Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sunana Amjad, Jians Model
Sunana Amjad, Jians Model
ROLL# 18841
BS ENGLISH 4B (EVENING)
Article 1
Reporting Verbs in Applied Linguistics Research Articles by Native and Non-native Writers
Qualitative report:
Move 1:
The author of this article discusses that topic is general. Writer in this article create current
knowledge and experience.
“It is very important to use different means available to improve instructional tools at hand in
order to develop researchers’ academic writing skills”
Move 2:
Strategy 1A:
Many researcher researches on this article:(Baleghizadeh, 2012), McEnery and Xiao (2011),
Hyland (2005), (Thomas & Hawes, 1994) and so on.
Strategy 1B:
“Hyland (2005) defined reporting verbs as a lexical device which benefits writers in displaying
their stance as well as establishing a connection with readers.”
Move 3:
Strategy 3B:
“One issue that needs attention in this area is academic citation in general and the use of
reporting verbs in particular”
Move 4:
Strategy 4A:
The researcher in the very same research describes the aim of article.
“this study aimed to find out whether there is any significant difference between native writers
of English and non-native writers in the use of reporting verbs in research articles in the field
of language teaching and applied linguistics”.
Article: 2
Qualitative report:
Move 1:
The researcher in this article investigates that the article is well established and significant.
“the need and benefit of systematic information on the current research trends of a discipline
at both national and international domains attract attention in several domains.”
Move 2:
Strategy 2A:
Many researcher researches on this research name as follows:
(Hsu, 2005), (Chang, Chang, & Tseng, 2010; Lee, Wu & Tsai, 2009; Tsai, & Wen, 2005; White,
1997), Lazaraton (2000), Saito (1999), Cheng & Fox, 2013; Gao, Yanyi &Yuxia, 2014; Motha,
2009; Riazi & Candlin, 2014) and rest.
Strategy 2B:
This article has presents both positive and negative evaluation related to research.
“Educational research literature shows that the research output of Turkish scholars have
constantly been increasing due to probably more stringent requirements on academic output”
Move 3:
Strategy 3B:
“Some research findings (Cheng & Fox, 2013; Gao, Yanyi &Yuxia, 2014; Motha, 2009; Riazi
& Candlin, 2014) also highlight the increase in the number of mixed research design and the
need of research studies about the methodological issues.”
Move 4:
Strategy 4A:
In this article researcher discusses five research question related to the article:
1. What is the subject distribution of the published articles in terms of years (2005-2015)?
2. What research methods have been employed in the published articles at Turkish context?
(Quantitative-Qualitative-Mixed)
3. What data collection tools have been employed in the published articles at Turkish context?
4. What sample and sample size group have been employed in the published articles at
Turkish context?
5. What type of data analysis procedures have been employed in the published articles at
Turkish context?
Article 3
Qualitative Report:
Move 1:
The author of this article discusses that topic is general. Writer in this article create current
knowledge and experience. The article is also produce generalization.
“It is assumed that writing is universally and increasingly losing its formality in many realms”
Strategy 1C:
“Academic writing is believed to possess an inclination not to breach the formal writing
etiquette of disinterest and fastidiousness, enabling writers and readers to exude an air of
detachment.”
Move 2:
Strategy 2A:
(e.g. Adel, 2008; Fairclough, 2001; Foster, 2005), Mair (1998, p. 153), Fairclough (2001, p. 52),
Atkinson (1999), Hyland and Anan (2006), Heylighen and Dewaele (1999, p. 1) and rest.
Strategy 2B:
The researcher in this research discusses the positive and negative evaluation regarding this
article:
“formal language is delineated in terms of being “very correct and serious rather than relaxed
and friendly” whereas it deals with ‘negative politeness’ in pragmatics and the deployment of
disaffecting behavior to esteem the face of another side and circumvent imposition on the face
their own (Brown & Levinson, 1978)”
Move 3:
Strategy 3B:
“One should not, nevertheless, surmise that the gap between academic writing and
conversation is being bridged (Hyland, 2004)”
Move 4:
Strategy 4B:
The researcher in this article also discusses research question that are as follows:
“The questions which shape the premise upon which this study is constructed are as follows:
Are native writers inclined to employ some informality features more intensely and the others
less? How about non-native writers? Can they appropriately conform to native speakers’
writing norms in terms of informality? Do they overuse or underuse informality in general or
some of its specific features in particular?”