Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Post Harvest Sugarcane Quality Under Manual (Whole Cane) and Mechanical (Billet) Harvesting
Post Harvest Sugarcane Quality Under Manual (Whole Cane) and Mechanical (Billet) Harvesting
Post Harvest Sugarcane Quality Under Manual (Whole Cane) and Mechanical (Billet) Harvesting
net/publication/281478913
CITATIONS READS
0 406
2 authors, including:
S. S. Datir
Queen's University
57 PUBLICATIONS 91 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by S. S. Datir on 12 February 2016.
ABSTRACT
Postharvest deterioration of cane quality due to cane staling is one of the most
alarming problems of sugar industry. Sugarcane harvesting is either manual or
mechanical and ultimately it is mandatory to provide harvested cane to the mil yard
within shortest possible time to minimize the loss of sucrose content in the juice. In
light of this, an investigation was carried out to assess the magnitude of postharvest
deterioration in sugarcane variety Co 86032 under manual (whole cane) and
Keywords mechanical (billets) harvesting under different environmental conditions i.e. from
December 2005 to April 2006. Juice quality parameters, loss in cane weight,
Postharvest, reducing sugars, and microbial count were studied in whole cane and billets for 2,
Sugarcane, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 hrs. A gradual rise in percent loss in cane weight,
Mechanical reducing sugars and microbial count with simultaneous reduction in brix, pol,
harvesting, commercial cane sugar and purity percent were observed in both types of
Billets, harvesting. The losses were more pronounced at 72 hrs as compared to 2 hrs of
Juice quality crushing in whole cane as well as in billets. Cane quality deterioration was more in
billet type of harvesting as compared to manual harvesting and was extremely
higher in March and April (summer) months as compared to December, January
and February (winter). Juice purity was decreased by 13-15 % at 72 hrs of staling
in both types of harvesting. Postharvest deterioration in sugarcane was found to be
related to time lag between harvesting and milling and mainly due to staling of
harvested cane up to 72 hrs in billets. Overall results suggest that, billet type
harvesting causes more cane deterioration. The proper management system and
improved sugarcane varieties with enhanced storage life using biotechnological
tools may solve this persistent problem.
Introduction
Sugarcane is globally economically the main priorities in sugarcane postharvest
important sugar crop, however it suffers management which is deteriorated in field,
heavy losses in recoverable sugar due to cut to crush delay, during transportation,
postharvest deterioration of stale cane other factors such as ambient temperature,
(Solomon, 2009). Cane quality represents humidity, cane variety, period of storage,
204
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
205
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
loss due to postharvest deterioration in the natural conditions from 2 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs,
predominant and locally adapted 36 hrs, 48 hrs, 60 hrs and 72 hrs in
commercial sugarcane varieties under December, January, February, March and
manual and mechanical harvesting at April. Canes were immediately processed
different crushing seasons. Therefore, an for fresh analysis (2 hrs) and the rest of the
attempt has been made to compare the canes were stored at natural conditions.
effects of manual and mechanical harvesting During the study daily temperature and
on postharvest sugarcane quality of humidity were recorded.
popularly grown sugarcane variety Co
86032 from December to April i.e. during Loss in cane weight
winter and summer seasons. The magnitude
of losses is evaluated and the results are Initial cane weight was measured for all the
compared. The data can be utilized to study manually and mechanically harvested canes
and compare the postharvest losses in from each storage treatment. Every time the
different sugarcane cultivars under both canes were weighed and final weight was
types of harvesting. measured. % loss in cane weight was
calculated from initial weight and final
Materials and Methods weight using following formula:
The experiment was conducted from % loss in cane weight = [(initial weight
December to February, 2005 (winter season final weight)/initial weight] X 100.
early crushing season) and April to May,
2006 (summer season late crushing The values are presented are average of
season) at sugar factory, Malegaon SSK, three replications.
MS, India. Billet type mechanical harvester
(CASE AUSTOFT, Australia) was used for Juice extraction
harvesting of sugarcane. The harvester was
available only at Malegaon SSK factory Three canes from each storage treatment
operational area and Co 86032 was the only used above were extracted at the interval of
variety available for crushing. 2 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs, 60 hrs
and 72 hrs in a clean power operated vertical
Plant material and sampling crusher. The juice was filtered through four
layered muslin cloth and used for juice
Co 86032 is mid-late maturing and locally quality and microbial analysis.
adapted commercial sugarcane variety in
India. Canes of uniform size of Co 86032 Juice quality parameters
were harvested manually (whole cane) and
mechanically (billets) at farmer s field. Brix was measured from the juice using
Harvested samples were randomly selected hand Refractometer. It is the percentage of
and kept in separate bundles in three total soluble solids present in juice sample.
replicates and brought to the laboratory Pol (apparent sucrose) was measured from
immediately after harvesting. The the same juice on Saccharimeter (Schmidt +
experiment was conducted in three Haensch Saccharomat, NIR, W2) by
replications consisting of three canes per Carruthers and Old Field (1962, ICUMSA)
replication. The quality assessment was method. The commercial cane sugar (CCS)
performed at seven storage treatments under refers to the total recoverable sugar in the
206
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
207
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
which causes more damage to the cane noticed from 2 hrs of staling to 72 hrs of
tissue and this may cause fast drying up of staling in both the crushing seasons in whole
the cane. Sing and Solomon, (2003) reported cane as well as in billets (Tables 1, 3, 5, 7
faster loss in cane weight (5.33% in billets and 9). It was significantly different
as compared to whole cane) especially after especially after 24 hrs of storage in all the
24 hrs in billet type of harvesting in April months of harvesting. As noted for loss in
subjected to staling under natural field cane weight, reducing sugars (%) were more
conditions for a period of one week. It has in billets as compared to whole cane (Tables
been suggested that the size of the billets 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9). It was highest in April in
was the crucial in postharvest deterioration billets (3.0%) as compared to whole cane
(Wood, 1976 Ghasemnejad and Jamshidi, (1.04%) at 72 hrs of staling (Tables 1, 3, 5,
2011). The loss in cane weight is very 7and 9). The rise in reducing sugars can be
critical because in India, and other Asian attributed to enhanced activities of acid and
countries, payment to farmers is made on a neutral invertases due cane staling for long
weight basis, so that a delay in supply of periods in April (Lontom et al., 2008
harvested cane to the sugar factory could Verma et al., 2012), several other hydrolytic
lead to major economic loss to cane enzymes, and action of microorganisms
growers. which converts sucrose into reducing sugars
and dextran (Suman et al., 2000 Solomon,
Effects of manual and mechanical 2009). The present results are in agreement
harvesting on juice quality parameters with Bhatia et al., (2009) reported faster
inversion of sucrose into reducing sugars
Data on effects of manual and mechanical during late crushing period. Amount of
harvesting on juice quality parameters due to reducing sugars were more in billets as
cane staling up to 72 hrs from December compared to whole cane due to the staling of
2005 to April 2006 is depicted in tables 1, 3, up to 7 days in April (Singh and Solomon,
5, 7 and 9. Juice quality deterioration of the 2003). Chopped billets provide more
harvested sugarcane is a well-known damaged surfaces for the entrance of
phenomenon, which involves multiple microorganisms in cane tissue which further
factors such as genetic makeup of the cane results into faster degradation of sucrose into
variety, the moisture status of cane, the reducing sugars, microbial polysaccharides
climatic conditions prevalent during the and dextran (Singh and Solomon, 2003).
period of cane harvesting, disease status of Decrease in stalk length due to the chopper
harvested cane, sanitary condition of crop, harvester with corresponding increased
field and cane yard where harvested cane is reducing sugars has been reported by Wood,
stored etc. (Solomon 2009 Reddy, et al., (1976). As invertase plays an important role
2014). in conversion of sucrose into reducing
sugars, there is good potential for molecular
Reducing sugars (%) manipulation of the invertase genes for high
sugar production via genetic modification in
Reducing sugars are one of the most sugarcane. The antisense technology or gene
important juice quality parameters which silencing technique has been employed to
could be utilized to predict the loss in reduce the hexose accumulation in potato
commercial cane sugar when the cane is tubers by suppressing the activity of acid
undergoing staling (Srivastava et al., 2009). invertase which leads to reduced hexose
Gradual increase in reducing sugars was production with improved processing quality
208
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
of potato tubers after long term storage in Pol was 1.76% in April 2006. High losses
(Zrenner et al., 1996 Griener et al., 1999). of sucrose in billets have been reported by
Singh and Solomon, 2003.
Brix (%) and Pol (%)
Commercial Cane Sugar (CCS) %
Results on brix % and pol % are depicted in
tables 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. In general brix % Inversion of sucrose by invertases,
was found to be increased in all the months formation of organic acids, dextran by
of harvesting from 2 to 72 hrs of staling in microorganisms and delay in transport of
whole cane as well as in billets. However, it harvested cane from field to factory are
was not significantly different in December largely responsible for loss of recoverable
and January (Tables 2 and 4). In February, sugar (Solomon et al., 2003). It has been
significantly higher brix (%) was observed reported that sugar recovery is known to
from 24 hrs of staling in whole cane while it decline under late harvest conditions and
was from 12 hrs of staling in billets as extended crushing period. Hence, it is
compared to 2 hrs of staling (Table 6). important to study such losses in order to
Significantly superior brix % observed from sustain sugar recovery (Mao et al., 2006).
36 hrs of staling in whole cane while it was Data on CCS% (Tables 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10)
from 12 hrs of staling in billets as compared revealed that CCS % did not differ
to 2 hrs of staling in March 2006 (Table 8). significantly in December and January
However, it was significantly superior at 36 (Tables 2 and 4) while in February (Table 6)
hrs of staling in both types as compared to 2 it was significantly inferior only at 60 hrs
hrs of staling in April 2006 (Table 10). As and after 36 hrs of staling in whole cane and
brix measures total soluble solids that billets respectively. Significantly decreased
includes all sugars and non-sugars, the CCS% were not observed in both whole
increased brix especially during late cane and billets in March except where it
crushing period can be due to the formation was significantly inferior only after 60 hrs of
of more reducing sugars and dextran. staling as compared to 2 hrs of staling in
Increased in brix has been reported by whole cane (Table 8). Notably, it was
Bhatia et al., (2009) and Saxena et al, (2010) significantly decreased after 24 hrs of staling
due to staling of cane up to several hours. over 2 hrs staling in April in both manual
and mechanical harvesting (Table 10).
Overall, pol % was decreased however, it Though, CCS% was found to be decreased
was significantly decreased only in April in both types of harvesting, the decrease was
2006 from 12 hrs of staling (Table 10). more pronounced in April. It was 18.45%
These results indicate that, there is more and 19.90% at 72 hrs over 2 hrs of staling in
inversion of sucrose especially during late whole cane and billets respectively (Table
crushing season due to higher temperatures. 10). When compared with December, it was
The decrease in pol % causes decrease in dropped by 13.50% at 72 hrs of staling in
CCS% and thereafter purity. Sucrose percent billet type where it was 11.11% in whole
in juice showed decreasing trend with cane. Singh and Solomon, (2003) reported
increasing staling hours by several authors significantly higher decline in recoverable
(Siddhant et al., 2008 Srivastava et al., sugar in billets as compared to whole cane in
2009 Saxena et al., 2010). Decline in pol % April. The higher temperatures have been
in billet type of harvesting after 72 hrs was shown to affect juice quality and negative
10.39% whereas in whole cane this decline effects on CCS% have been recorded from
209
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
April onwards (Srivastava et al., 2009). A in stalk length, while reducing sugars
rapid decline in CCS% during late crushing showed a corresponding increase (Wood,
period in mechanically harvested sugarcane 1976 Singh and Solomon, 2003). As both
crop was also reported by Wood, (1976) and type of harvesting lead to recoverable sugar
Singh and Solomon, (2003). Chopper loss, it can be recommended that the effects
harvester produces small size billets and of biocides and anti-inversion chemical may
therefore under hot, humid conditions help in minimizing the sucrose losses on
chopped cane accelerates deterioration much postharvest storage of sugarcane (Solomon
faster than whole stalk cane, rate of decline et al., 2007).
in CCS% tending to increase with decrease
Table.1 Effect of staling on cane weight and reducing sugars (December 2005)
210
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
Table.3 Effect of staling on cane weight and reducing sugars (January 2006)
211
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
Table.5 Effect of staling on cane weight and reducing sugars (February 2006)
212
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
Table.7 Effect of staling on cane weight and biochemical parameters (March 2006)
213
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
Table.9 Effect of staling on cane weight and biochemical parameters (April 2006)
214
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
215
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
216
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
217
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2015) 4(9): 204-218
218