Luke worked as an assistant to a big Los Angeles-based company.

The company produces

trucks and other advertising items for specialist purposes. To boost the promotional sales
process, the publisher’s cut must be taken. According to the rules, Luke does not exchange
the details with anyone else from the trailers. In compliance with the regulation, exchanging
the movies with others was immoral and this would lead to a severe legal situation. But one
of his buddies leaked the trailer and it created an Internet rift. In compliance with the policy
of the organization, the exchange of filmed knowledge with third parties was not
recommended.

The secrecy material reveals the specifics of the activities or the items the participants need to
do. According to the resolution, a member should not exchange film details with someone
else because, should this be done, it will be a legal issue. The rule specified that
representatives could purposely or accidentally exchange no details with the third party, and
it could be immoral. The members had to comply with the privacy arrangement signed with
the participant.

Yes, without Luke's consideration it was incorrect to reveal information or the trailer's details.
In compliance with the policy of the Organization, it was not advised to deliberately or
accidentally share the details on film trailers, just as it could impact the general purpose of
delivering the trailers. This act was false even though the actual trailer improved the movie's
advertising. The employee signed a protocol in which information could not be transmitted to
anyone and it was not complied with. It is completely unavailable for Luke's siblings to
unload their trailer because a data change occurs as confidential data are revealed to
unapproved individuals or meetings. Every shallow production of news sources indicates that
tragically there is a troubling repetition of information spillage. When the data on risk
arrangements or confidential statistics were scattered, the company could incur a massive loss
of profits. In general data breaks do not legitly interfere with your business; in any case, the
impacts are always daunting. The spill of consumer data in the business center will damage
your company's credibility. For potential buyers, work with you is problematic or personal
data is exposed to your business.

Luke exchanged knowledge from a device such as a password and the user id with a third
party, according to the protocol. This was the possible explanation why trailer details were
deleted and shared on the Internet. In this situation, it should be noted that Luke could be
sued because it refused to conform to the company's legal practices and policies. It gives the
open area and its members a wrong view of the company as well. A critical exam should be
carried out to decide whether it is necessary to suspend the delegate to discourage further
publishing of information or whether different steps could be introduced for temporarily
confining the access. If a formal disciplinary hearing is held, a disciplinary consent that is
sensitive will be coerced under any circumstances. This help would not only remove the
spillage of information by individual staff but also prevent those from performing a
comparable operation in the future.
The leakage of trailer details has had a positive effect on the group. This raised people's
interest and provided the film with indirect advertising. It wouldn't be inaccurate to claim that
the leakage from the trailer helped both the business and the movie, while the entire process
was inappropriate and inappropriate. People visited the website several times after seeing the
teaser and intended to obtain information about the movie, and this was the basis for
marketing the movie effectively and correctly.