Professional Documents
Culture Documents
00 - End Term Combined
00 - End Term Combined
Manufacturing Enterprises Investment in Plant and Investment in Plant and Investment in Plant and
and Enterprises rendering Machinery or Equipment: Machinery or Equipment: Machinery or Equipment:
Services
Not more than Rs.1 crore and Not more than Rs.10 crore and Not more than Rs.50 crore and
Annual Turnover ; not more than Annual Turnover ; not more than Annual Turnover ; not more than
Rs. 5 crore Rs. 50 crore Rs. 250 crore
Significance of MSME for India
(1) Source of Employment:
• As per 4th Census of MSME Sector, the sector
employs 59.7 million persons spread over 26.1
million enterprises.
• Since the sector is more labour-intensive, it has the
potential to create more employment per unit of
capital employed.
• Also the sector is capable of generating
unskilled/semi-skilled employment
(2) Contribution to manufactured output and
exports:
• In terms of value, MSME sector accounts for about
45% of the manufacturing output.
• Around 40% of the total exports (in value terms) of
India is contributed by MSME sector
(3) Best way for achieving inclusive growth:
• Income benefit of small enterprises is derived by
large population while large enterprises encourage
more concentration of economic power
(4) Taps latent resources:
• MSMEs are a training ground for entrepreneurial
talent.
• A MSME of today will be a big enterprise of
tomorrow, and might well become a MNC
eventually, if given adequate policy support.
This lecture note was prepared by the Instructor (Sthanu R Nair, Indian Institute of Management
Kozhikode) for the sole purpose of student learning. It is nothing but proper arranging/ordering
of relevant parts from the sources indicated at the end of the note with data/photo additions.
Please do not circulate this note in any public platform or share to others without the Instructor’s
permission.
1
1. The Issue:
Industrial sector in India consists of mining; manufacturing; electricity, gas and water
supply; and construction. Of this manufacturing constitutes about two-thirds of industrial output.
The share of industry in GDP rose from 11% in 1950-1 to 17% in 1980-1 to 20% in 1990-1 and
has stayed there for long. Correspondingly, the share of manufacturing rose from 9% in 1950-1
to 15% in 1990-1 and has stayed there for long. In terms of growth, the performance of the
industry/manufacturing sector has been unimpressive since 1991 reforms. All these despite that
many reforms undertaken since 1990s were aimed mainly at industrial/manufacturing sector.
In fact, with the introduction of economic reforms in 1991 India hoped for a dynamic
industrial sector, in particular manufacturing sector. But the sector never took off as it did in
other countries such as China, South Korea and Taiwan. According to National Manufacturing
Competitive Council to achieve a growth rate of GDP of 8 to 10 per cent consistently over a
longer period the industrial and manufacturing sectors respectively needs to grow at 11.21% and
12.26%. The similar figure for services and agriculture respectively are 10% and 4%.
Moreover, in so far as subsectors within manufacturing have performed well, these have
been the relatively capital-or skill-intensive industries (automobiles, engineering goods,
chemicals, pharmaceuticals, iron and steel, petroleum and petroleum products, textiles, gems and
jewellery), not the unskilled labour-intensive ones (footwear, toys, apparel) as would be expected
for a labour-abundant country like India. Among our leading exports only apparel is unskilled-
labor intensive. This pattern of manufacturing growth has two major negative fallouts: (i) the
relatively slow transformation of India from a primarily agricultural and rural economy to a
modern one (in other words, slow transition of the labor force from agriculture to non
agricultural activities); (ii) the poor employment record of economic reforms, terms popularly as
“Jobless Growth”.
2
industry is likely to create many more opportunities for the poor than will growth in capital-
intensive and skilled labor-intensive sectors.
2. Factors responsible for the lackluster performance of industrial sector during the post-
reforms period:
(b) Credit constraints: Credit constraints due to weaknesses in the financial sector
particularly banking sector may be holding back small and medium sized firms from expanding.
Firm level data show that medium-sized firms -- even those well above the "small scale"
threshold – are subject to credit constraints and appeared to be operating well below their
optimal scale. Since the performance of the bank managers is not linked as tightly with the
profitability of the banks, and is probably influenced more by the incidence of non-performing
loans, they have little incentives to provide credit to the private sector. Hence they play
extremely cautious and rather than lending to the private sector would rather invest in safe
government securities.
(c) Procedural delays: Business regulations might have influenced key decisions of
firms and potential investors. As the World Bank's (WB’s) Doing Business surveys of business
regulations across the world have found, the procedures and costs for starting and, especially,
3
closing a manufacturing business in India are among the most cumbersome in the world.
However, in WB’s Doing Business 2018 report, India climbed 30 positions. The report ranked
India at 100 among 190 countries. The improvement in India’s ranking was driven by ease of
paying taxes, resolving the insolvency problem, access to credit and protection of minority
investors. However, the same report noted that India lagged behind in areas such as starting a
business, getting electricity connection, enforcing contract and dealing with construction permits.
(d) High cost of inputs/production: Due to (i) inefficient indirect tax system; (ii) high
cost of public services like power, railway transport and water; (iii) high cost of finance and (iv)
stringent regulations on land use in India. A comparison of costs of input materials (IM) and
utilities in India, China, Malaysia and Korea across 15 important manufacturing segments
showed that on the average the share of IM and utilities in total output value was as high as
81.3% in India as against 75.5% in China, 68.7% in Malaysia and only 58.5% in Korea. Total
taxes on manufactured goods are 25 to 30% of retail price in India, compared to 15% in China.
(f) Lack of competency and comparative advantage: A CII-McKinsey Report, found that
retail price of Chinese products are lower by 30% in general in comparison to Indian products
(g) Skilled labour shortage: In recent years the availability of skilled labour has also
emerged as a constraint on the growth of manufacturing and services.
(h) Dependence on consumer goods industry: Industrial growth which depends more on
consumer goods industry make growth more volatile since demand for consumer goods is
income-elastic
(k) Poor R&D: The Advanced Technology Products have a sizeable market in the world.
Indian companies continue to display low levels of ambition, as measured by their commitment
to research and development. India's R&D spend as a proportion of GDP, at 0.7%, is one-fourth
than that of the US, less than half of China's and lower than Brazil's. Indian companies are
4
willing to license technology or buy it from willing providers rather than try and develop it on
their own. The technology available in this fashion will never be cutting-edge.
The MSMEs are important for India’s economic development due to the following reasons.
(a) Source of employment: Small industries are recognised as important for employment
generation. This is because small enterprises are labour-intensive and thus create more
employment per unit of capital employed. They are also capable of generating unskilled/semi-
skilled employment. As per 4th Census of MSME Sector, the sector employs 59.7 million persons
spread over 26.1 million enterprises. In India the corporate sector provides just over 14 million
1
Before 1991 the nomenclature used to describe small businesses was “small scale industry” (SSI). Hence, in this
note we use the terms SSI and MSME interchangeably.
5
(or 10% of India’s employment) jobs. The jobs for the hundreds of millions of other people are
provided by informal sector including MSMEs.
(c) Taps latent resources: Small enterprises are able to tap latent resources like hoarded
wealth, entrepreneurial ability, etc. The growth of an entrepreneurial class requires an
environment. Small enterprises provide that environment which encourages a growing network
of feeder and complementary relations among plants and firms. It is in this environment that
latent talents of individual entrepreneurs find self-expression in localized innovations and cost-
saving measures. In short, SSIs are a training ground for entrepreneurial talent.
(e) Contribution to manufactured output and exports: A robust MSME sector is the
pillar of broad-based economic growth in any country. In terms of value, MSME sector accounts
for about 45% of the manufacturing output. Around 40% of the total exports (in value terms) of
India is contributed by MSME sector. A significant feature of exports from the small-scale sector
is their share in non-traditional exports.
India is one of the very few countries to have consistently supported small-scale
enterprises in order to promote greater employment and perhaps also a more egalitarian
distribution of wealth. Even the Nehruvian model reserved the crucial roles of providing
6
employment and relatively inexpensive consumer goods for the “small-scale sector”. In addition
to the creation of small industrial estates, tax and other financial incentives were provided and
later, many products were “reserved” for this sector.
(a) Reservation Policy: Under this policy, virtually all unskilled labour intensive products
were reserved for exclusive production by small-scale industry (SSI). The policy of reserving
products for exclusive manufacture in the small-scale sector was started in 1967 with 47 items
(see Table), which was expanded later. The reservation policy ensured protection of SSIs from
large-scale domestic units thereby undermining their competitiveness. Non-SSI units (i e, me-
dium/large units including multinationals) can manufacture reserved items if they have obtained
a carry-on business licence, which capped their capacity, and fixed the location of the plant and
the goods produced, or accept an export obligation of 50% of their production.
This reservation policy alone was sufficient to ensure that India would exclude itself from
exports of labor-intensive manufacturing products. Foreign firms interested in buying labor-
intensive products from cheaper sources demanded a scale and quality standard that the SSI
units were typically incapable of supplying.
(b) Reservation of some of the products produced in the SSI sector for purchase by
government agencies.
(c) Supply of scarce materials, technology and input price concessions like
lower/concessional interest rates on loans from formal financial institutions. Banks were required
to compulsorily ensure that a defined percentage of their overall lending is made to priority
sectors as classified by the government, which includes the small-scale sector. The Small
7
Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) was set up as the apex refinance bank for the
sector.
(d) Numerous fiscal measures such as excise duty exemptions and other tax concessions.
(e) Protection to SSIs from imports under the import substitution policy.
Since 1991, the SSI industry in India has been confronted with an increasingly
competitive environment due to:
(a) As part of economic reforms, govt. has progressively trimmed the list of products
reserved for exclusive production by SSI, in particular, from year 2000.
(b) Import liberalization – As part of economic reforms, the government has liberalized
the import regime. In particular restrictions on import of consumer goods were completely
removed from April 2001.
(c) There has been a rapid increase in FDI inflow into diverse sectors of Indian industry.
This has created threats to SSI sector through greater competition, particularly in non-durable
consumer goods industries.
(d) The public sector had been a major customer of small enterprises in India. The growth
of the public sector has declined considerably since 1991 than before in terms of not only
investment and employment but also production and absolute numbers. The curtailed growth of
PSUs has resulted in reduced growth or even absolute reduction in public sector demand for
small industry products in the 1990s and 2000s. In addition, there has been a reduction in the
number of products reserved exclusively for purchase from small industry by the government.
However, in November 2011 the government has revived the public sector procurement policy
by asking the government departments and PSUs to give preferences to MSME while making
purchases.
(e) Withdrawal of concessional element in lending rates for small industry. While the
nominal targets have remained unchanged, the effective burden of priority sector advances has
been reduced by expanding the definition of priority sector lending to include, for example,
information technology companies. As a result, the share of credit going to the SSI sector has de-
clined over time.
8
All the above changes imply that the SSI sector has no option but to ‘compete’ or ‘perish’
under the new liberal regime.
(a) Lack of availability of adequate and timely credit and High cost of credit: Access to
adequate and timely credit at a reasonable cost is the most critical problems faced by this
sector. The internal resources of SSIs are so small that they have no surplus to live on during the
period of business strain. This leads to instability of their profits. As MSMEs operate in an
extremely cost-competitive environment with limited resources including old technologies, they
are susceptible to failure.
Also the formal lending sector is unable to assess the risk of the applicant due to the
unorganised nature and prevailing asymmetry of information on the MSME sector. MSMEs
pose a challenge for commercial banks desirous of exploring lending opportunities in this sector
or going downstream. This is due to the fact that being associated with MSMEs involves
working on a set of data that could be unreliable vis-a-vis data on the bigger corporate
borrowers.
According to Small and Medium Enterprises Rating Agency (SMERA), the issue gets
compounded in the SME sector as financial statements are often unaudited or incomplete in
nature. Similarly, multiplicity of financial statements, lack of access to authentic information,
internal governance, succession issues, etc., compel the lender to practice safe and cautious
lending in this sector. In developing markets, this problem is further complicated by the absence
of robust information bureaus providing historical credit data. It is now a well acknowledged
fact, based on various studies, that MSME units are most susceptible to cease their operations
in the first two years. Considering these issues, the banking sector's demand of collateral as a
tool to safeguard its interests deters credit flows to this sector. This, in turn, creates a vicious
cycle, resulting in stunted growth of the SME sector.
9
All these deter banks from giving unsecured loans. Lack of adequate bank finance also
affects the ability of MSMEs to invest or upgrade to better technology. Nor are they able to
expand their market or hire better resources or build business linkages with larger firms in the
domestic or overseas markets.
(b) Limited access to equity capital: At present, there is almost negligible flow of equity
capital into this sector, despite the fact that overall capital inflows have witnessed significant
increase in the recent years. Absence of equity capital may pose a serious challenge to
development of knowledge-based industries, particularly those that are sought to be promoted by
the first-generation entrepreneurs with the requisite expertise and knowledge.
(c) Inadequate infrastructure facilities, including power, water, roads, etc.: MSMEs are
either located in industrial estates set up many decades ago or are functioning within urban areas
or have come up in an unorganised manner in rural areas. The state of infrastructure, including
power, water, roads, etc. in such areas is poor and unreliable.
(d) Low technology levels and lack of access to modern technology: The MSE sector in
India, with some exceptions, is characterised by low technology levels, which acts as a handicap
in the emerging global market. As a result, the sustainability of a large number of MSEs will be
in jeopardy in the face of competition from imports.
(e) Weak marketing facility: This is considered as an important reason for the closure of
small industry units. SMEs do not have the expertise or the strategic tools required to create or
widen their markets, unlike their counterparts in the corporate sector. According to census of
MSME, 44.5 per cent of the units suffering from sickness/incipient sickness cited marketing
problems as the reason for their plight.
(f) Problems in supply to government departments and agencies: While India continues
to be growing market cheap imported goods have a direct impact on the MSEs and their survival.
Given the globalisation, governments across the world are providing supportive measures to the
MSEs through targeted benefits and facilities. In line with the practice internationally, a Public
Procurement Policy for MSEs is vital to ensure a stable market for the MSEs.
(g) Lack of skilled workforce for manufacturing, services, marketing, etc.: Although
India has the advantage of a large pool of human resources, the industry continues to face deficit
10
in manpower with the right skill set for specific areas like, manufacturing, service, marketing,
etc. The HR problem is further exacerbated by the low retention rate.
(h) Absence of a suitable mechanism which enables the quick revival of viable sick
enterprises and allows unviable entities to close down speedily: Worldwide, MSMEs are
credited with high level of innovation and creativity, which also leads to higher level of failures.
Keeping this in view, most of the countries have put in place mechanisms to handle insolvencies
and bankruptcies. The present mechanism available in India for MSMEs is archaic. Business
failure in India is viewed as a stigma, which adversely impacts individual creativity and
development in the country. However, in 2016 the government introduced Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for resolving insolvencies which at present is a long process and does
not offer an economically viable arrangement. The code is expected to make the process of doing
business in India a cumbersome-less process.
In 1993, while holidaying in Australia, William Bissell (MD, FabIndia, a chain retailing ethnic
products) once ran into an experienced surfer who shared an invaluable lesson with the 27-year-
old. Don’t just surf the course, but keep a constant watch on where the next wave is coming
from, he advised him.
11
successful retail business that his father John started to built way back in 1960. It wasn’t until
William took over the reins in 1999, that Fabindia started to go places.
Today, Fabindia is considered one of the most profitable retailers in the country. Under Bissell’s
leadership, Fabindia has almost singlehandedly built a network of a rapidly vanishing breed of
handloom weavers and artisans, which in turn supply handicrafts to a loyal set of city folk.
Bissell co-opted 22,000 artisans and made them into shareholders through an elaborate
community-owned model
The structure and ownership pattern is common to all CoCs. AMFPL puts in 49% equity and
offers 26% to artisans, non-profit organisations and self-help groups who are their suppliers, and
10% to employees. The remaining 15% is raised from outside sources such as private equity or
venture funds. Thus, by creating CoCs, Bissell was able to attract bank funding against orders
from Fabindia.
Artisans are closely involved in CoCs’ decision-making. Their boards include one artisan
director, key staff members of the CoC who are working directors, three independent directors, a
representative of an outside investor and one AMFPL member.
12
Over a period of time, AMFPL proposes to reduce its exposure to these companies to 26%, with
artisan ownership growing. “The equity thus raised will be used to build common facilities in
regions that artisans hail from,” says Fabindia MD Willam Bissell. The facilities include
warehousing, dyeing houses, technical support and CoC offices to represent artisans in the
region. While for now these CoCs are captive suppliers to Fabindia, they will soon be allowed to
deal with other buyers in the domestic and export markets.
Bissell faced resistance from inside Fabindia. Many felt that splitting the supply chain from a
centrally managed operation into 17 companies would place a huge burden on the system. There
were concerns that artisan shareholders would start driving up prices or not send supplies on time
because they had more power now. It was a radical idea but Bissell knew that if this plan
succeeded the company would achieve two things: Fabindia would get an assured supply chain
and artisans were empowered to control their means of livelihood. Convincing the artisans to
put their money into the company was tough, but William made that happen. He sat with the
13
artisans and explained how inherently valuable their craft was and how it could be capitalised.
He convinced them that they should also have a share in this value by investing in it.
The CoCs have lifted craftsmen and weavers across the country out of their dreary, hand-to-
mouth existence. These small firms lead a silent movement to bring rural artisans and craftsmen
into the mainstream socially and professionally. Apart from providing artisans market linkage for
their products through Fabindia’s retail network, a CoC also brings to them infrastructure and
design inputs, access to technology and systems, quality guidelines and timely payments. Once
far removed from the financial mainstream, artisans now own shares, which give them
ownership rights and rewards, and which they can use as collateral. Where they were once
merely suppliers of wares, they now have a sense of belonging to the company. Their lives have
also improved through the CoCs’ community intervention, such as schools and hospitals in rural
areas.
For instance, one investor was 52-year-old Paru Bai of Dandkala village in Bikaner, who like
most other artisans, crossed over from Sindh province of Pakistan after the 1971 war. Bai today
owns 176 shares of Rangasutra (a CoC). She understands that these shares represent her right to
demand work from the company, apart from being a neat instrument of saving. “We were
nomads, there was no stability in our life, no secure way of earning money. Today, we benefit
from the steady orders,” she says. Today, Bai has a pucca house, with a fully tiled toilet (a
novelty in her village) and a barbed wire securing the house.
The AMFPL model espouses the best of both worlds — capitalism and socialism. “It’s not just
about finding a retail platform for these artisans’ produce, but about building communities,” says
Smita Mankad, MD of AMFPL. “Most of these artisans have never known any income source in
their lives other than a daily wage. It’s a huge feeling for them to own shares in a company,”
says MD, DAH Jaipur, Prakash Tripathi .
For one of the beneficiary, Shambhu Singh, the DAH stake has meant a sea change in his attitude
towards life. “It is our company and we’ll do everything to ensure that it grows rapidly,” he says.
He has understood that his extra income from dividend and his investment will only grow if the
company makes higher profits.
Also shares in CoCs offer artisans a divisible asset class — land is divisible, but it often leads to
disputes. Jewellery is largely indivisible. If an artisan wants to get his daughter married or needs
14
money for his children’s education, he can easily sell his shares. “We can also take a loan by
offering our shares as collateral instead of pledging our land,” says Raj Kishore, an artisan
belonging DHA.
The success of the CoC model has begun to inspire state governments. The Orissa government
recently signed a memorandum of understanding with AMFPL to roll out such CoCs in the state.
AMFPL, on its part, is approaching other state governments with similar proposals. It is in
discussions with them to introduce handicrafts in the National Rural Employment Guarantee
scheme. For the artisans, it can only mean a life closely tied to prosperity.
15
Sources Used for Preparing this Note
1) Report of Prime Minister’s Task Force on Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises,
Government of India, January 2010.
2) Bhaduri, Amit (2008): “Predatory Growth,” Economic and Political Weekly, April 19.
3) Business World (2011): “The SME Whitebook 2011-12 – Essential Handbook for Small and
Medium Enterprises”.
4) M H Bala Subrahmanya (2010): “Auto SMEs in Bangalore: Does Innovation Promote
Employment and Labour Productivity?”, Economic and Political Weekly, March 13.
5) M H Bala Subrahmanya (2004): “Small Industry and Globalisation Implications, Performance
and Prospects,” Economic and Political Weekly, May 1.
6) T.A. Bhavani (2002): “Small-Scale Units in the Era of Globalisation Problems and Prospects,”
Economic and Political Weekly, July 20.
7) “Small-Scale Industries”, In The Oxford Companion to Economics in India, edited by
Kaushik Basu, Oxford University Press, 2007
8) Ruddar Datt and K P M Sundharam (2010) “Indian Economy” (Chapter on Small-Scale
Enterprises), S.Chand Publication, New Delhi.
9) “Economic Reforms and Industrial Structure in India” by Sudip Chaudhuri (Economic and
Political Weekly, January 12, 2002)
10) “Growth and Distribution in Indian Industry in the Nineties” by Pulapre Balakrishnan and M.
Suresh Babu (Economic and Political Weekly, September 20, 2003)
11) “Unorganised and Organised Manufacturing in India: Potential for Employment Generating
Growth” by Uma Rani and Jeemol Unni (Economic and Political Weekly, October 9, 2004)
12) “What Constrains Indian Manufacturing?” by Poonam Gupta, Rana Hasan and Utsav Kumar
(ICRIER Working Paper No.211; March 2008)
13) “Overview of the Indian Corporate Sector: 1989-2002” by Petia Topalova (IMF Working
Paper No.WP/04/64; April 2004)
14) “China and India: Idiosyncratic Paths to High Growth” by Kaushik Basu (Economic and
Political Weekly, September 19, 2009).
15) “India’s Recent Economic Growth: A closer look” by R Nagaraj (Economic and Political
Weekly, April 12, 2008).
16) Mousumi Majumdar, Sarbajit Sengupta (2010): “Declining Registration by Small
Manufacturing Units: A Case Study of Durgapur”, Economic and Political Weekly, July 19.
17) Economic Survey, Government of India (Various Years).
18) “Fruits of the Loom”, The Economic Times (Special Feature), October 12, 2010; “Not Easy
to Balance Social, Biz Interests”, The Economic Times (Special Feature), July 25, 2012; and
“Fabindia’s Tightrope Walk”, Forbes India, November 4, 2011.
16
Recommended Additional Readings
Sebastian Morris, Rakesh Basant, Keshab Das, K Ramachandran and Abraham Koshy (2001):
“The Growth and Transformation of Small Firms in India”, Oxford University Press,
New Delhi.
Konosuke Odaka and Yukihiko Kiyokawa (2008): “Small and Medium Scale Industry in
India and the Model of Japan”, Allied Publishers, New Delhi.
M H Bala Subrahmanya (2003): “Technological Innovations in Small Enterprises:
Comparative Study of Bangalore and North-East England”, Economic and Political
Weekly, May 24.
Hongyi Chen (2000): “The Institutional Transition of China’s Township and Village
Enterprises”, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, England.
Business World (2011): “The SME Whitebook 2011-12 – Essential Handbook for Small and
Medium Enterprises”.
Radhika Singh (2010): “The Fabric of our Lives – The Story of FabIndia”, Penguin Viking.
Also see the readings uploaded in Virtual Classroom.
2) The Driving Force of Japan: Small and Medium Enterprises (27.56 minutes video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBfPeY2ZecA
5) FabIndia’s Community-owned-Company Model: This NDTV Profit video (in Three Parts)
provides an excellent account of a business model developed by FabIndia to source fabrics from
rural artisans and empower the artisans to control their means of livelihood.
**********
17
Lecture Note: Can India catch up with China in manufacturing prowess?
This lecture note was prepared by the Instructor (Sthanu R Nair, Indian Institute of
Management Kozhikode) for the sole purpose of student learning. It is nothing but proper
arranging/ordering of relevant parts from the sources indicated at the end of the note with
data/photo additions. Please do not circulate this note in any public platform or share to
others without the Instructor’s permission.
1
1. India and China in the World Economy:
Today, China and India together account for 40% of the world’s population. Since
1980 Chinese economy has been growing at the average rate of over 9%. India is
following behind China, with an average growth rate of close of 6 per cent a year since
1980, with some evidence that growth is accelerating and can be sustained at 8 per cent a
year in the coming decades. Whereas China has emerged as a predominantly industrial
economy (share of industry in GDP was 46% in China and 27% in India), India became a
service economy (share of services in GDP was 41% in China and 67% in India). The
world’s economic super power United States (US) now feels that Chine will inevitably
tilt global trade and technology balances in its favor, ultimately becoming an economic,
technological, and military threat to it. Business and political leaders in the US now fear
that China's growing share of world exports, especially of high technology and industrial
goods, signals the rise of yet another mercantilist economic superpower in northeastern
Asia.
With huge population base, the two giant economies present a huge and fast
growing domestic market (demand side) for a range of goods and services, and thus
export opportunities for producers in the rest of the world. This is evident from the
growing share of China in world export of manufactures. The share is expected to rise in
the future, assuming of course, China’s rapid growth is not a bubble but will be sustained.
This means that foreign raw material suppliers depend to a greater extent on Chinese
demand. Any disruption in Chinese demand in the short-run can be costly for them. The
market potential of India and China is also evident from the large flows of FDI to these
countries, both for production for the domestic market, but also to use exports to the rest
of the world. The fact that India has attracted far less FDI, is not because of the lack of
potential opportunities in India, but largely because of policy hurdles and other
constraints on investment.
Besides being a major demand market, India and China influence world economy
as major exporters (supply side). Foreign users who depend on China’s exports of
goods/merchandise for a sizeable share of their total use, could be faced with the prospect
of having to search for alternative supply sources if Chinese exports are disrupted for
2
whatever reason. According to Morgan Stanley, low-cost Chinese imports (mainly
textiles, shoes, toys, and household goods) have saved U.S. consumers (mostly middle-
and low-income families) about $100 billion dollars since China's reforms began in 1978.
U.S. industrial firms such as Boeing, Ford, General Motors, IBM, Intel, and Motorola
also save hundreds of millions of dollars each year by buying parts from lower-cost
countries such as China, increasing their global competitiveness and allowing them to
undertake new high-value activities in the United States. Similar argument holds for
India’s exports of services. Therefore, shocks to these two countries’ import demand (and
export supply) are sources of risk for foreigners.
All these simply imply that both India and China have become increasingly
integrated with the world economy. But China has gone much farther in this regard.
China has attracted and continues to attract far more foreign capital (FDI and FII) than
India. A major portion (above 70%) of foreign investment inflows into China consists of
FDI. In case of India, foreign investment inflows are mainly in the form of FII (above
70%).
3
exempts foreign investors from regulation applicable elsewhere in China (particularly
relating to hiring and firing and foreign ownership), helped in attracting huge FDI into
China. Moreover, excellent infrastructure facilities, particularly power, road, and
communications also played a crucial role in attracting FDI.
China has a large and wealthy diaspora that has long been eager to help the
motherland. Its money (in the form of FDI) has been warmly received. To overcome
rising wage costs domestically, to overcome limitations of domestic technology to
produce for the world market and to overcome growing competition from the other Asian
economies non-resident Chinese in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan invest in China.
Conscious of the absence of a strong domestic entrepreneurship, Chinese authorities have
been very hospitable to non-resident Chinese entrepreneurs.
By contrast, the Indian diaspora was, at least until recently, resented for its
success and much less willing to invest back home. New Delhi took a dim view of
Indians who had gone abroad, and of foreign investment generally, and instead provided
a more nurturing environment for domestic entrepreneurs. With the welcome mat now
laid out, direct investment from nonresident Indians is likely to increase. The Indian
diaspora has famously distinguished itself in knowledge-based industries, nowhere more
so than in Silicon Valley. Now, India’s brightening prospects, as well as the changing
attitude vis-à-vis those who have gone abroad, are luring many nonresident Indian
engineers and scientists home and are enticing many expatriate business people to open
their wallets. With the help of its diaspora, China has won the race to be the world’s
factory. With the help of its diaspora, India could become the world’s technology lab.
China did not give protection to domestic firms, something both Japan and South
Korea did during their periods of rapid growth. Instead, it has allowed foreign firms to
develop new markets for their goods and services, especially high-value-added products
such as aircraft, software, industrial design, advanced machinery, and components such
as semiconductors and integrated circuits. Chinese domestic consumers act as a powerful
domestic coalition against protectionism. They, especially urban consumers, pride
4
themselves on driving foreign-brand cars and using mobile phones and computers with
circuits that were designed and manufactured abroad. The result: in the Chinese market
domestic manufacturers of appliances, motorcycles and TVs, to name a few goods, have
been able to successfully compete with those from Japan, Korea, etc.
Most of the industrial units producing lower-end manufactures are not state
owned. Nor are they all owned by individual capitalists. A large proportion of China’s
explosive industrial growth took place in what are known as ‘Township and Village
Enterprises’ (TVEs). TVEs are collectively owned industrial enterprises, owned by the
respective township or village. Their surpluses accrue not to individual capitalists but to
the township or village authority. These TVEs, have a number of advantages. They are
located on land owned by the local authority itself, and thus do not have to pay any rent
for land on which factories are situated, resulting in a substantial price advantage. Also, a
part of China’s savings is held by TVEs, thereby lessening the dependence of the TVEs
on costlier bank credit for working capital. However, the TVEs cannot subsidise losses
through recourse to the public exchequer. They have to stand on their own financially and
cannot exist for a long while making losses.
What contributed to the success of TVEs? First, the dramatic and demonstrative
impact on the growth of the small and medium industries in rural areas was facilitated
through extensive decentralisation of power to regional authorities for improving
efficiency in the planning and utilisation of local resources and development of local
industries. Second, the local governments had a strong incentive to promote TVEs as
these contributed substantially to revenues which the local governments could retain for
themselves under the revenue sharing arrangements. Third, FDI came to be favoured in
the development of TVEs. The impressive development of TVEs was primarily due to
their connections to the international market. The presence of FDI became pervasive in
labour-intensive and export-processing TVEs such as electronics and
telecommunications, garments and footwear, leather products, printing and record
processing, cultural products and plastics. In the TVEs the areas of highest growth were
also the areas of deepest foreign penetration. The connection with FDI brought TVEs in
5
competition with SOEs and stimulated the latter to increase productivity and unit scale.
Fourth, major agricultural boom coming in the wake of economic reform in agriculture,
with better prices and better land tenure, with the farmers acquiring fixed term land use
rights in the late 1970s and moving towards full property rights in recent years. For more
details see the Case Study on TVEs (at the end of this note).
(a) The high level of education of Chinese workers. The virtually universal
literacy of Chinese workers enables higher productivity.
(b) The TVEs model does not lead to the same accumulation of profits in the
hands of a few individuals. Also the workers are not made to suffer the consequences of
adjustment, as in the usual privately-owned enterprises. As a result, workers would
6
develop closer attachment with such enterprises which, in turn, stimulates higher
productivity.
China and India have taken different reform paths. China started off with reforms
in the agriculture sector and in rural areas, while India started by liberalizing and
reforming the manufacturing and services sector. These differences have led to different
growth rates.
(1) Individual farmers secured an incentive to produce more than their obligation to
plan, which they could sell in open market
(2) Land reforms (land distribution & tenure system, limiting the number of landless)
(6) State procurement system dismantled everywhere except for main grain-
producing regions
7
Of these the measures 2, 3, 4 and 5 were initiated by China before the
introduction of economic reforms starting from 1978.
Land is a collectively owned resource in China. There did not exist a formal or
officially approved land market up to the early 1990s. Any units in society, public or
individual, who needs land must obtain permission to the right of land usage from the
government. For instance, only the rights to the use of land are entitled to rural
communities, the rights to transfer and dispose of land are not, any allocation of farmland
lies in the hands of local community governments.
Thus, in China as a whole, land is not yet a commodity, not yet real estate. This
was a major advantage the country had in its march towards industrialisation (this is
especially the case of TVEs). Of course, a lease market is growing in China and this is
likely to put an end to the advantage it has in land not being a commodity.
China follows trial and error approach in implementing reforms. The adoption of
new measures through experimentation rather than a predetermined blueprint increased
the likelihood of the success of reforms since it implied a “learning by doing” approach
or, in the words of Deng Xiaoping, one of “crossing the river while feeling the rocks”.
This was peculiar to the Chinese reform process in which the government made sure that
each new policy was field-tested at length and determined to be successful in selected
experimental districts before it could be applied nationwide and the next measure
introduced.
8
(xi) Centralisation of decision making:
In both Indian and China there was political will to carry out reforms, but in
practice outcomes were shaped by the different patterns of governance. India is a
“debating society” where political differences are expressed freely. Policymaking is
exposed to the pressure of various interest groups and there are long debates before
decisions are taken. The lengthy bureaucratic procedures, intended to ensure checks and
balances in the system, often delays decision-making and implementation. This exercise
is compatible with the needs of a free and dynamic polity but in practice is a key reason
for India’s slow pace of economic reforms.
China, on the other hand, is a “mobilising society” where decisions are taken
faster and state power is backed by mass mobilisation. As a result, implementation of
decisions is more effective although there is lack of more elaborate debate in China on
major reforms. Another key factor in the effective implementation of reforms in China
was the ability of the leadership to set both clear objectives and time frame for transition
to the reformed regime. This is made possible due to centralization of decision making.
On the other hand, in the context of a highly pluralist society like India, consent is more
difficult to achieve, and so neither clear objectives nor time frames for transition can be
set.
9
sustained indefinitely into the future due to the expected fall in the working age
population.
But, India’s position on this front is more favourable than China’s. The share of
population in the age group 15-59 in India’s total population is projected to rise to 61% in
2050. Also dependency will fall slightly from 67% to 64% during the same period.
India’s saving and investment rates are likely to increase further for life cycle as well as
other reasons.
By contrast, India’s domestic financial system has far greater depth and wider
international linkages. This is despite the low gross domestic saving rate in India.
Though, like China, India’s commercial banking system is still dominated by public
ownership of nearly three quarters of its assets, nevertheless it has become more efficient
with increasing competition from dynamic new domestic private banks and also foreign
banks. India’s capital markets operate with greater efficiency and transparency than do
China’s. Indian stock and bond markets generally allow firms with solid prospects and
reputations to obtain the capital they need to grow.
10
(c) Neglect of indigenous domestic industry:
India, on the other hand, developed a softer brand of socialism, which aimed not
to destroy capitalism but merely to mitigate the social ills it caused. For democratic,
postcolonial India, allowing foreign investors huge profits at the expense of indigenous
firms is simply unfeasible. It was considered essential that the public sector occupy the
economy’s “commanding heights” However, that did not prevent entrepreneurship from
flourishing where the long arm of the state could not reach. While China has created
obstacles for its entrepreneurs in the post-reforms period, India has been making life
easier for local businesses during the post-1991 reform period. As a consequence,
entrepreneurship and free enterprise are flourishing in India.
China’s developing capitalism is not solidly based on law, respect for property
rights and free markets. The business climate in China remains capricious and often
corrupt. Local governments protect their own counterfeiting operations as a source of
local revenue. The Chinese government continues to be the policy maker as well as the
judiciary. As long as this continues there is no way the legal system will be credible.
China’s intellectual property right protections, although strong in theory, are in fact
impossible to enforce in much of the country.
On the other hand the property rights regime is firmly entrenched in India. The
protection of private ownership is certainly far stronger in India than in China. The rule
of law, a legacy of British rule, generally prevails. Moreover, India developed much
11
stronger legal infrastructure to support private enterprise. India’s legal system, while not
without substantial flaws, is considerably more advanced. Corporate governance has
improved dramatically in India.
The first decade of the last century, with its relentless double-digit growth, may
well have seen the peak of China’s economic exuberance. Growth will inevitably slow
over the next decade, as China settles into its status as a middle-income country, and the
burden of caring for an ever larger number of elderly people in a slower economy may
make middle-class life far more uncomfortable. As a result of the impending slowing in
economic growth, the love affair between a communist party that calls itself the vanguard
of the proletariat and its actual, middle-class supporters is now under threat. The
government is struggling to shift China away from the current unsustainable model,
where growth is propelled by vast investment and export-led manufacturing.
China will have to work harder to sustain the urbanisation that has fuelled the
economy. China has succeeded in attracting underemployed young rural residents to
urban jobs. But the supply is beginning to slow. It would help if farmers could sell or
mortgage their rural land and use the money to help gain a stronger foothold in the cities.
But the government remains overly fearful of privatising farmland, partly for atavistic
fears of a destitute peasantry, and partly for ideological reasons.
Worse still, the system of household registration, or hukou, defines even long-
staying urban migrants as rural residents, cutting them out of housing, education and
other benefits (i.e. treating them as second-class citizens). No wonder that the migrants
are increasingly restive. Urban unrest has not become more common in China. If the
party is to keep the peace in cities and if it is to continue to attract migrants in sufficient
numbers, it needs to find ways to turn them into full-fledged city-dwellers, with the
consumer power to match.
Here it runs up against the middle class most directly. To give migrants the same
housing and other benefits as urban hukou holders, and to build a proper social safety-net
12
will be expensive. And if more tax is the solution, then the middle class could well begin
demanding a greater political say.
Among the four types of enterprises, TVE sector was actually predominated by
collectively owned enterprises [i.e. township enterprises and village enterprises] rather
than private enterprises in terms of contribution to the TVE sector’s output and
employment generation (but not in terms of number of units).
The property rights and the governance of collective TVEs can be described as
two-tier principal-agent proxy relations (see Figure).
13
The Two-tier Principal-agent Relations in Collective TVEs
1
Township government in a township enterprise case, or the village leaders in a village enterprise case.
14
3. Contributions made by TVEs to China:
Township and Village Enterprises (TVE) sector has made incredible contribution
to China in terms of improvements in economic growth, output, employment, tax
revenue, and rural income.
The TVE sector contributed only 4.2 percent of the total tax revenues in 1978,
but this contribution reached 21.6 percent in 1995.
(ii) With the award of more and more economic autonomies to local authorities as
part of economic reforms, many local leaders became actively involved in the initiation
and the development of TVEs.
15
(iii) Local community governments/leaders acted as a 'public entrepreneur',
which has clearly defined property rights, hard budget constraints, and strong incentives
to enforce improvement in efficiency in collective TVEs. Compared with other
transitional economies, the community governments/leaders functioning as the
catalyst rather than barriers is one of the most distinctive features in China's reform
practice. Their active and powerful role in rural enterprise development and
modernization is probably a unique experience among many developing countries. In
other transitional counties, local leaders tend more to be barriers to growth.
(iv) Local government leaders had strong incentives to launch and promote the
development of TVEs. The incentive structure for local leaders consisted of the following
elements:
(b) Local leaders have the obligation to fulfill the assigned targets to build up
their political image and ensure promotion. Under the cadre evaluation system in
China, local leaders' repute and likelihood for political promotion are determined by their
career achievements. Underperformers would be removed from their current positions
and relegated to lower ones. They could also be transferred to a remote and/or less
developed area if they were unable to achieve those targets. In short, they would 'lose
face and lose future' if such situation applied to them.
16
Performance Criteria for Township Leaders
(Qingyunpu Township, Jiangxi Province), 1993
(d) Personal Benefits: Local leaders receive a base salary from the state payroll.
In addition, there are various side-payments and personal benefits for local leaders that
became possible as a result of local TVEs development. The number one category of
such benefit is the privileged welfare program for local leaders funded by local
governments' revenue. For example, a township in Jiangsu had built a number of
townhouses at the cost of 140 thousand yuan each, exclusive of land costs. These
townhouses were sold to the major township leaders at the price of 20 thousand yuan
each in 1994. Another perk was travels. Many of the local leaders traveled all over the
country, even abroad, at the expense of the township governments or villages. Those
travels were in name of business trips, training trips, or research visits. Another category
is the possession of consumer goods produced by local TVEs. Two furniture producing
factories in the Hubei investigation site reported that about 10 percent of their output was
taken by local leaders, either from their own township and neighbor townships, or from
the City which is the direct higher authority of the township, at be1ow cost price. Yet
another category that incurs the most criticism is the side payment in the form of free
dinners and valuable personal presents, usage of luxury goods 'borrowed' from TVEs or
TVE managers, or even direct cash payments to the local leaders in exchange for favored
tax treatment, land or credit allocation privileges, raw-materials or energy provisions to
17
the enterprises. Thus, more TVEs, particularly profitable TVEs, in a locality mean more
personal benefits through legitimate methods.
(viii) Easier access to land: Village leaders have the easiest access to land
because land is under their direct control. When a Villagers' Committee decides to launch
18
a new village enterprise, it simply assigns a piece of land within the boundary of the
village farmland to this proposed enterprise. The peasant household that was previously
cultivating the land would be moved to other piece(s) of land, generally without much
ado. The village may provide the household employment opportunities in the firm as
compensation. Very few financial exchanges would be involved in such land acquisition.
When the higher levels of governments have their eye on land that is out of their direct
control to set up collective enterprises, they must negotiate with the community that has
the rights over the land. In most cases, the community leaders cannot refuse such
requisition, but would bargain for more favorable compensation.
Source: Hongyi Chen (2000): “The Institutional Transition of China’s Township and
Village Enterprises”, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, England.
19
Sources used for preparing this Note
1) George J. Gilboy (2004): “The Myth Behind China’s Miracle,” Foreign Affairs,
Jul/Aug. Vol. 83, Iss. 4; pg. 33
2) D.N. Ghosh (2001): “Basis of China’s Competitiveness,” Economic and Political
Weekly, February 17.
3) D.N. Ghosh (2005): “FDI and Reform: Significance and Relevance of Chinese
Experience,” Economic and Political Weekly, December 17.
4) T.N. Srinivasan (2006): “China, India and the World Economy,” Economic and
Political Weekly, August 26.
5) R. Nagaraj (2005): “Industrial Growth in China and India: A Preliminary
Comparison,” May 21.
6) Yasheng Huang and Tarun Khanna (2003): “Can India Overtake China?,” Foreign
Policy, July/August.
7) Shenggen Fan and Ashok Gulati (2008): “The Dragon and the Elephant: Learning
from Agricultural and Rural Reforms in China and India,” Economic and Political
Weekly, June 28.
8) Bishwanath Goldar (2005): “Impact on India of Tariff and Quantitative
Restrictions under WTO,” ICRIER Working Paper No.172, November.
9) Prasad Ananthakrishnan and Sonali Jain-Chandra (2005): “The Impact on India of
Trade Liberalization in the Textiles and Clothing Sector,” IMF Working Paper
No.214, November.
10) World Trade Organisation: International Trade Statistics (Various Issues)
11) Samar Verma (2007): “Indian Textile and Clothing Industry: Economic Policy
Reform Experience During ‘ATC’ Period”, in India’s Liberalisation Experience:
Hostage to the WTO?, Edited by Suparna Karmakar, Rajiv Kumar and Bibek Debroy.
Sage India.
12) The Economist (2012): “China and the Paradox of Prosperity”, January 28-
February 3.
13) The Economist (2011): “Rising Power, Anxious State”, June 25.
14) Hongyi Chen (2000): “The Institutional Transition of China’s Township and
Village Enterprises”, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, England.
15) Howard E. French (2017): Everything under the Heavens: How the past helps
shape China’s push for Global Power, Alfred A. Knopf
20
Recommended Additional Readings
Jonothan Story (2010): China Uncovered: What you need to know to do business in
China, Pearson.
Chun Liao (2009): “The Governance Structures of Chinese Firms – Innovation,
Competitiveness, and Growth in a Dual Economy”, Springer.
Ashok Gulati and Shenggen Fan (2007): “The Dragon and The Elephant –
Agricultural and Rural Reforms in China and India”, New Delhi: Oxford University
Press.
“China After 1978: Craters of the Moon”, Essays from Economic and Political
Weekly, Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan Private Limited.
Tarun Khanna (2009): “Billions of Entrepreneurs – How China and India Are
Reshaping their Futures – and Yours”, Penguin Books.
Pallavi Aiyar (2008): “Smoke and Mirrors – An Experience of China”, New Delhi:
Fourth Estate.
Also see the readings uploaded in Virtual Classroom.
21
Reforming the Labour Laws for better Industrial
Performance: Is there a way out?
Theme of the Session
With introduction of economic reforms in 1991 India hoped for a
dynamic industrial sector, in particular manufacturing sector. But
the sector never took off as it did in other comparable countries
(e.g. China). Lack of flexibility in the labour market has been
considered as one of the prime reasons for the lackluster
performance of Indian manufacturing sector. In particular, certain
provisions in the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (IDA) are said to
be market-distorting. On its part, the government is facing an acute
dilemma over this issue and labour and managements are at
loggerheads with each other, forcing the government to be
circumspect in reforming the labour market. Faced with fierce
resistance from trade unions, the government is facing difficulty in
introducing drastic labour reforms, especially that of providing
employers the flexibility to hire and fire workers.
In this context, this session focuses on the implications of the
existing labour laws on manufacturing performance, the views for
and against deregulation of labour market, and the possible way
out of the policy logjam.
The Issue
• Lack of flexibility in the labour market has been
considered as the prime reason for the lackluster
performance of Indian manufacturing sector.
It can also fire workers without notice and does not owe any
severance pay.
This lecture note was prepared by Sthanu R Nair for the sole purpose of student learning. It is nothing but proper
arranging/ordering of relevant parts from the sources indicated at the end of the note with data/photo additions. Do
not circulate this note in any public platform or share to others without the Instructor’s permission.
1
“A lot of things can be simplified. All the old antiquated laws like labour laws have to be
modified. Today, it may sound a cliche, our labour laws are presently pro-employee. It should
be pro-employment. The law should encourage the industry to employ more people. You cannot
say you shouldn’t lay off people whether you have business or not. This is not right in a
competitive environment because today customers are ruthless. The way they cut down
schedules from Germany or US is ruthless. If we want to take more risk there, we should also
have some flexibility. Most importantly, government should bring a simple law with respect to
engaging non-permanent workers. It has to define wages, hygiene conditions, preferences and
norms during recession period, among others. Globally, every factory uses 40-50 per cent
temporary workers to keep the costs down”
The term “labour market flexibility” comes nowadays in the discourse on “market
reforms” and economic growth. The basic idea is that free play of market forces results in
employment of resources at the market-clearing prices; this leads to both efficiency (as almost all
resources are employed) and equity (all are rewarded according to their marginal contribution).
Regulation of the market by the state leads to deviations from full employment of all resources.
Hence, attempts should be made to remove as many of these imperfections in the market as
possible so as to achieve full employment of all resources and optimal social welfare.
In the case of labour market, trade unions and protective labour legislations are said to be
market-distorting agents, which curtail the free operation of market forces to ensure full
employment of labour. Interference by collective institutions (law and trade unions) in the
market process increase transaction costs, which mar investment, thereby resulting in
unemployment and welfare loss. These institutional interventions in the name of equity and
social justice superimpose terms set above the market-clearing prices. As a result, markets do not
clear, wages become “sticky” and the cost calculations of firms go haywire. These institutions
not only tamper with the “price” and the essential market signals that enable efficient functioning
of the market, but also affect the freedom of employers to adjust the “quantities” of resources,
which, in turn, leads to unemployment. They also result in “inequity” because by protecting the
interests of “insiders”, they hurt the chances of “outsiders” entering the labour market, who thus
remain unemployed. A social divide is created, which perpetuates, inequality. While the
“outsiders” remain scattered and their political power becomes diffused, the “insiders”, on the
other hand, are well-organised and vocal, and influence policy decisions more than their
2
unfortunate counterparts. Hence, it is strongly argued that the labour market should be
deregulated for stimulating investment and employment, as well as equality in order to provide
flexibility in entry and exit.
However, after the introduction of economic reforms in 1991, it has been increasingly
realized that the rigidity of the Indian labour market is one of the prime reasons for the lackluster
performance of Indian manufacturing sector. In particular, certain provisions in the Industrial
Disputes Act 1947 (IDA) are said to be market-distorting. On its part, the government is facing
an acute dilemma over this issue and labour and managements are at loggerheads with each
other, forcing the government to be circumspect in reforming the labour market. Faced with
fierce resistance from trade unions, the government is hesitant to introduce drastic labour
reforms, especially that of providing employers the flexibility to hire and fire workers.
(i) The Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (IDA) confers on the state (i.e. government) the
power to regulate labor-management relations. This is unlike the laws of most other countries,
where the state can move to intervene only after bilateral negotiations between workers and
management break down. Once the Labor Departments of the central and state governments with
jurisdiction over a firm, decides that a certain dispute merits its intervention, it initiates a process
3
aimed at reconciling the two sides. If this process fails, the matter is sent to the labor judiciary.
The latter has predominantly ruled in favor of workers. Labor unions prefer this system to
alternatives because it greatly increases their bargaining power vis-a-vis management.
(ii) Under Section 9A of the IDA an employer must give three weeks' written notice to a
worker of any change in his or her working conditions. These changes include (a) changes in
shift work, (h) changes in grade classification, (c) changes in rules of discipline, (d) a
technological change that may affect the demand for labor, and (e) changes in employment,
occupation, process, or department. The worker has the right to object to these changes, which
may culminate in an industrial dispute with the associated costs in terms of time and financial
resources. This provision makes it very difficult for the firm to respond quickly to technological
changes or changes in demand/market conditions.
(iii) Under Chapter V-B of the IDA, it is mandatory for firms with hundred or more
workers to seek the permission of the Labour Department (government) for layoff and
retrenchment of workers, and closures of industrial units.1 In addition, notice and compensation
has to be issues to workers. The permission is seldom forthcoming. Therefore, under current
provisions, a firm with one hundred or more workers has effectively no right to retrench or layoff
workers. Even when it is bankrupt, it must pay its workers out of profits from other operations.
In this context, it is to be noted that, when this provision was originally inserted into the IDA by
an amendment passed by Parliament in 1976, chapter V-B applied to industrial establishments
employing an average of 300 or more workers. An amendment in 1982 (brought into effect in
1984) reduced this employment threshold to 100.
The introduction of Chapter V-B was prompted by rampant use of layoffs, retrenchments
and many closures – “about half a million workers were laid off after the declaration of
Emergency during the period of June 1975 to December 1975. Besides, more than thirteen
thousand workers were retrenched and 76 establishments were closed down rendering about ten
thousand workers jobless”. The government tried to persuade employers to stop these unilateral
1
According to IDA a layoff “means the failure, refusal or inability of an employer on account of shortage
of coal, power, or raw materials or the accumulation of stocks or the breakdown of machinery or natural
calamity or any other connected reason to give employment to a workman whose name is borne on the
muster rolls of his establishment” (IDA Section 2 (kkk)). Layoffs are limited to 45 days on half pay.
Retrenchment means the permanent termination of a worker’s service, other than on account of
punishment, retirement, ending of a contractual period, or continued ill-health [IDA, section 2 (oo)].
4
acts; when these efforts failed, the government brought about the amendment to the ID Act to
introduce the (in) famous restrictive provisions. Emergency was bad, but this law was good at
least then. Now, this restrictive provision is seen to hurt the process of employment generation.
(iv) Factories with 50 to 100 workers are covered by Chapter V-A of IDA, which does
not require official permission, imposes shorter notice periods, and provides a cap on
compensation in cases “where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable
circumstances beyond the control of the employer”.
The aforementioned stipulations are not applicable to undertakings employing less than
50 workers. They are not required to give notice of closures to the government, or to pay
compensation for layoffs. If a firm chooses to employ less than ten workers (twenty if it does not
use power) its workers are not covered by most of the national labor legislation [Note: Such
firms fall under unorganized sector]. It does not have to offer formal employment contracts or
the usual benefits such as paid annual leave, sick leave, or medical and pension benefits. It can
also fire workers without notice and does not owe any severance pay. Minimum wage
regulations may apply, depending on the state and the sector, but these are not vigorously
enforced. 88.3 percent of non agricultural workers were employed in the unorganized sector
under precisely this set of conditions in 1999-2000. If a firm chooses to employ ten or more
workers (twenty or more if not using power) the firm must establish a pension fund for the
workers.
(i) Pro-worker regulation encourages firms to stay small so as to avoid registration (or)
drop below the radar of Chapter V-B of the IDA.
(ii) Encourages firms to adopt capital intensive technologies. For instance, in the
aftermath of 2012 labour unrest at Maruti’s Manesar plant, Maruti disclosed its plan to automate
certain critical production functions in its Manesar plant that would bring its Manesar operations
on par with its hi-tech plants in Hamamatsu, Japan. Chief operating officer (production) at
Maruti Suzuki, MM Singh at that time said "We gradually plan to automate our plants in India to
bring consistency in the quality of our cars. We have already started the process at Manesar's
first plant to take automation to the maximum possible 99% level, where the press and weld
5
operations would be on par with the second (manufacturing) facility," 2 For a detailed account of
the labour unrest at Maruti’s Manesar plant, see the case study in Appendix.
(iv) Outsourcing (or subcontracting) some inputs previously produced in-house. The
advantage of the subcontracting option is that by doing so a greater part of the firm’s activity
goes outside the purview of labour legislation. The disadvantages of subcontracting are: (a)
further expansion of unorganized sector and (b) huge sacrifice in terms of feasible
technologies and scale economies due to fragmentation into such small units.
(v) Detrimental effect on the entry of large-scale firms in the unskilled labor-intensive
sectors in at least two mutually reinforcing ways. First, firms are afraid that should they go bust
for some reason, they will be stuck having to pay full wages to a large workforce despite
bankruptcy. Second, various labor laws have disproportionately strengthened the hand of the
unions in wage negotiations. Consequently, the wages in the organized sector are now several
times those in the unorganized sector. These high wages are less of an issue for the firms in the
capital-intensive industries since labor costs are only a tiny proportion of their total costs. But for
unskilled labor-intensive firms, such high wages result in a very large increase in their unit costs
and render them uncompetitive.
(i) In India, several economists, industry associations and mainstream media have
attributed the deceleration in employment growth in India, particularly in the organised
industrial/manufacturing sector, to inflexibility/rigidity in the labour market – identified in
terms of job security provisions, and lack of any relation between productivity and wages.
Absence of such provisions (or labour market flexibility) is believed to have increased the labour
costs for enterprises, thereby promoting capital-intensive methods in the organised sector,
encouraging the use of non-regular workers and hindering investment (including foreign
investment) in manufacturing sector and economic growth.
(ii) Employment protection laws are also believed to be inequitable, dividing workers
into protected and unprotected categories. Over-protection of a small section of workers is not
2
‘Maruti Suzuki to use more robots at manesar plants’, The Economic Times, September 3, 2012.
6
only ostensibly inimical to the growth of employment, but also goes against social justice as
more and more workers are faced with deplorable working conditions.
(iii) Employment law (Employment (Standing Orders) Act] and the judicial process
(emphasising the principles of natural justice) have made difficult removal of even ‘bad’
workers; it is a case of justice hurting efficiency as the difficulties involved in the process
introduce rigidities.
In this context, very often the example of China is given, which has drastically changed
its system of labour market from a rigid security of employment to one in which labour is
extremely mobile. It is said that it has greatly helped China in generating employment as well as
successfully redeploying workers who were laid off in the process of restructuring of enterprises.
However, in China, the underpaid and overworked workers have started protesting, forcing
employers to raise wages. This can have a two-fold effect in India: one, Indian employees may
also start negotiating for higher wages. Two, wage inflation may force some companies to lose
their competitiveness in China and shift to India. This process may raise the pace of wage
increase in India, particularly when it comes to the educated and skilled workforce. The unskilled
workforce would, of course, continue to remain at the lower echelons. It is argued that more than
100 developing countries have reformed their labour laws in response to competitiveness in the
era of globalisation, but India remains among a select few countries with a rigid system of labour
protection.
(a) Labour cannot be treated like any other commodity, and measures like minimum
wages, job security, separation benefits, social security, trade union rights, etc, are socially and
politically necessary even for sustaining the process of globalisation, as they increase labour
productivity. In India there is no ‘right to work’ and no general unemployment assistance; in
such a situation it is not practicable to “give a blank cheque to the employers – government or
private, to operate exit policy.” Hence, for trade unions provisions such as Chapter V B
“encompass the right to livelihood, natural justice and transparency.”
(b) Despite all the hue and cry about inflexibility in the labour market and stringent
labour laws, the Indian industry has been adjusting its workforce, more so after liberalisation.
7
(c) The fact that employers have resorted to the increasing use of contract labour in the
post-reforms period suggests that employers have been able to find ways to reduce the workforce
even with the “restrictive” provisions in place. Studies have found that the percentage of contract
workers to total workers in manufacturing has increased significantly over the years.
(d) Firms have increasingly dispensed with permanent workers in the non-core activities
through outsourcing to other firms. This has resulted in increasing informalisation of the
workforce. The proportion of unorganised sector employment has considerably increased in
construction, transport, storage and communications, and financial services. Apart from new jobs
largely being created in the unorganised sector, a large number of retrenched workers have found
refuge in the unorganised sector.
(e) Although VRS has been the main instrument to reduce workforce, large-scale
closures through adopting informal routes (non-payment of electricity bills, etc) have also been
used.
(g) Flexible labour practices at the ground level have adversely affected the trade
unions and there has been a general decline in their strength. Trade unions have been further
weakened by the ascendancy of managerial rights and new strategies like outsourcing and
parallel production. The weakening of workers’ bargaining capacity and rise in the militancy of
employers are also manifested in the significant increase in the incidence of lockouts and a
decline in the incidence of strikes. All these have enabled employers to resort to flexible
practices on a wide scale, bypassing the formal rigidities of the labour market. In a significant
number of cases where informal routes have been adopted (e g, unofficial closures), the workers
have suffered a lot, as they have been deprived of their dues.
8
(h) Almost all over the world, higher wages are associated with higher employment,
implying that unemployment could be the result of many other factors (e.g. increasing pressure
on manufacturing units to adopt capital intensive production technique).
(i) A ILO study, based on data collected from 162 countries, concludes that stronger trade
union rights do not generally hinder trade competitiveness, including trade of labour intensive
goods, and indeed countries with stronger trade union rights tend to do comparatively well.
(j) Deregulation of the labour market, even in most of the advanced capitalist countries,
has not been able to contain high unemployment even after decades of implementation.
(k) Flexibilisation is a strategy to weaken labour rights and to increase the profitability of
firms and their bargaining power, without any positive impact on the level of employment.
(l) Insecurity (in all forms) has risen in the wake of liberalisation, privatisation and
globalisation processes. Hence, more protection should be given to the labour force.
(m) There should not be ordinarily any retrenchment due to introduction of automation,
computerisation and modernisation. However, if surplus exists on account of these the factors
surplus workers should be redeployed by the same firm without affecting the existing service
conditions.
(n) Employers ask for exit policy to close down the unionised firms and take them to
backward areas to enjoy income tax and sales tax exemptions granted by the government – a
kind of subsidy. Employers employ nonunionized flexible categories of employment in the
backward areas and pay them low wages. Many Indian and multinational companies follow this
practice. Hence, trade unions argue that companies that receive subsidies from the taxpayers for
creating employment should come under social scrutiny for maintaining employment.
To conclude, the logic of attributing the slow growth of employment to labour market
inflexibility is not correct in all cases. Labour market institutions play a minor role, if any at all,
in determining investment and employment. This weakens the case for the total removal of the
provisions relating to closure and retrenchment.
9
5. Policy recommendations for achieving cordial worker-employer relationship:
The following initiatives/measures will go a long way to ensuring cordial worker-
employer relationship.
(a) An income security system consisting of unemployment or social security benefits
for a specified period, provisions for re-training and active assistance for job search should
precede the grant of reasonable and limited freedom to employers to retrench workers with
sufficient notice and adequate as well as timely compensation. The policy of “free hire and fire”
can be tackled if the state intervenes to ensure the security of income to all workers. India is
among those countries that spend least on social services and social security. China, whose
example is often cited in the context of labour flexibility, adopted a wide range of security of
workers before introducing reforms in the labour market.
(b) Rationalisation of work practices in consultation with trade unions should be
allowed in order to adjust to the rapid changes taking place in technology and markets. Since
labour productivity is a function of skill and technology, employers should agree to invest in
both the development of workers’ skill and upgradation of technology. An active labour market
policy of skill development and redeployment, as has been successfully implemented in the
Scandinavian countries, should be pursued in which the trade unions, employers and government
should closely collaborate.
(c) The burgeoning employment in the informal sector, along with its low productivity,
low wages, fragile employment and income insecurity, necessitates the regulation of this sector
in such a way as to create organised sector-like conditions of higher productivity, better
employment and wages. In the absence of unionisation of workers and the enforcement of even
minimum labour standards, this sector is inevitably caught in the conundrum of low productivity
and low wage equilibrium. This equilibrium needs to be disrupted by ensuring a floor of labour
standards in this sector.
(d) Indian labour laws are too voluminous and ambiguous to be effective from the
point of view of either labour or capital. This only promotes costly litigation and corruption in
the labour departments of state governments. Accordingly, a rational businessman would prefer
to violate labour laws at the lesser cost of bribing the inspector or paying the measly fine
imposed by the courts. Hence it is alleged by many that the hue and cry about getting rid of
the inspector raj and the non-existent inflexibility of the labour market is intended to get
rid of both the cost of compliance and that of violation altogether. Hence, there is an urgent
need to simplify, rationalise and consolidate different labour laws into a maximum of three
simple pieces of labour legislation after wide consultation among employers, trade unions and
labour law experts.
(e) Workers should be willing to undergo training or retraining at employers’ costs and
accept redeployment without loss of current earnings or status.
(f) Severance pay an allowance paid by the employer for terminating an employee
irrespective of the reason for termination. It is provided where social security is not existent or
inadequate. It is paid by the employer or by a fund set up specifically for this purpose with
employer’s contributions. Severance pay may be a fixed amount; but in most cases it is
calculated taking into account level of wages and length of service.
10
Severance pay prescribed should be treated as ‘minimum’ and the rates can be modified
upwards by collective agreements; differential severance pay should exist as in other countries; it
should vary according to the economic health of the firm. Constitution of a ‘severance fund’
could be thought of with contributions from both employers (higher rates) and workers. This
fund could be used for various purposes such as retraining, job-placement services, early
retirement programmes, relocation subsidies, etc. As in the Latin American countries they could
be used for paying the severance package payments.
(g) Layoffs should be taken out of the government purview; instead the rates of
compensation for layoffs should be progressively higher: it should be 50 per cent of wages and
allowances for the first month, 75 per cent for the second month and full salary subsequently.
The high cost of layoff itself would discourage the employer from using it frequently and
without merit.
(h) Avenue for Redressal and Reinstatement: Protection of workers in cases of unfair
dismissals covers avenues for rederessal also. The principle here is that the affected worker
should have the right to appeal against what he/she thinks to be unfair dismissals. The bodies that
enquire into these appeals may be employment or labour courts, administrative bodies, private
arbitration agencies, or special bodies created by the collective agreements. Remedies in cases of
proven unfair dismissals include reinstatement of the dismissed worker. If reinstatement is
impractical, then financial compensation is provided.
(i) Role of Government: A number of countries (31 countries including US, UK, France
and Germany)), require the firms to notify the government authorities of all job losses. It was
found that some 33 countries in 1980 had laws requiring employers to notify a government
agency in advance of collective dismissal of workers. An ILO Survey (1980) found that some 15
countries, mostly developing countries, required explicit requirements for government
authorisation of workforce reductions – Algeria, Chile, Colombia, France, India, Iraq, The
Netherlands, Panama, Portugal, Peru, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Spain, the Sudan and Zaire. Thus, a
few countries require the employers to obtain prior permission before effecting dismissals. In
sum, it can be said that prior authorisation for effecting labour separation and closure is the most
significant difference between India and most other countries; to be sure, it exists in a few
countries, but only in a few.
(j) Fixed-term Contracts: Most OECD countries and several developing countries
recognise the use of fixed-term contracts in ‘objective’ situations, a term which typically refers
to specific projects, seasonal work, replacement of temporarily absent permanent workers (on
sickness or maternity leave) and exceptional workload. These workers do not require notice of
dismissal and severance pay; it is a flexible arrangement. Its use is generally unrestricted.
6. Recent Policy Initiatives by the Central and State governments in the Labour Market
(a) Shram Suvidha Portal: A unified labour portal scheme called ShramSuvidha Portal
has been launched for timely redressal of grievances and for creating a conducive environment
for industrial development. Its main features are: (i) Unique Labour Identification Number
(LIN) allotted to around 0.7 million units facilitating online registration; (ii) filing of self
certified, simplified single online return instead of 16 separate returns by industry; (iii)
11
transparent labour inspection scheme via computerized system as per risk-based criteria and
uploading of inspection reports within 72 hours by labour inspectors.
(b) Amendment of Apprentices Act: The Apprentices Act, 1961 was amended on
18.12.2014 to make it flexible and attractive to youth and industry and an Apprentice Protsahan
Yojana to support micro small and medium enterprises (MSME) in the manufacturing sector in
engaging apprentices has been launched. Government is also working affirmatively to bring a
single uniform law for the MSME sector to ensure operational efficiency and improve
productivity while ensuring job creation on a large scale.
(c) Under Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Project Panchdeep:
Digitization of internal and external processes to ensure efficiency in operations, especially
services to employers and insured persons. The portal enables employers to file monthly
contributions, generate temporary identity cards and create monthly contribution challans online,
issue of pehchan card for insured persons for fast and convenient delivery of services. Through
the IP Portal, insured persons can check contributions paid/payable by employers, family details,
entitlement to various benefits, and status of claims. Integration of its services will promote ease
of business and curb transaction costs.
(d) Under Employees Provident Fund (EPF): Digitization of complete database of 42.3
million EPF subscribers and allotment of universal account number (UAN) to each member,
which facilitates portability of member accounts. UAN is being seeded with bank account,
Aadhar Card and other KYC details to promote financial inclusion. Direct access to EPF
accounts will enable members to access and consolidate previous accounts. Online pensioners
can view their account and disbursement details online. The statutory wage ceiling under the
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions (EPF&MP) Act was enhanced to Rs.
15000 per month from 01.09.2014. A minimum pension of Rs.1000 has been introduced for
pensioners under the Employees’ Pension Scheme 1995 w.e.f 01.09.2014.
(e) Registration made easy: Registration with the Employees Provident Fund
Organization (EPFO) and Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) has been automated
and ESIC registration number is being provided on a real-time basis. A unified portal for
registration of units for Labour Identification Number (LIN), reporting of inspection, submission
of returns and grievance redressal has been launched by the Ministry of Labour and
Employment.
(f) For Unorganized Workers: The Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) is a
scheme under the Unorganized Workers’ Social Security Act 2008. It is a smart card-based
cashless health insurance scheme, including maternity benefit, which provides a cover of Rs
30,000 per family per annum on a family floater basis to below poverty line (BPL) families in
the unorganized sector. It is proposed to extend the RSBY to all unorganized workers in a phased
manner.
(g) A National Council for Vocational Training-Management Information System
(NCVT-MIS) portal has been developed for streamlining the functioning of Industrial Training
Institutes (ITI), Apprenticeship Scheme, and assessment/certification of all NCVT training
courses.
(h) National Career Services Portal: The Government is mandated to maintain a free
employment service for its citizens. This is now being transformed with the launch of the
12
National Career Service (NCS) Portal on 20 July 2015. The NCS is envisaged as a digital portal
that will provide a nationwide online platform for job seekers and employers for job matching in
a dynamic, efficient and responsive manner. As of 31 December 2015, approximately 3.58 crore
job seekers, 9 lakh employers and 27,000 skill providers are registered on the portal. The
Government has also approved the establishment of 60 model career centers and these are likely
to become functional during 2016-17.
(i) The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act 2015: The Payment of Bonus
(Amendment) Act 2015 received the assent of the President on 31 December 2015. The
eligibility for bonus payment as defined under section 2 (13) of the Payment of Bonus Act 1965
has been increased from R10,000 to R21,000 per month. Section 12 of the principal Act states
that the calculation of bonus with respect to certain employees where the salary or wage of an
employee exceeds R7000 (or the minimum wage for the scheduled employment as fixed by the
appropriate government, whichever is higher) shall be paid per month, the bonus payable to such
employee under section 10 or, as the case may be, under section 11, shall be calculated as if
his/her salary or wage were R7000 per month (or the minimum wage for the scheduled
employment as fixed by the appropriate government, whichever is higher).
(j) The Parliament has recently passed three labour code Bills named The Industrial
Relations Code, 2020 (hereafter IR code), The Code on Social Security, 2020, and The
Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions Code, 2020. In 2019 another piece of
labour legislation named The Code on Wages, 2019 was enacted by the Parliament. These codes
were based on the Second National Commission on Labour (2002) recommendations that the
plethora of central and state labour laws need to be simplified, rationalised and grouped into
functional codes that can be easily understood and complied with by the industry and workers.
Currently, there are around 40 central and 100 state laws related to labour. Among these, The
Industrial Relations Code (IR Code) is touted as one that would energise industry and spur
economic activity, as it aims to free employers from the constraints of earlier labour laws. The
following are the key features of IR code.
The provisions that require the prior permission of the government for lay-off,
retrenchment and closure are made applicable to only establishments that had
employed 300 or more workers. The Code also allows the government to raise this
threshold by notification. However, the requirements for issuing notice and paying
compensation to the laid-off and retrenched workers have been retained at the
present level of firms employing 100 or more workers. This reform measure implies that
industrial establishments using less than 300 workers need not have to obtain prior
government permission for layoff and retrenchment of workers and closure of their
establishment.
Worker re-skilling fund: The Government shall set up a fund to be called the worker re-
skilling fund. The fund shall consist of (a) the contribution of the employer of an
industrial establishment an amount equal to fifteen days wages last drawn by the
worker immediately before the retrenchment, or such other number of days as may be
notified by the Central Government, for every retrenched worker in case of retrenchment
only; (b) the contribution from such other sources as may be prescribed by the
appropriate Government. The fund shall be utilised by crediting fifteen days wages
last drawn by the worker to his account who is retrenched, within forty-five days of
such retrenchment, in such manner as may be prescribed.
13
Works Committee: In the case of any industrial establishment in which one hundred or
more workers are employed or have been employed on any day in the preceding twelve
months, the appropriate Government may by general or special order require the
employer to constitute a Works Committee, in such manner as may be prescribed,
consisting of representatives of employer and workers engaged in the establishment. It
shall be the duty of the Works Committee to promote measures for securing and
preserving amity and good relations between the employer and workers and, to that
end, to comment upon matters of their common interest or concern and endeavour to
compose any material difference of opinion in respect of such matters.
Grievance Redressal Committee: Every industrial establishment employing twenty or
more workers shall have one or more Grievance Redressal Committees for resolution of
disputes arising out of individual grievances.
Establishment that employ 300 or more workers must prepare standing orders
relating to classification of workers, manner of intimating to them periods and hours of
work, holidays, pay days etc, shifts, attendance, conditions for leave, termination of
employment, or suspension, besides the means available for redress of grievances.
The IR code introduced ‘fixed term employment’, giving employers the flexibility to
hire workers based on requirement through a written contract. Fixed term employees
should be treated on a par with permanent workers in terms of hours of work, wages,
allowances and other benefits, including statutory benefits such as gratuity.
There shall be a negotiating union or a negotiating council in an industrial
establishment having registered Trade Union for negotiating with the employer of the
industrial establishment. Where there is more than one trade union in an establishment,
the sole negotiating union status will be given to the one that has 51% of the
employees as its members. Where no union qualifies under this criterion, the employer
must constitute a ‘negotiating council’ consisting of representatives drawn from the
various unions, with only those with at least 20% of employees as its members.
The Code prohibits strikes and lock-outs in all industrial establishments without
notice. No unit shall go on strike in breach of contract without giving notice 60 days
before the strike, or within 14 days of giving such a notice, or before the expiry of any
date given in the notice for the strike.
(k) State-level reforms: Of late, the central government has been encouraging states to
change their labour laws according to their needs and conditions. Making use of this opportunity,
states like Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat have introduced labour
reforms in their respective states. Haryana reformed its labour law to allow enterprises with up
to 300 employees to lay off workers without the government’s permission.
14
The threshold of the number of employees required for the purpose of applicability of the
Factories Act has been increased from 10 to 20 (in electricity-powered factories) and
from 20 to 40 (in factories without power) thereby putting small factories in Rajasthan
outside the purview of the Factories Act
Membership of 30 per cent of the total workforce needs to be recorded for a union to
obtain recognition, up to 15 per cent, a move that will halt productivity losses due to
industrial dispute
As against the existing threshold of 20 contract labour/workmen, the Contract Labour Act
will be applicable only to those establishments and contractors in Rajasthan who employ
50 or more contract labour/workman in the preceding 12 months
Workers in Madhya Pradesh will get the benefit of earned leave after six months of
service, in the same calendar year. This will apply to factories with at least 10 workers if
they are without power connection, or factories with at least 20 workers if they have
power connection. At present, employees are entitled to annual leave after they have
worked for at least eight months, but they are able to avail of these in the next calendar
year.
Overtime hours for workers in a quarter will be increased from 75 hours to 125 hours.
The factories will have to maintain a record of overtime of workers and pay double the
wages if the work hours are extended.
Women will be allowed to work in night shifts at factories — they could work from 8 pm
to 6 am in morning. The state government will make necessary provisions for their safety
and security.
Gujarat has eased “hire and fire” provisions in special investment regions like the Delhi
Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC), National Investment and Manufacturing Zone
(NIMZ), export-oriented industrial establishments and some other economic zones. In
these areas, companies are allowed to lay off workers without the government’s
permission, but wages equivalent to 60 days of work every year have to be paid to the
retrenched workers.
15
of an industrial dispute. The amended labour law has a provision where both the parties
(workers and industry) can end their dispute through compromise called as 'compounding
of offenses'. Under this new system of compounding of offenses, workers can arrive at
compromise with the employer without approaching court. For this, government will
charge upto Rs 21,000 as penalty from the employer and give 75 per cent of that penalty
money to the affected employee or employees. However, this compounding of offenses
will be only implemented if both the parties agree to it,
The state government is allowed to prohibit labour strikes in public utility service from
the minimum period of six months to one year.
A workman gets only a year to make an application against his dismissal, discharge, etc,
for raising an “industrial dispute” to the labour court or tribunal, which was hitherto three
years.
The Government of Maharashtra is also in the process of making changes in the existing
legislations. The government has proposed an overtime of 115 hours from the present 75 hours
for workers in small-scale industrial units. Among the notable changes, factories employing up
to 300 workers can be closed without government permission, compared with the earlier floor of
100 employees.
(k) Legalising fixed-term employment: In certain sectors namely footwear, leather and
accessories and apparel the central government has allowed businesses to offer fixed-term
contracts to workers. In other words, an establishment could sing on employees for a
specified duration under the assumption that their employment will be ended once the
project that they are hired for is finished. It is expected that this reform may address some of
the problems faced by companied in India, especially those that wish to expand or invest in
new plants. Currently, any investment or expansion decision is complicated by the fact that
new employees are technically for life. In the recent Union Budget the government had
announced that the system of fixed term employment will be expanded to all sectors in the
years to come.
16
APPENDIX I
CASE STUDY: How Maruti Suzuki lost connect with its Workers
A day after workers at Maruti Suzuki's Manesar facility went on strike in June, 55-year-old MM
Singh, the company's head of manufacturing, was scheduled to address a meeting of the
company's functional heads of departments. "Hum apna connect kahaan kho gaya? Kya gadbad
hua? (how did we lose the connect with our workers? what went wrong?)," Singh said in his
opening remarks, in part question, part introspection.
Maruti Suzuki has enjoyed relatively good relations with its labour force. The last labour strike
was in 2000, at its other facility in Gurgaon. The image of the company in the minds of many
management personnel seems to have been that of one where the workers were happy. This
could have contributed to negative feedback from workers not trickling all the way up as
frequently or forcefully as it should have.
Part of the answers to Singh's introspective question might lie in measures he spearheaded at the
company a little over a year ago. In early-2010, coming out of the slowdown in car sales in 2008
and 2009, Maruti experienced a spurt in demand. While the company expected demand to rise, it
was not prepared for the sudden jump -- a 30% rise year-on-year -- in bookings.
17
What made the situation worse was that the company had not invested in manufacturing capacity
during the slowdown. The longer wait period for Maruti's models meant rivals started
cannibalising market share. "Losing market share due to lack of capacity can prove to be the
death knell for an auto company," Singh told Forbes India in an interview published in April this
year.
Singh and his team put in place a series of measures to produce more. This included more
frequent maintenance of machines, reprogramming robots that control the assembly line to
squeeze out efficiency, and implementation of a "flexi-line" that could produce multiple models.
Production zoomed.
Singh's measures saved Maruti the cost of a new assembly line -- Rs 1,700 crore. Its Manesar
plant, with an installed capacity of 250,000 cars a year then, started making 350,000 cars. To
ensure worker buy-in, their incentives were aligned to production.
In essence, Maruti stepped on the gas hard, responding to market realities. But life on the shop
floor took a turn for the worse. While production at its Gurgaon facility rose by 17%, Manesar
was pushed harder, with a 40% jump.
The highly automated plant at Manesar was inaugurated in February 2007. Later that year, in
December, Shinzo Nakanishi became the managing director of the firm, taking over from
Jagdish Khattar, a former bureaucrat who helmed the company for more than eight years.
Nakanishi, a nephew of Suzuki Motors chairman Osamu Suzuki, had been non-executive
chairman since 2002. But for the first time since 1983, the highest-ranking executive officer at
Maruti Suzuki was now Japanese.
According to a company spokesman, the Manesar plant draws its employees mostly from
Haryana, in particular from regions such as Jheend and Jhajjar. The plant has about 950 regular
workers, 400 trainees, 700 contract workers, and 400 apprentices.
A regular worker at Maruti could make up to Rs 25,000 per month in CTC (cost to company) in
his first year of employment (after three years of traineeship). About 50% of this is in the form of
performance incentives, including an attendance reward that amounts to 18% of CTC and has
become a contentious issue in the ongoing strike. Trainees make Rs 13,000-14,000. And a
18
contract worker, depending on his skills, anywhere from the minimum wage (Rs 4,644 in
Haryana) to Rs 12,000.
About 60% of Maruti workers are regular employees and the remaining are contract workers.
The minimum qualification to be a regular worker at Maruti is class ten and an Industrial
Training Institute diploma. The average age of workers at Manesar is under 25, while that at
Gurgaon is above 30. Very few workers at Manesar are married or have children, allowing them
greater staying power in a strike.
Most workers at Manesar worked their way through three years of traineeship at Maruti and
became regularised in 2010, entitling them to privileges trainees and contract workers don't
enjoy. It was a little after that the Singh-helmed acceleration of production seems to have
resulted in increased friction in labour relations.
The strategic decision to squeeze out maximum possible efficiency from existing plants didn't
trickle down smoothly to the shop floor. Striking workers complain about abusive behaviour and
even instances of slapping by supervisors, charges the company denies. Workers say the
conditions at the Manesar plant were too stringent, while the management can't seem to
comprehend the difficulty as the Gurgaon plant has operated under identical conditions for more
than 25 years now.
In an eight-hour work shift, workers get a 30-minute lunch break and two 7.5-minute tea breaks,
according to the company spokesman. "You have to remove your safety equipment, run 150
metres to grab your tea and snack, and then run to the toilet that is about 400 metres away, and
be back in seven minutes," says Shiv Kumar, general secretary of the proposed Maruti Suzuki
Employees Union. "If you are a bit late, abuses from the supervisor. In the morning, the place
resembles a busy train station, with everyone grabbing tea and running to the toilet."
Kumar is a brooding, well-built 27-year old, with an intense air about him. He strikes a contrast
to the affable and lanky Sonu Gujjar, the president of the proposed union, who has become the
charismatic and savvy face of the agitation. Kumar says workers can't leave their workstation
even for a minute, supervisors sometimes deny permission for an additional toilet break, and
steep salary cuts are effected for even a day of absence from work.
19
The Maruti spokesman says the 7.5-minute break has been designed in a way that allows workers
just enough time to have tea, snack and use the restroom. Tea and snacks are laid out at 80 rest
areas adjacent to each work station, across the plant. "I'm not saying you will see anyone
strolling about during the tea break, but it is designed to be just sufficient," he says.
In the Gurgaon plant, the rushed break never seems to have been a problem. For more than 20
years, workers from Gurgaon used to be sent to Japan in batches of 60 each month to work in
Suzuki's plants for six months. More than 2,000 workers from the Gurgaon plant have worked in
Japanese factories fabled for the rigors of operations and processes. This practice was
discontinued before the Manesar plant went live, as India had managed to build world-class
industrial operations by then.
Another sticky point is the steep cuts in compensation effected for absenteeism. Workers quote
different figures -- Rs 1,200-1,500 -- as cuts for a day of leave, authorised or unauthorised. The
company spokesman says this impression is due to a misunderstood HR policy designed to
encourage 100% attendance. "For an employee whose attendance reward was Rs 2,000 per
month, each day of leave in a month reduced attendance reward by Rs 500 (25% of the
attendance reward) progressively. At three days of leave in a month, the attendance reward came
down to zero," he wrote in an emailed response.
Such cuts were subject to a cap of three leaves in a quarter. This meant if an employee took two
days of leave in a month, and didn't take any in the next two, the deducted salary would be
refunded at the end of the quarter. The company spokesman admits that the policy and it being
part of the performance-linked portion of the compensation was perhaps not adequately
explained to shop floor workers.
Many of these policies are dictated by the demands of the assembly line, where production halts
if even a single worker doesn't do his part in the specified time. There is little manoeuvring
room, and for this reason, all manufacturing firms place a premium on attendance. But such
policies tread a thin line between acceptability and outrage.
"Please understand sir, Maruti is our company. It is our family, it is our organisation," says Shiv
Kumar. "We want it to be the number one company always and we have given it our everything.
20
When they have asked for 100,000 cars, we have given them 120,000. But, the management
must also understand this: they cannot treat us badly and be vindictive."
It was issues such as these, and the alleged mistreatment, that led the Manesar workers to
demand a union to negotiate with the management. According to some accounts, the workers
first approached the office bearers of the Maruti Udyog Kamgar Union (MUKU), the Gurgaon-
based union recognised by the company as the union for all Maruti workers. The union took a
paternalistic view towards their younger colleagues from Manesar. They were told they were
young, they were new, and all this was par for the course.
This is where the divergence in accounts begin. Demands for a separate union seem to have
started towards end-2010 or early-2011. The company says it has "persuaded" the Manesar
workers to be part of the existing union and not form a new one. The workers say the company
first promised elections to the existing union in April and officials began warning workers
against forming a new union, a charge the company denies. Maruti chairman RC Bhargava was
unavailable for an interview last week.
In May, the company announced that elections to MUKU, with a proposed new chapter for
Manesar workers, would be held on July 18. (When this election eventually happened, Manesar
workers boycotted it, and a panel in the Gurgaon union that was seen as backed by the
management was thoroughly beaten by a rival panel.)
Manesar workers first struck work at 4 pm on June 4. Workers say the provocation was that
company officials were forcing workers to sign an affidavit stating they were happy to be with
the Gurgaon union and don't want a new one. The company spokesman denies this, and says the
provocation was that some workers were taking the signatures of others for the purpose of
forming a union and supervisors objected to it being done during work hours.
A day before, the workers had filed an application with the Haryana government labour
department to form a new union -- titled Maruti Suzuki Employees Union. On June 6, the
company summarily dismissed 11 workers for indiscipline and striking work. This included the
four office bearers of the proposed union. The strike went on till June 16, when the company
agreed to take back the 11 dismissed workers.
21
At this stage, the workers were being helped by the Gurudas Dasgupta-headed All India Trade
Union Congress (AITUC), a leftist trade union. "It is a positive development for the united trade
union movement," he told a newspaper reporter the day the first strike ended.
The cautious statement masked what the strike represented for AITUC and the trade union
movement in general. Nearly 400,000 workers are employed by about 1,000 companies that form
the Gurgaon-Manesar-Dharuhera-Rewari auto hub. Trade unions have had a mixed track record
here. AITUC and the Hind Mazdoor Sabha (HMS) are the two most prominent trade unions in
this belt. The general perception is that AITUC, like other Left-aligned trade unions, has a
propensity for violence, while the HMS is more conciliatory.
AITUC leaders claim that HMS colludes with managements, while HMS leaders say violent
trade unionism ultimately hurts workers and claim their functioning is more progressive and
suited to the needs of the modern worker. It is no secret that most company managements view
HMS as the lesser evil.
In the months prior to applying to form a union, Maruti Suzuki's Manesar workers had grown
close to AITUC. They frequently sought advice from Suresh Gaur, the union leader at the
adjoining Honda Motorcycles plant, who rose to prominence during the violent strikes at that
facility in 2005.
That union is affiliated to AITUC, of which, Gaur is a district committee member. AITUC
helped the Manesar workers file the application with the Haryana labour department, its leaders
met with department officials along with the Maruti workers, and at one point during the strike,
Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda met with AITUC's Dasgupta.
But after the first strike ended on June 16, the Manesar workers, according to a AITUC leader,
"no longer remained in our grip". A number of trade unions were now "advising" the striking
workers. Sonu, Shiv Kumar et al, listened to everyone, but confided in none. This was an astute
move.
The union at Suzuki Powertrain India, which is based in the same Manesar campus and shares
the assembly line, is affiliated to HMS, as is the union of Suzuki Motorcycles a few kilometres
22
away. Too much proximity towards AITUC would have made it difficult to secure the support of
these workers.
Apart from HMS and AITUC, leaders of Central Industrial Trade Union (CITU), New Trade
Union Initiative (NTUI), and numerous other trade unions started advising the Manesar group.
This included Mazdoor Kranti Parishad general secretary Amitava Bhattacharya, a key figure in
the 2007 strike at Kolkata's Hindustan Motors as well as Mamata Banerjee's agitation against the
land acquisition for the Tata Nano factory at Singur.
Who had how much influence is hard to ascertain, but everyone agrees that different people
enjoyed the confidence of the Maruti workers at different points. Sonu and Shiv Kumar both
maintain they have remained independent and plan to do so in the foreseeable future.
After the first strike ended on June 16, Maruti went into damage control mode. It brought in
external trainers and the spiritual organisation Brahmakumaris to organise sessions with the
workers, where they were encouraged to speak about their problems. "A process of healing had
to begin, and it was clear from the amount of feedback we received from that exercise that we
had been somewhat cut off from how they were feeling," says a company official.
Tenuous Peace
But the peace didn't last long, and the reasons are contested. Company officials claim that the 11
reinstated workers started flouting all shop floor norms and interfered in the plant's functioning
by appointing their own representatives at each bay and asking workers to obey their orders
instead of company supervisors and managers. Sonu Gujjar denies this, asking this reporter
instead: "Do you think we could do that?"
Shiv Kumar says company officials started victimising workers and threatened false cases
against leaders. "Show-cause notices, pay cuts, what have you," he says. According to company
sources, through August, workers started adopting a go-slow policy. Production fell from 1,200
cars a day to 700; on two days at the end of August, to 400. On those days, only 95 cars passed
the quality check, and the company says workers were sabotaging the cars.
On August 29, the company locked the factory and demanded workers sign a 'good-conduct
bond'. The company terminated the services of 18 trainees; and 44 regular workers were either
suspended or fired for "sabotaging production and deliberately causing quality problems". The
23
problems included "improper clamping of vehicle doors leading to them falling apart during
production, cutting of wiring harness in manufactured cars and dents on the body", the company
said in a statement then.
When asked if company had CCTV footage or other evidence of workers indulging in sabotage,
the company spokesperson said such evidence has been handed over to the Haryana government.
A senior Haryana government official familiar with the negotiations at Maruti said the company
has indeed handed over photographs of company officials being manhandled by workers, but had
only handed over details of sabotage and not evidence. He wasn't aware if such evidence has
been given to other departments or the police.
Workers say the allegations of sabotage are fabricated to force the good-conduct bond upon
them. The bond is essentially a four-sentence statement that reiterates to the worker that the
company has the power to dismiss those found indulging in such activities as "go-slow,
intermittent stoppage of work, stay-in-strike, work-to-rule, sabotage..." as per the existing
provisions governing the factory.
The workers refused to sign. They sat outside the factory and started the second round of protests
that would last 33 days. During this period, the company hired contract workers, got its
supervisors to work on the shop floor, ushered in the 170 workers who signed the bond, and
started production.
The company made about 600 cars a day, about half of regular capacity. By the end of the
second strike, it managed to have about 1,000 workers staying in the factory full-time and churn
out about 800 cars a day. This gave the management the upper hand, and the striking workers
started to tire. Doubts started emerging from their midst if such a long strike was warranted.
Negotiations at this stage were made complex by the varied political influences on workers. "We
would make some headway, they would agree, one of them would go to the restroom, make a
call, come back and say, 'sorry we didn't agree to anything'. It was going nowhere," a person
familiar with negotiations said. Another person who was present at the negotiations representing
another side, corroborated this version of events.
By this time, deep resentment had set in, and workers were truly agitated. This meant that the
leaders advocating a moderate view came to be favoured less, and those with a more radical
24
approach began to be favoured. But representatives of different trade unions ET spoke with all
agreed that ultimately, the Manesar boys took their own decisions and nobody could claim to
have had their ears for an extended period.
The two sides reached an agreement on October 1, 2011. Workers would sign the good-conduct
bond, the 18 trainees would be reinstated, and among the 44 regular workers, those who were
dismissed would now only be suspended, and internal investigations would proceed against
them.
The Haryana government official says they were sometimes frustrated by the management's
sudden moves and harsh approach. During the strike in June, while the labour department was
negotiating with the workers, the management went ahead and dismissed 11 people. "Sometimes
we felt they could be more lenient," he says..
But the company had been thrown into disarray by the strike. It was losing millions of dollars
each day and possibly critical market share at a time when rivals were launching small cars, such
as Honda's Brio and Hyundai's Eon. Besides, like Osamu Suzuki reminded everyone in Delhi, it
was not in the company's culture to tolerate indiscipline. "Not in Japan, not in India," he said.
When workers came back on October 3, 2011 the company took in 170 contract workers and
said the remaining would be taken back in phases as the plant scaled up gradually to capacity,
according to the spokesman. Workers viewed this as a move to victimise contract workers who
had participated in their strike.
They also term this as a violation of the October 1, 2011 agreement, even though all agreements
have been between the company and regular employees. The workers started demanding that all
contract workers and the 44 suspended workers be taken back. If the company can go back on its
word, we can renege on our terms as well, they say, even though the company hasn't technically
gone back on the agreement.
The plight of the contract workers have been a big factor in the ongoing agitation and the general
resurgence of trade union activity in the region. Maruti contracts workers through various labour
contractors and pay them as per the skills of the hired workers.
25
Workers are paid by contractors, not the company; other benefits, such as medical coverage, are
also incumbent upon the contractor. This could mean a contract worker doing the same work as a
regular employee on a Maruti assembly plant could make a third in compensation and be entitled
to no benefits.
The Maruti spokesman says the company ensures contract labourers hired by it are paid at least
the minimum wages. But this is done by asking the contractor to furnish proof and that makes it
easy for contractors to fudge. They often bill the company more than what they pay the labourer,
and pocket the difference, workers say.
This is not a Maruti-specific problem. Many auto companies and component makers function
with sometimes as much as 80% of their workforce as contract workers. This means less pay, no
benefits, no hassles brought on by the antiquated labour laws, and greater flexibility to adjust
production as per demand. This practice has spread in the auto hub and is causing a build-up of
resentment, union leaders say.
The workers of Maruti Suzuki's Manesar plant went on strike again on 7 October, 2011. This
time, they were joined by workers at the adjoining Suzuki Powertrain and Suzuki Motorcycles.
The strike at Suzuki Powertrain dealt a bodyblow to Suzuki's operations in India. It makes the
company's popular diesel engines and critical components of the petrol engine.
Within days, the disruption in the supply chain started choking production at the Gurgaon plant.
Maruti Suzuki had to completely stop production of popular models such as Swift and DZire,
just ahead of the Diwali festive season, when car sales soar each year. The gloom has spread to
the company's dealer network across the country, where festive shoppers are turning back due to
the long and now uncertain wait list.
The management worried for the safety of the factories as workers laid siege to them. Over the
weekend, the state administration pressed 4,000 cops into service and kept another 12,000 on
backup, as it moved in to shift the workers out of the plant following an order of the Punjab and
Haryana High Court.
Although the strike has now been declared illegal by the Haryana government, it has already
gone far beyond what anybody expected when workers first laid down tools at Manesar on June
26
4. For better or for worse, the company that ushered mass car ownership to India will never be
the same again.
On July 8th 2012, a fresh violence broke out in Maruti Suzuki’s manesar factory, which resulted
in the death of the plant’s HR General Manager, Mr. Awanish Kumar Dev. An investigation
carried out by Economic Times daily describes the reasons leading to this incident as follows:
In May 2012, the company suspended the workers' union president Ram Mehar Singh, accusing
him of manhandling a supervisor. While the union president and another union executive
committee member, Ram Bilas, who was also suspended in the same incident, were let off after
an oral apology, the company decided to launch disciplinary proceedings against an ordinary
worker, who faced similar charges. According to factory insiders, the tough stance of the
management against Jia Lal, an ordinary worker, in contrast to letting off leniently the union
heavyweights, had emboldened the workers. "It was clearly double standards of the company,"
says a Maruti worker, who was present at the scene of both incidents, involving the union office
bearers and the ordinary worker. "All the three employees were accused of manhandling their
supervisors, but the union office bearers were treated differently," says the worker, who
requested anonymity for fear of backlash from both the union and the management. The different
treatment for the same kind of offense has affected the morale of the Maruti worker.
Violence soon began, leaving a senior company executive dead and 96 more seriously injured.
As per Maruti's standing orders, which are applicable in all its labour disputes, the first step in a
labour indiscipline, is warning to the erring worker, followed by a chargesheet. Then the
employee is given a chance to prove innocence and if found guilty he/she could be suspended by
the company. And after due inquiry depending on the outcome he can be taken back into the
services or dismissed by the company. In Ram Mehar Singh's case, the workers allege that the
norms were overlooked, resulting in his re-induction into the company with an oral apology.
"Ordinary workers were treated differently from the union bosses. This created mistrust within
the workforce," says another Maruti worker, who asked not to be named.
According to Maruti Suzuki, the withdrawal of suspensions against the union president and
executive committee member was a "goodwill response". In a written statement, the company
told ET, "Two workers were suspended in May 2012. Subsequently, after discussions with the
27
Union and based on their verbal assurance, the suspensions were revoked. This was to give them
an opportunity towards building a positive and participative work environment, as a goodwill
response from the management." Maruti executives say that the suspension issue involving the
worker (Jia Lal) was also handled with a positive and supportive alternative of keeping the
‘suspension in abeyance’, till the next day. The workers however, chose to resort to barbaric
violence.
It is found that the company failed to maintain agreements signed with workers on the creation of
the Works Committee and the Grievance Committee, which was part of the October 19, 2011,
agreement. Both committees have not been formed yet. While the company may be right as the
workers' union did not want to allow alternative unions develop within Maruti, the formation of
these committees would have increased the trust of common workers who form the backbone of
its manufacturing operations.
The firm defended its role in implementing the agreements. "Except for these two pending
committees, all others that are part of the tripartite settlement have been sorted out," says a
Maruti spokesman. "MSIL management made its best efforts to convince the workers' union to
nominate their representatives, even requesting support from the District Labour Commissioner
Office, Gurgaon. But the workers representatives vehemently opposed the formation of the two
committees. We have even finalised and nominated management representatives on both the
committees," the spokesman says.
Sources: The Economic Times (Special Report), October 17, 2011; and “Maruti’s Leniency to
Union Bosses Reason for Rift Among Workers”, The Economic Times (Investigation), August 6,
2012.
**********
28
Sources used for Preparing this Note
Aditya Bhattacharjea (2009): “The Effects of Employment Protection Legislation on Indian
Manufacturing,” Economic and Political Weekly, May 30.
Alakh N Sharma (2006): “Flexibility, Employment and Labour Market Reforms in India,”
Economic and Political Weekly, May 27.
Anwarul Hoda and Durgesh K. Rai (2015): Labour Regulations and Growth of
Manufacturing and Employment in India: Balancing Protection and Flexibility;
ICRIER Working Paper 298.
Anwarul Hoda and Durgesh K. Rai (2017): Labour Regulations in India: Improving the
Social Security Framework; ICRIER Working Paper 331.
Arup Mitra (2010): ‘India's competitive edge from low wages’, The Economic Times,
September16.
Badri Narayanan G (2005): “A Note on Labour Flexibility Debate in India”, Economic and
Political Weekly, September 24.
CNBC-TV18 (2009): “What's Causing the Labour Unrest in India?” October 21.
Haryana pushes for labour reforms, Assembly passes 4 Bills, The Times of India, March 30,
2016.
K.R. Shyam Sundar (2005): “Labour Flexibility Debate in India: A Comprehensive Review
and Some Suggestions”, Economic and Political Weekly, May 28-June 4.
Labour Reforms in Rajasthan, http://resurgent.rajasthan.gov.in/investing-in-rajasthan/labour-
reforms
Poonam Gupta, Rana Hasan and Utsav Kumar (2008): “What Constrains Indian
Manufacturing?” ICRIER Working Paper No.211, March.
President clears Madhya Pradesh labour reforms, Business Standard, November 25, 2015
Shyam Sundar (2015): Industrial Conflict in India in the Post-Reform Period Who Said All
Is Quiet on the Industrial Front?; Economic & Political Weekly, January 17.
Sunanda Sen, Byasdeb Dasgupta (2008): “Labour under Stress: Findings from a Survey,”
Economic and Political Weekly, January 19.
Sunil Kumar (2015): Rising tide of Labour Reforms in India;
http://www.manupatrafast.in/NewsletterArchives/listing/ILU%20RSP/2015/Oct/Rising%20t
ide%20of%20Labour%20Reforms%20in%20India.pdf
Supriya Roy Chowdhury (2004): “Globalisation and Labour”, Economic and Political Weekly,
January 3.
Recommended Readings
Maya John (2012): “Workers’ Discontent and Form of Trade Union Politics”, Economic and
Political Weekly, January 7.
Atulan Guha (2009): “Labour Market Flexibility: An Empirical Inquiry into Neoliberal
Propositions”, Economic and Political Weekly, May 9.
29
Kaushik Basu, Henrik Horn, Lisa Roman and Judith Shapiro (2003): “International Labor
Standards”, Blackwell Publishing Limited.
Video Link
1) India: 150 million workers on strike! (7.47 Minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gcHZEohm4g
2) Truth vs Hype: Maruti - Trouble at the plant (20.15 Minutes)
http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/truth-vs-hype/truth-vs-hype-maruti-trouble-at-the-
plant/214402
3) Maruti's Manesar plant: The problems behind labour unrest (5.51 Minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmSIYrkk2dE
4) Why Honda Workers Are on an Indefinite Hunger Strike at Jantar Mantar (8.05
Minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXskgOBEhWg
30
India’s Services Economy – What lies ahead?
Theme of the Session
Over the last two decades services sector has emerged as largest and
fastest growing sector of Indian economy. A growing ‘tertiarisation’
of structure of production and employment has been taking place in
India. While other sectors experienced phases of deceleration,
stagnation and growth, services sector has shown a uniform growth
trends overtime. A major part of decline in share of primary sector in
GDP was picked up by service sector. This is a unique feature
witnessed by India and has given rise to a debate whether a growth
model heavily based on service sector growth is sustainable. Many
observers have argued that in a low income economy like India a
larger share of services in GDP is unnatural. In this context this
session, after tracking the growth, causes and contribution of the
services growth for India’s economic progress, addresses deeply the
question of sustainability of the services-led growth. It also
explores the possibility of positioning India as ‘world’s services
provider’ like China has positioned it as ‘world’s factory’.
Significance of Services Sector in World Economy
2011-12 19 23 (17) 59
2012-13 18 23 (17) 59
2013-14 18 23 (17) 60
2014-15 17 23 (17) 61
2015-16 15 23 (18) 62
2016-17 15 23 (18) 62
0
Indonesia
Mexico
USA
Brazil
Sri Lanka
Germany
China
India
Malaysia
Thailand
Financial Attractiveness People skills and availability Business environment Overall Index
ICT service exports (% of service exports)
Performance of India’s Services Sector: Some Indicators
The Great ‘Manufacturing Vs Services’ Debate
Winner of the 2001 Nobel prize for economics, Joseph Stiglitz, when asked
“Can a country of India's size develop without manufacturing being a
major contributor?”
India’s position close to China in Services…..but far away in
manufacturing
Share in World Export of Manufacturing Products (%)
This lecture note was prepared by the Instructor (Sthanu R Nair, Indian Institute of Management
Kozhikode) for the sole purpose of student learning. It is nothing but proper arranging/ordering
of relevant parts from the sources indicated at the end of the note with data/photo additions.
Please do not circulate this note in any public platform or share to others without the Instructor’s
permission.
1
1. Significance of Services Sector for India
Services sector has emerged as largest and fastest growing sector in global economy. The
sector provides more than 60% of global output and employment. Share of services in world
transactions has been increasing. Worldwide, FDI is shifting away from manufacturing sector
towards service sector. In line with global trend, this sector has grown rapidly in India, especially
since 1990s.
Currently services sector is the fastest growing sector of the Indian economy. A growing
‘tertiarisation’ of structure of production and employment has been taking place in India. Since
1990s, services sector emerged as major sector of economy both in terms of growth rates and
share in GDP. While other sectors experienced phases of deceleration, stagnation and growth,
services sector has shown a uniform growth trends overtime. A major part of decline in share of
primary sector in GDP was picked up by service sector. This is considered to be a unique feature
witnessed by India.
Growth pattern in services sector has not been uniform across all services. In post-1990s
business services (which includes IT), communications & banking sectors experienced
maximum growth. Growth of trade and communications increased consistently over the decades.
2
In the first half of the current decade, majority of the service segments witnessed high growth.
This trend clearly indicates that apart from ITES (which comes under business services), many
other sectors have made credible contributions to the new found dynamism of the service sector
(See following Table).
3
Table 1: Distribution of the workforce across economic sectors in India 2017 (%)
Agriculture Industry Services
2007 53.68 20.62 25.7
2008 53.16 20.72 26.13
2009 52.38 21.33 26.3
2010 51.52 21.81 26.68
2011 48.8 23.45 27.75
2012 47 24.36 28.64
2013 46.66 23.79 29.55
2014 45.52 23.94 30.54
2015 44.36 23.8 31.74
2016 43.44 23.72 32.84
2017 42.74 23.79 33.48
Source: World Bank (https://www.statista.com/statistics/271320/distribution-of-the-
workforce-across-economic-sectors-in-india/)
4
Figure: Leading Exporters of Commercial Services
(annual % change)
Hong Kong, China
Netherlands
Spain
India
Japan
2013
China
France 2012
Germany
UK
USA
‐10 ‐5 0 5 10 15
5
3. Explanations for the Boom in the Services Sector in India:
The factors contributing to the enormous success of the services sector in India can be
explained by referring to the case of India’s success in IT-ITES sector.
(b) Inexpensive overall package – Foreign clients do not, however, base their decisions
on pay alone. Their calculations are based on the total costs arising from a foreign venture.
Additional costs are incurred for telecommunications infrastructure, management and the
establishment of a workplace. Even factoring in all such additional costs, India offers most
inexpensive package compared to other offshore locations.
(c) High quality standards – High numbers of IT companies that are certified according
to internationally recognised quality standards (Six Sigma, CMM Level 5 and ISO 9000) are
from India. Of the software companies worldwide with a Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
Level 5 rating - highest rating that a software company can attain – majority are from India
(d) Population at working age is high - The current demographic status indicates that a
large percentage (almost 45%) of Indians are under 25 years of age. This pool of manpower, if
tapped correctly can sustain the cost advantage.
(g) Global network of Indian emigrants - Indian expatriates in the US made a major
contribution. They established first contacts in order to seal international contracts and they
continue to cultivate these contacts. In India itself the managers are also often returnees with
6
professional experience gained in the US. Example: 95% of international companies in STPs in
Bangalore are run by Indians who have lived and worked abroad, mostly in US
(h) High income elasticity of demand for services: That is as our income increases we
tend to spend a greater part of our income for the consumption of services than for food and
other manufactured goods (see following table).
1950-51 12.5
1960-61 12.5
1970-71 14.6
1980-81 16.8
1990-91 20.9
1999-00 27.2
2008-09 41.1
2014-15 48.9
(i) Splintering (means Outsourcing) – Means contracting out business operations that
were done internally by individual firms. Splintering results in an increase in net input demand
for services from industrial sector. In their drive to becoming more competitive, manufacturing
units increasingly outsourced non-core functions such as accounting or payroll management,
security guards, drivers, canteen staff to other firms thus giving rise to a flourishing services
industry.
7
context, software piracy is a serious problem. According to estimates software piracy is low in
India.
(k) Scalability – ability to handle large projects – For example, Largest Chinese
companies in the IT-ITES sector namely Neusoft and VanceInfo has 20,000 and 14,111
employees respectively. In contrast, the employee strength of top three Indian players namely
TCS, Infosys and Wipro respectively are 385,809 (as on June 2017), 200,364 (as on March
2017) and 160,000.
The three largest Indian IT players have a share of over 46% in IT based Indian export
revenues. They grow faster and are more profitable than the smaller suppliers. In China, 3 largest
offshore software developers have a share of less than 15% in offshore market. Remaining share
is accounted for by a large number of smaller suppliers. This highly fragmented supplier
structure is a disadvantage as customers wish to have reliable, high-quality service providers –
these usually being large suppliers.
(m) Easy option – For many entrepreneurs, services are an easier segment to enter
because they usually require less physical infrastructure than industry and are subject to fewer
controls (e.g. restrictive labour policies not applicable). The profitability of sunrise sectors like
IT/ITES and telecommunications was vastly greater than that of older manufacturing industries,
like textiles or steel. The cost arbitrage between India and the markets that offered offshoring
contracts has been massive, and it has been routine for IT firms to enjoy a 30 per cent profit
margin on sales-a level unthinkable for manufacturing companies. In telecommunications, also,
even though the policy challenges have been substantive and repetitive, the arrival of mobile
telephony, vast untapped demand, and a sharp reduction in costs as the economies of scale have
kicked in, have allowed a profitability that has made access to capital easy.
One study compared the growth of industries that are more dependent upon
infrastructure, have greater financial needs, and are more labour intensive. They find that, in the
post-1991 period, companies that were above the median in terms of infrastructure intensiveness
grew 10 per cent less than those which were below the median; those which were above the
median in terms of labour intensiveness grew 19 per cent less than those which were below the
median. That is, the costs of poor infrastructure and rigid labour laws were significant
8
differentiators. To the extent that services firms have lower infrastructure dependence, and
restrictive labour laws do not apply to them, they have been in a better position to grow than
their counterparts in the industrial sector.
The answer seems to be yes, as will be argued below. As new service sectors get onto the
growth turnpike, more services will be added to the list of rapidly growing sectors in the
economy.
(a) Changing Consumption patterns: Till the liberalization of the early 1990s, the trend
in private final consumption expenditure was a straightforward one - the share of services in the
total consumption basket rose by around 3 percentage points each decade. However, the share of
services in private consumption has increased at a faster rate (up to 10 percentage points) after
1990-91 reforms. A shift in the consumption pattern of this nature indicates that the demand-
side impetus to growth in services will continue. Indeed, it will only get stronger (See Box 1).
Box 1: Rising Consumption of Services – A Story from Beauty Industry
No jazzy music. No flashy lights. No waiting lounges stacked with magazines. Only single‐room ‘beauty
parlours' where clients sat huddled awaiting their turn, while the ones getting the works done sat with
their faces slathered in gooey pastes or hair pulled back into embarrassing knots with the others looking
on. So much for discreet beauty treatments. The alternative was probably to walk into a five‐star hotel
9
and get services done at their posh fragrant salons and of course shell out a lot extra. There weren't
enough mid‐level salons to bridge the gap between the two and that's when Veena thought of starting
Naturals. The first salon came up on Khader Nawaz Khan Road in Chennai in 2000. “It was a way to keep
myself occupied. At that point Chennai mostly had small parlours and many people weren't comfortable
walking into a big hotel, so we thought a salon such as this would be a good idea,” says Veena
Kumaravel.
“Initially funding was difficult. Even banks wouldn't fund salons. It was a hassle those days to procure
salon equipment. The furniture for the salon was imported from Italy. It's easier now,” says Veena
adding, “We broke even after three years and then opened our second salon in Anna Nagar.” More
outlets were opened across the city, the business grew bigger and required more help. So, Veena's
husband C.K. Kumaravel, who already had his own business, joined her. And the fairytale continues as
the salon has just launched its 128th outlet in the country. It is probably the only salon from Chennai to
have such a wide presence. So far Naturals has branches in several cities in India. “We are also catering
to smaller towns..... These are good markets for us as there is not much competition there. It is amazing
how beauty conscious people are these days. Television has penetrated their living rooms and they
aspire to be what they see on TV,” adds Kumaravel.
The couple recalls that till about a few decades ago going to a parlour was considered taboo. When
Naturals came up with unisex salons, the conservative Chennaiite wasn't too comfortable with it. But
gradually things began to change. And most men stopped going to ‘barber shops' and got introduced to
the world of salons. Veena believes that this industry suffers from misnomers. “Earlier people thought
that those who were not academically inclined would take up this profession. But today we get
graduates approaching us for training,” smiles Veena.
Naturals have their own training academies in T. Nagar, Coimbatore and Siliguri and shortly plan to
open in Bengaluru and Hyderabad as well. “By opting for the franchise model we ensured the proper
functioning of the salons because it was getting difficult for us to handle everything on our own,” she
adds. Most of the franchisees are women and Veena and Kumaravel are happy that they have
empowered more than 600 women and provided about 15,000 jobs.
Following the success of Naturals, the duo wanted to establish a high‐ end salon and in 2010 Page 3 was
launched. “We tied up with Kerastase and Keraskin for treatments. This salon focuses on a different line
of treatments and products altogether,” says Veena.
What's next? “We're aiming at a pan‐Indian presence.”, they say.
(b) Exports: Since liberalization began, India's services exports have increased 15-fold.
Exports of business services, mostly IT/ITES, have increased at over 25 per cent per year in the
past decade, a record unmatched anywhere in the world. As a result, while India's share in global
services export has reached 3.3% in 2015 against 1.6% in the case of manufacturing goods.
Services exports account for 38 per cent of India's total exports of goods and services.
Since the size of global software and BPO market was around US$ 385.3 and 24.6 billion
respectively, NASSCOM estimates that the addressable market is large enough to leave enough
headroom for growth for several years. Over time, a host of new service areas are also likely to
10
grow. For instance, the USA stands to save over US$ 1.5 billion annually if only 10 per cent of
US patients choose to undergo medical treatment overseas for just 15 low-risk procedures. It has
been calculated that the scope for providing medical services in India for nationals of other
countries can be compared to what has been achieved in software services.
(c) The retail sector: As India's middle class has grown in both size and proportion,
retailing has grown from its tiny beginnings. India’s retail market is expected to increase on the
back of factors like rising incomes and lifestyle changes by middle class and increased digital
connectivity. India is expected to become the world’s fastest growing e-commerce market,
driven by robust investment in the sector and rapid increase in the number of internet users.
(d) Entertainment: Over the past few, the entertainment and media sector has grown
significantly and will continue to grow. Within this, animation and gaming are new phenomena,
emerging as a serious business just a few years ago. The Bollywood film industry is likely to
grow including tie-ups with Hollywood involving the co-production of films.
(e) International Financial Services: With India integrating into the global economy, the
two-way flow of money has involved from being not just payment for trade but also money
being invested in physical capital as well as in stocks and bonds. Moreover, with Indian firms
buying firms in other countries, there has also been an outflow of capital as well as substantial
fees paid for a variety of financial services. According to the Report of the High Powered Expert
Committee on Making Mumbai an International Financial Centre (MIFC), the best way to look
at this transition and its impact, is to look at the trade-to-GDP ratio to begin with. It has now
risen to around 40 per cent.
Based on the projected size of exports/Imports, FII and FDI inflows, the fees paid by
Indian firms to investment bankers overseas, etc., the MIFC projects the total external flows over
the next decade. It then works out what this means in terms of brokerage fees, currently paid to
financial firms located outside the country. Based on a weighted average paid to merchant
bankers for different services, MIFC calculates the total fees that India stands to gain if Mumbai
is to become an international financial centre. The estimate for 2015 was US$ 48 billion, based
on the medium-low projections of overall flows.
11
(f) Banking Sector:
The impact of the spread of banking on GDP growth is well established. It should be
remembered that this contribution took place when the vast majority of Indians remained
unbanked, For instance, National Sample Survey data reveal that over half the 45 million
farmers in the country have no access to credit, either informal or formal. And of these, just
around half have access to formal credit. All told, around three-quarters of farmers have no
access to formal credit.
Even in the case of the top-most income quartile, less than half of those who take loans
take them from the banking sector. This suggests that bank formalities may be too cumbersome,
or credit risk assessments too stringent for most people. Given that around half the loans taken
by those in the lowest income quartile are at interest rates of over 36 per cent per year, the scope
for growth in the banking sector is clearly large. Not surprisingly then, even the largest Indian
banks are quite small when compared on a global scale: only one bank, the State Bank of
India, figures in the top 100 global banks in terms of assets. Therefore, it can be safely asserted
that if greater financial inclusion is to be achieved, the growth of the banking sector, and its
contribution to GDP, will have to increase manifold.
Finally, as the exposure of Indians to other financial instruments (life insurance, mutual
funds, equity investments, microfinance) is limited, vast potential lies in these areas. Perhaps the
present situation will change due to the entry of aggressive players from the private sector.
(g) Education:
The education industry in India has been growing strongly with major contribution from
K-12 (pronounced "k twelve"/"k to twelve" is a designation for the sum of primary and
secondary education) and higher education segments. The Indian education industry is in its
development stage. The numbers of junior basic schools are highest in the country and there is a
strong need to set up higher secondary schools as well as colleges with a focus on IT education.
The Government has set up many ICT schools but still more than fifty percent of the market is
untapped which shows an opportunity for private players. In respect to the country's population
and number of students, trained teacher's ratio is low which emphasizes the need of training
institutes. The growing IT industry in India is driving IT education and has enhanced the need
for training market as well as enhanced teaching techniques. With over 50% of the population
12
falling in the age group of 15-64 years, with a median age between 20-30 years, India presents an
attractive market for the higher education sector.
The rapidly expanding road network, with a proper system of national highways, has
speeded up truck movement by 50 per cent and more. The improved traffic and operating ratios
achieved by the railways, and the large investments planned for expanding the system (like the
dedicated freight corridors from the north to ports in the west and east) mean that there will be
active competition between road and rail. The new policies of the government like building of
new air ports in many parts of the country and expansion of air connectivity through UDAN
scheme could sustain the growth of civil aviation industry in the medium to long-term.
Thanks to telecommunication revolution, telecom and internet density has grown by leaps
and bounds because prices have been cut to the bone, with local and long distance calls costing a
tiny fraction of what they used to. A supporting role has been played by the steady drop in
handset prices. The result is that the scope for application of ICT has expanded in many areas
including agriculture sector. For instance, due to a a unique mobile agri-information service
provided by start-up company IFFCO Kisan Sanchar (IKSL) the yield of the famers has
improved significantly (see Box 1). The service allows farmers to connect in real time with
agriculture and veterinary experts, who provide ready solutions for most farm-based
problems. More than 8.5 million Indian farmers are now part of this agri-telephony network.
This example suggests that farmers in India need information, indeed on daily basis. Models
such as the one built by IKSL has just scratched the surface and there is a long way to go. Such
kind of technology platform can help in bringing awareness among farmers. When compared to
technology in agriculture in the advanced countries, we are still far behind. There, farmers pitch
their problems to companies and entrepreneurs and pay for the solutions. In the Indian context, it
is a huge opportunity waiting for entrepreneurs and companies. They can create a sustainable
business by taking ICT to millions of farmers in India.
13
Box 1: Dialling in for Better Farms, Crop and Profit
B L Linge Gowda, a 58‐year‐old farmer in rural Karnataka, is a happy man. The quantity of crops grown
on his fields have doubled, his cows produce more milk and he has more free time to spend with his
grandchildren. This turnaround in fortunes came in after Gowda signed on to a unique mobile agri‐
information service provided by start‐up company IFFCO Kisan Sanchar (IKSL).
The service allows him to connect in real time with agriculture and veterinary experts, who provide
ready solutions for most farm‐based problems. More than 8.5 million Indian farmers are now part of this
agri‐telephony network launched by startup company IKSL, a joint venture between Star Global
Resources, founded by entrepreneur Ranjan Sharma, mobile phone operator Airtel and Indian Farmers
Fertiliser Co‐operative (IFFCO).
Ranjan Sharma with a Farmer
Sharma, who has over three decades of experience in the fertiliser industry, launched his own venture
Star Global Resources in 2005. His idea was to use insights in farming gained during his career, to build a
dedicated information service using mobile telephony as a medium.
In a pilot project conducted at Barabanki in Uttar Pradesh in 2006, he assessed the information needs of
farmers and began sending them daily messages on their mobile phones on subjects ranging from
availability of power and seeds to tips on handling crop diseases, veterinary problems and solutions to
increase the productivity.
The pilot was a tremendous success and he found that the farmers were indeed interested in daily
information. Buoyed by the success, he decided to team up with fertiliser giant IFFCO, which has nearly
5.5 crore Indian farmers as its members through a network of 45,000 co‐operative societies, to spread
this idea all over the country.
This strong support from the farmer community has helped IKSL post profits from year one. “There is no
dearth of agriculture‐related information in our various universities, Krishi Vigyan Kendras, Central and
state research institutes,” says Sharma. According to him, there is a wide gap between the knowledge
farmers need and what they actually know.
Quick to see the value in this platform, Bharti Airtel joined the JV in 2008, agreeing to buy 24%
shareholding in IKSL at an enterprise value of 250 crore. As a result , Airtel has gained around 8.5 million
new customers in rural areas till now, said Sharma. “This kind of strategy is significant in the larger
global context for the company” said an Airtel executive.
14
IKSL offers five voice messages every day in 12 languages across 19 telecom circles. Gowda has learnt
rainwater harvesting techniques through this platform. “The messages are completely customised as per
the region the farmer belongs to. In case the farmers do not understand the message, or have queries of
any kind, they can call the toll free helpline number and discuss it with the local representative,”
explained a senior manager for content development at IKSL. The company also conducts weekly quiz
programmes with questions focused on the subjects covered in the messages and gives farmers prizes,
thereby assessing the receptiveness of the farmers.
(j) Cultural goods:
Cultural goods and services are special goods which carry symbolic, aesthetic, artistic or
cultural value. The main components of trade in cultural goods are: Cultural and natural
heritage (e.g. pieces of historical, archaeological interest, antiques); performance and
celebration (e.g. music); visual arts and crafts (e.g. original sculptures, articles of jewellery in
gold or silver, articles in woven fabrics); books and press; audiovisual and interactive media
(e.g. cinematographic films and video games); design and creative services (e.g. architecture
plans and drawings).
In 2013, the global trade of cultural goods amounted to US$190.5 billion, representing
US$212.8 billion for exports and US$168.3 billion for imports. The value of world exports of
cultural goods almost double in 2013 compared to 2004, which was US$108.4 billion.
Interestingly, exports of cultural goods were less impacted by the economic and financial
crisis of 2008. From 2008 to 2009, exports of cultural goods decreased by 13.5% compared to a
decrease of 22.4% for the exports of total goods. Opening a country’s economy to international
trade in cultural goods and services could be a factor of economic growth. For example, over the
last 20 years China has enjoyed double-digit economic growth, and its role in exporting
cultural goods has become preponderant. Importantly, in this digital era, products can travel
physically but also virtually via the Internet.
15
According to UNESCO study titled The Globalisation of Cultural Trade: A shift in
consumption during the last ten years, India together with Turkey and Malaysia has emerged as
leading exporters of cultural goods and services. Currently, India is within the top 10
exporters (5th position. In 2004, India was in 8th position) of cultural goods and services. And
along with China, India is a net exporter of cultural goods. Interestingly, with the exception of
Mexico, all countries with a significantly high level of exports of cultural goods are in Asia, led
by China, then India, Malaysia and Thailand. Moreover, Asian countries have emerged as strong
exporters of cultural goods overtime. In 2004, South and East Asian countries (China, India and
Singapore) accounted for only 23% of exports of cultural goods within the top 10, which at the
time was dominated by Europe and North America, accounting for a share of 77% of total
exports. By 2013, the top 10 exporting countries were equally distributed among Asia and
Europe and North America, holding 49% and 51% of shares of cultural goods exports
respectively.
Top 20 exporters of cultural goods
Category India's China's
Rank (2013) Rank (2013)
Cultural and natural heritage 20 10
Performance and celebration - 3
Visual arts and crafts 3 1
Books and Press 15 4
Audiovisual and interactive media - 1
Design and creative services 10 6
India is third largest exporters of visual arts and crafts domain. Visual arts and crafts
made up most of the world trade in cultural goods from 2004 to 2013, growing by 185% over
this period. India also witnessed high exports of jewellery. Embroidery made of cotton or
manmade fibres belongs to one of the strongest cultural export sectors of India: handloom or
crafts in textiles. The United Arab Emirates, USA, China and a small number of other countries
such as Nigeria and Malaysia are the most important importer of Indian cultural goods. These
facts suggests with right set of policies India can develop additional sources of services sector
growth in the various cultural goods and services domain listed above, thereby create more jobs,
income and exports opportunities.
16
5. Factors determining the sustainability of IT-ITES growth:
India attained competitive strength in offshore IT services with 65% share of the global
offshore market and 46% share of global BPO industry
The scope for future expansion continues to be large as only 10% of potentially
addressable global IT/ITES market has been realized
However, the critical question that emerges in this context is: What would make India a
global leader in IT products segment as in the case of IT services? A combination of risk
capital, knowledge/entrepreneurship, ecosystem and government policy can pitch Indian
companies into leadership position in IT products (see Boxes 2 & 3).
17
controls can reap benefits. The ministry should not only protect public sector navratna
companies, but also ensure that private SMEs can benefit from set-offs of global tenders.
(ii) Government should apply more technology. Directly or indirectly, government will
be much bigger than the private sector. E-governance projects often explicitly rule out
involvement of local niche software players, even if the company has credible deployments.
Qualification criterion like independent revenue (not the company’s total revenue) is a difficult
hurdle to cross for many SMEs. Setting aside certain percentage of projects for Indian SME
product companies in e-governance projects is a must to encourage local innovation.
Box 2: From Lobbying to Guiding – The Role of NASSCOM
Industry body NASSCOM, best known for its role as lobbyist for the country's offshoring industry, is now
seeking to recreate that success in nurturing emerging companies. It has launched a series of initiatives
from mentoring services, technology events, annual listing of the top‐50 software product firms and
launch of the Rs. 60‐crore Innovation Fund for very early stage investments in technology firms all
aimed at catalysing the start‐up ecosystem in the country.
For young start‐up companies, networking with other entrepreneurs, finding the right talent to hire, and
closing deals with investors are crucial components in building a new company. Mentor groups are seen
as enablers, who can lead the way in meeting these targets. One business account that we got from a
NASSCOM recommendation is growing to thousands of dollars each year. Entrepreneurs expect to see
more of an evangelizing role from NASSCOM as they grow start‐ups from revenue levels of $5 million to
$100 million or more.
Emerge 50, an annual ranking of software product firms by NASSCOM works as a funnel to showcase
emerging technologies. By channelling its efforts on building software product capability, NASSCOM is
aiming to ride the wave of innovation arising out of multiple triggers such as expansion of the mobile
market, launch of the UID project, which is creating a market for new tech‐enabled services and
products, as well as new technological trends like cloud computing.
Industry watchers say entrepreneurship, across developed markets, has benefited from sustained
advocacy and policy support. This ranges from abolition of sales tax on e‐commerce transactions in the
US to sustained policy support, which has created big telecom firms such as Huawei in China. If you go to
the Silicon Valley, bigger firms such as Cisco have always taken interest in product firms.
18
Other start‐ups are looking to apex bodies to help them solve problems such as access to the right
talent. In India, most people are not willing to work for start‐ups (and instead choose to work in large
MNCs). As a result, of that innovation created by Indians is happening in (such) large MNCs. IT bodies
such as NASSCOM and other networks need to encourage the Indian talent to work in start‐ups.
Accessing global markets is another area that start‐ups are seeking ecosystem support for. Start‐ups
don't have marketing budgets, so introduction to customers by networks such as NASSCOM provides
visibility. Affordability is another issue that entrepreneurs face while engaging with networking groups.
For instance, at elite networking events, bootstrapping entrepreneurs can find it difficult to pony up fees
of Rs.5,000 and more for an evening's session. It is exactly such issues that NASSCOM attempts to
address.
As the apex body now aims to be the wind in the sails of grass‐root entrepreneurs industry watchers say
NASSCOM must enhance its inherent advantages. It has its strength in terms of having influence on
policies. They can help in building an affordable and intelligent ecosystem in which start‐ups can work
smoothly with easier regulations.
(c) Capital: Access to institutional finance is yet another area that needs to be addressed.
The number of VC and PE investments has grown substantially but the value of these funds are
small and their portfolio strategies limits their interest, investment and hence the development of
key technologies. Software product entrepreneurs should have easy access to collateral-free
funding. IP valuation for collateral is an accepted practice in all developed world and Indian
banks must be educated and encouraged to adopt the practice. Credible external benchmarking
can also help Indian software product companies to fortify their true claims and challenge the
competitors. Finally, angel investors should be free to open up their wallets even more. 13-14
deals in a year is low. We need every angel to do at least 5 deals.
(d) Ecosystem: A mature ecosystem, Sillicon Valley for instance, should be able to
generate start-ups in new areas every 10 to 15 years. We went through a cycle where failure was
not accepted and risk taking was an issue. We as a society were always focused on self reliance
and import substitution. If you look like product companies that are world leaders now,
Microsoft or Oracle, nobody paid attention to them in their first few years. And that was
important as you need time to privately evolve. In India, all that is getting developed now. There
is angel funding. Money is not a major issue now. We are starting to see a lot of experienced
people coming out and starting up ventures, especially from large MNCs.
Also, assembling talent from other sources takes time. We have to get that foundation
ready. Once we get going in the Sillicon Valley, we draw from a pool of talent from even giants
like Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. Don Valentine, the founder of Sequoia drew talent from
19
Sillicon Velley (IBM and Xerox PARC). He was the original investor in Apple and then Cisco
and Google. Their foundational companies were IBM and Xerox.
Box 3: Higher Productivity will be a Dream Unless Mindset Changes
Sridhar Vembu
Indian IT industry is at a crossroads. The professional services model is no longer fuelling the growth it
once did. Productivity, as measured by revenue per employee, has long been stagnant among Indian IT
majors.
The leading Indian IT powerhouses bring in $45,000 per employee per year while for the second‐and
third‐tier firms, it sinks to $30,000 per year. Compare that to Google and Facebook, which make
upwards of $1 million per employee per year in revenue, and enterprise software companies like
Oracle bring in $350,000 per employee per year. In Indian IT, these numbers are a distant dream. They
don't have to be.
Yet, higher productivity will remain a distant dream unless there is a wholesale cultural and mindset
change. Google and Facebook are rewarded with high productivity because of their flexible cultures that
empower employees and their intrinsic risk taking attitude. Indian companies, by contrast, have very
conservative top‐down corporate cultures. The services business model also encourages bloat, and the
bloat becomes a core part of a culture.
In a product company, all our incentives are aligned to use people as efficiently as possible. In a
services business model, the more headcount a project can justify, the more money it makes, which
makes it difficult for a project manager to use resources efficiently.
At Zoho, we resisted the easy allure of the services business in our early days (in the late 1990s),
instead choosing to forge a path based on creating compelling products. It was a difficult path at first,
because there just wasn't any expertise in building products in India and penetrating a market with new
products is never easy.
After a slow start, we have emerged as one of the leading software product companies coming out of
India. Our productivity is not yet on par with our global peers, but it is still substantially ahead of Indian
services companies. We have set ourselves the goal of reaching global productivity levels in the next 5
years.
How do we do it? It all comes down to culture. We turn every piece of received wisdom in Indian IT on
its head. We do not care about certifications like CMM. Our recruitment model focuses on real ability
20
and passion than on degrees and paper credentials. We are proud to say that most of our people
actually were originally rejected by the major IT companies in India ‐‐ their loss was our gain.
We do not have the rigid hierarchy, endless meetings, and a slavish devotion to process that
characterise the life of most IT professionals. Instead, we emphasise flexibility, adaptation and cultivate
a certain disregard for authority in our people ‐ we absolutely prohibit ancestor worship in our
company! Our promotions are based on demonstrated performance, not on the number of years spent
doing it. It is not uncommon for relatively "junior" people in positions of authority in our firm.
We do not force anyone to stay with us; we follow the same "at will" employment rule that is common
in the US, meaning that anyone can leave us anytime, with absolutely no notice to us if they choose. Yet
our attrition rate is among the lowest. That is not for lack of opportunity: our employees all know that
their experience at Zoho is very valuable, but they voluntarily choose to stay because of the culture and
opportunity.
We believe the path ahead for Indian IT is in embracing more flexibility and innovation, discarding
ideas that may have worked in the past but no longer work in today's age. The path to productivity lies
in empowering employees to reach their full human potential.
Source: Authored by Sridhar Vembu. He is founder and CEO of Zoho Corporation. Zoho is a software‐as‐
a‐service (Saas) provider that has been profitable from the get‐go and, with its roughly $400 million
annual revenues. They are the makers of the online Zoho Office Suite as well as several business
applications. Sridhar Vembu has been in the news not only for creating one of the first online (Cloud
Computing) office suites as a company, but also for the unique staffing practices of ZOHO which hires
economically disadvantaged high school graduates and puts them through two years of education with a
strong focus on engineering / software.
According to Infosys Co-founder Kris Gopalakrishnan “It is not that we are nowhere in
the product sweepstakes. Look at two Kerala companies, IBS and SunTec, the former a global
IT product brand in the transportation and logistics domain, and the latter a reputed name in the
billing and payments area.” He is also bullish about Infosys' own banking product, Finacle. “It is
one of the top three core banking solution products in Europe, and across developing countries
and Asia-Pacific, and we have crossed $200 million in billings for Finacle in 2009-10. That is
3% of our business turnover and the products prospects are very good”. There are also product
solutions that are licensed to clients. “There are ‘point solutions', for instance, that are a boon to
many retailers. Often, there are operators who have multiple products and multiple vendors and
they seldom have a comprehensive supply chain visibility. We see some of these clients
becoming big over time, benefiting both of us”. Gopalakrishnan knows only too well the difficult
path for IT products to turn successful in the global arena. “Finacle is 23 years old”, he says,
making it almost as old as Infosys itself.
21
5.2. HR related challenges:
No economy, and more so one looking at rapid growth in its services sector, can grow
beyond a point if its population is largely illiterate, or semi-literate. Yet, this seems precisely
what India is managing to do. Despite very high primary school enrollment ratios, the level of
functional literacy achieved is low because of very high drop-out rates, and. the poor standards
achieved in most primary schools. India's track record when it comes to higher education -
especially in science and technology - is even worse. So far, the way out has been to privatize the
already largely privatized education system. Thus, India's largest IT/ITES firms virtually run
their own universities - that is, places where graduates of Indian schools and universities
are once again trained to meet the requirements of their current jobs. However, such firm-
level-and even industry-level solutions are at best stop-gap measures. If a more permanent
solution is not found, it could well slow India's progress on the services front.
The government has now set its mind to increasing public spending on education. There
is also a greater willingness to allow the private sector an expanded role, especially when it
comes to technical education and for public-private partnerships. All of this will improve supply,
as also (one hopes) quality.
The following are the major reasons for the narrow base of the domestic IT-ITES market
in India as highlighted in a NASSCOM-IDC Study on the Domestic Services (IT-ITES) Market
Opportunity.
(i) Significant portion of domestic corporate IT spends lies in-house. In-house spending
on IT services accounts for more than half of corporate IT spend in India, while outsourced
22
spends account for 45%. In-housing IT spending includes training costs, salaries of in-house IT
staff and associated overheads
(ii) Majority of CIOs felt that domestic customers were not a focus area for IT service
providers. Also, CIOs felt that IT service providers hardly offer Indian customers the kind of
commitment and expertise that they offer their global customers. CIOs believe that potential of
domestic IT market is still not appreciated by many of domestic IT services providers
(iii) The level of awareness about the potential of using IT as an enabler of competitive
advantage has been poor. The cost arbitrage continues to be less attractive justification for
outsourcing in India. Hence, IT companies need to clearly articulate value proposition of their
services and relate it to business benefits
(iv) CIOs are under pressure to justify IT investment by demonstrating value (competitive
advantage) delivered from IT investments. Higher expectations from IT require CIOs to move
from routine IT operations to strategic IT management. This means that they need to spend most
of their time and effort in day-to-day operations of IT solution. Here, IT services providers are
expected to play a key role in helping CIOs in streamlining their IT operations
(v) Apart from banking, financial services and telecom new verticals (manufacturing,
tourism, healthcare) need to be developed to expand IT services market in India.
(vi) Larger and mature IT users increasingly prefer end-to-end IT services. This will be a
major growth engine for domestic IT market.
Currently, India’s software services are concentrated majorly in the USA & Canada
market (61.7%). The remaining is shared between Europe (23.5%), Asia (8.4%), Australia and
New Zealand (3.4%) and the rest (3%). Efforts at expanding UK and European markets have
intensified in the past few years to avoid risk. But this market is still dominated by the U.S and
East Europe. Continental Europe is reluctant to engage with India due to language hurdle. IT
majors are also targeting Southeast and East Asia for more business (see Box 4).
23
BOX 4: Japan ramping up its interest in India’s IT talent pool
Increasing protectionism in the U.S., combined with the trend of Western firms choosing to retain Indian
talent locally, means that global opportunities for Indian IT professionals are getting squeezed. But even
as the technology sun may be setting in the West, it could be rising in the East, with Japan ramping up its
interest in India’s talent pool.
Japan’s shrinking demographics are causing a rethink of the country’s notoriously immigrant‐averse
outlook. In 2016, only 9,80,000 babies were born in Japan, down from 2 million in 1975. The working
age population is predicted to decline from 77 million in 2015 to 67 million in 2030. Unsurprisingly, more
than half the companies surveyed recently by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, say they
have an interest in recruiting from overseas. To boost skilled immigration, Tokyo now allows foreign
professionals to get permanent residency in Japan after living in the country for one to three years.
Japan’s shortfall in talent in the IT sector is acute. The country already suffers a lacuna of 2,00,000 IT
engineers, which is expected to grow to 8,00,000 by 2030. India is a fertile hunting ground for new
talent. Yohei Shibasaki, CEO of Fourth Valley Concierge Corp, a headhunting firm based in Tokyo, says he
has begun recruiting from 30 Indian universities, including the IITs. “Japan realises that the best talent
is in India, but we cannot manage with English speakers,” he adds. As a result, only 20 of Japan’s top
firms recruit from India.
The numbers of Indians working in Japan are gradually increasing. About 8,000 of the 23,000‐strong
Indian diaspora here are IT professionals. But he admits that living as a foreigner in Japan continues to
be onerous from having to file tax returns in Japanese, to an inheritance tax that applies on global assets
even for people who have only worked in the country for a few years. Securing housing without a
guarantor, who is legally required to pay the rent if a tenant falls behind, is another obstacle.
Some of these challenges have eased. In particular, a few Indian schools have opened in Tokyo. Housing
with simpler rules for renting is also increasingly available, and areas with a preponderance of Indians,
like Nishikasai in eastern Tokyo, have emerged. But V. Sriram, a long‐term Japan resident who
established Infosys’s first Japan office in 1997, believes the crucial issue that constrains more
immigration from India is the difference in sensibility and work culture. In Japan, every task is
considered equally important, big or small, he says, whereas Indians prioritize certain outcomes over
others. There is little room in Japan for India’s famous improvisation. “The Japanese spend much more
time testing for unlikely, random exceptions than Indians are used to.”
Mr. Sriram thinks it works better for both Japanese firms and Indian professionals to collaborate in third
markets like the U.S. rather than in Japan itself. “The expectation remains that others have to change
to fit Japan rather than Japan changing to accommodate them.” Mr. Shibasaki however, remains
optimistic and points out that Japan’s foreign labour force is growing by about 20% every year. His
company has proposed the setting up of Japan Centres in select IITs to teach students Japanese and
familiarise them with cultural niceties connected to food and dress. For Indian IT job seekers, learning
to wield chopsticks and the correct way to bow could yield rich dividends.
24
5.5. Metro-centered IT development:
In India, the growth of IT-ITES sector has been centered majorly around urban areas. The
spread of IT development beyond urban areas has been slow. As a result, in the metros IT
industry has been spending substantial amounts on transportation, power, communication and
security. All these add up to the total industry cost. Money saved on these fronts can be deployed
for more constructive projects and infrastructure creation in Tier II and Tier III cities.
But, off late things are slowly changing: India’s BPO delivery footprint had grown
beyond a few metros. Even well established players have opened their business centres in small
towns (see Box 5 for the case of Zoho Corporation). The implication of this is the need to
increase delivery centres which means creation of both social and physical infrastructure in the
Tier II and III cities.
Box 5: India’s Small‐town Coders – The Case of Zoho Corporation
Mathalamparai in south Tamil Nadu is an unusual choice for a global software development
centre. Yet, it is not by chance that Sridhar Vembu (founder & CEO) chose the village near the temple
town of Tenkasi in Tamil Nadu to set up Zoho Corp’s eight acre campus. It was from here that the
company’s 200 member team developed and launched the lucrative and popular helpdesk software
Zoho Desk in 2016.
In the process, Zoho has provided a means of livelihood to rural youth, sparing them the
ordeal of migrating to large cities, leaving their families behind. “If you look at the smaller towns in
India, smart people just have to leave if they want to land good jobs,” says Vembu. Part of Vembu’s
critique of urbanisation is that it comes at crippling costs. He says “When you build gigantic cities, the
cost of infrastructure shoots up. And I don’t mean just absolute costs, but also per capita costs. And it’s
not just the cost of the building but also the cost of all the surrounding infrastructure.” “Never pay your
landlord exorbitantly, instead channel that [the money saved] into three meals a day for your
employees,” says Head of Engineering of the company.
25
Inside Zoho Corporation’s development centre at Tenkasi
This conviction is Zoho’s premise and its Tenkasi facility is an affirmation of the same. Many of
the employees there are from small towns in Tamil Nadu. Some even shifted base from Chennai so that
they could be closer to their families in nearby towns. This comes with perks for the employer too. At
Tenkasi centre, Zoho has zero attrition. The fact that employees can be close to their families is a big
draw that helps the company to retain local recruits. In Tenkasi town, two‐ and three‐bedroom flats are
available for a monthly rent of a few thousand rupees. Some employees even team up and share an
apartment, making it all the more cost effective. And the pleasant commute to work, with paddy fields,
hills and even waterfalls along the way, is an added perk.
The cost benefits are passed on to customers. The company does not nickel‐and‐dime them for
its software. The idea is to always pass on the benefits of cloud software to the end users. The company
also has Zoho University in the Tenkasi campus to train the young workforce.
Results in difficulty of securing right type and number of American visas. Hence,
handling political process in US will be important. However, Cognizant CEO Francisco D’Souza
says the recent protectionist measures by USA cannot be treated as rhetoric. He thinks there
are some real pressures in the US right now because of high unemployment rate (10%). To him,
the discussion needs to go back to what is the alternative question. Because the challenge we
have in the US is that while unemployment is at 10%, the IT unemployment is very low. The
reality is that US is not producing scientists and engineers at the rate that the industry
needs. So, it’s a real problem for US companies. To compete in the US companies in the world
is becoming more technology intensive. He thinks the recent restricting on granting H-IB visa to
Indian IT professionals was unfortunate because sufficient debate didn’t happen around the
broad implications of such a move when it comes to competitiveness of companies inside the
US. It’s in everyone’s interest for the economies of the world to recover, and the fastest way to
achieve this is by making the companies healthy. He thinks it’s very dangerous when you try to
hold back a key pool that companies need in order to be competitive: which is talent. Many
companies are responding to the backlash by announcing more local hiring in the US.
1. World Development Report (2004): Making services work for Poor People, World Bank.
3. Pallavi Aiyar (2017): Rise of the technology sun in the East, The Hindu, December 3
5. Sunil Mani (2014): Emergence of India as the World Leader in Computer and
Information Services, Economic and Political Weekly, December 6.
27
6. Sunil Jain and T.N. Ninan (2010): “Servicing India’s GDP Growth” in India’s Economy:
Performance and Challenges – Essays in Honour of Montek Singh Ahluwalia. Edited by
Shankar Acharya and Rakesh Mohan, Oxford University Press.
7. Deutsche Bank Research (2005): “Outsourcing to India: Crouching tiger set to pounce.”
October 25.
10. Rashmi Banga (2005): “Critical Issues in India’s Service-led Growth”, Working Paper
No.171, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
11. Seema Joshi (2004): “Tertiary Sector-Driven Growth in India: Impact on Employment
and Poverty”, Economic and Political Weekly, September 11.
16. James Gordon and Poonam Gupta (2004): “Understanding India’s Services Revolution”,
IMF Working Paper (No. WP/04/171).
17. Dipak Mazumdar, Sandip Sarkar (2007): “Growth of Employment and Earnings in
Tertiary Sector, 1983-2000,” Economic and Political Weekly, March 17.
18. Government of India (2008): “Report of the High Level Group on Services Sector”,
Planning Commission, New Delhi
19. “Key Highlights of the NASSCOM-IDC Study on the Domestic Services (IT-ITES)
Market Opportunity” (http://www.nasscom.in/upload/5216/Domestic%20Services.doc)
21. Rupa Chanda and Sasidaran G. (2007): “GATS and Developments in India’s Services
Sector”, in India’s Liberalisation Experience: Hostage to the WTO? Edited by Suparna
Karmakar, Rajiv Kumar and Bibek Debroy. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
28
Recommended Readings
Ejaz Ghani (2010): The Service Revolution in South Asia; Oxford University Press
S. Ramadorai (2011): “Towards Tomorrows India: The Future of Healthcare”, in The TCS
Story … and beyond; Penguin Books India.
Government of India (2008): “Report of the High Level Group on Services Sector”, Planning
Commission, New Delhi.
‘Now, salon owners are not just hairdressers, but entrepreneurs’, Interview with Groom India
MD, The Hindu, 6 Dec 2017.
Also see the readings uploaded in Virtual Classroom.
29
Scanned with CamScanner
Macro policy instrument:
Fiscal Policy
What is Fiscal Policy?
• Govt. decisions about the level of taxation and
public spending are called Fiscal Policy (FP).
AD = C + I + G + NX
SRAS
P1
E1
P2 E2
AD 1
AD 2
Y2 Y1 Output
• If nothing else happened, the economy would have
automatically corrected itself-eventually
• The wage rate would have had to fall along with other
prices.
SRAS
P3 E3
P2
E2
AD 1
AD 3
AD 2
Y2 Y3 Output
• What should govt. do when economy is growing too quickly?
SRAS SRAS
P2 P2
P3
P1 AD 2 AD 2
AD 3
AD 1
AD 1
Y1 Y2 Output
Y3 Y2 Output
• For those who are even more patient, the govt. offers its
longest-term option: Treasury bonds mature in 30 years and
pay a specified amount of interest every 6 months.
• Why would people want to hold government debt? The main reason lies in the
relative safety of investment (risk free), especially when compared with other
investments.
• When you invest in real estate, the housing market can crash. When you invest
in a company's stock, the company can lose market value or go bankrupt.
• Govts. rarely can declare themselves bankrupt, too, and refuse to pay back
money that people have loaned them.
• Investors generally believe that the odds of govt. defaulting payment are quite
low, essentially zero.
• In India, Banks prefer to buy T-Bill since it is eligible for inclusion in SLR.
Who issues T-Bills & Govt. Bonds in India?
• RBI by acting upon as the banker and issuing agent to
the GoI issues TBs & Govt. bonds
1
Expenditure spending multiplier =
(1 − b )
• A smaller b (MPC) results in smaller multiplier effect.
• A larger b results in larger multiplier effect.
Effect of tax cut
• The taxation multiplier is the amount that GDP
increases when taxes decrease by one rupee.
−b
Taxation multiplier =
(1 − b )
• The multiplier effect of tax cuts is smaller than the
effect of government spending.
Y = C + I + G I and G exogenous
= C
= MPC ( Y − T )
Solving for Y : (1 − MPC) Y = − MPC T
− MPC
Final result: Y = T
1 − MPC
Taxation multiplier effect
…is negatively related to GDP:
An increase in taxes reduces consumer spending, which
reduces equilibrium income.
1
Expenditure multiplier = = 2.5
(1 − 0.6 )
Rs. 100 million × 2.5 = Rs. 250 million added to GDP
−0.6
Taxation multiplier = = −1.5
(1 − 0.6)
–Rs. 100 million × –1.5 = Rs. 150 million added to GDP
Macroeconomic Policy Instrument:
Monetary Policy
Meaning of Monetary Policy (MP)
• MP/credit policy concerns with supply/controlling of
money (or) MP consists of actions by central bank to
manage money supply in pursuit of some
macroeconomic goals.
• Uncertainty
• Increase in inequalities
(2) High and stable employment:
Growth of M1
1975-76
1977-78
1979-80
1981-82
1983-84
1985-86
1987-88
1989-90
Growth of M1 Vs. Growth of WP Inflation
Growth of WP Inflation
1991-92
1993-94
1995-96
1997-98
1999-00
2001-02
0.0
5.0
-5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
-10.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0.0
5.0
1953-54
1955-56
1957-58
1959-60
1961-62
1963-64
1965-66
1967-68
1969-70
1971-72
1973-74
1975-76
1977-78
1991-92
1993-94
1995-96
Growth of WP Inflation
1997-98
1999-00
2001-02
0.0
5.0
-5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
-10.0
How MS Controlled Via MP?
• Responsibility is with the central bank (RBI).
$1 $10,000 $5,000
$1 $15,000 3
$2 $25,000 5
$8,000 $32,000 1
Active Learning - Solution
$1 $10,000 $5,000 2
$1 $45,000 $15,000 3
$2 $25,000 $10,000 5
$4 $8,000 $32,000 1
3. High-powered money (H) or Monetary base
• Also known as central bank money, base money
or reserve money
• Symbolically,
RE
RR = D
Where RE – Reserves held by banks
D - Deposits with banks
More the RR less will be MS
CU
CD =
D
RE
• mm is larger, the smaller the RR (= D )
A 10%
B 5%
C 5
Money Multiplier: Solution
A 10% 1 .10 = 10
B 5% 1 .05 = 20
C 1 5 = 20% 5
The role of the central bank
• A central bank is the institution ultimately
responsible for managing the nation's money
supply and coordinating the banking system to
ensure a sound economy.
CRR : 3%
SLR : 18%
Source: https://www.rbi.org.in/
Economic Effects of MP
Interest rate, r
Money supply
r*
Money
demand
Q*
Quantity of money
Note: Here we assume that money supply is completely fixed by the central bank.
(b) Determinant of supply of money
• It also means that the only way the supply of money can
change is when CB does so for policy reasons
MSc MS* MS e
rc
r*
re
MD
Qc Q* Qe
Quantity of money
• The slope of the money demand curve determines how
a change in the money supply will change the interest
rate.
MSc MS * MSe
MSc MS * MS e
r
c rc
r*
r MD
e
r*
re
Qc Q* Qe MD
Qc Q* Qe
Quantity of money Quantity of money
The more elastic money demand… The more inelastic money demand…
….smaller the effect on interest rates …greater effect on interest rates.
Impact of expansionary monetary policy
• Let's say that the economy is in a recession (or)
economy is in a short-run equilibrium marked by
sluggish output and lower prices
P2
r1 P1
r2 AD2
Money
demand
AD1
Q1 Q2 Y1 Y 2
Quantity of money Real GDP
• What would central bank (CB) do when the economy is
booming or overheating
P1
r2 P2
r1 AD 1
AD 2
MD
Q2 Q1 Y2 Y1
Quantity of money Real GDP
Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism
Consumer Investment
decisions
• Inflow and outflow of FDI doesn’t happen as fast as FII: (a) Firms
cannot just pick up a factory and move it across the border; (b)
Once made, FDI is difficult to take out.
(d) Central Bank Intervention:
• Selling of foreign currency in the forex. market
by central bank from its forex. reserves.
Comments:
(i) It is better for a country to control current
account deficit if it has (a) less assets to sell; (b)
low foreign currency reserves to use up; (c) less
number of lenders; and (d) low FDI & FII
inflows.
(ii) FDI (called cool money) is governed by long-term
considerations. Hence, is the most stable and reliable
source of finance. It is also non-debt creating.
I + NCF
Q*
Quantity of US $
• Suppose the domestic interest rate declines (in USA)
https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/02/china-
saving-marriage-markets-economy-
trade.html?sh=377e20047a83
https://www.facebook.com/TheEconomist/vi
deos/chinas-unbalanced-sex-
ratio/1081020442234958/
• A growing propensity to save decreases interest rate in
China relative to other markets thereby encouraging
encourage capital to flow abroad (USA) searching for
the best return.
(b) Interest rate: High interest rates in the USA relative to India
or overseas will increase the demand for US financial assets
thereby increasing the demand for $
• When the rate was allowed to float, the baht lost half
its value.
How China is able to undervalue its currency
without fear of speculative attack?
• As seen already, Chinese government keeps the yuan's
value low by selling piles of yuan in the foreign
exchange market, and it uses a portion of those dollars
to buy U.S. Treasury debt.
Demand for US goods in India (i.e. Demand for Indian goods in USA (i.e.
imports from USA) declines exports from India) increases – gain
in India’s external competitiveness