Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

EVALUAREA INCARCARII DIN ZAPADA EVALUAREA INCARCARII DIN VANT

Invelitoare: tabla ondulata μ1: 0.8 qp(ze) (KN/m2) 1.02


α1 (⁰): 30 μ2: 1.6 ze: ~10m
α2 (⁰): 36 c t: 1 cpe: 0.7
L1 (m): 5.68 c e: 1 ce(ze): 1.7
L2 (m): 4.5 γIs: 1 qb (KN/m2): 0.6
2
Hs (m): 3.28 sk (KN/m ): 1.5

p (KN/m2): 0.22 s (KN/m2): 1.2 we (KN/m2): 0.71

Obs. : la evaluarea incarcarilor s-au luat in considerare cazurile cele mai defavorabile

CALCULUL ELEMENTELOR SARPANTEI


a) capriori
Caprior 1 2
bc (m): 0.12 0.1
hc (m): 0.12 0.12 Ipoteza 1 Verificare la deformatie
α (⁰): 30 36 Caprior 1 2
pcp (KN/m): 0.16 0.17 l (m): 3.29 2.66
scp (KN/m): 0.77 0.75 fadm (cm): 1.65 1.33
wcp (KN/m): 0.61 0.68 EI (KNm2): 155.52 129.6
Pcp (KN): 0.87 0.81 fpcp (cm): 0.24 0.13
d1 (m): 0.85 0.95 fscp (cm): 0.94 0.47
d2 (m): 2.8 2.15 fwcp (cm): 0.60 0.34
Ipoteza 2 fPcp (cm): 0.41 0.24
Mef(1) (KNm): 1.96 1.19 f(1) (cm): 1.59 0.84
Mef(2) (KNm): 1.12 0.78 f(2) (cm): 0.65 0.37
fmax (cm): 1.59 0.84
Mcap (KNm): 3.21 2.67
Ri (KN/m2): 16800 16800 Conditia de verificare
Ric (KN/m2): 8247.3 8247.3 1.59 < 1.65 ✔
W calc (m3): 0.000432 0.00036 0.84 < 1.33 ✔

Conditia de verificare
1.96 < 3.21 ✔
1.19 < 2.67 ✔
b) pane Ipoteza 1
Pana 1 Mef(1),x (KNm): 14.43
bp (m): 0.25 Mef(1),y (KNm): 2.12
hp (m): 0.25 ? Mef(2),x (KNm): 3.25
lc (m): 3.45 Mef(2),y (KNm): 0.00
d (m): 3.29
pyp (KN/m): 0.97 Mr,xp (KNm): 19.33
p
px (KN/m): 0 Mr,yp (KNm): 19.33
syp (KN/m): 3.95 Ric (KN/m2): 8247.27
sxp (KN/m): 0 W calc,x (m3): 0.0026 Ipoteza 2
p
w (KN/m): 2.71 W calc,y (m3): 0.0026
wxp (KN/m): 1.36
wyp (KN/m): 2.35
Pyp (KN/m): 1

Conditia de verificare
0.86 < 1 ✔

Verificare la sageata
Pana 1
lc (m): 3.45
fadm (cm): 1.73
f(1)xp (cm): 0.00 f(2)p (cm): 0.00
p
fxp (cm): 0.0000 fypp (cm): 0.0009
fxsp (cm): 0.0000 fyPp (cm): 0.0003
fxwp (cm): 0.0009
EIy (KNm2): 2929.69 Conditia de verificare
f(1)yp (cm): 0.01 0.01 < 1.73 ✔
fypp (cm): 0.0009
fysp (cm): 0.0031
fywp (cm): 0.0015
EIx (KNm2): 2929.69
f(1)p (cm): 0.01

c) popi
Pop central Verificare la compresiune (ULS)
d (m): 2.86 Acalc (m2): 0.014
α (⁰): 30 Rc║c (KN/m2): 6912
bpop (m): 0.12 λ (-) 89.36 Ipoteza 1:
hpop (m): 0.12 φ (-) 0.39 Cef(1)=(1.35*ppermpop+1.5*spop+1.05*wpop)*t+1.35*pprpop+1.35*qp
lpop (m): 3.10 Cr (KN): 34.78 Ipoteza 2:
ρ0.95 (KN/m3): 4.80 Cef(1) (KN): 31.56 Cef(2)=1.35*ppermpop*t+1.35*pprpop+1.35*qp+1.35*P
t (m): 3.60 Cef(2) (KN): 6.78
ppermpop (KN/m): 0.73
pprpop (KN/m): 0.21 Conditia de verificare
spop (KN/m): 3.44 31.56 < 34.78 ✔
wpop (KN/m): 2.04
Ppop (KN): 1.00
qp (KN): 1.08

d) verificarea talpii la strivire


Acalc,str (m2): 0.0135
Rc┴c (KN/m2): 5414.4
Cef,c┴ (KN/m2): 31.56
Cr,c┴ (KN/m2): 65.78

Obs.: am folosit lemn de stejar, clasa 2 de calitate, cu cep patrat

Conditia de verificare
31.56 < 65.78 ✔

You might also like