Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maryhill College, Inc
Maryhill College, Inc
Maryhill College, Inc
A Research Paper
Presented to
Ms. Mariela C. Ayala
In Partial Fulfillment
For the Requirements In Inquiries, Investigation, and Immersion
Humanities and Social Sciences Program
Presented by:
Aragon, Jazelle Froyd
Atibo, Joana Mariel P.
Giron, Alyssandra Marian A.
Grade 12-Fortitude
January, 2021
1
THE PROBLEM
This chapter introduced the research problem and the theory which served as a
guide for the study. It also presented the research’s limitations and the benefits it may
contribute after the study has been conducted. Aside from these, important variables and
Introduction
Hypothesis
Theoretical Framework
2
F i g u r e 1 .
CHAPTER II
This chapter contained the various published literature and past studies of other
researchers related to this study. Specifically, this included a thorough explanation of the
variables such as Internet slang and writing habits for a better and clearer understanding
of the study. Results of the studies and literature in connection with how the Internet and
other digital technologies influence the way students write for their school paperwork
Related Literature
Related Studies
4
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presented and explained the methodology that the researchers
followed and utilized in conducting the study regarding the correlation of Internet slang
and writing habits of selected Grade 12 students in Maryhill College. This methodology
comprised the following: research design, research locale, research population and
sample, research instrument, data gathering procedure, and statistical treatment of data.
Research Design
Research Locale
specifically the Grade 12 students who are taking up the academic tracks or strands called
STEM, HUMSS, and ABM. They belong to the sections namely: Charity, Fidelity, and
Peace for STEM; Wisdom and Humility for ABM; and Justice, Piety, and Fortitude for
HUMSS.
5
Grade 12 students for the Academic Year 2020 – 2021 is 360. From this, 46 students (27
males and 19 females) belong to Charity. Both Fidelity and Peace have the same number
of students which is 45. However, in Fidelity, there are 23 males and 22 females. On the
other hand, Peace has 25 males and 20 females. Meanwhile, Wisdom has 39 students (12
males and 27 females) while Humility has 42 learners (12 males and 30 females). For
Justice, there are 46 students (19 males and 27 females) and for Piety, there are 47
learners (18 males and 29 females). Lastly, Fortitude is composed of 50 students (23
males and 27 females), which is the highest number of students in a particular section
In choosing the participants for this study, the researchers utilized the stratified
into subpopulations where the students were grouped according to their section and sex.
To determine the sample size or number of respondents for this study, the Slovin's
N
n=
1+ N e 2
n = 78.26 or 78
Thus, there would be a total of 78 respondents for this study. The number of
representatives from all of the Grade 12 Senior High School students was determined
through classifying the students in the population per section and sex.
Charity 6 4 10
Fidelity 5 5 10
Peace 6 4 10 Number of
Wisdom 2 6 8 Respondents
Humility 3 6 9
Justice 4 6 10
Piety 4 6 10
Fortitude 5 6 11
Total 35 43 78
Research Instrument
7
The questionnaire was divided into three parts. In the first part, the respondents
were required to write their section, age, and sex for their demographic profile. The
second part was about their use of Internet slang. For the third part, respondents were
asked about their writing habits, especially in writing papers for school.
In order to interpret the gathered data, various statistical treatments were applied
as follows:
f
P= × 100
N
8
f = frequency
and their writing habits for sub-problems no. 2 and 3 respectively, the weighted
WAM =
∑ fw
n
f = frequency
w = weights
The Likert scale was utilized in interpreting the results of the WAM with the
Internet slang and the writing habits of the respondents with the formula:
n ( ∑ xy )−( ∑ x ) ( ∑ y )
r=
√¿ ¿ ¿
To interpret the result for the coefficient of correlation, the following was used:
±1 Perfect
0 No Correlation