the conclusion of hostilities. A large part
of achieving this will be through the reconstruction of the area. The TF Engr will be required to evaluate all engr
reconstruction tasks for relevance and prioritization. It is also the responsibility of the TF Engr to coordinate with
component engrs and the commanding officer of the ESU so that the application of policy guidelines regarding these
tasks are consistent throughout the area of operations.
4. Application of Law and Legal Considerations. In planning an operation, strategic and operational level
planners and commanders must take into account a number of legal considerations. International and Canadian
laws, bilateral and multi-lateral agreements, conventions, charters and agreements, at times can be confusing,
conflicting and cause debate over sensitive issues that CF members could face. It is however the responsibility of
all members of the CF to apply common sense and to abide by and prevent violations of the laws by others.
5. It is the responsibility of NDHQ/J3 Engr to ensure that legal considerations on military engr planning are
reflected in the strategic level planning of the operation.
1. General. CF ROE are formulated and promulgated by the CDS, with direction from the government, and
are designed to remove any legal or semantic ambiguity which could lead a commander to inadvertently violate
national policy by his actions. ROE provides guidance and instructions to commanders and commanding officers
within the framework of the overall political directives. They define the degree and manner in which force may be
applied and are designed to ensure the application of the force is controlled. ROE inform commanders of the degree
of constraint (prohibitive) or freedom (permissive) permitted when carrying out their assigned tasks.
2. ROE are applicable at all stages of war, operations other than war and peace support operations. At times,
Canadian forces, could operate in a combined operation with other NATO forces or non-NATO forces under national
or other control. These ROE must be agreed to by the participating nations during operation planning. Other than
the combined operation ROE, National ROE will also be issued to CF personnel, and if they are in conflict, National
ROE have precedence.
3. Engineer Factors affecting ROE. Engr operations, notably barrier operations, can effect considerably the
vital needs of the population and the basis of their existence, not only in war but also in times of tension and crisis.
Therefore barrier operations and denial measures are always restricted. These restrictions and conditions can be
the result of international conventions, the sovereignty of a host nation or of ROE.
4. The purpose of combat engr related ROE is to authorise the preparation and execution of barriers,
obstacles, minefields and denial measures. Detailed procedures may be required to be promulgated by the TF Engr
4-9
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
or TFC for the conduct of demolition operations. These procedures must be in accordance with the authorised
ROE.
5. Barrier related ROE must reflect the fundamental tenets of the law of armed conflict, military necessity and
proportionality. Necessity dictates that force should not be used unless essential to achieve a military objective.
The concept of proportionality dictates that military action or response is in proportion to the desired military
objective; a corollary is that collateral damage should be minimised where possible. These basic principles mean
with regards to barrier measures that the execution of barriers will not be automatic. The execution will depend
exclusively on the development of the situation and the course of the battle within the context of the current ROE.
6. In the planning and execution of obstacles and denial measures, the protection of vital interests of the
population is to be taken into consideration by the TF Engr and component engrs. They may not result in any
greater damage and destruction than is absolutely necessary for achieving the military objective.
7. To achieve the objective of an operation, or provide more efficient or effective engr support to an operation,
it may be necessary to develop additional or modify existing ROE. Requests for authority to change or modify
existing ROE as concerning engr operations will be promulgated from either the component engr/TF Engr and staffed
through the TFC to the CDS, info NDHQ/J3 Engr.
1. ROE are clearly a command issue, promulgated by the CDS for CF personnel. As already discussed in
this chapter, ROE are fundamentally a means of protecting the innocent or preventing excessive or collateral damage
in war/operations. They are oriented towards someone or something else other than friendly forces.
2. On the other hand, the concept of military engr Risk Assessment Guidelines are designed to protect
friendly forces. They are promulgated by the NDHQ/J3 Engr for inclusion in the operation order by the operational
planning staff. They are parameters that should be evaluated to ensure that any task taken on by military engrs in
support of CF personnel, DND/CF national interests or the operation itself are justified and considered against the
legal ramifications should something go wrong. They will be situation dependent restrictions as related to engr
operations in support of the TFC. They are related to engr tasks such as EOD/BMD, mine/UXO/BT clearance or
any other task that has inherent risks involved due to the nature of the task. The Risk Assessment Guidelines are
described in Annex F to this chapter.
4-10
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION V
1. The employment of the military engineer fire fighters in the theatre of operations is an essential consideration
for force protection. Fire can be caused from the results of an attack by enemy forces, insurgents or any number
of other causes. Unless quickly contained, controlled and extinguished, the resultant effects can devastate the
TFC’s ability to project combat power. It is the TF Engr’s responsibility to advise the TFC on the proper level of fire
protection and provision services within the theatre of operations.
2. The ESU contains the majority of expertise and advice on fire fighting concerns within the fire protection unit.
Regardless of this concentration of expertise, each component commander is responsible to ensure adequate fire
protection capabilities for personnel and equipment within the components. This can be accomplished in a variety
means such as HNS, in theatre service contractor, dedicated military fire fighters, trained auxiliaries, or a
combination of these listed.
3. The ESU will maintain an expertise and the capability to perform the following tasks throughout the theatre
of operations:
b. Fire Engineering;
4. The ESU Fire Protection unit will maintain their primary skills in structural fire protection and be equipped
for theatre operations accordingly. In areas where HNS fire fighting capability is available to the levels required to
support the force, then the size and mandate of the fire protection unit can be adjusted accordingly. Fire fighters
may be required to perform Crash Fire Rescue tasks in support of tactical helicopter operations within the
components. If required to provide dedicated fire rescue response in support of a theatre level airfield, then the ESU
fire protection unit resources must be augmented accordingly.
5. The military fire fighter is a multi-disciplined soldier capable of providing valuable skills and advice in
Emergency Response. Their skills and capabilities include specialized training in Haz Mat Response, Emergency
First Aid, respiratory protection, NBCD, and proficiency as trades helpers in many construction trades. The integral
water resource capability makes them an ideal asset in assisting with decontamination tasks.
4-11
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 4
101. GENERAL
1. The military engr estimate will be very similar to the formal operations estimate in that the process as well
as many factors will be similar. However, the engr estimate should concentrate on only those factors that have
relevance to engineering deductions that could affect the force mission. The quantity of information that could be
considered is substantial, therefore it is important that a complete and thorough estimate and planning process is
completed, given early warning and timely information obtained from an engr reconnaissance. The engr
reconnaissance must be completed by engrs who can assess the technical impact of the factors upon which
support levels and materiel requirements will be based. In general it could be considered that the more adverse the
conditions of the mission or operation, the more engr effort that will be required.
2. The estimate falls out of the mission analysis, which is part of the second step of the operational planning
process ORIENTATION. The estimate itself starts the third step, which is CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT.
4A-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 4
Issuing Headquarters
Location
Date and Time of Issue
1. Mission. The Mission should be to provide military engineering support to the TF. The achievement of the
mission could involve several engr units, organizations and command elements. The principles of employing engr
support should be given maximum consideration to achieve the mission.
2. Assumptions. Assumptions that affect the estimate and not necessarily assumptions made by the
commander for planning purposes should only be considered.
3. Engineering Factors Affecting the Mission. Engineering factors generally revolve around time, manpower
and resources. However, consideration should also be given to the maintenance of accurate and complete financial
records since costs and responsibility can make for critical and at times controversial decisions. Compromise
between comfort and necessity sometimes also create difficult engineering decisions.
4. The following list of Factors and Deductions are by no means the absolute definitive list. Different operations
could have other very relative factors of the estimate that should be considered in the planning process.
1 ENEMY
intentions requirements for survivability
capabilities (incl NBC & surveillance capabilities) protection of facilities, LOC, ADR
civil war/terrorists/irregulars threat degree of security engineering
engr capabilities,organizations,existing obstacles
2 GROUND -TERRAIN
natural features, rivers, coastlines, mobility requirements
4A-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 4
3 OWN TROOPS
overall force levels requirements for accommodations
length of mission (standards -comfort, cost, resources,
availability of funding types of facilities, maintenance)
required construction standards
availability of real property and methods of obtaining them requirements for Environmental
environmental restrictions imposed by Canada or Assessments
coalition/UN/HN policy hazardous waste disposal
international/national laws/agreements emergency clean-up procedures
sensitive areas, cultural/archeological significant areas any restrictions to construction of
politics, culture, languages, religion, government, economy, defences, obstacles
history language translation services, guides,
escorts
currency for local purchase
4A-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 4
5 ASSESSMENT OF TASKS
use of the reconnaissance check-list distinguish between assigned versus
implied tasks
fully comprehend the definitions of ROE
for tasks such as mine clearance tasks
risk assessment authority
sustainment capabilities
any constraints or restraints
4. Comparison of Courses. The comparison of courses are not as objective as the decision between a left
or right flanking attack. It is more of an analysis of the organization of forces such as close support or general
support to best support the operational force to achieve the mission. Detailed military engr support planning of
tasks, equipment and personnel before deploying to a theatre of operations is essential.
5. Outline Plan. The aim of this final step of the estimate within the planning process is to produce an engr
supporting plan to best support the TFC based on his Concept of Operations (COO). This estimate will lead to the
development of the Military Engineering Supporting Plan (SUP)(Annex C) after the decision step which involves a
decision briefing to select the best course of action. Since all plans have a limited period of validity due to the
changing circumstances upon which the plans were assigned, it will also be necessary to conduct the final step
of the operational planning process, PLAN REVIEW. Other or unforseen estimate factors could lead to future
considerations at this step.
Commander's Signature
Annexes/Supporting Documents
Distribution List
4A-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 4
1. Engr information is unprocessed data which may be used in the production of engr intelligence. Engr
information may come from many sources including, for example, satellites, ground and air reconnaissance,
computer data bases, and prisoners of war. Not all of the information listed below will necessarily be required by
the TF Engr. It is the TF Engr's responsibility to possess some of the information already. However, at times the
information will need to be collected by resources controlled by the J2. When information is required, the TF Engr
must identify his information requirements to the J2 staff for inclusion in the intelligence collection plan. Specific
areas of engr information are:
(1) The location, strength and intention of enemy force engr units.
(2) Enemy force engr techniques such as obstacle clearance and construction, the construction of field
fortifications, booby trapping and the influence that this has on our operations.
(3) Enemy force technical information, particularly engr equipment, unexploded ordnance, mines and
explosives.
(4) Enemy force capabilities for smart munitions, penetration of hardened structures and missiles and their
effects on survivability of infrastructure.
(3) Friendly force technical information, particularly engr equipment, potential unexploded ordnance, mines
and explosives.
(4) Transportation requirements for heavy and oversize engr equipment and materials.
c. Information on Resources.
(1) The condition and availability of existing infrastructure including the LOC.
(2) The availability of engr support from allies and through HNS agreements.
(4) The availability, cost and suitability of construction materials and equipment which can be used to carry
out engr operations.
d. Geomatics Information.
(1) Climatic, geographic and terrain data for the area of operations and their effects on operations and engr
support.
4B-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 4
1. Engr intelligence is processed information concerning enemy force and friendly engr operations and
capabilities, resources information, and military geomatics information required for the planning and execution of
CF operations. Engr intelligence is but one element of the complete intelligence system; many items of engr
intelligence are of interest to other agencies, and similarly, many items of operational intelligence or information are
of interest to engrs.
2. The TF Engr will be the central collection and development point for engr intelligence and its subsequent
dissemination. In conjunction with the J2, the TF Engr will identify requirements for specific essential elements of
engr intelligence, collect engr intelligence and ensure that it is disseminated as required.
a. advise the TFC on the conception and execution of the operational plan;
d. plan the use and deployment of military engrs in accordance with the operational plan.
4B-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex C to
Chapter 4
101. GENERAL
1. During the DECISION step, the TF Engr and his staff will have coordinated strategic and operational level
military engr planning with NDHQ/J3 Engr. The appropriate military engr input will have been provided into the COO
which has allowed component engrs to commence their planning process. The TF Engr will have developed a
military engr support concept complementary to the TFC's COO. Step five, PLAN DEVELOPMENT, consists of
developing, approving and issuing the main and supporting plans. The Military Engineering Supporting Plan (SUP)
is a stand alone document because of the quantity of information contained in it, as seen in the following pages.
4C-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex C to
Chapter 4
1. Situation.
a. General.
b. Enemy Force.
c. Friendly Forces.
d. Engr Intelligence.
e. Assumptions.
(1) Political.
(2) Military.
(3) Engr.
2. Mission. To provide effective and sustainable military engineering support to the Canadian TF during all
phases of TF operations.
3. Execution.
a. General.
b. Concept of Engr Operations.
(1) TF Engr Staff.
(2) ESU.
(3) Component Engrs.
(4) Additional Engrs.
c. Phases.
d. Task Allocation. (By Phase)
e. Coordinating Instructions.
(1) Land Mine/Booby Trap and EOD/BMD Risk Assessment Guidelines.
(2) Land Mine/Booby Trap and EOD/BMD Policy Guidelines.
(3) Environmental Protection Policy.
(4) Construction Standards.
(5) Survivability and Protective Construction Policy.
(6) General Priority of Work.
(7) Fire Protection Policy.
4C-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex C to
Chapter 4
4C-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex C to
Chapter 4
8. Civil-Military Cooperation.
a. Control of Refugees.
b. Feeding and Treatment of Civilians.
c. Host Nation Support.
d. Status of Force Agreement (SOFA).
e. Guidelines for Engr CIMIC tasks.
f. Real Property Management Activities.
g. Public Affairs.
9. Miscellaneous.
10. Command and Control.
a. Command and Control Relationships.
b. Communications and Information Services.
Commander's Signature
Annexes
A. Operational Level Engr Tasks
B. ESU Organization
C. Land Mine/Booby Trap and EOD/BMD Risk Assessment Guidelines
D. Environmental Protection Policy Guidelines
E. Geomatics Support
F. Construction Standards
G. Survivability and Protective Construction Policy
H. Civil Affairs Engineering Guidelines
I. Engr Related Standardization Agreements
J. Theatre Engr Recce Proforma
4C-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex D to
Chapter 4
Geomatics Support Annex Format and Contents. The NDHQ/J2 Geo staff can advise in the preparation of a
Geomatics Support Annex. The annex should address Situation, Mission, Execution, Coordinating Instructions,
Service Support, and Command and Signal. There would be tabular appendices to indicate areas where map or
chart (or other product) coverage is required, types of products (including services) required, quantities required for
all phases of the operation (including replenishment), etc. A geomatics support annex would be based upon
formation geomatics policies, directives and SOPs.
GEOMATICS SUPPORT ( )
1. ( ) SITUATION (General).
a. ( ) Requirements. Include a statement that indicates to whom this Annex applies for the planning and
conduct of geomatics support a the specific requirement. Also include a statement indicating the level (e.g.
operational, tactical, etc) at which support will be provided as part of the operations to assist in achieving
all of the formation's objectives. List the geomatics products that are required to support this plan (see
Appendix 1). Show desired area coverage and quantitative requirements using an appendix if necessary or
by portraying them graphically.
(1) ( ) Phase 1 - Planning. Summarize the requirements for geomatics resources and map depot
activities. Include the area of operations, emphasizing time planning data of this operation.
(2) ( ) Phase 2 - Deployment. Indicate geomatics requirements to move units from their normal
peacetime locations into the area of operations, identify printing & distribution requirements. If deemed
a critical task there may be a requirement for nations to contribute map print assets either at home or
deployed.
(3) ( ) Phase 3 - Operations. Geomatics support during this phase is usually a reactionary operational
necessity; indicate if this is the case or state another.
(4) ( ) Phase 4 - Redeployment. Summarize the requirements for redeploying geomatics resources and
map depot activities. Include the disposition of all residual geomatics products and the formations that
will be included in the coordination of this action.
b. ( ) Assumptions. The assumptions should state expected conditions over which the commander has no
control. The following areas of concern should be commented on:
4D-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex D to
Chapter 4
(3) Which resources will be assigned to operate a Central Map Depot (CMD) and subsequently ship to the
Theatre Map Depot(s) (TMD); and
(4) Nations may be requested to honor outstanding map supply contracts (within existing Memorandum
Of Understanding (MOUs) or Letters Of Agreement (LOA). On a case by case basis, nations may be
asked to assume production responsibility for some designated map series; the organization to act
as the interface between the requester and producing nations must be specified.
c. ( ) Priorities. Support and Production. Indicate the priority of geomatics support to units and the priority
of production for geomatics products.
d. ( ) Supporting Capabilities. The provision of geomatics support is a national responsibility. Allied, host
nations, etc might provide products (maps and charts) but do provide services (terrain analysis, map
distribution, etc).
3. ( ) EXECUTION.
a. ( ) Concept of Geomatics Operation. Give a broad statement on how the necessary geomatics support
will be provided to meet the commander=s overall mission requirement. Comments on the following should
be included:
(1) incoming forces are to deploy with sufficient movement and planning stocks for the first xx days (30
days is traditional) of operational requirements;
(2) the system of providing geomatics support for related maritime and air operations should be stated as
well as the method of supplying map/chart either through national resources at home station prior to
deployment or from related operational areas or air bases;
(6) list the personnel assigned or attached and those required where not currently assigned. Specify the
type of command relationship desired plus the type and duration of support required. Specify any
unique geomatic equipment requirements;
(7) there is a growing requirement to pass large volumes of digital data via electronic means. These
requirements will have to be addressed; and
4D-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex D to
Chapter 4
(4) HQ JTF Sector / Component (Bde / Wing / Task Gp) (Could Expect to be Assigned a AGeomatics NCO
- Sector Geo).
c. ( ) Designated Geospatial Information and Special Products. All products designated by Task Force
(TF) policy must be listed. An annex (table see Appendix 2) is preferable. The TF policy must cover the
datum, grid, ellipsoid etc to be used for navigation systems, survey systems, Global Positioning System
(GPS) receiver settings, targeting, etc. It may also cover specific standards for digital geospatial data
exchange and the application of only certified data and data manipulation tools.
d. ( ) Coordinating Instructions.
(1) ( ) Release Authority. Comment on the releasability of all designated products (e.g. controlled
distribution, "eyes only", etc), who the authority for release is (e.g. Ops Staff) and how and where any
problems are to be resolved. Comments to cover both national and in-theatre are required.
(2) ( ) Introduction of New Products. Indicate how and who will introduce new editions (or products).
(3) ( ) Datum/Grid. Indicate the datum and coordinate system that will be used [Usually using Universal
Transverse Mercator (UTM) map coordinates derived from World Geodetic System (WGS) 1984
{Particular attention must be paid to the map legend}].
(4) ( ) Current Stocks. Provide a general statement regarding the availability and adequacy of the
Geomatics data and related material required to support the plan.
(5) ( ) Noted Geographic Errors. How problems with new editions, grid errors, map disagreement with
ground truth, or units reporting coordinates in other than WGS 84 values all which could endanger life
or effect operations, are to be reported.
(6) ( ) Funding of Geomatics Products. Comment on how geomatics products will be funded, both in
a national and in-theatre setting.
(7) ( ) Provision of Products to Other Forces. Comment on how geomatics products will be provided,
both in a national and in-theatre setting.
b. Transportation. (it should be noted that geomatic support personnel may require the provision of vehicles);
c. Requirements to account for geomatics products for tracking; and billing purposes.
a. ( ) Command Relationships. Include primary and alternate locations of all major geomatics support
groups. Specify the command and control relationships between the command and its attached or supporting
geomatics groups.
4D-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex D to
Chapter 4
b. ( ) Communications. Provide a statement describing the scope and types of any special communications
support that is required for operations. Geomatics groups have limited communications capabilities, thus,
explicit tasks need to be assigned to ensure that these groups are effectively supported by the command=s
assets. This is especially important in the case of distribution of operational map supplies to the users.
d. ( ) Reports. Indicate requirement for reports such as, in the case of a NATO mission, the initial Geographic
Situation Report (GEOSITREP) and follow on timings. See Appendix 5 for format.
4D-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex D to
Chapter 4
1. Aeronautical Products.
2. Hydrographic Products.
3. Topographic Products.
5. Special Requirements:
NOTES
B. Ensure that a clear description of the area to be covered, described by geographic coordinates, political
boundaries and recognizable geographical areas are given. A graphic to support requests is required unless
the specific product is ordered, such as maps using the Map Demand Form (CF 391) at
CFAO 36-17.
C. List the required number of each item requested. Requirements for Aadvance party map issue@, Ainitial map
issue@ ( planning and operations) and sustainment (after 30 days) requirements are needed.
D. Planning Tables are Available from J2 Geo Ops. It is important that requirements for National Command and
Support Elements remaining in Canada also be depicted.
4D-5/4D-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AND FORMAT FOR THE COMPLETION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
101. GENERAL
1. The DND EA Manual A-EN-007-000/FP-001 provides detailed directions on the completion of environmental
assessments. The purpose of this annex is to provide supplementary guidance to military engr planners on how to
consider the environmental impact of operations. An Environmental Assessment (EA) is required either in response
to the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) or as ADue Diligence@ to ensure that
all practicable measures to minimize damage and avoid needless or inadvertent violation of environmental laws are
taken. When and where feasible, restoration measures, or provision of restoration measures should be considered.
102. POLICY
1. Operations will be planned and conducted with appropriate consideration of their effect on the environment.
"Primacy of Operations" must be the principal focus of all commanders. However, operations must be planned to
minimize environmental impacts or reduce impacts through the use of mitigation.
2. The TF Engr will advise the TFC on all aspects of environmental impact of operations. Coordination with other
TFHQ staff principals such as the J5 CIMIC, J4 LOG or the Medical Group for the detailed aspects of environmental
prevention, or the control or disposal of wastes will be executed through the TF Engr Cell.
1. The provisions of CEAA are binding on the DND/CF and apply to operations and activities outside of the
territorial boundaries of Canada. In the case of Canadian formations under OPCOM of an allied formation and
responsible to the TFHQ for national matters, the TFC, as advised by the TF Engr, will ensure that as a minimum,
Canadian Environmental standards are applied. Although a provision in the Act allows for an exclusion for
emergency operations, mitigative actions to be ordered for operations abroad will have to include measures required
by the laws of the country in the Area of Operations (AO), United Nations force directives or coalition force standing
orders as they exist at the time. All provisions for environmental mitigation will have to be clearly stated in any MOU
or SOFA established prior to deployment.
2. The pertinent information on environmental laws, if they exist, will be available from CIMIC organizations
already in-theatre and/or the lawful civil authority. The objectives are to gain and maintain the support of the local
population, preserve the environment of another country and to promote sanitary conditions for the continuing health
of Canadian personnel.
1. Although CEAA applies nationwide, bases and provinces have additional, different regulations to be complied
with. The sources of information for these provisions as they pertain to a military base include the J3 staff ,
NDHQ/DGE, and the Base/Formation Environmental Officer. These personnel must be consulted when gathering
information for an EA.
2. For operations and training to be conducted on non-DND and private land, it is essential to consult with
NDHQ/DGE, Command, Formation or Base Environmental staff of the nearest military base (as applicable), who will
advise and assist in effecting liaison with provincial and other applicable environmental departments. The provisions
of the CEAA for national emergencies should be clarified with NDHQ/DGE or the applicable Command for the
particular operation.
4E-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. Water Management.
a. Certification of Local Water Resources. If local water is to be used for consumption by CF personnel,
it must be certified as such by medical authorities using current preventive medicine procedures. The quality
of the water source will determine the purification requirements. Coordination between the contingent engrs
or TF Engr for the provision of water and the medical personnel to certify potability based on established
health guidelines, must be effected.
b. Water Course Protection. Maximum effort must be made to prevent siltation, bottom damage, bank
erosion and contamination during movement, construction/maintenance, resupply or other activities on or
near water sources.
c. Water Conservation. Maximum effort will be made to prevent wastage and misuse of water stocks.
2. Solid Waste and Liquid Waste Management. Disposal of solid and liquid wastes will be dependant upon
the location and the surrounding environment of the area where the waste is to be disposed and the nature of the
operation.
a. Solid Waste. The environmental method of choice for the disposal of solid waste or dry garbage should be
burial in existing landfills. If existing landfills are not available, burial of waste should employ the
characteristics typical of landfill operations. Landfill operations will not be conducted in the vicinity of water
courses. Burning of solid waste is an acceptable alternative. (Units operating in Canada must check with
local environmental authorities for burning permits).
b. Organic Waste. As with solid waste, disposal should be in accordance with local regulations through local
contract. Failing this, incineration, followed by burial is the preferred method of disposal.
c. Human Waste. The preferred methods of disposal in order of precedence are: sanitary water disposal and
treatment systems, portable latrines, burnout latrines, and slit trenches.
d. Grey Water. Effluent from showers/bathing facilities must be located downstream of any military or civilian
water sources. Construction shall ensure proper drainage of grey water runoff to preclude pooling. All
measures will be taken to prevent creation of new pest breeding sites.
a. Definitions.
(1) Hazardous Waste. Hazardous waste is defined as any material left from a process or resulting from
maintenance which poses a threat to health or the environment.
(2) Medical Waste. Medical waste is defined as a sub-category of hazardous waste which include all bio-
medical wastes such as limbs, organs and blood, needles, syringes, pharmaceuticals and any medical
associated chemicals such as x-ray fluids.
(3) Hazardous Material. Hazardous material means dangerous substances, dangerous goods, hazardous
commodities, and hazardous products, such as poisons, corrosive agents, flammable substances,
ammunition, explosives, radioactive substances, or any other material that can endanger life or well
being or the environment if handled improperly.
(a) Hazardous Material Use. Use of hazardous materials will comply with WHMIS regulations
as a minimum.
4E-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
(b) Hazardous Material Storage. Hazardous Materials will be maintained in accordance with
appropriate national directives as a minimum.
(c) Spill Prevention and Control. Each major size unit will have a spill prevention/response plan
complete with the appropriate response equipment.
(d) Incident Reporting. Any environmental incident/accident or hazardous materials spill will be
reported through the chain-of-command and passed to TF Engr as a Significant Incident Report
(SIR). The TF Engr will ensure that NDHQ/J3 Engr and NDHQ/DEnvP are informed.
(e) Hazardous Waste Disposal. Hazardous waste such as oily waste and batteries will not be
disposed of in or on the ground, or in any waterway. These wastes must be collected in
containers brought by the national forces and brought to an established collection point.
(f) Medical Waste Disposal. Medical waste in a theatre of operations will be disposed either by
incineration, other suitable method or by local contract with medical agencies of the Host
Nation. The TF Engr is responsible for the disposal method, however coordination with the
CMG or the operation Medical unit must be affected to ensure the standard or quality of the
disposal method does not have any residual environmental effects or present any danger to
other personnel or the local population. Ashes should be disposed of by burial in an
appropriate landfill site or if for religious of ethical reasons, human anatomical waste consisting
of organs or body parts may in some cases be buried with human remains in a cemetery. The
standards or guidelines by which disposal will be executed are described in B-GG-005-004/AF-
017 - Medical Support to CF Operations.
4. Flora and Fauna Protection. Destruction of flora and fauna for movement and clearance of small areas
(fields of fire, for base construction, observation posts, etc) and for welfare (health and safety requirements) is
permitted. Destruction and clearing of large areas, must be approved through operational channels to the TF Engr.
If the specific method for large scale clearing operations includes the use of insecticides, this must also be
coordinated and approved through medical channels due to the factors of toxicity that could have residual health
effects on our own personnel.
a. basing and construction operations in the vicinity of archaeological and historical buildings and areas should
be minimized;
b. military operations (offensive or defensive) will not employ, target or destroy archeological, cultural and
heritage sites unless absolutely necessary;
c. looting, desecration or damaging of archeological, cultural or heritage sites will not be condoned or permitted;
and
d. any damage, whether by hostile and/or non-hostile forces, to archaeological and historical areas will be
reported through operational channels.
6. Base and Installation Operations. The operations and camps and installations will conform to the
environmental regulations as detailed by the TFHQ/TF Engr or the appropriate theatre authority.
4E-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
7. For additional guidance to complete an EA, see the EA Manual. EAs conducted under the CEAA are to be
forwarded to NDHQ/DGE through the appropriate chain of command channels as early as possible in the planning
process (Part One to be submitted as soon as planning commences).
4E-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
(in accordance with the procedures as defined by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA))
2. Command/Formation//Unit/Base.
3. Registration.
b. OPI: Identify the name, rank, position, and telephone number of the individual responsible for the OEPA.
Should be the same as Block 14g.
c. Assessed By: Identify the name, rank, position, and telephone number of the individual or consultant
responsible for conducting the assessment of the OEPA. Should be the same as Block 14f.
d. EA File #: 1267-xxxx-zzzz, where xxxx = the Unit Identification Code and zzzz = a locally assigned number,
such as 0001.
e. FEAI #: Issued through environmental staff for CEAA registered environmental assessments only.
4. OEPA Location. Provide an accurate description of the OEPA location, including proximity to the nearest
city, town or training area, where applicable.
a. AssessmentContact: The assessment contact will normally be the staff whose main responsibility will
be to assess the OEPA and to answer questions from the public.
b. Document Contact: The document contact will normally be the staff whose main responsibility,
concerning the public registry, will be to provide copies of EA documents to the public. The assessment
contact and the document contact may be the same.
4E-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
PART II - ASSESSMENT
7. OEPA Details.
a. GeneralDescription: Describe the OEPA in detail, covering its entire lifespan. Include any pertinent
components, such as construction, procurement, operation, maintenance, disposal and/or abandonment.
Also include pertinent information on the size of buildings, locations, associated works, number of
personnel, vehicles or ships and their types. These descriptions will provide the basis for completing the
columns in the matrix at
Block 12.
b. Components: List and describe all components (stages, procedures, and detailed activities)
8. Consultation.
a. Internal: List the contacts consulted from sources internal to DND, including name, rank, and position.
Examples of internal resources are environmental staff, CE staff, and natural resources staff.
b. External: Provide details on external consultation, including the method used, when conducted, who
was consulted and concerns raised. Examples of this are regulatory agencies, municipalities, consultants
and special interest groups.
9. Documentation.
a. Regulations and Policies: List the federal, provincial or municipal regulations and the DND regulations
and policies which have a bearing on the project/activity. Examples are the Canadian Environmental
Assessment Act, the Fisheries Act, and Base or Range Standing Orders.
b. Other References: List the sources of information used, including literature, exercise instructions, maps,
drawings, previous environmental assessments or Base Environmental Baseline Studies.
10. Site Visits. Provide details of site visits, including when conducted, by whom, and the results of the visits.
a. Boundaries: Describe the associated physical boundaries and time periods, such as the time of day,
week, month and season during which the project will occur, or the timespan during which the effects will be
significant.
c. Main Valued Ecosystems: List all pertinent valued ecosystem components that are affected by the
OEPA, such as endangered plant and animal species, archaeological sites, mature forests, etc. The valued
ecosystem components listed across the top of the matrix in Block 12 can be used as a guide, but mention
should be made of the following; Watershed, Vegetation, Soil Quality and Fish and Wildlife.
4E-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
4E-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
4E-8
Annex E to
Chapter 4
a. Components. For each of the components listed in the matrix, an individual component description must
be completed. It is useful to assess components as a group when the potential impacts and corresponding
mitigative measures are similar (ie: excavation, ground clearing and digging - effects on soils).
All bivouac sites will require areas for the handling and storage of POL products of all natures (vehicle fuel,
industrial gases, oil, grease, fuel for stoves) which could cause adverse effects if not properly treated.
There are several engineering components that could be assessed in this method. Some of them include:
Occupation of Bivouac and Command Posts
MLBU Construction and Operation
Disposal of Medical Waste
Maintenance of Vehicles and Equipment
Operation of Water Points
Aircraft Operations
Digging and Field Defenses
Camouflage of Vehicles and Installations
Water Crossing Operations
Demolition Training and Live Fire Exercises
Manoeuvre of Large Numbers of Vehicles
b. Valued Ecosystems Affected:Specify the VECs that could potentially be affected by the component
described in 13a, such as soils, ground water, terrain, or habitats. It is important to identify any critical
components, once known, such as specific species, sensitive areas, local cultural or heritage features. In
listing the VECs, also describe the nature of the effects using previous studies, professional knowledge,
observations, estimates, previous experience, extrapolation or models. The description should include the
magnitude, duration, timing, extent and geographic distribution of the predicted effect.
c. Mitigation Measures. Identify any mitigation measures, such as the alteration of an implementation
schedule to avoid spawning periods, alteration to project/activity design, or procedures for range standing
orders. Every effort should be made to mitigate significant effects to insignificant levels.
d. Significance. Mark an "X" next to the applicable level (Unknown, Not Likely Significant, or Likely
Significant). Factors such as magnitude, prevalence, duration, frequency, reversibility, ecological context,
associated risk and setting criteria which may be used for determining significance.
e. Monitoring. Describe any monitoring measures to be taken. Monitoring ensures that impacts predictions
were accurate; that avoidance, mitigation and compensation measures achieved their objectives; that
regulations and standards were met. Typical monitoring measures may include soil, air and water sampling
or seasonal site visits. Indicate if monitoring is not required.
4E-9
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex E to
Chapter 4
14. Conclusions:
a. Project Title:
b. Assessment Summary:
e. Recommendations:
4E-10
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex F to
Chapter 4
101. GENERAL
1. Land mines, booby traps and unexploded ordnance (UXO) poses a real and direct threat to CF personnel
and activities on deployed operations. In all cases where the threat of land mines, booby traps and UXO exists,
strict observance of operational procedures, drills and directions will reduce this risk.
2. To conduct a realistic risk assessment, commanders and engrs require clear and easily understood
guidelines to ensure all elements involved know the operational limits placed on them from NDHQ and the Canadian
government.
102. AIM
1. To provide guidelines for the degree of risk military engrs may take in land mine/booby trap and explosive
ordnance disposal (EOD)/battlefield munitions disposal (BMD) operations on deployed missions.
103. CONCEPT
1. The concept for use of the risk assessment guidelines is given below:
a. separate land mine/booby trap and EOD/BMD guidelines will be issued. While there may be similarities
between land mine/booby trap and EOD/BMD operations, the differences in levels of training and equipment
required necessitates separate guidance;
b. CF guidelines will be issued prior to deployment by NDHQ/J3 Engr, in consultation with the NDHQ/J staff;
c. TFC may impose more restrictive guidelines but cannot issue less restrictive guidelines without prior
authority from NDHQ;
d. the guidelines do not supersede authorized Rules of Engagement (ROE) issued by the CDS; and
e. operational necessity, safety considerations and the inherent right to self-defence/preservation will prevail
over the guidelines.
104. GUIDELINES
1. General. For the purpose of the risk guidelines, "mine" is used to mean land mine/booby trap operations
and "UXO" to mean EOD/BMD operations. The guidelines are divided into clearance and associated operations.
Clearance Operations
4F-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex F to
Chapter 4
Associated Activities
4F-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex F to
Chapter 4
2. Example of Guideline Use. The following are examples of land mine and EOD/BMD (UXO) direction to
a deployed force:
a. Land Mine Clearance Operation. "Authorized to conduct land mine operations 1B, 2B, 3A, 4A, 5B, 6B,
7A." (i.e. CF troops are permitted to: clear mines that pose an immediate threat to Allied forces; clear mines
necessary to allow successful completion of CF assigned missions; conduct mine awareness training for
CF troops only; monitor mine clearing by others; and coordinate mine clearing by other parties but not
allowed within minefields. CF troops are not permitted to: conduct general clearance unless it poses an
immediated threat to Allied Forces or critical to CF assigned missions and not authorized to supervise mine
clearance by others.)
b. EOD/BMD Operation. "Authorized to conduct EOD/BMD (UXO) operations 1A, 2B, 3A, 4B, 5B, 6B, 7A."
(i.e. CF troops are permitted to: clear UXO that pose an immediate threat to CF forces; clear UXO
necessary to allow successful completion of CF Forces assigned missions; conduct UXO awareness training
for CF and Allied troops; monitor UXO clearing by others; and coordinate mine clearing by other parties but
not allowed within UXO danger area. CF troops are not permitted to: conduct general clearance unless it
poses an immediated threat to CF troops or critical to Allied Forces or CF assigned missions and not
authorized to supervise UXO clearance by others.)
4F-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex F to
Chapter 4
105. SAFETY
1. Commanders at all levels are to ensure land mine/booby trap and/or EOD/BMD (UXO) operations are
conducted utilizing the safest approved methods and procedures commensurate with the mission requirements.
106. REPORTING
1. Any encounter by a TF element with mines, booby traps or UXO, during or outside any planned clearance
operation, whether the device is activated or not, will be reported to NDHQ using the Initial Mine/Booby Trap/UXO
Incident Report. This initial report is toallow assessment of clearance procedures, equipment and doctrine.
2. Following the initial incident report, normal CF reporting procedures for land mine, booby trap, UXO and
EOD/BMD incidents will be followed up to the TFHQ. Theatre land mine, booby trap and EOD/BMD reporting
procedures will be followed above TFHQ to NDHQ and the theatre HQ.
4F-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 5
SECTION I
1. The last strategic planning step is the PLAN REVIEW. This step commences with the Government decision
to conduct operations in accordance with the detailed plans and initiates the phases of implementation at the
tactical level. The detailed plan was developed with the commencement of the operational level of planning from the
release of the CDS wngO. Upon approving the strategic and operational level plans, the CDS will advise the
Government of the readiness of the TF and seek permission to implement the plan.
2. Once the government orders the CDS to implement the plan, an Implementation Order (implO) will be issued.
The TFC will be provided with instructions from the CDS giving his personal guidance on the conduct of operations.
TOCA will normally take place at the mounting base.
a. warning;
b. preparation;
c. deployment;
d. employment; and
e. redeployment.
1. Once the implO is issued, it directs the TFC and all supporting Commands and Agencies to execute the
relevant plans.
2. During the Warning phase, the NDHQ/J3 Engr, in conjunction with the TF Engr and Command Engr staffs,
will conduct normal staff checks, assess and confirm the engr support requirements, prepare a detailed scenario-
specific support plan, make preparations to assemble the ESU, and conduct preliminary in-theatre recce if
authorized.
3. There will be a heavy reliance on intelligence, information and recce during the warning phase. (For details
of Engr Recce see Annex A). Databases of terrain, infrastructure and HNS resources should be developed. Contact
should also be established and maintained with the civilian engineering community, aid agencies, and NGOs that
may have technical information.
4. NDHQ/J3 Engr. The NDHQ/J3 Engr staff will concentrate on the detailed strategic planning for the operation
and will:
a. provide advice to the NDHQ/J3 on military engr policy for the operation;
b. quantify personnel, equipment and material requirements for the operation and advise on sourcing. On receipt
of the warning order, NDHQ/J3 staff will immediately conduct a review of the Defence Plans associated with
5-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
existing plans and initiate procurement of no cost, long lead time items. Expenditure of funds can be
authorized at this stage if necessary;
c. adapt the organization of the ESU according to the specific scenario in consultation with National and
environmental HQ staffs and pass information to NDHQ/J1 through NDHQ/J3 for tasking. The strategic engr
support concept and the organization of ESU must be coordinated with the designated TF Engr;
d. adapt support plans for the preparation of the ESU indicating assembly and training details, according to the
specific scenario;
f. provide a representative, in coordination with the TF Engr, for the in-theatre recce party. (May be conducted
during the Preparation phase); and
5. TF Engrs. The TF Engr staff will continue the development of the operational level plan and will:
a. prepare a detailed scenario-specific Military Engr SUP for in-theatre operational level support the TF;
b. in conjunction with NDHQ/J3 Engr and the TFHQ, finalize the ESU establishment; and
c. finalize the ESU Task Force Movement Tables (TFMT) in conjunction with CO ESU.
6. ESU. The CO of the ESU will commence preparations to assemble, train and deploy the ESU and will:
b. prepare detailed orders for the assembly and training of all elements of the ESU based on the direction of
the TF Engr;
c. in conjunction with the TF Engr, finalize the ESU organization and TFMT.
7. Component engrs. Component engrs will conduct staff checks and complete tasks as directed by
component headquarters. Engr unit COs can begin training in such areas as:
b. personnel administration for family related issues such as financial, insurances, medical, etc; and
1. The preparation phase involves bringing the personnel and equipment to the assembly base and conducting
training as required. Identified shortfalls will also be rectified. During this phase, personnel from the TF Engr staff
or ESU should conduct an in-theatre recce if it was not completed during the Warning Phase. Engr advance parties
from the ESU will deploy as necessary and conduct entry tasks and preliminary works to open APODs, SPODs,
MSRs, and prepare infrastructure for the reception of the TF as part of the engr support to force projection and
sustainment planning.
2. NDHQ/J3 Engr. The NDHQ/J3 Engr staff will continue the support for preparation for the operation and will:
5-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
a. provide NDHQ/J3 Engr representation on in theatre recce if one was not completed during the warning phase.
If possible, recce will be conducted by the TF Engr and/or ESU personnel;
b. prepare for approval, and then issue detailed plans and orders through NDHQ/J3. These are normally based
on generic Capability Based Plans (CBPs);
e. review, the engr support to force projection and sustainment planning by resolving any consequences or
implications created by the following factors:
(1) terrain;
(2) infrastructure;
(3) logistics;
(5) TF composition and the order of deployment by phase, quantity, method and rate.
3. TF Engrs. The TF Engr staff will continue the preparation for deployment of engr advance party and main
body and will:
d. conduct in-theatre recce if not already conducted during the Warning Phase,
e. be prepared to deploy a forward HQ/Advance party to prepare for the reception of forces in theatre; and
4. ESU. The CO of the ESU will commence the assembly, training and deployment of advance elements of
the ESU and will be prepared to deploy HQ and selected elements, on order, to make preparations to receive forces
in theatre. This may include setting up financial arrangements in theatre, negotiation of real property, and
identification of sources of supply for engr construction materials.
5. Component engrs. Component engrs will conduct assembly and component engr training in accordance
with direction from respective component headquarters.
1. If there is a high security threat to the deployment and combat troops are deployed initially, they should be
accompanied by their close support engrs. If the situation is more benign, general support (entry) engrs should
arrive first to allow time for the preparation of infrastructure before the arrival of the main body. Elements, if not all
of the TF Engr staff and the ESU, should arrive with the advance party as part of a surge of military engr resources
at the beginning of the operation. The appropriate mix of close and general support engrs will be decided by the TFC
on the advice of the TF Engr.
5-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
2. The advice that the TF Engr provides the TFC should take into consideration that, conceivably, once entry
engrs have completed the tasks in support of force projection, they could be re-deployed out of theatre so as not
to be needlessly unemployed.
1. The TF Engr will assist the TFC and TFHQ on the employment of all engr assets of the TF. The component
engrs and the ESU will provide engr close and general support to the TF. There will be a continuous monitoring and
adjustment of the engr support to the TF as the situation changes. There may also be a possibility of repatriating
military engrs deployed as part of a "surge" element in the warning or preparation phases.
2. NDHQ/J3 Engr. The NDHQ/J3 Engr staff will continuously monitor operations, provide support as required
and will:
a. monitor the operation and exercise technical control over the TF Engr, and provide advice and support as
required; and
a. monitor the operation and provide technical engr advice and support to component engrs and the ESU, and
b. coordinate the continued engr support requirements of the components and the ESU.
4. ESU. The ESU will provide engr general support to the TF and engr close support to TF units as ordered by
TFC.
5. Component engrs. Component engrs will provide engr close support for component operations as directed
by the respective components.
1. This phase will include the necessary preparations for, and return of forces to Canada. Elements of the TF
Engr staff and the ESU will be one of the last units to redeploy. The redeployment will consist of repatriating
appropriate material and equipment, and restoring the deployment site to an acceptable environmental state.
2. The reception facilities used in the deployment can be used in the redeployment if they have been adequately
maintained. Engrs may be required to dismantle facilities for disposal or return to Canada. Arrangements may have
to be made for the handover of infrastructure to other forces or the host nation. Extensive facility restoration and
EOD/BMD may only be possible upon the cessation of hostilities and therefore will require work after redeployment
of main body of the TF.
3. Military engrs may be required to restore essential public utilities, provide hospital facilities, repair
infrastructure or provide temporary accommodation for displaced civilians.
4. If Canada has deployed mines, it is a national responsibility to recover them. Some clearance of unexploded
ordnance (UXO) and enemy laid mines may be required, but the preferred solution is to have local forces remove the
mines or use civilian contractors.
5. Extraction of a TF under pressure will require engr support to maintain routes back to the POD. Counter-
mobility operations or area denial may also be employed to assist the extraction or hinder the actions of opposing
forces.
5-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
a. establish policies concerning in-theatre disposal, transfer or return to Canada of materiel, equipment and
plant;
b. establish policies for the environmental restoration of deployment areas, and post-hostilities mine and UXO
clearance;
c. plan and coordinate with Commands the redistribution of materiel, equipment and vehicles to Canadian
bases;
d. plan for the removal or handover of infrastructure to allied forces or the host nation; and
e. provide policy guidance to NDHQ/J3 on counter-mobility and area denial operations if required.
a. coordinate the in-theatre disposal, transfer or return to Canada of engr materiel, equipment and engr heavy
equipment as ordered,
b. coordinate the removal or handover of infrastructure to allied forces or the host nation as ordered;
d. determine if a "surge" of military engr personnel is required to accomplish all redeployment tasks; and
e. provide advice to the TFC on mobility, counter-mobility and area denial operations if required.
c. be prepared to assist TF Engr in the removal or handover of infrastructure to allied forces or the host nation;
and
d. be prepared to conduct extensive facility restoration and EOD/BMD that may only be possible upon the
cessation of hostilities.
9. Component Engrs. Component engrs will re-deploy in accordance with component re-deployment plans.
5-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
1. Planning and recce are mutually supporting concepts. They are not independent of each other, but instead
rely on each other. The need for information and intelligence, is equally important as is the need for a plan or
concept of operations to decide what type of information needs to be obtained.
2. Plan development can be situationally dependent. If execution of a operation is imminent or highly likely with
short lead time, planning steps and stages leading from concept development to an Operations Order could take
place quickly. Hence, recce could be authorized very early. The time frame within the planning process at which
any recce is authorized should not preclude the level of completeness of an engr recce. The NDHQ/J3 Engr staff
will coordinate with the TF Engr and/or the component engr commander for the appropriate in-theatre military engr
representation as part of the recce party.
1. A military engr recce may be required at separate times during the planning process to support planning at
strategic, operational and tactical levels. However, when time is limited, the recce may be combined with that of
other levels. Much of the information required to provide engr intelligence may also come from recce ordered by the
strategic or operational level commanders. This fact should not negate the presence of a military engr and rely on
another arm to obtain engr intelligence.
2. All available engr intelligence including engr resources documentation and the recce check-list (Annex A),
should be used in planning a recce. The composition of the recce party required for engr planning will depend upon
the mission. Engr recce of some form will ultimately be carried out by a party from the unit(s) which are likely to
be responsible for supporting the mission.
3. Recce and planning during the warning phase are crucial in determining the overall engr requirement.
Deploying the appropriate engr elements in the advance parties can provide the capability to arrange for HNS,
procure material and equipment in theatre and also to negotiate and let contracts, including payment methods.
1. A complete and thorough engr recce forms the basis for effective and efficient engr support. Of primary
importance in the initial engr recce are:
a. the nature of the country, to include its geography, history, and demography. Additionally the political and
economic climate play an important role in developing achievable engr end-state options;
b. the laws, customs and agreements of the country, including contracting conditions, real estate procedures,
environmental laws, cultural impacts on construction, HN agreements, and international agreements;
c. the engineering environment to include climate and weather, terrain and topography, soils and geology,
elevation, vegetation, land use, hydrography, natural resources, and type, nature and amount of available
construction materials; and
d. the level and status of infrastructure to include aerial and seaports of debarkation, in-country transportation,
utilities (electrical power, water distribution systems, sanitation facilities, pipelines, and communications)
and fire protection, prevention and engineering services.
5-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
OP
GENERAL
1. Unit:
2. Name:
3. Date:
4. Time Zone:
5. Country:
a. Personnel: Officers: M___ F___ Sr NCOs: M___ F___ ORs: M___ F___ Total: M___ F___
b. Vehicles:
HLVW MLVW LSVW ILTIS LT TK HY TK LT TLR HY TLR EHE ISO OTHER REMARKS
8. Op Duration:
9. Type of Op:
10. Op Concept:
a. Relief/Peacekeeping/Intervention/etc
b. No of sites/Static/Mobile/etc
11. Topography:
5A-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
12. Meteorological:
RAIN
SNOW
PREV WIND
STORMS
OTHER
a. Capital:
b. Language(s):
c. Currency:
d. Politics:
e. Ethnic Makeup:
f. Religion(s):
g. Economics:
h. Industry:
i. Military:
j. Current Situation:
15. Infrastructure:
5A-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
3. Other Structures:
SHOWER WC OTHER
5A-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
6. POL Points:
7. Ammunition Points/TDMs:
SITE ACCN ABLUTION MESS NPF MAINT QM STORAGE POL ISO VEH PARK TOTAL
CAMP SECURITY
5A-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
SITE OBSN GD OBSN DEF POSN DEF POSNS LIGHTING REVETMENT CONSTR MATERIAL
TOWER POST POST (PERS) (WPNS) (POL/Ammo) REQR REQR
WATER SUPPLY
1. Quantities (Litres/pers/day):
POTABLE NON-POTABLE
SITE DRINKING MED FOOD TOTAL ABLUTION LAUNDRY VEH TOTAL TOTAL
PREP WASH GRAY (RAW)
2. Sources:
TYPE YIELD TMT REQR LOC / DIST TYPE YIELD SUPPLIER COST
b. Crew Size:
5A-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
b. Crew Size:
6. Nature of distribution System (i.e. water points/on site delivery, accessibility, etc):
7. Ice:
1. Requirement: (l/pers/day). Consider quantity of kitchens, shower points, laundry units, and duration of use.
5A-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
2. Existing Sewage Treatment Facilites. Type: Primary, secondary, tertiary, pump truck, portable toilets,etc
POL OTHER
OTHER UTILITIES
1. Electricity:
TYPE QTY
2. Heating:
TYPE QTY
5A-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
3. Air Conditioning/Refrigeration:
TYPE QTY
4. Lighting:
TYPE QTY
1. Material:
LUMBER
PLYWOOD
FASTNERS
SAND
GRAVEL
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
CEMENT
STEEL/METAL
MASONRY
GEOTEXTILE
5A-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
CULVERTS
DUST CONTROL
OTHER
2. Labour:
SKILLED
TRADES
UNSKILLED
Trades Helpers,
Labourers, etc
DUMPS
DOZERS
FELS
EXCAVATOR
COMPACTOR
DRILLING
TRENCHER
LOWBED
CRANES
OTHER
5A-9
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
AIRFIELDS/HELIPORTS
1. Existing Facilities:
2. Helipad Requirement:
FIRE FIGHTING
SITE CRASH RESCUE STRUCTURAL CHEMICALS REQR FIRE PROTECTION REQR REMARKS
1. Combat Diving:
Capability Required:
2. Mines:
a. Policy (Ops/humanitarian/etc):
b. Priority(OPs/RRBs/routes/etc):
d. Threat:
5A-10
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 5
AP A TK BOOBY
TRAPS
3. EOD/UXO:
a. Policy:
b. Priority(HQs/Comms/etc):
c. Threat:
SITE TYPES/QTY (Estimate) CAPABILITY LIMITATIONS TRG REQR EQPT REQR REMARKS
REQR
MOBILITY/HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION
1. Road Conditions:
5A-11
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
3. Dust Control (Matting, Road Oyl, Water, salt, chemiclas, Sand Bags etc):
5A-12/5A-12
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 6
SECTION I
DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
601. GENERAL
1. There must be a clear division of responsibilities between the component engrs and the TF engrs to make
the most efficient use of limited resources. If not, there will be needless duplication, wasted effort and gaps in the
engr support to the TF. The TFC, with advice from the TF Engr, has the ultimate decision on the precise division
of responsibilities in theatre. However, there is a need to establish doctrinal principles to guide his decision and to
focus peacetime training. This chapter will only examine those aspects where there is a potential interface problem
or possible confusion over responsibilities. In general, the responsibilities can be divided by component, by
geographic sector and by specialization.
3. Division of Responsibilities by Geographic Sector. The second fundamental concept that drives the
division of responsibilities is that of component "sectors" or "areas of responsibility." Each component will be
assigned a sector by the TFC. Component engrs will normally be responsible for providing all engr support within
their assigned sector. The ESU would be responsible for supervising engr support outside the component sectors,
although the actual work may be done by component engrs as directed by the TFC, with advice from the TF Engr.
Figure 6-1 illustrates a theatre divided into geographic sectors.
4. Division of Responsibilities by Specialization. Division of responsibilities may also be based upon the
level of specialized expertise developed and resident in the ESU or a component. In some cases, such as ADR for
the air component, marine structures for the maritime component and bridging for the land component, the expertise
is resident in the components. For tasks common to all components such as horizontal and vertical construction,
similar tasks are done by component engrs and the ESU, but the level of expertise may be different. One method
of defining the division of responsibilities based on specialization is with Construction Standards.
6-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Land
Component
LAND Headquarter
COMPONENT
SECTOR
x CA CA x
x
HELIPAD Air AIR
AIRSTRIP
Component COMPONENT
Headquarter SECTOR
xx
AIRFIELD HELIPAD
INLAND WATERWAY MAIN SUPPLY
ROUTE (MSR)
JTFHQ
HELIPAD
CMG
MARITIME COMPONENT
SECTOR
CSG HELIPAD
Maritime
Component PORT
Headquarter
5. Construction Standards. Construction for CF operations will be to the following standards (For further
details see Annex A):
a. Initial Standard. Initial standard construction is intended to be used for operations of six months or less;
b. Temporary Standard. Temporary standard construction is intended to be used for operations of six to 24
months. Temporary standard construction can be used from the start of an operation if directed by the TFC
for all or some facilities.
c. Other Construction. Construction beyond temporary standard will be considered a special case and
guidance will be issued from NDHQ.
6-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
ENGINEER TASKS
602. GENERAL
1. As previously stated, military engr support, as a whole, includes the entire spectrum of those functions of
combat engineering, airfield engineering, construction engineering, geomatics and fire protection services to achieve
the role of engrs. To delinate a difference between Aengr@ and Aengineering@, we define, the acts of the trained engr
soldiers who apply the science of these five engineering functions. However, it is the tasks which further defines
the type of engineering function which is applied. Regardless of the colour of uniform the engr soldier may wear,
these tasks could be executed by any or all of the environmental component engrs.
1. Mobility support to operations is normally provided by close support engr forces at the tactical level and is
the responsibility of the component engrs. Assistance or more engr resources can be requested from the TFC who
will assign ESU resources or other component resources based upon advice of the TF Engr.
604. COUNTER-MOBILITY
1. The TF Engr is responsible for advising the TFC on the policy for mines, booby traps and other obstacles,
theatre policy for demolitions and theatre denial policy. Counter-mobility policy must be coordinated at the TF level
to ensure that national restrictions are included and to ensure consistent employment in all components. Detailed
division of responsibilities is at Annex B.
1. The TF Engr is responsible for advising the TFC on theatre policy on Camouflage Concealment and [non-
electronic] Deception (CCD), physical protection of assets, engr assistance to NBC defence, EOD/BMD, and
physical security engineering and force protection. The detailed division of responsibilities are described at Annex
B.
2. Physical Security Engineering and Force Protection includes the design and construction of specific
structures, based on a given threat, to improve the physical security of friendly forces. Some examples of specific
structures are cover-from-view screens, anti-mortar screens and access control devices. It does not include field
fortifications. The TF Engr will coordinate physical security engineering tasks with the J3 and
J3 SAMP.
3. The ESU will provide specialist expertise in the complete design cycle from project programming to
preparation of final plans and specifications for physical security engineering. On site guidance and coordination
may continued to be required by personnel from the ESU to assist executing engrs in the construction of any
structure. The TF Engr will coordinate any necessary requirements.
4. Once a physical security engineering project is defined, the ESU will identify a project planning team that
will define the design criteria, select protective measures and estimate costs. Protective measures will take into
account the protective requirements to resist various aggressor tactics, the effects of tools, weapons and explosives.
5. A final concept or project definition may take into consideration the design of electronic security and
surveillance systems depending on the type of structure being designed.
1. The TF Engr is responsible for advising the TFC on theatre policy concerning all aspects of sustainment
engineering. This will include all repair, maintenance and construction of facilities, structures, and LOC routes. The
provision and maintainenance of utilities, water supply, specialized maritime construction, specialized support to
6-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
fixed and rotary wing aircraft, environmental protection, CIMIC tasks, Emergency Response Services (ERS) and Fire
Protection Services (FPS).
2. The component engrs and the ESU will conduct engineering design, and build initial standard construction
in sector. The components will also build temporary standard in sector, with the support of the ESU as required.
The ESU will be the design authority for temporary design standard for those areas common to all components,
such as accommodation, general purpose utilities, electrical generation, etc. The ESU is therefore responsible for
specialist engineering design, engineering study, material testing, and engineering survey expertise for temporary
design standard construction. Additional detail on tasks and responsibilities for construction support to is at Annex
B.
3. Sustainment engineering as it concerns the provision of water supply is a coordinated effort amongst TFHQ
staffs, component engrs and the ESU, medical (Med Gp) and police services (SAMP Unit), and logistics units (Sp
Gp). The TF Engr, in cooperation with the ESU will coordinate the responsibilities of engr sp of technical advice on
water supply issues and equipment, the reconnaissance, construction, operation, storage and field testing and
treatment at source.
4. The medical services are responsible for the complete analysis for potability of any source water and the
advice on the suitability, quality, methods of treatment and the scale of issue of water. Periodic detailed testing and
assurance that water quality is maintained throughout the water supply system is essential. Logistical support
responsibilities include the provision of water carriage equipment, some potable storage tanks and chemicals
required for water treatment and the bulk transportation of water by road. Police services responsibilities include
route signing, traffic control and discipline at water points and when necessary they may also be required to police
sewers and streams to enforce polution control policies.
5. Sustainment Engineering Support for Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft. The air component engr will
be the design authority for the repair and maintenance of facilities and structures specific to the conduct and
impacting on flight operations. The air component will also provide technical expertise in this area to other
components as required. The ESU will provide additional design and engineering assistance as required.
a. Support to Rotary Wing Aircraft. Provision of sustainment engineering support to rotary wing aircraft will
be determined by the command relationship and the physical location of the helicopter unit. If the unit is
under operational command (OPCOM) or operational control (OPCON) of a component, then the component
engr will be responsible for providing support. When a helipad or heliport is located in a component sector,
then the component engr is also responsible to support those facilities. If the component engr lacks
sufficient resources or expertise, then he may request assistance through the command chain to the TF
Engr.
b. In a similar way, support to fixed wing aircraft should be dictated by the command relationship and the
physical location of the fixed wing unit. Fighter aircraft are invariably under the command of the air
component, but it is less clear about transport aircraft:
(1) In an undeveloped theatre there may be an airstrip located in the land component sector for resupply
and to support air-landing operations. The land component engr would support the operation of this
airstrip and the air component would support operations at a main airfield that is under the control of
the air component of the TF; and
(2) In a fully developed theatre there may be an operational airfield that is supporting air combat operations
under control of the air component and a logistics airfield located in the rear area as part of the LOC,
under control of the J4/CSG. The first airfield will be an air component responsibility; while the second
will the responsibility of the ESU because it is controlled operated by the TF. There may be a
requirement for the TFC, on the advice of the TF Engr, to regroup specialist airfield engrs with the ESU
to accomplish this task. Additional detail on tasks and responsibilities for support to fixed and rotary
wing aircraft is at Annex B.
6-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
607. GEOMATICS
1. General. The full spectrum of geomatics (Geo) support is a military engr responsibility in accordance with
B-GG-005-004/AF-000 Canadian Forces Operations. The TF Engr is responsible for assisting the TFC in developing
the Military Engineering Supporting Plan (SUP), of which geomatics support planning is a component. The
Geomatics Support Squadron of Mapping and Charting Establishment (MCE), as a sub-unit of the ESU, will be
responsible to provide the majority of geomatics support to the TFC. However, it is clear that force geomatics
support requirements can only be made available with the assistance of NDHQ/J2 Geomatics, but the resources
deployed will be controlled centrally by the TF Engr.
2. NDHQ/J2 Geomatics and The TF Engr. This relationship is efficient and workable as the close cooperation
of the TFHQ, NDHQ/J2 Geo and the TF Engr, as well as others, is a mutually supportive arrangement that shares
geospatial information, resources and capabilities in aid of the TFC's concept of operations and the pursuit of the
force's mission. Geomatics support, formerly geographic support, remains essential to all operations as a significant
force multiplier. As with operations, this support spans the spectrum of activities, from the strategic to the tactical,
throughout the continuum of operations, from peacetime planning and training to armed conflict.
3. Scope. Geomatics support is essential to the conduct of military operations. Every weapon system,
combat unit, aircraft and ship requires some form of geomatics/geographic support to deploy, navigate, manoeuvre
and fight. Geomatics support includes a responsibility for updating, revising and maintaining geomatics databases.
The scope of support also includes hydrographic, topographic and aeronautical support activities. The cooperation
with the NDHQ/J2 Geo staff, MCE, combat engr units and reconnaissance units is necessary to source, distribute
and confirm information currency.
4. Mutual Support. Within allied defence forces, geomatics support is established as a national responsibility,
notably for the provision of specialist personnel and services designed to exploit geospatial information for defence
and military purposes. Geomatics support will be provided from a combination of national, host nation and allied
sources as coordinated by NDHQ/J2 Geomatics. National support will be provided by "base-plant support" from
MCE and "deployed support" with the in-theatre ESU. A limited terrain analysis capability is located with the 1 Int
Coy (ICAC).
5. Force Employment: Warning and Preparation. Strategic level geomatics support could include the
tasking of national capabilities, government and private sector, expanding to include significant multi-national level
activities. In the first instance it might be limited to the sourcing of products and services from national sources,
to increased burden sharing and co-production activities with allies (thereby addressing the demand for access to
global geospatial data for Canadian interests) and / or to increased tasking within DND/CF to the Mapping and
Charting Establishment (MCE) for special purpose defence products and services not available from national
mappers and charters nor available from host or foreign nations.
6. Task Force Planning: Deployment Phase . Operational level geomatics support notably the provision of
digital data at 1:250 000 scale, is increasingly seen as the foundation element of highly standardized and integrated
command, control, information, weapons and navigation systems. Operational level TFHQ requirements drive
priorities to manage and maintain databases and the tempo of conflict response necessitates interoperability and
co-production amongst defence partners. Indeed, coalition response to crises is becoming the norm. Interoperable
systems, configuration managed, are critical to effective force deployments and operations.
7. Employment Decision Making: Battle Procedure. At the tactical level, a joint (task) force, geomatics
support requirements, at 1:50 000 scale and larger, could lead to the deployment of a Geomatics Support Squadron
from MCE as part of the ESU. Although the size of the organization would be tailored to the specific operation, it
is possible that it would be on the order of 45 - 50 personnel. It is trained and equipped to provide survey point
positioning support (including targeting), geospatial database access and maintenance, the generation of map and
chart plots, product storage and distribution, terrain analysis and visualization, specialist liaison and coordination
support and command and control of geomatics resources. It should be recalled that there would be supporting links
to host nations, to allies in theatre and to national and allied assets outside of the theatre of operations. It should
be noted that field deployed geomatics support assists in the maritime and aviation battles, as well as in the land
6-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
battle. This is particularly applicable to terrain / battle space analysis and point positioning (including targeting)
support. There are increased linkages between digital hydrographic data and mine-countermine warfare, ocean bed
monitoring and route charting activities.
8. Geospatial Information. The CF=s integral capabilities are not adequate to meet all TFHQ geomatics
requirements. NDHQ/J2 Geomatics relies upon its partnerships and exchange with national and allied agencies to
meet the full range of the TFC and TF Engr geomatics support requirements. The acquisition of geomatics
information, products, and materials are arranged by NDHQ/J2 Geomatics through:
a. international bilateral Memoranda of Agreement (Exchange or Understanding) for the exchange of geomatic
materials with allies (NATO / CANUS / ABCA);
b. national Memoranda of Agreement / Understanding with other federal government departments (OGDs) for
the acquisition of domestic products;
e. tasking MCE.
9. Geomatics Products. The paper products created and/or distributed by MCE are listed in the various DND
map and chart catalogues. Products are available in accordance with CFAO 36-17 and are listed in:
b. Supporting the Air component - GPH 208 CF Catalogue "Aeronautical Charts and Flight Information
Publications"; and
c. Hydrographic Service Operator's Items 835 to 838 (inclusive) "Catalogue of Nautical Charts and Related
Publications", Volumes 1-4.
10. Digital Data. In addition to hard copy paper maps and charts and other designated products as already
noted, geomatics products include digital or electronic data such as those listed below :
11. Geomatics Services. Based on the mission assigned to the TFC and TFHQ requirements, deployed
geomatics services from MCE can be provided using independent teams, detached sections, a formed troop or a
sub-unit, all with their own specialist equipment. Tailored to the mission, and assigned under command, deployed
geomatics support services available to the TF HQ include:
6-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
12. Standardization and Standards. Increased CF involvement in joint and combined operations has created
increased attention to interoperability (and standardization) issues. The CF has already adopted a global focus for
regional threats, versus a regional focus for a global threat. This has driven increased attention to sharing amongst
allies to create, through various gateways accessing several linked data warehouses, a virtual global geospatial
information database and the shared preparation of standards and standardization and exchange agreements, both
national and international. There are numerous geomatics standardization NATO agreements (STANAGs), ABCA
agreements (QSTAGS) and exchange agreements that deal exclusively with geospatial information production and
the provision of geomatics support services.
6-7/6-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex A to
Chapter 6
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
1. Construction standards specify the types of material and construction techniques used in constructing
facilities in support of contingency operations. Contingency construction standards provide criteria that minimize
engr effort while providing facilities of a quality consistent with the mission requirements, personnel health and
safety, and the expected availability of construction resources. Where mission requirements are similar, facilities
are constructed to the same standards by all Environments.
2. Initial Standard:
b. Intended for immediate austere operational use by units upon arrival in theatre for limited time ranging up to
six months (depending on the specific facility); and
c. May require replacement by more substantial or durable facilities during the course of operations.
3. Temporary Standard:
d. Replaces initial standard in some cases where mission requirements dictate. Temporary standard
construction can be used from the start of an operation when it is judged to be as cost effective or more
operationally effective.
4. Other Construction. Construction beyond temporary standard is a special case and guidance will be issued
by NDHQ.
6A-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
7 POL Storage and Bladders and vehicles. Bladders and steel tanks with
Distribution limited piping systems in
logistics areas.
6A-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
Engr Recce Conduct tactical level Same Same Conduct operational level
engr recce. engr recce.
Liaison with Liaison as authorized Same Same Force level national POC
allied engrs in Operation Order. with allied engrs.
Engr Reports and Advise TF Engr of Same Same Advise NDHQ/J3 Engr of
Returns status of engr units and status of engr units and
essential equipment essential equipment through
through a system of a system of routine reports
routine reports and and returns.
returns.
Decide what engr reports and
Emergency situations returns are required and
to be handled on the include them in the
operations (J3) net. operation order.
2. MAINTAIN MOBILITY
Bridging nil Plan, construct and nil Plan and coordinate the
maintain all assault and provision, construction and
support bridging in maintenance of LOC
theatre. bridging in the theatre.
6B-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
Airfield Damage nil Conduct Repair of Conduct all ADR in Specialist engineering
Repair Airfield Operating theatre . support and EOD support to
Surfaces (RAOS) in the ADR as required.
land component sector.
3. COUNTER-MOBILITY
Area Denial Conduct limited Plan, supervise and Plan, supervise and Same as Maritime
explosive and non- conduct all major conduct all denial component.
explosive denial denial operations in operations in sector in
operations in theatre in accordance accordance with TFC Advise the TFC on theatre
accordance with with TFC policy. policy. denial policy.
theatre policy.
4. ENHANCE SURVIVABILITY
6B-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
5. SUSTAINMENT ENGINEERING
Vertical Construction
6B-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
Power Supply /
Distribution
Specialized Jetty Design authority Provide combat diving nil Design and engineering
and Marine for the repair and support to the maritime assistance for the
Infrastructure maintenance of jetty component as required construction, maintenance
and marine structures and repair of infrastructure
specific to the conduct specific to the conduct of
of maritime maritime operations.
operations.
Specialized nil nil Design Authority for the Design and engineering
Airfield repair and maintenance assistance for the
Infrastructure. of infrastructure specific construction, maintenance
to the conduct of flight and repair of infrastructure
operations. specific to the conduct of
flight operations.
Provide technical
expertise and
construction assistance
to other components as
required.
Prisoner of War/ Design and build POW Same Same Design POW camps and
Refugee camps cages. refugee camps.
6B-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
Supervise construction of
camps using uniformed or
non-uniformed work force.
Horizontal Construction
MSR n/a Work on sector MSRs as n/a Coordinatie all Force level
Maintenance directed in opO MSRs in theatre.
Construction and nil Initial layout, Maintenance of support Design and engineering
maintenance of construction and airstrips under the assistance to the construction
airstrips maintenance of battle control of the air of airstrips.
and forward airstrips. component.
Note: need definition of
Design authority for different types or airstrips/
airstrip standards. airfields. (i.e. battle, forward,
support, FOL, MOB, etc.)
Combat Diving nil Provision of all combat nil Coordination of all combat
support diving support in diving in theatre.
theatre.
ESU to provide TF diving
support as required.
6B-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
Other
Material Testing
Real Property Coordinate and submit Same Same Provide Real property
Management of component management and liaison
requirements to TFHQ. with HN including:
-Determining requirements;
Assist TF Engr in -Selecting properties;
selection of properties. -Acquiring property;
-Disposing of property;
Conduct Real Property -Processing claims;
Management activities -Maintaining accurate
as delegated. property records.
Emergency Conduct of ERS for all Same Same Advise the TFC on ERS
Response incidents in sector, policy and coordinate all
Services (ERS) including ERS in theatre.
establishment of ERS
equipment, plans and The ESU will conduct ERS in
training for: initial and sector and provide assistance
temporary camps; to the components as
rescue and aircraft required.
incidents; hazardous
material incidents,
hazardous procedures
standby; and structural
fires.
6B-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
6. GEOMATICS
Geomatics Coordinate requests for Provision of TERA and Coordinate requests for Advise the TFC, directly and
Support to Geo support for the advice on the impact of geomatics support for through detachments to the
Operations component as terrain on operations to the component as J2, on the effect of terrain on
required. the commander of the required. operations.
(Maritime component land component. (Air component will
will normally receive normally receive Geo Conduct liaison with allies in
Geo support direct direct from the strategic theatre for the provision of
from the strategic level.) Geo support.
level.)
Act as the conduit for
passage of Geo products to
the components as required.
Coordination of Detailed coordination Same Same Force level POC with HNS
engr support for execution of engr authorities.
portion of HNS. contracts.
Draft/ coordinate engr portion
Authority for of HNS umbrella agreement.
contracting, where it TF Engr acts as the engr
only concerns one technical authority for the
component, may be agreement.
delegated to
component engrs in Monitor and coordinate the
operation order. allocation of key HNS engr
resources.
6B-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
Annex B to
Chapter 6
Coordination and Control the allocation Same Same Monitor and coordinate the
assistance in the of engr resources control of key resources
procurement of within the component. through TFHQ/J3 .
specialized engr
stores and Coordinate with Coordinate with CSG and J4
defensive stores component logistics for procurement of engr
(Class IV) staff for procurement of stores.
engr stores.
8. ENVIRONMENT
6B-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 7
701. GENERAL
1. Logistics Support for the ESU. The ESU has integral first line administrative and logistics support. It
receives second line support from the CSG.
2. Logistics Support for Military Engr Tasks. Much of the material required for the completion of engr tasks
(such as POL, vehicles, explosives, tools, etc) will be obtained through normal supply channels. This chapter
outlines the procedures to be followed when engr material and resources are not available through the logistics
system, and intimate military engr involvement is required in the procurement, contracting, delivery or disposal of
material and resources for engr tasks. This may be due to the specialized nature, quality control requirements, bulk,
or delivery arrangements. In all cases, the most effective method must be used.
1. Coordination in the TFHQ. Military engr operations require a large variety of resources ranging from basic
construction materials to consultant services and labour. The procurement and control of these resources will be
critical to the completion of the engr mission. The TF Engr Cell staff will coordinate procurement policy for engr
resources with the J4 staff. Direct liaison between ESU and CSG staff will enhance the level of coordination required
for actual procurement and delivery of engr material and resources.
2. Procurement Procedure. The following procedures should be used when planning the procurement of
Construction and Field Defence stores (Class IV):
a. Material and resource estimates are produced in accordance with the Military Engr SUP. Construction and
Field Defence Stores are particularly difficult to plan for because they are often heavy, bulky and sometimes
cannot be purchased in theatre. Special procurement action may be necessary during the Warning phase
for long-lead or difficult to obtain materials;
b. The TF Engr Cell determines, in consultation with J4, which items can be obtained from existing stocks or
from existing sources of supply. The requirement for military engr quality control can also be determined
at this stage. Close liaison with logistics staff must be maintained to ensure that appropriate engr input
throughout the procurement process is provided;
c. Delivery of the items is coordinated with J4 Mov, either from Canada, or from in-theatre sources; and
d. If material and resources cannot be obtained from the supply system, or not delivered to meet operational
requirements, contract authority is delegated to the ESU, or component engrs as appropriate, for local
procurement of material and resources.
3. Controlled Stores. Depending on the nature of the operation, specific types of engr and defence stores may
be designated as operationally controlled by the J3. The monitoring of these controlled stores is normally delegated
to the TF Engr Cell. Controlled stores may include generators, water purification equipment, sandbags, mines,
explosives etc.
4. Delivery of Construction and Field Defence Stores. Military engr involvement at all points along the
chain of delivery may be necessary in some situations. Engrs at airheads, ship off-loading points and distribution
centres may be required to ensure that material bound for delivery in theatre is properly loaded and changes can
be made as in-theatre priorities change. Engr presence at the J4 Movement Coordination Centre (MCC) will assist
in proper routing and delivery of procured engr materials and also provide coordination of the engr work effort in
support of LOCs.
7-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. Coordination in the TFHQ. The coordination of financial management of the TF operations ultimately rests
with the J4 Fin Coord. Financial management of the construction and maintenance portion of the TF budget will be
coordinated and executed by the ESU as directed by the TF Engr.
2. Delegation of Spending Authority. Authority to expend funds should be delegated to the lowest practical
level to facilitate and expedite judicious use of fiscal resources by commanders. Monitoring of fiscal expenditures
must be maintained at the highest practical level to ensure overall cost control of military engr tasks.
3. Cost Recovery. Financial Management of engr activity within the TF area of operations will be complicated
by the presence of different component forces, allied nations and the HN, combined with a potentially wide variety
of funding sources. Therefore, project expenditures must be recorded to facilitate future cost-recovery. Costs of such
non-cash activity as military labour and contributed material should also be maintained, as well as separate records
of work contributed by the HN to ensure the recovery actions reflect the true cost to the Canadian TF. This becomes
especially important if the constructed assets and infrastructure are to remain in the HN, or handed over to another
participant in a combined operation. The ESU will record these expenditures for submission to the TF Engr Cell.
The TF Engr Cell will then support J4 Fin cost recovery actions as required.
1. Military Personnel. The administration of Canadian military engr personnel will be conducted in accordance
with B-GG-005-004/AF-013 - Logistics Doctrine for CF Operations and HQDP 101 - Personnel Support to
Operations.
2. Civilian Personnel. Military engrs in the TF may draw from three groups of civilian personnel to provide
specialized technical or labour force manpower. Further details on the administration of civilians in the TF is
included in B-GG-005-004/AF-013 - Logistics Doctrine for CF Operations. In broad terms these groups can be
identified as follows:
a. Canadian citizens working for the Canadian Government or industry. Their administration will be governed
by the standards established in the National Joint Council Agreements and by the provisions of their
engagements for the purpose of in theatre support as determined by the J5 staff;
b. Host Nation citizens contributing to the operational labour res ource pool as part of a previously arranged HNS
agreement. The coordination of support from the HN civilian labour pool will involve J5 staff. Direct engr input
will be required to define the qualifications of the personnel required and then assess possible candidates.
If the operational planning process identifies the need for significant engr manpower needs from HN, it is
critical that engr staff be involved in the screening and selection of those individuals; and
1. Types of Host Nation Support (HNS). Host Nation Support consists if the civil or military assistance
rendered by a nation to foreign forces within its territory in peace or in war as part of a negotiated HNS agreement.
HNS is generally grouped into the following areas:
a. civil labour;
b. transport services;
7-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
2. HNS Planning Considerations. The level of HNS available to the operation should be determined prior to
deployment. The quality and availability of engr HNS should also be assessed to determine the size of the engr
effort required in the TF. For example, HNS assets may not be available to work in high threat areas or with
sophisticated equipment. The TF Engr staff will advise the J4 and J5 staffs on the preparation of HNS agreements
as they relate to military engineering.
3. Provision of HNS. HNS is normally obtained through agreements negotiated with a host nation to support
exercises during peace and to prepare for and provide support in times of crisis or armed conflict. HNS is
coordinated by the J5 with input by J4 and TF Engr. As part of these agreements, military engrs may also be called
upon to provide assistance to the HN. For operations in countries where there are no HNS plans or other formal
agreements for the procurement of support, ad hoc arrangements for civilian contractor support are established.
1. Civilian contract support includes all contract support not included as part of existing HNS agreements. It
may be obtained from Canadian sources, other nations or in the theatre of operations. The contract support which
will be required may include specialist engr consulting services, technical translation, material and equipment
procurement, and supply of engr related services.
2. Civilian contract support from Canada will conform to the existing process in place between DND and Public
Works and Government Services or Defence Construction Canada. Depending on the level of urgency the specific
rules and regulations of the tendering process may be altered to allow faster response times. Approval from
NDHQ/J3 Engr will be requested through the TF Engr Cell.
3. In theatre civilian contract support will be guided by the policies established by the J4. The CSG will be
responsible for the procurement of most services although, as outlined above, military engrs may be given the
authority to contract for certain goods and services directly.
4. Direct engr liaison with civilian contractors is essential throughout the contracting process to ensure that the
engr requirement is met. The ESU will be responsible to establish specification standards for the TF Engr and will
maintain a library of contracts issued the related specifications for reference by engrs in the theatre of operations.
7-3/7-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 8
SECTION I
DOMESTIC OPERATIONS
801. INTRODUCTION
1. Domestic operations are operations to aid maintenance of public order and security, emergency relief and
the pursuit of national development goals through the provision of armed or unarmed assistance to civil authorities.
In domestic operations, the CF complement and supplement civil authorities until such time as the civil authorities
are able to resume full responsibility for existing situations. Background information for Domestic operations is found
in chapter 13 of B-GG-005-004/AF-000 Canadian Forces Operations.
2. The following terms are used in defining and describing the conduct of domestic operations:
a. Public Order Emergency. An emergency that arises from threats to the security of Canada and that is
so serious as to be a national emergency;
b. Public Welfare Emergency. An emergency that is caused by a real or imminent situation or incident and
that results or may result in a danger to life or property, social disruption or a breakdown in the flow of
essential goods, services or resources, so serious as to be a national emergency. Situations that may
result in a public welfare emergency are:
c. Public Welfare Project. A planned undertaking at the local, provincial or national level which is in the
public interest and which is meant to further the quality of life or otherwise benefit private individuals or groups
of individuals.
1. Domestic operations are conducted as aid of the civil power or assistance to civil authority.
2. Aid of the Civil Power. Aid of the civil power is conducted in accordance with the National Defence Act
and in response to a written requisition from an attorney general or equivalent. Details of engr involvement in aid to
the civil power are in B-GL-302-008 Series, Aid of the Civil Power.
2. Assistance to Civil Authority. Assistance to civil authority operations are conducted in response to
requests for assistance to civil (non-defence) agencies and individuals, public welfare emergencies, request for
armed assistance to other government departments (OGDs), and requests for armed assistance to the Correctional
Services of Canada (CSC). Detailed procedures are outlined in DNDP 55 Provision of Services to Non-Defence
Agencies.
3. On receipt of a requisition for assistance, or when the MND approves the use of CF resources, the CDS
established an appropriate force, generally a TF, and directs operations to provide the requested assistance. HQDP
200 Canadian Forces Plan for Domestic Operations describes CF policy and outlines the procedures to be followed.
8-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. The CF will normally be regarded as a force of last resort. Similarly, the CF will normally be withdrawn from
a domestic operation as soon as possible after the situation can again be controlled by the civil authority using its
own resources. The CF responds to aid of the civil power or assistance to civil authority operations with residual
capabilities that result from the maintenance of a multi-purpose combat capability. Protracted or wide-spread
operations may require reserve augmentation.
2. Support to OGDs, especially the provision of unarmed assistance, will not normally require specialized
training. Humanitarian assistance inside Canada and most national development projects will normally rely on the
skills possessed as a result of general military training or trade skills already possessed by CF personnel. Some
unique training may be conducted for operations agreed to under memoranda of understanding with OGDs.
1. Military engr doctrine, in general, can be applied to domestic operations. In domestic operations, operational
level military engr support is provided by the ESU, or by existing CF bases augmented, as required, by national
capabilities.
2. For domestic operations, a supporting base is designated by the CDS so resources may be assembled and
support activities planned.
3. Incremental costs for support provided under MOUs during certain domestic operations may be recoverable.
In these cases, the J3 Engr staff must identify, record and report all resources expended in support of the
operations.
1. C2 arrangements for domestic operations must be specified by the CDS and will depend on the location and
nature of the operation. Either on receipt of a written requisition from a provincial attorney general, or when directed
by the MND or Governor in Council to provide assistance to civil authority, or when a request for assistance for which
authority has been delegated has been approved, the CDS will designate an appropriate commander, most probably
one of the operational level commanders. While it is likely that the CDS will designate the applicable LFA
Commander (or Commander CFNA) as his on-site commander, he may use another commander as the situation
dictates.
2. The ECS retain, as a primary role, the responsibility for force generation, and operational commanders are
doubled-hatted as subordinate commanders in this role. Operational commanders are responsible directly to the
CDS for the conduct of domestic operations, and to their respective ECS for force generation. These two roles, while
mutually supporting, are separate and distinct.
3. Success of domestic operations is assisted by effective liaison and coordination among all involved forces,
agencies and organizations at the national and operational levels. Liaison links and joint planning and operations
cells with provincial governments, OGDs and other civil authorities should be established and maintained as a matter
of course. For a domestic operation, the operational commander uses existing liaison links and establishes
additional links, if required.
1. As with any military engr planning to support any operation, early engr assessment of tasks and prioritization
of effort is critical in preventing delays and confusion.
2. The augmentation of military engr resources and capabilities to an existing civilian counterpart may seem
to be dwarfed by comparison. The advantage that military engr support brings to the operation is a rapid response,
an established C2 structure and the ability to work under extreme conditions. Civilian authorities on the other hand
8-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
cannot compare with these capabilities and hence might perceive this action as a substitute to their useful
employment. Cooperation then becomes an important asset in domestic operations.
3. The employment of military engrs should focus towards leveraging public works, municipal and private
construction resources. This can be achieved by opening routes, construction of bypasses, assistance in
contracting, damage assessment and crisis planning. Provision of specialist engr equipment such as water
purification, armoured engr vehicles, night vision operating devices and large portable power generators.
4. The consumption costs of large quantities of engr materials and resources in support of a domestic operation
can be significant. Maintenance of accurate records for the purpose of financial reimbursement is an absolute
necessity.
5. As described in Chapter 4, environmental impact considerations are particularly important during domestic
operations. A complete knowledge of environmental legislation and any possible resulting effects on military engr
operations will be coordinated by the NDHQ/J3 Engr and implemented and controlled by the TF Engr.
6. Military engr tasks and the use of engr heavy equipment has an inherent "attractability" of the public and
media at large. Consideration for the control and safety of civilian personnel and media cameras around these
operations usually become imperative. A well coordinated plan is the responsibility of the TF Engr and TFHQ staff
principals such as J5 CIMIC, J4 LOG and the SAMP unit.
8-3/8-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
807. INTRODUCTION
1. The UN has traditionally been the focus of peace support operations. The CF will continue to participate and
dedicate forces to such operations. The guiding principle for the conduct of peace support operations is adaptability.
2. Categories of Peace Support Operations. The CF has adopted the division of peace support operations
presented in the 1992 UN Secretary-General report titled An Agenda for Peace: Preventative Diplomacy,
Peacemaking and Peacekeeping. The main divisions are as follows:
a. Preventive Diplomacy is action taken to prevent disputes arising between parties, to prevent existing
disputes from escalating into conflicts, and to limit the spread of the latter when they occur;
b. Peacemaking is the process of securing resolutions to disputes that could lead to conflict, primarily through
diplomacy, mediation, negotiation, or other forms of peaceful settlement;
c. Peacekeeping is the prevention, containment, moderation and termination of hostilities between or within
states, through the medium of an impartial third party intervention organized and directed internationally,
using military forces, police and civilians, usually conducted with the consent of the principal belligerent
parties, in order to restore and maintain peace;
d. Peace Enforcement involves military operations to restore peace or to establish specified condition in an
area of conflict or tension where the parties may not consent to intervention and may be engaged in combat
activities; and
e. Peacebuilding comprises post-conflict actions in the aftermath of international war or civil strife to
strengthen and solidify peace to avoid a relapse into conflict. Military engr involvement could include such
activities as restoration of infrastructure, training of military forces, and demining.
3. Elements of the CF may also be involved in Humanitarian Assistance Operations which may be conducted
independent, or as a component, of a peace support operation. These operations may involve such activities as
providing security for convoys under the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) or provision of water
or repair of infrastructure. (For further detail, see Section 3 on Civil-Military Cooperation).
1. Although C2 arrangements may vary from operation to operation, several characteristics are essential to an
effective C2 authority:
a. legal status;
b. command relationships;
d. liaison;
e. CIS; and
2. United Nations Operations. The great majority of peace support operations will be part of a UN sponsored
operation. Their multi-national character, by nature, creates difficult and at times competing national policies,
8-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
priorities, doctrine, effort and efficiency. The UN sponsored operation normally employs a force under a single
commander. The UN FC's chain of command and an explanation of his reporting procedures are completely
described in B-GG-005-004/AF-000 CF Operations.
3. Arrangements and responsibilities for support such as military engineering, logistical and financial can be
complicated issues. These are normally negotiated at the time of force formation that generally reflect capabilities
and proportionality. Simplicity is an important consideration in all peace support operations.
4. Non-United Nations Operations. The principles and guidelines for the CF's involvement in peace support
operations relate primarily to operations mandated by the UN. However, when other organizations play a role in
conflict resolution, these principles and guidelines apply equally to activities based on a mandate from any of these
organizations. Most of the non-UN operations are based upon principles developed for UN operations, therefore in
most cases there will only be slight variations from UN procedures.
5. Liaison. While all six characteristics of effective C2 are essential, effective liaison officers (LOs) are an
invaluable asset. The deployment of LOs with the belligerents, if permitted, and other UN agencies (e.g. UNHCR)
will provide the capability to relay information quickly and to anticipate and control potential confrontational
situations. This early warning can be critical due to the dispersed nature of UN operations and the varied security
situation.
2. UN Technical Reconnaissance. If there is to be a large military engr involvement, or there is a severe lack
of infrastructure, it is essential that military engrs are in the technical recce party. This recce, coordinated by
NDHQ/J3 Engr, is prior to, and distinct from, the national recce which should also include military engrs.
3. Once Canadian participation in the operation is approved, the DCDS (or the TFC) will:
a. with UNNY approval, plan and conduct a ground recce in the theatre of operations. Depending on the degree
of military engr involvement, again, it is essential that appropriate representatives be included in the ground
recce; and
b. develop and issue a Military Engr SUP or annex to the operations order.
1. Although operational control of troops is generally delegated to an officer holding the UN appointment of
Force Commander, Canada retains certain responsibilities for the TF elements, as described in B-GG-005-004/AF-
000 CF Operations.
2. In general terms, the CF TFHQ, in its role as a National Command Element (NCE) is not capable of planning,
organizing and conducting operations. Rather it is responsible for matters of a purely national nature such as pay
and allowances; Canadian-specific supply matters; national communications etc. These are coordinated by the
TFHQ through a composite support unit, known as the National Support Element (NSE) which may include military
engrs from the ESU as well as elements of the CSG, Med Gp, CIS Unit and MPU.
1. The degree and scope of national support provided to a TF on peacekeeping operations will vary depending
on agreements reached with NDHQ and the UN. As a rule, if the operation is under its jurisdiction, the UN is
8-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
responsible for providing military engr support , including infrastructure construction and maintenance. National
responsibilities primarily concerned with the maintenance of Canadian standards and the support of unique Canadian
requirements.
2. Generally, national support to meet peacekeeping operational requirements is only provided following receipt
of a formal request from the UN, or in accordance with a formal standing agreement. Ongoing national support is
provided for personnel administration, financial services, medical and dental services, and maintenance of nationally
owned equipment. The cost of any support provided from national sources which is not routed through, and approved
by, the UN will normally be borne by Canada.
3. In UN operations, national elements are expected to be self-sufficient for the first 60-120 days to allow
establishment of the UN support system. This is also the time when most infrastructure is required to be
established for the TF. As part of the planning process, the TF Engr must establish when UN support will be
provided. There must also be strict recording of expenditures, to facilitate appropriate cost recovery from the UN.
1. The UN Operational Support Manual includes military engr support as an integral part of the conduct of
operations. Its reference to "General Engineer Support", is not to be confused with what is considered one of the
organizational principles of employment of general support. It must be understood that there is no fixed
organizational blueprint to conduct peace support operations under the mandate of the UN, and that the military
chain of command generally reports to a civilian chain of command. Close coordination and cooperation is essential.
The potentially complex organization for a basic peace support operation as exampled in Figure 8-1.
8-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
2. UN missions take place worldwide, in areas with different climates, different levels of existing national
infrastructure and varying availability of the resources required to create acceptable working and living conditions.
Each mission will have varying amounts of Force level engr capability, and national contingents within a mission
will bring with them varying engr capabilities. For the efficient, effective functioning of UN missions, adequate
working and living accommodations must be available. It is equally important that strict controls be exercised on
accommodation expenditures to best utilize the scarce resources efficiently and effectively. A balance between
economy and comfort is best achieved through an application of sound engineering and management principles.
3. The aim of the "General Engineer Support" chapter of the UN manual is to describe the UN general engr
support functions and procedures. The objectives of general engr support services are to design, construct and
maintain works and buildings, operate utility plants and provide fire protection, together with other related services,
in support of the operational commitments of UN field missions. General engr support services are provided in
addition to "field" engr services such as mine clearance which may be required in certain missions.
4. The chapter has been designed to facilitate both mission planners and those executing general engr support
to missions in progress. It is structured to permit staff of newly organized missions to create their own Standing
Operating Procedures (SOPs) using this chapter as a guideline. The scope and structure of the chapter contains
the following :
a. SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
8-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
h. SECTION 8 - INFRASTRUCTURE
5. The structure mirrors the military engr planning guidance of any operation. Since military engr support to
UN missions normally differ from more traditional types of military operations, engrs must be prepared to execute
tasks from the full range of engr functions. They may include constraints such as rapid deployment, austere living
conditions, lack of appropriate maps, destroyed infrastructure, extended lines of communications, multiple air and
seaport development, extensive countermine and force protection operations, lack of construction materials, and
civic action requirements. Engr support concepts should be guided by the following principles:
6. The following areas are integral to ensuring appropriate engr support to the mission:
a. engr recce;
7. Engr Reconnaissance. A complete and thorough engr recce forms the basis for effective and efficient engr
support. Of primary importance in the initial engr recce are:
a. the nature of the country, to include its geography, history, and demography. Additionally the political and
economic climate play an important role in developing achievable engr end-state options;
b. the laws, customs and agreements of the country. This includes contracting conditions, real estate
procedures, environmental laws, cultural impacts on construction, HN agreements, and international
agreements;
c. the engineering environment to include climate and weather, terrain and topography, soils and geology,
elevation, vegetation, land use, hydrography, natural resources, and type, nature and amount of available
construction materials; and
8-9
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
d. the level and status of infrastructure to include aerial and seaports of debarkation, in-country transportation,
and utilities (electrical power, water distribution systems, sanitation facilities, pipelines, and
communications).
8. Establishing the Engineering Objective. Engineering objectives are derived from the overall objectives
of the UN FC. Options are developed for achieving both specified and implied tasks. These options identify the
essential missions to be executed, the engr effort required, construction materials needed, the proposed
construction standard, the estimated time required to execute the option, and any special considerations.
9. Tailoring the Force. The engr force is tailored to execute the identified missions. Planners consider all
available engr capabilities. Engr capabilities vary depending on the type of unit and country of origin. Planners must
consider the specific capability and availability of the units when building the force, and must understand the
capabilities of member states' engr organizations. For example, many member states separate combat and
construction engr skills, others do not. This helps the planner request the appropriate type of engr units and
eliminate unnecessary redundancy. Interoperability must be considered to ensure that assets are complementary,
if not compatible. Engr planners must also consider assets available through contracts, the HN, and private
agencies.
10. Obtaining Construction Material. Engr operations normally require large amounts of construction
materials. Engrs identify, prioritize, and requisition, through supply channels, required construction material. Engrs
have to be involved in the purchasing process. Construction materials, not available in country, should be
requisitioned and delivered in small quantities as forces arrive in theatre. Follow-on transportation should include
limited and frequent loads of construction materials. This avoids the problem with large bulk taking up transportation
space, allows a steady flow into the theatre and precludes storage and security problems. For efficient mission
support, a rational, steady flow of necessary construction materials is very important.
11. Force protection, force beddown and construction and/or repair of LOCs all require large quantities of
construction materials. By the very nature of the mission, this commodity is critical to mission success and often
needed at the outset of the mission. The senior engr planning cell must estimate requirements for theatre
development and for a sustainment flow. Additionally, the planning cell must determine what materials are available
from local sources. The materials may be from local manufacturers, commercial stockpiles, or HN government
assets. These requirements are then passed to the senior logistic planner to integrate the requisition and
transportation requirements into theatre. Force protection requires large quantities of concertina and barbed wire,
pickets and timbers; force beddown requires construction lumber and nails; LOC repair and construction requires
concrete, asphalt, aggregate and dust palliatives.
12. Supply organizations process the requisition, receive, store, and transport construction materials. Engrs
track the status of construction materials, to keep pace with the operation. Long procurement times may not be
acceptable to mission needs, therefore construction materials procurement may take on extraordinary procedures
such as local purchase or contracting in proximity to the theatre. This decision on sourcing will be made in
coordination with the CAO and supply channels, taking into consideration UN FC objectives and timing.
1. The force engr organization within a United Nations peace support operation is more appropriately described
as the Engineering Management Cell (EMC). The cell is assigned to the UN FC's staff within the office of the Chief
Engineer Officer (Figure 8-2).
8-10
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
2. The EMC is the engineering staff within the UN FC's HQ. As part of the HQ staff, the EMC provides theatre
policy, oversight, resource advocacy (finance and material), project approval and the scope for engineering
operations. EMC activities include developing recommendations and preparing decision packages by continuously
assessing the current situation and coordinating recommended solutions to satisfy the UN FC's mission objectives.
3. Within the force organization, as shown at Figure 8-3, the coordination, project requests and taskings work
flow of a operation is all coordinated through the EMC. For National contingents or others, in accordance with Force
policies, any project requests must be submitted through the EMC for approval.
8-11
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. The UN has no integral geomatics support capability. Products and services must be obtained through HNS,
contributing states or third parties. The UN is responsible only for the following geomatics support to missions:
b. determination of the scales and coverage of mapping required by the mission. (This will often be based
simply on what is available and from what sources);
c. determination of the quantities of each product type required. (This is most often based on a standard
distribution of a certain number of a given product type to each national contingent);
d. obtaining the required products/services from available sources (Host Nation in accordance with agreements,
Defence Mapping Agency (United States Armed Forces), contributing states in accordance with agreements,
states which have agreed to contribute geographic support products as their contribution to the mission);
8-12
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
2. Specific responsibility within a CF TF is the provision of products and services in accordance with the level
of force support as directed by NDHQ/J3 Engr and coordinated with J2 Geomatics and MCE.
1. The Chief Engineer Officer is responsible for fire protection services in a UN mission. He is assisted by a
Force Fire Marshall who should be a fire services professional. Within a CF TF, the TF Engr will be responsible
to appoint a Fire Services Officer/TF Fire Chief from within his organization. He will report to the TF Engr who will
coordinate all aspects of fire protection and engineering within the TF.
8-13
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION III
816. INTRODUCTION
1. CIMIC refers to all actions and measures undertaken by a military commander which concern the
relationships between a military force and the government, civil agencies or civilian population in the areas where
the military force is stationed or employed. CIMIC can be a critical "force multiplier" in the achievement of military
objectives, when in a CF operation, CIMIC involves activities conducted to support the relationship between a TF and
a host country's civil authorities and population, conducted to control hostile actions of a population that are
disrupting operations or when an areas contains those services, supplies or labour that are needed to support the
operation.
2. CIMIC operations are directed at the strategic level, coordinated and managed at the operational level and
conducted at the tactical level. CIMIC, which may be established prior to, during or subsequent to military actions,
is intended to enhance military effectiveness and to promote the legitimacy of military operations. As a result, CIMIC
is part of the operational planning process and is coordinated by the TFHQ staff principals. J5 CIMIC is the advisor
to the TFC on all CIMIC matters.
1. CF CIMIC is divided into two categories: civil-military operations (CMO) and support to civil administration.
CMO are conducted to support the TFC's mission and Canadian national policy. Support to civil administration is
assistance to stabilize a foreign government. Such support results from the direct military involvement in executive,
legislative or judicial areas of civilian government. A complete description of CIMIC operations is discussed in B-GG-
005-004/AF-000 CF Operations . A further break-down of the various types of CIMIC operations is depicted in Figure
8-4.
8-14
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. The CDS, assisted by the NDHQ J5 staff (J5 PA, J5 Policy (Pol), J5 Legal) and J3, is responsible for
establishing broad CIMIC policies based on national strategic objectives. CIMIC aspects of a CF operation will affect
several divisions of the TFHQ (e.g. J1, J3, J4, and J5 divisions). The detailed cooperative arrangements for CIMIC,
however are the responsibilities of the J5 division. The TF Engr should have extensive advice and support towards
the planning of CIMIC operations. The TF Engr cell must assume a proactive involvement with regards to supporting
CIMIC operations planning. Engineering aspects of support is a vehicle to "winning the hearts and minds" of the civil
authority and population. Thus allocation of engr resources should not be an afterthought. The restoration of
utilities, the re-establishing of infrastructure and the provision engineering advice and assistance is a means to the
military objective.
2. To obtain the cooperation of the civilian population, CIMIC operations integrates two other aspects: public
affairs (PA) and psychological operations (PSYOPS).
3. Public Affairs (PA). PA is made up of the actions required to establish a public understanding of the
military force policies and actions in support of national and/or coalition direction by providing timely and accurate
information to national and international media and other target audiences. PA are comprised of five functions:
a. PA planning;
c. PA advice;
4. Psychological Operations (PSYOPS). PSYOPS supports CIMIC through political, military and economic
actions planned and conducted to mould the opinions, attitudes and behaviours of foreign groups to support
Canadian national objectives. The J3 division supervises PSYOPS but the J5 division is responsible for the
coordination of all related actions and activities. PSYOPS is further discussed in CF Operations.
1. Under international law, Canadian commanders have certain obligations to the government, civilians and
economics of the country in which an operation is conducted, regardless of the circumstances under which CF TFs
are employed. For this reason, Canadian commanders may be required to provide humanitarian assistance to local
civil authorities. Humanitarian assistance is but one type of a CMO as shown at Figure 8-4. Humanitarian
assistance are short range programmes aimed at alleviating undue suffering. The variety of programmes to reduce
human pain or hardship can involve a large amount of engineering effort and resources. Along with military civic
action, which include activities for the provision or restoration of services, military engr support can quickly win the
support of the local population.
1. General Policy. The provision of engr support to CIMIC operations, in general, may be a high priority.
However, before providing civil assistance, the engr support priorities of the deployed force must be of primacy.
Therefore, the initial engr effort for any deployed operation will be largely directed to providing the close support of
the deployed force. The types of engineering projects/tasks that may be encountered during the operation are:
a. TF engr close and general support projects/tasks (ie EOD/mine clearance, accommodation, water supply,
power restoration, etc);
8-15
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
b. humanitarian/military civic action projects (ie facilities/utilities repair, potable water, etc); and
c. dual purpose projects (projects which simultaneously benefits the deployed force and humanitarian relief
such as repairs to bridges, routes, utilities, etc).
2. Coordination Requirements. All humanitarian/civic action projects must, and all dual purpose projects
should, be coordinated by the TF Engr staff with the civil authorities (HN, NGOs, UN, etc). Coordination precludes
competition among contributing agencies for scarce resources such as materials, equipment, fuel, civilian labour
and real estate. It also reduces interference, redundancy and unbalanced assistance.
3. Guidelines. TF engrs will work in conjunction with civil representatives/authorities to establish relations with
and build upon coordination with groups which already exist or are arriving in the theatre of operations. If approved,
humanitarian assistance aimed at ending or alleviating present suffering may include:
a. engineering work associated with providing medical/ dental and veterinary care;
b. provision of potable water and the construction or repair of basic water and sanitation facilities and systems;
b. be of high visibility;
d. be impartially administered in both action and perceived application (engineering support should not be
provided to facilities, such as religious structures and facilities used exclusively or identified with a specific
faction or ethnic group, which may show obvious partiality).
a. cost;
b. labour source (first self help; second contract with local labour; third contract or agreement with
NGO/international labour; fourth military labour);
6. The following specific project types could be considered as low cost, high visibility projects:
b. EOD (although military personnel should perform EOD tasks only in direct support of military operations,
they may, with careful risk analysis and approval from NDHQ/J3, info J3 Engr, conduct EOD tasks in support
of high priority humanitarian projects);
c. survey and repair of damages which pose an immediate safety threat to the civilian population such as
downed power lines, damaged dams, hazardous material storage facilities, and structural damage to high
occupancy public buildings (schools, hospitals, meeting hall, etc);
8-16
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
(4) facilities housing high risk populations (ie elderly, displaced women, children, etc);
f. restoration of supply routes to storage and refrigeration facilities critical to the distribution of humanitarian
relief supplies; and
g. restoration and sustainment of sanitation operations (refuse/sewage collection, treatment and disposal and
rodent/pestilence control).
7. The major contribution of the military engrs to infrastructure restoration will be the creation of an environment
where international civilian relief organizations and local governments and populations can work safely to restore the
infrastructure, economy and living conditions. The direct contribution of the TF engrs should augment, not duplicate
or replace, the efforts of these international and local entities.
8. Due to the politically sensitive nature of CIMIC operations, the TF Engr must ensure that civil coordination
is completed (for dual use projects) and civilian authority approval is granted before commencement. The authority
levels for projects must be coordinated with the TFC, the TF Engr and with NDHQ/J3 Engr guidance for each
specific operation.
9. Military engrs will report all work accomplished in normal SITREPs and reports to the TF Engr as well as to
NGOs and other contributing agencies to avoid duplication of efforts, interference between organizations and to
ensure balanced delivery of any applicable humanitarian assistance.
10. The following points of consideration must be exercised with due diligence by all engr commanders at all
times when considering CIMIC operations:
a. there can be a great number of international civilian relief organizations which could be operating in the
theatre. Information on any others working in the theatre must be obtained;
b. if possible, identify the lead agency in the theatre which is coordinating the efforts of NGOs and other
organizations involved. The key people involved in coordinating the engineering related efforts must be
identified and contact made;
c. if not already functioning, an engr coordination team/group from the ESU or TF Engr cell should be
established to liaise with all agencies; and
d. the availability of local national civilian engrs, architects, contractors and labour (skilled and unskilled) may
be minimal at the onset. If the conditions stabilize, the local population may well have the expertise to begin
rebuilding their infrastructure themselves.
8-17
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 9
SECTION I
COMBINED OPERATIONS
901. INTRODUCTION
1. A combined operation is an operation conducted by forces of two or more allied nations acting together for
the accomplishment of the single mission. Inherent within that definition is the understanding that by "acting
together", the nations are doing things the same way. This, more often than not, is not the case. Hence, there is
a requirement to recognize the differences, such as languages or cultural; if necessary, adapt to a common method,
or in the last case scenario, have a completely coordinated plan of action being fully integrated to adjust to each
nations way of operating.
2. The recognition for standardization and interoperability is a resultant factor of combined operations. The wide
diversity of engr doctrine, organizations, operating procedures, terminology, equipment and materiel amongst
alliance nations has necessitated the use of allied doctrine, standard agreements such as STANAGS and the ABCA
Program (QSTAGS) and the participation amongst Working Groups (WG) to resolve differences.
3. It is important to the successful execution of combined operations, or of those where operations involve the
subordination of units or formations of another nationality, that the differences in national organizations, engr tasks
and procedures are well understood. It is equally important that any adverse effect of these differences on the
outcome of the engr mission is minimized. If standardization agreements do not already exist to permit
interoperability, liaison requirements will be increased and command SOPs will need to be developed. Success in
combined operations will depend largely on the ability to establish clearly defined and mutually attainable aims and
objectives.
1. The quadripartite ABCA Program, recognizing that it is strictly Army oriented, establishes principles for
combined operations that are equally applicable from the combined joint perspective. As a starting point for their
efforts, QWGs require a basic understanding of some of the doctrinal differences and considerations for operating
in a combined, vice unilateral operation. To this end, NDHQ/J3 Engr participates in the QWG Engr working group.
2. The ABCA program recognizes that nations can operate more effectively together if a sound basis for
interoperability is laid before a crisis develops. Interoperable and ideally common doctrine enables forces of differing
capabilities to take advantage of the unique capabilities which each partner brings to the operation.
3. It is the responsibility of NDHQ/J3 Engr to participate in this program and to develop, or ratify the QSTAGS
that will guide engr operations in combined operations. Liaison and establishing working relationships between engr
units as part of combined training and exercises to develop operating procedures is valuable from an environmental
perspective, however, doctrinal development will be established from the NDHQ/J3 Engr.
1. The NATO Alliance established a common goal to guarantee the security and freedom of member countries
through a system of collective defence. Canada is committed to the security of the NATO area and provide forces
to NATO consistent with the current needs of collective defence. In the event of crisis or war in Europe, Canada will
make forces available to NATO, as determined by the Government.
9-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
2. The organization of a combined force and the engr component of that force will depend on several factors as
dictated by the mission. The number of contributing nations, the allied command structure, the degree of HNS and
the type of mission are but a few.
3. Organization of Allied Engrs. Engrs are organized at each level of command differently according to national
structures, and while engrs roles, functions, tasks and principles of employment may be similar, procedures often
differ. In most instances, engr support will rely on the effectiveness of interoperability of equipment and procedures.
The commonality of procedures demands a high level of training and exercising of the personnel who use the
equipment to complete those tasks.
4. Allied Engr Support Concepts. The concepts of engr support amongst allied nations varies widely in policy,
description, content and terminology. Amongst the allied NATO nations, it is most likely that CF will be associated
with either United States (US) or British (UK) forces in a combined operation. To understand doctrine for joint or
combined operations, as described by either of these two nations, familiarity with their doctrine is necessary.
1. The entire US concept of engr support is a major concern within the US engrs, and is in a constant state
of development. The problems stem mainly from a lack of knowledge in working within a joint concept, where the
roles, organizations and abilities are widely unknown. In general, the joint doctrine publication hierarchy, is
complicated and extensive. What would normally be understood as doctrine for engr support is described
in their doctrine for logistic support of joint operations.
2. It is understood by the US that within a theatre of operations, the Engineer and the Logistician share
numerous interests and there is a tendency to combine their command and control structures. They recognize that
this could lead to the detriment of a theatre commander's ability to execute his plan which may require a highly
flexible engr task organization to achieve operational objectives. At present, all focus is towards combat engineering
in a combined arms operation with very limited capabilities for infrastructure "theatre support" engineering. In most
conceivable scenarios, the combat engrs will be unable to cope with the requirements for construction engineering
and related services. At the operational level, support engineering will almost certainly be conducted jointly with
other US service components and probable combined with their allies.
3. The US theatre of engr support "menu of capabilities" is extensive. To fully comprehend the scope of
abilities, the following description is provided:
9-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
- RED HORSE (Rapid Engr Deployable - Heavy Operational Repair Squadron Engr) Civil Engineering
Squadrons
- Large-Scale Prime BEEF(Base Engr Emergency Force) Combat Support Squadrons
- Small-Specialty Prime BEEF Combat Support Teams
- Prime RIBS Units
- Engineering and Services Force Module
- US Army Corps of Engrs (Contingency Real Estate Teams, Water Detection Team, Contracting Teams,
Emergency Response Team)
- Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC)
- 416th ENCOM Facilities Engineering Table of Distribution and Allowance (FETDA) Team
- Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP)
- Host Nation
- Contractors
4. To become integrated into, or work alongside a US organization within a combined operation, firstly requires
a complete understanding of their forces and capabilities. The US concept of engr support is evolving with a new
focus to joint operations. Engr forces are focusing support towards the operational objectives. They emphasize that
engrs support operational and logistical requirements, but must not be rolled into the logistics support structure
of the theatre.
5. Engr support as a whole is described, at present, in the joint publications series 4-0, Joint Logistics. Other
aspects of engr support such as humanitarian assistance or domestic support operations are described in the joint
publications series 3-0, Joint Operations, Operations Other Than War.
1. UK doctrine with regards to joint operations is a different scenario. Within the British Forces, all Royal Engrs
(RE), belong to the Army. It is Army combat engrs that provide the three major support roles: mobility, counter-
mobility and survivability to land forces. They also have the responsibility in joint operations to provide specialist
support to both Royal Navy (RN) amphibious operations and the Royal Air Force (RAF) airfields, terrain analysis,
works services and postal and courier services.
2. In comparison to the US Engr Forces, the UK theatre of engr support available is quite different.
Understanding that the UK Forces have troops in both Germany and the United Kingdom, their organization
framework is based on the NATO ARRC orbat. To fully comprehend the scope of the UK abilities, the following
description is provided:
9-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
d. RN Engr Support
- Engr Support Regiment which is split into a Engr Regiment (V) supporting Harrier Operations in Germany
and two Engr Regiments (V) conducting Airfield Damage Repair in UK.
- Note: (V) is a Volunteer Force, trained by Regular Force troops, which belongs to the British Territorial
Army (TA).
3. Because of this arrangement, it is necessary to understand that in a combined operation with British allied
forces, the engr support is based on Army doctrine and not in a joint context. Coordination of engr units and
resources will be from an Army context of engrs supporting their other services.
9-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION II
CANADIAN ORGANIZATIONS
1. It is DND/CF policy to provide services to a non-defence agency or non-defence affiliated individual when
doing so is in the public interest and is consistent with government policies. It is in the public interest, for example,
to provide assistance in respect of activities contributing to the safety, security or well-being of Canadians and to
the advancement of Canadian interests abroad. Engr support can be a critically important aspect of this type of
service. The availability of engrs and engr equipment to operate in a timely manner, usually in less than favourable
conditions, makes for the request for engr assistance a high priority commodity. Some of the engr support type
tasks that could be requested include:
b. assistance with activities that promote unity, citizenship and community development;
c. assistance with major national undertakings including the hosting of international conferences and amateur
athletic events; and
d. assistance to Canadian agencies undertaking international humanitarian activities that contribute to regional
stability.
2. Services required on a continuing basis should become the subject of a separate formal agreement
(Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement) such as with the Department of Environment concerning issues and
policy guidelines related to the protection and preservation of the environment. The provision of services in support
of the environment will be coordinated through NDHQ/J3 Engr.
3. The provision of specific engr related services that are subject to specific direction or procedures include the
disposal of explosive materials. The technical aspects of DND assistance by qualified EOD personnel are set out
in CFAO 36-31. DND responsibilities in respect to explosive materials disposal are as follows:
b. Non-Defence Explosive Ordnance. Disposal is the responsibility of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan).
Any request for additional assistance from the appropriate civil authority may be authorized, providing the
assistance is within the CF capabilities;
c. Hazardous Chemicals. Responsibility for disposal of hazardous chemicals is divided between the
Environmental Protection Board (EPB), and the provincial ministries. Military engrs will not provide
assistance to this disposal; and
d. Improvised Explosive Devices. IEDs are the responsibility of local police forces such as the RCMP. EOD
trained engrs may provide assistance to a police force who's jurisdiction the IED is located. Coordination
with the engr units chain of command is the responsibility of the Commanding Officer. The national approval
authority for assistance is NDHQ/COS J3 info NDHQ/J3 Engr. If the task is beyond the capability of the
Land Force Area EOD centre, request authority is from NDHQ/J3 Ops/NDOC info NDHQ/J3 Engr.
9-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
1. Military engrs may work with any number of national government sponsored agencies to include the Red
Cross and Red Crescent Societies whose mandate is to provide humanitarian relief during disasters. The Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA) is another aid type agency. Emergency Measures Canada (EMC)
coordinates with federal and provincial authorities for the preparedness of communities in the event of local
emergencies. As an example, typical engineering support to bridging or rafting operations, repair of road networks
or restoration of utilities that may be afforded to the province of BC in the lower mainland in the event of an
earthquake. The Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS) is another government agency they could be
afforded engr support by way of EOD specialists in aid of counter-terrorism operations.
1. Again, consistent with government policy, DND/CF could be requested to provide assistance to a civilian
agency, such as any number of Crown Corporations. If a contract is to be awarded to such an agency, any engr
support that is to be given will be requested through the chain of command to NDHQ where it will be coordinated
through NDHQ/J3 Engr in consultation with the closest engr unit or formation that could provide the support. Likely
corporation or agencies that could be dealt with are Canada Post, CNR/CPR, CBC, Transport Canada, or Public
Works and Government Services Canada.
9-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
SECTION III
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
909. INTRODUCTION
1. Recent experiences with multi-national operations, have clearly demonstrated that military forces will likely,
work alongside civilian agencies as part of conflict resolution, and political policy, to achieve the strategic and
operational objectives. Interagency cooperation is becoming focused to the extent that both the military force and
civilian agency are so dependent on the other for either personal protection or successful military negotiation with
the public population, that the success of the mission can be in jeopardy. A clear understanding of the desired end-
state, or the TFC objectives of the mission, both politically and nationally, must be the basis to initiate a coordinated
plan between the military and civilian agencies, understanding that the burden of coordination falls on the military
because they have the staff, structure and possibly the most to gain. In an effort to address the requirements for
interagency coordination, the US have drafted a joint publication, Joint Publication 3-08: Inter-Agency Coordination
in Joint Operations to describe the common measures for various types of operations.
2. The challenge is to blend the many organizations activities at the strategic, operational and tactical levels,
so that they complement each other as opposed to conflict with each others efforts and resources. At the strategic
level, decisions deal with the ends sought by policy. The operational level addresses ways in which resources are
mobilized and applied to achieve these ends. At the tactical level, the specific means used to achieve the
objectives in pursuit of the overall strategy are addressed. It is at the operational level that engr support to
operations be evaluated to determine if they firstly support the TFC objectives or secondly, they are simply a "nice
to do" task. The cooperation and coordination with international agencies can be a means to achieving several
mission tasks at the same time. This type of cooperation is closely linked to the concepts of CIMIC (Chapter 8).
3. At the operational level, the TF Engr will evaluate the ways in which engr services can be afforded to the
different agencies. The differences between a military civic action or a humanitarian assistance type task should
be evaluated against the criteria of primacy of operations, risk assessment, availability of resources, time,
equipment, manpower and simply "being the good guy".
4. The greatest barrier to effective coordination within a theatre of operations is the many separate chains of
command and the information Astovepipes@ that will exist. Depending on the organization, the degree of support or
effort not to work in isolation will differ. For the coordination of engr support that could be effected, the TF Engr
should make every effort to establish liaison and a working relationship with the civilian agencies. For it will be at
the tactical level where either the component engrs or the force level engr units will execute the specific methods
to provide support. If the two methods are complimentary, the objectives are easily attained.
1. The proliferation of NGOs or PVOs has magnified the coordination problems between military and civilian
agencies in operations. However, along with the problems, comes a wealth of resources. Before any coordination
is affected with a NGO, a complete understanding of their legal status, functions, resources, operating principles
and level of expertise must be identified. Depending on their country of origin or their international affiliation, a NGO
may only have status for tax purposes or a religious, political or national affiliation.
a. emergency humanitarian assistance for food, medical care, shelter, refugee assistance and land mine
awareness;
c. conflict intervention by human rights monitoring, third-party mediation, conciliation and conflict resolution,
demobilization and reintegration of militias and democratic institution building.
9-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
3. Natural alliances may arise between organizations with complimentary functions such as CARE who may
establish feeding stations that would attract patients for Doctors Without Borders/Medicins Sans Frontiers (MSF)
or the UNHCR establishing refugee camps where OXFAM provides education services.
4. The scope of engineering tasks that could be provided are easy to recognize. It is the responsibility of the
TF Engr or the senior military engr commander to evaluate and prioritize any support to be provided based on a
complete estimate of the situation. The degree of cooperation and amount of coordination or even the willingness
of some NGOs to integrate themselves into a larger effort can at times vary and hence cause conflict and confusion.
At the same time, the maintenance of a physical separation in distance between the two must be understood from
the perception of credibility, neutrality and security. Military forces must recognize and be prepared to react to these
situations.
911. UN ORGANIZATIONS
1. Coordination with UN organizations will generally be focused towards a peace support operation or a
humanitarian assistance operation, where the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) will most
likely be the lead agency. The deployment of a UN military force along side a civilian agency will face coordination
problems at the tactical and operational levels which will be originated by the UN strategy. Understanding and
recognizing this will assist the TFC and staff prior to deployment. A well coordinated campaign plan that considers
the following engineering related tasks to support the operational plan will be an asset:
a. the creation of stable living and working conditions which permit civilians including the UNHCR to carry on
with their normal functions. The restoration of medical facilities, schools, civilian authority buildings, police
forces, utilities and infrastructure;
d. the construction of temporary shelters for refugees and displaced persons that act as part of a military
security function but also is perceived as a humanitarian gesture in support of UNHCR efforts; and
e. the assistance of military engr trades for the expertise in electrical, heating, refrigeration and sanitation
functions in aid of a medical facility or aid operation.
2. A critical factor that must be understood by military support to, or cooperation with, a humanitarian agency
like UNHCR is the perception of impartiality. The UNHCR is on the side of the victims. There can be no perception
by the belligerents or combattants that all aid or support is to one side. From an engineering perspective,
understanding that a restoration of a water source or the repair of a bridge to one side of the conflict might give the
wrong impression. Evaluation of accepted engr tasks must take this into account.
9-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
CHAPTER 10
1001. INTRODUCTION
1. Specific operations such as airmobile, airborne and amphibious operations are operations which require close
cooperation with an air or naval force to get ground combat troops to an objective. Such operations require detailed
planning and execution. The initial and subsequent C2 measures of forces during specific operations as they relate
to supporting engrs are discussed in this manual. Individual environmental doctrine for these operations is beyond
its scope.
2. Engr doctrine as it relates to these types of operations is to define the C2 and if necessary the transfer of
command authority of engr troops and resources. All three of these types of operations are fluid in nature and rely
on a commanders decision to transfer authority at some stage of the operation. Usually reporting to a TFC, it is
assumed that there will be a TF Engr advisor to the TFC to coordinate engr activities. Centralized command and
decentralized control will be maintained by engr forces in these types of operations.
1. An airmobile operation is an operation in which land forces and their equipment manoeuvre about the
battlefield in helicopters to engage in ground combat operations. When the execution of ground operations is
dependent on the tactical use of helicopters, the ground force commander will be in charge. He will thus require
OPCON of the helicopters allocated for the insertion, protection of the insertion or support of the insertion. The
landing area for the dismounting of troops will also be under his control. At a time designated by the ground force
commander, likely when it is secured and there is no threat from direct or indirect fire, will he likely transfer authority
to control and coordinate follow-on forces at the landing area to an air component commander for the build-up of
facilities, landing areas or construction of a airfield. The resultant control of engr support to an airmobile operation
is that , until such time that the ground force commander transfers control, all engr support operations are OPCON
to the ground force commander.
1. Airborne forces are uniquely organized, equipped and trained to be delivered by parachute into an objective
area. Airborne operations may be conducted independent or in conjunction with other operations or ground forces.
Airborne engrs will be OPCOM of the airborne force commander as detailed by operational orders. This could be
either for a specific task or for a specific period of time or even as part of the advance force operations to support
the seizure and clearing of DZs and LZs. Coordination will have been completed by the TF Engr and TF staff prior
to mounting.
2. Insertion of an airborne force will be mounted from either Canada or from a forward mounting base (FMB).
If mounted from Canada, the airborne force, while in transit, will be under OPCON of the TFC with the airborne force
commander having TACOM of the force. Once in the theatre of operations, the airborne force comes under OPCON
of the TFC.
1. Amphibious operations will be conducted in accordance with ATP-8 and ATP-37, under OPCON of the TFC.
Tactical command (TACOM) will be delegated to the amphibious force commander. He will control any and all
assigned engr forces and coordinate movement of other friendly forces in the objective area. The commander landing
force (CLF) has tactical control (TACON) of the landing force and will be responsible to the commander amphibious
force (CAF) for operations ashore. On termination of the amphibious operations, the amphibious objective area
(AOA) will be dis-established and the landing force will, if not re-embarked, prepare for subsequent operations
ashore. In a typical case scenario, engr support during an amphibious operation for the purpose of clearing water
and/or shore obstacles and/or mines and booby traps will be supporting the CAF in the AOA. Once secured ashore
10-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
the engrs will be under TACOM to the CLF who is OPCON to the TFC. If applicable, the TF Engr will advise the TFC
on all aspects of engr support.
1. Environmental conditions that effect engr support to operations include the effects of jungles, forests,
mountains, arctic and cold weather, coastal areas and inland riverine areas, limited visibility, built-up areas and NBC
weapons. These environmental conditions may, at any time of an operation, be experienced simultaneously,
sequentially or in any fashion or degree of severity. The extent to which the environmental conditions effect
operations, must for obvious reasons, be taken into consideration during engr planning.
2. Doctrinally, it is difficult to detail procedures for any of these environments because of the number of variables
that could affect the situation. It is the responsibility of the Environmental Chiefs of Staff to detail engr doctrine as
it applies in these conditions. From a CF perspective, as with specific operations, the C2 relationships of engr
troops and resources are the focus. Engr planning starts at the highest levels and is transmitted down the chain
of command. Its is the responsibility of the NDHQ/J3 Engr to state any engr policy guidelines as it applies to an
individual operation.
3. An example, to put the engr doctrine into perspective, is the scenario of combat engrs and airfield engrs and
equipment being deployed to the northern arctic regions to secure an objective as part of a CF TF. The mission
requires the construction/improvement of an snow/ice airfield, a control tower, field defences, obstacles and
infrastructure to support air operations. Any and all engrs will be under OPCOM of the TFC (ground) commander,
OPCON of the TF Engr until such a time, as detailed in the operational plan, (coordinated by the J3 Engr) that the
senior air component engr takes command of his airfield engrs for the sustainment of future air operations.
10-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
Administration (AAP-6)
The management and execution of all military matters not included in tactics and strategy; primarily in the
fields of logistics and personnel management.
Airhead (AAP-6)
(1) A designated area in a hostile or threatened territory, which, when seized and held, ensures the
continuous air landing of troops and material and provides the manoeuvre space necessary for
projected operations. Normally it is the area seized in the assault phase of an airborne operation.
(2) A designated location in an area of operations used as a base for supply and evacuation by air.
GL-E-1
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
Campaign (B-GL-303-002/JX-Z03)
A series of military operations in one theater of operations designed to achieve a specific strategic objective.
Capability (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
The state of having sufficient power, skills and ability to carry out a military activity or operation.
Capacity (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
The ability to execute a military activity or operation.
Combined (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
A qualifier used to indicate that a military activity, operation or organization involves one or more Services
of two or more allies.
Command (AAP-6)
The authority vested in an individual of the armed forces for the direction, coordination, and control of military
forces.
GL-E-2
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
The assembly of equipment, methods and procedures, and if necessary personnel, organized so as to
accomplish specific information conveyance and processing functions.
Conflict (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
A struggle or clash between alliances, individual states or factions within a state to achieve political
objectives. When military force is used, the conflict becomes an armed conflict.
Contingency (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
An unforecasted or chance situation which may require a military response.
Control (AAP-6)
That authority exercised by a commander over part of the activities of subordinate organizations, or other
organizations not normally under his command, which encompasses the responsibility for implementing
orders or directions. All or part of this authority may be transferred or delegated.
Deception (AAP-6)
Those measures designed to mislead the enemy by manipulation, distortion or falsification of evidence to
induce him to react in a manner prejudicial to his interests.
GL-E-3
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
The action by which a commander assigns part of his authority commensurate with the assigned task to
a subordinate commander. While ultimate responsibility cannot be relinquished, delegation of authority
carries with it the imposition of a measure of responsibility. The extent of the authority delegated must be
clearly stated.
Demining (AAP-19)
Activities to remove the hazards of all mines and unexploded munitions from a defined area.
Directive (AAP-6)
(1) A military communication in which policy is established or a specific action is ordered.
(2) A plan issued with a view to putting it into effect when so directed, or in the event that a stated
contingency arises.
(3) Broadly speaking, any communication which initiates or governs action, conduct or procedure.
Doctrine (AAP-6)
Fundamental principles by which the military forces guide their actions in support of objectives. It is
authoritative but requires judgement in application.
Embarkation (AAP-6)
The process of putting personnel and/or vehicles, stores and equipment into ships or aircraft.
Upon declaring one of these emergencies, the Governor in Council is empowered to pass regulations in
specified areas so as to enable the taking of special temporary measures necessary to deal with the
national emergency.
GL-E-4
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
A logical process of reasoning by which a commander considers all the circumstances affecting the military
situation and arrives at a decision as to the course of action to be taken in order to accomplish his mission.
(1) Development and establishment of criteria for the evaluation of geographic factors in light of military
operations and planning, including the requirement to support crisis management.
(3) Provision of the geodetic sources for precise measurement and determination of locations, points
and azimuths, for navigation on land, sea and in air, as well as for the production of geographic
information.
(6) Provision of terrain analysis products, military geomatics information and associated studies.
GL-E-5
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
Geomatics (ATP-52(B))
The ensemble of earth measurement sciences, is the term used to describe those scientific and engineering
activities involved in the capture, storage, analysis, processing, presentation, dissemination and
management of geospatial information.
Information (AAP-6)
Unprocessed data of every description which may be used in the production of intelligence.
In Support of (AAP-6)
Assisting or protecting another formation, unit or organization while remaining under original control.
Intelligence (AAP-6)
The product resulting from the processing of information concerning foreign nations, hostile or potentially
hostile forces or elements, or areas of actual or potential operations. The term is also applied to the activity
which results in the product and the organizations engaged in such activity.
Intensity (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
The level of effort assigned in support of a commitment commensurate with its overall importance.
Joint (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
An adjective that connotes activities, operations, organization in which elements of more than one service
of the same nation participates. (When all services are not involved, the participating services shall be
identified). See also combined.
Logistics (AAP-6)
The science of planning and carrying out the movement and maintenance of forces. In its most
comprehensive sense, those aspects of military operations that deal with:
(a) design and development, acquisition, storage, movement, distribution, maintenance, evacuation,
and disposition of material;
GL-E-6
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
Mission (AAP-6)
A clear, concise statement of the task of the command and its purpose.
(a) seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature
as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it; or
(b) seriously threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security
and territorial integrity of Canada and that cannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of
Canada.
Operation (AAP-6)
A military action or the carrying out of a strategic, tactical, Service, training or administrative military
mission; the process of carrying on combat, including movement, supply, attack, defence and manoeuvre
needed to gain the objectives of any battle or campaign.
GL-E-7
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
Peacebuilding (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
Post-conflict actions in the aftermath of international conflict or civil strife to strengthen and solidify peace
in order to avoid a relapse into conflict.
Peacekeeping (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
The prevention, containment, moderation and termination of hostilities between or within states through an
impartial third-party intervention organized and directed internationally for restoring and maintaining peace.
This intervention is conducted using military forces, police and civilians and usually with the consent of the
main belligerents.
Peacemaking (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
The process of resolving disputes that could lead to conflict, primarily through diplomacy, mediation,
negotiation or other forms of peaceful settlement.
GL-E-8
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
that results or may result in a danger to life or property, social disruption or a breakdown in the flow of
essential goods, services or resources so serious as to be a national emergency.
Security (AAP-6)
(1) The condition achieved when designated information, material, personnel, activities and installations
are protected against espionage, sabotage, subversion and terrorism, as well as against loss or
unauthorized disclosure.
Support (AAP-6)
GL-E-9
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
The action of a force, or portion thereof, which aids, protects, complements, or sustains any other force.
Sustainment (B-GG-005-004/AF-000)
The requirement for a military force to maintain its operational capability for the duration required to achieve
its objectives. Sustainment consists of the continued supply of consumables, and the replacement of
combat losses and non-combat attrition of equipment and personnel.
Task (B-GL-303-002/JX-Z03)
An activity which contributes to the achievement of a mission.
GL-E-10
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
GLOSSARY
GL-E-11/GL-E-12
B-GG-005-004/AF-015
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
LA-E-1