Presentation: CLO 2, CLO 3 & CL0 4 UniKL MICET

CCB 10402 Chemical Engineering Laboratory 1

Group: A / B / C / D Day: Tuesday / Wednesday / Thursday / Friday Date:

Experiment:
Group member: 1. 3.
2. 4.

CLO 2 : Apply the knowledge acquired in previous mathematics, science and chemical engineering courses to conduct
experiments by the operating process requirements.
PLO 1 : Engineering knowledge
0 1 2 3
Criteria Marks
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
There is inadequate There is sufficient Mathematics, science and
There is no evidence that mathematics, science and mathematics, science and engineering theories and
Introduction and mathematics, science and engineering theories and engineering theories and principals are clearly
theory engineering theories and principals to solve the principals to solve the explained and applied to
principals are considered. complex engineering complex engineering solve complex engineering
problem. problem. problem.
Total (a) /3
Total (a) * 4%
/4
3
CLO 3 : Analyze the experimental data obtained from the conducted experiments.
PLO 4 : Investigation
0 1 2 3
Criteria Marks
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
Analysis of data &
Analysis of data & Analysis of data & Analysis of data &
information made towards
Results and information made towards information made towards information made towards
the experiment are
discussion the experiment are limited the experiment are the experiment are
significantly below
and unclear. sufficient. outstanding.
expectation.
Total (b) /3
Total (b) * 8%
/8
3
CLO 4 : Produce and present laboratory reports formatively.
PLO 9 : Communication

Criteria 0 1 2 3 Marks

1|Page January 2019

Presentation: CLO 2, CLO 3 & CL0 4
CCB 10402 Chemical Engineering Laboratory 1
Poor
Lack of preparation and
Professionalism
not presentable.
No visual aids or minimum
Visual aids usage without well-
prepared.
The presenter is totally
uncomfortable throughout
the presentation. The
delivery is awkward, errors
Delivery
in sentence structure are
frequent and the English
used is barely
understandable.
The presenter noticeably
Timing exceeds or falls too short
of the time allocated.
2|Page
Satisfactory
Speak loud and clear,
punctual but low confidence
level.
Few visual aids are used but
sloppy and hard to read.
The presenter appears
uncomfortable and lacking in
confidence during most of
the presentation; there is
little if any, evidence of
organization and
preparation; delivery is
awkward, and errors in
sentence structure are
frequent and the use of
English is barely
comprehendible.
The presenter either rushes
or rambles excessively to
meet the time allocated.
Time frame is
“approximately” met.
Good
Speak loud and clear,
punctual with good self
esteem.
Most visual aids used are
adequate and related.
The presenter appears
comfortable in some parts
of the presentation; there is
some evidence of
organization and
preparation; a few errors in
sentence structure occur
and the use of English is
just comprehensible
The presenter uses time
allocated, but the
presentation is slightly
rushed or delayed.
UniKL MICET
Excellent
Speak with enthusiasm,
punctual with high
confidence level.
The visual aids are good,
related and clear.
The presenter appears
comfortable throughout the
presentation; there is
evidence of organization
and preparation; sentence
structure is correct and
proficiency in the use of
English is demonstrated.
The presenter uses time
allocated and the
presentation is attractively
carried out.
Total (c) / 12
Total (c) * 8%
/8
12
January 2019