JMEUT Volume 50 Issue 4 Pages 45-49

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

14 5+6 , 14* 6 : . 2 ' 1 ' + / 0*& -*. +,* '() *& % !

&

7 7 2 1 86 5 3 4 - . /, 0 1 2 , + + 7
*
7 7 2 1 86 5 3 4 - . /, 0 1 2 , , / 7 8

.
3

641 > C <; ; 9 D 8 ; 2> A B> > > @ < @ 4 1 ; ? 1 > : = <; ; 9 4: 9
50

N L . 1 + F 1 M <; 1 + Thermoflow K J I1 9 < @ 9H > 3 > 9 6 C 6 . F 4 1EC


C 6 < > <U K9 T RS 1 > V K3 5 7 <U T RS W . 1 +J F EES K J > <U K9 T RS P QM O
4

< ; > . + . 30/69 N / 234/89 Y >X 4 7 3 4 X 4 7 . 1 +P QM E 1 < @< ) ,9; > TS


N / 113/6 210/6 216/6 Y > _ ; > R > ; 9 <; 1A ^ ; ; 9 < @TS ; E@ < ) ,9; > C 6 , > . 45/57 <U K9
+ 1 > 9 2 7 @7 > /: , ; ; 9 < b N `a 1 +T RS 0 N . > 4 : E@ 2 . 1
49-45 !"# 1399

. 1
.<U K9 T RS <U T RS d 1P c; <; ; 9 : = <; ;9 4 : :1 0 1 : 46,

Thermodynamic analysis of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant:


Energy, Exergy

Department of Mechanical Engineering (MSc), K. N. Toosi university of technology, Tehran,


M. Janbaz Iran
Department of Mechanical Engineering (Associate Professor), K. N. Toosi university of
A. Behbahaninia technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The integrated gasification combined cycle power plant using hydrocarbon fuels produces cleaner and more efficient electricity
through gasification, compared to direct fuel burning. In this paper, the power plant has been simulated and validated by
Thermoflow software according power plant characteristics. The assumptions are applied and exergy analysis is done using EES
software. The results of energy and power consumption analysis of the obtained components and exergy analysis are applied to find
the values and locations of system irreversibility. The net output of the cycle and thermal efficiency are 234.89 MW and 30.69%
respectively. The exergy efficiency of the power plant is 45.57%. Maximum amount of irreversibility is from the gasifire, gas
cleanup system, and HRSG, respectively 216.600, 210.607 and 113.653 MW. Finally, the cycle is analyzed parametrically and the
effects of the gas temperature change and pressure of the condenser on the efficiency and final power of the power plant have
investigated.
Keywords: Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, Gasification, coal, Energy Analysis, Exergy Analysis.

^ [3] + ^ 3 4 p ^ ; -1
<@ 4 1 > T < > Q ^ <U <; ; 9 B > > d 1P c; T < > A + <; ; 9
l> , @ ^ 6 RQM T >. + ? T < 6 1 . [1 ] + > 41e 1 Q+
; 1 . >7 C > B ^ ; T f ; 9 <; 1 Q f< 0 1 ; 9 > d 1P c;
> + <; l > qK3 , > 4 1 ; Q 7 3 23 - 1 gh1 - 8;9 >71 1 1 ; T f
> B ^ < @; 9 J Q > B ^ ; -> <; <@ ?1 < 6 ; @ 9 . + ? 1 < 2+ ; 9
. K Q h S <@ , k K> > < @7 3 ; ; 9 ^ I1 ; 9 6 > ?1 ;9
4 1 <U K9 K < > 7 Q@ K 2011 P 1 6 iR j Q +<@ JF . + d 1P c; 7 +
@ 1 + O > [4 ] D CS ; ; 9 < 4: 1 41 P O : P <@ ^ > @ 9
T RS KF 7 <; 1 2> : = <; ; 9 < 4: > : = <; ; 9 < 4 : <@ 9 +)9 < @P 1
> 9 2013 P 1 . + JF <U K9 N ?R T l @ /, l < Q f > ; 7U @ B > < > k K> < @ ;
<; ; 9 > IGCC < @ 4 : RQM T RS > 7 Q@ . [2 ] 1 + m ^
T + + < C > F W [5] 4 d 1P c; <; ; 9 n @ ^ 1 N ^ B ^ n @
< D CS < > ; > d 1P c; <; ; 9 4 Nl S C B ^ P8 6 > > 1 Q+ 41
3 ^ 8 2018 P 1 7 Q@ +6 > . + <@ 4 : oM > + >T 8> < 1
*
alibehbahaninia@kntu.ac.ir : 1

97/10/30 : !
98/07/08 :( ) !
< @ 5 4 > <; 9 ^ 6 . + v > @ <; 1 3 < @ ^ 7 L > q IGCC <@ 4 :

T RS
R > ;96 > T + 4 : .[11] E@ Q > 7H > F 6 7, , < @
. + 8> Q < @E 1 j> 6 > _ ; > .[6] + 9 7 < . 12/2 r K ,>7 X4
14 5+6 , 14* 6 % !& -3 <; 1 2> 3 ( > K [7] 2018 P 1 7 Q@ K
< @P U ; GTpro - h 6 + ?1 KJ 9 F 7U @ < > IGCC < @ 4 :

4: 9
^ 8 < > < F K J 0 GTpro . 1 Thermoflow K J 7U @ oM > 6 3 < @d 1P c; ; ?1
@9 4 : <U T RS < > 1 <@ 4 : e . 4 :6 >7 + < 7;
. 1 + ?1 F 7 > Xf @ 9 e 6 ; > 9 s > 3 >

...
6 f {C 7 > 1 < JF T 6 l > <U K9 6 T 4 + 4 : <; 1 2> 23 2 > <U T RS
IS > P - > 7 4 + <; 1 2> 23 0 U K9 t S ; 7 < K3 9
r, 8 b < @ N ` _ c .[12] 1 Q@ Kq ^ > <U K9 N u @< ) ,9; > TS C
, 3 Q+ K VK3 2: > E 1 0 <U K9 Sh1 R KJ ; ?1 > 9 0 > C 6 . 1
. + E C (1) < h> D 8 T T RS w=1 1 + F1 M [8] v3 > <; 1 +
ex = ex + ex + ex + ex (1) . 1 1 >7 W +J F 9 <U K9
1 + + 4 : < K3 < > <U K9 I> 1 T + > 3 >
4 1 <U K9 nu 4 > > K3 @ <U K9 Y j R 8 > > ?*@ -2
. 1 + ; 1 K3 P 5S @ 41 ; T + : = <; ; 9 4:
: @;1 3 ^ @ 9 6 x 4 < @ 9H < > . 1 1 T + D> h
= + (2) < ?y @ ;1 3 Q f. 4 x 4 <; I + > / >
= + −( − ) (3)
7 M > ;9 6> > 7U ; ; 9 Q f > 7H 7 1
:; ;9
64 1T f >;97 3. 9 D f <; < > <; 9
= !
+ "+
!
# − !
$ (4)
= +
&!
+
&!

&!
(5) .[9 ] + ?5 T 1 Q f
% $ #
:; 9 <; ^ > 7H ; IGCC < @ 9 @; ; 9 B ? > Y f p
= %+ + (6) . ? 1 <; ; 9 T M 7 M > . 85 Tf ^ x R4
= + + + (7) . 99.5 85 ^ IGCC RQM ; 7H x R4
:HPTA j> 6 > 7 n. > + @ <; 1 3 Q f IS < @. @
= − (8)
!&'
+ P 1 ; ; 9 > <; 1 3 7 7H < O^u T> f
!&' = !&' (9)
. + Rj I S > K C>
:HPTL j> 6 >
= (10) z Rj _ > + _ 1 d 1P c; <; ; 9 Q f
!&'( " − #

!&'( = !&'( (11) 6 + , +; M ; -> K X 4 7H . + ; ;9


:LPTL j> 6 > iR j < @ 9H . + 7 ; ;9 , > , EO
(&'( = %− $ (12) vhf 8 > ; ; 9 ^ 0 4 + ; < @ ^ > z > N M L
= (13)
(&'( (&'(
O > 9 6 ; YRc .[10] <U > / >
: /:
. + ? 1 j> < @6 > 7 < > j>
)*+ = $− (14)
= − (15) Q f <@ ^ ; 3 4v Q f 2
)*+

:31 ~Q . 1 ; ;9
& = & (16) w < K 1;9 ? 1 > ;> < 1 ;9v ^
& = − (17) 0 4 w=1 + ? 1K @ Q f @> 1 ; M;
:32 ~Q 1 ;9 6> > + 3 7 < 1 < @; 9 +
= (18)
& &
A 3 <; 1 3 T + ; 9 ?5 . +
& = − (19)
@ 5 4 6 E2 3 H2S ? 1N . 1 @ R

46
11 20
F
17
5 4 comb
8
2 2> RM ; >7 3

21
SCR 13 19
6 FP

comp
ASU 7 16
2
AGR
COS H C 14
3

GF
1
15 18 22
12

10 9 24

Mi20 30
28 29

23 15 14 24 26 27 25

32 33
HRSG 22
cond 34
35
31
pu31
23
pu32

. 2 '1 ' + / 0*& -*. +,* 0 1 6)A*@ -1 %

4/9 72910 76673 (kW) j> 4 : 7 : 1 =Q


),& = ),& (20)
),& = %− # (21)
14* 6 % !& C' -2-4
:B ^ O?S
R > < 1 N / 235 ^ 9 2 y = + $ (22)
),- "
7 3 04• > > > j> 4 : ; @ , _ ;> ),- = − 0.93443 ∗ % (23)
2P 3 9 <U T RS ; 1 >W . 1 - 8 Q B ^ < O?S > 1 =Q , < @ ٪6/56
4:7 + @, 87 Q@ . 1 +7 > T 5? > . + ;96 > EC 8 > r ;N . >
1 N / 286/691 . 30/69 Y >X 4 y :; 9 6 >
234/896 7 X 4 y€ 2 n 5 7 N / 51/795 C ' = + 0.06557 ∗ % − (24)
= (25)
. 1 N / ' '

:_ ; > R >
!7 = + !7 (26)
+,* 14* 6 % !& 6 %# A C' -2 E, =( − )+( + )+( − )+( − ) (27)
!7 "
C :E 1T
234896 (kW) 9 3 4X 47 ')' = " − (28)
30/69 (HHV) 7 ')' = ' + (&'( + !&'( + !&' − ),& − & % (29)
25/11 CHP 7 − & $ − & − & −

374504 (kW); 9 6 > 7


170506 (kW) @ 1 =Q 7 B!7 , C' D6 6 -4
86673 (kW) j> 6 > 7 / 86 -1-4
39830 (kW)ASU 5 7
M [8] v3 > + -1 P ; 1 > W
908 (kW)31 ~Q 7
. 1 + C 1P 3 W F1
51 (kW)32 ~Q 7
1* 6 *7 -3-4 F * 7 1 / +,* / 86 -1 E,
2 ; ;9 RQM < > T M 6 )9 `a ; (٪)n S v3 L^
; ?1 > < 8 > . 1 ; ;9 < 4: 7 3/6 41/06 42/6 (٪) 9 7
٪5 ٪4 4:7 7 K 1 ; 9 ,> < @ 04 9/43 24/01 26/51 (٪) j> 4 : 7
7 9 , > ?8 0 4 < @E 1 > C 4/8 272921 286691 (kW) 9 X 4 7

47
. + > K3 @ < > <U K9 ; w=1 1 > iR j 7 < > ; ;9 < `a i •2 T + Q . +

T RS
; 3 4 K 1 ;9 C +Xj, d 1P c; 5 > h4 € C N . > rK > + @ , PURPA
+;96> ?5 T^ 8; w 1 >; ;9 9 2 7 r@ € > K Y•2 T + > r@
S < 7 M > + _ ;> R > 6> 3 4. 1 . + @, ; ;9< r K `
. TQM j> < 4 :

4: 9
6 ,> . @ 7, <U K9 T RS W 3 P 3 (i )
>Y > 32 ~Q ; 9 6 > > z > <U K9 ; > 6 Q
33/8 . 32/9 > GF GCS . 1 . 47/33 . 98/58

...
JF T > @ Y j C 6 ,> < .
. 1 K 2F @ Q + < @r

+,* 14 5+6 % !& 6 %# A C' -3 E,


ɳ;<
: =:;< >
: (KW) K3
70/13 0/01868 11950 @;1 3
- 0/0006645 425 49 6 + , +
68/26 0/3386 216600 ; ;9 (_)

70/58 0/3292 210607 ; 9 <; ^


94/99 0/01335 8538 1 =Q
87/88 0/09322 59631 B ^ O?S
98/58 0/008364 5350 ;96 >
55/63 0/1777 113653 _ ;> R >
90/5 0/004328 2769 HPTA j> 6 >
99/7 0/0000272 17.45 HPTL j> 6 >
91/57 0/008018 5129 LPTL j> 6 >
66/63 0/005797 3708 /:
6() -K . ' + 1 ( *L6 ( 6 * M& 6() -HI6 :(2) %
79/92 0/0002851 182.4 31 ~Q
' + 1 ( *L6 ( -*. ' 6)& * M&
47/33 0/00004202 26.88 32 ~Q
45/57 - 639689 E 1T RQM < > /: , r@ `a K 3 T +
r@ 6 E + O 87 Q@ E > lptl j> 6 >
1* + -5 <U K9 ; 2> : @ ? 1 6 > < 7 r K oM > ,
4: 9 RQM C 6 +7 > 87 Q@ . 1 + 1 6 P 1
P Q- < @ 9 ; A > < > : = ; ;9
4 : 6 r . + 1 > <U K9 <U ; ; 1 d 1P c;
; ;9 > d 1P c; E C 7 ; 1 < F> 1 < 9 >
I + @ ;1 3 ^ + X 4 7H 0Q >
^ ?5 T^ 7 )9 8 + K 1 ; 9 +P
4 : 0 w7; + ;9 6> ; 9 <;
KJ 9 <; 1 + > > . 3 < > P Q-
tS; O < @ 9H P QM > E 4 R
? 1 > w=1 . + J F 4 : <U T RS 9 < @ 9H
EES K J 0Q > 4 : iR j z C x 4;
I R. PQ * M& *L6 ( N7 O 7 )& 6)& * M& 6() -3 %
<@ b > JF 1 E T RS <U K9 t S ; 4:
14 5+6 % !& C' -4-4
W E 1 > 9 R RQM ^ zC E2
EES KJ 6 f ; ?1 > 9
: 1 ; ƒ + > @T RS 6 ; 1 > E2
x 4 < f j> K J 6 ; ? 1 RM . 1 +T RS
286/691 ٪30/69 Y > 7 y 4: 7
>. 1 7 7 iR j < @P 1
€ 2 n 5 7 N / 51/795 C > @ 4 N /
zC 3 <U K9 iR j z C x 4 6+

48
F and Environmental Protection,Vol. 89, pp.41-52, ; ; 9 < r@ > . 1 N / 234/896 7 X 4 y
2011.
[2] Laugwitz A., Grabner M., Meyer B., Availability 6 sQ@ > r K h4 N . > € C 4 : R 7
2 2> RM ; >7 3

analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle


(IGCC) power plants, Power plant life management
<U K9 < ; > . + @, K 9 2 7 r K €>
and performance improvement, pp.110-142 ,2011. < @TS ; E@ < ) ,9; > C 6 , > ٪45/57 9
[3] Wang T., Stiegel G., Integrated Gasification
Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technologies, Hughes, s., 216/600 > > > Y > _ ; > R > ; 9 <; ^ ; ;9
Woodhead Publishing, chpter 1, United Kingdom, . 1 N / 113/653 210/607
2017.
[4] Christian K., Riedl K., Spliethoff H., Structured
exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined :( -6
cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture, Korean J.
Chem. Eng,Vol. 36, No. 3, pp.1480-1487,2011. : = <; ;9 4: IGCC
[5] Grabner M., Meyer B., Performance and exergy _ ;> R > HRSG
analysis of the current developments in coal
gasification technology, Fuel,Vol. 116, pp.910- ; 9 <; ^ AGR
920,2013. (kg/s) 3 > m
[6] Shi B., Xu W., Wu E., WeiWu, Kuo P., Novel design
of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) (kW) <U K9 E
power plants with CO2 capture, Journal of Cleaner (kJ/kg) H <U K9 ex
Production, Vol. 195, pp. 176-186, 2018.
[7] Al-Zareer M., Dincer I., Rosen A., Multi-objective % <U K9 Y j y
Optimization of an Integrated Gasification Combined
(kW) 7 W
Cycle for Hydrogen and Electricity Production,
Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2017. E 1 sys
[8] Wang T., Henry A Long., Performance and Economic
Analysis of Biomass/Coal Co-Gasification IGCC < In
Systems with Supercritical Steam Bottom Cycle, 3 4 Out
Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International
Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, T Tot
Houston, Texas, USA, pp.1-3,2012.
; ;9 GF
[9] Emun F., Gadalla M., Majozi T., Boer D., Integrated
gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process ;96> GT
simulation and optimization, Computers and 04 C
Chemical Engineering,Vol. 34, pp.331-338 ,2010.
[10] Soltani, S., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Yari, M., Morosuk, T., COS K @ ^ COS H
Rosen, MA., Zare, V., A comparative exergoeconomic
analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power > 1 SCR
plants, Energy Conversion and Management,Vol. 76, 4 1 <; 1 ^ FP
pp.83-91,2013.
[11] Melchior, T., Madlener, R., Economic evaluation of @ <; 1 3 ^ ASU
IGCC plants with hot gas cleaning, Applied Energy, ; 9 <; ^ GCS
Vol. 97, pp.170-184, 2012.
[12] Bejan A., Tsatsaronis G., Moran M., Thermal Design 6 z Rj Mi
and Optimization, John Wiley, Chap. 3, Canada, 1996. l > , j> 6 > HPTA
j> 6 > HPTL
6 , j> 6 > LPTL
/: cond
~Q Pu
1 =Q comp
B ^ O?S comb
K PH
, 3 KN
T PT
Q+ CH
VK3 i
Y j D
nu L

F 6* -7
[1] Sarah E., Sinclair., The sustainability of clean coal
technology: IGCC with/without CCS, Process Safety

49

You might also like