Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 Fadhil Unitbv
10 Fadhil Unitbv
Series II: Forestry • Wood Industry • Agricultural Food Engineering • Vol. 13(62) No. 2 – 2020
https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2020.13.62.2.10
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to perform the sensory assessment
of sauerkraut after a seven-day fermentation with various salt
concentrations by using a non-numerical approach based on multi-criteria
and multi-person aggregation. The criteria of sensory assessment included
flavour, colour, taste, texture, and overall acceptance with a salt
concentration variation of: 2.25% (alternative 1), 2.50% (alternative 2),
7.50% (alternative 3) and 12.50% (alternative 4). The study results showed
that the sensory assessment using a non-numerical approach based on
multi-criteria and multi-person aggregation had successfully determined the
best decision from various material treatment alternatives. The best decision
according to people’s acceptance was the sauerkraut with a 2.25% salt
concentration (alternative 1) and 2.50% salt concentration (alternative 2)
with a ‘like slightly’ (LS) decision, while the sauerkraut with a 7.50% salt
concentration (alternative 3) or the one with a 12.50% salt concentration
(alternative 4) were ‘neither like nor dislike’ (NT). Overall, it shows that the
salt concentration variation in sauerkraut resulted in different acceptance
patterns based on sensory assessment.
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Jalan Teungku Hasan Krueng Kalee No 3
Darussalam 23111 Banda Aceh, Indonesia;
2 Laboratory of Postharvest Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia;
used. The addition of salt and pepper was b. Two college students who like to eat
done by smearing them on cabbage slices, sauerkraut
after that the cabbage slices were stirred c. Two college students who like to eat
until even, and they were placed in a pickles (similar to sauerkraut).
transparent glass jar while pressing them
until compact. The jar was tightly sealed
Table 1
until air-tight and fermented for 7 days in
Linguistic assessment scale
an ambient temperature of 20 – 25oC.
For the sensory assessment of Sauerkraut Scale Information Abbreviation
after a seven-day fermentation with salt 1 Like very much LV
concentration variations, a non-numerical 2 Like moderately LM
approach based on multi-criteria and multi- 3 Like slightly LS
person aggregation was used. The sensory Neither like nor
assessment criteria included flavour, colour, 4 NT
dislike
taste, texture, and overall acceptance of 5 Dislike slightly DS
each alternative of sauerkraut assessed.
6 Dislike moderately DM
The linguistic scale of sauerkraut
7 Dislike very much DV
assessment is illustrated in Table 1, while
the criteria importance level is scored based
on the scale illustrated in Table 2. The steps Table 2
of a non-numerical method based on multi- Criteria importance level
criteria and multi-person aggregation are
Scale Information Abbreviation
displayed in Figure 1.
1 Very high LV
The people whose opinions were
recorded in this assessment were 7 2 High LM
people, namely: 3 Neither like nor dislike NT
a. Three Universitas Syiah Kuala 4 Low DM
lecturers who once lived in Germany 5 Very low DV
and consumed sauerkraut
114 Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov • Series II • Vol. 13(62) No. 2 – 2020
(1)
where:
Neg (Wk) is the score negation of
criteria k;
k - index;
q - scale amount.
(2)
where:
Vij is the score of alternative i by person
j;
Vij (ak) - score of alternative i by person j
on criteria k;
K - 1, 2, …., m.
(3)
where:
Qk is the score k;
Int - integer;
R - number of assessors.
(4)
where:
Fig. 1. Non-numeric steps based on Vi is the total score for alternative I;
multi-steps based on multi-criteria and Qi - score j;
multi-person aggregation J - 1, 2, …, m;
R. FADHIL et al.: Sensory Assessment of Sauerkraut Using a Non-Numeric Approach … 115
bj - order from the biggest alternative that it resulted from the calculation of
score i from alternative score j. each alternative as follows:
a. Alternative 1 (2.25 % salt) = LM, LS, LS,
3. Results and Discussion LS, LS, LS, LS;
b. Alternative 2 (2.50 % salt) = LS, LS, LS,
In the first step, a calculation was done NT, LM, LS, LS;
for the negation value of each criterium c. Alternative 3 (7.75 % salt) = LS, NT, NT,
importance level by using formula (1), so NT, LS, NT, NT;
that it resulted from the negation of the d. Alternative 4 (12,50 % salt) = NT, DS,
criteria score based on each index. A NT, NT, NT, NT, NT.
result of the calculation of the negation of
the criteria importance level is as 3.2. Person Aggregation
presented in Table 3. Next, all sensory
assessment from each person is tabulated After that, before calculating person
as seen in Table 4. aggregation by using formula (4), the
calculation of each score was done in
3.1. Criteria Aggregation advance by using formula (3), so that it
resulted from the calculation as follows:
Based on assessor opinion, the The score for Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6,
aggregation criteria for each alternative Q7 respectively = DM, DS, NT, NT, LS, LM,
was calculated by using formula (2), so LV.
Table 4
Criteria of assessment by each person of all alternatives
Criteria
Person Alternative
Flavour Colour Taste Texture Overall Acceptance
K1 LV LV LM LS LM
K2 LV LV LS LM LV
P1
K3 LV LM LS LM LM
K4 LS LM NT LM LS
K1 LM LM LS LM LS
K2 LS LS LS LM LS
P2
K3 NT NT DS LM NT
K4 LS DS DS LS NT
P3 K1 LV LM LS LV LM
116 Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov • Series II • Vol. 13(62) No. 2 – 2020
Criteria
Person Alternative
Flavour Colour Taste Texture Overall Acceptance
K2 LV LM LS LM LM
K3 NT NT DS LM NT
K4 NT LS NT LM LS
K1 LM LV LS LS LS
K2 LM LM NT LM LM
P4
K3 LS LS NT LM NT
K4 LM LS NT LS NT
K1 LV LS LS LV LS
K2 LM LM LM LV LM
P5
K3 LV LS LS LM LS
K4 LV LS NT LS NT
K1 LM LS LS LM LM
K2 LM LS LS LM LS
P6
K3 LM NT NT LM LS
K4 LS LS NT LS LS
K1 LV LM LS LM LM
K2 LV LS LM LM LS
P7
K3 LM NT LS LS NT
K4 LS NT NT LS NT
The result of person aggregation for [7], [17]. It has been demonstrated by the
each alternative by using formula (4) was: calculation result of the sensory assessment
a. Alternative 1 (2.25 % salt) = LS; of sauerkraut that has been performed in
b. Alternative 2 (2.50 % salt) = LS; this study. An assessment like this is indeed
c. Alternative 3 (7.75 % salt) = NT; easier and quicker so that the decision to
d. Alternative 4 (12,50 % salt) = NT. develop or to review furthermore can
According to the sensory assessment of consider both product types that were
sauerkraut with various alternative salt chosen as best products (Like slightly/LS).
concentrations, it shows that alternative 1 However, this study is still limited on
and alternative 2 were more acceptable sensory assessment to determine the best
with ‘Like Slightly’ (LS) decision, while decision from various alternative decisions.
alternative 3 and alternative 4 resulted in The chance for further development is still
the ‘Neither like nor dislike’ (NT) decision. wide open, particularly one that is related to
Therefore, the salt concentration that is very the necessity of making the comparison by
recommended for sauerkraut, especially for using other methods, such as a statistic test
the consumers in Indonesia, is of 2.25% to or similar multi-criteria decision making, so
2.50%, as resulted from the sensory that the significant difference between one
assessment conducted in this study. and another method can be studied.
The sensory assessment on sauerkraut
by using a non-numerical approach based 4. Conclusions
on multi-criteria and multi-person
aggregation became one of the methods Sensory assessment using a non-
that can be used in making a decision [3, 4], numerical approach based on multi-
R. FADHIL et al.: Sensory Assessment of Sauerkraut Using a Non-Numeric Approach … 117
criteria and multi-person aggregation has 3. Fadhil R., Nurba D., 2018. Penilaian
successfully determined the best variant Organoleptik Keripik Ubi Jalar Ungu
from various alternatives of material (Ipomoea batatas L.) Pasca
treatment. Based on person acceptance, it Penggorengan Menggunakan Metode
was obtained that the best variants were Non-Numeric MP-MCDM
sauerkraut with a salt concentration of (Organoleptic evaluation of post-frying
2.25% (alternative 1) and of 2.50% purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas
(alternative 2) with the “like slightly” (LS) L.) using non-numeric MP-MCDM). In:
qualification, while sauerkraut with a salt Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian, vol. 6(2),
concentration of 7.50% (alternative 3) and pp. 165-170.
of 12.50% (alternative 4) was qualified as 4. Hayun A., Machfud, Suryani A.,
“neither like nor dislike” (NT). The salt Sutrisno, 2013. Model Kebijakan
concentration difference in sauerkraut Teknologi Dalam Menghadapi
sensory assessment showed different Perubahan Iklim Technology
levels of acceptance so that the decision (Technology policy model in dealing
resulting from this assessment has led to with climate change). In: Journal
the recommendation to choose the Teknologi Industri Pertanian, vol. 23(2),
sauerkraut with the most liked salt pp. 77-93.
concentration. 5. Hovanov N., Yudaeva M., Hovanov K.,
2009. Multicriteria estimation of
Acknowledgements probabilities on basis of expert non-
numeric, non-exact and non-complete
To our beloved mother, father, knowledge. In: European Journal of
wife/husband, and big family may Allah Operational Research, vol. 195(3),
subhaanahu wata’aala ( )ﷻalways gather us pp. 857-863.
together in goodness and reunite us in His 6. Jaya R., Machfud M., Ismail M. et al.,
Jannah (heaven) later. O Allah, let our love, 2013. Aplikasi teknik ISM dan ME-
and the love of people who love each other MCDM untuk identifikasi posisi
because of You, be eternally in Your way. pemangku kepentingan dan alternatif
kegiatan untuk perbaikan mutu kopi
References Gayo (Aplication of ISM and ME-
MCDM techniques for the
1. Agell N., Sánchez M., Prats F. et al., identification of stakeholders position
2012. Ranking multi-attribute and activity alternatives to improve
alternatives on the basis of linguistic quality of Gayo coffee). In: Jurnal
labels in group decisions. In: Teknologi Industri Pertanian,
Information Sciences, vol. 209, vol. 21(1), pp. 1-8.
pp. 49-60. 7. Nurhasanah N., 2006. Penentuan
2. Chauhan N., Chandra S., Singh J. et al., prioritas alternatif kebijakan sistem
2008. Effect of salt concentration on produksi berdasarkan pendekatan
sensory quality of sauerkraut. In: non-numeric multiexperts
Environment and Ecology, vol. 26(4C), multicriteria decision making: Studi
pp. 2308-2310. kasus PT X (Determination of policy
alternative priority of production
118 Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov • Series II • Vol. 13(62) No. 2 – 2020