BM1707

Task Performance

Make a digest for each of the following cases.

A digest is a summary of the Supreme Court cases. It has three (3) parts: facts, issue, and ruling.
The facts part consists only of the essential facts relevant to the ruling in the case while the issue
should be relevant to the topic under which the case belongs. The ruling should answer the issue
raised in the case.

I. Elements of an obligation
 ASUNCION vs. CA, G.R. NO. 109125, December 2, 1994

II. Classification of obligations - as to basis and enforceability (Natural Obligations and Civil
Obligations)
 DBP vs. CONFESSOR, G.R. NO. L-48889 May 11, 1989

III. Sources of obligations

a) Obligations arising from law

 PELAYO V. LAURON 12 Phil. 453

b) Obligations arising from contracts

 METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY vs. ANA GRACE ROSALES AND YO YUK
TO, G.R. No. 183204, January 13, 2014

c) Obligations arising from quasi contract

i. negotiorum gestio
ADILLE vs. CA, G.R. NO. L-44546 January 29, 1988

ii. solutio indebiti

ANDRES vs. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER & TRUST CORPORATION, G.R. NO. 82670
September 15, 1989

d) Obligations arising from delict

NAPOCOR vs. CA, G.R. NO. 124378, March 8, 2005

VI. Nature and effects of obligation

A. Delay
1. Mora Solvendi
SANTOS VENTURA HOCORMA FOUNDATION, INC., vs. SANTOS, G.R. NO. 153004, November
5, 2004
2. Mora Accipiendi

04 Task Performance *Property of STI

Page 1 of 3
 BM1707

MANUEL vs. CA, G.R. NO. 95469 July 25, 1991

3. Compensatio Morae
CORTES vs. CA, G.R. NO. 126083, July 12, 2006

4. When demand not necessary

RODRIGO RIVERA VS. SPOUSES SALVADOR C. CHUA AND VIOLETA S. CHUA/ SPOUSES
SALVADOR C. CHUA AND VIOLETA S. CHUA VS. RODRIGO RIVERA, G.R. Nos. 184458/184472.
January 14, 2015 (1169)

B. Negligence

1. Degree of diligence
PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, MCGEE & CO., INC., G.R. NO. 162467, May
8, 2009

C. Fortuitous event
NAKPIL & SONS v. CA, G.R. NO. L-47851 April 15, 1988

VII. Kinds of civil obligations

A. Pure obligations
HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORP. vs. BROQUEZA, G.R. NO. 178610 November
17, 2010 (1179)

B. Conditional obligations

1. Suspensive condition
REYES vs. TUPARAN, G.R. NO. 188064, June 1, 2011

2. Resolutory condition
CENTRAL PHILIPPINE UNIVERSITY vs. CA, G.R. NO. 112230. July 17, 1995

C. Obligations with a period

ROWENA R. SOLANTE vs. COMMISSION ON AUDIT et. al. G.R. No. 207348, August 19, 2014,

D. Solidary obligation
SPOUSES CHIN KONG WONG CHOI AND ANA O. CHUA VS. UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS BANK,
G.R. No. 207747. March 11, 2015

E. Obligations with a penal clause

COUNTRY BANKERS V. COURT OF APPEALS 201 SCRA 458

04 Task Performance *Property of STI

Page 2 of 3
 BM1707

VIII. Extinguishment of obligations

A. Payment or performance
PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL BANK (now BDO UNIBANK, INC.), vs. ARTURO P.
FRANCO, substituted by his heirs, namely: MAURICIA P. FRANCO, FLORIBEL P. FRANCO, AND
ALEXANDER P. FRANC0, G.R. No. 180069, March 5, 2014 (1271)

B. Compensation
CESAR V. AREZA and LOLITA B. AREZA V EXPRESS SAVINGS BANK, INC. and MICHAEL
POTENCIANO. G.R No. 176697, September 10, 2014

C. Novation
LEONARDO BOGNOT vs. RRI LENDING CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL
MANAGER, DARIO J. BERNARDEZ, G.R. No. 180144, September 24, 2014

Rubric for grading: (8 cases x 10 points)

CRITERIA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS POINTS
Content Included significant facts and clear legal issues 6
and jurisdictions, provided clear conclusions and
answers.
Grammar Used correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and 1
capitalization.
Organization Expressed the points in clear and logical 2
of ideas arrangement of ideas in the paragraph
Format Adhered to the required style/appearance 1
Total 10

04 Task Performance *Property of STI

Page 3 of 3