Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluarea Incarcarii Din Zapada Evaluarea Incarcarii Din Vant
Evaluarea Incarcarii Din Zapada Evaluarea Incarcarii Din Vant
Obs. : la evaluarea incarcarilor s-au luat in considerare cazurile cele mai defavorabile
Conditia de verificare
1.96 < 3.21 ✔
1.19 < 2.67 ✔
b) pane Ipoteza 1
Pana 1 Mef(1),x (KNm): 14.43
bp (m): 0.25 Mef(1),y (KNm): 2.12
hp (m): 0.25 ? Mef(2),x (KNm): 3.25
lc (m): 3.45 Mef(2),y (KNm): 0.00
d (m): 3.29
pyp (KN/m): 0.97 Mr,xp (KNm): 19.33
p
px (KN/m): 0 Mr,yp (KNm): 19.33
syp (KN/m): 3.95 Ric (KN/m2): 8247.27
sxp (KN/m): 0 W calc,x (m3): 0.0026 Ipoteza 2
p
w (KN/m): 2.71 W calc,y (m3): 0.0026
wxp (KN/m): 1.36
wyp (KN/m): 2.35
Pyp (KN/m): 1
Conditia de verificare
0.86 < 1 ✔
Verificare la sageata
Pana 1
lc (m): 3.45
fadm (cm): 1.73
f(1)xp (cm): 0.00 f(2)p (cm): 0.00
p
fxp (cm): 0.0000 fypp (cm): 0.0009
fxsp (cm): 0.0000 fyPp (cm): 0.0003
fxwp (cm): 0.0009
EIy (KNm2): 2929.69 Conditia de verificare
f(1)yp (cm): 0.01 0.01 < 1.73 ✔
fypp (cm): 0.0009
fysp (cm): 0.0031
fywp (cm): 0.0015
EIx (KNm2): 2929.69
f(1)p (cm): 0.01
c) popi
Pop central Verificare la compresiune (ULS)
d (m): 2.86 Acalc (m2): 0.014
α (⁰): 30 Rc║c (KN/m2): 6912
bpop (m): 0.12 λ (-) 89.36 Ipoteza 1:
hpop (m): 0.12 φ (-) 0.39 Cef(1)=(1.35*ppermpop+1.5*spop+1.05*wpop)*t+1.35*pprpop+1.35*qp
lpop (m): 3.10 Cr (KN): 34.78 Ipoteza 2:
ρ0.95 (KN/m3): 4.80 Cef(1) (KN): 31.56 Cef(2)=1.35*ppermpop*t+1.35*pprpop+1.35*qp+1.35*P
t (m): 3.60 Cef(2) (KN): 6.78
ppermpop (KN/m): 0.73
pprpop (KN/m): 0.21 Conditia de verificare
spop (KN/m): 3.44 31.56 < 34.78 ✔
wpop (KN/m): 2.04
Ppop (KN): 1.00
qp (KN): 1.08
Conditia de verificare
31.56 < 65.78 ✔