MARKING RUBRIC

COURSEWORK TASK
PROGRAMME: PISMP SEMESTER/YEAR: 2/1
CODE AND COURSE: TSLB3213 Speech Communication

Task 1 : Round table Discussion :Formal Meeting - Group Task Presentation (10%)

CRITERIA
SCALE WEIGHTING
10%
 Excellent ability to carry out a discussion with a sound subject
knowledge(C6)
 Excellent ability to incorporate values in the discussion (A3)
High
Distinction 9.0 - 10  Excellent ability to communicate with participants of different cultures
(A +) (CS6)
(90-100%)  Excellent ability to effectively assume the role of both team leader and
team member (TS2)

 Good ability to carry out a discussion with a sound subject

knowledge(C6)
 Good ability to incorporate values in the discussion (A3)
Distinction 7.5 – 8.9  Good ability to communicate with participants of different cultures
(A, A-) (CS6)
(75-89%)  Good ability to effectively assume the role of both team leader and
team member (TS2)

 Fairly good ability to carry out a discussion with a sound subject

knowledge(C6)
 Fairly good ability to incorporate values in the discussion (A3)
Credit 6.0 – 7.4  Fairly good ability to communicate with participants of different
(B+, B, B-) cultures (CS6)
(60-74%)  Fairly good ability to effectively assume the role of both team leader
and team member (TS2)

 Minimal ability to carry out a discussion with a sound subject

knowledge(C6)
 Minimal ability to incorporate values in the discussion (A3)
Pass
5.0 – 5.9  Minimal ability to communicate with participants of different cultures
(C+, C) (CS6)
(50-59%)
 Minimal ability to effectively assume the role of both team leader and
team member (TS2)

 Poor/No ability to carry out a discussion with a sound subject

knowledge(C6)
Fail  Poor/No ability to incorporate values in the discussion (A3)
(C-, D+,
D,E & F)
0 – 4.9  Poor/No ability to communicate with participants of different cultures
(CS6)
(0-49%)  Poor/No to ability to effectively assume the role of both team leader
and team member (TS2)
MARKING RUBRIC

1
 COURSEWORK TASK
PROGRAMME: PISMP SEMESTER/YEAR: 2/1
CODE AND COURSE: TSLB3213 Speech Communication

Task 2a : Oral Presentation - Written Speech – Individual Task (15%)

SCALE WEIGHTING CRITERIA

15%
 Excellent ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations
High and logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
Distinction
13.5 – 15.0  Excellent ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
(A+)  Very willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s
(90-100%)
mind.(LL3)

 Good ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations and

Distinction logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
(A, A-) 11.3 – 13.4  Good ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
(75-89%)  Willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.
(LL3)

 Fairly good ability to present an insightful, lucid

interpreatations and logical progression of ideas in the speech
Credit (C6)
(B+, B, B-)
(60-74%)
9.0- 11.2  Fairly good ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
 Fairly willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s
mind.(LL3)

 Minimal ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations

Pass and logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
(C+, C)
(50-59%) 7.5 - 8.9
 Minimal ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
 Minimal effort to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s
mind.(LL3)

 Poor/No ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations

Fail and logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
(C-, D+, D, E
& F) 0- 7.4
 Poor/No ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
(0-49%)  Not willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.
(LL3)

MARKING RUBRIC

2
 COURSEWORK TASK
PROGRAMME: PISMP SEMESTER/YEAR: 2/1
CODE AND COURSE: TSLB3213 Speech Communication

Task 2b : Oral Presentation - Presentation with Props-Individual Task (15%)

CRITERIA
SCALE WEIGHTING
15%
 Excellent ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations and
logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
High  Excellent ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
Distinction 13.5 – 15.0  Excellent ability to deliver presentations clearly and confidently at a
(A +) level appropriate to the audience (CS3)
(90-100%)
 Very willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.(LL3)

 Good ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations and logical

progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
 Good ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
Distinction 11.3 – 13.4  Good ability to deliver presentations clearly and confidently at a level
(A, A-) appropriate to the audience (CS3)
(75-89%)
 Willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.(LL3)

 Fairly good ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations and

logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
 Fairly good ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
Credit 9.0- 11.2  Fairly good ability to deliver presentations clearly and confidently at a
(B+, B, B-) level appropriate to the audience (CS3)
(60-74%)
 Fairly willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.(LL3)

 Minimal ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations and

logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
 Minimal ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
Pass
7.5 - 8.9  Minimal ability to deliver presentations clearly and confidently at a
(C+, C) level appropriate to the audience (CS3)
(50-59%)
 Minimal effort to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.
(LL3)

 Poor/No ability to present an insightful, lucid interpreatations and

logical progression of ideas in the speech (C6)
Fail
 Poor/No ability to respond to constructive feedback.(A2)
(C-, D+, D,
E & F)
0- 7.4  Poor/No ability to deliver presentations clearly and confidently at a
level appropriate to the audience (CS3)
(0-49%)  Not willing to seek out more knowledge to expand one’s mind.(LL3).

MARKING RUBRIC

3
 COURSEWORK TASK
PROGRAMME: PISMP SEMESTER/YEAR: 2/1
CODE AND COURSE: TSLB3213 Speech Communication

Task 3 : Project – A video recording of a persuasive speech – Pair Work (20%)

SCALE WEIGHTING CRITERIA

20%
 Excellent ability to produce a video which is clear and
interesting with convincing content (C6)
High
Distinction
 Excellent ability to make effective use of technology in
18.0-20.0 presentations (CS4)
(A +)
( 90-100%)  Excellent ability to contribute towards the planning and
coordination of group effort (TS4)

 Good ability to produce a video which is clear and

interesting with convincing content (C6)
Distinction
 Good ability to make effective use of technology in
15.0-17.9 presentations (CS4)
(A, A-)
(75-89% )  Good ability to contribute towards the planning and
coordination of group effort (TS4)

 Fairly good ability to produce a video which is clear and

interesting with convincing content (C6)
Credit
 Farily good ability to make effective use of technology in
15.0-18.9 presentations (CS4)
(B+, B, B-)
(60-74%)  Fairly good ability to contribute towards the planning and
coordination of group effort (TS4)

 Minimal ability to produce a video which is clear and

interesting with convincing content (C6)
 Minimal ability to make effective use of technology in
Pass 10.0-14.9 presentations (CS4)
(C+, C)
 Minimal ability to contribute towards the planning and
(50-59%)
coordination of group effort (TS4)

 Poor/No ability to produce a video which is clear and

interesting with convincing content (C6)
Fail  Poor/No ability to make effective use of technology in
(C-, D+, D, 0-9.9 presentations (CS4)
E & F)
 Poor/No ability to contribute towards the planning and
(0-49%)
coordination of group effort (TS4)