Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

J. SE Asian Appl. Geol., Jan–Jun 2009, Vol. 1(1), pp.

9-18

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF LOCAL SITE


CONDITON IN YOGYAKARTA BASIN

Tun Naing1 , Subagyo Pramumijoyo∗ 1 , and Hiroshi Kawase2


1 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2 Department of Architecture and Urban Design, Faculty of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University

Abstract 1 Introduction

The Yogyakarta Basin can be defined as NE – SW The local geologic and soil conditions have a
elongated depression zone of 20 km in width and great influence on the intensity of ground mo-
45 km in length, trending from Yogyakarta City in tion and earthquake damage. Local site effects
north to the Indian Ocean in south. The local ge- play an important role in earthquake-resistant
ologic and soil conditions have a great influence on design and must be accounted for on a case
the intensity of ground motion and earthquake dam- by case basis. Local site conditions can pro-
age. Local site effects play an important role in foundly influence all of the important charac-
earthquake-resistant design and must be accounted teristics such as amplitude (peak acceleration,
for on a case by case basis. Local site conditions can velocity and displacement), frequency content
profoundly influence all of the important character- and duration of strong ground motion. The ex-
istics such as amplitude (peak acceleration, velocity tent of their influence depends on the geometry
and displacement), frequency content and duration and material properties of subsurface materials.
of strong ground motion. The extent of their influ- Therefore, the analysis of site amplification
ence depends on the geometry and material proper- characteristics and evaluation of amplification
ties of subsurface materials. Therefore, subsurface factor in Yogyakarta Basin is primarily in need
investigation was carried out through nine boreholes to understand the expected strong ground mo-
throughout the basin. Based on drill-logs, collected tion during the future earthquakes and to min-
samples and laboratory test results, the subsurface imize the unexpected losses and damages in
soil profiles of nine areas in the basin are simplified future. Moreover, Yogyakarta and other pop-
for future strong ground motion simulation. Five ulated cities are located in this basin and so
subsurface layers in Tampuran, Krajan areas and the evaluation of effects of basin geometry on
six subsurface soil layers in Watu, Jl. Parangtri- strong ground motion is of great importance ei-
tis, Wijirejo areas and seven layers in Jl. Parangtri- ther.
tis, Karang Semut, Bambang Lipuro areas and eight
layers in Pranti area, have been simplified and the 2 Nature of Yogyakarta basin
geotechnical properties of each layer have been eval-
uated as well. The Yogyakarta Basin can be defined as NE-SW
Keywords: Basin, Yogyakarta, depression, ground elongated depression zone of 20 km in width
motion, earthquake. and 45 km in length from the Yogyakarta City
to the Indian Ocean as shown in Figure 1. The
basin was initiated by extrusions of two ma-
∗ Corresponding author: S. PRAMUMIJOYO, Depart- jor volcanic centers; Kulon Progo Mountain
ment of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, and Southern Mountain, during Cenozoic and
Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Grafika 2 Yogyakarta, 55281, was formed as a volcano-tectonic depression
Indonesia. E-mail: bagyo@ugm.ac.id

9
NAING et al.

since the Oligo-Miocene or earlier (Lucus et al., Old Merapi Volcanics Around the upper
2007). The regional gravity data suggest that cone of Gunung Merapi, strongly fractured
the Yogyakarta Basin can be divided into sev- basalt and andesite lavas with indurated brec-
eral zones (Lucus et al., 2007). The first zone cias occur and are deposits of Upper Pleis-
is in north of Yogyakarta City with the low- tocene Merapi volcanism. The buried extension
est gravity anomaly and is spatially associated of these deposits does not extend far south as
with active Merapi volcano. Second is the mod- a deep bore hole in Yogyakarta has penetrated
erate gravity anomaly region locating at the through the Post-Pleistocene deposits directly
south and east of Yogyakarta City. The third is into the Tertiary strata.
the high gravity anomaly locating as two sep-
arate clusters to the west and southeast of Yo- Young Merapi Volcanics The materials
gyakarta City. ejected from Merapi since the Major explo-
According to gravity data, it is important to sion which is thought to have taken place in
note that the famous Opak Fault is not actually 1006 AD are considered as the Younger Mer-
located at the eastern margin of the Yogyakarta api Volcanics. These predominantly consist of
Basin and the direction of Opak Fault which andesite lavas and tuffs. They outcrop in the
is aligned with the current topography is not vicinity of cone of Merapi.
aligned with the gravity trend.
Sleman Formation The Sleman formation
3 General geology has been designated as the lower part of a
major volcaniclastic unit which was formerly
Volcanic rocks and their derivatives dominate included in the Younger Merapi Volcanics (Van
the studied Yogyakarta Basin. The geology of Bemmelen, 1949). The formation extends from
Yogyakarta Basin is shown in Figure 2. The ex- upper Merapi slope to the south of Bantul.
tensive deposits of alluvium derived from Gu- In the north, on the Merapi Upper Slope, it
nung Merapi ejector mainly occur in this basin. consists of sand and gravels with interspersed
In the eastern part, Miocene limestone is abun- boulders, all derived from volcanic ejector.
dantly outcropped throughout the Wonosari From Yogyakarta to south, the formation is
and Gunung Sewu which are parts of Kabu- overlain by Yogyakarta Formation and so the
paten Kidul. In Gunung Sewu, the typical karst full thickness of Sleman Formation can be
topography which is developed under humid identified in the bore holes. This formation
tropical climate can be observed well. is thought to be Upper Pleistocene to Holocene
The rocks and sediments in this basin range in age and the thickness is variable.
in age from the Eocene to the Holocene.
Throughout this period, continuous orogenic Yogyakarta Formation It forms the surface
instability had resulted in significant faulting outcrop throughout the lowland area of Yo-
and volcanism which effected markly upon gyakarta Basin from Merapi Middle Slope to
the geomorphic and geologic evolution of the the coast. The formation consists of an in-
basin. terbedded sequence of sand, gravels, silts and
clay. The amount of clay increases southwards.
Yogyakarta Basin Quaternary Succession However, the layers of coarse materials have
The quaternary succession is dominated by vol- been encountered throughout the basin. Thick-
canic activities, largely attributable to Gunung ness of this formation is variable and up to 45
Merapi. Other important deposits such as lit- m in some places. This formation lies uncon-
toral clay deposits in the vicinity of Wates, mi- formable upon the Sleman Formation.
nor valley and terrace alluvia in the main river
valleys, deflation materials on limestone and Wates Formation This formation occurs in the
sand dunes adjacent to the coast have also been lower Kali Serang forming a lowland triangle
encountered (MacDonald M. et al., 1984). between Seragater, Pengasih, and Plempukan.

10 c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University



PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF LOCAL SITE CONDITON IN YOGYAKARTA BASIN

Figure 1: Location of Yogyakarta basin

Figure 2: General geological map of Yogyakarta basin

c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University


11
NAING et al.

It has also been observed in south of Bantul, been classified in Watu area: (1) Grayish brown
on the coastal alluvial plain. This formation in- to brown sand mixed with silt, (2) Light brown
cludes the littoral deposits of silts and clay de- to dark gray fine sand mixed with clay silt,
rived from weathering products of the Sentolo medium to high plasticity, (3) Light brown to
Hills and the West Progo Mountains. Above brown silty fine sand, medium plasticity, (4)
the littoral sequence, the fluvial deposits which Blackish gray clay, high plasticity, (5) Greenish
mainly contain clays with sand lens in the up- brown, reddish brown, compact breccia, and (6)
per section have been occurred. Blackish brown, fine-grained sandstone. The
On the coastal plain south of Bantul, littoral geotechnical properties of each layer have been
sands and gravels are allocated to the Wates described in the Table 1.
Formation. These deposits are believed to be The borehole No. 2 is located in Tempuran,
reworked materials from the Yogyakarta For- near Opak River. It was drilled just up to 26 m
mation. The age of this formation is Middle since bedrock had been encountered starting at
Holocene and the thickness is variable, 20 m to 13 m. The groundwater table in this area is very
30 m. shallow and observed at 2.5 m depth. Fine to
medium uniform sand had been observed up to
Coastal Sand Dunes Fine to coarse grained 12 m. This zone is very loose (N<20) and so the
sands are mainly present as dunes along the high amplification can be expected in this zone.
coast from Kali Bogowonto to the Kali Opak. This zone is underlain by 1 m thick clay layer.
The dimensions of sand dunes are up to 1.5 km The bedrock, breccia, was encountered starting
in width and up to about 40 m in thickness. from 13 m.
They are overlying on Wates and Yogyakarta Based on drilling log, collected samples and
Formations. They may be Upper Holocene in laboratory test results, the soil profile at Tempu-
age. ran area can be differentiated into 5 layers: (1)
Brown, fine clayey sand with few andesite grav-
4 Geotechnical investigation els, (2) Brownish gray to blackish gray medium
to coarse sand mixed with silts, (3) Brown-
The detailed drilling program had been carried ish gray to blackish gray fine clayey sand, (4)
out for subsurface investigation in Yogyakarta Greenish gray, slight compact clay of high plas-
Basin. There are nine boreholes throughout the ticity, and (5) Yellowish brown, grayish brown,
basin especially in Bantul area to evaluate the with andesite and sandstone fragments, com-
geotechnical properties of subsurface soil lay- pact and hard. The geotechnical parameters of
ers as shown in Figure 3. The boreholes were each layer are described in the Table 2.
generally drilled up to the bedrock. The depths The borehole No. 3 is in Pranti, Pundong,
are varying from 20 m to 50 m. Bantul and drilled up to 40 m depth. The
The borehole No. 1 is located in Watu, Pun- groundwater table was encountered at the
done, Bantul area and drilled up to 35 m. The depth of 14.6 m. It is an area of thick sand
groundwater table was at surface. Medium to deposit. Bedrock is encountered after 30 m
gravelly coarse sand are mainly observed in up- depth and which is overlain by sand deposit
per 1 m and silt to fine sand are dominated from with different layers. This is an area of thick
1 m to 20 m depth. This portion will be a ma- unconsolidated sediment, and so high ampli-
jor zone for the consideration of ground motion fication and strong ground motion during an
and amplification. This zone is underlain by 1 earthquake can be expected in this area.
m thick clay layer. The bedrock, breccia, is en- The subsurface soil profile of this area has
countered starting from 22 m to 30 m. Black- be divided into 8 layers based on drill log, col-
ish brown, fine-grained, hard sandstone is ob- lected samples: (1) Black clay with high plastic-
served after 30 m dept. ity, (2) Fine sands with silts with medium plas-
Based on drilled log, collected samples and ticity, (3) Dark brown to black clay with high
laboratory test results, 6 subsurface layers have plasticity, (4) Silt with high plasticity, (5) Brown

12 c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University



PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF LOCAL SITE CONDITON IN YOGYAKARTA BASIN

Figure 3: Location of Boreholes in Yogyakarta Basin

fine sands mixed with silts and clay, (6) Brown- Parangtritis, Yogyakarta. It was drilled only
ish gray sand mixed with clays and gravels, (7) up to 20 m depth, not reached to bedrock.
Black clay with high plasticity, and (8) Green- The groundwater table was found at 5.7 m.
ish brown, compacted breccia. The laboratory This area is mainly composed of sandy deposit
test data and the geotechnical properties of each which is mixed with silt and gravel. According
layer are described in the Table 3. to SPT results, this is an area of medium dense
The borehole No. 4 is located on Jl. Parangtri- sediments. Based on drill log and collected core
tis, Yogyakarta. It was drilled up to 30 m but samples, this area is divided into seven layers:
did not reach bedrock. The upper 7 m is mainly (1) Grayish brown sand mixed with fines with
composed of medium to coarse sand. Fine medium plasticity, (2) Medium to coarse, gray
sand becomes more dominant after 7 m depth sand mixed with andesite gravels, (3) Light
with two clay layers at 21 m depth and 23 m brown to grayish brown fine sand mixed with
depth. The groundwater table was observed silt, with medium plasticity, (4) Grayish brown,
at 5.5 m depth. The subsurface soil profile of fine to medium grain sandstone, (5) Brownish
this area can be classified 6 layers: (1) Brownish gray to gray medium grain, uniform sand with
to blackish gray uniform, medium grain sand few fines, (6) Silt with medium plasticity, and
with fines and gravels, (2) Fine sand with silts, (7) Gray medium grain, uniform sand. Some
medium plasticity, (3) Brownish gray, uniform, geotechnical properties of each layer are sum-
medium grained sand with gravels, (4) Brown marized in the Table 5.
fine sand mixed with silt, clay, medium plas- The borehole No. 6 is in Karang Semut, Imo-
ticity, (5) Grayish clay, high plasticity, and (6) giri, Bantul. It was drilled up to only 20 m depth
Sandstone, underlain by gravelly fine sand. The as bedrock, sandstones, are encountered at 14
available geotechnical properties for each layer m. The groundwater table was observed at 8.5
are summarized in the Table 4. m depth. The upper 4 m is mainly composed
The borehole No. 5 is also located in Jl. of fine to medium sand and two sandstone lay-

c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University


13
NAING et al.

ers are observed at depth 4.5 m and 7.5 m. The Black clay of high plasticity, and (7) Breccia and
clay layer, 2 m thick, is found at 12 m depth and sandstones intercalated with sand layers. Some
which is overlying on sandstone bedrock. geotechnical properties of each subsurface layer
Based on drill log and collected samples, the of this area are described in the Table 8.
soil profile of this area can be differentiated into The borehole No. 9 is in Wijirejo, Pandak,
seven layers: (1) Brown to brownish gray sand, Bantul area. It was drilled up to 47 m depth.
mixed with fines and gravels, (2) Brown, fine The bedrock is encountered at 19 m depth and
grained sandstone, (3) Brown sand mixed with overlain by moderately dense sandy deposit of
silts, medium plasticity, (4) Brown, fine grained different grain sizes. The groundwater table is
sandstone, (5) Brown to blackish gray sand, very shallow and observed at 2 m depth. The
mixed with silts and gravel, medium plastic- subsurface profile of this area is divided into
ity, (6) Black clay with high plasticity, and (7) 6 layers based on drill log and collected sam-
Brown, fine grained sandstone. The geotechni- ples: (1) Grayish brown to gray sand mixed
cal properties of each layer are described in the with clays, (2) Gray medium to coarse sand,
Table 6. (3) Greenish brown, high plasticity clay, (4)
The borehole No. 7 is located in Krajan, Pon- Gray medium grained sand mixed with grav-
cosari, Bantul. It was drilled up to 47 m depth. els, (5) Black, high plasticity clay, and (6) Brown
This area is mainly dominated by thick sandy to blackish brown fine-grained sandstones, in-
deposit of various grain sizes. The bedrock is tercalated with clay and mudstones. Some
encountered at 30 m depth and the groundwa- geotechnical properties of each layer are sum-
ter table in this area is very shallow and found marized in the Table 9.
at 1.70 m depth. Based on drill log and col-
lected samples, the subsurface soil profile in 5 Discussion
this area can be classified into 5 layers: (1)
Brownish gray, medium sand with some fines, In this study, the subsurface soil profiles and
(2) Blackish gray, coarse sand with no fines, (3) soil types are determined according to United
Brownish gray to gray, coarse sand mixed with State Soil Classification (USCS) system, based
gravels and fines, (4) Brownish gray to gray, on grained size analysis, Atterberg’s Limits Test
fine to medium sand mixed with silts, and (5) and drill logs. The shear strength parameters
Brown, fine grained sandstone. Some geotech- are obtained from direct shear test and tri-axial
nical properties of each layer are described in test. The water content, void ratio and specific
the Table 7. gravity for each layer also determined. These
The borehole No. 8 is located in Bambang subsurface profiles and properties are funda-
Lipuro, Bantul and drilled up to 50 m depth. mental input parameters for ground response
The groundwater table is shallow and observed analyses.
at 2 m depth. This is an area of sand, silts and Loose to medium dense sand, silt and clay
clay deposit up to 26 m. Breccia is observed sediments are mainly dominant in most areas
at 26 m depth and up to 35 m. After 35 m, and the shallow groundwater table is observed
sand layer, breccia and fine grained sandstone in most of areas. Therefore, the amplification
layers are alternated up to 45 m depth. Fine of seismic waves can be expected into a certain
grained sandstone layer is encountered from 45 level. The clayey and silty sand layers are en-
m to 50 m, end of borehole. The subsurface pro- countered up to 30 m depth in Watu, Tampuran
file of this area has been classified into 8 lay- and Pranti areas. The high amplification and
ers: (1) Brownish gray to gray, fine to medium strong ground motion can occur in these areas.
sand, (2) Greenish gray, fine sand mixed with Well graded and poorly graded sand layers and
silts, medium plasticity, (3) Blackish brown to silty sand layers dominate In Jl. Parantritis and
gray sand mixed with fines, (4) Brown clay this area can be regarded as a dangerous area of
of high plasticity, (5) Greenish gray to black- earthquake related settlement.
ish gray sand mixed with silts and gravels, (6) In Karang Semut area, two hard sandstone

14 c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University



PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF LOCAL SITE CONDITON IN YOGYAKARTA BASIN

c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University


15
NAING et al.

16 c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University



PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF LOCAL SITE CONDITON IN YOGYAKARTA BASIN

layers are sandwiched between clayey and silty 6 Conclusions


sand layers at 4.5 m and 7.5 m depths. The dif-
ferent impedance ratio will cause trapping all In this study, the site condition is evaluated
seismic waves in soil layers and more cycles of mainly based on geotechnical evaluation in
dynamic loading can be expected. Silty sand nine areas in Yogyakarta Basin through bore-
and poorly graded sand layers are mainly ob- hole logs, results from direct shear test, tri-axial
served in Krajan area. This area can occur liq- test, Atterberg’s Limits test, and determination
uefaction problems during an earthquake due of specific gravity, water content, degree of sat-
to sediment types and shallow groundwater ta- uration, density and void ratio. As a result, the
ble. following facts are concluded.
In Bambang Lipuro and Wijirejo areas, two 1. The subsurface soil profiles and related
high plasticity clay layers are encountered geotechnical parameters have been evalu-
among sandy layers. The shallow groundwater ated in nine areas for determination strong
table, at 2 m depth, and these clay layers can ground motion and ground response anal-
cause high pore-water pressure in sandy layers yses.
during an earthquake and strong motion and 2. The shear strength parameters, standard
settlement problems can be expected. More- penetration test results, void ratio and
over, the high plasticity clay layer is usually other basic geotechnical parameters have
observed as base layer of all soil layers in all been determined for the estimation of
area. This clay layer is very weak (N<13) and shear wave velocity structures of the basin.
will generate strong motion to the overlying Shear wave velocity structure is very fun-
soil layers. damental in seismic response analysis.
The soil layers are underlain by hard sand-
3. Loose to medium dense sediments are
stone or breccia layer at generally at 30 m,
dominant in most studied areas and which
in all studied areas. In such situation, the
are underlain by hard sandstone or breccia
hard sandstone or breccia acts as a fixed end
layer generally at 30 m depth, as engineer-
and any downward-traveling waves in soil lay-
ing bedrock.
ers will be completely reflected back towards
the ground surface when they reach soil-rock However, there are some limitations in this
boundary. Therefore, all seismic wave energy study. The additional drilling program is re-
is trapped within the soil layers and strong quired to create the basin model. More tri-axial
ground motion can be occurred in the Yo- test results are also needed to determine the ini-
gyakarta Basin. tial shear stress and shear strength of soil layers.

Acknowledgement

Sincere gratitude is directed to Geological En-


gineering Department, UGM and Japan Inter-

c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University


17
NAING et al.

national Co-operation Agency (JICA) for their Das B. M. (1993) Principles of Soil Dynamics,
supports in every academic affair. The great PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston, Mas-
debt of gratitude is to my advisor Dr. Subagyo sachusetts.
Pramumijoyo for his guidance and suggestions. Kramer, S.L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engi-
neering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
The acknowledgement is extended to Professor
Lucas, D. S. et al. (2007) Searching for the Active
Dr. Hiroshi Kawase for his empowerment and fault of Yogyakarta Earthquake 2006: current in-
advices. terpretation based on the reconstruction of Ceno-
zoic Geo-history, Geological Engineering Depart-
ment, UGM, Indonesia.
References McDonald M. et al. (1984) Greater Yogyakarta
Groundwater Resources Study, volume 3, Min-
Craig R. F. (1991) Soil Mechanics, CHAPMAN & istry of Public Work, Indonesia.
HALL, 2-6 Boundary Row, London SE1 8HN.

18 c 2009 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University

You might also like