Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jeff Edited
Jeff Edited
Jeff Edited
Name of Student
Name of Professor
Name of Course
Date
Introduction
indicate that texting distracts a driver and slows his reaction by about 35%. On the other
hand, drinking alcohol lowers a driver’s reaction by 12%. Therefore, texting when driving is
more dangerous than drunk driving. Across the country, drunk driving is taken seriously
because of the risk it poses to other road users. Texting should also be treated with such
seriousness because it blurs the driver’s judgment and the inherent ability to react to
particular road conditions effectively. However, supporters of texting while driving has
always argued that they may be responding to different emergencies. This should not be the
case, as responding to an emergency puts other people at different types of risks. This paper
explains why texting while driving should be treated like drunk driving.
Texting takes a driver’s eyes off the road for a significant number of seconds. If a
driver texts five seconds to text when driving at 55 miles per second, he would cover
approximately 100 yards. The distance is large enough to cause an accident, especially on
busy highways. The five seconds a driver spends texting is more than enough to miss another
driver's signs in front of him (Farris 3). For example, a driver in front may abruptly hit the
brakes. If the driver was distracted by texting when the other driver gave indications that he
was about to hit a brake, an accident might occur. Alternatively, texting while driving may
distract a driver causing him to drift out of his lane in traffic. The results may be catastrophic
Surname 2
in such cases as he may end up hitting other vehicles. The prevention strategy for such a
Safe driving requires full attention. A lot of people are at risk when the driver gets
distracted for a moment. For example, a distraction near a children’s playfield may hit them
as they may not know that the driver is not paying attention. Texting takes over the driver's
attention, making him momentarily forget he is on the road and needs to ensure both his
safety and that of the other road users (Caird 312). When the driver is engaged in complex
conversations, his driving ability will be ultimately impaired, and his attention strained.
Drunk driving also impairs driving ability and judgment. As a result, texting while driving
and drunk driving have a similar effect on the driver's judgment. Therefore, texting when
Texting when driving often occurs as an impulse, and it is not always a driver’s
intention. Even though a driver might have been advised severally on the dangers of texting
when driving, the decision to text may sometimes be emotional. The decision can also be
automatic and subconscious. The driver may seem not to be in control as he knows he is not
supposed to be texting, yet he finds himself texting. Texting when driving is a psychological
example of human decisions' imperfections (Hayashi et al. 84). In this digital era, individuals
use their phones in almost every situation. The driver may subconsciously find himself using
the phone. Therefore, texting when driving should not be treated like drunk driving because
Conclusion
Texting when driving should be treated as drunk driving because they have similar
effects. They both pose dangers to other road users because they impair the driver’s
Surname 3
judgment. Texting when driving distracts the driver and makes him more responsive to the
traffic and other road events. Distraction is a leading cause of accidents. Even though texting
accidents.
Surname 4
Works Cited
Caird, Jeff K., et al. "A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving." Accident Analysis
(2011): 233.
Hayashi, Yusuke, Christopher T. Russo, and Oliver Wirth. "Texting while driving as
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Distracted driving/ electronic device use.
2020.