Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Naguib Mahfouz - The Personal and The Political in Wedding Song
Naguib Mahfouz - The Personal and The Political in Wedding Song
Alaa Fathy
Naguib Mahfouz is a household name in Egypt as a master writer and a Nobel Laureate
—the first to win in Literature from the Arab world. His name is also associated with
controversy as he attracts criticism mainly from conservatives who denounce the portrayal of
‘immoral’ characters, exposing social ailments and chronicling taboos, of which Mahfouz’s
literature is characteristic. “In all my writing, you will find politics.” Mahfouz once stated, “You
may find a story which ignores love, or any other subject, but not politics; it is the very axis of
our thinking” (qtd. in El-Enany 23). Though a master of storytelling, Mahfouz is essentially an
intellectual and a social critic, and the commentary, or rather the exposition of the social and
One of Mahfouz’s great works—though not usually cited among the best works, is his
short novel Wedding Song (1981) which stylistically stands out in Mahfouz’s oeuvre, along with
Miramar (1967) and The Day the Leader was Killed (1985), having been narrated through
different points of view of the characters. Mahfouz the storyteller in Wedding Song threads a
complex story of a group of people working in a theatre: it recounts love in different stages and
forms, familial upbringing and its influence on the self and interpersonal relationships, the
paradox of morality and ideals between art and reality, but Mahfouz the social critic most
remarkably offers a critique of the socio-political background of the 1980s. The core of the social
predicament of the time is largely conveyed through the two polar-opposite characters of the
their society and the world at large. Karam Younis’ character is filled with contradictions The
father-son relationship depicts two different generations or modes of relation to society and the
world at large. Karam Younis’ character is filled with contradictions representative of the
contradictory age of Anwar El-Sadat’s infitah policy. He is a drug addict who turned his house
into a gambling place and a private brothel to gain easy money. According to him, his actions are
justified by his subjective moral compass which deems virtues as empty slogans whose place is
in theatres and mosques, not reality. However, those who believe in an objective morality such as
Halima and Abbas he calls ‘hypocrites’ for not seeing life as it is: corrupt and unjust. Karam
disapproves of state hypocrisy that sent him to prison for things it runs and allows in secret; he
sees everyone as equally corrupt and it is only a matter of luck to escape condemnation. This
conflict mirrors the political discourse of the time that was immersed in idealistic rhetoric and
underneath there was divisive gap starting a decade earlier following the Six-Day War also
known as Al-Naksah (The Setback) that transformed society as the rich became richer and the
poor became poorer and saw a rampant increase of drugs and prostitution, marking a total
On the other hand, named an ‘angel’ by his mother, Abbas Karam Younis represents
those ideals. He grew up learning morals from literature and theatre and continues to follow the
Nasserist dream of a better world. Despite the setback, he still sings the songs of the revolution.
In contrast to Karam, Abbas genuinely believes in idealistic virtues which are not as relative as
Karam’s and therefore despises his parent’s lifestyle and condemns them in the play he writes.
The play represents Abbas taking control of the narrative as a writer in his fictional world where
Fathy 3
he failed. In this fictional and idealistic world, the one Abbas longs for, all sinners are
Ultimately, Mahfouz not only set his characters within a certain time frame, but he also
told a story that was went beyond the personal and blatantly represented the social and political
climate and its influences on relationships and the life of Egyptians at the time.
Works Cited