Week 5 - Voidable Marriages, Procedure in actions for annulment – March 9

1. Void v. voidable Ninal v Bayadog, G.R. No. 133778. March 14,

marriages, FC 4 cf. 2000
45

2. Grounds for Moe v. Dinkins, 533 F.Supp. 623 (1981), 669

annulment F.2d 67 (1982)

(a) Absence of
parental consent,
FC 4, 5, 14, 45(1),
47(1), 35 (1), cf R.A.
6809, FC 234, 236

(b) Insanity, FC Katipunan v Tenorio, 38 OG 172, 1937

45(2), 47(2), NCC
Art. 1149

(c) Fraud Anaya v. Palaroan 36 SCRA 97

FC 45(3), 46, 47(3) Hernandez vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
NCC 1338-1344 126010.  December 8, 1999
Rep. Act No. 10354, Buccat v. Buccat 72 Phil 49
The Responsible Aquino v. Delizo 108 Phil 21
Parenthood and Almelor vs. RTC, G.R. No. 179620, August 26,
2008
Reproductive Health
Act of 2012

Rep. Act No. 1116,

Philippine HIV and
AIDS Policy Act

(d) Force, Ruiz v Atienza, 40 O.G. 1903 (1941)

intimidation and Villanueva v CA, 505 SCRA 564
undue influence
FC 45(4), 47(4)
NCC 1335-1337
(e) Physical Jimenez v. Cañizares 109 Phil 273
incapacity/impotence Sarao v Guevara, 1940, 40 OG 11 Supp 263
FC 45(5), 47(5) Alcazar vs Alcazar, GR 174451, October 13,
2009

(f) Affliction with Republic v Albios, G.R. No. 198780, October

STD, FC (45(6), 16, 2013
compare with FC
46(3), 47(5), 47 (3)

(g) Others

3. Who can seek Barcelona vs. CA, G. R. 130087, Sept. 24, 2003
annulment, FC 47,
Sec. 3, AM No. 02-
11-10-SC, March 4,
2003

4. When to seek
annulment. FC 47,
NCC 1149

5. Procedure in
actions for
annulment

FC Art. 48, A.M.

No. 02-11-10-SC.
March 4, 2003

6. Effects of
pendency of action
for annulment

FC 49, 198, 213

A.M No. 02-11-12-
SC. March 4, 2003

7. Effects of Chan-Tan v Chan, G.R. No. 167139, February

annulment, FC 50- 25, 2010
54, 43, 44, 86 (3),
99, 102, 129

(a) In general

(b) On remarriage,
FC Art. 40

(c) On rights &

obligations between
the former spouses,
68, 98
(d) On the property
regime of the
marriage
FC 50, FC 43(2) cf.
FC 102(4), 129, 138,
106
(e) On ‘presumptive Yu v Reyes-Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011
legitimes/hereditary
rights
FC 50, 43, FC 51 in
rel to NCC 886, 888;
NCC 908, 1061
FC 102 (5) and (6),
129 (8) and (9)

(f) On the status Mendez vs. Shari’a District Court, G.R. No.
and custody of 201614, January 12, 2016
children, FC 54, 213

(g) On use of Yasin vs Shari'a, G.R. No.94986 February 23,

surnames, NCC Art. 1995
371, 364, 369 B.M. NO. 1625 -Josephine P. Uy-Timosa
Remo v DFA, March 2010
Marriage when one SSS vs. De Bailon, G.R. No. 165545, March 24,
spouse is absent 2006
FC 41-44 compare
with NCC 83, 85(2)
and 87(2)
cf. RPC 349

Forfeiture and
Delivery of
Presumptive
Legitimes