Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moving Beyond Motion Metaphors For Changing Sound
Moving Beyond Motion Metaphors For Changing Sound
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557498?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and Royal Musical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Journal of the Royal Musical Association
I am indebted to Arnie Cox, Eric Clarke and two anonymous readers for const
and encouragement in relation to earlier versions of this article. I am particularly
Cox for providing me with a copy of his thesis, 'The Metaphoric Logic of Mu
Space' (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon, 1999).
1 Robert Adlington, 'Musical Temporality: Perspectives from Adorno and De
sions, 6 (1997), 5-60. Such thinkers include Hegel and Marx, as well as Adorno
2 Recent studies of musical motion include Eric Clarke, 'Meaning and the S
Motion in Music', Musicae scientiae, 5 (2001), 213-34; Thomas Clifton, Music as H
Applied Phenomenology (New Haven, CT, 1983), esp. Chapters 4 and 5; Cox, 'The M
of Musical Motion and Space'; Naomi Cumming, 'Metaphors of Space and Moti
Analysis of Melody', Miscellanea musicologica, 17 (1990), 143-66; David Epstein
Music, the Brain, and Performance (New York, 1995); Christopher F. Hasty, 'Rhyt
Music: Preliminary Questions of Duration and Motion', Journal of Music Th
183-216; Judy Lochhead, 'The Metaphor of Musical Motion: Is There an Alternativ
Practice, 14/15 (1989-90), 83-103; Bruno R. Repp, 'Music as Motion: A Synopsi
Truslit's "Gestaltung und Bewegung in der Musik" (1938)', Psychology of Music
Patrick Shove and Bruno R. Repp, 'Musical Motion and Performance: Theoretic
Perspectives', The Practice of Performance: Studies in Musical Interpretation,
(Cambridge, 1995), 55-83; Neil Todd, 'Music and Motion: A Personal View', Pro
Fourth Rhythm Workshop: Rhythm Perception and Production, ed. Catherine Auxiett
and Claire Gerard (Bourges, 1992), 123-8.
3 Wallace Berry, Structural Functions in Music (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976), 8.
Motion is the very stuff of time itself. To speak of time is virtually to speak
of motion, for motion is time's intrinsic correlate. We live, and conse-
quently move, within time and through time ... Motion is basically under-
stood by using time as its index ... The reverse of that correlation is equally
true: time is only experienced, and thus understood, through motion.
Motion is thus the quintessential property of time.11
10 David Epstein, Beyond Orpheus: Studies in Musical Structure (Cambridge, MA, 1979), 55.
11 Epstein, Shaping Time, 8.
12 Ibid., 5, 26. For a similar view, see Barbara Barry, Musical Time: The Sense of Order (New York,
1990).
13 Epstein, Shaping Time, 487.
14 Stimulating contributions to these debates include Arthur N. Prior, 'Changes in Events and
Changes in Things' (1968), The Philosophy of Time, ed. Robin Le Poidevin and Murray
MacBeath(Oxford, 1993), 35-46; Keith Seddon, Time: A Philosophical Treatment (London, 1987);
G. J. Whitrow, Time in History (Oxford, 1988), Chapter 1.
15 I elaborate briefly on the mechanics of this influence in the third section of this article. I will
not enter directly into the question of the existence of a 'natural' time; I do not believe that my
larger argument, which is intended to throw into question common-sense time, is irreconcilable
with belief in such a thing.
16 It follows that I do not view change as being dependent on time.
Clarinets and bassoons open the piece with a gentle twining figure (bars
1-4). Theft ' of the cor anglais (bar 5) sets up a tension that is released only
very gradually, with the bat bar 7. The music's tension is not fully expunged,
however, for the first string chord itself contains an implied dissonance (the
G, which wants to resolve to an F#), and tension is further increased by the
as 'metaphor theory'. I
theorists have influenc
fields to an extent tha
made somewhat difficult.19 Nevertheless, the work of Lakoff and
Johnson in particular presents a crisply articulated view of the relation
of words to experience, which may readily be applied to the domain of
music - and which is, indeed, frequently cited in existing work on
musical metaphor. Although this work is now relatively widely known,
a concise synopsis of its basic contentions will prove useful for my
longer-term argument.
Rather than conceive of metaphor as a relatively insignificant aspect
of language, metaphor theory has been concerned to demonstrate the
extent to which it permeates ordinary speech and thought. Statements
such as 'it's hard to get that idea across to him', 'it's difficult to put my
ideas into words' and 'the idea is buried in terribly dense paragraphs',
for instance, are all dependent on metaphor (the metaphorical
components are italicized; all of them attribute an 'idea' with meta-
phorical properties drawn from the physical world).20 As Janna Saslaw
has pointed out, 'When we make statements like these, we have the
sense that we are being quite literal. ... Metaphorical expressions like
these are used unconsciously. When we use them, we don't usually
think about the structure of the concepts.'21 This characteristic of
everyday language has led metaphor theorists to conclude that
metaphor is not simply a feature of verbal descriptions, but is actually
fundamental to the way in which we experience the world. As George
Lakoff puts it, 'The locus of metaphor is not in language at all, but in
the way we conceptualize one mental domain in terms of another....
Metaphor is fundamentally conceptual, not linguistic in nature.'22
This contention revolves around the idea that understanding is
dependent on recurring patterns of experience, which are projected
from one domain of knowledge to another. Specifically, the point of
conceptual metaphors is to achieve a firmer grasp of relatively
unfamiliar or abstract phenomena by employing patterns of experi-
ence - often referred to as 'image schemas' - drawn from more
familiar, concrete domains. The principal source of these schemas is
our most immediate bodily experience: for instance, 'our bodily move-
ments through space, our manipulations of objects, and our percep-
tual interactions'.23 Thus, in the everyday metaphorical expressions
19 For instance, metaphor theory intersects in important ways with recent writings on the
evolution of the 'embodied mind'. See Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch,
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (Cambridge, MA, 1991), and Antonio
R. Damasio, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York, 1994). Mark
Johnson's recent work has incorporated insights on metaphor into the broader field of concep-
tual blending; see Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner, The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and
the Mind's Hidden Complexities (New York, 2002).
20 These examples, taken from Lakoff and Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, are cited in Saslaw,
'Forces, Containers, and Paths', 221.
21 Ibid.
22 Lakoff, 'The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor', 203, 244.
23 Johnson, The Body in the Mind, 29.
30 Lakoff andJohnson, Philosophy in the Flesh, 138. Compare Whitrow: 'Time certainly is a funda-
mental characteristic of human experience, but there is no evidence that we have a special sense
of time, as we have of sight, hearing, touch, taste, or smell. Our direct experience of time is always
of the present, and our idea of time comes from reflecting on this experience' (Time in History,
4-5).
31 Johnson, The Body in the Mind, 117.
32 Lakoff and Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh, 180.
33 Ibid., 176.
34 Ibid., 183ff.
35 Lakoff, 'The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor', 224-5.
36 Johnson, The Body in the Mind, 54.
37 Ibid., 114.
38 Saslaw, 'Forces, Containers, and Paths', 220.
39 Lakoff and Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh, 141, 145. These correspond to what Judy
Lochhead ('The Metaphor of Musical Motion', 103) describes as 'dynamic' and 'static' time
respectively. Lochhead's discussion of the idea of 'static' time rather neglects the fact that, in this
conception of time, the observer moves, even though time does not. I will not dwell on the contra-
diction that Lakoff andJohnson perceive between the two models, as both possess similar qualities
of motion, and it is these qualities, rather than the question of precisely what is moving, that are
my main interest.
II
44 Cox, 'The Metaphoric Logic of Musical Motion and Space', 267. Cox's argument is elabor-
ated at length in Chapter 4 of his dissertation ('Temporal Motion and Musical Motion').
45 Ibid., 207.
46 Ibid., 214.
47 Ibid., 268.
particularly appropr
strings in bar 14 mig
other source domain
motional one. The cha
to motivate a concept
than it does one of fl
a 'weight' schema com
'fullness' schema that
turn eventually supe
14. The experience o
words, is not domina
path-like motion -
motion and others gr
creating a sort of kal
Of course, non-moti
existing descriptions
ing' or 'softening'; as
become more 'weight
disc recording of Tch
moments of the pie
void', undergo 'viol
'collapse' and 'darken
experiencing) musica
logical writings some
izations of music are
ongoing motion, rat
ations.50 For instance
musicological texts as m
cally seen as implicat
potentially wholly au
might be said of Lako
ence. In the course of
motional domains t
conceptualizing cha
('growing anger is in
heat'), emptiness and
cality ('happier is u
hunger'; 'acquiring
('overcoming proble
('greater understanding is
change is evolution').52 Yet
temporal events per se, t
squarely to path-like motion
One of the reasons for thi
that change of any sort i
argument runs somethin
conceptualized as 'increas
schema), the increasing hea
movement from one moment of heat to the next moment of even
greater heat. Similarly, this argument would state that the grow
'pressure' of each of the crescendos in bars 17-20 of Nuages is acc
panied by a sense of motion from moment to moment as the pres
increases. In other words, as stated before, under this argum
motion is implicit in the very notion of change.
But why should this be so? After all, the conceptualization of ch
as motion is purely metaphorical - as Lakoff and Johnson themse
strongly assert. It is an effective metaphor, frequently used in respon
to the need to find a physical correlate to the relatively abstract noti
of 'change'. But if an alternative physical correlate suggests itself
particular type of changing experience - increasing pressure,
instance - the requirements of cognitive metaphor are already f
satisfied: an abstract notion is grasped using an appropriate metap
To insist that this experience of increasing heat is additionally acc
panied by a sense of motion is to impose a second-level meta
where one is not needed. We all have a ready knowledge of the fe
of increasing pressure; it is an immediate, physical experience th
requires no additional metaphorical overlay. One may choose
identify the successive moments of increasing heat with sp
movement, but it is hardly a requirement to do so in order to grasp t
nature of the experience. And of course, as the arguments of meta
theory clearly imply, there is no 'truth' about temporal experience th
requires to be identified as motion, for motion is merely a conve
metaphor for the experience of change.53
Something of what I am trying to argue here may be crystalliz
I return to bar 14 of Nuages. I stated earlier that this was the
52 I have adapted metaphors discussed by Lakoff and Johnson in the following places: L
and Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, 14, 51, 143; Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things,
396, 406, 409; Lakoff and Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh, 207, 545, 560-1.
53 The idea that motion is a literal property of changing existence tends to be reinfor
our vocabulary: our favoured words for identifying different moments in a changing event -
included - are often locational and linear. Thus we talk about one moment 'following' ano
say that something happened 'in between' other things; refer to parts of temporal even
'passages'; and so on. Metaphor theorists take such words as indication of our inherentl
tional and motional experience of change. But, as the present argument is intended to su
this descriptive bias reflects a long-lived cultural reluctance to countenance change reflectiv
a non-motional way (say, in terms of varying weight or heat, rather than in terms of varying sp
locations) as much as it reflects any actual property of changing experience. (Reasons f
prominence of motional metaphors in descriptions of music, specifically, are offered in the
section.) Non-motional metaphors have to fight for prominence, as it were, alongside the ha
motional ones. It is at this point that I have to depart somewhat from the assumption under
ing metaphor theory, namely that descriptions invariably give a sound indication of mo
experience.
(a) (b)
Figure 1. Two
Nuages.
III
With the establishment of clocks as the embodiment of time, it was not long
before the experienced essence of clocks (uniform motion) became
metonymically the experienced essence of time itself. Time became
medium in uniform motion. ... The clock became not simply the measure
of time but its canonic exemplification.57
returning'.58 In seekin
certain metaphors - b
make reference to what Lakoff and Turner have called 'the invariance
hypothesis'.59 This states that metaphorical mappings, far from bein
arbitrary, are constrained by the 'schematic structure' of the phenom
enon for which a metaphor is sought. If a metaphor is to seem apt an
to avoid dissonance with the thing it describes, the skeletal image-
schema of that thing must not be violated by the metaphor.60 Path-like
motion is appropriate as a metaphor for tonal relations because it is
consistent with the basic structure of those relations. This structure
comprises an ordered sequence of essentially discrete musical 'objec
(harmonies) that may readily be perceived as distinct features of t
passing surroundings - marking out, as it were, the ongoing journey
Additionally, tonal relations permit a measure of accurate anticipati
of future events; these events can then be conceptualized as 'lyi
ahead', as 'approaching' (or being approached), and as 'arriving'
being arrived at). Susan McClary has commented on the appropriat
ness of tonality's evocation of 'progress' and 'quests after goals' to t
ideologies of the culture in which it first flourished.61 She poin
particularly to the fondness of composers for delaying decisi
moments of 'arrival' - namely, structural cadences - as a way of dram
tizing the journey on which the listener has embarked.
The failure of parts of the post-tonal repertory to motivate
comparable impressions of motion has been a frequent source of cri
cism.62 There are, of course, identifiable structural reasons why th
music fails to support metaphors of paths and goals. For instan
expectations in post-tonal music tend to lack specificity; identifiabl
locatable goals are replaced by more indeterminate, generalized pos
bilities of continuation. The musical past is often similarly fluid a
unenduring, as opposed to the ordered sequence that we like t
believe is inscribed into memory by tonal harmony.63 The relative
58 Saslaw, 'Forces, Containers, and Paths', 229. At least, path metaphors predominate
descriptions of the heard effect of music in which these relations occur. When tonal relations
conceptualized more abstractly, metaphors of hierarchy are often preferred; see Lawrence
Zbikowski, 'Conceptual Models and Cross-Domain Mapping: New Perspectives on Theorie
Music and Hierarchy', Journal of Music Theory, 41 (1997), 193-225.
59 For a summary of this notion see Turner, 'Aspects of the Invariance Hypothesis'.
60 Ibid., 251.
61 Susan McClary, Conventional Wisdom: The Content of Musical Form (Berkeley, 2000); see esp.
pp. 66-8.
62 See, for instance, George Rochberg, 'The Structure of Time in Music: Traditional and
Contemporary Ramifications and Consequences', The Aesthetics of Survival: A Composer's View of
Twentieth-Century Music (Ann Arbor, 1984), 137-47; Barry, Musical Time.
63 Music theorists and music psychologists have, in fact, often argued that even in tonal music
memory and expectation take a variety of forms - from the precise and detailed to the most
generalized and selective. See, for instance, Leonard B. Meyer, Emotion and Meaning in Music
(Chicago, 1956); Jamshed J. Barucha, 'Neural Nets, Temporal Composites, and Tonality', The
Psychology of Music, ed. Diana Deutsch (2nd edn, San Diego, 1999), 413-41; Jerrold Levinson,
Music in the Moment (Ithaca, NY, 1997); Irene Deliege and Marc Melen, 'Cue Abstraction in the
Representation of Musical Form', Perception and Cognition of Music, ed. Irene Deliege and John
Sloboda (Hove, 1997), 387-412. Arnie Cox's proposal, discussed earlier in this paper, that the
metaphorical conceptualization of music in terms of path-like motion is grounded by the
phenomenology of expectation and memory shared by both realms of experience, presumes an
unwarrantedly restricted view of these faculties.
64 Fred Lerdahl, for instance, points to the way in which this characteristic of many conte
porary musical works 'inhibits the inference of structure'; see 'Cognitive Constraints on Com
sitional Systems', Contemporary Music Review, 6/2 (1992) ('New Tonality'), 97-121 (p. 104).
65 This extract begins just under three minutes into the recording by the Berlin Philharmo
Orchestra, conducted by Jonathan Nott, of Ligeti's Atmosphbres (Teldec 8573 88261 2); see sou
clip 1, taken from this recording, at <www.jrma.oupjournals.org>.
66 This occurs at letter [F] in the score. 'Stretching' features as a prominent metaphor in G
'Musical Images as Musical Thoughts'; see esp. p. 34.
67 Of course, the title of Ligeti's work suggests a rather different governing metaphor for this
music. Additionally, the composer's programme note for the work refers evocatively to images of
entanglement (the relevant passage is quoted in Gydrgy Ligeti in Conversation, with Peter Virnai,
Josef HIusler et al., London, 1983, 25). These alternative metaphorical frames seem to me more
apt for other parts of Ligeti's score.
68 See sound clip 2, taken from the recording by the London Sinfonietta, conducted by Oliver
Knussen, of Carter's A Celebration of Some 100 X 150 Notes from Three Occasions for Orchestra (Virgin
Classics 791 503-2), at <www.jrma.oupjournals.org>.
69 On the verticality schema see Zbikowski, 'Metaphor and Music Theory'.
or of shifting colours
- are specified by qu
association of 'high' re
darkness is a compone
qualities are importan
opposed to, say, relati
works against a conce
thus makes metaphors
less appropriate. The
evocations of light a
descriptions of music
found in much recent
orchestral piece Du cris
porary composition.73
start, playing either su
dynamic levels. The
form the extremes of
by allowing different p
gain prominence. Saar
to allow the play of li
The simultaneous pre
lines the appropriaten
can readily incorporate
how one could interpr
To place the foregoin
my larger argument
understood in terms
onward motion does
conceptualization that
the implication of t
Conceived in the way
said to be passing, or u
anything, driving onw
and retracting, fluctu
ing and brightening.
that loom prominent
moments: hearing m
(earlier I referred to
of metaphors), and b
when we describe ton
inevitably involve som
of any description of
to see how different sorts of music could motivate non-motional
72 One assumes there is a straightforward association at work here between the lightnes
('high') sky or sun and the darkness of the ('low') earth.
73 See sound clip 4, taken from the recording by the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orc
conducted by Esa-Pekka Salonen, of Saariaho's Du cristal (Ondine ODE 804-2), at
<www.jrma.oupjournals.org>.
conceptualizations of changi
experiences could reflect th
able to distance ourselves
temporal existence that typi
experience.
ABSTRACT
This article argues that music offers experiences of change that are at
with our common understanding of time. Specifically, I question the
spread belief that onward motion is a condition of musical temporali
approach this issue through metaphor theory, which tends to argue f
necessity of metaphorical experiences of time and music in terms of m
I argue that music's changing sound evokes a variety of bodily metap
motion is not ever-present, but intermingles with metaphors of heat,
weight, tension and so on. Works by Ligeti, Carter, KurtAg and Saaria
discussed as case studies.