SUBJECT: INTERPRETATION OF STATUES AND PRINCIPLES OF LEGISLATION ( DE OT REGISTRATI ‘ONNO ASSIGNMENT TOPIC ‘azat60s0T79 | 6 Expansive inerpretaton o fer Article 21 ofthe Constitution of India 02876080003 4 Ta102508 0367 he 183rdLaw Commission Report on External Aids of intro (04076060108 40 ¥B102508 0389 Rule of Exclusion with Special Reference to PEPPER V., HART (1993) 1 ALLER 42 (HL) TO2T9060507 __85 ‘os3iZ050102 99 Te102508 0421 19102504 0388 International Conventions as an Exteral Aid to Interpretation of Slatutes. Interpretation of defintion of "heinous ofences" u/s 2(33) of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 TO2TOOEDEOT 68 79102604 0406: Presumption as to Constitutional of Statues with reference to relevant Supreme Court decisions, *FORTe060S0T 69 FB102505 0407 Interpretation of Penal statutes TORTS06OSOT 7 78102508 0410 State of Bombay v. F.N, Balsara AIR 1951 SC 318: Discuss 0219060607 7 5102508 0413 Importance ofthe Preamble in the Interpretation of the Constitution of india To2I9060607 TOR060501 88 49102508 | 0415 7102504 0423) Harmonious Consiruction ofthe Const interpretation of TOzi9060507 4 Tet02504 0429) ‘Statute asthe il ‘with special reference to law ~ making procedure in India, 1776050100 T9102504 440. Jurisprudenal Analysis ofthe Principles of lgisation -FB102504 0441 Significance of the Interpretation Clause in the interpretation of statutes DiBTEOsDTas To102508 0371 7102508 The Signcance ofthe General Clauses Actin the interpretation of statutes Principles of Legislation with special reference to bentham's theory | ozer0s0i14 10 Importance of Preamble inthe interpretation ofthe Consiution of India inthe light of Keshavanda Bharat case 524050210 a 8102508 0391 Explain Literal Rule as a Primary Rule of St 9173050200 08 Ta102508 0398 ‘A Ciiical Analysis of Golden Rute of interpretation as adopted in Grey v, Pearson, in the Indian context TORTOOGOSTT 65 To102508 0403 Explain Ejusdem Generis in light of decided case lave10219060501 76 19102504 o4t2 TAOIST | 18102504 78 o4tg Use of Harmonious Construction in the Interpretation of the Const Mischief Rule of interpretation as propounded in HEYDON'S CASE TORTSOETSOT 9 25-2200 ‘0rTS0e0101 38 Te102508 O34 102504 0443 ¥e102504 0372 Doctrine of Colourable legislation with reference fo K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa Presumption relating f jurisdiction inthe ight of Doctrine of TERRITORIAL NEXUS Doctrine of Repugnancy with reference to Article 254 of the Indian Constitution Ons T6050T20 8102504 0385, Distinction between Doctine of Repugnancy and Doctrine of occupied field 19102504 0302 ‘The Role of Constituent Assembly Debates inthe inte interpretation ofthe Constituion 5216060120 60 05376080123 48 79102604 0393 T9102604 394 Citcal Analysis of delegatus non potest delegare”in ight of decided case laws. Role of Parliamentary OreTeDSOTOT 87 Ta102604 0397 Role of Fereign Decisions inthe Interpretation of statutes | Toatgo6os0t TOT1S060301 2 at | to2i908060t | 82 TOZT050607 87 TR102504 0399 B102505 o4t7 78102508 0418 [2 || ote 7910250 | 0422 Genetia Specialious non derogant Discuss with ference to relevant cases if rule of interpretation with reference to Smith v. Huges, 1960 WLR 830 TOZT9080507 si 7102508 Bengal Immunity Co, v. State of Bihar, AIR I955 SC 661: Discuss TOXT9060507 96 TOzis060507 aoe 210060502 4B T102504 0431 7102508 0433 102508 0438 Interpretation Of Beneficial Statutes Shilpa Mia v. State of NCT of Delhi 8Ors., AIR 2020 SC 406: Discuss Use of Non abstante Clause in the Interpretation of statutes 10268 Ta102508 0438 Statutes in pari material as an External Ald to interpretation 0474050102 95 aori2050102 Te102508 _ 0373 102504 a74 Doctrine of Occupied Field with reference to decided cases Interpretation of OTBTS050100 43 To102508 0375: Presumption as to Prospecve Operation of statutes.o1gisosott2 40 ‘2976080706 7 49102504 os77_| i9t02s04 0386 Classification of Statutes Expiry and Repeal of Statutes HBTeOSOTTS 25 7e102504 0300 Presumption in Statutes (06818080207 5 Te102508 0398 Interpretation of International Conventions & Treaties 7076050202 2 70219080801 70 9102608 o4or | 19102604 408 Interpretation of Taxing Statutes Importance of Provsos, Exceptions, Exclamations and savings clauses in statutes TOEROSTSOT | 74 ToH02508 ott Interpretation of Procedural Statutes TORIS060501 83 *Ozi8060507 ‘10219060501 90 78102604 ‘418 9102604 424 19102604 0425: The Rule of Noscitor a Socis ACRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN ON R.M.D.C. V, UNION OF INDIA, AIR 1957 SC 628 ‘4 STUDY ON NEED FOR DILUTION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE OF PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES TORISO6050T THTOREOF 0477 AN ANALYSIS ON BENGAL IMMUNITY CO. V. STATE OF BIHAR, AIR 1965 SC 661 "10219060501 7 ToD Te0e0602 a 5102508 ae 7102508 0437 EFFECT OF CHANGING CRININAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE INTERPRETATION OF PENAL STATUTES: AN ANALYSIS INTERPRETATION OF LITERAL RULE IN RAMAVATAR BUDHI PRASHAD V. ASSISTANT SALES TAX OFFICER AIR 1961 SC 1325 56 fT 58 18-1780 79-0011 j2i9060s02 2 Te102504 0442 ¥9102508 0445 9102508 0488 MALIMATH COMMITTEE REPORT, 2003: AN ANALYSIS. PRESUMPTION RELATING TO JURISDICTION VIS -A- VIS DOCTRINE OF TERRITORIAL NEXUS. USE OF DEFINITION CLAUSES IN VARIOUS LEGISLATIONS: NATURE AND INTERPRETATIVE ROLE 59 TOzTa080800 4 5102505 0815, USE OF GENERAL CLAUSES ACT 1897 IN THE INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE. 60 DigTE0sOTT6 8102508 0379 *a102508 0360 ‘ANALYSE THE REASON FOR THE NON APPLICATION OF THE GOLDEN RULE OF INTERPRETATION IN THE DOMINION OF INDIA B.ANR VS. SHRINBAI A, IRANI & ANR [1954] INSC 66 (14 MAY 1954) ANALYSE THE RULES OF INTERPRETATION APPLIED BY THE COURT IN THE FAMOUS CASE OF KESAVANANDA BHARTI V. STATEOFKERALAAIRIS73SCMS1 02918050111 38 (06812502002 4 19102508 0362 WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CALCUTTA GAS COMPANY V. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS, 1952 AIR 1044, ANALYSE THE RULE OF HARMONIOUS CONSTRUCTION 19102504 | 0395 ‘ANALYSE THE ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SANT RAM VS RAJINDER LAL AND ORS, 1978 AIR 1601 _6050202 | 19102504 48102508 402 {9060801 | 19102504 | cally analyse the doctine of several D409 | Citialy analyse the doc of severity | Fet02508 0416 Te102508 0420) Analyse the rue of Colourable legislation as applied by the Indian courts Analyse the rule of ejusdem generis Explain the doctinme of pir And substance wi leaDING JUD‘ | Residuary powers ‘9050802 ot S| weer 0 | seat | ST | Genesco uMNSESTERCLUSO ATERUS TET] TEST reg 101 | 19102504 | Tie RULE OF REDDENDO SINGULA SINGL ‘anole on the sarkaris commission report