Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter One 1.1 Background of The Study
Chapter One 1.1 Background of The Study
Chapter One 1.1 Background of The Study
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
Given the impact of procurement activities on the operation and effectiveness of NGOs in
Kenya, it is essential that these activities be performed by qualified staff with high professional
and ethical standards and using sound procedures anchored in appropriate policies and
regulations. This study will investigate how aid effectiveness can be increased by improving the
efficiency of procurement processes in NGOs in Kenya, taking a case of the AMREF Kenya.
According to the United Nations, (2011), procurement is a key function of any organization,
public or private and in an era of globalization with the advent of entrepreneurial organizations,
management of purchasing and supply in private as well as public sector has gained prominence.
All procurement regardless of their value or complexity follow a standard sequence of actions,
which need to be effectively managed to realize the objectives of the procurement function
(Thai, 2011).Effective management of the function prevents the possibility of poor performance
and when attributed to non-adherence to proper procurement processes and procedures; is an
indicator of poor management of the procurement function (Tella& Savedoff, 2011).
An efficient and timely procurement procedure is a key element in reaching policy impact goals
in any sector managed by a public administration. In a market economy, competition is widely
viewed as a way to promote the most optimal balance between economy (frugality) and quality.
In a democracy, fair competition and access to markets are linked to human rights and good
governance.
However, the public’s desire for timely and efficient action by public administration on one
hand, and the principles of good governance (e.g. transparency, equal opportunities, fair
competition, rule of law, etc.) on the other, is often presented as key tensions in the public
procurement policy process. Such tensions and the necessity to, satisfy a wide spectrum of
stakeholders have made public procurement a fast evolving and continuously changing process,
and one that is being framed through a variety of policies. The importance of public
organizations as an entity designed to serve the public, along with the imperative for public
accountability, makes studying the problems associated with the public sector essential
(Tella&Savedoff, 2011).
Unlike in government organizations where there are clear rules and regulations on how goods
and services are purchased, many procurement activities in non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) suffer from neglect, lack of direction, poor co-ordination, lack of open competition and
transparency, and most importantly not having well established rules that are known to the
suppliers. In some NGOs, they lack adequate trained staffs that are competent to conduct and
manage such procurements in a professional, timely and cost effective manner. This has raised
questions of accountability from the public and various public institutions such as the National
Assembly in the recent past(Walsh, 2010). Given that procurement systems are central to the
effectiveness of development expenditure; where budgets get translated into services through
purchase of goods and services, it is important to find ways in which procurement processes can
be made more efficient, hence the need for research studies.
According to the AMREF’s (2007) report, three doctors namely Michael Wood, Archibald
McIndoeand Tom Rees founded AMREF in 1957 in Kenya. According to AMREF’s (2012)
annual report, African Medical & Research Foundation (AMREF) is Africa’s oldest and largest
international health development NGO. AMREF has 150 health projects in communities across
Africa (South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and West Africa) and is a
preferred partner for the World Health Organization (WHO) and national Ministries of Health.
The other AMREF national offices in the north mainly fundraise for the programme in Africa
and AMREF’s headquarter is situated at Langata road, near Wilson Airport in Nairobi. The
AMREF’s seven strategic directions as per AMREF’s 2012 annual reports are as follows:
Maternal Health, Child Health, Fighting Diseases, Water and Sanitation, Clinical and Diagnostic
Services, Research and Advocacy, One AMREF.
According to AMREF’s (2014) annual report, the AMREF Kenya Country Office is currently
implementing 48 projects with activities under five thematic areas: HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria
(7 projects); APHIA plus IMARISHA; Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (17 projects); Child and
Reproductive Health (16 projects); Clinical and Diagnostics Programme (4 projects); and
Research, Advocacy and Business Development (3 projects).
According to the 2018 board approved budget, the Kenya Country Program current funded
budget FY 2018/2019 is US$ is US$ 36.9 million across Kenya’s 47 Counties. The Kenya
Country Programme continues to closely monitor performance of every project by looking at the
monthly financial, programmatic and Quality of Service performance. Finance department,
which is a service department in AMREF Kenya, is the custodian of donor budgets and its key
roles include: Budget monitoring and tracking, timely reporting – both internal reporting for
management and external reporting to the donors, timely payment of suppliers and imprests,
provision of good customer care to internal and external staff.
Cavalcante (2013) states that there are instances where the level of technology in the NGO’s is
way ahead of the supplier technology estate and this creates supply chain engagement
bottlenecks. The challenges impeding the procurement efficiency and effectiveness in NGOs are
happening despite the deployment of technology and the automation of a large number of supply
chain systems (Wu, Blackhurst& Chidambaram, 2006).According to a Globe Scan poll of
experts, the leading role in achieving sustainability will be played by business (35%), followed
by NGOs (30%), and governments (24%) (Bell, 2003).
1.4Specific Objectives
The broad objective of the research was simplified into the following specific objectives:
i. To establish the effect of information technology adoption on the effectiveness of
procurement performance at AMREF Kenya.
ii. To determine the effect of staff awareness of procurement policies on effectiveness of
procurement performance at AMREF Kenya.
iii. To establish the effect of internal control systems on the effectiveness of procurement
performance at AMREF Kenya.
iv. To determine the sustainability of procurement practices on the effectiveness of
procurement performance at AMREF Kenya
1.5 Research questions
I) How to establish the effect of information technology adoption on the
effectiveness of procurement performance at AMREF Kenya?
II) How to determine the effect of staff awareness of procurement policies on
effectiveness of procurement performance at AMREF Kenya?
III) How to establish the effect of internal control systems on the effectiveness of
procurement performance at AMREF Kenya?
IV) How to determine the sustainability of procurement practices on the effectiveness
of procurement performance at AMREF Kenya?
1.6.2 Donors
The NGOs obtain their financial resources through donor funding. Since effective procurement
can make aid more effective to eradicate poverty and promote sustainable; this study will be of
importance to donors in formulating policies on how procurement of project material and other
resources should be effectively procured.
1.6.3 Public Sector Policy Makers
Policy makers may use the findings of this research as a guide to on how well they can formulate
polices such as providing good leadership of procurement for the organization, sourcing
management, ownership and accountability for sourcing processes, communication of purpose,
process and pay off, collaboration and partnering, and teamwork.
Monitoring: It is the process of supervising activities in progress to ensure they are on-course
and on-schedule in meeting the objectives and performance targets. Monitoring means regularly
collecting information on your project and analysing it to see how things are going. (Madina,
2010)
Performance: The accomplishment of a given task measured against pre-set known standards of
accuracy, completeness, cost, and speed. It is the objective of that process to provide an
integrated control system, where the corporate and functional strategies are deployed to all
business processes, activities, tasks and personnel, and feedback is obtained through the
performance measurement system to enable appropriate management decisions (Bailey et al,
2006).
Resource Allocation:it is a plan for using available resources, for example human resources,
especially in the near term, to achieve goals for the future. It is the process of allocating scarce
resources among the various projects or business units (Samwel, 2007)
Supply Chain: A supply chain is a system of organizations, people, activities, information, and
resources involved in moving a product or service from supplier to customer. Supply chain
activities transform natural resources, raw materials, and components into a finished product that
is delivered to the end customer Davis Sramek, B (2009).