Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CTDI and DLP Notes
CTDI and DLP Notes
Slide 1
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
CTDI
and
DLP
With this presentation we want to explain the value of CTDI and DLP,
indicating their relation and more over their differences.
Slide 2
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
As a basis for this presentation we used and sometimes quote the through the
CICIR published document Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography
written by Dr Hans Dieter Nagel.
Slide 3
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
CTDI
Computer Tomography Dose Index
DLP
Dose Length Product
CTDI stands for Computer Tomography Dose Index and indicates the
exposed dose at standardized or normalized scanconditions. DLP stands for
Dose Length Product and indicates the total to the patient exposed dose at
real clinical conditions, whereby a for the diagnosis relevant image quality is
obtained.
Slide 4
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Slide 5
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Measurement of dose:
Remove phantom from system
Remove measurement device
from phantom
Read out dose in device
After the scans the dose sensitive device is read out and used as a basis for
the DLP calculations
Slide 6
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Page 8
Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography
Edited by Hans Dieter Nagel
The absolute value of the measured CTDI gives an indication of the quantity
of X-ray photons generated at a normalized scan condition and because of its
normalized character represents an index and not a dose figure for the
particular scanner.
Slide 7
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Slide 8
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
How How
to calculate DLP for Inner Ear?
is DLP measured?
Collect
DLPconditions
is not of acquisition: it is calculated
measured,
Tube/filter output
Used kV from ExamPlan
Used mAs from ExamPlan
Number of rotations from ExamPlan
Number of slices/rotation from ExamPlan
Slice thickness (cm) from ExamPlan
The Dose Length Product is calculated from the real applied conditions in the
clinical environment and uses the CTDI value as the basis for the tube output.
This CTDI is multiplied with all factor that are calculated from the difference
between the normalized and the clinical applied parameters.
Slide 9
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Tube/filter output
For our CTDI value we used the program developed by Dr Nagel and Dr
Stamm Which were checked against our own values as well as against the
values measured on a standard Siemens Volume Zoom. In both cases the
values did not differ more that 10%.
For the comparison of the DLP value we used the Marconi Mx8000 and the
Aquilion Multi, since they differ in CTDI the most, whereby because of the
CTDI value, the Mx8000 is perceived as a low dose machine.
Slide 10
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
This table shows the difference in acquisition parameters between the inner
ear protocol for the Mx8000 and the Aquilion Multi. The protocols are retrieved
from those used at the Indiana university and Charite university and can be
found on the Internet
Slide 11
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Formula:
(Used kV / Reference kV)²
Page 19
Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography
Edited by Hans Dieter Nagel
Here we calculate the conversion factor for the clinically applied High Voltage.
Slide 12
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Formula:
Used mAs/Reference mAs
Page 19
Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography
Edited by Hans Dieter Nagel
Slide 13
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Calculation 16 x 2 5,715 x 4
The pitch and the number of rotations per cm are established through the
Pitch factor and the number of slices per rotation
Slide 14
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Calculate DLP
DLP = CTDI . Kc . Ac . n . h
Page 19
Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography
Edited by Hans Dieter Nagel
Kc Correction factor kV
Ac Correction factor mAs
n Number slices
h Slice thickness (cm)
Multiplication of all these factors with the CTDI gives us the DLP value
Slide 15
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Calculate DLP
DLP = CTDI . Kc . Ac . n . h
Here again the CTDI and the individual conversion factors for both systems
Slide 16
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
DLP = CTDI . Kc . Ac . n . h
Marconi
191,67 mGy (29,86 x 1,36 x 2,95 x 32 x 0,05)
Toshiba
23,35 mGy (40,87 x 1,00 x 0,50 x 22,86 x 0,05)
Slide 17
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Comparisons
When we compare all available scan protocol used in the Mx8000 with those
used in the Aquilion Multi almost everywhere a higher DLP is administrated to
the patient than with the Aquilion despite the lower CTDI in the Mx8000.
Slide 18
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Comparisons
In this table we show the discrepancy between CTDI and DLP applied for the
Lightspeed QXi and the Aquilion Multi. Here also, the scanprotocols are
retrieved from the internet, in this case from the official GE web site.
Slide 19
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Comparisons
Comparing the Siemens Volume Zoom with with the Aquilion Multi we see that
a CTDI values are much closer to each other, but still the administrated DLP
is higher. Also in this case the scan protocols were retrieved from the internet
and quoted in the official Siemens web site as well as CTisus of Elliot
Fishman of the John Hopkins University.
Slide 20
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Conclusion
Therefore we see that CTDI does not say anything about dose administered
to a patient and
Slide 21
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Conclusion
Slide 22
Medical Systems / Japan HQ 2002
Be Aware of Dose
it is
B.A.D.