SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES

Minutes of the Proposal Defense (MOM)

MAEd & Ph.D. Degree Programs
Name of Candidate Date
Degree Program Time Started
Participants Time Ended
Moderator
Panel Member #1
Panel Member #2
Panel Member #3
Panel Member #4
Adviser

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page #
Statement of the Problem
Hypothesis/es
Assumption/s of the Study

Study Variables, Categories

and Indicators
Theoritical Framework
Conceptual Framework
Scope of the Study
Significance of the Study
Definition of Terms

Chapter 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page #
Conceptual Literature
Research Literature
Synthesis

Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page #
Research Design
Locale of the Study
Respondents of the Study

Data Gathering Instrument

(Validity & Reliabilty)
Data Gathering Procedure
Analytical Schemes
Statistical Tools

Prepared By Code: PM Panel Member

Designation
E-mail Address
 PM#/Initial

PM#/Initial

PM#/Initial

nel Member
 SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
Minutes of the Final Defense (MOM)
Ph.D. Degree Program
Name of Candidate CLAUDINE I. SARTE Date February 04, 2021
Degree Program PhD, Educational Management Time Started 8:30 P.M
Participants Time Ended 10:22 P.M.
Moderator Dr. Lilybeth P. Eslabon
Panel Member #1 Dr. May Bautista
Panel Member #2 Dr. Wilfredo Hermosura
Panel Member #3 Dr. Mima Villanueva
Panel Member #4 Dr. Rey Eslabon
Adviser Dr. Anelito A. Bongcawil

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page # PM#/Initial

Final Title: Extent of Implementation of Outcomes-Based

Instruction and Level of Teachers’ Commitment: Basis for an
Action Plan

Say somethng that the study is grounded in the school level.

Backgroud of the Study Add one paragrpah 3
Statement of the Problem Add one objective for relationship on extent of 4
implementation and the teachers' commitment
Hypothesis/es Add 1
Assumption/s of the Study Place before Study Variables. Add 1 assumption 1, 4
Study Variables, Categories
and Indicators Use hanging table 4
Ground/link it with the study
Theoretical Framework 2
Conceptual Framework Have discusiion on major variables 3
Scope of the Study One-liner for each part of Chapter 3
Significance of the Study None

Alphabetize the terms. Define Highest Educational

Definition of Terms Attainment 2, 4
Chapter 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page # PM#/Initial

Conceptual Literature Delete references before 2014 M

Research Literature None

Synthesis None - - -
Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page # PM#/Initial

Research Design None

Locale of the Study None

Respondents of the Study Change Grand Total to Total 4

Data Gathering Instrument There must be two results for reliability. Have one sentence
(Validity & Reliabilty) per validator
Data Gathering Procedure none
Objectives 6 and 7 are comparative, not relational. Extent of
implementation and the teachers' commitment, use
Analytical Schemes relational 4
Statistical Tools Add 1 for extent of implementation and the teachers'
commitment 4
Chapter 4 PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION OF DATA
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page # PM#/Initial
Profile of Respondents
Do not cite conceptual literature in chapter 4. Cite related literature instead. 3
Tables Table 13, label it as "Younger" and "Older" 2
Discuss lowest items 2
Chapter 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
Comments/Suggestions/Corrections Revisions Page # PM#/Initial
One objective, one finding, one conclusion, one
Summary of Findings recommendation 1, 2
Conclusions Exclude Spady and others. 4
Change paragraph 3, Focus on low extent. It must answer
5Ws and 1H. Add column before the objectives for the
Recommendations Action Plan 3,4
REFERENCES
APPENDICES

Prepared By ANELITO A. BONGCAWIL, Ed. D. Code: PM Panel Member

Designation Adviser, Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
E-mail Address anelito.bongcawil2016@gmail.com