1 of 45

Perfect Equations

By

Ian Beardsley

Copyright © 2021 by Ian Beardsley


 2 of 45

Table of Contents

Abstract……………………..3

Introduction…………………4

Detour……………………….11

Returning From Detour……..14

Another Scheme…………….21

The Protoplanetary Disc…….22

Binary Digital Logic………..26

Weird Arithmetic……………29

The Geometry……………….38
 3 of 45

Abstract

In this last part of this paper I suggest that the purpose of stars is
to produce not just biological elements, but artificial intelligence
(AI) elements. Because if we include AI elements in the life ele-
ments we have a mathematical pattern in the periodic table of the
elements that determines an equation that predicts the equations
of nucleosynthesis in the stars.

In the first part of this paper I explore ratios and proportions that
I have found in different aspects of Nature, between the planets,
the human body, and molar masses of biological elements and
compounds, and artificial intelligence semiconducting elements.
It is okay to suggest there is a connection between these vastly
different systems because it should be no surprise that the forces
operating are the same. We are all familiar with the golden ratio,
and it owes its effectiveness to its irrationality, it is described by
the square root of five. But there are other dynamic ratios that
cannot be written in closed form either; square root of two,
square root of three, and of course unity or one.

In in middle part of this paper I go over how I arrived at the

equations of the first part.

 4 of 45

Introduction
If I consider my two books, Weird Arithmetic and Weird Calcu-
lus, and The Mathematical Nature of Life, certain equations that I
formed in them, while all of them are interesting, they stand out.
In the first book I looked at the connection of artificial intelli-
gence to the planets. Out of all the equations for the planets,
Venus was the most dynamic in form, and the most accurate
(Better than 99%). This equation was:

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge
= 0.72
Ge2 1+
Si2
Ge 2

Where Si is silicon and Ge is germanium, the two principle

semiconductor elements used to make diodes and transistors, and
are at the heart of artificial intelligence (AI) circuitry. The 0.72 is
the amount of astronomical units in the Venus average orbital
distance from the Sun, where an astronomical unit (AU) is the
average earth-sun separation. We can see the validity of this
equation as follows:

28.08553
1 2(28.0855)(72.64) + 72.64
= 0.722995806
72.642 1+
28.08552
72.64 2

Where Si and Ge are in in molar mass (grams/mole).

The other equation that was the most interesting in the second
book was for the relationship between the primary doping agents
used to dope silicon and germanium so it can semiconduct.

The primary elements of artificial intelligence (AI) used to make

diodes and transistors, silicon (Si) and germanium (Ge) doped
with boron (B) and phosphorus (P) or gallium (Ga) and arsenic
 5 of 45

(As) have an asymmetry due to boron. Silicon and germanium

are in group 14 like carbon (C) and as such have 4 valence elec-
trons. Thus to have positive type silicon and germanium, they
need doping agents from group 13 (three valence electrons) like
boron and gallium, and to have negative type silicon and germa-
nium they need doping agents from group 15 like phosphorus
and arsenic. But where gallium and arsenic are in the same peri-
od as germanium, boron is in a different period than silicon (pe-
riod 2) while phosphorus is not (period 3). Thus aluminum (Al)
is in boron’s place. This results in an interesting equation.

Si(As − Ga) + Ge(P − Al ) 2B

=
SiGe Ge + Si
The differential across germanium crossed with silicon plus the
differential across silicon crossed with germanium normalized by
the product between silicon and germanium is equal to the boron
divided by the average between the germanium and the silicon.
The equation has nearly 100% accuracy:

28.09(74.92 − 69.72) + 72.64(30.97 − 26.98) 2(10.81)

=
(28.09)(72.64) (72.64 + 28.09)

0.213629041 = 0.214633178
0.213629041
100 = 0.995
0.214633178
This can be written:

Si Ge 2SiGe
(As − Ga) + (P − Al ) =
B B Si + Ge
Which is very interesting for two reasons; the term on the right is
the harmonic mean between silicon and germanium and on the
left side of the equation As and Ga are to the immediate right and
immediate left of germanium but are here multiplied by silicon,
while P and Al are immediately to the right and left of silicon
 6 of 45

but are here multiplied by germanium. The equation is dynamic

because Al is used as a dummy in the differential, because it is in
borons place resulting in the harmonic mean on the right.

The third equation of interest is in the second book listed above

which works on the connection of biological life to AI. One of
the central subjects to study when trying theorize the origin of
life, is that of amino acids, the building blocks of life, and how
they could have come into existence.

I processed the 20 genetically encoded amino acids according to

the following scheme:

aminogroup
(RGroup)
acidgroup
In hopes of finding a connection between artificial intelligence
and the biological. The result was that two of the amino acids
were equal to elements in the periodic table of the elements and
they were perfectly carbon (C) the core element of biological
life, and silicon (Si) the core element of of artificial intelligence.
The amino acids are the building blocks of life, synthesized into
proteins by DNA. The two amino acids were serine and gluta-
mine as follows,…

H3 N
(CH2 + OH ) = C
COO
H3 N
(2CH2 + CO + NH2) = Si
COO

H3 N 5−1
= (1 − ϕ) ϕ=
COO 2
Si
(1 − ϕ) =
Ge
 7 of 45

Si
(CH2 + OH ) = C
Ge
C
(CH2 + OH ) = Ge
Si
Si
(2CH2 + CO + NH2) = Si
Ge
(2CH2 + CO + NH2) = Ge
Ge is the other core semiconductor element.

(CH2 + OH ) C
=
(2CH2 + CO + NH2) Si
(CH2 + OH )
C= Si
(2CH2 + CO + NH2)
These equations are nearly 100% accurate. ϕ (phi) is the golden
ratio conjugate. ϕ = 1/Φ where Φ (uppercase phi) is the gold-
en ratio. Also Φ = ϕ + 1. As you can see, it is a very dynamic
ratio.

CH2+OH=12.01+2(1.01)+16,00+1.01=14.03+17.01=31.04 g/
mol

Si/Ge=28.09/72.61=0.38686

(0.38686)(31.04)=12.008

C=12.01

12.008
100 = 99.98%
12.01
 8 of 45

2CH2=2(12.01+2.02)=28.06

CO=12.01+16.00=28.01

NH2=14.01+2.02=16.03

28.06+28.01+16.03=72.1

Ge=72.64

72.1
100 = 99.2566%
72.64
The idea is to try to understand biological life, in particular its
origins, by looking at something we understand, artificial intelli-
gence.

The equations imply:

H3 N
Ge ≈ Si
COO
In the famous Miller-Urey experiment the primordial earth was
considered to be water (H2O) methane (CH4) and ammonia
(NH3). By mixing these in a flask and running electricity
through the mixture they produced about half the of 21 biologi-
cal amino acids. I presented these primordial compounds as hav-
ing a connection to AI in the second book. They seems to be re-
lated to primitive AI which would be a tungsten filament (W)
encased in a glass tube (SiO2) to make vacuum tubes for switch-
es as follows:

W H O NH3
≈ 2 + +1
SiO2 CH4 CH4
Thus We have three sets of equations from these works that are
of particular interest:
 9 of 45

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge
1. = 0.72
Ge2 1+
Si2
Ge 2

Si Ge 2SiGe
2. (As − Ga) + (P − Al ) =
B B Si + Ge

H3 N
3. (CH2 + OH ) = C
COO
Si
(2CH2 + CO + NH2) = Si
Ge
H3 N
Ge ≈ Si
COO

Since the square root of three is important in that it is the ratio of

the side of an equilateral triangle to its radius, where the radius is
the distance from the center of the triangle to a vertex, we will
write that:

3 − 1 = 0.732 ≈ 0.72

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge
= 0.72
Ge2 1+
Si2
Ge 2
 10 of 45

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge
+1≈ 3
Ge2 1+
Si2
Ge 2

Si3 + Si2Ge + 2SiGe2 + Ge3

= 3
Ge(Si2 + Ge2)

2Si Si3
+ +1= 3
Ge( 2 + 1) Ge ( 2 + 1)
Si2 3 Si2
Ge Ge

Now let’s look at the second equation in equation set three. It is:

Si
(2CH2 + CO + NH2) = Si
Ge
It can be written:

2CH2 CO NH2
+ + =1
Ge Ge Ge
Let us now consider it with respect to the equation we just
formed, which is:

2Si Si3
+ +1= 3
Ge( 2 + 1) Ge ( 2 + 1)
Si2 3 Si2
Ge Ge

2CH2, and CO, and NH2, are important because while NH3,
and CH4 are the primordial compounds from which some amino
acids can be made, the primordial compounds are made from
these. We have already said that:
 11 of 45

W H O NH3
≈ 2 + +1
SiO2 CH4 CH4
Relates the primitive AI to the primordial compounds. It is at this
point that I bring up a very interesting equation that I had come
up with several years ago. But, we first need to take a detour…

Detour
We can derive the golden ratio as such (refer to fig 13):

a b
= = Φ

b c
a = b + c

ac = b 2

c = a − b

a(a − b) = b 2

a 2 − ab − b 2 = 0

a2 a
− − 1 = 0

b2 b
 12 of 45

a2 a 1 1
− + = 1 +

b2 b 4 4

(b)
2
a a 1 1
− + =1+

b 4 4

(b)
2
a a 1 4 1 5
− + = + =

b 4 4 4 4

(b 2)
2
a 1 5
− =

a 1 5
− =

b 2 2
5+1
Φ=

2
b 5−1
ϕ= =

a 2
Let us say a/b=x, the golden ratio. Then,…

x 2 − x − 1 = 0

Let us differentiate this implicitly:

d 2 d d
x − x− 1 = 0

dx dx dx
2x − 1 = 0

1
x=

2
 13 of 45

Which is similar to Euler’s number, e because it is the base

d x
such that e is itself e x:

dx
d x
e = e x

dx
But

2
sin 45∘ = cos45∘ =

2
Which says for this angle the x-component equals the y-
1 ∘
component is 90 that is , x=1/2 bisects a right angle.
2
Which similar in concept to Euler’s number e because it is
d x
the base such that e is itself e x . But if
dx
2
sin 45∘ = cos45∘ = , then:

2
π
2cos = 2

4
It is the diagonal of the unit square. We notice something
interesting happens:

π
2cos =

n
π π π
2cos = 2 , 2cos = Φ, 2cos = 3

4 5 6
Where 3 is the cosine of 30 degrees, in the unit equilat-
eral triangle in which the altitude has been drawn in (fig
14):

 14 of 45

Since air is 25% N2 and 75% O2, the molar mass of air as
a mixture is 29.0 g/mol. I found air over H2O is the golden
ratio, and in total that:

air
≈ Φ

H2O
0.75N2 + 0.25O2 ≈ air

(4) (5) ( 6 )( Se ) H2O

π π π Zn air
−2cos + 2cos + 2cos ≈

(4) (5) (6)

π π π
2cos = 2, 2cos = Φ, 2cos = 3

Where ZnSe is zinc selenide, an intrinsic semiconductor,

intrinsic meaning that it does not have to be doped to
semiconduct.

Returning From The Detour

We have several equations in three terms on the left:

 15 of 45

2CH2 CO NH2
+ + = 1

Ge Ge Ge
2Si Si3
+ +1= 3

Ge( 2 + 1) Ge ( 2 + 1)
Si2 3 Si2
Ge Ge

(4) (5) ( 6 )( Se ) H2O

π π π Zn air
−2cos + 2cos + 2cos ≈

And,…

W H O NH3
≈ 2 + + 1

SiO2 CH4 CH4

air
Since ≈ Φ, we are just missing 2 . The first equa-
H2O
tion for the amino acid with the number 1 on the right is
inclusive in our scheme in that:

π
2cos = 1

3
Where we find the square root of two is interesting; we are
all familiar with the golden ratio phi in the human body. For
instance in the height divided by the distance from the
bottom of the feet to the navel. But, the answer comes
from archaeology.

The intermembral index compares the forelimbs of verte-

brates to their hindlimbs. A ratio greater than one means
the forelimbs are longer than the hindlimbs and less than
one the hindlimbs are longer. It is this ratio that tells pale-
ontologists a great deal about the manner of propulsion of
a vertebrate.

 16 of 45

The chimpanzee index is 106, or 1.06 in other words as a

fraction, meaning their forelimbs are longer than their
hindlimbs compared to humans, which are around 68-70
or 0.68 to 0.7 meaning their hindlimbs are longer than their
forelimbs. Thus we see they have their forelimbs are
longer for climbing, arm hanging and swinging activities.
The longer hindlimb of humans means they depend sole
on these for propulsion in bipedal walking. Lucy, the 3.2
million year old hominid (Australopithecus Afarensis) has
index 88 (0.88) intermediate between humans and chim-
panzees, and this due to a shortened humerus, not elon-
gated thigh, showing arm length reduced first in the evolu-
tionary trend toward being bipedal. She probably used
hindlimb for bipedal propulsion and forelimbs for climbing.

Measuring myself I find I have humerus+radius=22”, and

femur+tibia=32”. My intermembral index is about
i=22/32=0.6875. And here is our 2 :

1 1
= = 1.42857 ≈ 2 = 1.414

i 0.7
Are we evolving towards an intermembral index of 2 ?

 17 of 45

Though I did not derive these equations, but guessed at them, it

was an educated guess which proceeded from the argument, that
the first planet being the closest to the Sun, sets the idea in mo-
tion, that idea being that its distance is in the simplest expression
between Si, and Ge, possible; the ratio between them. Thus for
Mercury (P1) we have

Si
P1 =
Ge
In astronomical units because we take an astronomical unit to be
1 AU at earth orbit, because the earth is the one planets in the
solar system that is highly hospitable to life.

To make our guess at the distance of the next planet, we first

guess at the simplest idea r(n)=n. Seeing this does not work we
go the next simplest expression r(n)=2n. Seeing this does not
work we go one step higher in complexity and try r (n) = n 2.
We see this does not work either so we go one step of complexity
beyond that and we try r (n) = 2n. And, we find this works. But
it must be tempered with a factor of 0.3 and and adjusted by 0.4.
Thus we have the Titius-Bode Rule for the distribution of the
planets:

r (n) = 0.4 + (0.3)2n

n = − ∞, 0,1, 2,…
To get the next equation for P2 = Venus. Since we are dealing
Si
with a doubling effect we guess it is 2P1, or 2 . Which is
Ge
close but a little too high. So we guess at something lower and
that it involves twice their product and something big, like the
sum of their squares to reduce the number to prevent the product
from being too large. We guess that that value then is
 18 of 45

2SiGe
. This is a little too low so we average the two to get
Si2 + Ge2
exactly the result we need:

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge
P2 =
Ge2 1+
Si2
Ge 2

Since the next planet, our Earth, must be at a greater value than
2SiGe
Venus, and the uppercase scenario for Venus is , we
Si2 + Ge2
want to reduce 2SiGe by an amount less than the sum of their
squares, we reduce it by the difference of their squares and get
for Earth:

2SiGe
P3 =
Ge2 − Si2
It takes a bit of doing, but the next planet (P4 = Mars) is:

2SiGe2
P4 =
(Si − Ge)2(Si + Ge)
The next location is the asteroids from 2.2 AU-3.2 AU. Since
Mars is the last terrestrial planet (solid), and the asteroid is a
bunch of rocks that could not form into a solid planet and after
the asteroids we have the gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus,
Neptune…and this represents a flipping around point around the
asteroid belt, I started counting again with a new pattern starting
with Jupiter as P1, and flipped the Earth equation and turned a
minus sign to a plus to obtain the Jupiter equation, which is a
quadratic in its simplest form in the numerator, and a product in
its simplest form in the denominator, which is great because it is
the first planet after the asteroid belt and is hence:
 19 of 45

Si2 + 2SiGe + Ge2

P1 =
SiGe
Now what happens is that a simple pattern forms. We simply
multiply Jupiter by 2 to get Saturn, then by four to get Uranus,
and finally by six to get Neptune. We have:

2(Si + Ge2
P2 = Sat ur n =
SiGe
4(Si + Ge2
P3 = Uranus =
SiGe
6(Si + Ge2
P4 = Nept une =
SiGe
Thus we have the following table:

 20 of 45



 21 of 45

Another Scheme
The rate at which the distance from the sun a planet’s orbit is
increases with the planets number. But as you reach a certain
critical distance from the Sun the motive force responsible for
this effect stops feeling this effect and even though position r(n)
increases with respect to planetary number, n, at a certain point
the RATE of increasing, decreases. Hence the predicted value of
38.8 AU for Neptune, but the actual value of 30 AU in this rule.

I had developed another scheme for the planets where we can

look at this:
 22 of 45

We approach it like this,

Uranus. (2n-1) n=2i i=3

Neptune (2n+1). n=2i-1. I=4

If the rate at which the planets decrease from 4i-3 is a decrease

to 4i-1, we have:

d 4i − 3 8
=−
di 4i − 1 (4i − 3)2
For the rate of decrease after some inflection point between
Uranus and Neptune say at i=3.5:

8 8 AU
− =− = − 0.066
(4i − 3)2 21 AU

The Protoplanetary Disc

But, why describe the orbits of the planets in terms of AI Semi-
conducting elements? My answer is to do something cosmic:
there is great satisfaction in finding the connection between two
things that seem universes apart. And here I present a reason for
 23 of 45

looking at such a thing, by considering the protoplanetary disc

from which the planets formed. First we form a table of the
masses of the planets.
 24 of 45

Si + Ge 2.33 + 5.323
= = 3.8265g/cm3
2 2
Taking the protoplanetary disc as a thin disc we integrate from its
center to the edge, with density decreasing linearly to zero at the
edge. Thus, if the density function is given by

( R)
r
ρ(r) = ρ0 1 −

And, our integral is

∫0 ( R)
2π R
r
∫0
M= ρ0 1 − rdrdθ

πρ0 R 2
M=
3
π (3.8265)(7.4 × 1014)2
= 2.194 × 1030 gram s
3
The mass of the solar system adding up all the planets yields

M = 2.668 × 1030 gram s

That accounts for

2.194
100 = 82% of the mass of the solar system not includ-
2.668
ing the sun, that is, of the protoplanetary disc surrounding the
sun.

Using germanium alone, we get,

 25 of 45

π (5.323)(7.4 × 1014)2
= 3.05 × 1030 gram s
3
If we weight the mixture of silicon and germanium as 1/3 and
2/3, then we have

π (4.32467)(7.4 × 1014)2
= 2.48 × 1030 gram s
3
Which is very close.

2.48
100 = 93%
2.668
This is all very good, because I only used the planets and aster-
oids.

Weighting silicon and germanium as 1/4 and 3/4 we have

π (4.4 . 57475)(7.4 × 1014)2

= 2.623 × 1030 gram s
3
Which accounts for

2.623
100 = 98%
2.668
Of the mass of the solar system (very accurate).

This mixture of 1/4 to 3/4 is a combination that exists in the

Earth atmosphere which is approximately the mixture of oxygen
to nitrogen. The earth atmosphere can be considered a mixture of
chiefly O2 and N2 in these proportions:
 26 of 45

Air is about 25% oxygen gas (O2) by volume and 75% nitrogen
gas (N2) by volume meaning the molar mass of air as a mixture
is:

0.25O2 + 0.75N2 ≈ air

By molar mass the ratio of air to H20 (water) is about the golden
ratio:

air
≈Φ
H2O
I am not saying the solar system was a thin disk with density of
the weighted mean somewhere between silicon and germanium,
but that it can be modeled as such, though if the protoplanetary
disk that eclipses epsilon aurigae every 27 years is any indication
of what a protoplanetary cloud is like, it is a thin disk in the
sense that it is about 1 AU thick and 10 AU in diameter. This
around a star orbiting another star.

The Planets in Binary Digital Logic

I have devised a scheme for the planets in terms of the golden
ratio conjugate phi (ϕ) and Euler’s number e:

(1 − ϕ)e ϕ = 0.7AU = Venus

ϕe (1−ϕ) = 0.9AU = Ear th

ϕ 2e (2−ϕ) = 1.52 = Mars

2ϕe (2−ϕ) = 4.9 = Jupiter

4ϕe (2−ϕ) = 10 = Sat ur n

8ϕe (2−ϕ) = 19.69 = Uranus

 27 of 45

16ϕe (2−ϕ) = 39.38 = Nept une

So that Pn = 2nϕe (2−ϕ) for the planets exterior to the as-

teroid belt or Pn = c2n where c = ϕe (2−ϕ) = 2.461 is
c20 = c = 2.461 is the asteroid belt (P0).
5−1
ϕ= .
2
P1 = Jupiter
P2 = Satur n
P3 = Uranus
P4 = Neptune
Which is the solution to the differential equation

d2 y dy 2
− 2log(2) + log (2)y = 0
dn 2 dn
Where have we seen this? In computer science.

log2 N = n means 2n = N

Where n is the number of bits in a number N in binary. We

write in binary

0=0
1=1
10=2
11=3
100=4
101=5
110=6
111=7
 28 of 45

1000=8
1001=9
1010=10
1011=11
1100=12
1101=13
1110=14
1111=15
10000=16…

But what is interesting about this?

log23 = n

log3
n= = 1.5847
log2
You can’t have a fractional number of bits, thus the spec-
trum is quantized according to whole number solutions of

2n = N
But so are the planets given by

Pn = c2n
2ϕe (2−ϕ) = 4.9 = Jupiter

4ϕe (2−ϕ) = 10 = Sat ur n

8ϕe (2−ϕ) = 19.69 = Uranus

16ϕe (2−ϕ) = 39.38 = Nept une

 29 of 45

Meaning, since we have 2, 4, 8. 16 that the planets are quantized

into whole number orbits according to computer binary with
Jupiter as 2, Saturn as 4, Uranus as 8, and Neptune as 16 if we do
it in terms of Euler’s number, e and the golden ratio conjugate,
ϕ.
That is, 2=10, 4=100, 8=1000, 16=10000

Are all zeros after a one. Perhaps this ties into the planets in
terms of Si and Ge, since they make the digital binary circuits.

Weird Arithmetic

Since the planets seemed to defy a single expression for their

distribution, I decided something weird was going on. So, in or-
der to find an algorithm for them, I decided to create a weird
arithmetic. To do this I decided to change the order of operations
in an expression, and chose the equation of a straight line:

y=mx+b

I decided that the slope m should be 2 because for

∫
x 2d x

We use the identity

n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
12 + 22 + 32 + … + n 2 =
6
Because

n→∞ ∑ ( n ) n
4 n
4i 2 4
∫1
2
x d x = lim
i=1
 30 of 45

n3 ( )
64 n(n + 1)(2n + 1) 64
= lim =
n→∞ 6 3
I decided that b should be -3 because the Earth is the third planet.
So to do weird arithmetic I thought in

y=2x-3

That, the weird evaluation would be done by doing addition first

so we take x-3 first then do multiplication yielding

2n − 3 → 2(n − 3)
Which is

2(n − 3) = 2n − 6
I then compared the regular arithmetic to the weird arithmetic by
evaluating

2n − 3
2n − 6
In a Taylor expansion yielding:

2n − 3 1 n n2 n3 n4
= − − − − + O(n 5)
2n − 6 2 6 18 54 162
Since 1/2=0.5 is approximately Mercury orbit (0.4) I took the
n2
third term as Earth which since it needed to be 1.00AU I
18
chose n as n = 18 which gave the orbits of the planets:

n= 18 = 4.24264
 31 of 45

1
= 0.5 = mercur y = 0.4AU
2
n
= 0.7 = venus = 0.72AU
6
n2
= 1.00 = ear th = 1.00AU
18
n3
= 1.412 ≈ 2 = m ars = 1.52AU
54
n4
= 1.999 ≈ 2 = asteroids = 2AU − 3AU
162
Then after the asteroids it skips to n to the sixth for Jupiter:

n6
= 3.99 = jupiter = 5.2AU
1458
n9
= 11.31AU = sat ur n = 9.5AU
39366
n 11
= 22.624AU = uranus = 19AU
354294
n 12
= 32AU = nept une = 30AU
1062882
Thus the equation for the planets is:

( 2 6 18 54 162 )
1 n n2 n3 n4
, , , ,
 32 of 45

Which is

( 2 2 ⋅ 3i )
1 ni
Pi = , ,...

i=(1, 2, 3, 4, 5..)

n1 n
P1 = =
2 ⋅ 31 6
n2 n2
P2 = =
2 ⋅ 32 18
.
.
.
Starting with Venus as P1. The Taylor expansion is:
∞
f n(a) f′′(a)
(x − a)n = f (a) + f′(a)(x − a) + (x − a)2 + …
∑ n! 2!
n=0

2x − 3 → 2(x − 3)
Comparing regular arithmetic to weird arithmetic:

2x − 3
2x − 6
d (2x − 3) f′(x)g(x) − g′(x)f (x)
=
dx (2x − 6) g(x)2
2(2x − 6) − 2(2x − 3)
f′(x) =
(2x − 6)2
 33 of 45

f′(0) = − 1/6
x
f′(a)(x − a) = −
6
f′′(a) 2 x2
(x − a) = −
2! 18
f′′′(a) 3 x3
(x − a) = −
3! 54
1
f (0) =
2
Since the equation for the distribution of the planets would
the solution of a differential equation, the equation for the
distribution being:

ni
Pi =
2 ⋅ 3i
Then we integrate to obtain:

ni 3i n i
∫ 2 ⋅ 3i
di = +C
2log( 3 )
n

Let us explore the planetary equation a little…


 34 of 45

We cannot write the equation of the planets as one equa-

tion but we can make a program that outlines its logic.
Here I do it in C:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double r, n=4.24264;
int i;
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {

for (i=0;i<5;i++)
{
r=pow(n,i)/(2*(pow(3,i)));

printf("%f",r);
printf("\n");
}

int k=4;
int i=6;
while (k>0)
{
k=k-1;

r=(pow(n,i))/(2*(pow(3,i)));
i=i+k;

printf("%f", r);
printf("\n");
}
return 0;
}
 35 of 45

And running it:

Ians-MBP:~ beardsleyian$ /Users/beards-

leyian/Desktop/exploring\ P_n/weird ; exit;
0.500000
0.707107
1.000000
1.414213
1.999999
3.999996
11.313692
22.627377
31.999938
logout
Saving session...

 36 of 45

We can plot the equation 2n-3 with its weird counterpart 2n-6,
which are parallel, then drop a vertical, and a perpendicular
which makes the triangle 2, 5 , 3:

 37 of 45

We can plot the actual planets Y1 and that of the Taylor expan-
sion of (2n-3)/(2n-6) to get:
 38 of 45

The Geometry
Not only is the Venus equation perfect in the equation set in
terms of AI elements, but in the Mars equation in terms of ϕ and
e in the equation set in terms of these constants. We have:

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge
venus = = 0.72AU
Ge2 1+
Si2
Ge 2

Mars = ϕ 2e 2−ϕ = 1.52AU

Let us solve for x in:

1.52=0.72x

x=2.11111=19/9

This is very close to fluorine (F) over beryllium (Be):

F 19.00g/m ol
= = 2.108768 ≈ 2.1
Be 9.01g/m ol
Beryllium (see illustrations) is pivotal to the production of car-
bon, which is in turn the core element to biological life com-
pounds. Stars produce carbon by combining two helium (He)
atoms to make Beryllium. The Beryllium then combines with
another helium atom to make carbon. Beryllium rarely occurs in
Nature because it is usually depleted in the reaction in stars using
it to make heavier elements. I found a connection of beryllium to
carbon by way of silicon. The radius of silicon is Si=0.118nm. If
we say it is inscribed in a dodecagon (12 sided) regular polygon
of side 1, then carbon inscribes in a regular octagon (8 sided) of
side 1. This is the eight of The beryllium-8 (four protons, four
neutrons) that makes carbon by combining with helium.

 39 of 45



 40 of 45

 41 of 45

Flourine is the most electronegative element making it highly

reactive. It reacts with everything but argon, neon, and helium.
Flourine combines with carbon to make fluorocarbons. The pri-
mary mineral source is fluorite and is mined for steelmaking
which turn results in byproducts used aluminum refining. Its
electron configuration is 1S 2 2S 2 P 5, giving it seven outer elec-
trons so that it needs one more to be filled, to give it eight outer
electrons because it tends to capture an electron to make it iso-
electronic with the noble, or inert gas neon.

Thus we have the following Equation that through the planets

Venus and Mars, the solid planets directly on either side of the
Earth, relates artificial intelligence to biological life:

Si3
1 2SiGe + Ge F
= ϕ 2e (2−ϕ)
Ge2 1+
Si2 Be
Ge 2
 42 of 45

We have that at the beginning of the Universe hydrogen and he-

lium were created. Then the stars formed and synthesized these
into the heavier elements. I find if we include in the category of
life not just the biological elements, but the AI elements, we can
find a mathematical equation for a pattern in the periodic table of
the elements that predicts the synthesis of such elements in stars.
For instance, Beryllium 8 plus helium 4 synthesizes to make the
biological core element carbon C. Magnesium plus helium 4
synthesized to make the core AI element silicon Si. If we say that
Element 4 is Beryllium Be and write it E4, and helium He is
element 2 and write it E2, and use this convention for all of the
elements, we have for the production of these elements by stars,
and their molar masses in the periodic table the following equa-
tion:

E2n−2 + E2 = E2i−2 = (4k + 4)g /m ol

n = (3,4, 5,6, …)
i = (4,5, 6,7, …)
k = (2,3, 4,5, …)
I show how this works on the next two pages in tables…

 43 of 45



 44 of 45



 45 of 45

The Author