Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B2B or B2C Dilemma in Maintenance Industry: Urbankare: Rajeev Verma, G.K. Murthy Kothapalli Ranjani Kumari
B2B or B2C Dilemma in Maintenance Industry: Urbankare: Rajeev Verma, G.K. Murthy Kothapalli Ranjani Kumari
industry: UrbanKare
Rajeev Verma, G.K. Murthy Kothapalli and Ranjani Kumari
DOI 10.1108/EEMCS-12-2019-0328 VOL. 10 NO. 4 2020, pp. 1-25, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 2045-0621 j EMERALD EMERGING MARKETS CASE STUDIES j PAGE 1
customer was forced to call the service provider again, within days and the cycle
repeated!). One of the respondents, Vibha Singh, said, “it’s very difficult to find local service
providers at the time of requirement: the experienced (and thus popular) ones are too hard-
pressed for time while the rookies may be easily available but I cannot trust them.”
The research also revealed that for a business customer while price was not always the
overriding consideration, predictability and consistency of a professional service provider
were, given the long-term nature of the engagement. Said Rahul (project associate at
Software Technology Parks of India (STPI) [2], Patna), a business customer, “most of the
independent local service providers are unreliable and unprofessional: they hardly value
your time; further, once you do engage one, you must personally oversee their work, full-
time (which is a drain on your precious time), to ensure they don’t botch, and you get your
money’s worth.” Upon discovering the needs and pain points of customers, the duo hit
upon the idea of establishing a marketplace that could connect customers with service
providers, while addressing the former’s pain points. Kumar said that though service
providers were available in large numbers, there were gaping holes in the quality of service
provided. He added that the industry was largely unorganized and presented them with an
opportunity. The primary motivation for setting up the firm was thus to bring professionalism
to an industry where it was sorely lacking.
UrbanKare was currently serving both residential and business markets, with a focus on five
key services: painting (exterior and interior walls), interior design, modular kitchens, mural
art and electrician services. They also offered integrated solutions (total building renovation)
combining most or all of these services. Three building renovation contracts were currently
underway – two in the residential market (for one domestic customer and another, a non-
resident Indian) and one in the business/government market (for a department of the
Government of Bihar) – ranging from ‘2,500,000 ($34,000) to ‘5,000,000 ($68,000) in
value2. Integrated solutions, however, typified the B2B market, whereas most orders from
the B2C market concerned plumbing and minor electrical jobs. The firm witnessed steady
growth in revenue since its inception in the year 2015 (Exhibit 1). However, a couple of
important statistics made it imperative for UrbanKare to choose between residential and
business markets so as to avoid spreading itself too thin – and pursue growth: orders from
the B2C market currently accounted for 95% of total, with an average ticket size of $9.5,
while those from the business-to-business (B2B) market accounted for the remaining 5%,
with an average ticket size of $325. While UrbanKare was currently a regional player with
operations in a few smaller cities like Patna and Ranchi, most of its competitors –
UrbanCompany (more on this later) for instance – were active and strongly positioned in the
larger cities of India. As the firm was keen on expanding its operations beyond its home
state of Bihar – and the neighboring state of Jharkhand – Kumar had to make an informed
decision on the market to target – B2C or B2B – that made better sense, from operational,
financial and strategic perspectives.
Company background
Upon observing the absence of reliability and professionalism among independent service
providers (e.g. plumbers, electricians, carpenters, painters, repairmen and interior
designers), Swati and Kumar found a gap in the market of unorganized repair and
maintenance services industry. Their research into the needs, wants, pain points and
decision-making process of customers revealed interesting insights. For instance, service
providers were largely self-taught, rarely punctual and extremely inconsistent in the service
fee they charged. It was not uncommon for customers to book a plumber and wait endlessly
for him to show up, as the latter would rarely turn up at the appointed time. Yet, customers in
the B2C market tended to stick, paradoxically, with their old ways of relying on the
unreliable neighborhood plumbers, partly because the latter were relatively inexpensive
compared to the ones available on the newly emerging app-based marketplaces – and
The first three categories listed above are common to both B2C and B2B markets. The on-
demand local services industry in India was growing rapidly with 69 startups founded in
2014 alone, a number that shot up to 150 in 2015 and 270 in 2017. Tracxn, a startup tracker,
estimated that this highly unorganized market held an opportunity ranging from $100bn to
$400bn.
The number of startups in this space rose dramatically since 2012 and most of them
targeted the B2C market. However, a majority of them had either been acquired by bigger
rivals or folded up, unable to raise funds and scale up quickly to be able to achieve
profitability in a fiercely competitive and low-margin business. The fragmented market,
witnessing a wave of consolidation, included the following major players, to name a few, in
early 2020: UrbanClap, HouseJoy, HomeTriangle and UrbanPro. UrbanClap, founded in
2014 and backed by SAIF Partners, among others, grew into India’s largest and fastest-
growing local services startup with an FY 2018–2019 gross revenue of $16.5m and an
operating loss of $9.7m. UrbanClap was renamed UrbanCompany in Jan. 2020 [6] and
currently had operations in India, Australia, Singapore and the UAE. As of January-end
2020, UrbanCompany had 25,000 trained professional service providers onboard across
the four countries and had served five million households. The firm worked closely with its
service partners and helped them with up-skilling, financing, insurance and product
procurement, effectively turning them into micro-service entrepreneurs.
HouseJoy was founded in 2015, was backed by Amazon, among others, and acquired a
number of smaller rivals including MyWash, a provider of on-demand laundry services
online. One of the earliest startups, Zimmber, acquired a couple of smaller rivals, including
FindYahan, between 2015 and 2016 – and, in turn, was acquired by the online classified
advertising platform Quickr in 2017 for $10m and was subsequently renamed QuickrEasy.
Another startup, Near.in, was acquired by Paytm, the mobile payment solutions provider
that subsequently branched out into e-commerce, in 2015 for $2m.
As per the latest census of 2011, India had a population of 1.2 billion, with 330 million
households. The decadal population growth rate (2001–2011) was 17.64%, which would
lead to a significant growth in the number of households, offering an opportunity to
organized, on-demand maintenance service providers [7]. The number of inquiries,
confirmed orders, and repeat orders rose steadily across platforms; the repeat purchase
volume as a share of the total order volume was estimated to be between 25% and 30%.
The number of inquiries received by UrbanKare per day is shown in Exhibit 4. With the
rapidly growing penetration of smartphones in India, demand was set to rise sharply [8]. As
the core customer value proposition of startups in this space was to provide quick and
reliable service, service partners played a pivotal role in the success of a firm, which was
essentially a marketplace that connected customers and service providers. It was thus
imperative for a marketplace to have an adequate number of carefully-screened,
background-checked, trained and skilled service providers onboard.
Revenue model
Customer orders were broadly of two types: standard and customized; UrbanKare’s pricing
varied with the type of order. For standard orders such as plumbing, electrical jobs or
appliance repair, a service fee was charged at standard rates based on the nature of the
task and a fixed ‘visit charge’ was added. The firm collected a flat 20% commission on the
order value after each successfully executed order while the rest went to the service
provider. Customized orders such as painting, interior design, modular kitchen and total
building renovation, on the other hand, were priced on a cost-plus pricing basis with a 25%
markup. For a customer, one of the major advantages offered by the on-demand
maintenance services marketplaces such as UrbanKare was standard, transparent and
consistent prices: providers in the unorganized market often charged arbitrary and
inconsistent prices, and even took advantage of peak demand (for instance, painting
during festivals) and jacked up prices dramatically.
Booking a service
To book a service, a customer had to visit the website (www.urbankare.in) or download the
mobile app available on Google Play store or visit the online business directory JustDial
(justdial.com) and look UrbanKare up. Alternatively, they could just telephone the firm.
Offering customers four channels to access the service was the norm in the industry. Once
on the website or app, a customer could check the rate card, select the required service,
and go through the terms and conditions of availing services. After booking a service, a
unique booking ID was generated. Multiple payment options were made available. Upon
successful execution of the order, they could offer feedback on the quality of service,
including the behavior of the service provider.
Payment
Once a customer booked a service on the app/website, the fee payable was computed by
software and reflected on screen. Most of the payments were made using digital payment
modes including e-wallets such as Paytm [10] on the website and the app, while a few
customers preferred cash payment (Exhibit 7).
Marketing strategies
UrbanKare logo and the tagline
The logo of UrbanKare (Exhibit 8), with all its colours, symbolized vibrancy – characteristic
of the customers’ lives and the structures (homes and offices) they lived and worked in –
and, through the tool (the wrench in the lower half of the logo), also represented the nature
of services provided. The K in ‘Kare,’ which was sharp in the earlier version of the logo, had
been stylized to look like K, as well as C, both for clarity sake and as an assurance to
customers: we are here to take care of your buildings and keep them looking new. The
tagline, “Don’t worry, Kaam ho jaayega [11],” sought to reassure customers of certain,
timely and professional execution of their orders.
Digital marketing
UrbanKare relied primarily on digital channels and word of mouth for promotion: it used
Facebook, Instagram and YouTube as major media platforms to promote its services.
Search engine optimization was also used. The firm’s Facebook page had over 2,000
followers. Digital channels helped UrbanKare connect and engage with prospects and
customers. The founders believed that a satisfied customer was always their most powerful
brand ambassador [12].
Key differentiator
Internet-of-things-based projects and cloud-based design interventions
In 2017, the firm launched IoT-based interior decoration and cloud-based designing
interventions for their customers.
The IoT is a suite of technologies and applications that equip devices and locations to
generate all kinds of information – and to connect those devices and locations for instant
data analysis and, ideally, “smart” action. Conceptually, the IoT implies physical objects
being able to use the internet backbone to communicate data about their condition, position
or other attributes [13].
The IoT brought smart devices into homes and offices. As the market for interior design was
growing rapidly, the industry was also adopting IoT with terms such as “Iterior” (“IoT-based
Interiors”). UrbanKare disrupted the industry with IoT-based interior decoration and cloud-
based designing interventions. They provided trendy smart lighting systems to homes and
offices that were connected to mobile phones and tablets. UrbanKare aimed to make
homes and offices aesthetically appealing, relaxing and easier to use, with the help of IoT,
in which customers could turn on/off lights with Wi-Fi or an air-conditioner with a
smartphone.
Customer segments
Based on the nature of service required, UrbanKare divided its customers into two
segments, namely, individual consumers (B2C or consumer market) who booked services
for their homes and B2B customers such as business houses and government departments
that required major services like renovation and painting of the offices, AC repair and
maintenance of the whole office. Generally, B2C customers’ inquiries came through the
app, website and the business directory (JustDial), whereas business customers tended to
contact the firm via telephone with their inquiries and follow it up with a face-to-face
interaction to take it forward. Most of the B2B inquiries resulted from referrals by existing
customers who had availed a service recently. Word of mouth thus played a greater role in
lead generation in B2B sales.
Key challenges
Aggregation of independent providers: matching demand and supply
As a marketplace that connected customers and independent service providers,
UrbanKare faced the challenge of identifying, screening, background-checking, on-
boarding, training and retaining service providers, most of whom had never received a
decent education, let alone formal training. Coming as they did from an unorganized sector,
most of these providers needed a radical transformation to fit into the professional
environment of UrbanKare where responsiveness, punctuality, reliability, courtesy and
physical appearance (neat and tidy at work) were critical to success. Further, as the firm
was growing rapidly, it needed an ever expanding team of service partners. UrbanKare was
Customer retention
Another unique challenge facing UrbanKare – just as any other gig economy enterprise,
indeed – was retaining customers. A customer who had availed a plumbing service through
UrbanKare, for instance, would contact the same provider directly the next time, bypassing
the firm. Providers tended to oblige, and even encourage, such requests in a bid to pocket
the 20% commission that would otherwise go to the marketplace.
Building awareness
Despite radio and transit advertising, below-the-line activities such as participating in an
exhibition of women entrepreneurs’ products and an active digital media presence
(Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Google search), brand awareness was quite low. The
firm needed to boost awareness significantly, and quickly, if it were to capitalize on the
opportunity presented by the near absence of established players in this part of the country
(major players such as UrbanCompany were active in the larger cities of Delhi, Mumbai,
Bangalore, etc.), and build on the initial momentum, before setting sights on the larger cities
and eventually emerge as a national player.
Urbankare 2.0
The marketplace that began with a few mundane services in its portfolio – the services of
plumbers, electricians, and (air-conditioner) repairmen – had come a long way, with
innovative services such as mechanized painting and IoT-based interior designing. Being a
pioneer in the aggregation of maintenance service providers, at least in this part of the
country (the eastern states of Bihar and Jharkhand) – and an early adopter of technology,
UrbanKare was certainly a disruptor. Buoyed by the early success resulting from the
adoption of these technologies, Kumar was ambitious and determined to propel his startup
into the high-growth path.
Notes
1. The apex body of women entrepreneurs in India.
2. US$1 = ‘74.07 (as on Mar. 17, 2020).
3. https://rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressREleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=27047
4. An Indian art form.
5. Vidya Padmanabhan, “Home maintenance goes corporate,” www.livemint.com/Companies/vUFt6o
N7WB26hqnH9ccPyO/Home-maintenance-goes-corporate.html, 6th February 2012.
6. “UrbanClap rebrands itself as Urban Company,” https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/
startups/newsbuzz/urbanclap-rebrands-itself-as-urban-company/articleshow/73767776.cms, 30th
January 2020.
7. http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/india/paper_contentsetc.pdf
8. Team INC 42, “The Indian Home Services Startups Are Killing It – Decoding The $100 Bn
Opportunity,” https://inc42.com/buzz/decoding-100-billion-home-services-marketplaces/ 6th
August 2015.
9. Company sources.
10. An Indian mobile payment services provider.
11. Translation: “(Don’t worry), consider it done.”
12. Company sources
13. “The IoT: A technical primer,” www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/internet-of-things/technical-
primer.html?icid=dcom_promo_featuredjus;en, 8th February 2018.
14. “Internet users to reach 627 million by end of 2019: Kantar IMRB report,” www.afaqs.com/news/
story/54591_Internet-users-to-reach-627-million-by-end-of-2019-Kantar-IMRB-report
15. “Smart Home Market in India growing steadily,” www.mobilityindia.com/smart-home-market-in-
india-growing-steadily/, 27th July 2017.
16. “UrbanClap rebrands itself as Urban Company,” https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/
startups/newsbuzz/urbanclap-rebrands-itself-as-urban-company/articleshow/73767776.cms, 30th
January 2020.
Table E1
Particulars 2016–2017 2017–2018 2018–2019
Figure E1
Figure E2
Table E2
Type of channel & cost Lead (B2C) Lead (B2B)
Website 65 5
UrbanKare app 9 0
Personal relations 5 0
BTL advertisement 7 0
Word of mouth 6 0
Just dial 30 3
Total 122 8
Source: Company sources (updated as on January 2020)
Figure E3
Figure E4
Figure E5
Figure E6
Prof G.K. Murthy Kothapalli is an academician par excellence and having more than 15
years of experience in teaching courses ranging from Retail Management to Branding and
consumer behavior.
Ms Ranjini Kumari is an academic scholar currently pursuing PhD in the area of Marketing
Management. She is a UGC NET qualified research scholar and having rich experience of
writing academic cases.
Synopsis
Consumer preferences in India were changing rapidly, aided by the rising participation of
women in the workforce and the consequent jump in household incomes. As the
socioeconomic status of households were increasing, families were becoming dual income
wherein both male and female partners used to contribute into the economic activities. With
this, they generally did not have time to manage their household repair and maintenance
works. Some assistance was required to maintain their household works such as repair,
maintenance and cleaning of the homes. This proved the old saying by John Ray, “where
there’s muck there’s money.” The latest industry to capitalize on this opportunity was the
maintenance industry. Repair and maintenance services were starting to go corporate. The
trends in organizing or corporatizing this unorganized services sector was prompted by
the anticipation of increasing disposable incomes of India’s burgeoning middle class.
The on-demand local (maintenance) services industry in India was growing rapidly with 69
startups founded in 2014 alone, a number that shot up to 150 in 2015 and 270 in 2017.
Tracxn, a startup tracker, estimated that this highly unorganized market held an opportunity
ranging from $100bn to $400bn. These service providers were providing safe, reliable
services with complete professionalism and competitive pricing with the unorganized
service provider. Along with this the smart homes decoration demand was also growing
very rapidly, in 2019 only the revenue generated through smart homes was US $1,691. And
it was expected to grow at the rate of 43.6% CAGR, while average revenue per installed
Smart Homes was US$58.18. This indicates future potential of this growing sector.
The number of startups in this space rose dramatically since 2012 and most of them
targeted the B2C market. However, a majority of them had either been acquired by bigger
rivals or folded up, unable to raise funds and scale up quickly to be able to achieve
profitability in a fiercely competitive and low-margin business. The fragmented market,
witnessing a wave of consolidation, included the following major players, to name a few, in
early 2020: UrbanClap, HouseJoy, HomeTriangle and UrbanPro. UrbanClap, founded in
2014 and backed by SAIF Partners, among others, grew into India’s largest and fastest-
growing local services startup with an FY 2018–2019 gross revenue of $16.5m and an
operating loss of $9.7m. UrbanClap was renamed UrbanCompany in Jan. 2020 [16] and
currently had operations in India, Australia, Singapore and the UAE. As of January-end
2020, UrbanCompany had 25,000 trained professional service providers onboard across
the four countries and had served five million households. The firm worked closely with its
service partners and helped them with up-skilling, financing, insurance and product
procurement, effectively turning them into micro-service entrepreneurs.
The present case is about the entrepreneurial journey of Miss Swati Anand and Mr
Balkishun Kumar, founder of UrbanKare Internet Pvt. Ltd. a maintenance service
aggregator, which initially started their maintenance service business by organizing the
service solutions from local market and training them to make them professional and
reliable. Initially, they started with the jobs such as plumbing, repairing and maintenance of
ACs and electrician works. Although, being from engineering background both of the
founders had strong inclination toward applying IT and other network technologies into the
business. Mr Balkishun wanted to mechanize and automate household painting and interior
works. They launched their own app, website and used mechanism such as SEO and other
IT technology to expand their business. In 2017, they also started providing IoT-based
home decoration services. They provided maintenance services which can be booked
using website, by calling at the company’s call center or by the login into the app. They
were also working very well with the B2B market such as government offices and other
private organizations. To share, company was using only BTL promotion medium such as
participating in fairs, digital marketing with Facebook, SEO, Instagram, website and
android app. They also used methods like distributing pamphlet, road shows and word-of-
mouth publicity for advertising their business.
The founders were in dilemma whether they should move completely into the B2B customer
segment (large token size, small volume) or they should be still working with the small
maintenance works with which they started with the B2C segment (small token size, large
volume). They were facing the issues like how they should be managing the growth while
Learning objectives
This case offers different avenues for overall learning, which can be discussed with
students in detail to have a comprehensive understanding of entrepreneurship and new
evolving trends in the market:
䊏 To understand drivers of changing customer preferences that leads to the evolution of
innovative business models.
䊏 To describe the network aggregator business model for service provision, highlight its
unique features and make students understand the role of automation in the
maintenance industry.
䊏 To describe the key challenges and opportunities associated with B2B and B2C
business models.
䊏 To analyze B2B and B2C business models with reference to the resource capabilities of
the firm.
䊏 To differentiate stakeholders’ skills and business capabilities required in B2B vs B2C
business models.
Research methodology
This case study is fairly exhaustive and comprehensive study of the subjected organization
“UrbanKare Internet Pvt. Ltd,” wherein detailed and complete observation of the
protagonist, as well as their contextual and situational surrounding has been documented.
The research questions of the case study are directly linked with the real-world problem
faced by the protagonist. The author has carefully framed all research questions after an
extensive literature review to ensure that these questions are clearly formulated, narrow and
researchable.
The authors have made all the efforts to collect primary data using preliminary intensive
investigation techniques. Direct interviews have been recorded with the founders of the
enterprise and the customers (with random and snowball sample) and non-customers of
the services. To avoid the issue of observer bias, the authors have analyzed the research
questions at different levels of analysis (firm and individual). Finally, generalizations and
inferences are drawn after establishing relationships between the case study objectives
and case study research questions.
Teaching plan
The case has been designed to be discussed in 75–90 min session in the class, and the
discussion should be divided into different topics, as presented below. The order in which
these topics have been arranged is just suggestive and the instructor may follow and order
of sequence as per their own interest. The instructor may frame questions in a manner to
cover the majority of the case topics while ensuring a smooth transition from one block to
next (Table 1):
Relevant readings
The following suggested readings (text and research papers) on aggregator-based
business model, IoT and IT-based businesses, B2B and B2C business comparison,
managing customer relationships.
Text books
1. Zeithaml, V., Bitner, M., & Gremler, D. (2009). Services Marketing: Integrating
Customer Focus across the Firm, 5th ed.., McGraw-Hill Irwin.
2. Hutt, & Speh, Latest (Ed.), Business Marketing Management: B2B, Cengage
Publishing.
Research articles
3. Saha, S. K., Aman, A., Hossain, M.S., Islam, A., & Sarder Rodela, R. (2014). A
Comparative Study on B2B vs. B2C Based on Asia Pacific Region, International
Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 3(9), ISSN 2277-8616.
4. Alstyne, M., Van, W., Parker, G.G., & Choudary, S.P. (2016), Pipelines, platforms,
and the new rules of strategy, April Issue, Harvard Business Review.
5. . Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2019), Why some platforms thrive and other don’t, Harvard
Business Review.
6. Iankova, S., Davies, I., Archer-Brown, C., Marder, B., & Yau, A. (2018). A
Comparison of Social Media Marketing between B2B, B2C and Mixed Business
Models//Industrial Marketing Management, doi: 10.1016/j. indmarman.2018.01.001.
7. Boksberger, P.E., & Melsen, L. (2011). Perceived Value: A Critical Examination of
Definitions, Concepts and Measures for the Service Industry, Journal of Services
Marketing, 25(3). 229–240.
8. Corsaro, D., Ramos, C., & Henneberg, S. C. (2012). The Impact of Network
Configurations on Value Constellations in Business Markets—The Case of an
Innovation Network, Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 54–67.
9. Menon, A., Homburg, C., Beutin, N. (2005) ‘Understanding Customer Value in
Business-to-Business Relationships’, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 12
(2): 1–35.
10. Mencarelli, R., & Rivière, A. (2014). Perceived value in B2B and B2C: A comparative
approach and cross-fertilization. Marketing Theory, Retrieved from: https://doi.org/
10.1177/1470593114552581