Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib Device Insertion: Does It Improve Pulmonary Function?
Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib Device Insertion: Does It Improve Pulmonary Function?
www.elsevier.com/locate/jpedsurg
⁎ Corresponding author. Department of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. Tel.: +1 734
764 4151; fax: +1 734 936 9784.
E-mail address: samirg@med.umich.edu (S.K. Gadepalli).
0022-3468/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.09.070
78 S.K. Gadepalli et al.
Conclusion: There was mild improvement in scoliosis angles but no improvement in lung function and
volume. Scoliosis Research Society scores indicate that the children have near normal function both
before and after VEPTR placement. Pulmonary function, lung volume, and patient subjective
assessments did not increase dramatically after VEPTR placement, although scoliosis angles improved.
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
In patients with congenital scoliosis, an alternative to with an average age of 91 months, underwent 29 insertions
early spinal fusion to prevent a worsening curve is expansion (21 bilateral) and 57 expansions. The patients were also
thoracoplasty using vertical expandable prosthetic titanium evenly grouped above and below 84 months or 7 years of
rib (VEPTR; Synthes Spine Co, West Chester, Pa) insertion age. The patients were categorized into 4 diagnoses
and serial lengthening, first described in 1989 [1]. Other (congenital or infantile scoliosis, Jeune syndrome, neuro-
indications for VEPTR insertion have later been introduced muscular scoliosis, and unspecified structural thoracic
including thoracic insufficiency syndrome [2,3], where disorder). Almost half of these patients had congenital or
abnormal thoracic structure affects lung development, infantile scoliosis (12), whereas the other half was mostly
limiting a patient's functional capacity. Although designed split between neuromuscular scoliosis (5) and unspecified
to increase the thoracic volume and lung growth, VEPTR structural thoracic disorder (7). Only 2 patients with Jeune
insertion has failed to show improvement using pulmonary syndrome comprised our VEPTR experience.
function tests (PFTs) in short-term follow-up [2,4-6]. Outcome measures included PFT preoperatively and every
As useful adjuncts to PFTs, 3-dimensional reconstructions 6 months in all patients (12) who were not ventilator-dependent
of thoracic CT scans (3DCTR) can be used to evaluate lung and can cooperate with the procedure, lung volumes in patients
volumes after thoracic spinal reconstruction procedures [7]. who consented to 3DCTR preoperatively and yearly (10), a
Using a combination of 3DCTR and PFT values, preoperative modified SRS-22 questionnaire, and scoliosis angles measured
and postoperative changes can be carefully monitored to preoperatively and at each postoperative visit in all patients,
determine the effect of VEPTR insertion on pulmonary with 23 of 26 patients having adequate follow-up for analysis
function. Improvements in ventilation after VEPTR insertion, of these values. To measure scoliosis angles, standing PA and
especially in younger patients, have been described using VQ lateral spine radiographs were obtained. The Cobb measure-
scans [8], although studies using 3DCTR are limited. ment was obtained from the largest curve preoperatively,
Quality of life variables however do not always reflect the postoperatively, and at final follow-up. The mean Cobb angle
changes seen on these objective measures; therefore, a measurement was calculated and compared at the different
functional survey was created and refined by the Scoliosis periods. In addition, the lengths of stay, complication rates
Research Society (SRS) [9,10]. The SRS questionnaire including return to operating room, PFT results, and lung
measures a patient's subjective self-assessment in the volumes by 3DCTR were compared among sex, age, and
following areas: function, pain, self-image, mental health, diagnoses groups.
and satisfaction. In this report, we present outcomes after SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) was used to analyze
VEPTR insertion and lengthening in our experience, from a all data; and Student t test, analysis of variance, and χ2
prospectively collected database, including complications, analyses were performed with P b .05 considered significant.
changes in scoliosis angles, PFT, volumes from 3DCTR, and
results of a modified SRS questionnaire.
3. Results
2. Methods The 29 VEPTR insertions averaged 6.72 days in the
hospital postoperatively, including 2.72 days in the ICU,
A prospectively collected database was established to whereas the 57 lengthening procedures averaged 2.44 days in
follow patients with placement of VEPTR device after the hospital, including 0.26 days in the ICU. In all, 36
institutional review board approval. Vertical expandable complications occurred with 22 of 36 treated nonoperatively:
prosthetic titanium rib insertion was performed by a pediatric 3 transfusions for bleeding, 6 infections treated with
surgeon and orthopedic surgeon acting in conjunction using antibiotics, 9 neurologic (pain or numbness), 2 hardware
a thoracotomy for placement of the device. Subsequent dislodgements, and 2 pleural effusions. Reoperation was
lengthening procedures were performed serially at an required in 4 for chest tube placement (pneumothorax), 1 for
average of 6 months from the previous procedure. seroma drainage, 6 for hardware removal (for infection), and
A total of 26 patients (16 male and 10 female) underwent 3 for hardware repositioning (for dislodgement).
86 procedures between October 2006 and March 2010 at the No statistical difference was noted between preoperative
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Mich. The patients, and postoperative values of the pulmonary outcomes for PFT
Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib device insertion 79
[7] Gollogly S, Smith J, White S, et al. The volume of lung parenchyma as I also wondered about your complication rate because
a function of age: a review of 1050 normal CT scans of the chest with that seemed relatively high compared to other series that
three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of the pulmonary system.
have been reported. I was wondering how much
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2061-6.
[8] Waldhausen J, Redding G, Song K. Vertical expandable prosthetic attention did you pay to nutritional management
titanium rib for thoracic insufficiency syndrome: a new method to treat preoperatively so that you had adequate skin and soft
an old problem. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:76-80. tissue coverage?
[9] Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D. Further development and validation of
the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine
Dr Gadepalli: Thank you for your questions. The first
(Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2381-6.
[10] Asher M, Lai S, Glattes R, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health- question regarding Redding and Waldhausen's data
Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain. Spine (Phila looking at the case series using VQ scans and showing
Pa 1976) 2006;31:593-7. improvement in younger children, essentially we split
[11] Dimeglio A. Growth in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop our data base into sex, age, diagnoses to see if there
2001;21:549-55.
was any difference with any of these different
[12] Samdani A, St Hilaire T, Emans J, et al. The usefulness of VEPTR in
the older child with complex spine and chest deformity. Clin Orthop modalities, and we found no difference in any of
Relat Res 2010;468:700-4. them. One problem is that the numbers become so small
[13] Caubet J, Emans J, Smith J, et al. Increased hemoglobin levels in we only had two Jeune's patients and that is the case
patients with early onset scoliosis: prevalence and effect of a treatment with Seattle as well. I contacted them to get their data. I
with Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR). Spine
think that unless you have a collaboration with several
(Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2534-6.
[14] Skaggs D, Sankar W, Albrektson J, et al. Weight gain following vertical centers you will not have enough data for Jeune's data.
expandable prosthetic titanium ribs surgery in children with thoracic
insufficiency syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2530-3. Regarding the preoperative nutritional management, all
[15] Vitale M, Matsumoto H, Roye DJ, et al. Health-related quality of life in these patients received preoperative nutrition manage-
children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28: ment in order to effectively have—I can't explain why we
239-43.
had so many complications. There is a huge learning and a
lot of our complications occurred early. I think we learned
Discussion lessons to help avoid these in the future.
Unidentified Speaker: So, if I understand, and I want to— Harsh Grewal, MD (Philadelphia, Pa)
you guys collected a lot of data here, very thorough in the Dr Grewal: Thanks for your paper. A couple of comments.
follow-up, tough group of patients, but there was really no One comment is I have been doing this for about 10 years
significant difference in any of the measured outcomes. and we have done about 150 patients. The caveat is, sort
The naïve person could look at this and ask should you be of like Dr Waldhausen mentioned, the largest group that is
doing this at all. having these inserted nationwide are scoliosis with
complex chest wall deformities, fused ribs, etc. In that
Dr Gadepalli: Actually we felt the same thing and one of the group, the reason to insert the VEPTR is not to improve
thoughts that we had was it is possible we missed any lung function. It is to correct the scoliosis and the chest
significant variables and we would collect these for a while wall deformity without fusing the spine, because these are
longer and see if maybe this was a type B error. The other growing kids. I think the question asked then is not really
possibility is that there is not any significance but since it relevant to that group. The question then is relevant to the
does improve angles we can still use these devices. We just group in which you have Jeune syndrome, for example. In
can't say it is used for lung volume improvement. The final that group, there definitely is anecdotal experience
thing would be we may be using the wrong variables to starting from when Campbell first did this procedure
measure improvement in lung function. There are some new that they come off the ventilator. The question is in that
data coming out in terms of just using weight gain or using group that are ventilator dependent that have asphyxiating
hemoglobin levels as a way of monitoring lung function. chondral dystrophies the PFTs are very inaccurate. In
fact, in almost 50% of those patients the pulmonologist
John Waldhausen, MD (Seattle, Wash) will say this PFT is not adequate. Having those two
Dr Waldhausen: If you look at the thoracic insufficiency caveats, how would you then address the question that
group, specifically the Jeune's children who were on the you asked?
ventilators, Greg Redding, who is in Seattle, a pulmonol- Thank you.
ogist, if you look at a national consortium of data, actually
shows that a lot of those kids do have improved lung Dr Gadepalli: Thank you for your comment. In terms of
function and either stabilize on the ventilator or potential Jeune's and measuring lung function over time, I think the
get off. Did you separate your data and look at those data are still unclear and we just have to wait over time
kids specifically? and see what happens.