Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Using Graphite Nanoparticles For Optimum Design of Water Based Drilling Fluid Case Study Azadegan1
Using Graphite Nanoparticles For Optimum Design of Water Based Drilling Fluid Case Study Azadegan1
Using Graphite Nanoparticles For Optimum Design of Water Based Drilling Fluid Case Study Azadegan1
net/publication/326843542
CITATION READS
1 999
3 authors, including:
Mohammad Bakhshandeh
University of Stavanger (UiS)
1 PUBLICATION 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohammad Bakhshandeh on 27 October 2018.
Abstract
Water-based drilling fluid is more important than gas-based and oil-based drilling fluids for
adaptability with environment and easy working with it. A water-based drilling fluid can have a
significant role in drilling operations with its desirable properties including rheology, fluid loss,
coefficient of friction (CF), pH, and fluid weight. This research studied the effect of nanoparticle
graphite effect on improving the properties of water-based drilling fluid in various experiments by
rotary viscometers, standard filter press, lubricity meter, pH-meter, and mud balance. In addition, fluid
loss control additives were used as a control to compare the obtained results from application of
nanoparticles and understanding the effect of their presence in experiments. Results showed that
graphite nanoparticles can increase yield point (YP) in mud (increased from 10 lb/100ft² to 12
lb/100ft²). Research results showed that graphite nanoparticles can reduce drilling fluid loss in 100psi
and T=75°F about 22% (from 4.5cc to 3.5cc during 30 min). Moreover, research results showed that
graphite nanoparticles can reduce friction coefficient to 58%.
Keywords: drilling fluid, graphite nanoparticles, rheology properties, fluid loss, friction coefficient
16
EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 11: 16-21 (2017) Rostami et al.
17
EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 11: 16-21 (2017) Rostami et al.
Table 1. Chemical and physical properties of graphite Table 4. Formulation of the basic fluid
nanoparticles Starch
Pac Sodium Potassium Soda Xanthan Glay
limestone
Caustic
Shape Solid powder lv chloride chloride ash gum col soda
Color Black 10 2 17/5 17/5 1 0/7
1% 116 lb/bbl 1 lb/bbl
pH 6.5-8.5 lb/bbl lb/bbl lb/bbl lb/bbl lb/bbl lb/bbl
Nanoparticles (nm) 30-80
Solubility Insoluble in water
Table 5. Introduction of samples
A Basic fluid
Table 2. Physical and chemical properties of Xanthan gum p1 Basic fluid+ 1 Lb/bbl graphite nanoparticles
Shape Solid powder p2 Basic fluid+ 2 Lb/bbl graphite nanoparticles
color Yellowish white p3 Basic fluid+ 3 Lb/bbl graphite nanoparticles
pH 6-7 p4 Basic fluid+ 4 Lb/bbl graphite nanoparticles
Flash point >100°C p5 Basic fluid+ 5 Lb/bbl graphite nanoparticles
Solubility soluble in water
a good resistance against calcium ion (Committee
Table 3. Physical and chemical properties of poly-anionic 2011).
cellulose Table 3 shows the physical and chemical properties
Shape Solid powder
color Oyster white of this material.
pH 5.6-5.8 Technic of preparing fluids
Flash point >100°C
Solubility soluble in water Tests on water-glycol based fluid were conducted in
Azadegan field. In these tests, devices such as rotary
atoms with 120 angle and bond length of 42.1°A. The viscometers, standard filter press, lubricity meter, pH-
interaction among layers in graphite is the weak Van der meter, and mud scale. First, basic fluid was prepared.
waals forces. Therefore, this interaction is weak so The preparation of this fluid includes various steps that
graphene layers (one single layer of graphite) can slip all must be conducted accurately to reach the logical
over the layer and gives the properties of a good results.
lubricant to his material (Avinash et al. 2010). This In the first step of preparing fluid, the needed fresh
compound is made of many graphene layers and is water weight was 62.4 pcf that was used in mud tanks
accessible and cheap in nature. This carbon allotrope (in laboratory each barrel equal to 350cc). Then, 1%
carbon is both in nature and is synthetized by the volumic ethylene glycol was added and later 17.5 lb per
present thermal decomposition processes (Schafhaeutl barrel Sodium chlorid was added as weight additives
1840). and 17.5 lb per barrel potassium chloride was added to
Table 1 shows the chemical and physical properties system both as weight additives and shale inhibitor, that
of graphite nanoparticles. took the water weight to 67-68 pcf. In the next step, 1 lb
Biopolymer per barrel soda-ash was added to precipitate calcium
The used biopolymer in this research is xanthan and magnesium, then 10 lb per barrel starch and 2 lb per
gum. This material may be used in all types of brines. barrel Poly-anionic cellulose (PAC LV) were gently
Thermal sustainability of this material is 225°F. Xanthan added to system as the reducer of fluid loss. In the next
is the only polymer supplying the thixotropic properties step, 0.7 lb per barrel xanthan gum was added to
for drilling mud. This hetropolysaccharide includes 2 increase viscosity. . It should be noted that xanthan
units of glucose, 2 units of mannose, and 1 unit of should be added gently to prevent air bubble formation
gluconic acid with molar ratios of 2.8 and 2.2. The result in the fluid and polymer clotting. In the next step, 1 lb per
of aerobic fermentation of is xanthomonas bacterium barrel caustic soda was added to increase pH of system
(Garcia-Ochoa et al. 2000). The most popular used to 9.5 and system weight was increased to 74 pcf by
biopolymer in oil industry has been xanthomonas adding limestone (adding 116p to each barrel) in the last
bacterium that is used as viscosity enhancer (Beck et al. step. It is to be noticed that mixer was on in the tank of
1993). making drilling fluid to mix the materials well and prevent
Table 2 shows some physical and chemical their precipitations in all mentioned steps. Then, various
properties of this biopolymer. samples can be made by adding various concentrations
Poly-anionic cellulose by adding nanoparticles. It is to be noticed that
Poly-anionic cellulose with low viscosity (PAC LV) nanoparticles must be added gently as not to make
has been used as a standard controlling additive of loss coagulation in samples. Table 4 shows the formulation
to compare the performance of nanoparticles in of the basic fluid briefly.
controlling fluid loss. Actually, this material can control Prepared samples
fluid loss without making any significant enhance in fluid Table 5 mentioned basic fluid and five other samples
volume. This material shows more resistance against with the consumed graphite nanoparticles.
hardness. Poly-anionic damage temperature starts from
250°F. Cellulose poly-anionic can be used in both salty
and sweet waters. Cellulose poly-anionic polymer shows
18
EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 11: 16-21 (2017) Rostami et al.
Table 7. Effect of graphite nanoparticles on fluid weight and Table 10. PV and YP values for basic fluid and 5 other
PH samples
Samples A p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 Samples A P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
MW(pcf) 74 74 74 74/1 74/1 74/1 PV(cp) 13 13 13 14 15 16
PH 9/5 9/5 9/5 9/5 9/5 9/5 YP((Ibf/100ft2) 10 10 11 11 12 12
Table 8. Results of rotary viscosity-meter in the presence Table 11. Values fluid loss for basic fluid and five samples
of graphite nanoparticles for the basic fluid and 5 other containing graphite nanoparticles
samples Samples A p1 p2 p3 p4 p5
Samples A p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 fluid loss (cc) 4.5 4.5 4. 2 4 3.8 3.5
rate (RPM) Degree of deviation for rotary viscosity-meter
600 36 36 37 39 42 44
300 23 23 24 25 27 28
200 18 18 19 20 23 24
100 14 14 15 17 17 18
6 4 4 4 5 6 6
3 3 3 3 3 4 5
1
Friction Coefficient
19
EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 11: 16-21 (2017) Rostami et al.
Table 12. Friction coefficient values for the basic fluid and showed that graphite nanoparticles such as
five samples containing graphite nanoparticles nanocomposites and clay nanoparticles have the
Samples A p1 p2 p3 p4 p5
angle Ɵ 9.5 9.5 8/5 7 5 4
significant role in reduction of fluid loss. Therefore,
FC 0.1673 0.1673 0.1495 0.1228 0.0875 0.0699 it is concluded based on the obtained results from
test that using graphite nanoparticles as the
additive materials to the drilling fluid improves its
loss. Consequently, good results are obtained by
this technic in high depths where controlling loss is
very sophisticated. Regarding to this matters,
adding graphite nanoparticles to the drilling fluid
blocks cracks and fractures of the formations for
the small size of nanoparticles and loss will reach
its minimum value by this technic.
4) It was observed by lubricity meter device and the
obtained results through measuring FC that the FC
of the basic fluid was 0.1673, while lubricity of filter
cakes increased for the same fluid by adding
Fig. 5. The comparison between FC with presence of graphite nanoparticles. Consequently, they slip in
graphite nanoparticles smaller than the specific angle which finally reduce
FC to 0.0699 (means 58% reduction). This, it is
Table 12 and Fig. 5 show the effect of graphite concluded that graphite nanoparticles reduce FC,
nanoparticles on friction coefficient. but other nanoparticles such as clay nanoparticles
and nanocomposites and nano-bentonite that were
CONCLUSION used previously didn’t have such capacity. This FC
reduction by graphite nanoparticles in the slant
According to the conducted tests on the basic fluids
wells, particularly in the contacting points of drilling
and 5 other sample fluids containing graphite
pipe with well walls greatly help and prevent
nanoparticles the following results were obtained:
abrasion increase between well wall and pipe.
1) Non-effectiveness of graphite nanoparticles on
fluid weight and pH: the basic fluid weight is 5) According to the obtained results, it is concluded
74PCF, but the maximum weight of samples by that graphite nanoparticles are effective on more
adding nanoparticles was 74.1PCF. It means they properties of drilling fluid, but the other
had 0.1 PCF that is not considered a significant nanoparticles such as bentonite particles,
increase. PH for the basic fluid and five other nanocomposites, and clay nanoparticle influence
samples was 9.5, and no change was seen after only on one or two properties of drilling fluid.
adding graphite nanoparticles in samples pH.
2) Graphite nanoparticles increases yield point in SUGGESTIONS
mud. As the yield point for the basic fluid is 10 1) Tests can be conducted on several other fields to
lb/100ft² and sample p5 has the maximum graphite study the effectiveness of graphite nanoparticles
nanoparticles, yield point became 12 lb/100ft²; it better.
means YP increased 2 lb/100ft². Since YP has 2) Other nanoparticles can be used beside graphite
more effect in cleansing the well, this increase nanoparticles which have desirable effect on
makes the well cleaner. Thus, it is concluded that weight and pH of drilling fluid.
graphite nanoparticles such as nanocomposites
and graphene nanoparticles improve rheological 3) The environmental and economic aspects of
properties. graphite nanoparticles can be studied.
3) Based on the obtained results from filter press 4) Extensive tests and research can be conducted on
device, if the basic fluid is used under the same the other characteristics of these materials based
temperature and pressure containing graphite on affluent advantages of graphite nanoparticles as
nanoparticles, fluid loss reduces to 3.5cc (about additives to the drilling fluid.
22% reduction). It means significant decrease was
observed during 30 min in fluid loss. These results
20
REFERENCES
Aghebati R (2008 Oct.) Presentation One Field: Design Development Azadegan Field. Scientific-Propagative
Journal of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. National Iranian Oil Co. 1387(51): 6-8.
Al-Tahini MAaAM (2009) Nano-Technology – Its Significance inSmart Fluid Development for Oil and Gas Field
Application. Presented at the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium.
Al-Zubaidi NS, Alwasiti AA, Mahmood D (2016) A comparison of nano bentonite and some nano chemical additives
to improve drilling fluid using local clay and commercial bentonites. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum.
Avinash M et al. (2010) Covalent modification and exfoliation of graphene oxide using ferrocene. Nanoscale 2(9):
1762-1766. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00024h
Beck FE, Powell JW, Zamora M (1993) A clarified Xanthan drill-in fluid for Prudhoe Bay horizontal wells. In SPE/IADC
Drilling Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/25767-MS
Berret JF, Yokota K, Morvan M (2007) Interactions between Polymers and Nanoparticles: Formation of
“Supermicellar” Hybrid Aggregates. Soft materials 2(2-3): 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1081/SMTS-200056090
Binks BP (2010) Influence of nanoparticle addition to winsor surfactant micro emulsion systems. Colloids and
surfaces A: physicochemical and engineering aspect 363: 10-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.03.045
Committee ASS (2011) Drilling fluids processing handbook. Elsevier.
Drilling Fluids Manual (2004) Amoco Production Company USA,1995.
Fink JK (2012) Petroleum Engineer’s Guide to Oil Field Chemicals and Fluids. Elsevier Science.
Garcia-Ochoa F et al. (2000) Xanthan gum: production, recovery, and properties. Biotechnology advances 18(7):
549-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00050-1
Hoelscher KP et al. (2013) Application of nanotechnology in drilling fluids. in SPE international oilfield
nanotechnology conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Jain R, Mahto V (2015) Evaluation of polyacrylamide/clay composite as a potential drilling fluid additive in inhibitive
water based drilling fluid system. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 133: 612-621.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.07.009
Schafhaeutl C (1840) LXXXVI. On the combinations of carbon with silicon and iron, and other metals, forming the
different species of cast iron, steel, and malleable iron. The London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and
Journal of Science 16(106): 570-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786444008650094
Shakib JT, Kanani V, Pourafshary P (2016) Nano-clays as additives for controlling filtration properties of water–
bentonite suspensions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 138: 257-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.018
Swaco M (March 1998) Engineering drilling fluid manual. MI Swaco.
www.ejobios.org
21