Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vibration Analysis of Cantilever Beam For Damage Detection: Marjan Djidrov
Vibration Analysis of Cantilever Beam For Damage Detection: Marjan Djidrov
1.000
Frequency ratio
0.990
l1'
3.2 Simulation procedure l2'
0.985
l3'
crack location and size. Determination of the natural 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
l1 '
lc3=0.86 m. 0.990
l2 '
The crack geometrical parameters are specified by 0.985
l3 '
using the following dimensionless crack parameters as:
0.980
l’ = lc / lb non dimensional crack position, h’ = hc / hb
non-dimensional crack depth. The non-dimensional 0.975
defined as a frequency ratio ω’= ωc / ω, where ωc is 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
1.000
4.1 Changes in Natural Frequencies
0.995
Frequency ratio
l1'
The variation of the frequency ratio as a function of the 0.990
l2'
crack depth and crack location for cantilever beam l3'
0.985
models are shown in Tables 1 to 3. The plots of the
variation of the first three natural frequency ratio, as a 0.980
Amplitude (m)
and cracked depth ratio compared with variation of the hc3
first two natural frequencies, but cracked depth ratio at 2e-7
location l2’ contributes to greater variation in terms of
other two positions. Numerical results shows that
cracked depth ratio located near the free end of the 1e-7
cantilever beam model is with almost negligible effect
on the frequencies changes, although changes in
frequencies is not only a function of crack depth, and 0
crack location, but also of the mode number [13]. Prior 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
the free end, FRF amplitude has slightly reduction form Frequency (Hz)
uncracked beam model (Fig. 6).
Figure 7. FRF for crack position lc2 for different crack depth
4e-7
at third natural frequency
No crack
hc1 4e-7 No crack
3e-7
hc2 hc1
Amplitude (m)
hc3 hc2
Amplitude (m)
3e-7
2e-7
hc3
2e-7
1e-7
1e-7
0
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Frequency (Hz) 0
38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Figure 5. FRF for crack position lc2 for different crack depth
at second natural frequency Frequency (Hz)
Figure 7 and 8, shows the FRFs for third mode of Figure 8. FRF for crack position lc3 for different crack depth
vibration for different crack depth hc1, hc2 and hc3 at at third natural frequency
different location lc2 and lc3, respectively. Figure 7,
shows natural frequencies shifts and FRF amplitude 5. CONCLUSION
reduction for crack position at lc2 in comparison with
uncracked beam model. At location lc3 near the free end, Vibration analysis of cantilever beam model have been
there is no difference in natural frequencies shifts and presented in this paper for damage detection. Damage
FRF amplitude reduction in consideration of different was introduced as single transversal crack at the surface,
crack depth hc1, hc2 and hc3 (Fig. 8). Despite this, there is and it’s assumed always to be open during analysis.
a changes by frequency and amplitude on FRF curve in Effect of different crack depth at different crack position