Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Jewish College Student
The Jewish College Student
Marissa Dordick
American colleges are constantly flooding with diverse groups of students. Oftentimes
assumptions about students’ background form and they tend to relate to race, prior experiences,
or simply what part of the country a student is coming from. Another indication of diversity that
may go unnoticed is religion. The U.S. college student has a plethora of views, values, and
understandings of the world they are a part of. One of the perceptions a student may have is
based on the belief system they uphold. Whether or not the student is religious, it is common for
a college student in the U.S. to identify in some way with a religious affiliation.
There is a possibility that students overlook the idea that religion plays a role in student
life on campus. There are resources and centers around campuses that serve specific identity
groups of students. The integration of students with differing religious beliefs on many campuses
is very common and seems to be easily accomplished (Kosmin & Keysar, 2015). This may
indicate a reason for Jewish resource centers not being widely present around campuses in the
U.S. Limited access to temples impact where Jewish students either attend school, or how they
experience and develop within an institution. Stereotypes can be used to understand how Jews
identify themselves within their environment. The purpose of this paper is to discuss campus life,
participation, and access to resources that affect the way Jewish college students experience
college and how they achieve their goals throughout their time on campus.
Identifying as a Jewish person has different meanings. There are varying levels of
Judaism including Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform. A student's level of religiosity and
identification can affect their experiences on the average U.S. campus. According to a survey
study conducted by Keysar and Kosmin (2014), 80% of college students believe that in the
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 3
United States, being Jewish just means that there is a cultural group to associate with (Keysar &
Kosmin, 2014). This indicates that for many college students, being Jewish plays a role in the
community on and around campus. Since community is a strong aspect of a student’s life, the
Jewish student may benefit from connecting with other Jewish students at their university.
Unfortunately, some institutions have faced anti-Semitism on campus, which can emit a hostile
environment for Jewish students. Some believe that Jews are the forgotten minority specifically
on college campuses (Bowman and Smedley, 2012). Being a Jewish student means that there are
less resources than some ethnic groups, but more resources than other religious groups on
campuses. It also means that experiences for Jewish students differ than that of non-Jewish
students giving Jewish students a possibly different outcome from their time in college.
look at where they came from compared to where they are now. Background and history is
important when creating on campus services for students of particular groups. History gives
insight as to what students may face today and what they need to overcome those obstacles set
It is well known that Jews have faced hardships in the past specifically in Europe. It is
fascinating that these difficulties have spilled over into American culture and college life. How
these ideas have spread in past years across the globe is crucial for comprehending what Jewish
college students are experiencing today on campuses across the country. With that said, Jewish
students still have issues related to the past treatment of Jewish people and the current state of
politics.
From a historical perspective, Jewish people have faced oppression for a long time.
Given that higher education was once centered around Christianity, many resources, studies, and
courses were meant for non-minority students. Higher education in the United States began in
the 17th century and according to an article by Alfred Jospe, support programs and education for
Jewish people in college were not considered until the 1920’s (Jospe, 1964). This indicates the
separation of minority students from more prominent religions because of the distinction
between the time higher education began and the introduction of Jewish assistance in college.
Another historical observation Lavender made is that many Jewish people in the early
20th century were of low economic status, but higher education seemed to be the tool in escaping
poverty (Lavender, 1977). The historical significance of this statement is that higher education
played a pressing role in many Jews being able to move up and out of poverty, therefore
indicating more Jewish students among institutions. Lavender also mentions Jews immigrating
into the United States at a time when higher education was expanding, which means that the
Jewish people either attended colleges simply because of easier access, or due to their customs
(Lavender, 1977). This conveys the consequences of timing and the historical nature of the
Jewish people. In the past, Jewish students have been viewed as outsiders in higher education
ranging from bias in the classroom and within admissions (Mayhew, Bowman, Rockenbach,
Selznick, & Riggers-Piehl, 2018). This further exclaims that Jewish students entering universities
As of the late nineteenth century, Jewish educators were established at some universities
and thus Jewish studies started becoming more accepted (Baskin, 2014). This marks a turning
point for Jews in higher education in the United States because they were seen as eligible to be
present on college campuses in the form of faculty and student populations. Baskin (2014) also
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 5
shares that, “... the establishment of positions in Semitic languages and literatures legitimized the
Jewish and Judaic presence in the American university at a time when being a Jew could
disqualify a candidate for an academic post” (p. 10). This reveals a snapshot of what being
Jewish meant before the expansion of higher education and its curriculum. It also indicates the
struggles that Jewish people who wanted to further their education dealt with and what they have
since overcome.
Stereotypes
Alongside history comes stereotypes based on experiences and events associated with
specific groups of people. There are stereotypes attached to being a Jewish person that persists to
this day that are evident in media and other outlets. A few relevant stereotypes are, Jewish people
have money or like money, they have big noses and curly hair, or are doctors and accountants.
Stereotypes can impact the way people who identify as the stereotyped group because they may
be more likely to be aware of them if they are living that stereotype and may even adapt a
different way of life in order to break expected roles and beliefs. For example, not attending
business or med school to not fall into the category of a Jewish doctor. It is evident how this can
widely determine how a Jewish student navigates through higher education. Since college is
typically a crucial time for self-development, internalizing stereotypes can lead to dissonance in
career aspirations.
The media plays a vital role in culture and can affect young Jews. Many celebrities have
become more open about their Jewishness leaving a space for others to feel accepted as a Jewish
person; however, these spaces have also left room for more jokes and even questions about
Judaism and identity especially for young adults. Hammerman discusses how celebrities have
internalized and embodied their vision of Jewishness. The link between Jewish comedians and
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 6
stereotypes is apparent in that they downplay the religion and hype up the stereotypes given to
them. For instance, Jewish effeminity by male comedians and Jewish women aggression from
female comedians are stereotypes about gender and Judaism that circulate the media
(Hammerman, 2017). These jokes not only reach Jewish students, they also reach non-Jewish
students, which fuels new ideas about Jewish people that are often negative; however, the goal of
the comedy may be to shine light on the stereotypes, which in turn can lay stereotypes to rest
when students recognize that their Jewish peers do not uphold them. Stereotypes have given new
names and ideas to Jewish culture and its people, but not all can be considered accurate.
Unfortunately, to this day, Jewish students at some universities are facing anti-sematic
harassment. With the rise in political propaganda in the U.S., Jews are continuing to be
antagonized across many spectrums. For example, there have been reports of anti-Sematic
protests on universities that impact a Jewish student’s ability to learn and engage with their
communities. An interesting and salient point to make here is that many anti-Sematic harassment
of Jewish students take place in the classroom or by non-Jewish peers on campus (Mayhew et al.,
2018). Although much of the hostile environment comes from other students, a study indicates
that ten percent of Jewish students claim that faculty have contributed to the problem (Saxe,
Sasson, Wright, & Hecht, 2015). Campus safety is much more than physicality. Students who
face these anti-Sematic and anti-Israel slurs may not feel mentally able to participate in courses
or with others on campus. Their religious freedom is therefore compromised and fear and stress
are induced. There are also indications that physical attacks are not as prominent as verbal ones,
but both do occur and impact the lives of Jewish students. The prior study poses an interesting
viewpoint about where the numbers come from when students share their experiences. The
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 7
connection that students have to their religion and to Israel can determine their perception of
hostility toward Jewish people (Saxe et al., 2015). The confrontations Jews face therefore relate
to how they are affected by the environment they are immersed in. What Saxe et al. is exhibiting
is a mere highlight of a risk in retention and persistence. Although some Jewish students may
persist – accomplish a goal – they may not be retained on campus. Retention in higher education
is students who continue to enroll in courses (Renn & Reason, 2013). If the environment a
campus is providing is hostile such as on with anti-Semitism, students of Jewish faith may be
more likely to leave or transfer lowering retention, or may not complete their degree decreasing
persistence.
More recently, there has been an addition of Jewish studies at universities. This is
important because it shows the changing and growing culture and acceptance of diverse groups
of people in the United States, specifically on college campuses. Given that in the past, educators
would not be hired based on religious affiliation, American education has come a long way
(Baskin, 2014). As it pertains to more recent campus culture, the fact that Jewish students can
attend college and have the opportunity to interact with faculty and staff of similar backgrounds
can strongly influence student success. Renn and Reason (2013) discuss how diversity on
campus comes in different forms. Whether those forms be race, gender, sexuality, religion, or
previously, Jews, among others, were, “excluded by law, policy, or practice” from colleges, but
the addition of diverse faculty, staff, students, and even coursework such as Jewish studies, has
“contributed significantly to changes in campus living and learning contexts” (Renn & Reason,
2013, p. 94). Recognizing Judaism in America’s higher education system is a monumental step
in abolishing the oppression Jews are still met with in today’s campus climate.
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 8
Part of participating in life events is possessing the sense of belonging. Some students
may be more likely to participate regardless of religious identity; however, others’ participation
on a college campus is determined by whether or not they feel like there is a space for them. To
further discuss Jewish participation is simply understanding the access to not only higher
education but access to schools that have what a Jewish student feels they need to succeed.
As a minority group, Jewish students are not as privileged as dominant groups; however,
they are in fact the most privileged of non-Christian groups (Goren, 2014). This relates to their
experiences on campus because they may not have access to what Christians do such as
churches; however, they are given more than non-Christian or non-Jewish students. For example,
resource centers and programs are available at some universities for minority students, which
puts Jews in a fascinating position. This exemplifies Jews being stuck in the middle of other
religious groups.
Another way in which Jewish students have more than other religions is through Greek
life. Some universities house Jewish fraternities and sororities such as AEPi, which is a fraternity
that reflects Jewish values and commitment (Why Go Greek?, 2017). However, going Greek
may exclude minority religions in social Greek fraternities and sororities. Including the idea of
Greek life being offered to Jewish students here aids in revealing the different aspects of Jewish
students’ ability to participate on campus. Further, Greek life may have a heavy influence on
some college students, so Jews having access to it is significant; however, they still may not get
As mentioned previously, Jews are underserved, but also privileged in other ways. One
way in which Jews are privileged in the United States is through race. Jews are often assumed to
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 9
be white, which gives them an advantage over other religious and racial minorities. Being a
white Jew is more widely accepted and visible, according to Zack, Michaelson, and Kivel not all
Jews are white. In fact, the majority of Jewish people in the world do not identify as western
European white, but are considered “close enough” in the United States to be treated with such
privilege (Zack, Michaelson, and Kivel, n.d., p. 4). This is just one way to explain how Jews are
faced with prejudice and discrimination in the United States. They are pushed aside as a minority
because of the way they look, which is unintentional discrimination in itself. On the other hand,
Jewish people and students may not experience the same set of issues as their peer minority
groups, in particular, people of color attending predominantly white institutions may face more
racism.
In addition, Mutakabbir and Nuriddin discuss further this idea of Christian privilege,
which they define as advantages given to students of Christian faith (Mutakabbir & Nuriddin,
2016). It is evident that many schools including elementary, high school, and colleges recognize
the catholic and Christian holidays such as Christmas and Easter. Mutakabbir and Nuriddin also
suggests that universities have biased school calendars, Monday through Friday work weeks,
menu options, and central worship locations on campus (Mutakabbir & Nuriddin, 2016). These
students have the privilege of not missing classes and being able to celebrate their faith; on the
other hand, non-Christian students do not receive the same treatment at most schools in the
United States. This lack of recognition for minority cultures are in line with Long’s (2016) idea
of cultural racism, which is described as viewing, “conformity to a single culture as both normal
and desirable” (p. 236). Christmas commercials and sales are normalized and desired in the
United States and disregards minority cultures. For instance, it is very unlikely to witness a
Hanukkah commercial or an advertisement recognizing the Jewish New Year (Rosh Hashanah).
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 10
Cultural racism can affect how students see themselves as part of a college community because
religious minority students may not attend school on their religious days, or they may not be
active within their religious community. They would in turn be expected to miss out on the
American college lifestyle if they are not given the opportunity to participate in campus activities
Participation and learning for Jewish students do not only occur on a college campus, but
applies to college aged adults on or off campus as well. Birthright is a program that allows
American Jews to travel to Israel and explore the country and Jewish religion. It is for people
ages 18-32, which encompasses the average age range of a college campus (Birthright Israel,
n.d.). This is crucial as it pertains to identity development because it offers a space for students
and young adults to engage in experiential learning. These trips can be initiated by campus
resources such as Hillel, which will be discussed later on. Literature on student involvement
emphasizes that by being involved outside of the classroom during the college years is likely to
Campus Resources
As part of a group that is well-known but not a majority comes with stipulations of what
is available to them. Campuses can impact all ethnic groups on campus by creating resources for
students to not only meet others like them, but to acknowledge student diversity. A previously
mentioned study by Mayhew et al. (2018) supports the idea that appreciation and acceptance of
Jewish people on campus comes from, “informal engagement with diverse peers, space for
support and spiritual expression, and provocative experiences with worldview diversity” (p. 84).
As a university, providing these spaces and interactions are seen as essential for all student
development.
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 11
A resource that many campuses possess is Hillel. Hillel is a place designed specifically
for Jewish students to interact and practice the religion on or near campus. Similar to church,
Hillel hosts services and religious events for Jewish students (Hillel International, 2019).
Unfortunately, there is not a Hillel located on or near every institution in the United States.
Although it is possible that not all colleges hold a large Jewish student population, this lack of
resources still exists. Not having access to a Hillel house can affect Jewish college students’
participation in the practice of their religion or even their college decision. It can also influence
their ability to succeed at an institution depending on their reliability on the Jewish faith. A study
conducted by Muhammad, Sapri and Sipan (2014) indicates that students believe, “... when the
building features and associated facilities provide a learning environment that meets students'
needs, it positively influences them and potentially improves their academic output or
performance” (p. 1175). This study provides evidence that buildings on campus strongly impacts
student success and further strengthens the purpose of a Hillel house for Jewish students.
When considering the resources offered for students, it is apparent that these resources
are meant to accommodate Jewish students. Accommodating students fosters growth in learning
through High-impact practices (HIP). High-impact practices are programs designed for students
to help them navigate and persist in college (Kuh, 2008). Research by Finley and McNair (2013)
shows that underserved students, “… who engage in high-impact practices demonstrate greater
gains in their first-year GPAs and a higher probability of first-to-second-year retention” (p. 2).
Jews, is critical of student development and success and students are more likely to stay at their
institution. The study indicates how accommodation through HIP reflects heavily on student
participation as well because HIP is an example of a resource students are welcome to participate
and engage in. Alluding back to resource accessibility, having groups and centers for students to
As stated previously, history is significant when looking at what is going on now and
what students need in order to persist to graduation. It is also crucial for the future of the students
in terms of individuals as they continue through life and for incoming Jewish college students.
The needs of Jewish students play a role in how higher education in the U.S. will evolve in the
future.
It was brought to attention earlier that Judaism is now being recognized more at
universities through Jewish studies programs. Although this is not a social way to consider
Jewish students. Jewish studies programs give students the opportunity to either learn more about
themselves, or for non-Jewish students to further their education about an unknown religion to
them. This is significant because it allows researchers to further their research about Jewish
students and how Judaism plays a role in peoples’ lives. This can then lead to more resources and
understanding of what these students need to accomplish their goals. An article discussing the
future of Jewish studies shares a dichotomous view of where studies for Judaism are going.
unhelpful ways for religious studies. The article states that at one time donations and funding
were strong, but they have recently begun to drop, leaving less opportunity for those studying
Judaism and other religious studies to obtain and uphold jobs as scholars (Levitt, 2014). This is
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 13
an issue for the future of Jews on college campuses because if students do not have the support
of Jewish faculty and staff, they may be less willing to be involved or they may struggle to find
their place. If students do not feel as though they belong, it is possible they may transfer, drop
out, or take longer to graduate. Although it is unknown as to why funding is limited, the overall
outcome of low funds can strikingly affect Jewish students and scholars later on.
Jewish studies have made a name for itself in higher education, but this is not the only
way to accommodate or reach Jewish students. One way that Jewish students can be pulled out
from the middle of majority and minority groups is for universities to recognize the Jewish
holidays across campuses. Alluding to the previous discussion related to Jews being a forgotten
minority, institutions may hold ceremonies for both majority and minority religions; however,
Jewish holidays often seem to be left out of this practice. By emphasizing all religions across
campus, Judaism may be more widely seen and accepted allowing Jewish students to feel a
In addition, campus resource centers that serve specific religions and offer mentorship
programs can assist Jewish students in finding their way around campus environments. Learning
communities is an example of a program that can bring students of similar backgrounds or faiths
together. Studies show that learning communities give students the opportunity to connect and
support peers similar to them who do not live in residence halls, which brought forth integration
and persistence for the students involved (Tinto, 1997, as cited in Renn & Reason, 2013). It is
evident that students of different cultural and religious backgrounds could benefit from groups
Conclusion
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 14
It is apparent that not all students have the same experiences in college. Students’
identities differ and are challenged in college. They are challenged by others and by their own
developmental beliefs. Depending on what their identity is, there are obstacles that may inhibit a
student from succeeding. These obstacles include the history of the student’s identity, the
There are many ways to define what being a Jewish student is. Given the different levels
of Judaism, the Jewish student is subject to multiple ways in which a university can affect them.
The history of Jews outside of the United States has impacted the ways in which Jewish students
have responded to higher education then and now. There are even incidents happening on
campuses today antagonizing Jews. Historical aspects of Jewish culture as well as roles has led
Having campus resources for Jewish students can reflect the participation of students.
Having resources and being able to join organizations with others like them leads to a sense of
belonging for these students. With that said, it is crucial that institutions accommodate students
who identify as Jewish by allowing them the space to express their religiosity.
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 15
References
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. Journal
Baskin, J. R. (2014). Jewish studies in North American colleges and universities: yesterday,
Birthright Israel: a free trip to Israel: Taglit - Birthright Israel. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14,
Bowman, N. A., & Smedley, C. T. (2013). The forgotten minority: examining religious
Finley, A., & McNair, T. (2013). Assessing underserved students’ engagement in High-Impact
Goren, S. (2014). Stuck in the middle with Jews: religious privilege and Jewish campus life.
Hammerman, S. (2017). Dirty Jews: Amy Schumer and other vulgar Jewesses. In Ross S., Renov
M., Brook V., & Ansell L. (Eds.), From Shtetl to Stardom: Jews and Hollywood (pp. 49-
Jospe, A. (1964). Jewish college students in the United States. The American Jewish Year Book,
65, 131–145.
Keyser, A., & Kosmin, B. A. (2014). Highlights demographic survey of American Jewish
college students 2014. The National Online Demographic Survey of American College
Students.
THE JEWISH COLLEGE STUDENT 16
Kosmin, B. A., & Keysar, A. (2015). National demographic survey of American Jewish college
Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from “high-impact educational practices: what they are, who has
Universities.
Lavender, A. D. (1977). Studies of Jewish college students: a review and a replication. Jewish
Long, A. (Ed.). (2016). Overcoming educational racism in the community college: Creating
pathways to success for minority and impoverished student populations. Sterling, VA:
Mayhew, M. J., Bowman, N. A., Rockenbach, A. N., Selznick, B., & Riggers-Piehl, T. (2018).
Muhammad, S., Sapri, M., & Sipan, I. (2014). Academic buildings and their influence on
1159–1178.
Saxe, L., Sasson, T., Wright, G., & Hecht, S. (2015). Antisemitism and the college campus:
Renn, K., & Reason, R., (2014). College students in the United States: Characteristics,
aepi/why-aepi/.
Zack, N., Michaelson, J., & Kivel, P. (n.d.). Jews and racial privilege. Retrieved November 20,