Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IFRS 15 vs. IAS 18: Huge Change Is Here!: Ifrs Accounting Most Popular Revenue Recognition 305
IFRS 15 vs. IAS 18: Huge Change Is Here!: Ifrs Accounting Most Popular Revenue Recognition 305
by Silvia
When to recognize revenue? This simple question is one of the most controversial issues in today’s
accounting.
Why?
Well, it’s simple and easy when you sell goods, but how about long-term contracts or some sort of
services?
You need to have some rules on WHEN to recognize the revenue from all these things, because all your
profits and losses, your reputation in front of the outside world and your taxes depend on this.
Revenue recognition rules have just changed and later in this article, you’ll find an example showing you
the impact of this change.
Until now, revenue recognition was exactly one of the biggest gaps between IFRS and US GAAP.
As you know, IAS 18 Revenue contains principles for revenue recognition, but they are quite broad and
as a result, many companies use their judgment to apply them in their specific situation. Some
companies even developed their own IFRS policies based on the US GAAP rules.
Opposed to IFRS, US GAAP guidance about revenues is very detailed – US GAAP contains about 100
separate documents and protocols about revenue recognition in specific areas (often conflicting, by the
way).
Finally, these 2 standards came closer and tried to solve all these differences on 28 May 2014.
New revenue recognition standard was issued: IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and it
should fill the gap between IFRS and US GAAP.
FASB (the US GAAP standard setting body) issued the new revenue recognition standard, too: Topic 606,
which is almost a mirror of IFRS 15 (full text of Topic 606 is here).
Although I’ll cover this standard in one of my videos in the following months, here are the basic points
for your information:
IAS 18 Revenue,
o The core principle of IFRS 15 is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration (payment) to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those
goods or services.
To apply this principle, you need to follow a five-step model framework described below.
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning package with more
than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies solved in Excel, more than 180
pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take action today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit,
you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it out!
Every company must follow the five-step model in order to comply with IFRS 15. We’ll not go into
details, just let me brief you a bit:
IFRS 15 defines a contract as an agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights
and obligations and sets out the criteria for every contract that must be met.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a good or service to the
customer.
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. For a
contract that has more than one performance obligation, an entity should allocate the
transaction price to each performance obligation in an amount that depicts the amount of
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for satisfying each
performance obligation.
Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Who Will Feel the Biggest Impact of IFRS 15?
The experts say that the most impacted industries are telecom, software development, real estate and
other industries with long-term contracts.
If you work in an industry where bundled contracts of “product + service” are quite common, then you
should pay attention.
I’m referring mainly to software development or telecommunications, where customers usually buy a
prepayment plans with a handset or software development comes with implementation and post-
delivery service in 1 package, or any similar arrangements.
Under the new model, companies in telecom and software will probably recognize revenue earlier than
under older rules.
Why is that?
Well, because under new IFRS 15, the transaction price must be allocated to the individual
performance obligations in the contract and recognized when these obligations are delivered or fulfilled.
It means that under new IFRS 15, telecom operator must allocate a part of the revenue from
prepayment plan with free handset to the sale of handset, too.
Under IAS 18, the revenue is defined as a gross inflow of economic benefits arising from ordinary
operating activities of an entity.
It means that if the operator gives a handset for free with the prepayment plan, then the revenue from
handset is 0.
Johnny enters into a 12-month telecom plan with the local mobile operator ABC. The terms of plan are
as follows:
ABC sells the same handsets for CU 300 and the same monthly prepayment plans without handset for
CU 80/month.
How should ABC recognize the revenues from this plan in line with IAS 18 and IFRS 15?
OK, let’s ignore a couple of things here, like a price of a SIM kit, or the situations when Johnny hangs on
the phone for hours and spends some minutes in excess of his plan. Let’s focus just on these 2 things.
Revenue under IAS 18
Current rules of IAS 18 say that ABC should apply the recognition criteria to the separately identifiable
components of a single transaction (here: handset + monthly plan).
However, IAS 18 does not give any guidance on how to identify these components and how to allocate
selling price and as a result, there were different practices applied.
For example, telecom companies recognized revenue from the sale of monthly plans in full as the
service was provided, and no revenue for handset – they treated the cost of handset as the cost of
acquiring the customer.
Some companies identified these components, but then limited the revenue allocated to the sale of
handset to the amount received from customer (zero in this case). This is a certain form of a residual
method (based on US GAAP’s cash cap method).
For the simplicity, let’s assume that ABC recognizes no revenue from the sale of handset, because ABC
gives it away for free. The cost of handset is recognized to profit or loss and effectively, ABC treats that
as a cost of acquiring new customer.
Revenue from monthly plan is recognized on a monthly basis. The journal entry is to debit receivables or
cash and credit revenues with CU 100.
Under new rules in IFRS 15, ABC needs to identify the contract first (step 1), which is obvious here as
there’s a clear 12-month plan with Johnny.
Then, ABC needs to identify all performance obligations from the contract with Johnny (step 2 in a 5-
step model):
The transaction price (step 3) is CU 1 200, calculated as monthly fee of CU 100 times 12 months.
Now, ABC needs to allocate that transaction price of CU 1 200 to individual performance obligations
under the contract based on their relative stand-alone selling prices (or their estimates) – this is step 4.
I made it really simple for you here, so let’s do it in the following table:
960.00
Network services 76.2% 914.40
(=80*12)
The step 5 is to recognize the revenue when ABC satisfies the performance obligations. Therefore:
When ABC provides network services to Johnny, it needs to recognize the total
revenue of CU 914.40. It’s practical to do it once per month as the billing
happens.
So as you can see, Johnny effectively pays not only for network services, but also for his handset.
The biggest impact of the new standard is that the companies will report profits in a different way
and profit reporting patterns will change.
In our telecom example, ABC reported loss in the beginning of the contract and then steady profits
under IAS 18, because they recognized the revenue in line with the invoicing to customers.
Under IFRS 15, ABC’s reported profits are the same in total, but their pattern over time is different.
Well, because some contracts surpass one accounting period. They are long-term and reporting
revenues in incorrect accounting periods might cause wrong taxation, different reporting to stock
exchange and other things, too.
Just look at ABC. Let’s say that contract started on 1 July 20X1 and ABC’s financial year-end is 31
December 20X1. Just look how much profits ABC reports from the same contract with Johnny under IAS
18 and IFRS 15 in the year 20X1:
Performance
Under IAS 18 Under IFRS 15
obligation
I really do think that IFRS 15 is a huge change and it requires a massive amount of work not only from
accountants, but also from IT departments, tax people and maybe other departments in your company,
too.
Your profit reporting will depend on the specific contract terms. If your company has a number of
different types of contracts, you need to assess each type separately and decide how to deal with that
type in line with IFRS 15.
OK, how many customers does the “average” telecom company have?How many contracts are there?
And once you decide how to recognize revenue for each type of contract that you have, then you need
to implement this accounting process into your accounting software or system.
Whether you realize it or not, the implementation of IFRS 15 will cost affected companies significant
amount of money for system upgrades, consultants, training the employees and other related activities.
That’s why IFRS 15 must be implemented starting 1 January 2018 – some time is left for making these
changes.
I did not want to scare you in my previous point, but this is going to be a bit scary:All companies need to
look back and recalculate profits and revenue reporting from all contracts.
When you apply IFRS 15, you need to apply it as the new rules have always been in place, that is
retrospectively.
Let’s say that Johnny and ABC enter into 2-year plan on 1 July 2015 and IFRS 15 has not applied yet; thus
ABC recognized zero revenue for handset and monthly revenues from network services in line with the
billing.
On 1 January 2017, ABC will apply IFRS 15 and contract with Johnny is still open (it expires on 30 June
2017). ABC needs to perform all the calculations as shown above and adjust opening balances related to
the contract.
Companies will need to gather lots of numbers, fair values, estimates, stand-alone selling prices and
other things and then perform lots of recalculations and adjustments.
Just imagine you work in a construction of real estate and you’re affected by IFRS 15. Some contracts
run for 10 or 15 years … OK, I finish here and leave it to your imagination.
UPDATE 2018: I have written few articles about IFRS 15 and you can check them out here:
Short summary of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (with video)
Now, I’d really love to hear your view. Do you think IFRS 15 will hit you hard? Are you making your plans
to adopt or implement it? Please leave a comment below and if you liked reading this article, share it
with your friends here.