Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

TITLE: JIAN’S MODEL

SUBMITTED BY: SUNANA AMJAD

ROLL# 18841

BS ENGLISH 4B (EVENING)

SUBMITTED TO: SIR ASIM KHAN

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MODERN LANGUAGES


Moves Presence of the Move No. of times the Move
appears
Move 1: Establishing a
thematic territory

Strategy 1A: Making topic 1


generalizations

Strategy 1B: Claiming centrality

Strategy 1C: Giving 1


background information

Move 2: Surveying and


summarizing previous
research

Strategy 2A: Constructing 12


reference to the published work

Strategy 2B: Making 2


positive/negative evaluation

Strategy 2C: Making


general/summary statement

Move 3: Creating a research


niche

Strategy 3A: Counter-claiming

Strategy 3B: Gap-indicating 1

Strategy 3C: Question-raising

Strategy 3D: Asserting the


relevancy
Strategy 3E: Establishing
theoretical framework or
position

Move 4: Occupying the


research niche

Strategy 4A: Announcing 1


aims/research questions

Strategy 4B: Announcing


theoretical framework or
position

Strategy 4C: Indicating RA


structure

Article 1

Reporting Verbs in Applied Linguistics Research Articles by Native and Non-native Writers

Qualitative report:

Move 1:

Strategy 1A, 1C:

The author of this article discusses that topic is general. Writer in this article create current
knowledge and experience.

In the following lines author also discusses about background information.

“It is very important to use different means available to improve instructional tools at hand in
order to develop researchers’ academic writing skills”

Move 2:
Strategy 1A:

Many researcher researches on this article:(Baleghizadeh, 2012), McEnery and Xiao (2011),
Hyland (2005), (Thomas & Hawes, 1994) and so on.

Strategy 1B:

This study represents a positive and negative evaluation.

“Hyland (2005) defined reporting verbs as a lexical device which benefits writers in displaying
their stance as well as establishing a connection with readers.”

Move 3:

Strategy 3B:

The research in this article finds gap:

“One issue that needs attention in this area is academic citation in general and the use of
reporting verbs in particular”

Move 4:

Strategy 4A:

The researcher in the very same research describes the aim of article.

“this study aimed to find out whether there is any significant difference between native writers
of English and non-native writers in the use of reporting verbs in research articles in the field
of language teaching and applied linguistics”.
Article: 2

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies

Moves Presence of the Move No. of times the Move


appears
Move 1: Establishing a
thematic territory

Strategy 1A: Making topic


generalizations

Strategy 1B: Claiming centrality 1

Strategy 1C: Giving 1


background information

Move 2: Surveying and


summarizing previous
research

Strategy 2A: Constructing 16


reference to the published work

Strategy 2B: Making 2


positive/negative evaluation

Strategy 2C: Making


general/summary statement

Move 3: Creating a research


niche

Strategy 3A: Counter-claiming

Strategy 3B: Gap-indicating 1

Strategy 3C: Question-raising


Strategy 3D: Asserting the
relevancy

Strategy 3E: Establishing


theoretical framework or
position

Move 4: Occupying the


research niche

Strategy 4A: Announcing 5


aims/research questions

Strategy 4B: Announcing


theoretical framework or
position

Strategy 4C: Indicating RA


structure

Qualitative report:

Move 1:

Strategy 1B, 1C:

The researcher in this article investigates that the article is well established and significant.

The research also presents back ground information:

“the need and benefit of systematic information on the current research trends of a discipline
at both national and international domains attract attention in several domains.”

Move 2:

Strategy 2A:
Many researcher researches on this research name as follows:

(Hsu, 2005), (Chang, Chang, & Tseng, 2010; Lee, Wu & Tsai, 2009; Tsai, & Wen, 2005; White,
1997), Lazaraton (2000), Saito (1999), Cheng & Fox, 2013; Gao, Yanyi &Yuxia, 2014; Motha,
2009; Riazi & Candlin, 2014) and rest.

Strategy 2B:

This article has presents both positive and negative evaluation related to research.

“Educational research literature shows that the research output of Turkish scholars have
constantly been increasing due to probably more stringent requirements on academic output”

Move 3:

Strategy 3B:

The researcher in this article finds gap:

“Some research findings (Cheng & Fox, 2013; Gao, Yanyi &Yuxia, 2014; Motha, 2009; Riazi
& Candlin, 2014) also highlight the increase in the number of mixed research design and the
need of research studies about the methodological issues.”

Move 4:

Strategy 4A:

In this article researcher discusses five research question related to the article:

1. What is the subject distribution of the published articles in terms of years (2005-2015)?

2. What research methods have been employed in the published articles at Turkish context?
(Quantitative-Qualitative-Mixed)

3. What data collection tools have been employed in the published articles at Turkish context?

4. What sample and sample size group have been employed in the published articles at
Turkish context?
5. What type of data analysis procedures have been employed in the published articles at
Turkish context?

Article 3

Informality in Applied Linguistics Research Articles: Comparing Native and


Non-Native Writings

Moves Presence of the Move No. of times the Move


appears
Move 1: Establishing a
thematic territory

Strategy 1A: Making topic 1


generalizations

Strategy 1B: Claiming centrality 1

Strategy 1C: Giving 1


background information

Move 2: Surveying and


summarizing previous
research

Strategy 2A: Constructing 21


reference to the published work

Strategy 2B: Making 3


positive/negative evaluation

Strategy 2C: Making


general/summary statement

Move 3: Creating a research


niche

Strategy 3A: Counter-claiming


Strategy 3B: Gap-indicating 1

Strategy 3C: Question-raising

Strategy 3D: Asserting the


relevancy

Strategy 3E: Establishing


theoretical framework or
position

Move 4: Occupying the


research niche

Strategy 4A: Announcing 2


aims/research questions

Strategy 4B: Announcing


theoretical framework or
position

Strategy 4C: Indicating RA


structure

Qualitative Report:

Move 1:

Strategy 1A, 1B:

The author of this article discusses that topic is general. Writer in this article create current
knowledge and experience. The article is also produce generalization.

“It is assumed that writing is universally and increasingly losing its formality in many realms”
Strategy 1C:

The author also gives background information in this article:

“Academic writing is believed to possess an inclination not to breach the formal writing
etiquette of disinterest and fastidiousness, enabling writers and readers to exude an air of
detachment.”

Move 2:

Strategy 2A:

Many previous researcher researches on this article:

(e.g. Adel, 2008; Fairclough, 2001; Foster, 2005), Mair (1998, p. 153), Fairclough (2001, p. 52),
Atkinson (1999), Hyland and Anan (2006), Heylighen and Dewaele (1999, p. 1) and rest.

Strategy 2B:

The researcher in this research discusses the positive and negative evaluation regarding this
article:

“formal language is delineated in terms of being “very correct and serious rather than relaxed
and friendly” whereas it deals with ‘negative politeness’ in pragmatics and the deployment of
disaffecting behavior to esteem the face of another side and circumvent imposition on the face
their own (Brown & Levinson, 1978)”

Move 3:

Strategy 3B:

In this research article author finds gap:

“One should not, nevertheless, surmise that the gap between academic writing and
conversation is being bridged (Hyland, 2004)”
Move 4:

Strategy 4B:

The researcher in this article also discusses research question that are as follows:

“The questions which shape the premise upon which this study is constructed are as follows:
Are native writers inclined to employ some informality features more intensely and the others
less? How about non-native writers? Can they appropriately conform to native speakers’
writing norms in terms of informality? Do they overuse or underuse informality in general or
some of its specific features in particular?”

You might also like