Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HC Settlement Commission Order
HC Settlement Commission Order
HC Settlement Commission Order
.
(_s!o_ryq4vsE
NoTtcE BEFoRE ADMtsstoN)
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT'HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Between:
M/s. Green City Dukes Estates LLP, 16111623125 TRUNK ROAD NELLORE Neilore
AP 524001 lN Represented by its Authorized Signatory, Mr. Samarth Agaruval
Petitioner
AND
1. Union of lndia, represented by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of
Finance. North Block, New Delhi -1 1000'1
2. Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Wing, Central Circle-1(3),
Hyderabad Aaykar Bhawan, Opposite LB Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad -
TG 500004
3. lncome Tax Settlement Commission, Chennai Bench 640-Anna Salai Satguru
Complex Chennai.-600035
Respondents
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed
herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Ravi, Senior Counsel for M/s R.S.
ASSOCIATES for the Petitioner and Sri Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, Asst. Sollcitor
General who took notice on behalf of the Respondent NO.1 and Sri B. Narstmha
Sharma, Standing Counsel who took notice on behalf of the Respondent No.2, directed
issue of notice to the Respondent No.3 herein to show cause as to why this WRIT
PETITION should not be admitted.
You viz:
are directed to show cause on or before 12-04-2021 to which date the case stands
posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed
therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further
actions in relation to the assessment years 2r15-'l 6 to 2019-20, pending disposal of
WP No. 3181 of 2021 , on the file of the High Cburt.
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Heard Sri S,Ravi, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, who submits
thatthough Section 245C ot the lncome Tax Act, Chapter 19 still existing on the
statute book, but the 3'd respondent is not receiving the application. He submits
that just because bill is introduced that will not have enforceability of law, unless
it is passed by the Parliament and notification issued to that effect.
ln the present case nothing has happened and the statute remains on the
statute book. The 3'o respondent is obligated to receive the application as long as
the statute is valid and subsisting.
List on 12.04.2021.
SE N OFFICER
To,
DATED:1 5102120i'|.1
t,
I -'r) +
LIST ON t2-04-202r I'
I -.,
,
NOTICE BEFORE: ADMISSION
WP.No.3181 ot 2r)21
DIRECTION