Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RF Guide Ericsson
RF Guide Ericsson
RF Design Guidelines
Status : Final
Revision : R
Date : 21-6-2005
Author : Eric Noordanus
Development Page : 2 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................7
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 3 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
6 APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................................74
6.1 FREQUENCY BANDS .....................................................................................................................................74
6.2 DESIGN LEVELS ..........................................................................................................................................74
6.3 TRAFFIC, CONGESTION, BLOCKING AND THE USE OF THE ERLANG B TABLE ......................................................75
6.4 THE ERLANG B FORMULA ITSELF ..................................................................................................................77
6.5 ORIGIN OF THE HORIZONTAL PATHLOSS AND ISOLATION FORMULA ..................................................................78
6.6 TMA GAIN ...................................................................................................................................................79
6.7 UMTS BSDS INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................80
6.8 INFORMATION TO BE RETURNED BY A&B.......................................................................................................81
7 EXPLANATIONS......................................................................................................................................82
7.1 SEPARATE ANTENNAE FOR UMTS................................................................................................................82
7.2 SEPARATE FEEDERS FOR UMTS..................................................................................................................82
7.3 UMTS ISOLATION REQUIREMENT .................................................................................................................83
7.4 IM3 & IM5 ISSUES WHEN UMTS IS CO-LOCATED WITH E-GSM/DCS.............................................................83
7.5 WHY IS THE RACAL 1661 A BAD ANTENNA .....................................................................................................84
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 4 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 5 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 6 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
SITE PLANNING STEP 1: SELECTING THE REQUIRED CDU AND CABINET TYPE ............................................................9
SITE PLANNING STEP 2: SELECTING THE REQUIRED CONFIGURATION ......................................................................22
SITE PLANNING STEP 3: ARE THERE TMAS TO BE INSTALLED? ...............................................................................35
SITE PLANNING STEP 4: ARE THERE ANY DUPLEXERS TO BE INSTALLED? ................................................................36
SITE PLANNING STEP 5: SELECTING FEEDERS AND JUMPERS..................................................................................40
SITE PLANNING STEP 6: DETERMINING THE POSSIBLE NUMBER OF ANTENNAE PER SECTOR ......................................42
SITE PLANNING STEP 7: SELECTING THE NEEDED ANTENNAE..................................................................................44
SITE PLANNING STEP 8: DETERMINATION OF THE SITE GOAL...................................................................................52
SITE PLANNING STEP 9: SELECTING THE RIGHT POSITIONS FOR THE ANTENNAE .......................................................52
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 7 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
1 INTRODUCTION
This document is intended to be a guide to RF Engineering & Optimization for the UMTS, DCS and
E-GSM network of BASE in Belgium. Many site equipment and planning related issues related to
RF Engineering & Optimization are covered within this document, however undoubtedly situations
will occur which have not been dealt with in this document. In such circumstances, the RF partner
should contact RF BASE when this occurs.
Whenever the RF partner wants to deviate from the configurations or materials written in this
document, approval should be sought from the RF BASE.
KPI Indicates a subject for which the KPI requirements can be found in the NRF of a site.
For questions concerning what is technically described in this document call Eric Noordanus:
0485-544 964 or mail to: eric.noordanus@base.be
Planning:
• Results on penetration loss investigation by TNO and resulting effect on link budget
calculations
• Micro cell planning
• UMTS antenna upgrade solutions
• Antenna placement
• Tilt tool
• Roof-edge shadow calculation made easier
• Reserved timeslots, EDGE/GPRS & cell capacity
• Preferences for placing UMTS antennae on E-GSM & DCS sites.
• KPI remarks
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 8 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2 RBS equipment
The configuration describing what is planned or installed on site (e.g. RBS, feeder antennae) is to
be registered in INFOBASE in the BSDS in its entirety and according to BSDS documentation.
2.1 Radio Base Station cabinets, cabinet types, capacity and amounts
2.1.1 Cabinet amounts for macro cells
The cabinet amounts to take into account for macro cells are related to the service area size and
type. Urban area size not so much relates to being in a city as well as the clutter type the site
covers.
Capacity
1+1+1 2+2+2 4+4+4 6+6+6 8+8+8
Band Ant. CDU Ant. CDU Ant. CDU Ant. CDU Ant. CDU
E-GSM 1 C+/Gu 1 C+/Gu 1 Gc No No
DCS 1 A/C+ 1 A/C+ 1 C+/Gc No No
2 A 2 A 2 A 2 C+ 2 Gc
CDU-TYPE
2x02 2x06
Band A C+ Gc Gu
E-GSM Not possible 40.5 dBm 42 dBm 45.5 dBm
DCS 43.5 dBm 40 dBm 41 dBm Not used
Table 3: CDUs, cabinets and transmitted power
The maximum amount of TRUs in a 2x02 cabinet is 6 (6 single TRU modules), for a 2x06 cabinet
12 (6 double TRU modules).
Technically an E-GSM CDU-C+ can share a cabinet with a DCS CDU-A (see also section 2.10.2).
This has been used in the past, but is not allowed for new installations or upgrades. Full three
sector E-GSM configurations should be used whenever three antennae can be installed.
Remarks:
• RF BASE will indicate the RF partner in the NRF what the required maximum capacity of a site
needs to be. In the forecast the chosen configuration should be sufficient for at least a year if a
capacity increase would require a cabinet to be swapped or added and 2 years if additional
KPI antennas would be required (to get BP & lease arranged in time). This cannot always be
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 9 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
foreseen, but an effort in this direction should be aimed at. Otherwise an incompletely installed
Gc-D4 or Gc-D8 can be chosen.
• For 2+2+2 DCS (or less) the use of a 2x02 cabinet is preferred. For larger capacities the Gc-
D4/Gc-D8 is.
• For E-GSM site upgrades or new sites Gu-E2 or Gc-E4 is to be installed.
• The number of sectors to be used for planning by the RF partner is set in the NRF document.
KPI • When a 2+2+2 or a 4+4+4 configuration is used in a 2x02, not all TRUs need to be installed
(and not all installed TRUs need to be activated).
The same applies for the 2x06, though for this cabinet always is an even number of TRUs per
sector as a 2x06 is equipped with dual TRU modules.
Cabinet RBS
Indoor 2202, 2206
Outdoor 2302, 2102, 2106
Table 4: Indoor and outdoor 2G cabinet types
¾ Required power, band, needed capacity and possible antennae result in CDU-and cabinet-type.
From this results the needed number of TMAs, duplex filters and the number of required
feeders.
¾ Indoor or outdoor cabinet?
Site planning step 1: Selecting the required CDU and cabinet type
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 10 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2.2 E-GSM & DCS 2x02 and 2x06 macro cabinet structure
Though an uneven numbers of TRUs can be installed in a sector, sectors can only begin on even
positions. A CDU can not be shared by two sectors in a 2x02 and normally not in a 2x06. Therefore
a 3+1+1 configuration is build using a 4+4+4 arrangement in a 2x06 cabinet or at least as a 4+2+2
arrangement in two 2x02 cabinets.
T T T T T T
CDU CDU CDU
R R R R R R G G G
U U U U U U
d d d d d d
CDU CDU CDU T T T T T T
A or A or A or
C+ C+ C+ R R R R R R
U U U U U U
2 2 2 4 4 4
2x02 TRU & CDU layout 2x06 TRU & CDU layout
Figure 2: Cabinet capacity layout
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 11 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Option 1 is technically also possible for 2x02 cabinets equipped with the DXU 11, but as also DXU-
01 and DXU-03 are used in 2x02 cabinets, only option 2 is used for these.
Synchronized cabinets:
In case of synchronizing both cabinets the DXUs in both cabinets are linked by means of an ESB
cable (external synchronization bus). The length of the cable is used as input in the IDB as this
determines the timing delay to be compensated. This cable only links the timing between the
cabinets. The PCM is linked from the first DXU to the second DXU to give the second cabinet its
transmission link to the mobile network. A DXU-11 or DXU-21A needs to be installed to do this.
Effectively, it's the BSC who is joining the PCM data from both cabinets together and making it one
cell, not the cabinets themselves.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 12 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The 2106 cabinet sizes 2106 with open door requires at least 1300 + 710
=2010mm
Figure 4: 2106 cabinet dimensions
The footprint and foot holing are the same as that of the 2102.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 13 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The 2206. To open the door 600mm in front The minimum recommended space in front of a cabinet is
of the cabinet is required. 100cm. This space can be shared with a cabinet opposite to it.
Figure 5: 2206 cabinet dimensions
Indoor power cabinets need the same space per cabinet as a 2202/2206. The amount of power
cabinets required depends on the amount of 2202/2206 cabinets. This is explained in section 2.8.
The RBS 2302 is a weatherproof wall mounted cabinet with two TRUs. The maximum output power
which can be generated of these TRUs is 33 dBm un-combined and 28.5 dBm combined by a
multicasting box. This is often enough for a micro cell.
A 2302 is much smaller than a 2102 or 2202. Note that for the 2102 and the 2202 the minimum
output power after the CDU-C+ is 28.5 dBm (see section 2.27). In order to get more than two
channels on one antenna with these cabinets, either on-air (cross-polar antenna) or external
(outside the cabinet) combining is required.
The 2302 can provide 4 or 6 TRUs by adding two or three RBS 2302 base stations beside each
other (multi extension). The amount of Eirp given by a 2302 configuration can be calculated with
the Microcell_Eirp tool.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 14 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 15 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 16 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
No power supply backup is installed for the RBS 3202, but an ACTURA power supply cabinet
without battery backup is.
Configuration
Current New DCS equipment changes
1 4 Existing D/DTMA used instead of DTMA (see also below)
2 5 D/DTMA and duplexers installed
3 6 D/DTMA and duplexers installed
Table 8: Configuration migrations
− Sectors with a total daily traffic of less than 10 Erlang are candidates to be reduced from
configuration 1 to 6 and the second antenna to be swapped to E-GSM.
− Sectors with more than 10 Erlang total a day, less than 6 Erlang in the busy hour and with the
possibility to have an extra E-GSM antenna should be changed to configuration 4 and an extra
E-GSM antenna.
− When the traffic in the busy hour is more than 6 Erlang, configuration 1 on DCS should be
kept.
− DO NOT MIX IN ONE CABINET CDU-A AND CDU-C+ IF THEY’RE BOTH FOR DCS!
D/DTMAs from a configuration 1 do not need to be replaced for DTMAs when migrating from
configuration 1 to configuration 4. 2 D/DTMA per sectors can be brought back to stock.
When a formerly configuration 1 site is to be upgrade with E-GSM and extra antennae are not
possible, then the site can be reconfigured to a configuration 6.
See also what is mentioned on reconfiguring a configuration 4 in the explanation of the flowchart in
chapter 3.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 17 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The remaining cabinet can be configured as a Master and reused for E-GSM.
2.10.2 Dual band cabinets
Dual band cabinets are to remain exceptional because of the limitations they pose. No new dual
band cabinets should be installed therefore (2x02 & 2x06).
A dual band cabinet needs a DXU to control the sectors in that cabinet. As a result of this the DXU
of the first cabinet cannot extend its control to the second cabinet. Therefore a sector cannot 'flow
over' from the first cabinet to a second dual-band cabinet.
A 4+4+2 TRU configuration plus 1 or 2 E-GSM sectors can only be reduced to 4+2 in the first
cabinet and 2 in the second cabinet and 2, 4 or 2+2 E-GSM.
Changing the order of sectors to fit the cabinets (in the previous example building 4+4+2 DCS + 2
E-GSM as 4+2+4 DCS +2 E-GSM) is not allowed as this poses many risks for the maintenance.
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
C C C C C C C C C C C C
D D D D D D D D D D D D
U U U U U U U U U U U U
2+4+2 2+4 2+(2E+2E or 4E)
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
C C C C C C C C C C C C
D D D D D D D D D D D D
U U U U U U U U U U U U
2+4+4 2+4 4+2E
Indicated TRUs are the maximum per sector. The minimum is 1, except for the
sector shared by master + extension cabinet where the minimum is 2.
Dual-band cabinets cannot share sectors with another cabinet as they are
reconfigured to master cabinets.
Figure 9: 2x02 dual band cabinet layout
No new dual band cabinets are allowed to be created.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 18 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
These is the cabinet type to be used for new sites and site upgrades
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 19 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
One must bear in mind that not in all cases a solution is possible. Only one type of 90° dual band
antennae is available. The Thales 1661-904 is an 85° dual-band antenna, but it has a number of
disadvantages. Use this antenna therefore with care (see the information in section 7.5). Several
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 20 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
vendors say they have types under development, but they’re not in production yet. So if a 90°
opening angle antenna is currently present on a site, the antenna can only be shared by E-GSM if
the Racal 1661-904 is suitable, even if building restrictions require this.
If not, E-GSM cannot be built, unless a DCS space diversity antenna is exchanged for an E-GSM
antenna. But the Eirp and site sensitivity consequences for DCS should be taken into
consideration.
2.12.1 E-GSM (Capacity) upgrades
Capacity upgrades on existing DCS sites is generally done according to the following table:
2.12.2.1 Old feeder and/or antenna sharing configuration indication (not to be used for new installations)
The X in the flowchart below indicates an arbitrary DCS configuration type, found on the next
pages for standard configurations. The number between brackets is the possible E-GSM
configuration:
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 21 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Antennas Feeders
No No C+-E2 / E(3)
Sharing No Yes X(1)
Yes No X(2)
Yes Yes X(3)
The separately build E-GSM site was called configuration E(3) because this configuration strongly
resembles to the DCS configuration 3, although the E-GSM version deploys one cabinet instead of
the two required by the DCS version.
2.12.3 2x06 E-GSM configurations
2x06 E-GSM uses D/DTMAs for amplifying the uplink. The disadvantage to this is that sharing of
feeders with DCS becomes impossible as both of the D/DTMAs of E-GSM as DCS use the feeders
to get their power supply from. Using external Bias-T's for feeding the D/DTMA of either E-GSM or
DCS adds extra loss and the need for an extra power supply feeder which by itself will need to be
protected against lightning. This is under investigation, but not available yet.
2302uc-D1:
The 2 TRUs of the 2302 are not combined and each TRU gets its own antenna. This is for 2 sector
low traffic configurations.
2302uc-D2 (preferred):
The 2 TRUs of the 2302 are on-air combined and each TRU gets a slant on a cross-polar antenna.
This is for 1 sector configurations where maximum power and 2 TRU capacity is required.
If omni antennae are used instead of a cross polar antenna, these will have to be installed not
more than 50cm apart to get effective on air combining.
Disadvantage: 2 feeders between 2302 and antenna are needed.
2302c-D2:
For this configuration the outputs of the 2 TRUs are externally combined by means of a coupler.
The additional loss is about 4.5 dB (3.5 of the coupler and 1 dB of the additional jumpers).
The advantage is that only one feeder for the antenna is needed.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 22 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
For UMTS separate feeders, antennae and cabinet are required. There is therefore only one
configuration consisting of 1 RBS, 2 feeders/sector, 1 ASC/sector, 1 RET/sector and 1
antenna/sector. The consequence is that it is not necessary to give it a specific indicator.
On the next pages you can find all the possible configurations of BASE.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 23 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2.16 Radio Base Station configurations drawings E-GSM 2x02 and 2x06 Macro cells
x x
x x E-GSM 2x06 with CDU-G in uncombined mode
x E-GSM 2x02 with 1 cabinet: 2TRU/sector x maximum capacity 2 TRU/sector
x 2 cabinets: maximum capacity 4 TRU/sector x In combined mode maximum capacity 4 TRU/sector
x x
x One Cross-polar Antennas per Sector
x
Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 24 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2.17 Radio Base Station configurations drawings DCS 2x02 & 2302 Macro cells
x x x x x
x x x x Two Antennae per Sector x
x x Two Cross Polar Antennae
x x Minimum space between x
x x per Sector. Minimum distance
x
x x between Antenna's 2 meter x x Antenna 2 meter
x x x x x One Cross polar Antenna
x per Sector
- 45°
x x
+45°
- 45°
+45°
per Cross Polar Antenna. Max jumper length 2,5m
- 45°
+45°
Max. Length per Jumper 2.5m. Total 2 jumpers per cable-run
Total length of the 4 jumpers
D/D D/D D/D D/D < 7m Total 2 jumpers per cable-run Max total jumper length <4m
TMA TMA TMA TMA Max total jumper length <4m
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 25 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x Two Cross Polar Antenna's x x Two Cross Polar Antenna's x One Cross Polar Antenna
x x x x x
- 45°
+45°
- 45°
- 45°
- 45°
+45°
+45°
+45°
Max. Length per Jumper 2.5m.
Three Jumper cables for Rx cable run. Four Jumper cables per cablerun Four Jumper cables per cablerun
Max. Length per Jumper 2.5m.
Total Rx jumper length <7m Max. Length per Jumper 2.5m.
Total length of the 4 jumpers
DTMA DTMA Two Jumper cables for Tx cable run Total length of the 4 jumpers
Total Tx jumper length <4m D/D D/D < 7m
D/D D/D < 7m
TMA TMA
TMA TMA
When configuration 1 is reduced to 4
Tx Rx Rx Tx
Tx/Rx Tx/Rx Tx/Rx Tx/Rx
Four Jumper cables. EXT EXT EXT EXT
Max. Length per Jumper 2M. DUPL DUPL DUPL DUPL
Tx Rx Tx Rx Four Jumper cables. Tx Rx Tx Rx Four Jumper cables.
Max' Length per Jumper 2M. Max' Length per Jumper 2M.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 26 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
x x x x
x x x x
x x Two Cross-polar Antennae per Sector
x x Minimum space between
x One Antenna per Sector x One Antenna per Sector
x x Antennae 2 meter x x
x x x x
x x
- 45°
- 45°
+45°
+45°
Max jumper length 2,5m
- 45°
+45°
Max jumper length 2,5m
true space diversity. Total 2 jumpers per cable-run Total 2 jumpers per cable-run
Max total jumper length <4m Max total jumper length <4m
Three feeders per Sector direct
from RBS.
RBS 2x02
RBS 2x02 RBS 2x02
CDU-C+ CDU-C+ CDU-C+
6 TRU/sector 2 TRU/sector 2 TRU/sector
3 cabinets 1 cabinet 1 cabinet
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 27 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
x
x Active antenna Unit 500W
x x
x x
x One Cross Polar Antenna x
x per Sector x
x x ALARM/DC Cable
- 45°
+45°
+45°
Tx/Rx
EXT
DUPL
Tx Rx One Jumper cable
Max length 2 M.
RBS 2x02
CDU-A RBS 2302
CDU-A PBC
1 TRU/sector
2 TRU/sector 1/sector
1 cabinet 1 cabinet/sector
Configuration129 Configuration13Maxite
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 28 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2.18 Radio Base Station configurations drawings DCS 2x06 Macro cells
The naming convention for configurations for 2x06 configurations is different. The following system is used:
CDU-type, CDU-mode, a minus, network type letter (D for DCS, E for E-GSM), maximum number of TRUs. Example:
Gc-D4 This means a CDU-G used in combined mode for DCS with a maximum capacity of 4 TRUs
x x x
x DCS 2x06 with CDU-G in combined mode x x DCS 2x06 with CDU-G in combined mode
x maximum capacity 4 TRU x x maximum capacity 8 TRU
x x x
x One Cross-polar Antennas per Sector x x Two Cross-polar Antennas per Sector
x x x Minimum space between antennas is 2m.
The cross jumpering shown is to give
- 45°
- 45°
- 45°
+45°
+45°
+45°
true space diversity.
Max. Length per Jumper 2.5m. Max. Length per Jumper 2.5m.
D/D D/D Three Jumper cables for each cable run. D/D D/D D/D D/D Three Jumper cables for each cable run.
TMA TMA Total jumper length <7m TMA TMA TMA TMA Total jumper length <7m
Standard DCS D/DTMA type is used Standard DCS D/DTMA type is used
Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
Tx/Rx
Configuration14Gc-D4 Configuration15Gc-D8
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 29 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2.19 Radio Base Station configurations drawings DCS 2302 Micro cells
2x OMNI ANTENNA
OMNI ANTENNA
PANEL ANTENNA
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 30 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
RET
ASC
Tx/Rx
Max. 2 m jumper
Configuration19UMTS
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 31 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
2+2+2 4+4+4
Non-Preferred Preferred Exceptional Preferred
40.5 dBm 45.5 dBm 40.5 dBm 42 dBm
Configuration C+-E2 Configuration Gu-E2 Configuration C+-E4 Configuration Gc-E4
uses one 2x02 cabinet uses one 2x06 cabinet uses two 2x02 cabinets uses one 2x06 cabinet
CDU-C+ CDU-G uncombined CDU-C+ CDU-G combined
per sector: per sector: per sector: per sector:
1 antenna 1 antenna 1 antenna 1 antenna
no D/DTMA 2 D/DTMA E-GSM no D/DTMA 2 D/DTMA E-GSM
2 cables 2 cables 2 cables 2 cables
No external duplexing No external duplexing No external duplexing No external duplexing
Table 11: E-GSM general configuration requirements. The drawings can be found in section 2.16
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 32 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Table 12: DCS general configuration requirements. The drawings can be found in section 2.17 and 2.18
There are 5 preferred and 8 exceptional DCS configurations defined:
• For macro sites that need a 4+4+4 capacity, the preferred configuration for extending an existing DCS site with config 4 or 6 is configuration 1 because of the
higher Eirp and sensitivity it offers, in comparison to configurations 2 and 3, which are not preferred.
• For new macro sites that need a 4+4+4 capacity, the preferred configuration is Gc-D4 as only 1 cabinet and 1 antenna per sector is needed.
• For macro sites that need a 2+2+2 capacity, the preferred configuration is configuration 4 if 2 antennae per sector are possible, which in fact offers the
highest Eirp and sensitivity of all the described configurations. Configuration 5 and 6 are non-preferred configurations.
• Configurations 7, 8, 9 and the Maxite are exceptional and have to be escalated to get approval for.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 33 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Table 13: DCS general configuration requirements. The drawings can be found in section 2.19
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 34 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 35 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 36 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Dimensions:
Width Height Depth Weight
ASC 160 312 83 5.0 Kg
The RET is used to remotely adjust the electrical tilt of the antenna. Each UMTS sector is installed
with 1 RET.
¾ 2x02 with CDU-A uses 1 dual or 2 single duplexers per antenna for all configurations except
configuration 4 that uses none and configuration 9 that uses only 1 single duplexer.
Site planning step 4: Are there any duplexers to be installed?
See also the configuration requirement overviews in Table 11 and Table 12.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 37 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Sometimes it is desired that feeders are shared between 2x06 (Hi-cap) and 2x02 (Low-cap).
The problem is that TMAs receive their power supply and control through the feeders, so only one
of the two systems can have TMAs and as all 2x06 configurations have TMAs, the 2x02
configuration should be without.
So what are the possibilities?
In order to have power for the TMAs not shorted, DC-blocks are needed in the system which uses
no TMAs.
BE SURE TO USE THE CORRECT /1, /2, /3 or /4 FOR THE DUAL BAND COMBINER TYPE!
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 38 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Example of TMA for E-GSM while feeders are shared Example of TMA for DCS while feeders are shared
Figure 15: Examples of feeder sharing with TMA usage
The 792903 consists of two stacked 792902 units. It has no internal DC-blocks on the GSM port so
these need to be installed on several configurations (see E-GSM cable sharing schematics).
The loss is also higher than the dual band combiner from Ericsson (0.15dB for E-GSM and 0.25dB
for DCS, but the loss of the DC-blocks on the E-GSM needs to be added to this, in several cases).
The 793363, the wide-band version (E-GSM + DCS/UMTS), has a somewhat higher VSWR.
Figure 16: Kathrein dual-Band Combiner 792903 and 793363. NO LONGER TO BE USED!!!
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 39 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
3.4 DC block
Because of the DC transparency of the Dual-band combiner (except for the FAB 102 863 from
Ericsson) in case TMAs for DCS and the feeders of E-GSM and DCS are shared, DC-blocks need
to be used at the E-GSM antenna and the E-GSM RBS. This way the current supply for the TMA is
not short-circuited by the antenna and the E-GSM RBS.
The DC-Block is mounted directly on the E-GSM connector of the Dual-band combiner (without
jumper). The jumpers shown in the drawings between Dual band combiners and DC-block are not
actually there.
Only in case of constructional limitations (minimum-bending radii cannot be fulfilled, lack of space)
deviation from these limits will be allowed.
For the minimum allowed bending radius the value for the 10 times repeated bending have been
taken because if the single bending minimum radius is used and the first installation needs to be
changed, the cable needs to be replaced.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 40 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
3.5.2 Jumpers
In all configurations also jumper cables are to be used on feeders larger ½” to avoid stress on the
antenna connectors. Even straight stretches with feeders larger than ½” directly mounted to the
antenna cause stress on the connectors because of the temperature coefficient of expansion of the
cable. Therefore feeders larger than ½" need to be installed with jumpers.
In order to minimize the attenuation of the jumpers, the length of the jumpers should be kept to
what is required and using prefabricated jumpers to ensure quality.
The allowed loss between RBS and antenna is dependent on the elements used, but should be
less or equal to the sum of the elements found on the specified loss table plus 0.3 dB. In all cases
the loss should remain below the values given in the table below.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 41 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
CABLES
Jumpers total loss: Jumpers Jumpers >1.5m: 1/2" low loss
m GSM 1800 E-GSM Quadrant Bending radius velocity GSM1800 E-GSM
1 0.2 0.142 dB 1/2" Flexible 30mm 82% 0.17 0.112 dB/m
1.5 0.285 0.198 dB 1/2" Low loss 125mm 88% 0.115 0.072 dB/m
2 0.26 0.174 dB connectors 0.03 0.03 dB
2.5 0.3175 0.21 dB
3 0.375 0.246 dB
3.5 0.4325 0.282 dB Feeders Feeder attenuation dB/100m
4 0.49 0.318 dB Eupen 1/2" 7/8" 1 1/4" 1 5/8"
Velocity 88% 88% 88% 88%
E-GSM 6.9 3.92 3.26 2.37
GSM1800 10.2 5.91 5.08 3.69
Bending radius 15 cm 25 cm 40 cm 50 cm
Table 18: Jumper, feeder and other losses and bending radii.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 42 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
3.6 Antennae
3.6.1 Antenna installation
More than anything else, antennae determine the behavior of a site. The correct understanding of
the consequences of antenna behavior, selection and placement on a site is of crucial importance.
3.6.2 Possible number of antennae
After the required capacity and coverage is defined in the nominal plan of a site, one has to
investigate the maximum possible antenna amount and sizes on a site candidate.
Being able to use separate antennae for DCS and E-GSM on a site candidate is an advantage as it
gives the possibility to use 90º and adjust the antennae to what is required (tilt, direction, see also
section 3.8.1). If this is not needed, separate antennae for 2G and 3G have priority.
In the past many DCS cells were given two cross-polar antennae per sector. The combination of
space– and polarization diversity gives a total diversity gain of about 3.5 dB. This is higher then the
gain you get with polarization diversity only.
It is no longer preferred to plan with space and cross polar diversity on new DCS cells as the
purpose of new DCS is now to relieve traffic from an E-GSM with too much traffic.
Only when it is expected that the 1 dB additional uplink gain is needed to do this effectively
¾ Are separate antennae for DCS and E-GSM possible on a site candidate? Which
sizes?
¾ Reserve space for separate UMTS antennae.
Site planning step 6: Determining the possible number of antennae per sector
The capacity, together with the number of antennae per sector, determines which CDU and cabinet
types can be used.
3.7.2.3 Option 2c: Combining two DCS antennae together with E-GSM
Two DCS antennae can be combined together with E-GSM in the 742241.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 43 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Base, Proximus or Mobistar cannot share antennae for UMTS with E-GSM/DCS because of the
risk of isolation and IM3 problems.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 44 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
¾ What are the needed horizontal opening angle and tilt and minimum gain
¾ What is the maximum allowed vertical opening angle (related to antenna height)
¾ What antenna size is possible
¾ Is single band possible or does it need to be dual/triple-band
¾ In case of 2 DCS antennae both should be of the same type, azimuth and tilt and not
differing more than 5% in height.
Site planning step 7: Selecting the needed antennae
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 45 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The percentages are to be calculated on the amount of sites in the batch assigned to the RF partner. Written consent of the RF BASE is required for breaching these
limits. RF BASE will require a motivation for every site using the antenna preference type (Non-preferred and/or exceptional) for which the percentage limit is not met.
The use of the -10dB multiplier is explained in section 4.3.4, but basically this figure should be multiplied with the distance to the edge of the roof and added with height of
the edge (or other obstructions) itself to get the required height of the antenna on the roof and have no antenna pattern cut-off by the roof-edge.
For usage of antennae with a vertical opening angle of more than 11°, permission from RF BASE is required.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 46 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
E-GSM E-GSM
Preferred: Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Height Non-preferred: Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Height
Antenna (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (mm) Antenna (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (mm)
739686 17.5 65 7 0/-7 0.23 2580 739634 17.0 65 9.5 -6 0.45 1936
739666 16 88 7 0/-7 0.25 2580 739660 15.5 90 9.5 -6 0.34 1936
Non-preferred: Exceptional:
739630 18.0 65 7 0 0.18 2580 739684 15 65 14.5 0/-14 0.53 1296
739636 18.0 65 7 -6 0.31 2580 739664 13.5 88 15 0/-14 0.51 1296
739650 17.0 90 7 0 0.18 2580 Production stopped : Replacement
739662 17.0 90 7 -6 0.3 2580 739639 16.5 65 19.5 -2/-10 0.34 1996 739685
739685 16.5 65 9.5 0.5/-10 0.34 1996 739640 17.5 65 7 0/-7 0.23 2580 739686
739665 15 88 10 0.5/-10 0.34 1996 739681 15 65 14.5 0/-14 1296 739684
Table 21: Dual system antenna types (1661-904-01 is from Thales/Racal, the other types from Kathrein)
For other E-GSM antenna types (dual- & triple system) see tables on the next page.
UMTS
Preferred: Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Height
Antenna (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (mm)
742215 18 65 6.2 0/-10 0.29 1302
Non-preferred:
742211 15.2 64 13 0/-10 0.42 662
741989 16.7 88 6.5 0/-8 0.28 1302
Exceptional:
741988 14.1 88 13 0/-10 0.45 662
Table 22: Single system antenna types UMTS (1 system connectable)
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 47 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
DCS UMTS
Preferred: Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Connectors Height Width
Antenna dBi (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (mm) (mm)
742234 17.5 66 7 0/-8 17.8 64 6.5 0/-8 0.25 4 1304 299
Table 24: Dual system antenna types DCS/UMTS + DCS/UMTS (2 systems connectable)
The 742234 is very useful to combine two DCS antennae in one antenna, to free up space for UMTS, but 4 feeders for it.
It is possible to combine DCS and UMTS in this antenna, but as the azimuths of UMTS cannot be planned independent from DCS, this should remain exceptional.
E-GSM UMTS (Lower ant. section S1) DCS (Upper antenna section S2)
Preferred: Gain Hor Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Gain Hor. Vert. El. Tilt -10 dB Connectors Height
Antenna (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (X) (dBi) (°) (°) (°) angle (°) (mm)
742241* 17 65 7.5 0.5/-7 17 63 6.8 0/-8 0.25 16 65 7.8 0/-8 6 2628
Table 25: Triple system antenna types E-GSM + DCS/UMTS+ DCS/UMTS (3 systems connectable)
*=gain depends on the antenna section and frequency (diff. 0.5 dB). To reduce confusion it is recommended that the lower antenna section is used for UMTS (if used as
a triple band antenna).
The 742241 can be used to combine E-GSM with two DCS antennae in one antenna “box”.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 48 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
For the installation of the jumpers to the antenna connectors on six connector antennae Kathrein advises the use of installation tool shown below.
Figure 18: Kathrein installation tool for 6 jumper antennae 850 10005
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 49 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 50 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Omni Kathrein Bi dir Kathrein 738446 65º 5 dBi Racal 1764 MAT-Jaybeam
738454 2 dBi MA431X28
Figure 20: Micro cell antennae
N-connectors on antennae, splitters etc. for micro cells and indoor cells are easier during
installation because of their smaller size.
Due to the low isolation between the slants (typically 25 dB) is the antenna 1764 unsuitable to be
used as antenna for 2x02 or 2x06 cabinets.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 51 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
4 Cell Planning
Site type Cell size Cell height Traffic type Networks Purpose
(m) (m)
Umbrella ≈5000 >50 Large area DCS Very large coverage area
Macro >500 20-50 Area E-GSM, DCS, UMTS Large coverage area
Mini 100-500 10-20 Limited local E-GSM, DCS, UMTS Local coverage area/traffic offload
Micro 20-100 5-10 Street, slow moving DCS, UMTS Traffic offload/small coverage area
Pico <20 <5 Office room, shop DCS Traffic offload
Isolated sites & assigning sites to different parameter layers than its physical site type:
It is not desirable to have different physical site types within the same parameter layer, because of
the created network imbalance. The consequence of ignoring this is that it makes the frequency
plan more inefficient (resulting in problematic frequency assignment). Only when a site is isolated
from the surrounding sites, this can be done without causing problems. Examples are sites in
valleys and indoor sites such as in a building or a stadium.
Capacity:
The capacity required by the cell will need to be investigated. A rough indication can be derived
from looking at the capacity of its future neighbors. If more than 50% are of a certain capacity and
the cell size is comparable and the customers are roughly equally spread, it is likely it’ll need that
capacity as well.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 52 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
As a result of the KPI requirements which a site candidate proposed by the RF partner has to be
able to meet, a candidate site is not allowed to be shifted from the nominal site location for more
KPI than 20% of the distance between the nominal and its nearest neighboring site.
It can be expected that the candidate site will not contribute to the network structure as it is
required to do when it doesn’t fulfill this requirement.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 53 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The arguments mentioned in Table 31 should of course be investigated in relation with the KPI
height and coverage/interference requirements and height of the surrounding clutter. This might
KPI result in feedback back to RF BASE if these requirements contradict.
Further remarks:
• To reduce the visual impact of a cellular site, it maybe necessary to wall mount antennae
(perhaps even paint them), in order to satisfy the owner and/or town planning requirements.
Proper antenna distribution along the poles Wrong distribution of antenna along the poles
Figure 22: Antenna distribution on rooftops
The second distribution is wrong for several reasons:
• The ‘inwards’ pointing TX/RX antennae are likely to be influenced by shadowing than the
outward pointing RX-div antenna or antenna from another system, if mounted close together
(less than 5 meters), the poles themselves can become source of shadowing themselves if not
designed well.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 54 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
• The ‘inwards’ pointing antennae transmitted signal point directly into each other’s opening
angles, Rx blocking can occur if distances are too short (see section 4.5).
4.3.2 DCS, E-GSM and combined mounting on rooftop poles
Figure 24: E-GSM should always remain within the -3dB pattern of DCS
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 55 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
If on a cell the multi-band cell feature is to be enabled, the coverage footprint should be the same
for E-GSM and DCS as much as possible, resulting in the requirement of using same antenna
opening angles, azimuths and adjustment of tilt of both layers in combination with the required
coverage, to reach this goal.
4.3.4 Antenna obstruction and shadowing
In this document:
Downtilt is a negative figure;
uptilt is positive !
Be careful, not in all tools and
-10dB Antenna angle by everyone interpreted the
AGL
Roofedge
Eh
Liftroom or roof
The –10 dB of the vertical opening angle should remain unblocked, as shown in Figure 25, with
KPI future downtilt increase to the maximum of the tilt range (the tilt-range of an adjustable tilt antenna
or ½ the vertical opening angle, rounded down, for a fixed tilt antenna) taken into account.
The –10dB vertical antenna opening angle is specified in the supplier documentation. These
angles are calculated into multipliers in Table 19 to Table 26 on pages 45 to 47.
For antennae with variable electrical tilt the value for the maximum tilt is taken.
For example:
A 739686 is mounted at 5m distance from the edge of the roof and the roof edge is 10cm high, the
minimum required height for the antenna becomes:
In case of dual-band antennae, always take the larger of the two angles as multiplier.
So more height should be used, or the antenna should be mounted closer to the roof edge.
4.3.5 Antenna installation on towers
Separate installation with the DCS antennae a little above E-GSM is recommended to ensure DCS
capable of giving capacity and taking over E-GSM as much as possible but is not mandatory. The
same distance requirements (vertical optimum distance of 50cm and horizontally 10cm or more)
apply.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 56 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
A micro cell antenna covers the area what it can see, plus a few of meters more (due to reflections
and short range penetration).
To get a good handover between micro cells, coverage overlap of about a few dozen meters is
required.
The optimum signal level at antenna connector is 20-25 dBm in most cases, but this is also
dependent on the locally available frequencies. Sometimes the power will need to be increased in
order to reduce the influence of interfering surrounding macro cells on a micro cell. If this is the
case it also means that the coverage in that area is too low or that the macro layer needs some
antenna reworks.
The transmitted power of a micro cell can be calculated with the help of the Micro cell Eirp tool.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 57 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The isolation is not only formed by the pathloss between two antennae.
It is often the most important factor in the isolation between two base stations, but other important
factors are:
• The effective gain of each antenna in the direction of the other antenna in the frequency band
of transmitted signal under consideration (to be looked up in the documentation of the vendor)
• Cable losses
• TMA gain (if the other signal is in the amplified band of the TMA, otherwise loss)
• Duplex filter losses and out-of-band filtering
To avoid unwanted signals into the receiver, at least 30 dB isolation between a transmitting and a
receiving antenna and between two transmitting antennae is required. This requirement also
applies to cross-polar antennae slant isolation. Feeder loss gives additional isolation increase.
This is also valid for sites shared with the other operators. But with other operators not all data is
known or might be subject to change, so extra precautions must be taken.
α Dvert
Dhor
d
30 × Eirp
E= (V/M)
d
Translated into horizontal and vertical pathloss leads this for vertical separation:
d
AV = 28 + 40 × log( ) AV in dB, d and λ in m.
λ
For practical reasons (connectors, mounting) the vertical separation should be 20cm or more
(30cm in case of a RET usage).
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 58 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
d
AH = 22 + 20 × log( ) − (G1 + G 2) AV in dB, d and λ in m. G1 and G2 in dB, not dBi!
λ
G1 and G2 are the gains of the antennae in the direction of the other antenna. G1 and G2 can be
positive or negative, dependent on their respective angles (see also section 6.5).
For λ for E-GSM 0.3 and for DCS & UMTS 0.15 can be taken.
When antennae are vertically and horizontally separated, the formula becomes:
α ° × ( AV − AH )
AC = AH + AC in dB.
90°
dvert
α = arctan( )
dhor
dvert and dhor are the distance and the difference in height between two antennae.
Only when the antennae, TMAs and duplex filters have the same frequency behavior, the isolation
will be the same in both directions. Otherwise the isolation will be directionally different.
When the antennae are from the same base station sector, the isolation between the antennae is
there to make diversity effective (see chapter 4.5.3.1).
When the antennae are from different systems, e.g. operators, the separation is necessary to
ensure the isolation is enough to prevent the interference and/or shadowing from one system to the
other.
The allowed level of interference is according to the ETSI GSM 05.05 specifications:
Rx blocking 'out of band'; GSM 900: +8 dBm; DCS: 0dBm
In all configurations of Base duplex filters are used, either in the combiner itself or outside the RBS.
DCS (D/)DTMA and external duplexers provide band filtering
Apart from the duplex filter itself the DTMA and the D/DTMA also have in build duplex filtering
capability. But as since December 2001 for DCS new external dual duplex filters are used with less
filtering capabilities than the previous single duplexers, the duplex filtering is set to 30dB to the
input of the receivers.
This leads to the following requirements for sharing with other operators:
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 59 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Because another operator can change the direction of his antennae or add a network without
notice, it is assumed that the main beams are directed towards each other and transmit the same
band.
With the free space pathloss formula these values are reached at 2.5m horizontal distance in
case we use DCS on a site and 3.5m in case of E-GSM. When mounted against a flat surface or
when it is certain that the used angles of both operators are more than 120º different, a minimum
horizontal distance of 1.5m is enough for E-GSM and 1m for DCS. But this is an absolute minimum
requirement with no margins left!
Vertically 0.5m is enough to fulfill the isolation requirement, but to prevent mutual antenna
disturbance during antenna reworks 1m should be used.
Between antenna and dish a 0.3m distance should be maintained. In order to make free rotation
possible, it is preferred not to mount antennae next to dishes. If this is the only solution, then the
free propagation view requirements should be met.
--The next version will further specify requirements on isolation between operators for non-antenna
pole mounting—
4.5.2 Isolation requirements UMTS
Ericsson states that for sharing of antennae a minimum isolation of 30 dB is required between e-
GSM, DCS and UMTS. Kathrein dual and triple band antennae fulfill these requirements but for
reasons mentioned elsewhere in this document, sharing UMTS antennae with E-GSM/DCS is not
recommended.
UMTS <> DCS distance of 20 cm is based on max 15° towards each other.
15,0°
15,0°
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 60 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Lightning Rods
15cm
RX / TX RX / TX
1.5m
Jumpers
2m > 2.3 m
TMA TMA
The azimuths of the antennae have to be taken into account to calculate the separation between
them. The separation may need to increase depending on the azimuth angle to get the optimum
effective separation distance. This is explained in the example below.
If, for example, the antennae have 75° azimuth angle and are mounted on a 0° plane, the effective
diversity distance between antennae 2.3 meters mounted apart is 2.2m.
It is calculated this way:
75°
2.2 m
RX / TX
75°
RX / TX
Figure 30: Effective space for diversity and rotation in plan view
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 61 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
If you can’t put horizontally spaced antennae on all sectors then in some configurations it is worth it
to put the antennae vertically separated in order to have space diversity on all sectors, but this is
less effective than horizontal spacing. The distance should be kept to a minimum (<1m) in order to
limit propagation behavior differences due to different heights.
But this is often not possible, especially for all sectors from a site. An often-occurring situation is
where the antennae have an angle with the wall to get the desired antenna angles.
This reduces the free view and possibly compromises sector overlap.
In order to have a sufficient hand-over angle at least 75° of the antenna should have a free view for
90° antennae and 70° for 65° antennae, the same way as is the case for camouflage material (see
therefore the explanation for free angle requirements for camouflage materials.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 62 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
min. 30°
material is to be
used
Possible location
to use other
materials for
constructional
+45° -45°
purposes
min. 30°
Optimum: 50 - 100 mm
Limits: 20 - 2000 mm
Antenna
RF unblocked angle:
70° for 65° opening
angle antennas
75° for 85° opening
angle antennas
At least
30°
Non-Camouflage
material allowed
Non-Camouflage
material allowed
Optimum: 50 - 100 mm
Limits: 20 - 2000 mm
Camouflage material
Optimum: 50 - 100 mm
Limits: 20 - 2000 mm
RF unblocked angle:
Non-Camouflage 70° for 65° opening angle antennas
material allowed 75° for 85° opening angle antennas At least
30°
Non-Camouflage
material allowed
Figure 32: Antenna free angle requirements when mounted in the corner of a construction
Approved camouflage materials are Epoxy-glass and Polyester for which it is proven the loss is
less than 1dB, reflection is less than 30dB on 15 cm of the antenna.
Materials like slate and would are not allowed to install antennae behind. Glass only in special
cases for micro cells.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 63 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Knobs left and right at the bottom of the Backside of the antenna. The box in the centre is the
antenna are to adjust electrical tilt with. phase shifter. The white plastic is the tilt adjustment knob.
Figure 33: Inside a Kathrein adjustable tilt antenna 742234
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 64 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
A closer look what can be learned from antenna patterns and their consequences on the behavior
of a site becomes important. For practicality the 3-D antenna pattern is reduced to a cut through
the vertical plane in the centre of the main beam (horizontal direction 0°) and a cut through the
horizontal plane (vertical direction 0°). But for correct understanding it must be kept in mind that a
cut through an apple in the middle is different than when taken out of the middle.
4.6.4 Vertical plane pattern
This pattern shows a number of important features of an antenna:
1. Characterizations of the level of null fill in the lower (towards the earth) lobes. This is best
measured relative to the main beam. A good null fill ensures a relative stable signal level
development for the customers when moving inside the coverage area of a cell
2. Characterization of the gain of upper secondary lobes relative to that of the main beam. The
most important feature is the reduction of the first upper side lobe relative to the main beam.
The power transmitted in this range is directed above the horizon and contributes only to
interference for higher situated customers. The consequence of good side lobe suppression is
that a site should be at least as high as the customers it's serving. This can be important when
trying to cover a high office block from another building (but also keep in mind reflection effects
when other buildings block the antenna signal).
3. The vertical beam width of the antenna is determined by finding the 3dB points on the main
beam and then measuring the angular separation between the two points. The size of it
determines how soon the signal of a cell degrades at its coverage boundary and the size of the
handover area (see Figure 38)
4. Last, the pointing angle of the main beam can be determined. This is referred to as down tilt
angle. Applying more down tilt reduces the size of the cell (see section 4.6.6)
Figure 34: Vertical pattern with the four features of merit described above displayed.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 65 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
If the horizontal pattern is seen as a function on the gain of the antenna on the horizon, a pattern
such as shown in Figure 38 will be found.
Note however, that most of the horizontal patterns given by vendors are cut through the main
beam. This hides the consequence of using antennae with a large vertical opening angle.
Figure 35: Shows the reduction of the gain from the horizon as a function of the tilt.
By using down tilt, the gain on the horizon of the main beam (0°) is reduced, bringing effectively the
edge of the cell closer to the site. This gain reduction is important as it helps avoiding cell to cell
interference. Also, the increased tilt acts as a null fill, providing more intense signal strength in the
covered area. This can be seen in Figure 36.
Using electrical tilt doesn’t change the gain of the antenna significantly, only where the main beam
is pointing at.
There are some technical side effects by which the actual gain is quite often varies within a range
of about 0.5 dB over the electrical tilting range, but these are considered to be of minor importance.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 66 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Figure 36: Vertical pattern of an antenna with a vertical beam width of 15°and an electrical down
tilt of 6°. The gain reduction on the horizon is 3 dB. The green pattern is that of an
Omni.
Only when the coverage must be as large as possible and interference is no issue, such as in a
valley or a large area surrounded by trees, antennae with no tilt can be used but be careful with
overshoot effect or shadowing, otherwise (electrical) down tilting is advisable.
On the other hand, high levels of tilting (on top of hills, high buildings and towers, etc.) can also
help to increase coverage in narrow streets, but excessive mechanical down tilting can cause
pattern distortions that make actual coverage quality deteriorate (see section 4.6.6).
There is also the line-of-sight effect: No matter how much an antenna is tilted, if there is a line of
sight to that antenna and not to the one the customer would actually need to be served from, the
serving antenna will often be the one the mobile ‘sees’.
4.6.6 Beam Tilt
The antenna beam is often tilted to limit the interference to nearby cells or to focus coverage on
particular areas closer to the site. There are 2 possible types of tilt possible: electrical and
mechanical. To mechanically tilt an antenna it is physically tilted over by a few degrees, while an
electrically tilted antenna must be manufactured with tilt built in.
It is not allowed to mechanically tilt an antenna with more than ½ its vertical opening angle
(rounded down and excluding any terrain angle).
The electrical tilt is achieved by varying the phase of the RF feed to each of the elements in the
array inside the antenna. The mechanical tilt may be varied by physically moving the antenna on
site, while the electrical tilt is not usually adjustable.
The difference between mechanical and electrical downtilting can be understood by reference to
the diagrams shown in Figure (1) below.
In Figure (1a), a BTS antenna with a zero degree electrical downtilt is tilted down mechanically.
The resultant “family” of elevation beam patterns for a discrete set of azimuth angles show that
only in the forward (zero azimuth angle) direction has the elevation beam actually tilted down by
the full mechanical tilt angle. As the magnitude of the azimuth angle increases, the actual elevation
beam tilt reduces from maximum according to a co sinusoidal function. Hence, for +/- 90° azimuth,
the elevation beam has not tilted at all. For azimuth angles beyond +/- 90°, the elevation beam
actually tilts upward for a mechanical downtilt. As will be discussed below, the result of this
behavior of elevation beam tilting using mechanical tilt is to cause the “footprint” of the beam inter
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 67 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
section with the ground to remain spread out left and right of beam centre and to only move in
toward the tower fully in the forward direction. However, the back lobe does “fire” upward and as
such does not intersect with the ground at its maximum level. (The actual back lobe level that
intersects with the ground will depend upon the elevation beam width of the back lobe and the
amount of mechanical tilt applied to the antenna.)
In contrast to mechanical downtilt, electrical downtilt truly tilts the elevation beam down equally for
all azimuth angles as shown in Figure (1b). The result of this behavior of elevation beam tilting, as
will be discussed below, is to provide a “footprint” of the beam intersection with the ground that
“tucks-in” in all azimuth directions around the tower.
It is generally agreed that electrical downtilt is superior to mechanical downtilt because the beam is
tilted down equally for all azimuth angles; however, it will be shown below that a combination of
electrical and mechanical downtilts can provide a useful tool to network planners by making it
possible to alter the shape of the beam “footprint” to some degree.
Flat
Earth
“Great Circle” Locus of Points of the Intersection of the Peak of the Elevation Beam @ Each
Azimuth Angle & the Sphere Around the Antenna
Flat
Circular Locus of Points of the Intersection of the Peak of the Elevation Beam
Earth
@ Each Azimuth Angle & a Flat Earth
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 68 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
with 4° tilt, but most of it is pointed towards the ground. This can also be seen in the Tilt tool (see
section 4.6.7).
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 69 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Ring 3: 2nd interference ring. Average 11 cells co + 5 adjacent interfered by the serving cell.
The drawing shows a number of sites evenly spread in an area. Whereas this is a theoretical
situation, the principal is applicable everywhere.
The allowed number of frequencies assignable to a serving cell can now be calculated quite
simple:
DCS frequency band size 110 frequencies:
1st ring
No adjacent frequencies allowed: 6x2 (for adjacent) x6 (cells) = 72 frequencies
Co frequencies allowed: 6x 1 (for co) x 5 (cells) = 30
72+30 = 102
If the network is designed less restrictive and the 2nd ring needs to be taken into account, the
calculation becomes:
4x2x11=88
4x1x5=20
88+20=108
Now only 4 channels can be assigned on average.
For E-GSM, with a band of 38 cells, the number of frequencies which can be assigned are much
less:
1st ring:
No adjacent: 2x2x6=24
No co: 2x1x5=10
24+10=35
Only an average of 2 frequencies is possible.
38-35=3. About 3 cells of the 11(6+5) can be assigned a 3rd frequency.
If the DCS cells are upgraded with E-GSM and not carefully tilted, the 2nd ring also becomes
important:
1x2x11=22
1x1x5=5
22+5=27
The 11 additional frequencies (38-27) have to be divided among 11+5=16 cells.
Now these calculations are theoretical, but not too far from reality.
Figure 41: 739686, EDT -3º, 30m, Spike at 30º is angle at 50m from site, spike at 0º is horizon.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 70 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Whereas it is visible from this screen that when a cell + handover range of 1km is required, this tilt
is sufficient, but obviously if a smaller range is needed, a stronger tilt should be applied.
For a cell range of 500m + handover range of 250m a configuration (for the same antenna and
height) as can be seen in Figure 42 can be applied.
Figure 42: 739686, EDT -7º, 30m, spike at 30º is angle at 50m from site, spike at 0º is horizon.
The gain of the antenna is stable in the service area (in this range a signal reduction of 1dB can be
neglected) and reduces at 700m with 4 dB at ring 2 (as the next cells will normally be at about
1000m, if the cell range is 500m) and at ring 3, 1000 further, the antenna pattern reduces the DL
interference signal by 6.5 dB.
There is also a clear difference in gain between UL an DL, but as this remains in the cell +
handover range within 1 dB this is acceptable. The spikes and/or gain differences in the first 200m
In the figure below you can see when it is attempted to install a 742266 antenna a 100m with -7º
downtilt. This tool can be an aid in selecting the optimum downtilt angle for a site in more difficult
cases like calculating the optimum tilt for antennae with a vertical opening angle of more than 10º.
Below is an extreme case where an antenna is installed on a very high site and a very high tilt.
Figure 43: 742266, EDT -7º, 100m, spike at 65º is angle at 50m from site, spike at 0º is horizon.
As can be seen from the right graph the cell is over shooting the first 500m. There is a stronger
signal at 200m, but the peak is so narrow that it can’t fill up the hole between 200 and 500m. This
cell will likely experience coverage holes close to the site. This behavior was also detected on ultra
high sites in Germany. Depending on the terrain (for example a site on a hill) this effect can also
happen on much lower heights. Some basic functionality of hill slope simulation is also build-in in
the Tilt-tool.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 71 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Of course the results of the simulation needs to be checked in Asset as the tool, though using the
same models as Asset, doesn’t have a terrain or clutter database incorporated.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 72 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
At this moment BASE only has 2302 micro cell cabinets capable of DCS available. In the near
future, these will be superseded with 2309 and 2109 cabinets.
Micro cells are to be used when the following three conditions are applicable in a certain area of
the network:
The k-factor is the average time a frequency can be re-used before interference starts to decrease
the network quality.
A network with an uneven structure needs a k factor of 15, a very good network requires less, like
12.
As KPN mobile uses GSM on its micro cells and on all cells on the top layer, 63/15 gives 4 TRUs
as a micro cell threshold. For Base this is 110/15=7 TRU on DCS. It is not based on E-GSM
because only DCS micro cell equipment is available.
The other factor equipment cost doesn't count much for KPN Mobile because this factor is for them
at the same amount of TRUs as resulting from the k-factor. For Base however, above the 4 TRU
2106/2206 equipment is required, needing 2 antennae per sector. This equipment is very
expensive and in Brussels in most cases only 1 antenna per sector is currently present and
possible. Therefore the threshold is set to 5 TRU in the macro cell layer.
KPN has a market penetration 3 times higher than Base. The minimum traffic average to get break-
even on a micro-cell is about 2 Erlang, The business case below shows that a micro cell will rarely
reach this point in our network.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 73 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
1000x0.15x0.05x0.05=0.375 Erl.
0.75/(0.1*0.1)≈37.5 Erl/km2
But at least 7.5 Erlang daily traffic is required to give the micro cell a pay back time of 5 year. So 4
times higher traffic density and therefore more customers are required, which is highly unlikely.
And if the capacity of the macro cell for that area is increased for 3 TRUs to 4 TRUs the capacity
increases from 14.9 Erl to 21.9 Erl, giving an additional 7 Erl capacity, for a fraction of the costs of
a micro cell.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 74 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
6 Appendices
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 75 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
6.3 Traffic, congestion, blocking and the use of the Erlang B table
This appendix describes how the allowed amount of traffic handled by a TRU can be calculated.
The unit of traffic is the Erlang (E or Erl) and is determined as one connection on a single line for a
period of one hour.
In the analogue world without multiplexing, this is also the maximum what one line can have for
during one hour.
If a number of people try to use the same line, without multiplexing, there is a certain chance that
the line is already occupied. The chance for a person being able to use the line will decrease when
there are more people sharing the connection and also decreases when the average calling time
per person increases.
The Erlang B table shows this chance for the case where there is no waiting queue implemented
(see also information after Table 39), as is the case in GSM.
In the above case, with the help of the Erlang B table it can be calculated that when there are 3
persons during one hour each want to make a phone call of 5 minutes on one line the chance they
succeed in this is:
3 x5
= 0.25 Erl
60
As can be seen from Table 39 below this can be translated into a chance of 20%, which is the
chance for one out of 3 callers of finding their one shared line congested.
In a network situation, as is the case for a site, it’s the other way around. The available amount of
connection lines is set, the acceptable congestion is known, and the operator wants to know what
amount of customers the site can handle.
For BASE the acceptable congestion is 2%, for a sector with 2 TRUs the number of connection
possibilities is 2x8 timeslots minus 2 for the BCCH, gives 14 traffic channels. Together this means
that 8.2 Erl can be handled by this sector.
If the average generated traffic per customer in that area is 0.01 Erl and 10% of the people living in
the covered area of this sector, this sector can have 8200 customers.
The standard 2% traffic values are, as can be seen from the table below:
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 76 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 77 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Where:
• The number of customers is much larger than the number of resources available to service
them. In general, the formula gives acceptable results if the number of customers is at least 10
times the total number of resources (N).
• Requests from customers are independent of each other. This formula does not work if
customer requests have been triggered by some common event like calling a talk show,
natural calamity etc.
• Customer requests are blocked only when no resources are available to service them.
• When a customer cannot be serviced, the resource request is simply rejected. No attempt is
made to queue the customer request.
• The customer does not retry the request after being denied service. (the customer would in
effect, himself be forming a queue.)
• The resource is allocated exclusively to one customer for the specified period. The resource
cannot be shared with other customers. (so the Erlang B table doesn't apply to calculate
GPRS congestion chance with)
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 78 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Of course this formula doesn't take near-field antenna behavior into account, which is much harder
to calculate. This formula is therefore only an approximation. The formula for vertical isolation is
derived similarly, but because of the vertical positioning in near field antenna gain cannot be
approximated in the same way, thus resulting in a formula without specific antenna gain taken into
account.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 79 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
The use of TMA is that it amplifies the uplink signal before the feeder cable weakens it.
This needs to be done before because of the influence of thermal noise.
NP = −174 + 10 xLog (B )
B = Bandwidth in Hz
The bandwidth can be explained as the frequency band the system 'listens' to. The larger the
range, the more noise power is received.
The movement of electrons in atoms causes thermal noise. At 0 Kelvin electrons don't move and
therefore cause no noise at that temperature.
For E-GSM and DCS the signal bandwidth is 200 kHz, but the actual bandwidth of the filters is 250
kHz. The noise power received by the BTS is therefore -120 dBm.
To be able to retrieve the wanted information from the received signal, the quality of the retrievable
information correlates to the amount it is stronger than the noise. The higher the signal to noise
ratio becomes, the smaller the BER (bit error rate) will be. For 1% raw BER this is 7 dB. Also the
coding scheme, fading and accepted sound quality influences this.
Apart from this, the equipment adds noise to the signal as well.
NF = Rx sensitivity − NP − C / N ratio
NF = −110 − (−120) − 7 = 3
This means that, theoretically, a sensitivity of -113 dBm is possible, if the equipment itself doesn't
add noise. This is impossible, in practice about 1.5 is the minimum, but also the jumper cable
between antenna and TMA adds noise, so the sensitivity becomes about -111 dBm and not -122
dBm.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 80 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Latitude: Longitude:
Created By
RF Designer: Phone: Power_supply
Frame agr.: Class code:
Cabinet_number 01 02
IP-B
Cabinettype
PSU amount
TX-B (CE) HW installed
TX-B (CE) SW activated
RAX-B (CE) HW installed
RAX-B (CE) SW activated
2 Mbps
Sector_id 1 2 3 1 2 3
MCPA type
Carriers installed
Carriers active
MCPA mode
ASC
RET
Antenna_height
Antenna_azimuth
Antenna_type
Antenna_electrical downtilt
Antenna_mechanical tilt
Feedertype
Feederlength
− The cabinets will be ordered in bulk with standard configurations. When traffic grids and traffic
growth become available, internal cabinet boards will be customized during ordering, but
hardware/software capacity adaptations will be done after installation.
− During phase 1 and 2 quite likely only one UMTS Node-B will be required per site, but the data
input systems will be prepared for two.
− For C&I only the type of cabinet, indoor or outdoor, will be of interest from the cabinet data on
the BSDS.
− The feeder type and feeder length are used for preliminary calculation by RF and are agreed to
during TR.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 81 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
Site_Identity
Cabinet_number 01 02
Sector_id 1 2 3 1 2 3
Feedertype
Feederlength
Cable loss UL Node-B-> ASC Feeder Branch 1 (at 1943 MHz) dB
Cable loss DL Node-B-> ASC Feeder Branch 1 (at 2133 MHz) dB
Time delay Node-B-> ASC Feeder Branch 1 ns
Jumper length ASC->Antenna
Cable loss UL ASC-> Antenna jumper Branch 1 (at 1943 MHz) dB
Cable loss DL ASC-> Antenna jumper Branch 1 (at 2133 MHz) dB
Time delay ASC-> Antenna jumper Branch 1 ns
Cable loss UL Node-B-> ASC Feeder Branch 2 (at 1943 MHz) dB
Cable loss DL Node-B-> ASC Feeder Branch 2 (at 2133 MHz) dB
Time delay Node-B-> ASC Feeder Branch 2 ns
Jumper length ASC->Antenna
Cable loss UL ASC-> Antenna jumper Branch 2 (at 1943 MHz) dB
Cable loss DL ASC-> Antenna jumper Branch 2 (at 2133 MHz) dB
Time delay ASC-> Antenna jumper Branch 2 ns
Only Quadrant jumpers are allowed !
If standard 1 m and 1,5 m jumpers are used between ASC and Antenna, these values can be used:
Jumper length 1 1,5 meter
Total Jumper attenuation Rx/UL 0,36 0,44 dB
Total Jumper attenuation Tx/DL 0,37 0,45 dB
Total elektrical delay 4,07 6,1 ns
Table 41: C&I cable data deliverables
Feeders should respect the same VSWR requirements as used for DCS
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 82 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
7 Explanations
4,5
4
Antenna feeder branch loss (dB)
3,5
2,5
1,5
0,5
0
10 12,5 15 17,5 20 22,5 25 27,5 30 32,5 35 37,5 40 42,5 45 47,5 50 52,5 55 57,5 60 62,5 65 67,5 70 72,5 75 77,5 80
Antenna feeder branch length (m)
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 83 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
According to ETSI GSM 05.05 is the spurious emission from a GSM/DCS TRU smaller than -30
dBm in a 3 MHz bandwidth. As the effective UMTS noise bandwidth is 4 MHz, this represents -28.8
dBm of in-band noise.
The noise figure of UMTS the UMTS receiver is determined by the ASC, which is 2 dB, as the
uplink gain of the ASC is 30 dB.
As a result of this, the noise floor of the UMTS receiver becomes -106 dBm.
When 0.4 dB degradation is accepted, this translates into 10 dB below noise floor, so smaller than
-116 dBm.
The required isolation between E-GSM/DCS and UMTS now becomes -116-(-28.8) = -87 dB
This is to be provided by 2-9 from the list above.
Effectively there are 2 cases. The first one is CDU-A, the second one is CDU-C+
As DCS, CDU-C+ is worst case, this is used in calculation.
2. Combiner loss 5dB
3. Duplex filter: 30-35 dB
4. Typically 3 dB
5. No TMA, so 0 dB
6. No jumper from TMA to antenna needed
7. Isolation between 2 antenna sections in a 742241: >38 dB
8. Jumper loss from antenna to ASC: 0.2 dB
9. ASC insertion loss: 0.2 dB
So effectively 76.4-81.4 dB per TRU is provided and 87dB is needed when no TMA is used.
This is about 5-10 dB loss too few per TRU. Ericsson specifies however, that the spurious
emission is sufficiently lower than the GSM ETSI requirement that this is fulfilled, even when the
antenna isolation is only 30 dB.
This is however, not guaranteed when the UMTS antenna is installed in the vicinity of another
operator.
7.4 IM3 & IM5 issues when UMTS is co-located with E-GSM/DCS
These cannot occur from BASE to BASE (in the FDD band we will currently deploy, deployment of
the TDD band is not foreseen yet). IM3 & IM5 are possible from DCS to UMTS block A from
Proximus if antennae would be shared. This should therefore not be done. The IM3 levels will also
need to be investigated on indoor equipment (fiber and coax repeaters etc).IM3 and IM5
These are the UMTS band licenses of several operators.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 84 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
A consequence of our frequency range is that, due to our downlink band, IM3 products might be
generated in the UMTS band of Proximus when antennae would be installed too close (or shared).
2.5m horizontally (or 1.5m if antennae point in the same direction) and 0.5m vertically can be
considered to be safe.
DCS of this antenna has a problem, because the overall downlink will be stronger than the uplink
up to almost 12dB. The TMA is not able to compensate that as can be read in section 6.6.
16
11
1
1710
350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1800
1880
-4
-9
-14
-19
Figure 45: Thales 1661 gain versus frequency and vertical angle in the DCS band
As you can see below, Racal has concentrated on the GSM behavior, expecting the antenna
mainly to be used in a network where DCS is build only for capacity on top of a already coverage
filled GSM layer, because this is not too bad. With Kathrein antennae, they show up almost as one
line!
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document
Development Page : 85 of 85
RF Design Guidelines Revision : R
UMTS, DCS & E-GSM Date : 1-06-05
16
11
350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
870
-4 910
960
-9
-14
-19
-24
Figure 46: Thales 1661 gain versus frequency and vertical angle in the E-GSM band
The same applies for the horizontal pattern: Acceptable for GSM (not shown), but substandard for
DCS (see below). The optimum direction is not even at the same angle.
16
14
12
10
1710
1800
1880
8
2
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141
Figure 47: Thales 1661 gain versus frequency and horizontal angle in the DCS band
So, as you can understand the disadvantages of using these antennae are significant, but it's
either this or no E-GSM for configuration 6 and 85º sites in the South.
May 2005: Still no alternative for the Racal 1661.
Prepared by: RF Engineering & Optimisation (Eric Noordanus) File: RF GUIDELINES 2005 rev R.doc
Approved by: Rene Pluijmers Company confidential document