Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study 1
Case Study 1
CORE 307
19 February 2019
Brandon Connor was born in Atlanta with a tumor on his spine, and at five weeks old, he
was diagnosed with neuroblastoma. The tumor was first identified in an ultrasound during the
eighth month of gestation, and since spinal cord nerves ran through the tumor, doctors decided to
watch and wait before taking any dramatic action. The tumor was described as high-risk, so a
passive approach to treatment could have potentially led to death. However, there was also a
high risk of paralysis involved with operating close to Brandon’s spinal cord. Thus, Brandon’s
parents did not immediately jump on the option of surgically removing Brandon’s tumor. At the
age of 2, Brandon began experiencing an inexplicable fever and abdominal pains for three
weeks, so his parents finally decided that Brandon should undergo surgery to remove the tumor.
The family quickly flew out to San Francisco for Brandon to be operated on by a world-
renowned neurosurgeon. During the final MRI just before Brandon’s scheduled surgery,
however, the doctors were surprised to find that Brandon’s tumor had spontaneously
disappeared; not only that, but healthy, fatty tissue was found where the tumor once was located.
Brandon’s parents were relieved, and his mother declared that a miracle had happened.
understand the context of this incident, before a case can be made as to whether or not Brandon’s
mother was warranted in describing this as a miracle. Neuroblastoma is a type of cancer that
Reiskytl 2
affects immature or developing nerve cells anywhere along the sympathetic nervous system,
most often found in an embryo or fetus (American Cancer Society). Treatment of neuroblastoma
often varies depending on the risk group that the child is in, and may involve chemotherapy,
surgery, radiation therapy (low risk), a combination of these forms of treatment (intermediate
risk), or more aggressive treatment involving chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, stem cell
transplant, immunotherapy, and retinoid therapy (high risk). News reports suggested that in such
conditions, the tumor “has been known to vanish spontaneously in as many as 10 percent of
cases,” (CNN) which is in line with the American Cancer Society’s explanation that some
children categorized as low risk may not need treatment since some neuroblastoma cases
This case study raises the question of whether or not Brandon’s mother was warranted in
describing this event as a miracle. As such, it is necessary to first lay down an understanding of
what defines a miracle, and therefore whether or not the premises of this case fit the criteria of a
miracle. In the event that this case is considered a miracle, it must be determined on what basis
this argument is made, such as possible divine intervention or the occurrence of supernatural
elements or processes. Did Brandon have neuroblastoma in the first place? How did his tumor
disappear? Is there a scientific explanation for the disappearance of his tumor? What was the role
of God in all of this? These are the kinds of questions that we will address in this paper.
We believe that the healing described in this case study was indeed a miracle–namely, a
conversion miracle in which cancerous cells were converted to fatty tissue. We recognize that
statistically, neuroblastomas disappear spontaneously in ten percent of cases, and such high
frequency may lead many, as it did us initially, to believe that this incident is too common to be
to the Oxford dictionary, a miracle is “a surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by
natural or scientific laws and is therefore considered to be the work of a divine agency”
(“Miracle”). Based on this definition, we have modified our position and concluded that the
disappearance of Brandon’s tumor can indeed be considered a miracle. This is because what
happened in Brandon’s body left even the most expert doctors shocked (CNN) and therefore
cannot be explained “by natural or scientific laws” and as such, points to the work of divine
agency. Drawing on the options presented in the case study assignment sheet, we believe that
this is a miracle because it “is simply the sort of thing that God would do but not the sort of thing
we have come to expect of natural processes.” We believe that this is God’s doing because of His
nature and character revealed in Scripture as being our Healer. Jesus Christ, the ultimate, most
tangible expression of God’s nature, supernaturally healed many physical ailments during his
ministry on Earth, as recorded in the Gospels. To the skeptic, supernatural healings may sound
like foolishness, but as Christians, we believe in what Jesus said in Mark 10:27 that “with man
this is impossible, but not with God; all things are possible with God” (NIV). Thus, we can
indeed label Brandon’s healing as miracle performed by God, since it is very much in line with
Brandon’s spontaneous healing is not the sort of thing that we have come to expect from
natural processes. Current medical knowledge cannot explain the disappearance of the tumor.
Nevertheless, we recognize that a scientific explanation for Brandon’s healing is not impossible,
in the sense that future medical research could eventually discover a scientific explanation for the
explanation for why Brandon’s tumor vanished. The fact that not only the tumor was gone but
Reiskytl 4
fatty tissue was found in its place suggests that God miraculously converted the cancerous cells
Through the presentations of other groups and our own presentation of our argument to
the class, we have identified several key rebuttals to our argument that we would like to address.
For one, a possible objection to our argument is the possibility that the doctors misdiagnosed
Brandon’s condition, and that he never had neuroblastoma in the first place. We would respond
by saying that there is not much evidence to support this assertion, and thus, it is highly unlikely.
The doctors first detected and diagnosed Brandon with neuroblastoma while he was still in his
mother’s womb during an ultrasound. Not only that, but “Brandon had occasional bugs and
stomachaches” (Free Republic) that were attributed to the cancer, as well as a very intense fever
right before his parents sought emergency surgery. Furthermore, Dr. Bradley George was
“shocked” to hear that the tumor disappeared and asserted that Brandon did indeed once have
neuroblastoma “because of the way the tumor acted and its location” (Free Republic). All of this
disappear in 10% of cases, it may have been a natural, biological process and not a miracle. We
would argue that a miracle is not defined by the frequency or probability that an event occurs as
much as the fact that it defies the natural laws of science as we know it. Just because something
happens more than once does not disqualify it from being a miracle. Even if a certain event
by science, then it is still a miracle, according to the way that our understanding of the definition
of a miracle.
Reiskytl 5
An additional objection to our argument is that it employs the “God of the Gaps” mode of
thinking. This is a slighting term used to refer to when people rush to explain surprising
phenomenon by saying that God miraculously did it. To this objection we would respond that
there is indeed wisdom in looking for natural, scientific explanations before jumping to the
conclusion that God must have miraculously done something because this could potentially be
harmful to the Christian’s witness if a natural explanation is found. However, when there is no
apparent human, scientific answer to a surprising and welcome event, then Christians have good
reason to testify to the power, goodness, and glory of God. We believe that if Christians become
too hesitant to give God glory for an apparent miracle, then they run the risk of trying to look for
a rational, scientific explanation for everything instead of believing by faith that God is indeed
more than capable of the supernatural. We do not know with absolute certainty whether God
used natural or supernatural means to heal Brandon; what we do know is that regardless of the
means that He used, God is always in control and is constantly holding everything together. If a
scientific, biological explanation for Brandon’s healing were to be discovered, then we would
not consider this a miracle. However, this would not jeopardize our faith, because we believe that
God works through natural means as well as supernatural means. Nevertheless, we maintain that
In conclusion, whether one sees Brandon’s healing as miraculous or not largely depends
on one’s definition of a miracle. In this paper, we have accepted the definition of a miracle as a
welcome event that cannot be explained by science and therefore is attributed to God. Reports
have suggested that Brandon’s tumor disappeared inexplicably. Although this is known to
happen around 10% of the time, which makes it fairly common, we define this healing as a
Works Cited
www.cancer.org/cancer/neuroblastoma.html.
Anderson, Virginia. 'It's Just a Miracle' - On Eve of Surgery, Child's Deadly Tumor Vanishes.
news/1020721/posts.
www.cnn.com/2003/US/11/14/wbr.toddler.tumor/.
The Holy Bible New International Version, Containing the Old and New Testaments.