Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Be Eckman S 1987
Be Eckman S 1987
following a brief interruption in the flow, Fig. 1. Schematic of the cyclone: I, Inlet; 0, gas out-
and only provided that the hopper beneath let; D, dipleg; Vl, V2, valves.
TABLE 1
Physical properties of particulate solids used
at most 30 s). The solids beneath the cyclone The rate of leakage of solids out the exit
were then removed by opening and closing duct was found to obey the following equa-
the lower valve, the upper valve was reopened tion:
slowly, and the pressure drop across the
cyclone was noted. The same sequence of dL, W
-=-
steps (except that of adding solids to the air dt r1
entering the cyclone) was repeated at regular
intervals, yielding data on the pressure drop Lo equals the cumulative quantity of solids
across the cyclone and on the loss of solids exiting the outlet duct, W equals the
via the dipleg, as functions of time. These inventory of solids in the cyclone at any point
experiments showed that some or all of the in time, and r1 is a time constant. The rate of
solids entering the cyclone were retained. loss of solids at any given instant is then
If the weight of solids entering the cyclone given by
WI exceeded a critical value I+‘(‘-‘)the excess
dW dL, + dL,
(i.e., Wr - WC”‘) immediately descended into (3)
the dipleg. The value of W@) depended on the -dt=dt dt
nature and sizedistribution of the solids The following equation was found by com-
(Table 2), with a trend towards larger values
bining eqns. (1) to (3) :
of W(O)with increasing size. However, shape
was also a factor since W(O)had by far the
highest value with the spherical glass beads. dW +
dt
w + Lu(f)
r1 r2 exp
= 0 (4)
TABLE 2
Parameters pertaining to trapped solids The solution of eqn. (4) is
t
71 - 72 i 71 I
-
+
Sand 0.22 3.7 0 Large
( i
Sand 0.29 2.4 10.1 2.1 21.4 71 L,(f)
Sand 0.38 10.6 12.0 3.2 7.4 pexp - - (5)
Sand 0.46 9.2 15.1 1.1 3.7 7-l- 72 72
Sand 0.55 2.7 18.3 4.0 5.0
Sand 1.09 5.8 18.5 2.5 6.0
Sand 2.12 43 18.4 4.0 6.6 Equation (1) was verified by measuring L,
Glass 1.13 0.72 57.3 9.5 1.3 directly as a function of time, using the two
valves at the base of the cyclone to extract
leaked solids at intervals of time without
disturbing flow in the cyclone. W was inferred
Subsequently, particles continuously from the pressure drop across the cyclone,
leaked both into the dipleg and out the exit using data on the relationship between
duct of the cyclone. Leakage into the dipleg pressure drop reduction and solids inventory,
occurred over a relatively short time span, and which are reported below. It was found that
could be described by an equation of the r1 3 r2, so that for t 9 72 eqn. (5) reduces to
following form:
the cyclone was noted, and the fan was shut Fig. 5. ad&., versus dp. 0, rounded sands; 0, angular
off. The solids found above and below the sand; m, salt; V, carbon; A, spherical glass beads.
upper valve were then collected separately
and weighed. The weight of solids found
above the upper valve equalled W, the weight DISCUSSION
of solids circulating in the cyclone at the time
the air flow was shut off. The rate of decay of trapped solids is
A typical plot of AP,, the cyclone pressure clearly governed by two mechanisms: leakage
drop reduction (i.e., the pressure drop across into the dipleg, characterized by a time
the cyclone in the absence of solids, minus constant which was usually smaller than 10
the pressure drop in the presence of trapped min (although in one case it equalled 43 min),
solids, at the same air inlet velocity), uersus and loss through the gas outlet, characterized
weight of trapped solids W is shown in Fig. 4. by a time constant measured in hours.
The mechanisms by which particles are
carried to the solids outlet do not appear to
be fully understood. It is known that cyclone
performance is relatively unaffected by its
orientation; in fact a cyclone can even be
operated satisfactorily upside down (ter
Linden [ 3]), which proves that dust which
has been collected at the walls is not carried
down primarily by gravity.
Two other mechanisms suggest themselves.
One is that particles are carried towards the
base of the cone by drag of the gas, which at
the wall has an axial component in the direc-
tion of the solids outlet [3]. The axial
Fig. 4. Typical plot of pressure reduction Al’, versus
component of gas velocity is, however, small
weight W of solids in the cyclone (0.5 - 0.6 mm sand
particles). Solid curve is a plot eqn. (7) fitted by least- in the vicinity of the wall, and is zero at the
squares. wall. Furthermore, in the cone, the particles
231
experience a centrifugal force which, when The data suggest that particle shape plays
resolved in directions parallel to and normal a significant role in the observed phenomena;
to the cone, has a component in the direction indeed in comparing results obtained with
opposite to the narrow end, and which would materials 6 and 9, which have similar mean
tend to counteract drag by the gas. This force particle size and density but have dissimilar
is, in fact, the most obvious reason for the shapes, it is seen that the parameters 71, To,
relatively long-term stability of the solids W(O)and q(O) all differ very significantly
inventory. in the two cases.
For these reasons, an alternative mecha- The rate of leakage of particles to the gas
nism is proposed, namely, that particles outlet is smallest with the smallest particles
circulating in the cone constitute a kind of (Table 2), and appears to reach a maximum
two-dimensional gas which ‘overflows’ into value at approximately 0.5 mm mean size
the dipleg when the concentration of particles with rounded, non-spherical particles. This
exceeds a maximum value. An estimate of result is consistent with the findings of Mori
the degree of coverage of the cone of the et al. [ 41, who observed that the efficiency of
cyclone by particles at the maximum value of their cyclone decreased with increasing size
W may be obtained using the following of particles, in the size range from 74 to 246
formula: pm. They attributed this phenomenon to
irregular bouncing of particles against the
(8) internal surfaces of the cyclone. The higher
leakage rate observed with glass spheres
where 17(O)equals the fraction of the surface may be due to the fact that they roll more
area of the cone occupied by particles at rapidly, due to their shape, and may therefore
W = WC"), and A, equals the area of the cone bounce further when they hit an imperfec-
of the cyclone. Equation (8) was derived by tion, such as a seam, in the wall of the
assuming that particles are spherical and that cyclone.
each particle occupies an area equal to its own The effect of q on AP, is illustrated in
projected area. Values of Q(O)expressed as a Fig. 5, since it may be shown that
percentage are given in Table 3 for various
d@r
-=_ 2ad,p,
sands and for glass spheres. These figures (9)
suggest that with rounded particles a surface dr) 34
coverage of a little over 5% is normal. The where rl equals the fractional surface coverage
figure for the spherical glass beads is larger, in the cone of the cyclone due to a mass W of
whereas with the very angular particles of trapped particles. The data in Fig. 5 thus
crushed sand (material 7) the figure is much show that in most cases, and over a broad
lower. The coverage is also somewhat smaller range of sizes, pressure drop reduction at the
for materials 1 and 6. limit of near zero solids is approximately
proportional to surface coverage. The propor-
tionality constant is significantly smaller for
the spherical glass beads, and is significantly
TABLE 3 larger for the irregular, angular crushed sand
Estimated maximum surface coverages in the cone of particles with average size 2.12 mm, and for
the cyclone the smallest particles. With the exception
of these three cases, the values of ap,i&,
No. Material (s,
r)(o) are confined to the span 2.4 X lo5 to 3.1 X
(mm) (%I lo5 Pa/m2 over a range of mean size from
0.22 to 1.09 mm.
Sand 0.22 2.7
Sand 0.29 5.5
Sand 0.38 5.0
Sand 0.46 5.2
Sand 0.55 5.3 CONCLUSIONS
Sand 1.09 2.7
Sand 2.12 1.4
Glass 1.13 7.5 The following physical phenomena were
observed:
232