The Sound of Silence: Designing and Producing Silent Transformers

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Simple and friendly

The sound
of silence
Designing and producing silent transformers
Ramsis Girgis, Jan Anger, Donald Chu

Silence is a source of great strength. Although these words were first coined by the an-
cient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu, they could equally well apply to modern power trans-
formers. As important as these devices are in assuring our power supply, it is important
not to ignore the negative sides of their operation. One of the major issues here is that
they produce annoying noise.

Probably the strictest noise ordinance in the world is enforced in New York City. To be
able to supply transformers for installation here, ABB had to meet extremely demanding
requirements. Through the company’s deep and detailed understanding of transformer
vibrations and noise, it was able to fulfill these demands and is now well poised to supply
low and ultra low noise transformers to other major cities, around the world.

ABB Review 2/2008 47


The sound of silence

Simple and friendly

T oday, the world is show-


ing increasing concern
over environmental matters,
1 Noise level contours around a small substation with two 40 MVA

transformers. Where such noise exceeds certain levels, it can be of


decibels (dB), where, a deci-
bel is defined as 10 × Log10
(sound pressure). Sound
great discomfort to humans.
and the minimization of levels are typically presented
noise in the vicinity of resi- T -180 and specified in A-weighted
dential areas is one aspect N decibels; dB(A), where the
that is growing in impor- PLOTTED:
sound levels are attenuated
BAND:
tance. Transformers exhibit Octave according to their frequencies
Total
vibrations while operating, SPL dB (A)
per an “A-filter,” which de-
and generate a characteristic picts the frequency response
50
hum classified as “noise” 1 . of the human ear 3 .
45
This noise is characterized
40
by mainly four pure tones, 35
There are at present industry
the frequencies of which are 30 standards (IEEE and IEC) that
in the range of human 25 specify how transformer noise
speech 2 . The noise, being 20 is to be measured. However,
of a marked tonal character, some customers require re-
causes irritation and discom- porting of the total collective
fort. It is hence important to noise level of the transformer
assure that residential areas are not ferred to in this article as the “silent in dB(A), whereas others require re-
disturbed. This work is of especial im- transformers,” to the ConEd company porting of individual frequency com-
portance in urban areas where houses in Manhattan, NY, where the noise ponents. Some customers require
are built very close to power-transmis- ordinance is the toughest in the world. measurement of only the core and fan
sion and distribution-size transformers. This is discussed in more detail later in noise, and some require measurement
this article. of the total noise level of the trans-
In many countries, local and national former, including load noise.
governments have stipulated maxi- Noise level and frequency spectrum
mum permissible noise levels. These Sound produces minute oscillatory Transformer noise
permissible levels vary in value from changes in air pressure and is audible There are three sources of sound/
normal levels in rural areas, to lower to the human ear when its level is noise in power transformers:
values near large metropolitan cities, above a certain threshold and the fre- Core noise, caused by magnetostric-
and to ultra-low values in some parts quency of the pressure oscillations is tion effects
of New York City. in the 20 Hz to 20 kHz range. Sound Load noise, caused by electromag-
level limitations are typically deter- netic forces in the windings and
In order to fulfill these noise restric- mined by the human perception of structural parts due to leakage flux
tions, it is necessary to understand the sound, which is both logarithmic and associated with the current
total process of sound generation, trans- frequency dependent. For example, Noise generated by the operation of
mission and radiation. Such knowledge the human ear is ten times less sensi- the cooling equipment, fans and
has enabled ABB to successfully design tive to sound at 100 Hz than it is to pumps
and build quiet transformers for cus- sound at 1,000 Hz, and each doubling
tomers in different parts of the world. of the absolute sound pressure is felt Core noise, caused by magnetostriction
Most recently, ABB delivered a number as a small addition on the sound Magnetostriction is a term used for
of ultra-low-noise transformers, re- level. Sound is therefore measured in the small mechanical deformations of

2 Typical frequency spectrum of noise produced by a 60 Hz power 3 Frequency response of the A–weighting filter to sounds of different
transformer frequencies

80
0
70
sound pressure, dB(A)

-10
Attenuation, dB

60
-20

50
-30

40
-40

30
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 10 20 40 100 200 400 1k 2k 4k 10k 20k
Frequency / Hz Frequency / Hz

48 ABB Review 2/2008


The sound of silence

Simple and friendly

core laminations in response to the Sound generated by cooling equipment The TrafoStar tank is designed to
application of a magnetic field. The The frequency character of fan noise is avoid any unnecessary noise increase
change in dimension is independent different from the sound from the core through its high radiation efficiency
of the direction of the flux and hence and windings. It does not have discrete or tank resonance. Acoustic simula-
it occurs at double the supply fre- tones but covers a broad frequency tions, verified by scale models and
quency. However, because the mag- band with a peak at the “blade pas- full-size experiments, have provided
netostriction curve is non-linear, high- sage” frequency, which is the frequen- the tools needed to avoid tank reso-
er frequency harmonics of even cy at which the fan impeller blades nances and reduce sound radiation 7 .
orders are introduced at higher flux pass some rigid disturbance in the air
densities 4 . Therefore, core noise has flow – and sometimes at twice that fre- Lower-noise transformers
components at multiples of 100 or quency. Pumps also produce noise of
120 Hz (for 50 Hz and 60 Hz trans- a broad band nature and contribute to Lower core noise
formers, respectively). The relative the total noise of the transformer. In addition to seeking low magneto-
magnitudes of the noise at these dif- striction, using steel with higher
ferent frequency components is de- Design features grades of magnetic orientation for the
pendant on core material, core geom- Power transformers of ABB’s present
etry, operating flux density, and how design generation, designated as
4 Example magnetostriction curve; relative
close the resonance frequencies of TrafoStar, typically have noise levels
change of core steel lamination length
core and tank are to the exciting fre- that are significantly lower than those
during a complete cycle of alternating flux
quencies. built 20 or 30 years ago. Some of the
more important contributors to achiev- 2
Load noise caused by electromagnetic ing these low levels of transformer
forces noise are: 1

Load noise is mainly generated by the Designing transformer cores to pro- 0


-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
interaction of the load current in the vide a more uniform distribution of
windings and the leakage flux pro- magnetic flux with a lower content -1

duced by this current. The main fre- of flux harmonics globally in the 2
quency of this sound is, therefore, core and locally in the core joints. Flux density (T)
twice the supply frequency; 100 Hz for Detailed 2-D and 3-D magnetic field
50 Hz transformers and 120 Hz for modeling have been used to opti-
60 Hz transformers. If the load current mize core designs to minimize core
5 Magnetic flux distribution
contains significant harmonics, eg, in noise 5 .
in a three-phase core
rectifier transformers, the forces will The core is held together by a
contain higher frequency harmonics. clamping structure that provides
These additional harmonics are a sig- uniform pressure on the core lami-
nificant source of noise that must be nations while local deformations
considered when the transformer is are avoided. ABB is using in-house
ordered. The load current noise level developed tools to calculate the
is strongly dependent on the trans- vibrations of the core considering
former load. Reducing the current by different modes of vibrations and
50 percent provides a reduction of the mechanical resonance as well as
load current noise by 12 dB. the complex forces exciting a three-
phase transformer core 6 .

6 3-D modeling of mechanical vibrations of a three-phase core 7 3-D modeling of sound radiation from the tank of a three-phase
transformer

ABB Review 2/2008 49


The sound of silence

Simple and friendly

core and reducing the flux density in Lower cooling–system noise These levels correspond to a total
the core, noise from the core can be Noise from cooling fans can be re- noise level of about 59 dB(A) at maxi-
reduced by a number of other mea- duced by selecting low-speed fans or mum overexcitation and full current.
sures that have been developed over fans with sound-absorbing elements The corresponding value for the total
the years. These include: at the inlet and outlet. Other means dB(A) at 100 percent voltage and full
De-coupling of core vibrations from include special fan or blade designs current is in the 54 dB(A) range. In
the transformer tank. In order to get with improved noise performance. comparison, transformers of this size
good results from this, it is neces- In many cases, in which very strict would typically have noise levels in
sary to consider carefully the dy- noise requirements apply, fan noise the 70 dB(A) range for no-load noise
namic properties of the transformer is eliminated by designing the trans- alone. Low-noise transformers will
core and of the transformer tank. former with more radiators instead have 10 dB less (again, no-load value
The vibration isolation elements of fans. When cooling pumps are alone). This demonstrates the extent
need to be properly designed. required, pumps with low noise emis- of the ConEd noise requirements rela-
Avoiding both tank and core reso- sion are adopted. tive to typical or even low-noise trans-
nances. This necessitates accurately formers.
pre-determining values of the differ- ConEd transformer requirements
ent core and tank resonance fre- In order to satisfy the harsh limits that But these were not the only challeng-
quencies 8 . the NYC Noise Ordinance has im- es. The ConEd requirements impose
Damping treatment of the tank. posed on all sources of noise in the other design restrictions. These are:
Using sound panels or enclosures city, ConEd’s electric equipment de- Tight limits on weight, width, and
covering parts of or the entire tank partment has revised its noise specifi- height to permit transportation in
(for transformers that must fulfill cations for new power transformers. Manhattan
especially low levels of noise). These specifications ensure ultra- Tight limits on transformer imped-
A number of new techniques that low-noise transformers in the ConEd ance variation across the range of
attempt to reduce the transmissibili- power system. These specifications the tap changer
ty of the core vibrations and hence have the following very stringent Significant overload requirements
the resulting sound radiation. requirements: (up to 200 percent)
1) 15 to 20 dB lower than typical for Limits on temperatures of hot-spots
Lower load noise these sizes of transformers in the windings at different loads
Winding type, winding arrangement, 2) Guarantee noise levels are not
current density, tank shielding / shunts, exceeded at: The designs requested by ConEd were
and tank design parameters have a a) 100 percent voltage combined for their standardized 65 MVA and
significant effect on the magnitude of with 100 percent load 93 MVA network transformers.
load noise. Extensive development b) Maximum over-excitation
work has resulted in the following combined with 40 percent Solutions for the ConEd transformer
measures for load-noise reduction: load Designing a transformer for such ultra-
Using winding designs that generi- 3) Limits govern not only total noise
cally provide for lower magnitudes levels but also each individual
Factbox Maximum allowable limits for the three
of leakage flux density frequency component
most important frequencies
Avoiding winding resonance
Improved tank shielding against The maximum allowable limits of the
Octave band
leakage flux frequency spectrum of the total noise
center 125 250 500
Damping treatment of the tank of the transformer (sum of no-load
frequency (Hz)
Improved tank design having lower and load noise) for the three most
sound radiation properties important frequency components of Permissible
71 64 57
Sound enclosures covering the the transformer noise are shown level (dB)
entire tank below Factbox .

8 Modeling of mechanical resonance of a five-limb, three-phase core 9 Ultra-low noise ConEd transformer with Sound Enclosure

50 ABB Review 2/2008


The sound of silence

Simple and friendly

10 Ultra-low noise ConEd transformer with Sound Panels 11 Ultra-low noise ConEd transformer with no Sound Enclosure or Panels

low noise levels while at the same time For the next few years, the ABB tech- tween 2 and 5 dB lower than the ultra-
satisfying all the other limitations is nology development team worked low levels specified by ConEd.
only possible if the transformer manu- very hard on all of the seven noise-
facturer is capable of the following: related technology areas discussed in As a result of this success, ConEd
Accurate calculation of the noise this article. As a result of the progress awarded more of these 93 and 65 MVA
level of the core versus its flux den- achieved, ConEd awarded ABB the transformers for delivery in 2008 and
sity contract to produce the first ultra-low- early 2009. These transformers were
Accurate calculation of load noise noise 93 MVA transformers. These again designed using the latest tech-
Accurate calculation of resonance transformers were designed using the nology developed at ABB. It was
frequencies for the core, windings, technology available at that point in therefore possible to upgrade the
tank plates and tank stiffeners time and it was successfully tested design of these transformers with
Accurate calculation of frequency and delivered in 2005. The first of significantly less weight of core and
spectrum of core noise versus flux these was equipped with a sound windings while still satisfying the
density enclosure 9 . The second and third ConEd requirements.
Effective means of reducing both transformers had only sound panels
core and load noise for the different attached to the tank walls 10 . The ultra-low-noise transformer tech-
frequencies nology resulting from this develop-
Proper transformer mounting tech- ment is now being used in producing
niques
The more accurately optimum designs for low-noise trans-
Accurate indoor measuring tech- calculations can be formers for other customers in metro-
niques of low noise levels in the performed, the lower the politan areas around the world.
factory
margin of the resulting
The more accurately calculations can design and the more fea-
be performed, the lower the margin
of the resulting design and the more
sible it becomes to satisfy
feasible it becomes to satisfy tough tough specifications.
specifications.
After the delivery of these transform- Ramsis Girgis
A success story ers, ConEd awarded ABB an order for ABB Inc.
As of the spring of 2003, ABB had the ultra-low-noise 65 MVA transformers. St. Louis, MO, USA
technology to design low-noise trans- These transformers were designed ramsis.girgis@us.abb.com
formers but not to the levels or the using the latest noise technology that
details required by the revised specifi- was available at the time (2005). The Jan Anger
cations for the ConEd ultra-low-noise transformers were produced with no ABB Inc.
transformers. Recognizing this fact, external sound enclosure or panels 11 . Ludvika, Sweden
ABB identified the research and devel- In fact, the second unit was designed jan.anger@se.abb.com
opment work that needed to be done with significantly less winding weight
to advance the technology existing at while testing 4 dB lower load noise Donald Chu
the time to the level of rigor necessary than the first unit. Frequency compo- ConEd
to successfully design and build the nents of the total of core and load New York, NY, USA
transformers required by ConEd. noise of this transformer were be- chud@coned.com

ABB Review 2/2008 51

You might also like