Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Carreon, Vanessa Mae C.

BSMT-2

World View

The World View is about Survival in Phase I, with ideals such as


Benefit and Self Preservation and Security. Information is simply data,
where the practice group can work only for basic task assignment and
scheduling at a transactional level. Only I give you what you want, and in
exchange you give me what is due to me, is relationships seen as
transactional. With very little personal sharing or trust, relationships are
very limited.

The world view in Phase II is doing what is needed to belong to the


party. Awareness is data or information packets provided as solutions that
are bundled. By incorporating previous strategies and knowledge to tackle
new challenges, the team succeeds. Except on issues that they feel very
comfortable about, the person will not speak up in a group. This individual
will listen to the needs of a consumer and attempt to find the best product
for them. Out of the question will be a personalized approach. At a personal
level, it will control the relationship to belong, be accepted and realize who is
in charge.

The view of the world in Phase III is more nuanced. It is now


internalized and service-oriented to become self-initiating. Values such as
learning, listening and trust surround it. It is a collaborative point of view.
Awareness is comprehension. The practice culture is distinguished by its
capacity to develop new, imaginative and personalized solutions.
Relationships are also founded on honesty, openness and cooperation.

The world view in Phase IV has to do with Interdependence's global


relationship. Knowledge and Awareness are realistic global knowledge where
partnerships are co-partnering or co-creating a brand new product and
service. The practice group operates at the same degree of innovation and
openness as in Phase III, but works internationally and is most frequently
virtual.

Different ideals underpin all four stages. It is also necessary to note,


however, that individuals working at these levels do so tacitly - they are not
completely aware of how they are doing what they do. The explanation is
that we work on routines and we internalize our beliefs and skills. We now
have a methodology that tests values and can make an individual explicit in
these processes. We are able to choose to work at far higher levels when
this happens. This is especially important for communities of Phase II
practice seeking to transfer the potential to higher levels.

You might also like