Chippewa JCD 9 Repair Report

Petitioned Repair Report
Joint County Ditch No. 9

Chippewa County and Swift County, Minnesota
Date: 11/11/2020
ISG Project No.: 15-18675
REPORT FOR: FROM:

Chippewa County and Swift County ISG
629 North Eleventh Street Chuck Brandel, PE
Montevideo, MN 56265 Principal Civil Engineer
320-269-7447 115 Hickory St. + Suite 300
mmay@co.chippewa.mn.us Mankato, MN 56001
507.387.6651
Chuck.brandel@ISGInc,com
SIGNATURE SHEET
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
Signature: ____ ____
Printed Name: Chuck Brandel, PE
Date: __11/11/2020___
License Number: 43359
ISG
115 East Hickory Street, Suite 300
Mankato, MN 56001
Joint County Ditch No. 9

Chippewa County and Swift County, Minnesota
Engineer's Project Number: 15-18675

Dated this 11th day of November, 2020
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

Petition + Order ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
System Watershed .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
History ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
System Inventory ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Repairs ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Public Waters ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Wetland Impacts .................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Public Utility, Benefit, or Welfare ........................................................................................................................................................... 27
Repair Cost Estimate - SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................ 27
Summary of Findings, Conclusions, + Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 28
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Preliminary Repair Plans ...................................................................................................................................................... A
Appendix B: Maps ..................................................................................................................................................................................... B
Appendix C: Cost Estimates...................................................................................................................................................................... C
Appendix D: Reestablishment of Records ...............................................................................................................................................D
Appendix E: WCA Application .................................................................................................................................................................... E
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 (JCD 9) is a 17,209-acre watershed drainage system which is drained by a public open ditch in
Chippewa County and a series of private ditches, pump systems, and overland flow from Swift County. The mainline open ditch consists of a
seven-mile-long open ditch which spans through a series of wetland complexes. The open channel itself serves as an altered conveyance through
the wetlands, however those wetlands were never intended to be drained and serve as floodplain wetlands. Over the past 100-years, minimal
maintenance has occurred in regard to full ditch cleanouts which has led to sediment accumulation, floating cattail bogs, and other blockages
that restrict flow from being conveyed downstream.
Since the open ditch has had limited major repairs in the last 100-years, wetland complexes have expanded laterally from non-historic flood
levels. Given the current wetland laws, a traditional ditch cleaning approach is not allowable without considerable wetland mitigation. Early
coordination with multiple agencies including the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), Chippewa County Soil and Water Conservation
District (SWCD), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE), and Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR). Formal meetings with the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Technical Evaluation Panel and USCOE were also held discussing
permitting options.
No as built showing the originally constructed JCD 9 system was on record and early meetings with agencies indicated a disagreement on the
repair ditch grade. A Reestablishment of Records (ROR) Report was prepared to determine the As Constructed or Subsequently Improved
Condition (ACSIC), or legal ditch grade. The report was presented to the Joint Drainage Authority and approved in November of 2017. In February
of 2018, the DNR filed an appeal to the Court of Appeals regarding the ROR Report findings. The case was dismissed in early March of 2018,
however the DNR pushed the case to the Supreme Court. It was not until September of 2019 that a settlement between the DNR and Joint
Drainage Authority was made regarding the repair grade of JCD 9.
As part of the settlement agreement with the DNR, a head cut structure is to be designed and constructed downstream of the Public Water
Wetland in Section 19 of Big Bend Township, Chippewa County. The goal of the structure is to prevent head cutting into the Public Water which
could ultimately drain the basin. The structure has been agreed upon with the DNR and includes a hog slat crossing with rip rap overflow along
the open ditch.
A WCA application for the project was submitted and approved in June of 2019 for the repair of JCD 9. The permit includes repairing the majority
of the JCD 9 open ditch to its ACSIC condition by open ditch cleaning, hauling spoils out of wetland areas, and by installing floodplain culverts
along the roadways in the upper half of the ditch system. An addendum to this application was completed in November of 2020 to include the
head cut structure as part of the repairs to JCD 9. A total of 0.20 acres of wetland mitigation is needed for this project which includes placing
rip rap along roadways and the head cut structure within wetlands. A purchase agreement for the 0.20 acres was made and totals $7,000.
The total estimated JCD 9 repair project is $2,041,191 which includes cleaning the mainline and Branch 1 open ditch, hauling spoils out of
wetland areas, replacing culvert crossings along township roads, erosion control, wetland mitigation, and all associated administration,
engineering, and permitting.
PETITION + ORDER
A Petition was received by the Chippewa and Swift Joint Drainage Authority in 2015, requesting the repair of Joint County Ditch No. 9. In January
of 2016 the Joint Drainage Authority appointed I+S Group (ISG) as engineer for the repair.
SYSTEM WATERSHED
Location
Joint County Ditch No. 9 (JCD 9) is a 17,209-acre watershed located northeast of the City of Milan. The watershed lies in Big Bend and Kragero
Townships in Chippewa County and Edison and West Bank Townships in Swift County. JCD 9 drains all or a portion of Sections 5, 7, 8, 9, 15,
16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, and 36 of Edison Township and Section 31 of West Bank Township in Swift County; and
Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25, and 26 of Kragero Township and Sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 of
Big Bend Township in Chippewa Count
The mainline ditch lies completely in Chippewa County and runs generally SE from its end in Section 2 of Kragero Township to its outlet, an
unnamed stream, in Section 33 of Big Bend Township. The historical DNR Public Waters Inventory Map indicates that the JCD 9 mainline ditch
is an altered watercourse/public ditch throughout its length and its outlet is an unnamed creek Public Waters Watercourse. There is a Public
Waters Basin on the JCD 9 main ditch in Section 19 of Big Bend Township and is identified as PW94 or 12009400.
There is a Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) easement surrounding Branch 1 in Section 2 of Kragero Township. There are two DNR Wildlife
Management Areas at the very downstream end of the main ditch in Section 33 of Big Bend Township. Several maps are included Appendix B
indicating the location of the JCD 9 watershed and other references in respect to the repair project.
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 1 of 29

HISTORY
Original System
JCD 9 was originally established in 1910 as a public drainage system with construction of 36,000 feet of mainline ditch commencing shortly
after. The ditch system consisted of the mainline and two branches; Branch No. 1 located in Section 2 of Kragero Township and Branch No. 2.
located in Section 19 of Big Bend Township near the current day DNR Basin. No as-built documentation of the originally constructed public
drainage system has been discovered, however a Re-Establishment of Records was completed in 2017 and has been upheld since.
Subsequent Proceedings
ESTABLISHMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS
Several private open ditches that outlet into JCD 9 have been constructed since the open ditch was established. The private ditches drain
surface and subsurface drainage water from overall flow and pump systems, however none of these have been established as public drainage
systems.
In 1983, a petition for improvement was filed and preliminary engineering was completed, however the improvement project did not move
forward as it was denied a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) permit.
REPAIR HISTORY
The topography of the JCD 9 alignment and original construction of the open channel indicates that the system was designed to utilize the low-
lying areas along the ditch as floodplain storage and the small open channel to convey perennial flows. This type of system generally requires
little maintenance as the smaller channel carries higher velocities to keep the channel open and flowing.
Throughout its history, JCD 9 has had many minor repairs primarily to keep water moving through the system. The repairs included spot ditch
cleaning, culvert replacements, and routine beaver dam removals. Most of these repairs were not fully documented and only included payments,
dates, a brief description of work completed, and approximate locations. In no case, did the repair tickets contain all the previously listed
information and no references to legal ditch conditions were made during the repairs. No full ditch cleanouts are on record. Undocumented
repairs reference as far back as the 1950s which include spot ditch cleaning and culvert replacements along township roadways after washouts,
however no documentation of repairs was recorded until the 1980s.
Repairs in the 1980s included open ditch cleaning in Sections 11 and 12 of Kragero Township. In 1989 a field crossing was constructed in
Section 12 of Kragero Township. This was in violation of the Waters of the U.S. rules for filling in wetland and for placing contaminated material
in wetlands. The crossing was removed in the early 1990s.
More documentation of repairs dating back to the early 2000s indicate spot cleanouts and multiple beaver dam removals in several areas along
the JCD 9 mainline.
There are no repair records for Branch 1, however given is hydraulic condition it is likely that routine cleanouts have occurred.
RE-DETERMINATION OF BENEFITS
A re-determination of benefits for JD9 was completed in 2015. The value of the drainage system was placed at a 15 percent efficiency due to
the restrictions within the ditch and its inability to carry flow as originally designed.
REESTABLISHMENT OF RECORDS
In 2017 drainage records for JCD 9 were deemed to be incomplete and the Joint County Drainage Authority reestablished them according to
103E.101 DRAINAGE PROCEEDING AND CONSTRUCTION RECORDS, Subd. 4a. Reestablishing Records. That procedure resulted in the As
Constructed or Subsequently Improved Condition (ACSIC) for the system. Although the ROR Report was approved in 2017, a series of appeals
by the DNR delayed the repair proceedings until an agreement on the repair was made in September of 2019 with the DNR. A copy of the
Reestablishment of Records Report is included in Appendix D.
Project Timeline
Since being appointed in 2016, ISG has performed many engineering services related to the present JCD 9 repair project to comply with
Minnesota Drainage Law, agency regulations, and to design a hydraulically functioning system. The following timeline highlights the sequence
of events.
• 2016
o January-Joint Drainage Authority Appoints ISG to JCD 9 Repair.
o March-Preliminary surveying to develop repair concept for review.
o July-initial meeting with DNR, WCA-Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP), U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) to review project
impacts. Several concerns raised by agencies in response to repair impacts and permit requirements. Alternatives were
reviewed for repairs; however additional survey information was requested by agencies to develop detailed repair plan.
o December-ISG continues topographic survey of JCD 9.
• 2017
o February-ISG completes full topographic survey of JCD 9.

o March-Full plan and profiles completed of the JCD 9 ditch and two repair alternatives included a repair following the original
alignment and a ditch re-route.
o April-Preliminary repair options and profiles sent to agencies for review. Several comments were received with concerns about
rerouting the ditch, impacts to state and federally owned or protected lands, and hydrologic impacts from the repair.
o May-Conference call with agencies to review project and comments. A disagreement with the identified legal ditch grade was
brought up by the DNR.
o July and August-Soil borings completed by ISG with members of the County, NRCS, SWCD and DNR in attendance.
o August-ISG updated profiles including raising the originally determined legal ditch grade based on the soil borings taken.
o August-Landowner meeting reviewing the project status and work to date completed on the repair project. A recommendation
by the Drainage Authority Attorney (Rinke Noonan) was made to follow the Reestablishment of Records procedure to
determine and finalize the legal ditch grade of the JCD 9 ditch for repairs to be made.
o September-Public hearing to officially appoint ISG to prepare the Reestablishment of Records Report.
o November-Reestablishment of Records Report submitted. A hearing was held, and the Report was accepted by the Drainage
Authority.
• 2018
o February-Minnesota DNR files an appeal of the Reestablishment of Records Report to the court of appeals.
o February- DNR appeal case was dismissed, however DNR files case to Supreme Court.
o April-Informational meeting with landowners to review options for repairs. Several options were presented with an estimated
cost, timeline, and permit routes needed. Landowners indicated a repair cleaning area that are above legal ditch grade and
leave areas near or below legal grade. The preferred repair also avoided cleaning in WMA and DNR Public Waters locations
along the ditch.
o May-December-ISG completes detailed 2D hydrologic/hydraulic modeling of the drainage system and prepares a WCA
application for the proposed repairs. Multiple iterations were completed of the application based on comments from agencies
and to comply with specific permit requirements.
• 2019
o January-WCA application for drainage exemption submitted to the TEP.
o February-Meeting with TEP to review application and make small adjustments for wetland impacts.
o June-WCA permit application approved. ISG and Drainage Authority Staff met with USCOE to review the project and what
permits may be required. A public hearing was also held to review WCA application and for a project update. DNR was in
attendance and provided comments related to the project, however no update on the Supreme Court process for the case.
o July-Meeting with Drainage Authority Staff, ISG, DNR, attorneys to discuss a settlement agreement. DNR requested additional
soil borings and a discussion on a head cut structure downstream of the DNR Basin to prevent draining of the basin.
o July-Additional soil borings completed by ISG, DNR, and Drainage Authority Staff.
o August-ISG sends additional soil borings on profiles to DNR to confirm the Reestablished ASCIC (legal) grade.
o September-Settlement agreement between Drainage Authority and DNR signed which included specific culvert replacement
elevations (floodplain culverts) and a head cut structure downstream of the DNR Public Water Basin.
o November-December-ISG collected additional survey data for review of head cut structure.
• 2020
o January-Head cut structure review and initial conversations started by ISG to the DNR.
o February-DNR reviewed materials presented by ISG and completed own analysis of the head cut structure.
o April-Conference call with DNR to discuss the head cut structure design.
o May-Detailed structure designs sent to DNR for review.
o June-Initial comments from DNR regarding the head cut design were provided to ISG. ISG updated plans and resubmitted to
the DNR.
o July-DNR provides final comments and approval of the head cut structure design.
o September-TEP meeting regarding permitting of the head cut structure
o October-TEP meeting regarding permitting and additional mitigation for the head cut structure
o November-Addendum to the WCA Joint Application permit submitted with additional mitigation for the head cut structure
Investigation of External Sources of Funding and Technical Assistance

Section 103E.015, Subd. 1a of the Drainage Code requires that an investigation of external sources of funding and technical assistance be
conducted prior to an order on the engineer's preliminary survey report for a drainage project or the engineer's report for a repair. The funding
can be used for wetland preservation or restoration or creation of water quality improvements, flood control, or alternative measures (per Section
103E.015, Subd. 1, clause (2)). The sources of funding authorized under this Section can be used outside the benefited area but must be used
in the watershed of the system.
The investigation of external sources of funding and technical assistance for System Abbreviation was conducted by ISG on behalf of Chippewa
and Swift Joint Drainage Authority. The following paragraphs describe the results of that investigation.
Following is a list of agencies and organizations that were contacted related to external sources of funding and technical assistance, along with
any results from those contacts.

Organization/Agency Date of Contact Eligibility Information Received
Contacted
Chippewa SWCD 3/9/2020 Private Landowners There may be money available for side inlets and some on-field
and on-farm best management practices as well as RIM, and
CREP.
MN Board of Water 3/9/2020 Private Landowners Suggested looking to the SWCD for RIM and CREP, and to SWCD,
and Soil Resources County, or Watershed for MDM, Projects and Practices and
1W1P funding,
Chippewa County 3/9/2020 Private Landowners General Cycle Application closed March 13, 2020. Can apply
NRCS Service Center throughout the year. Could be up to two windows of funding.
Technical assistance as well as direct funding available for on-
system, on-field, and on-farm best management practices.
MN DNR-Conservation 11/3/2020 Public Access Areas The project is not eligible as it does not lie on public land,
Partners Legacy Grant although it protects public land.
Landowners will be made aware of and encouraged to apply for available funds and technical assistance for both structural practices as well as
conservation programs.
SYSTEM INVENTORY
This document has been prepared using the original drawings and alignment maps provided by Chippewa County, a topographic survey done by
ISG in 2016, LiDAR contours, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Watershed lines, and drone and aerial photographs. A map of
Chippewa and Swift Joint Drainage Authority can be found in the Repair Plans.
An inventory of items needing repair was accomplished for Chippewa and Swift Joint Drainage Authorityusing the results of drone flight(s) and
the topographic survey.
Flood waters within the JCD 9 watershed have permanently inundated 80th Street NW and routinely overtops other roadways in Chippewa and
Swift Counties, posing an immediate threat to public safety and public access. Water levels in wetland areas have permanently raised by more
than 8-inches throughout the entire system since 2017. Public infrastructure including public ditches, roadways, and culverts have been
damaged and no longer function to their designs.
Ditches
The JCD 9 drainage system was designed to provide drainage to upstream properties through the wetland complexes in the low-lying areas while
utilizing depressional areas as wetland/floodplain storage. A small open ditch was constructed through the middle of the wetlands to provide
base flow downstream while utilizing the floodplain areas for storage during rain events. These floodplains consist of shallow marsh and meadow
areas that were frequently flooding.
Currently, little flow is observed in the JCD 9 mainline ditch under base flow conditions due to restrictions. Without positive drainage, the capacity
of the historic floodplain to receive flood waters has been reduced causing higher water levels more frequently than historically observed.
Adjacent wetland complexes along the open ditch in Sections 2, 11, 12, and 13 of Kragero have significantly expanded in recent years and the
expansion has changed adjacent land uses and saturated or inundated historical meadow and upland areas.
The Branch 1 open ditch is clear of major restrictions. There are old spoil piles along this ditch which indicate general cleaning over time.
Sediment Deposition + Vegetation Growth

JCD 9 has received little maintenance over time. Sediment and vegetation (large cattail mats) have accumulated in the ditch, causing water
levels to rise. This, then, transformed the floodplain wetlands into a large marsh with dense cattails. The cattail marsh continues to expand
laterally as floodwaters continue to rise due to lack of drainage.
Sediment accumulation throughout the open ditch ranges between 6-inches and 36-inches. Beaver dams also restrict flow. However, they are
usually temporary, as they have routinely been removed. Cattail bogs are the most predominant type of ditch restriction as they completely block
the open channel as shown in Figure 1 through Figure 3.

Figure 1: Cattail Marsh Covering the Open Ditch in Section 13 of Kragero Township
Figure 2: Cattail Marsh with Small Open Channel in Section 18 of Big Bend Township

Figure 3: Open Channel Restricted by Cattails in Section 11 of Kragero Township
During the summer months it can be difficult to identify the open channel, as the cattails are so dense and migrating. Figure 4 shows cattails in
the open ditch in Section 19 of Big Bend Township (just downstream of the DNR Public Water Basin) leaving only a slightly visible ditch line.
Figure 4: Extreme Cattail Growth Blocking Open Ditch in Section 19 of Big Bend Township near the DNR Basin

Similar to the aerial photographs shown previously, drone aerial photographs were taken after a rain event during the snowmelt in 2019. Figure
5 and Figure 6 show the expanded flooding out of the historical wetland boundary in Section 13 of Kragero Township. While this specific event
was not during normal summer rain events, the impacts are similar to those that occur after frequent rainfall events throughout the watershed.
Figure 5: Flooding out of Historic Wetland Levels in Section 13 of Kragero Township Upstream of 130th Avenue NW
Figure 6: Flood Waters into Upland/Tree Areas Along the Wetland Boundary in Section 13 of Kragero Township

Many of the roadways throughout the JCD 9 drainage system have been impacted by the flooding conditions along the JCD 9 mainline ditch.
The township road, 80th Street NW, is permanently inudated by water from the expanding wetlands. Figure 7 below shows 80th Street NW as
impassible during low flow conditions.
Figure 7: 80th Street NW Inundated During Low Flow
Other roadways along the JCD 9 open ditch experience frequent overtopping after rain events. The overtopping frequency has increased in the
past 5 years. The following figures show the township road crossings after a rainfall event during snowmelt in the spring of 2019. As shown, the
majority of the roadways overtopped due to the flooding.

Figure 8: 80th Street NW Overtopping

Figure 9: 140th Ave NW Overtopping

Figure 10: 130th Ave NW Overtopping
Figure 11: State Highway 40 Flooding in Road ROW

Figure 12: Intersection of 120th Ave NW and 50th Street NW Flooding
The JCD 9 open ditch near the PWI Basin is nearly completely blocked by sediment accumulation and associated dense cattail growth. Only a
small reach of the ditch is visible in Figure 13.
Figure 13: JCD 9 Open Ditch near DNR PWI Basin (Section 19 of Big Bend Township)

Sloughing
Sloughing occurs when the bank of a ditch shears and collapses into the ditch. Causes of sloughing include overland flow overtopping the ditch
bank, lack of buffer vegetation, steep side slopes, and meandering of the ditch. When sloughing occurs in most open ditches, it deposits
sediment in the ditch restricting flow. Due to the presence of dense cattails, sloughing has not been observed on the mainline open ditch.
However, some sloughing has been observed on Branch 1 of the JCD 9 ditch.
Tile Outlets
The condition of tile outlets along the mainline open ditch is unknown. It is possible that they could be bent, broken, covered or completely
washed away. There are some tile outlets that provide drainage to the road ditch.
Culvert Crossings
Culvert crossings along the JCD 9 open ditch range in size and type from small Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) to large Reinforced Concrete Pipe
(RCP) box and arch crossings. No as-built documentation has been found for any JCD 9 road crossing culverts. Culvert crossings were unreliable
in determining the ACSIC (legal) ditch grade in the 2017 Reestablishment of Records (ROR). Many township road crossings have washed out
over time requiring immediate replacement. At such time, the townships have replaced or added culverts to resolve flooding problems and
reopen roadways. There have been no repairs to any culverts since the ROR.
Existing culverts are generally installed near the ACSIC ditch grade of the drainage system; continuing the ditch grade through the road crossings.
Most of the culvert crossings in the downstream portion of the ditch system are within 1-foot of the ACSIC ditch grade. However, the culverts
along township roadways in the upper portion of the ditch are 2 to 3-feet above the legal ditch grade.
The majority of the crossings in the downstream half of the watershed from State HWY 40 to the outlet are large RCP box and arch crossings
that are in good condition and not in immediate need of replacement as shown in Figure 14. The crossings under 70th Street NW, 140th Avenue
NW, and 80th Street NW in the upper half of the watershed are in poor condition or are above legal ditch grade and are need of repair as shown
in Figure 15.
Figure 14: RCP Arch Culvert Crossing Under 110th Avenue (Setcion 29 Big Bend Township)

Figure 15: CMP Culverts Under 140th Street NW Above Legal Grade (Section 11 Kragero Township)
Table 1 summarizes the existing culvert crossing inventory throughout the legal ditch alignment of JCD 9. As shown, the majority of the culverts
downstream of 130th Avenue NW are in fair to good condition and are at or below the legal ditch grade. However upstream of this point, the
culverts are in poor or failing conditions and elevations are above the legal ditch grade.

Table 1: Existing Culvert Crossing Inventory
Existing Existing Depth Above
Existing Existing Existing
Crossing # Location Existing Type Upstream Downstream Legal Grade
Material Size (in) Condition
Invert Invert (ft)
ROUND
1 80th Street NW C MP 36 997.36 996.33 1.03 Failing
C ULVERT
ROUND
1 80th Street NW C MP 36 997.05 996.33 0.72 Failing
C ULVERT
ROUND
2 140th Ave NW C MP 36 996.02 996.16 2.27 Poor
C ULVERT
ROUND
2 140th Ave NW C MP 36 995.7 995.72 1.83 Poor
C ULVERT
ROUND
2 140th Ave NW C MP 36 995.76 995.5 1.87 Poor
C ULVERT
ROUND
2 140th Ave NW C MP 36 996.62 996.28 2.73 Poor
C ULVERT
ROUND
3 70th Street NW C MP 48 993.46 993.65 1.79 Poor
C ULVERT
ROUND
3 70th Street NW C MP 48 994.41 994.39 2.55 Fair
C ULVERT
4 130th Ave NW ARC H C ULVERT C MP 66 990.87 990.69 -0.06 Fair
5 State Hwy 40 BOX C ULVERT RC P 6' x 12' 989.74 989.16 -0.81 Good
50th St & 120th

6 ARC H C ULVERT RC P 84" 987.48 987.15 -1.71 Good
Ave
50th St & 120th
6 ARC H C ULVERT RC P 84" 987.51 987.17 -1.68 Good
Ave
7 110th Ave NW ARC H C ULVERT RC P 97" x 152" 984.96 983.61 -2.69 Good
8 40th Street NW ARC H C ULVERT RC P 97" x 152" 984.44 983.99 -3.13 Good
Most traditional ditch systems are designed for a drainage coefficient of 1.0 inch/day which is defined as the depth of water that drains in a 24-
hour period of an upstream watershed. As a result, most culvert crossings are designed to meet the 1.0 inch/day drainage standard. For JCD 9
however, the ditch system was not designed for a 1.0 inch/day drainage coefficient. Rather, it was designed to utilize the adjacent floodplain
and convey perineal flows through a small open channel. Therefore, for JCD 9, drainage coefficients were not utilized for the analysis of the
drainage capacities on the open ditch and culvert crossings.
REPAIRS
The goal of the JCD 9 repair project is to respond to the petition for repair as closely as possible while following applicable drainage and wetland
laws. This will restore the historic base flow through the wetland complexes via the JCD 9 open ditch. Given the nature of the project spanning
through large wetland complexes along the JCD 9 mainline, both State and Federal wetland laws must be followed to avoid mandatory mitigation.
Included in the repairs for JCD 9 are open ditch cleaning removing sediment and cattail accumulation, replacing and lowering of culverts to legal
ditch grade, installing rip rap for erosion protection, and constructing a head cut structure along the open ditch to prevent draining the DNR PWI
Basin. The open ditch cleaning will follow the ACSIC grade and alignment as outlined in the Reestablishment of Records Report. Some areas in
the downstream portion of the ditch near the Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) will not be repaired at this time as the drainage conditions are
not in need of repair. Preliminary repair plans are included in Appendix A.
Repair Project Components

DITCH CLEANING
Open ditch cleaning for the JCD 9 repair project includes portions of the mainline open ditch and all of the Branch 1 open ditch. Cleaning of the
ditches will follow the ACSIC grades and cross section as identified in the Reestablishment of Records report. This includes open ditch bottom
widths of 3-feet and grades ranging from 0.02 percent to 0.13 percent.
There are three types of cleaning specified for the JCD 9 repair which includes standard open ditch cleaning, cleaning through wetland areas,
and cleaning along roadways. These three methods were separated based on the scope of the repair, requirements of wetland laws for ditch
repairs, and for purposes of bidding and quantity tracking.

Standard Ditch Cleaning
This type of ditch cleaning includes traditional open ditch cleaning by clearing sediment at the legal ditch bottom elevation and bottom width.
Standard bucket equipped excavators will be used for this type of cleaning. Spoils from removals will be cast alongside the ditch at the top of
ditch bank in the buffer and leveled with a bulldozer. Once leveled and dried, the spoils will be reseeded with native buffer seed mix. In some
areas where sloughing has occurred on the ditch banks, slough repairs and side slope flattening will occur for channel stability. Standard ditch
cleaning will only be used on Branch 1.
Clean and Remove Spoils

This type of cleaning will repair the open ditch to legal ditch bottom elevation and ditch width through wetland areas that can be accessed from
adjacent roadways. Spoils from these areas will be hauled out of the ditch/wetland and placed in upland locations to comply with the WCA
permit. The spoil placement areas are identified on the plans and will be leveled with bulldozers and left to dry. The spoils can then be tilled into
the existing soil. No wetland impacts from construction are anticipated with this type of repair.
Clean and Remove Spoils with Construction Mats

Open ditch cleaning under this scenario will repair the open channel back to legal ditch elevation and bottom width through the wetland areas
along the JCD 9 main ditch. Due to large wetland and cattail marsh complexes in this scenario, ditch access will require placement of construction
mats alongside the open ditch. This will temporarily impact the cattails by matting them down, however most of the cattails in those areas will
reemerge. A 16-foot width of construction mats will be placed at the top of the ditch bank, providing access to excavation equipment and haul
trucks. Several mat access points will be required to efficiently approach the ditch for cleaning while providing a haul route for spreading spoils
in upland areas. This methodology is required under the WCA permit for ditch cleaning through wetland complexes. Additionally, excavation
equipment must be GPS equipped to assure cleaning to legal ditch grade through the wetland complexes. Figure 16 shows an example of
construction mats used through cattail marshes/wetlands.
Figure 16: Example of Construction Mats Through Wetlands (Source: Midwest Access Solutions)
Slough Repairs
Any sloughing or erosion areas encountered during the repair will be regraded and reseeded as part of the repair. This will include removing the
sloughed material, re-sloping the ditch bank to match the adjacent side slopes and seeding with erosion control blanket on the banks. An
estimated 2,000 feet of slough repairs are included based on the length of the open ditch.
Tile Outlet Repair

All tile outlets outflowing into a ditch will be replaced or repaired as part of this project when encountered. The repair will include riprap protection
on geotextile fabric below tile outlets and replacement of damaged tile outlets where necessary. During the topographic survey, minimal tile
outlets were located. For purposes of this report, it will be assumed that a tile outlet will be encountered every 5,000 linear feet of ditch.
Buffer Establishment
There are no areas on JCD 9 without 1-rod buffers or perennial vegetation. The 103E ditch buffers would have been required when the system
was redetermined in 2015. Upon removal of sediment from the open ditch and final grading, the 1-rod buffers will be seeded primarily along
the Branch 1 ditch. The mainline ditch lies within a wetland complex which has perennial vegetation that will reestablish after construction.
CULVERT CROSSINGS
Several of the culvert crossing along the JCD 9 open ditch need repair as they are in poor condition, have back slope, or are above legal ditch
grade. In lieu of replacing culverts to standard drainage conditions at legal grade and a minimum of 1.0 inch/day drainage coefficient, an
alternative culvert plan was developed to minimize wetland drainage impacts, prevent large increases in peak flow rates, and overall reduce
potential scour and erosion. This plan includes only replacing culverts in the upper half of the watershed (including Branch 1) with the intent of
providing both perennial flow capacity by lowering half of them to legal grade and keeping the other half at a higher elevation for floodplain
drainage in larger rainfall events. This design also complies with WCA permit requirements by maintaining wetland hydrology conditions like

those observed 25-years ago. Another benefit associated with floodplain culverts is that they protect roadways from overtopping during more
frequent flood events.
The culvert replacements include culverts along the open ditch where Branch 1 crosses 80th Street NW, the mainline ditch crossing at 140th
Avenue NW, and 70th Street NW. Where two culverts exist at the 80th Street NW crossing, one culvert will be placed at legal grade with the other
one will be placed above legal grade. At 140th Avenue NW where there are 4 culverts, two new culverts will be placed at legal grade while the
other two will be placed above legal grade to comply with the WCA permit. At 70th Street NW, only 1 culvert will be replaced and the second
culvert will remain in place as a floodplain culvert. This design strategy also decreases sedimentation in both sets of culverts, reducing the need
for future maintenance.
The remaining culverts from 130th Avenue NW downstream to the JCD 9 outlet are in good condition, have adequate capacity for the planned
repairs, and will not be replaced. Since there will not be any changes to these culverts, downstream hydrologic conditions will not be altered and
wetland impacts will be negligible. Table 2 below summarizes the proposed culvert in the upper half of the JCD 9 system.
Table 2: Proposed Culvert Replacement

Existing Existing Depth Above Proposed Proposed Proposed
Existing Existing Existing Proposed Proposed
Crossing # Location Existing Type Upstream Downstream Legal Grade Slope Upstream Downstream
Material Size (in) Condition Material Size (in)
Invert Invert (ft) (%) Invert Invert
ROUND
1 80th Street NW C MP 36 997.36 996.33 1.03 Failing RC P 36 0.05% 996.80 996.78
C ULVERT
ROUND
1 80th Street NW C MP 36 997.05 996.33 0.72 Failing RC P 36 0.05% 996.30 996.28
C ULVERT
ROUND
2 140th Ave NW C MP 36 996.02 996.16 2.27 Poor RC P 36 0.78% 994.11 993.88
C ULVERT
ROUND
C ULVERT
ROUND
C ULVERT
ROUND
C ULVERT
ROUND
3 70th Street NW C MP 48 993.46 993.65 1.79 Poor RC P 48 0.10% 991.87 991.86
C ULVERT
ROUND
3 70th Street NW C MP 48 994.41 994.39 2.55 Fair n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
C ULVERT
EROSION CONTROL
Permanent erosion control will consist of riprap around repaired culvert crossings to prevent erosion of the ditch and roadway. Seeding and
erosion control blanket will be placed on all disrupted areas around road crossings. All disturbed vegetation along Branch 1 including ditch
banks and buffers will be reseeded during construction to reestablish vegetation promptly with either erosion control blanket or bonded fiber
matrix. Vegetation along the mainline open ditch will not be reseeded as the reemergence of cattails will occur upon removal of construction
mats. An Erosion Control Plan will be included in the final construction plans.
PUBLIC WATERS
There are two DNR Public Waters in the JCD 9 watershed. The first is at the outlet of the system in Section 33 of Big Bend Township. The JCD 9
mainline ditch outlets directly into a Public Watercourse in the center of Section 33. It is mapped as an unnamed stream but is locally known as
Lines Creek. Lines Creek flows for approximately 3 miles downstream before outletting into the Chippewa River. Figure 17 shows the Lines Creek
Public Watercourse downstream of the JCD 9 ditch outlet.

Figure 17: Unnamed Stream Public Waters Outlet In Section 4 of Tunsberg Township (Looking Downstream)
The second Public Water is a basin located in Section 19 of Big Bend Township along the mainline open ditch. This Public Water Basin which is
identified as Basin ID 12009400 contains open water depths ranges between 2 and 4 feet. The JCD 9 mainline open ditch near the PWI Basin
is nearly completed blocked by sediment accumulation leading to dense cattail growth. Only a small trail of the open ditch is visible where the
majority of the flow travels as shown in Figure 18.

Figure 18:Open Water Portion of DNR PWI Basin 12009400 (Section 19 Big Bend Township)
HEAD CUT STRUCTURE

During the Reestablishment of Records process for JCD 9, concerns were raised regarding the potential of a repair project impacting the DNR
Public Water Basin 12009400. A lengthy appeal process resulted, including DNR appealing the Drainage Authority’s decision to the Supreme
Court. Ultimately the appeal was dismissed and an agreement between the Drainage Authority and the DNR was made to resume the 103.E
repair process. Under that agreement the Drainage Authority will install a “head cut” structure along the open ditch to prevent complete draining
of the Public Water Basin.
The head cut structure was discussed and then cooperatively designed by the DNR, Drainage Authority, and ISG staff. It includes placing hog
slats on a berm placed across the JCD 9 mainline open ditch downstream of the DNR Public Water Basin. This will create a small “Texas”
crossing in the open ditch that can be used for access during low flow rates. It is not designed to provide consistent access across the open
ditch and wetland complex. The elevation of the top of the crossing will match the existing sediment elevation of 991.70 and will be placed in
the center of the open ditch. Three hog slats 4-feet wide by 10-feet long will be installed on top of clay borrow berm with rip rap on each side to
provide an adequate “head cut” structure. The head cut structure will be keyed into the adjacent ditch bank by 2.5 feet and will also be anchor
into the mainline channel with rebar stake anchors to prevent the structure from washing away and to create a low maintenance structure. The
total width of the crossing is approximately 60 feet wide to ensure an adequate connection point into the adjacent ground to prevent cutting
around the structure. The crossing itself will cover an area of 1,050 square feet within the open ditch and adjacent wetlands. Figure 19 shows
a profile and cross section view of the “head cut” structure.

Figure 19: Profile and Cross Section View of DNR Head Cut Structure
Overall, the “head cut” structure will create a restriction within the JCD 9 mainline open ditch. However, the WCA permit did not include cleaning
the open ditch through the DNR Basin which would act as a restriction. The compromise between the DNR and Drainage Authority on the “head
cut” structure would allow for cleaning through the DNR Basin. While the overall elevation of the repair does not change from the WCA application
to the “head cut” structure, the flow conditions will be enhanced.
The “head cut” structure will ultimately impound up to 24-inches of water along the mainline open ditch in the DNR Basin and upstream into
Section 13 of Kragero Township. The impoundment will be similar to what was approved in the WCA permit. Drainage conditions under base
flows will be significantly better since cleaning through the DNR Basin will remove the restrictions caused by cattail bog and sediment and
restore open channel flow. The open water created within the open channel will deter cattails from returning to block the open channel. Figure
20 shows the overall upstream impacts of the “head cut” structure during low flow periods.

Figure 20: Upstream Impacts by Head Cut Structure
It should be emphasized that the “head cut” structure is primarily designed for low flow conditions and intended to prevent complete draining
of the DNR Basin under dry conditions. Under most flow conditions and during rain events, the “head cut” structure will be fully inundated by
water and the flow will pass through the open ditch and migrate through the wetland complexes as it currently does. Major flow restrictions are
not anticipated with the proposed structure design. It is recommended that the Drainage Authority inspects the head cut structure annually to
look for structural degradation and flanking.
Figure 21 shows an overall repair map indicating locations for specific ditch cleaning types, culvert replacement locations and specific elevations,
and the location of the “head cut” structure. Preliminary repair plans are included in Appendix A.

Figure 21: Overall Repair Map

WETLAND IMPACTS
The JCD 9 mainline open ditch runs through a series of wetland complexes that are overgrown with cattails, which has led to flooding beyond
the historical wetland boundaries. Given the applicable Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules, permits are required to work through wetland
complexes such as those in the JCD 9 drainage system. A WCA permit for Drainage Exemption was applied for and granted in 2019. The permit
includes showing that the proposed repairs to JCD 9 do not drain wetlands to levels beyond that which existed 25-years ago.
An addendum to the approved permit was submitted in November of 2020 for the installation of the head cut structure. This structure will
impact wetlands areas as a foundation is needed to hold the hog slat structure in place. Wetland mitigation was required by the WCA-Technical
Evaluation Panel for this structure impacting 0.03 acres and for placing rip rap covering an area of 0.17 acres along roadways to protect them
from erosion. The proposed project did not require a permit from the USCOE; however a preconstruction notification is required for the installation
of the head cut structure. A detailed permit application for the JCD 9 repair project is included in Appendix E.
The WCA application included a detailed analysis of the wetland impacts from the proposed repair based on the detailed 2-dimenstaional
modeling throughout the watershed. The analysis included comparing the existing wetland boundaries, wetland boundaries from 25-years ago
(at the time of the application), and how the proposed repair would impact them. Figure 22 and Figure 23 show the wetland boundaries
determitned off historical aerial photos for 2017 and 1993.
Figure 22: 1993 Aerial Photo in Section 2 and 11 of Kragero Township Showing the Wetland Boundary (Yellow)

Figure 23: 2017 Aerial Photo in Section 2 and 11 of Kragero Township Showing the Wetland Boundary (Red)
Figure 24 and Figure 25 show the flood extents from the 2-dimensional model used for comparing anticipated water levels in the wetland areas.
In these figures, the flood extents shown in a color ramp from blue to red based on depth nearly cover the 1993 wetland boundary on the 2-
year rainfall frequency and fully cover the 1993 wetland boundary under the 5-year frequency. This analysis shows that under the repair with
the use of floodplain culverts, no wetland impacts beyond what historically existed 25-years ago will occur. A similar analysis was completed for
the remainder of the JCD 9 ditch system downstream to the outlet, comparing the same flood impacts to the wetlands. Those details are included
in the modeling section of the WCA application.

Figure 24: Flood Extents of the Repair Conditions under the 2-year Rainfall Frequency
Figure 25: Flood Extents of the Repair Conditions under the 5-year Rainfall Frequency

Three 2-dimensional models were simulated for the JCD 9 system and included the existing conditions, legal drainage conditions of JCD 9, and
the proposed repair altenative described in this report. The peak flow rates and peak flood elevation results from the 2-dimensional models
were also compared in the WCA application. Table 3 below shows the results from all three models for JCD 9 under the 2, 5 and 10-year rainfall
frequenceis. Addiational results for less frequcent events are included in the WCA applcaiton along with a more detailsed model summary. As
shown, peak flow rates genearlly increase throughout the JCD 9 ditch system as expected with repairs allowing for more conveyance throughout
the ditch. When comparing the legal repairs to the repair alterantive (proposed repair), there is a decrease in peak flow rate due to the floodplain
cuverts. The floodplain culverts provide more storage to the floodplain areas along the ditch, resulting in lower peak flow rates being conveyed
downstream.
Table 3: Peak Flow Rate Comparison For 2D Model Simulations

2-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Legal % Change Legal % Change Legal % Change
Location Conveyence Existing Repair Alt % Change Existing Repair Alt % Change Existing Repair Alt % Change
Repair (Legal- Repair (Legal- Repair (Legal-
(cfs) (cfs) (Ex-Legal) (cfs) (cfs) (Ex-Legal) (cfs) (cfs) (Ex-Legal)
(cfs) Alt) (cfs) Alt) (cfs) Alt)
Open Channel 34.40 43.26 44.21 26% 2% 104.89 111.16 111.70 6% 0% 144.19 145.13 147.16 1% 1%
Ditch Outlet Overflow 49.31 72.61 73.17 47% 1% 203.92 246.30 244.30 21% -1% 312.86 358.69 354.10 15% -1%
Total 83.71 115.86 117.38 38% 1% 308.81 357.45 356.00 16% 0% 457.05 503.82 501.26 10% -1%
Culvert 58.19 79.83 80.25 37% 1% 210.47 253.25 255.27 20% 1% 316.69 360.25 362.60 14% 1%
40th Street NW Overflow N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 58.19 79.83 80.25 37% 1% 210.47 253.25 255.27 20% 1% 316.69 360.25 362.60 14% 1%
Culvert 56.89 80.57 81.29 42% 1% 213.79 254.60 253.10 19% -1% 319.51 368.23 366.14 15% -1%
110th Avenue NW Overflow N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 56.89 80.57 81.29 42% 1% 213.79 254.60 253.10 19% -1% 319.51 368.23 366.14 15% -1%
Open Channel 36.48 64.41 65.40 77% 2% 96.44 140.14 140.57 45% 0% 123.08 177.40 175.71 44% -1%
Upstream WMA Areas Overflow 44.75 48.73 50.42 9% 3% 192.36 192.07 192.56 0% 0% 287.70 292.82 287.00 2% -2%
Total 81.23 113.14 115.83 39% 2% 288.80 332.21 333.13 15% 0% 410.78 470.22 462.71 14% -2%
Culvert#1 28.30 43.18 43.04 53% 0% 94.05 121.45 119.75 29% -1% 133.07 170.73 166.49 28% -2%
Culvert#2 29.78 43.18 44.08 45% 2% 94.32 121.45 120.08 29% -1% 132.90 170.73 166.75 28% -2%
120th Avenue NW
Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A
Total 58.09 86.37 87.12 49% 1% 188.37 242.91 239.83 29% -1% 265.97 341.47 333.24 28% -2%
Open Channel 17.06 59.74 59.97 250% 0% 26.65 98.78 98.51 271% 0% 29.36 112.42 109.95 283% -2%
Downstream DNR Basin Overflow 114.03 100.64 101.38 -12% 1% 268.82 258.10 252.90 -4% -2% 337.16 351.93 334.07 4% -5%
Total 131.09 160.37 161.35 22% 1% 295.47 356.88 351.41 21% -2% 366.53 464.35 444.02 27% -4%
Culvert 96.54 120.88 121.04 25% 0% 242.32 274.13 269.49 13% -2% 330.64 385.75 368.45 17% -4%
60th Street NW (HWY 40) Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A
Total 96.54 120.88 121.04 25% 0% 242.32 274.13 269.49 13% -2% 330.64 385.75 368.45 17% -4%
Culvert 48.04 75.35 75.36 57% 0% 115.13 166.49 155.81 45% -6% 150.98 243.26 216.70 61% -11%
130th Avenue NW Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A
Total 48.04 75.35 75.36 57% 0% 115.13 166.49 155.81 45% -6% 150.98 243.26 216.70 61% -11%
Open Channel 16.35 45.37 45.33 177% 0% 33.06 71.01 68.44 115% -4% 39.11 87.96 82.80 125% -6%
Middle Section 13-Kragero Overflow 34.00 9.37 9.16 -72% -2% 106.96 124.15 112.89 16% -9% 152.49 201.87 172.60 32% -14%
Total 50.36 54.73 54.50 9% 0% 140.02 195.16 181.33 39% -7% 191.59 289.83 255.40 51% -12%
Culvert#1 33.68 26.60 48.01 -21% 81% 78.45 86.91 132.00 11% 52% 99.54 127.34 171.04 28% 34%
Culvert#2 13.19 26.59 5.13 102% -81% 42.91 86.90 31.74 103% -63% 63.17 127.32 54.39 102% -57%
70th Street NW
Total 46.87 53.19 53.14 13% 0% 121.36 173.81 163.74 43% -6% 162.70 254.66 225.42 57% -11%
Open Channel 5.86 29.61 29.61 406% 0% 12.45 55.75 52.76 348% -5% 15.59 76.26 67.38 389% -12%
Middle Section 12-Kragero Overflow 57.28 45.27 45.20 -21% 0% 142.30 148.07 141.62 4% -4% 190.63 223.08 199.82 17% -10%
Total 63.13 74.88 74.81 19% 0% 154.74 203.82 194.38 32% -5% 206.22 299.34 267.20 45% -11%
Culvert#1 8.21 18.91 28.08 130% 49% 30.36 52.20 75.19 72% 44% 49.51 77.02 105.36 56% 37%
Culvert#2 22.94 18.91 28.08 -18% 49% 49.71 52.20 75.19 5% 44% 64.88 77.02 105.36 19% 37%
Culvert#3 22.67 18.91 9.69 -17% -49% 46.59 52.20 25.44 12% -51% 60.44 77.02 35.79 27% -54%
140th Avenue NW
Culvert#4 14.07 18.91 9.69 34% -49% 37.54 52.20 25.44 39% -51% 53.27 77.02 35.79 45% -54%
Total 67.88 75.63 75.54 11% 0% 164.20 208.79 201.25 27% -4% 228.09 308.07 282.31 35% -8%
Culvert#1 18.12 24.50 29.20 35% 19% 34.57 56.00 63.95 62% 14% 40.06 70.14 73.41 75% 5%
Culvert#2 18.16 24.50 18.53 35% -24% 32.37 56.00 46.79 73% -16% 37.07 70.14 67.29 89% -4%
80th Street NW
Total 36.28 49.00 47.73 35% -3% 66.94 112.00 110.74 67% -1% 77.14 140.29 140.70 82% 0%
Open Channel 61.87 61.96 61.96 0% 0% 180.46 182.41 182.42 1% 0% 279.84 283.79 283.78 1% 0%
Middle Branch 1 Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 2.13 0.00 0.00 -100% N/A
Total 61.87 61.96 61.96 0% 0% 180.46 182.41 182.42 1% 0% 281.96 283.79 283.78 1% 0%
Open Channel 50.67 50.59 50.59 0% 0% 149.93 150.23 150.23 0% 0% 235.29 235.21 235.21 0% 0%
Beginning Open Ditch Branch 1 Overflow N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 50.67 50.59 50.59 0% 0% 149.93 150.23 150.23 0% 0% 235.29 235.21 235.21 0% 0%
Denotes peak flows less than or
equal to existing
Table 4 below summaries the peak elevation summary from the 2-dimensional models. As shown, the peak elevations are generally lower in the
upper portions of the ditch system under the proposed scenarios as the ditch repairs allow more water to flow downstream. As a result, peak
elevations slightly increase downstream with the added water. However, under the repair alternative scenario, the elevations are reduced from
the legal conditions downstream as the floodplain culverts provide additional storage to reduce the peak flooding downstream.

Table 4: Peak Elevation Comparison For 2D Model Simulations
2-year 5-year 10-year
Legal Legal Legal
Location Existing Repair Alt Difference Difference Existing Repair Alt Difference Difference Existing Repair Alt Difference Difference
Repair Repair Repair
(MSL) (MSL) (Ex-Legal) (Legal-Alt) (MSL) (MSL) (Ex-Legal) (Legal-Alt) (MSL) (MSL) (Ex-Legal) (Legal-Alt)
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
Ditch Outlet 989.50 989.65 989.66 0.15 0.01 990.10 990.21 990.19 0.11 -0.02 990.36 990.46 990.42 0.10 -0.04
40th Street NW 990.11 990.29 990.29 0.18 0.00 990.81 991.06 990.95 0.25 -0.11 991.11 991.44 991.24 0.32 -0.19
110th Avenue NW 991.06 991.17 991.18 0.11 0.01 991.45 991.61 991.55 0.16 -0.06 991.69 991.92 991.81 0.23 -0.11
Upstream WMA Areas 991.98 991.99 992.00 0.01 0.01 992.39 992.41 992.41 0.02 0.00 992.59 992.66 992.64 0.06 -0.02
120th Avenue NW 992.90 992.92 992.86 0.02 -0.06 993.84 993.90 993.85 0.06 -0.05 994.26 994.39 994.31 0.13 -0.07
Downstream DNR Basin 993.91 993.93 993.86 0.02 -0.07 994.50 994.52 994.48 0.02 -0.04 994.80 994.89 994.82 0.09 -0.07
60th Street NW (HWY 40) 994.14 994.19 994.18 0.06 -0.02 994.66 994.73 994.63 0.07 -0.10 994.99 995.12 994.95 0.13 -0.17
130th Avenue NW 994.26 994.28 994.27 0.02 -0.02 995.07 995.09 994.98 0.02 -0.11 995.57 995.60 995.40 0.02 -0.20
Middle Section 13-Kragero 995.17 994.93 994.92 -0.24 0.00 995.67 995.70 995.69 0.03 -0.01 995.93 996.07 995.94 0.14 -0.13
70th Street NW 995.90 995.67 995.69 -0.24 0.02 996.83 996.53 996.65 -0.30 0.12 997.36 996.94 997.14 -0.42 0.19
Middle Section 12-Kragero 996.28 996.18 996.18 -0.10 0.00 997.01 996.89 996.92 -0.12 0.03 997.47 997.27 997.34 -0.21 0.07
140th Avenue NW 997.64 997.06 997.09 -0.58 0.04 998.66 997.77 998.00 -0.88 0.23 999.40 998.34 998.71 -1.06 0.38
80th Street NW 998.75 998.36 998.39 -0.39 0.03 999.56 999.20 999.23 -0.37 0.04 1000.01 999.67 999.70 -0.35 0.03
Beginning Open Ditch Branch 1 1003.39 1002.40 1002.40 -1.00 0.00 1004.75 1004.08 1004.08 -0.67 0.00 1005.47 1005.07 1005.07 -0.40 0.00
PUBLIC UTILITY, BENEFIT, OR WELFARE

In accordance with Section 103E.015, Subd. 2, and on behalf of the Drainage Authority, the Engineer has throughout this report proceeded to
consider whether the present petitioned repair will be of public utility, benefit, or welfare.
The Engineer would have the reader be aware of the following as evidence of the required process of consideration:
1. Early coordination with the WCA-TEP helped guide the extent of repair within and adjacent to public owned lands and multiple wetlands.
2. While channel cleaning in this repair will increase the efficiency of JCD 9’s ditches to convey drainage base flow, downstream properties
will be protected from increased peak flows through the use of floodplain culverts.
3. A head-cut structure is included as part of the repair project to prevent the DNR PWI Basin from a full drain out.
4. The proposed repair design complies with WCA, USCOE, and DNR requirements and still provides adequate drainage to the JCD 9
watershed.
Having applied appropriate consideration, the Engineer believes that the Petitioned Repair will be of public utility, benefit, and welfare.
REPAIR COST ESTIMATE - SUMMARY

The proposed repair will clean accumulated sediment and cattails from the majority of the mainline open ditch. Overall, the hydraulics will be
greatly increased from the existing conditions and will provide the JCD 9 ditch system with nearly its entire benefit. Table 5 summarizes the cost
of the repair project. Given the difficult nature of this project spanning through wetland complexes, incomplete as-built drainage records, lack
of ditch system maintenance over the past 100-years, and other permitting requirements; additional engineering services were needed in order
to legally permit the project for repairs. Detailed cost estimates are included in Appendix C.

Table 5: Repair Cost Estmate
ITEM NO ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
101 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 113,230.00 $ 113,230
102 CLEAR AND GRUB TREE (OVER 6") EA 20 $ 450.00 $ 9,000
103 SLOUGH REPAIR LF 2000 $ 7.00 $ 14,000
CLEAN AND REMOVE SPOILS W/O MATS (3' WIDE DITCH
104 LF 4470 $ 12.00 $ 53,640
BOTTOM)
CLEAN AND REMOVE SPOILS W/ MATS (3' WIDE DITCH
105 LF 19715 $ 22.00 $ 433,730
BOTTOM THROUGH WETLAND AREAS)
106 SPOIL LEVELING AC 13 $ 2,700.00 $ 35,100
107 STANDARD DITCH CLEANING (3' WIDE DITCH BOTTOM) LF 5750 $ 2.10 $ 12,075
108 ARMOR TILE OUTLET (RIPRAP & GEOTEXTILE FABRIC) EA 50 $ 630.00 $ 31,500
109 CLASS III RIPRAP WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CY 224 $ 85.00 $ 19,040
110 INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL LF 140 $ 3.00 $ 420
111 INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATS LF 22755 $ 18.00 $ 409,590
112 TOPSOIL STRIPPING (12-INCHES)(EV) AC 6 $ 4,200.00 $ 25,200
SEED MIX 25-142 W/MNDOT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
113 SY 500 $ 3.50 $ 1,750
CATEGORY 3
TOTAL OPEN DITCH CONSTRUCTION COST $ 1,158,275
114 COMMON EXCAVATION AND SPOIL REMOVAL CY 45 $ 12.00 $ 540
115 BACKFILL (COMMON BORROW) CY 57 $ 18.00 $ 1,026
116 1/2" X 10' REBAR STAKE ANCHORS EA 60 $ 100.00 $ 6,000
117 4' X 10' HOG SLAT (WITH CRUSHED ROCK BASE EA 15 $ 475.00 $ 7,125
TOTAL HEAD CUT STRUCTURE COST $ 17,581
119 REMOVE EXISTING 48-INCH CMP CULVERT EA 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500
121 OPEN CUT & RESTORE GRAVEL ROAD OR DRIVEWAY EA 3 $ 1,698.50 $ 5,096
122 GRANULAR FOUNDATION CY 130 $ 18.00 $ 2,340
123 48-INCH CLASS III RCP PIPE LF 48 $ 315.00 $ 15,120
125 48-INCH RCP APRON EA 2 $ 2,100.00 $ 4,200
126 36-INCH RCP APRON EA 12 $ 1,250.00 $ 15,000
TOTAL ROAD AUTHORITY COST $ 88,866
20% Unforeseen $ 252,944
SUBTOTAL $ 1,517,666
TEMPORARY DAMAGES (MAT AREAS) AC 18.8 $ 100 $ 1,884
TEMPORARY DAMAGES (STRIPPING AND LEVELING AREAS) AC 13.0 $ 650 $ 8,450
WETLAND MITIGATION $ 7,000
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COSTS $ 30,354
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY $ 75,250
REPORTS, PERMIT APPLICATIONS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS $ 294,350
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND STAKING $ 106,237
TOTAL OPEN DITCH REPAIR COST ESTIMATE REPAIR COST $ 2,041,191
The total ditch repair cost for JCD 9 is approximately $2,041,191. The open ditch repairs are estimated at $1,158,275 with $17,581 attributed
to the head cut structure and $88,866 towards road crossings. A 20 percent contingency was also added to the cost estimate for unforeseen
complications during construction.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, + RECOMMENDATIONS

The JCD 9 mainline open ditch is plugged with substantial amounts of sediment and cattail overgrowth. The culverts under roadways in the
upper half of the drainage system are in poor condition and are well above legal ditch grade. Culverts under three roadways will be repaired to
restore the baseflow through the system. Culverts in the lower half of the mainline ditch are in good shape and will not be repaired at this time.
There are wetlands and public lands along the JCD 9 alignment which required the repair to be designed to comply with WCA, USCOE, and DNR
requirements. As a result, a full ditch cleanout is not planned and repairs will only occur where there are major flow restrictions. Only three
culvert crossings will be repaired, but those repairs will not increase system capacity. The ditches will be cleaned, sloughs repaired, and tile
inlets will be repaired and protected.
Due to the repair, the system will be able to more effectively handle the drainage base flow. There will be limited impact to wetlands as compared
to the conditions that existed 25-years ago due to the protective construction methods being used. The hydrology of public lands and wetlands
will be sustained or enhanced.

In accordance with Section 103E.715 REPAIR BY PETITION, Subd. 2, Whereas the engineer has ascertained the As Constructed or Subsequently
Improved Condition (ACSIC) of the System, and whereas the engineer has shown the necessary repairs, and whereas the engineer has shown
the proposed repair to be of public utility, benefit, and welfare per Section 103E.015, Subd. 2, and whereas the engineer has provided estimated
costs of the repairs, and whereas the engineer has, on behalf of the drainage authority, investigated potential external sources of funds and
technical assistance, and whereas the engineer has provided plans for the repair, therefore the engineer recommends the proposed repair
project to the Drainage Authority for approval.

Appendix A: Preliminary Repair Plans
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix A

CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY DITCH No. 9
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR: ISG PROJECT # 15-18675
PREFERRED REPAIR ALTERNATIVE
LEGEND M I N ARY CTION
LI U
EXISTING PRE CONSTR
OR
CITY LIMITS SHEET INDEX N OT F
SECTION LINE 1 TITLE
QUARTER SECTION LINE 2 NOTES & QUANTITIES
3 DETAILS
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
4 DETAILS
PROPERTY / LOTLINE 5 DETAILS
EASEMENT LINE 6 DNR STRUCTURE DETAILS
ACCESS CONTROL 7 JOINT COUNTY DITCH No. 9 OVERALL WATERSHED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
8 REPAIR OVERVIEW
WATER EDGE REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
9 SPOIL PLACEMENT NORTH SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
WETLAND BOUNDARY 10 SPOIL PLACEMENT SOUTH PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
WETLAND / MARSH 11 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE CHARLES J. BRANDEL
FENCE LINE 12 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE
13 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE
CULVERT
STORM SEWER DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
SANITARY SEWER 16 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN 17 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
18 BRANCH 1 PLAN & PROFILE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
WATER
19 BRANCH 1 PLAN & PROFILE
GAS 20 DNR BASIN PROFILE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 21 DNR BASIN PROFILE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 22 70TH STREET CULVERT
DATE LIC. NO.
23 140TH AVENUE CULVERT
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
24 140TH AVENUE CULVERT THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
UNDERGROUND TV AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
25 80TH STREET CULVERT WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
OVERHEAD UTILITY
UNDERGROUND UTILITY PROJECT
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC

990 CONTOUR (MAJOR)
989 CONTOUR (MINOR)
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT 6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND
DECIDUOUS TREE DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED,
OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO
CONIFEROUS TREE
TREE LINE
(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS
AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND
MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF
DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS
JOINT COUNTY
MANHOLE/STRUCTURE
ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED
BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.
AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE DITCH No. 9
WORK.
CATCH BASIN 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL
SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN 7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
HYDRANT COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC
REVISION SCHEDULE
AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. CORROSION.
VALVE DATE DESCRIPTION BY
3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER 8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES
CURB STOP SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF
POWER POLE OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. THE KNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY
UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET 4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY
THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE
DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY
UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROPOSED DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION
IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR
OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
LOT LINE VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.
5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF
9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE
RIGHT OF WAY THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED
ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS
THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR PROJECT NO. 15-18675
EASEMENT LOCATION MAP IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC
DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION
(1-800-252-1166). CAD FILE NAME 18675 TITLE
DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE
CULVERT DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE DRAWN BY JAG
STORM SEWER PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. DESIGNED BY MAO
STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) REVIEWED BY CJB
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY SEWER (PIPE WIDTH)
PROJECT INDEX: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.

12/21/2018
WATER SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE

GAS OWNER: PROJECT MANAGING OFFICE: TITLE
ADDRESS / LOCATION: ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE COUNTY OF B.M. ELEVATION=1023.08
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CHIPPEWA REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD
0.2 MILES WEST OF INTERSECTION OF CR 34
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CHIPPEWA AND SWIFT JOINT SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2016 EDITION, AND THE
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM & RUNK HWY 40 71.3 FT SOUTH OF TRUNK HWY
UNDERGROUND TV COUNTY DRAINAGE AUTHORITY SEC: 1-3, 10-15, 23-26 DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, UNLESS DIRECTED 40 1 FT EAST OF THE CENTER OF THE ENTERANCE TITLE
1015 CONTOUR 629 NORTH ELEVENTH STREET KRAGERO TWP MANKATO OFFICE
OTHERWISE.
MANHOLE MONTEVIDEO, MN 56265 SEC: 6-7, 18-20, 28-33 115 E HICKORY STREET PROJECT DATUM
CATCH BASIN BIG BEND TWP SUITE 300 HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE
MANKATO, MN 56001 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT
HYDRANT PHONE: 507.387.6651 (NAD83(1996)) ON THE CHIPPEWA COUNTY COORDINATE
SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET
VALVE CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MINNESOTA FAX: 507.387.3583 ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH
1
AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS
PROJECT MANAGER: CHUCK BRANDEL RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL OF DATA COLLECTED IN JANUARY 2017 BY ISG.
EMAIL: CHUCK.BRANDEL@IS-GRP.COM AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT.
OF 25
GENERAL OPEN DITCH NOTES:
1. DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A DRAINAGE OUTLET FOR THE ENTIRE CHIPPEWA JCD 9 SYSTEM.
M I N ARY CTION
L I U
2. AREAS WHERE A 16.5-FOOT GRASS STRIP DOES NOT EXIST OR HAS BEEN DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PLANTED AFTER ALL WORK HAS PRE CONSTR
OR
BEEN COMPLETED IN THAT AREA, & SHALL COMPLY TO SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINED IN THE SPEC BOOK. THESE AREAS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. N OT F
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO WITHIN A 20- FOOT WIDE BUFFER AREA ALONG DITCH ALIGNMENTS.
DISTURBANCE THROUGH ROAD CROSSINGS, ROAD DITCHES, AND GRASS BUFFERS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE WIDTH OF A TRENCH NECESSARY FOR SAFE
CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES.
4. ALL EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO SPARE SOIL TYPES. TOP SOIL SHALL BE REPLACED BAKE ON TOP OF COMPACTED BACKFILL AND
TOP TWO (2) FEET SHALL BE LEFT UN-COMPACTED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. EXCAVATED SPOILS SHALL BE SPREAD EVENLY IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS AS TO
NOT IMPEDE DRAINAGE. ALL EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE TO KEEP TOPSOIL ON TOP. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
5. PLACE ALL SPOILS FROM DITCH CLEANING ON LOWER SIDE OF THE DITCH NO WIDER THAN 16.5-FOOT WIDE FROM TOP OF SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. SPOIL LEVELING/GRADING IS INCIDENTAL TO OPEN DITCH CLEANING. STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
6. TOP SOIL IN SPOIL AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS, SHALL BE STRIPPED PRIOR SPOIL PLACEMENT.
7. MINOR SHAPING AROUND SIDE INTAKES, WASCOBs & CULVERT INLETS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THESE RESPECTIVE PAY ITEMS.
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
8. EXISTING TILES AT OUTLETS MAY BE SALVAGED, REUSED, & PROTECTED WITH RIPRAP IF THE OUTLET IS DEEMED IN GOOD SHAPE, BY THE ENGINEER. TILE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPAIR AT THESE LOCATIONS SHALL BE PAID FOR AS BID ITEM "ARMOR TILE". SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
9. ANY EXISTING TILES IN OPEN DITCH, INCLUDING ANY NOT ON PLANS, SHALL BE REPAIRED WITH RIPRAP, GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, RODENT GUARD, & 20 LF OF
SPECIFIED PIPE SIZE WHERE NEEDED. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTE, HDPE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL FOR ALL TILE REPAIRS, (SEE DETAIL AG440)
10. ANY ROAD CROSSING REPAIRS SHALL BE CLASS III RCP ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFIED ON PLANS OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. TIE ALL PIPE SECTIONS UNDER
ROAD CROSSINGS (INCIDENTAL). DATE LIC. NO.
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.

11. MISC. TREE CLEARING OUTSIDE OF CALLED OUT AREAS ON THE PLANS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO NORMAL DITCH CLEANING. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
12. TREES LARGER THAN 6" IN DIAMETER CALLED OUT ON PLANS SHALL BE PAID FOR AS BID ITEM "CLEAR AND GRUB TREES (OVER 6")".
PROJECT
13. PROTECT & ARMOR CULVERT INCLUDES RIPRAP ON TYPE IV FABRIC AND SHALL BE PAID FOR BY CY OF RIPRAP, FABRIC & GRADING ARE INCIDENTAL
14. ALL SPOILS FROM OPEN CHANNEL CLEANING MUST BE HAULED OUT OF WETLAND AREAS AND PLACED IN IDENTIFIED BORROW AREAS. WHERE INDICATED AS "
CLEAN AND REMOVE SPOILS" CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
15. SPOIL PLACEMENT AREAS SHOWN MUST BE ACCESSED FOR SPOIL PLACEMENT ONLY AND HAULING ROUTES MUST FOLLOW SHORTEST PATH TO THOSE
AREAS. NO TOPSOIL STRIPPING WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PLACEMENT ON TOP OF LIGHT OR SAND SOILS. LEVELING OF SPOILS IS REQUIRED AFTER SPOIL
PLACEMENT AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 8-INCHES THICK , SPOILS SHALL BE SPREAD IN A UNIFORM MANNER. ACTUAL FILL AREA TO BE DETERMINED BY
JOINT COUNTY
ENGINEER AND LANDOWNERS AND WILL BE FLAGGED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. DITCH No. 9
16. CONSTRUCTION MATS ARE REQUIRED FOR ACCESS AND CLEANING THROUGH WETLAND AREAS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MOBILIZATION, CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL MATS USED FOR OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND ARE PAID FOR BY LINEAR FOOT OF MATS ALONG THE OPEN
REVISION SCHEDULE
DITCH CLEANING. EXTRA MATS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OR SPOIL PLACEMENT AREAS AND WILL BE PAID FOR BY LINEAR FOOT.
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
17. DITCH CLEANING FROM ROADWAYS WILL BE ALLOWED IN AREAS IDENTIFIED AS "DITCH CLEANING & SPOIL HAULING". IN THESE AREAS CONSTRUCTION MATS
ARE NOT REQUIRED AND WORK WILL BE PAID OR IN BID ITEM " DITCH CLEANING, SPOIL HAULING". ACTUAL LENGTHS WILL VARY BASED ON SIZE CONDITION AT
THAT TIME. IF CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLEANING FROM ROADWAY, CONSTRUCTION MATS MAY BE USED AND WILL BE PAID FOR BY LINEAR FOOT OF
CLEANING & FOR INSTALLATION & REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATS.
18. CONSTRUCTION PHASES WERE DEVELOPED FOR PURPOSES OF ACCESS TO CLEANING AND HAULING AREAS BASED ON TIME PERIODS OF FLOW FROM THE
JCD9 WATERSHED. PHASE LENGTHS MAY VARY BY MAT LENGTH DURING CONSTRUCTION BUT NO EXTRA PAYMENT WILL BE AUTHORIZED FROM PHASES
VARYING SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE PHASES PROVIDED IN THESE PLANS.
PROJECT NO. 15-18675
19. ALL DEWATERING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF JCD 9 INCLUDED IN THESE PLANS IS INCIDENTAL TO ALL BID ITEMS. CAD FILE NAME 18675 NOTES & QUANTITIES
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
TITLE
NOTES &
QUANTITIES
SHEET
2 OF 25
NOTE: ALL TILE OUTLETS AND FIELD INTAKES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR PROTECTED
BUFFER AREA BUFFER AREA
(MIN. 16.5') (MIN. 16.5') BUFFER AREA BUFFER AREA
(MIN. 16.5') (MIN. 16.5')
REESTABLISH ORIGINAL DITCH SIDESLOPES

AFTER TILE INSTALLATION PROPOSED GRADE
(PLACE SOUGH MATERIAL FROM DITCH BOTTOM TO
MATCH ORIGINAL DITCH SIDESLOPES IF POSSIBLE)
RODENT GUARD, TYP.

Y
L I M INARRUCTION
NOTES: PRE CONST
TILE JOINT BETWEEN FIELD TILE & OUTLET SECTION FOR
PLACE RIPRAP AND FABRIC
AT TILE OUTLET (INCIDENTAL)
SHALL BE WRAPPED IN TYPE I FABRIC AND NOT
CONCRETE, OR CONNECTED WITH APPROPRIATE
(SEE DETAIL AG640)
FITTINGS, IF APPROVED BY ENGINEER.
BRANCH OR PRIVATE
RIPRAP AT OUTLET SHALL NOT IMPEDE FLOW FROM EXISTING SLOUGH OR DITCH BANK
TILE OUTLET TO DITCH, TYP.
PIPE. RIPRAP AT OUTLET SHALL ALSO EXTEND
ABOVE & ALONG SIDES.
INSTALL 20 LF (MIN) NEW H.D.P.E. DUAL WALL OR CMP PIPE FOR ALL TILES DEEMED SATISFACTORY SHALL BE LEFT
TILE OUTLETS INTO DITCH WHERE DAMAGED, TYP. INPLACE, ARMORED WITH CLASS III RIPRAP ON LEGAL DITCH GRADE
TYPE 3 FABRIC & HAVE A RODENT GUARD CLEAN SLOUGHED MATERIAL FROM DITCH BOTTOM (BOTTOM VARIES)
INSTALLED. THESE SHALL BE PAID FOR AS PAY (MATCH EXISTING GRADES) (SEE PROFILES)
ITEM "ARMOR TILES".
ALL TILE REPAIR/REPLACEMENT SHALL BE PAID BY
LEGAL DITCH GRADE REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
THE EACH PER DETAIL SHOWN. SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
(BOTTOM VARIES)
(SEE PROFILES) RODENT GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL TILE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
REPAIRS 18" AND SMALLER, AND ARE INCIDENTAL STATE OF MINNESOTA.
TO THE PAY ITEM.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
ALL FITTINGS TO CONNECT EXISTING TILE SHALL BE
INCIDENTAL TO TILE OUTLET REPAIR.
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

TYPICAL TILE OUTLET REPAIR TYPICAL DITCH SIDESLOPE REPAIR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
NTS AG450 NTS AG440 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.

AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
NOTES: CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE AND THICKNESS WILL BE DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS
REVISION SCHEDULE
1. FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 1.5'-2' DATE DESCRIPTION BY
2. THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS OPTION, MAY SUBSTITUTE A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, SPEC. 3601 FOR THE
GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET. THE FABRIC SHOULD COVER THE FILTER BLANKET. THE FABRIC
SHOULD COVER THE PIPE BY 3'.
DIMENSIONS
PIPE DIA. RIPRAP
12" TO 18" 4 CY CLASS III

PROPOSED PIPE RIPRAP PROJECT NO. 15-18675
CAD FILE NAME 18675 DETAILS
DRAWN BY JAG
1'(1) 54" & UP 20 CY CLASS IV DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB

GRANULAR FILTER
BLANKET (2)
TITLE
TYPICAL TILE OUTLET

NTS AG530
DETAILS
SHEET
3 OF 25
ADJUST TOP OF DITCH AS
NECESSARY
1
FULLY RESTORE ORIGINAL 1:1
1 SIDESLOPE WHERE POSSIBLE
DEPTH VARIES
EXISTING SIDESLOPE CLEANOUT SLOUGHED MATERIAL
M I N ARY CTION
RESTORE EXISTING L I U
LEGAL GRADE PRE CONSTR
OR
N OT F
WIDTH VARIES

NOTE: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
BOTTOM13 NEED NOT BE RESEEDED CHARLES J. BRANDEL
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

TYPICAL DITCH CLEANING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
NTS AG420 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

33' CONSTRUCTION LIMIT WIDTH VARIES
JOINT COUNTY
EXISTING GROUND ADJUST TOP OF DITCH AS
NECESSARY
DITCH No. 9
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
REVISION SCHEDULE
CLEANOUT SPOIL MATERIAL DATE DESCRIPTION BY
MATS FOR TURNAROUND INSTALL CONSTRUCTION

AND ACCESS ALLOWED MATS NO GREATER THAN
UP TO 33' FROM TOP OF 20' FROM TOP OF DITCH
DITCH FOR CLEANING AND
HAULING
DEPTH VARIES
RESTORE ORIGINAL 1:1
SIDE SLOPE OR FLATTEN
TO MATCH ADJACENT PROJECT NO. 15-18675
BACK SLOPES
1 DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
1 REVIEWED BY CJB
DO NOT OVERCUT SIDESLOPES

TITLE
3'
DETAILS
DITCH CLEANING THROUGH WETLAND AREAS

NTS AG420.1
SHEET
4 OF 25
FIELD CROSSING AGGREGATE SECTION
6" MnDOT CL. 5 AGGREGATE SURFACING
(GRAVEL ROAD AGGREGATE SECTION, SEE DETAIL AG700)
SLOPE @ .02'/FT.
TYP. DITCH SLOPE
3 MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP
1 ON MnDOT TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP
ON MnDOT TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE)
2 TYP. ROAD DITCH SLOPE
(SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE) 1
10" MnDOT CLASS V AGGREGATE WITH QUALITY CULVERT
M I N ARY CTION
L I U
COMPACTION PRE CONSTR
OR
OT F
TOP OF RIPRAP
DIRECTION OF FLOW @ DITCH FLOW LINE N
MnDOT TYPE V GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE 2 FOOT WIDE IMPERVIOUS CLAY RCP DITCH CULVERT
MATERIAL (DEPTH VARIES) PLUG @ END OF PIPE BEDDING (TIE ALL SECTIONS)
(8" LIFTS) (TYP. BOTH ENDS)
SECTION
NTS
6" GRANULAR BACKFILL AROUND REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
PROPOSED PIPE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
PROPOSED PIPE CONSTRUCT FIELD CROSSING OR ROAD AGGREGATE CHARLES J. BRANDEL
(SIZE VARIES) TO MATCH EXISTING CROSSING WIDTH, UNLESS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN PLANS. FIELD CROSSING
6" GRANULAR BEDDING UNDER
PROPOSED PIPE DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
TOP OF DITCH SLOPE
EXISTING GROUND END OF CROSSING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
AGGREAGATE SURF. REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP STATE OF MINNESOTA.
ON MnDOT TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE)
DETAIL A 8'
TOE OF DITCH SLOPE VARIES
14'
DATE LIC. NO.

DIRECTION OF FLOW AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
DIRECTION OF FLOW WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT
14'
16'
(SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE) CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
DITCH CULVERT 15' 20'
VARIES VARIES
JOINT COUNTY
REPAIR CROSSING OR ROAD AS REQUIRED OR CONST.
FIELD CROSSING AGGREGATE SURFACING TO
DITCH No. 9
EVEN WITH TOP OF DITCH SLOPES
DETAIL A CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
GRASS SHOULDER REVISION SCHEDULE

VARIES VARIES PLAN
(GRADE VARIES) DATE DESCRIPTION BY
NTS
RIPRAP QUANTITY
EQUIVALENT SIZE UPSTREAM - DOWNSTREAM
<48" 10 CY - 20 CY

DRAWN BY JAG
NOTES:
SECTION DESIGNED BY MAO
OPEN DITCH CULVERTS MUST BE WATERTIGHT, GASKETED, AND TONGUE AND
REVIEWED BY CJB
GROOVE DESIGN CONFORMING TO MnDOT 3006F.
SEE TYPICAL ROAD SECTION DETAIL AG700.
NOTES: AGGREGATE SURFACE IS INCIDENTAL TO CROSSING OR ROAD RESTORATION. CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
1. ADDITIONAL CLASS III AGGREGATE MAY BE NEEDED TO MEET MINIMUM 10" DEPTH. TIE ALL RCP PIPE SECTIONS (INCIDENTAL TO CROSSING).
2. SEE DISTURBED GRASS SHOULDER WITH MnDOT 25-142 WITH MnDOT CATEGORY 3 TITLE
RIPRAP QUANTITIES ESTIMATED (AS SHOWN IN TABLE). ADDITIONAL QUANTITY MAY BE
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.
REQUIRED BY ENGINEER AND/OR SHOWN ON PLANS. ALL RIPRAP QUANTITIES SHALL
3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED ROADS UNTIL THE BE PAID BY CY INSTALLED.
PROJECT IS COMPLETED OR ROAD AUTHORITY HAS RESUMED CONTROL; WHICHEVER
ADDITIONAL RIPRAP NEEDED FOR CULVERTS LARGER THAN 48". REFER TO SCHEDULE
IS SOONER
FOR DIMENSIONS.
DETAILS
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION TYPICAL FIELD OR ROAD CROSSING
NTS AG700 NTS AG710
SHEET
5 OF 25
---- ---- 6
M I NARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
R
NO T FO

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

CROSS SECTION VIEW HOG SLAT STRUCTURE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,

INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
PROJECT
PLAN VIEW HOG SLAT STRUCTURE

CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY

FILE NAME 18675-DNR STRUCTURE DETAIL
DRAWN BY ---
DESIGNED BY ---
REVIEWED BY ---
PROFILE VIEW HOG SLAT STRUCTURE ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
TITLE
DNR STRUCTURE
DETAILS
· SHEET
·
6 DNR STRUCTURE DETAILS
6 OF 25
BRANCH 1
4 3 2 1 6 5
APPROXIMATE JD9
OVERALL WATERSHED
AREA= 17,200 ACRES
80TH ST NW
0 1500 3000 4500
SCALE IN FEET
BEGINNING OF
JCD NO. 9 OPEN DITCH
MA
IN
LIN
CSAH 10 / 150TH AVE NW
E
ARY CTION
160TH AVE NW
LI M I N U
10 11 12 7 8 PRE CONSTR
OR
N OT F
70TH ST NW

SPOIL
AREA PLACEMENT
#1

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
140TH AVE NW
15 14 13 18 17 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
MILAN STATE OF MINNESOTA.
TH 40 / 60TH ST NW
DATE LIC. NO.

PUBLIC WATER BASIN
ID# 12009400 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
CR 34 / 110TH AVE NW
PROJECT
23 24 19 20 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
130TH AVE NW
DNR HEAD CUT STRUCTURE
(SEE DETAIL)
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
50TH ST NW
TH
7

REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
MA
IN
LIN
E
100TH AVE NW
26 25 30 29 28
120TH AVE NW
CAD FILE NAME 18675 TITLE
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
CR 12 / 40TH ST NW REVIEWED BY CJB
TITLE
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
31 32 33 OVERALL
END OF LEGAL DITCH
WATERSHED
SHEET
7
30TH ST NW
OF 25
LEGEND
BRANCH 1 EXISTING OPEN DITCH
OPEN DITCH CLEANING

THROUGH WETLAND AREA
STANDARD OPEN DITCH
3 2 1 6 5 CLEANING
OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND
SPOIL HAULING
STANDARD DITCH CLEANING APPROXIMATE JD9
OVERALL WATERSHED
AREA = 17,200 ACRES
OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND SPOIL HAULING

80TH ST NW
PHASE 13 SPOIL PLACEMENT

PHASE 12
AREA #11, 12 & 13
M I N ARY CTION
LI U
REPLACE & LOWER CULVERT PHASE 11 PRE CONSTR
OR
REPLACE & LOWER CULVERTS N OT F
MA
0 1200 2400 3600
IN
LIN
PHASE 10
E
SCALE IN FEET
SPOIL PLACEMENT
160TH AVE NW
AREA #10
10 11 12 7 8
SPOIL PLACEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA.
PHASE 9 AREA #8 & 9 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
PHASE 8
70TH ST NW
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
SPOIL PLACEMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
AREA #7 PHASE 7 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
REPLACE & LOWER CULVERT
SPOIL
AREA PLACEMENT
#1
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SPOIL PLACEMENT
OPEN DITCH CLEANING AREA #5 & 6
THROUGH WETLAND AREA PHASE 6
DATE LIC. NO.

140TH AVE NW
15 14 13 PHASE 5 18 17 WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT
SPOIL PLACEMENT
AREA #4
MILAN CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
REPLACE CULVERT
PHASE 4
TH 40 / 60TH ST NW JOINT COUNTY

DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PUBLIC WATER BASIN
ID# 12009400
23 24 19 20
130TH AVE NW PHASE 3 SPOIL PLACEMENT
DNR HEAD CUT STRUCTURE AREA # 2 & 3 PROJECT NO. 15-18675
(SEE DETAIL) CAD FILE NAME 18675 TITLE
OPEN DITCH CLEANING DRAWN BY JAG
THROUGH WETLAND AREAS PHASE 2 DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
50TH ST NW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018

TH
7

OPEN DITCH CLEANING SPOIL PLACEMENT
AND SPOIL HAULING AREA # 1 TITLE
PHASE 1
MA
INL
REPAIR OVERVIEW
INE
100TH AVE NW
26 25 30 29 28
120TH AVE NW
SHEET
8 OF 25
OYEN, MARTIN C
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL 227.09 AC LEGEND
243.92 AC
PHASE 13
EXISTING OPEN DITCH
80TH ST NW OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND SPOIL
HAULING THROUGH WETLAND AREA
STANDARD OPEN DITCH
CLEANING
SPOIL PLACEMENT OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND
SPOIL HAULING
PHASE # 11 & 12
JOHNSON, THOMAS W
12 120 AC
S E
A
PH
11
JOHNSON, THOMAS W JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY
E
AS
160 AC 160 AC I N ARY CTION
PH
LI M U
PRE CONSTR
MA
OR
OT F
IN
N
LIN
E
JOHNSON, ERIK 0 500 1000 1500
80 AC
SCALE IN FEET
0
11 1 SPOIL PLACEMENT
E
12 7
S PHASE # 10 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
A
H JOHNSON, CONNIE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
P 20 AC
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

JOHNSON, BERGEN D & BESS Y REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
60 AC SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
E 9 SPOIL PLACEMENT
A S PHASE # 8 & 9
PH DATE LIC. NO.
JOHNSON, PAUL THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
58 AC AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
PROJECT
70TH ST NW
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
PHASE 8
JOINT COUNTY
SPOIL PLACEMENT
PHASE #7 SANDVEN, LEROY DITCH No. 9
160 AC CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
REVISION SCHEDULE
SPOIL PLACEMENT
SPOIL
AREA PLACEMENT
#1
JOHNSON, DOROTHY D PHASE # 5 & 6

DATE DESCRIPTION BY
160 AC
E 7
AS
PH PROJECT NO. 15-18675
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
14
13 P HA
SE6 JOHNSON, DALE T
142.56 AC 18 TITLE
STATE OF MINNESOTA SPOIL PLACEMENT

140TH AVE NW
82.04 AC
NORTH
SPOILS PLACEMENT
#4
5
SHEET
E
AS
9
PH
OF 25
STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOHNSON, DALE TMOLDEN, VIRGENE & LINDA ETAL
82.04 AC 230.00 AC LEGEND
142.56 AC TH 40 / 60TH ST NW
E4
EXISTING OPEN DITCH
AS OPEN DITCH CLEANING

PH THROUGH WETLAND AREA
STANDARD OPEN DITCH
CLEANING
SPOIL HAULING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
KVISTERO, KEITH & MARLYS 75.94
80 AC PMBB FARM PARTNERSHIP, LLP
160 AC MACDONALD, KAREN E
160 AC
M I N ARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
MOEN, ARLENE LEE, RUTH ANN LIFE ESTATE ETAL N OT F
OR
95.00 AC 76.2 AC
0 500 1000 1500
19 20 SCALE IN FEET
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LEE, JONATHAN ETAL OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M CHARLES J. BRANDEL
76.5 AC 80 AC 80 AC
130TH AVE NW
DNR HEAD CUT STRUCTURE SPOILS PLACEMENT

#2 & 3
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
(SEE DETAIL) PHAS

E 3
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LEE, JONATHAN ETAL BOHM, JUDITH L ANGRIMSON, CRAIG, JAMES & JEFF DATE LIC. NO.
76.8 AC 80 AC 85 AC THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.

PROJECT
50TH ST NW
PHASE 2
SPOILS PLACEMENT #1 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M JOINT COUNTY

80 AC DITCH No. 9
LEE, RUTH ANN LIFE ESTATE ETAL CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
80 AC REVISION SCHEDULE
MA
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
INL
INE
DEUTSCH FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
80 AC

DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
30 LEE, RUTH ANN LIFE ESTATE ETAL

160 AC
29 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
12/21/2018
BAUER, DIANNE M ETAL

80 AC SPOIL PLACEMENT
120TH AVE NW
SOUTH
STATE OF MINNESOTA
KANTEN, KENT & KIM REVOC LIV TRUSTS SHEET
79.76 AC 10.12 AC 41 AC
PHASE 1 10 OF 25
991
SPRAY, PAUL J & PATRICIA
991
992
EXISTING 97"x152"
80 AC
NO CONSTRUCTION THIS SHEET
ARCH RCP 991 EXISTING TREELINE, TYP.SPRAY, DOUGLAS E
I(W)=984.96
57
61
80 AC
60
56 991
58
I(E)=983.61
59
990
0
99
994
9994
990
55
9
54
993
5
99 99
48
988 0
53
49
50
52
51
992
47
989
991 0 200 400
46
991
995 991 45 990
994
992 989 SCALE IN FEET
44
993
STATE OF MINNESOTA 996
43
24
PROFILE SCALES
23
42
41 AC 995
41
25
22
40
987
EXISTING CENTERLINE 10
39
26 Y
INA RUCTION
R
98
W
38
6
TN M
21
I
37
E L
E EXISTING 97"X152 PRE CONST
36
T R
20
TH S ARCH RCP 988
T FO
R
27
V
19
0
35
NW
NO
2/4
992
I(N)=984.44
28
18
991
1 E
CR 990
29
I(S)=983.99 20
34
E
17
30
31
VIESSMAN, WAYNE ETAL
32
V
R
33
989
TH A
990
16
T.
120 AC
15
992 988
990
0 100 200
110
14
STATE OF MINNESOTA
13
/
12
R 34
0
40 AC SCALE IN FEET
11
C
3
991
10
9
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. 99
8
0 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
7
6 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
991 992 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
5
STATE OF MINNESOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA
991
12-20-18 43359
991
4 DATE LIC. NO.
40 AC 108.73 AC 990 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
3
989 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1
0
990
99
98
9
0
-1
989
END OF LEGAL DITCH
DATE LIC. NO.
-2
EXISTING UNNAMED
STREAM OUTLET THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
-3
-4
PROJECT
DOUGLAS E SPRAY STATE OF MINNESOTA WAYNE VIESSMAN
1010 1010
NO CONSTRUCTION
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

NO CONSTRUCTION
1000
NOTE: 1000 JOINT COUNTY
XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DITCH No. 9
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) END OF LEGAL DITCH
990 990 REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)

980 980
987.15
987.13
987.11
987.09
987.07
987.05
987.03
987.01
986.99
986.97
986.95
986.93
986.91
986.89
986.87
986.85
986.83
986.81
986.79
986.77
986.75
986.73
986.71
986.69
986.67
986.5
986.7
985.9
985.6
986.6
986.9
986.0
986.8
986.8
986.7
986.6
986.5
986.5
986.5
986.4
986.3
986.3
986.2
986.2
986.1
986.0
986.0
985.9
985.9
985.8
970 24+00 23+00 22+00 21+00 20+00 19+00 18+00 17+00 16+00 15+00 14+00 13+00 12+00 11+00 10+00 9+00 8+00 7+00 6+00 5+00 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 970
STATE OF 110TH 40TH CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES
PAUL J & PATRICIA SPRAY STATE OF MINNESOTA DOUGLAS E SPRAY DRAWN BY JAG
MINNESOTA AVE NW ST NW DESIGNED BY MAO
1010 1010 REVIEWED BY CJB
NO CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.

12/21/2018
1000 1000 TITLE

110TH AVENUE NW EXISTING 97"x152" 40TH STREET NW
RCP CULVERT EXISTING 97"X152 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
I(W)=984.96 LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
I(E)=983.61
RCP CULVERT
I(N)=984.44
MAINLINE PLAN &
990 990
I(S)=983.99 PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
987.67
987.65
987.63
987.61
987.59
987.57
987.55
987.53
987.51
987.49
987.47
987.45
987.43
987.41
987.39
987.37
987.35
987.33
987.31
987.29
987.27
987.25
987.23
987.21
987.19
987.6
988.5
987.8
988.0
987.6
995.3
987.3
987.5
988.0
987.7
987.7
987.6
987.5
987.3
987.0
986.8
986.5
987.5
986.7
986.7
986.4
986.3
986.4
986.5
986.5
970 50+00 49+00 48+00 47+00 46+00 45+00 44+00 43+00 42+00 41+00 40+00 39+00 38+00 37+00 36+00 35+00 34+00 33+00 32+00 31+00 30+00 29+00 28+00 27+00 26+00 970
11 OF 25
9
99
10
2
LEE, RUTH ANN
8
10
80 AC
NO CONSTRUCTION THIS SHEET
7
10
995
6
10
105
993
992
104
992 992
103
102
101
9
100
2
991
99
98
97
96
0 200 400
95
BAUER, DIANNE M
94
99
2
994 80 AC SCALE IN FEET
93
92
993
EXISTING DITCH CENTERLINE 91 PROFILE SCALES
10
90
Y
INA RUCTION
R
999944
89
M
989
L I
PRE CONST
88
87
86 R
992
NO T FO V
85
991
20 E
R
998990
T.
987
84
LEE, RUTH ANN
989
988
0 100 200
83
82
81
991
160 AC
80
79
78
2
77
99992
76
0
75
74
STATE OF MINNESOTA SCALE IN FEET
989
73
98
992
72
71
41 AC
70
992 991 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
69
68
994 991
67
66
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
995
65
988
998
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
64
991
63
996 994
62
EXISTING TREELINE, TYP.
BAUER, DIANNE M 12-20-18 43359
57
61
99 990 988 DATE LIC. NO.
2
60
56
58
59
990 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
10.12 AC
0
99
9994
55
54
5
99
53
52
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
989
995
994
KANTEN, KENT & KIM REVOC LIV TRUST 996
993
DATE LIC. NO.
29.12 AC THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.

NOTE:
DIANNE M PROJECT
DIANNE M BAUER STATE OF MINNESOTA XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
BAUER XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NO CONSTRUCTION
1000 NOTE: 1000 JOINT COUNTY

EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DITCH No. 9
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. 980
(2016 SURVEY)
988.19
988.17
988.15
988.13
988.11
988.09
988.07
988.05
988.03
988.01
987.99
987.97
987.95
987.93
987.91
987.89
987.87
987.85
987.83
987.81
987.79
987.77
987.75
987.73
987.71
987.8
988.3
988.3
988.3
988.2
988.2
987.8
988.0
987.7
987.8
987.6
987.5
987.7
988.0
987.5
987.8
984.2
985.8
984.3
987.2
987.3
987.0
987.6
987.8
987.8
970 76+00 75+00 74+00 73+00 72+00 71+00 70+00 69+00 68+00 67+00 66+00 65+00 64+00 63+00 62+00 61+00 60+00 59+00 58+00 57+00 56+00 55+00 54+00 53+00 52+00 970
CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES
RUTH ANN LEE DIANNE M BAUER DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
NO CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
1000 1000 TITLE
EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)

LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
MAINLINE PLAN &
990 990
PROFILE
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP.
(2016 SURVEY)
980 980
SHEET
988.71
988.69
988.67
988.65
988.63
988.61
988.59
988.57
988.55
988.53
988.51
988.49
988.47
988.45
988.43
988.41
988.39
988.37
988.35
988.33
988.31
988.29
988.27
988.25
988.23
989.6
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.4
988.8
988.8
989.2
988.5
988.3
988.0
988.0
988.0
988.0
988.1
988.2
988.2
988.1
988.0
987.5
987.5
970 102+00 101+00 100+00 99+00 98+00 97+00 96+00 95+00 94+00 93+00 92+00 91+00 90+00 89+00 88+00 87+00 86+00 85+00 84+00 83+00 82+00 81+00 80+00 79+00 78+00 970
12 OF 25
995
994
993
996
NO CONSTRUCTION 130+75 TO 142+00
99998
SPOIL PLACEMENT
7
995 994 TREELINE, TYP.995
161 PHASE # 2 & 3
162
160
159
DNR STRUCTURE LOCATION
158
0
157
PHASE 3
156
MAT LOCATION
155
2
152
153
151
154
150
PHASE 2 & 3
149
ACCESS POINT
146
148
147
4
145
PUBLIC WATER BASIN
5.8
ID # 12009400
+0
144
0 200 400
=13
EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP.
143
EP
142
996
990
SCALE IN FEET
1
14
991
993
PROFILE SCALES
0
14
993
995
W
9
N
13
10
99
ET
2
ANGRIMSON, CRAIG, JAMES & JEFF Y
E INA RUCTION
R
138
2
M
99
4 PHASE 2 TR L I
PRE CONST
OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M 85 AC S
137
MAT LOCATION
99 TH T FO
R
V
993 0
50 NO
80 AC
136
20 E
SPOIL PLACEMENT R
5
13
993 999944 994
PHASE # 1 T.
4
999922 100
13
1 0 100 200
99
9
991
PHASE 2
5
998
3
13
PHASE 1
ACCESS POINT 996
LEE, RUTH ANN 0
1
ACCESS POINT SCALE IN FEET
2
13
990
99
3
993
80 AC
131
129
991 PHASE 1
130
122
99
995
12 992
5
MAT LOCATION REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
121
12
7
3
992
12
120
12 992
99
EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. 4 PHASE 1
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
119
26 ACCESS POINT CHARLES J. BRANDEL
118
1
125
99
ARMOR CULVERT
117
7
992
5
99
116
BOHM, JUDITH L 65 CY
115
992
114
998
113
80 AC 995 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
112
992
111
993
110
995 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
992
109
997
108
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
107
EXISTING DITCH CENTERLINE
106
105
992
104
103
101
102
100
5
99
12
0T
DATE LIC. NO.
LEE, RUTH ANN
HA
99
2
VE
N
992 WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
W
50TH ST NW NOTE: PROJECT
JUDITH L BOHM AND RUTH ANN LEE XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE RUTH ANN LEE
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
1010 120TH AVE NW 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
INTERSECTION OF NO CONSTRUCTION
50TH STREET NW &
1000 ARMOR CULVERT 65 CY
120TH AVENUE NW
NOTE: 1000
JOINT COUNTY
EXISTING 84"
START OPEN DITCH CONSTRUCTION
DITCH No. 9
RCP ARCH CULVERT (2) EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
I(N)=987.48 I(S)=987.15 LEGAL GRADE, TYP. CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
990
I(N)=987.51 I(S)=987.17 990 REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980 980
989.23
989.21
989.19
989.17
989.15
989.13
989.11
989.09
989.07
989.05
989.03
989.01
988.99
988.97
988.95
988.93
988.91
988.89
988.87
988.85
988.83
988.81
988.79
988.77
988.75
989.4
989.5
987.2
987.6
989.1
989.7
989.8
990.8
990.7
990.7
990.6
990.5
990.4
990.4
990.3
990.2
990.1
990.0
989.9
989.8
989.8
989.9
989.6
989.6
970 128+00 127+00 126+00 125+00 124+00 123+00 122+00 121+00 120+00 119+00 118+00 117+00 116+00 115+00 114+00 113+00 112+00 111+00 110+00 109+00 108+00 107+00 106+00 105+00 104+00 970
LAWRENCE R & INA M OLSON JUDITH L BOHM DRAWN BY JAG

DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000 TITLE

DNR STRUCTURE
MAINLINE PLAN &
990 990
PROFILE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
980 980
SHEET
989.75
989.73
989.71
989.69
989.67
989.65
989.63
989.61
989.59
989.57
989.55
989.53
989.51
989.49
989.47
989.45
989.43
989.41
989.39
989.37
989.35
989.33
989.31
989.29
989.27
991.6
991.6
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.3
990.8
990.4
990.2
990.1
990.0
989.9
989.8
989.7
989.7
970 154+00 153+00 152+00 151+00 150+00 149+00 148+00 147+00 146+00 145+00 144+00 143+00 142+00 141+00 140+00 139+00 138+00 137+00 136+00 135+00 134+00 133+00 132+00 131+00 130+00 970
13 OF 25
PHASE 4 ACCESS POINT
NO CONSTRUCTION 207+00 TO 218+00

218
2 17 MOLDEN, VIRGENE & LINDA

216 993
994 995 997
INSTALL TEMPORARY 230 AC
DITCH FLOW
JOHNSON, DALE T
8
5
21
993
996
RESTRICTION
214 1
1
142.56 AC
213
10 000
212
00
994
211
INSTALL 99
9
TEMPORARY DITCH EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP.
210
99
8
995
FLOW RESTRICTION 99
209
7
99
208
6
TURN AROUND AREA
99
EXISTING 6'X12'
207
994
5 0 200 400
BOX CULVERT
206
994
994
I(N)=989.74 993
205
SCALE IN FEET
995
I(S)=989.16
99
204
99
PROFILE SCALES
2
4
203
195
196
194
197
202
198
ARMOR CULVERT PMBB FARM PARTNERSHIP, LLP
199
200
201
PHASE 4 10
3
23 CY CLASS III RIPRAP
160 AC
19
Y
MAT LOCATION
L I M INA RUCTION
R
192
991 PRE CONST
STATE OF MINNESOTA 993 EXISTING CENTERLINE
T FO
R
191
994
NO V
82.04 AC E
190
993
992 20
3
99
R
189
991
100 T.
188
0
184
185
992 PUBLIC WATER BASIN 0 100 200
186
W 999
ET N
183
187
993
E ID # 12009400
182
STR
990
998
0
TH 990 991 SCALE IN FEET
181
178
60
177
179
176
180
40 /
175
TH I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
174
1
997
173
172
171
170
992
992
169
995
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
168
997 994
167
995
998 997
166
W
5
EN
991
16 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
AV

STATE OF MINNESOTA 996 994
4
16
TH

75.94 AC
99
163
130
990
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
2
16
161
160
991
159
158
992
999965 DATE LIC. NO.
157
993
994
156
1020 1020 WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT
STATE OF MINNESOTA PMBB FARM PARTNERSHIP
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NO CONSTRUCTION NOTE:
1000 XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
980 980
990.27
990.25
990.23
990.21
990.19
990.17
990.15
990.13
990.11
990.09
990.07
990.05
990.03
990.01
989.99
989.97
989.95
989.93
989.91
989.89
989.87
989.85
989.83
989.81
989.79
990.3
990.5
990.3
990.1
990.4
990.6
991.1
991.2
991.6
991.3
991.0
990.9
990.8
990.7
990.4
991.0
991.2
990.8
991.3
991.7
991.8
991.7
991.7
991.7
991.7
970 180+00 179+00 178+00 177+00 176+00 175+00 174+00 173+00 172+00 171+00 170+00 169+00 168+00 167+00 166+00 165+00 164+00 163+00 162+00 161+00 160+00 159+00 158+00 157+00 156+00 970
NOTE:
VIRGENE & LINDA 60TH XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
DALE T JOHNSON STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAWN BY JAG
MOLDEN ST NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DESIGNED BY MAO
1010 1010 1010 REVIEWED BY CJB

60TH STREET NW
1000 1000
EXISTING 6'X12' 1000 TITLE
BOX CULVERT
ARMOR CULVERT I(N)=989.74 EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
I(S)=989.16 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
23 CY RIPRAP
MAINLINE PLAN &
990 990
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
990.79
990.77
990.75
990.73
990.71
990.69
990.67
990.65
990.63
990.61
990.59
990.57
990.55
990.53
990.51
990.49
990.47
990.45
990.43
990.41
990.39
990.37
990.35
990.33
990.31
991.2
990.9
990.5
991.0
991.5
991.7
991.1
991.5
990.9
991.6
991.3
998.6
990.5
990.4
990.9
991.3
991.1
991.3
990.8
990.9
990.3
990.3
990.6
990.5
970 206+00 205+00 204+00 203+00 202+00 201+00 200+00 199+00 198+00 197+00 196+00 195+00 194+00 193+00 192+00 191+00 190+00 189+00 188+00 187+00 186+00 185+00 184+00 183+00 182+00 970
14 OF 25
264
996
99
5
EXISTING 263 70th STREET
48" CMP CULVERT ELEVATION = 999.30'
2
I(N)=994.41 26 ARMOR CULVERT 60 CY
I(S)=994.39 EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP.99
99 5
1
26 9
INSTALL 48" RCP
260 I(N)= 991.87
PHASE 7 ACCESS POINT I(S)= 991.86
994
259
995
258
996
998
257
99
996
W
JOHNSON, DALE T
N
256
E
996
AV
997
142.56 AC
255
WREMOVE EXISTING 48" 99 0 200 400
TH
N 5
254
T CMP CULVERT (WEST)
0
E
3
E
253
1
I(N)=993.46
TR SCALE IN FEET
252
996
S I(S)=993.65
251
TH
70 PROFILE SCALES
250
TURNAROUND AREA PHASE 6
9
PHASE 7
24
MAT LOCATIONS
248
MAT LOCATIONS 10
247
Y
INA RUCTION
R
246
L I M
PRE CONST
245
TURNAROUND AREA R
244
EXISTING CENTERLINE NO T FO V
243
E
242
PHASES 5&6 ACCESS POINT 20
241
R
240
998
T.
1
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP.
239
999945
997 0 100 200
SPOIL PLACEMENT PHASE #4
238
237
0
236
SCALE IN FEET
235
996
234
233
232
4 TURNAROUND PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
99
EXISTING 66"
231
5
AREA STATE OF MINNESOTA.
995 ARCH CMP CULVERT
SANDVEN, LEROY
230
PHASE 5 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
I(W)=990.87
229
996
160 AC MAT LOCATIONS
228
I(E)=990.69
227
226
993 995
997 ARMOR CULVERT 559 CY 43359
225
97 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO.
224
223
997
222
996
221
220
219
994 99
218
217
993 994 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
STATE OF995MINNESOTA 99
5
99
216
212
998
5
211
21
995 82.04 AC
214
215
210
3
99
209
3
208
207
206
DATE LIC. NO.
99
4
996 AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
PROJECT
130TH
LEROY SANDVEN STATE OF MINNESOTA DALE T JOHNSON
AVE NW
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NOTE:
1000 EXISTING 66" 130TH AVENUE NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
ARCH CMP CULVERT ARMOR CULVERT 55 CY
EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) I(W)=990.87 DITCH No. 9
I(E)=990.69
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
980 980
991.31
991.29
991.27
991.25
991.23
991.21
991.19
991.17
991.15
991.13
991.11
991.09
991.07
991.05
991.03
991.01
990.99
990.97
990.95
990.93
990.91
990.89
990.87
990.85
990.83
993.3
993.3
993.3
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.2
992.9
992.5
992.1
992.2
992.3
992.4
992.4
992.3
992.0
991.6
991.2
998.0
992.2
991.9
991.7
991.3
991.5
970 232+00 231+00 230+00 229+00 228+00 227+00 226+00 225+00 224+00 223+00 222+00 221+00 220+00 219+00 218+00 217+00 216+00 215+00 214+00 213+00 212+00 211+00 210+00 209+00 208+00 970
NOTE: CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES
LEROY SANDVEN XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG

XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000 TITLE

EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
MAINLINE PLAN &

990 990
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
991.83
991.81
991.79
991.77
991.75
991.73
991.71
991.69
991.67
991.65
991.63
991.61
991.59
991.57
991.55
991.53
991.51
991.49
991.47
991.45
991.43
991.41
991.39
991.37
991.35
993.8
993.3
993.3
993.6
993.6
993.6
993.6
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.3
993.3
993.3
970 258+00 257+00 256+00 255+00 254+00 253+00 252+00 251+00 250+00 249+00 248+00 247+00 246+00 245+00 244+00 243+00 242+00 241+00 240+00 239+00 238+00 237+00 236+00 235+00 234+00 970
15 OF 25
1
SPOIL PLACEMENT
JOHNSON, THOMAS W PHASE # 10
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
120 AC
1000
999 999 1000
998 998
999
TURNAROUND AREA 998
PHASE 10
PHASE 9 & 10
MAT LOCATION 997
ACCESS POINT 0 200 400
996
308
307
306
309
305
304
310
301
SCALE IN FEET
303
300
302
311
299
298
312
297
296
313
JOHNSON, BERGEN D & BESS Y

314
295
PROFILE SCALES
294
PHASE 9
293
TURNAROUND AREA 60 AC
292
PHASE 11 MAT LOCATION
291
MAT LOCATION
290
TURNAROUND AREA 10
289
Y
INA RUCTION
R
288
997 996
I M
287
L
PRE CONST
286
EXISTING CENTERLINE
285
R
996 T FO V
284
997 NO
283
JOHNSON, ERIK JOHNSON, CONNIE
E
282
PHASE 8 & 9 ACCESS POINT 20
R
281
80 AC 20 AC
SPOIL PLACEMENT
280
PHASE # 8 & 9 PHASE 8 T.
279
1000
MAT LOCATION 0 100 200
278
996
277
995 PHASE 8 ACCESS POINT
276
99 0
SCALE IN FEET
275
8
EXISTING
274
997 48" CMP CULVERT
273
272
998
271
270
I(N)=994.41 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
269
I(S)=994.39 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
268
996 995
267
EXISTING POWERSTATE OF MINNESOTA.
266
265
POLE, TYP.
14
997 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
264
996
99
0T
5
3
26
H
AV
998
EN
2
998 ARMOR CULVERT 26 CY 26 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
W
995
26
JOHNSON, PAUL STAGE 8 ACCESS POINT REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
REMOVE EXISTING 48"
58 AC 260
CMP CULVERT (WEST) STATE OF MINNESOTA.
994
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. I(N)=993.46
259
995
I(S)=993.65
258
5
257
99
996 INSTALL 48" RCP DATE LIC. NO.
I(N)= 991.87
256
996 I(S)= 991.86 AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
255
99
254
NOTE:BERGEN D
70TH
70TH PROJECT
CONNIE JOHNSON PAUL JOHNSON BERGEN D & BESS JOHNSON XXX.X -&EXISTING
BESS DITCH GRADE
STST
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH NW
NW
GRADE
1010 JOHNSON 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NOTE: EXISTING 70TH
XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE 48" CMP CULVERT STREET NW
1000 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE I(N)=994.41
1000 JOINT COUNTY
I(S)=994.39
ARMOR CULVERT 26 CY DITCH No. 9
990 REMOVE EXISTING 990 REVISION SCHEDULE
POINT OF GRADE CHANGE 48" CMP CULVERT DATE DESCRIPTION BY
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. I(N)=993.46
I(S)=993.65
980
INSTALL 42LF 48" RCP 980
WEST I(N)= 991.87
WEST I(S)= 991.86
992.61
992.57
992.53
992.49
992.45
992.41
992.37
992.33
992.29
992.25
992.21
992.17
992.13
992.09
992.07
992.05
992.03
992.01
991.99
991.97
991.95
991.93
991.91
991.89
991.87
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.0
993.7
993.9
994.2
994.6
994.6
994.5
994.3
994.0
993.7
993.2
970 284+00 283+00 282+00 281+00 280+00 279+00 278+00 277+00 276+00 275+00 274+00 273+00 272+00 271+00 270+00 269+00 268+00 267+00 266+00 265+00 264+00 263+00 262+00 261+00 260+00 970
THOMAS W JOHNSON ERIK JOHNSON CONNIE JOHNSON DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) 1000 TITLE

MAINLINE PLAN &

990 990
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
993.65
993.61
993.57
993.53
993.49
993.45
993.41
993.37
993.33
993.29
993.25
993.21
993.17
993.13
993.09
993.05
993.01
992.97
992.93
992.89
992.85
992.81
992.77
992.73
992.69
994.2
994.4
994.6
994.0
994.1
993.9
994.0
994.1
993.7
994.3
994.5
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
970 310+00 309+00 308+00 307+00 306+00 305+00 304+00 303+00 302+00 301+00 300+00 299+00 298+00 297+00 296+00 295+00 294+00 293+00 292+00 291+00 290+00 289+00 288+00 287+00 286+00 970
16 OF 25
140TH AVE N
1002
1001
OYEN, MARTIN C
EXISTING BRANCH 1 CENTERLINE 1000
2 227.09 AC
1000
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL
99
6
999
243.92 AC
99
998
7
REMOVE EXISTING 36"
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CMP CULVERT
CMP CULVERT I(N)=997.05
I(N)=997.36 EXISTING TREE, TYP.
I(S)=996.87 PHASE 13
I(S)=996.33 0 200 400
1000
80TH STREET NW
331
330
334
333
332
337
336
335
338
339
329
361
341
351
340
328
360
362
359
358
357
363
356
355
354
364
353
352
366
365
350
349
348
342
368
367
347
346
343
345
344
SCALE IN FEET
7 PHASE 12 MAT LOCATION
998 32
PROPOSED 36" RCP SPOIL PLACEMENT PHASES
999 I(N)=996.80
PROPOSED 36" RCP
I(N)=996.30 32
6
99
8 999
11,12, & 13 PROFILE SCALES
I(S)=996.78 I(S)=996.28 5
10
00
32 997 10
12
1000 100 Y
TURNAROUND AREA
10
1
EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP. L I M INA RUCTION
R
4 02
PRE CONST
32
JOHNSON, THOMAS W 3 NO T FO
R
V
160 AC 32 997 E
20
11
EXISTING CENTERLINE R
322
10 T.
1
00
32
999
10
01 0 100 200
998
THOMAS W 5
0
140TH
32
& DOROTHY THOMAS W JOHNSON JOHNSON, THOMAS W SCALE IN FEET
0
9
AVE NW
31
1010 JOHNSON 1010
120 AC
8
998
REMOVE & REPLACE WITH 42 LF OF 36" RCP CULVERTREPORT
(4) WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
31
EXISTING 36" CMP CULVERT (4) (2) I(W)=994.89, I(E)=994.88 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
17
140TH AVENUE NW I(W)=996.02, I(E)=996.16 JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY ARMOR CULVERT 1503 CY (2) I(W)=993.89, I(E)=993.88 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I(W)=995.70, I(E)=995.72
160 AC 100 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
316
0
1000 I(W)=995.76, I(E)=995.50 1000 PHASE 11
5
31
I(W)=996.62, I(E)=996.26 99
MAT LOCATION 9
ARMOR CULVERT 150 CY
314
REMOVE & REPLACE WITH 99
8
99
36" RCP CULVERT (4) DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
313
REMOVE & REPLACE WITH 101000
(1) I(W)=994.11, I(E)=993.88 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
312
990 990 00 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
36" RCP CULVERT (4) (1) I(W)=994.15, I(E)=993.88 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
311
997
(1) I(W)=994.11, I(E)=993.88 (2) I(W)=993.90, I(E)=993.88 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
310
(1) I(W)=994.15, I(E)=993.88
(2) I(W)=993.90, I(E)=993.88
309
308
980 980
7
30 DATE LIC. NO.
993.93
993.89
993.85
993.81
993.77
993.73
994.7
994.6
994.5
994.5
994.4
994.3
6
30 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
317+00 316+00 315+00 314+00 313+00 312+00 5WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
970 970 30
PROJECT
THOMAS W & DOROTHY JOHNSON
1010 1010
EXISTING 36" EXISTING 36"
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
CMP CULVERT CMP CULVERT NOTE:
(80TH STREET) (80TH STREET) XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
1000 I(N)=997.36 I(N)=997.05 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) EXISTING CENTERLINE
GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
I(S)=996.33 I(S)=996.87
DITCH No. 9
POINT OF GRADE CHANGE CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
990
POINT OF GRADE CHANGE 990 REVISION SCHEDULE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980 980
996.41
996.37
996.33
996.29
996.25
996.21
996.15
996.02
995.89
995.76
995.63
995.50
995.37
995.24
995.11
994.98
994.85
994.72
994.59
994.46
994.33
994.20
994.09
994.05
994.01
996.3
996.4
996.4
996.5
996.5
996.5
996.4
996.4
996.3
996.2
996.2
996.1
996.1
996.0
996.0
995.9
995.9
995.8
995.7
995.6
995.5
995.5
995.4
995.3
994.8
970 343+00 342+00 341+00 340+00 339+00 338+00 337+00 336+00 335+00 334+00 333+00 332+00 331+00 330+00 329+00 328+00 327+00 326+00 325+00 324+00 323+00 322+00 321+00 320+00 319+00 970
NOTE: THOMAS W CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES
THOMAS W JOHNSON XXX.X -& DOROTHY

EXISTING DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG
1010 JOHNSON 1010 REVIEWED BY CJB
EXISTING CENTERLINE CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)

1000 1000 TITLE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. MAINLINE PLAN &

990 990
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
997.37
997.33
997.29
997.25
997.21
997.17
997.13
997.09
997.05
997.01
996.97
996.93
996.89
996.85
996.81
996.77
996.73
996.69
996.65
996.61
996.57
996.53
996.49
998.4
998.4
998.4
998.3
998.3
998.2
998.2
998.1
998.1
998.1
998.0
998.0
997.9
997.9
997.8
997.8
997.8
997.7
997.7
997.7
997.7
997.7
997.8
970 369+00 368+00 367+00 366+00 365+00 364+00 363+00 362+00 361+00 360+00 359+00 358+00 357+00 356+00 355+00 354+00 353+00 352+00 351+00 350+00 349+00 348+00 347+00 346+00 345+00 970
17 OF 25
0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
32
10 04
03
31
1002
10 01
00
30
29
PROFILE SCALES
28
10
27 M INARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR V
O T FOR E
N 20
R
26 T.
0 100 200
0
25 SCALE IN FEET

KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
24
243.92 AC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
23
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
22
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
21
INSTALL 36" RCP CULVERT 20
(N)=996.80, I(S)=996.78 DATE LIC. NO.

04
11000023
1
999
10
ARMOR WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
1
1000
5
19
100
CULVERTS
1002
2
997
00
0
10
48 CY RIPRAP 1002 10 PROJECT

04
10
3
03
18
REMOVE EXISTING 36"
4
CMP CULVERT (2)

I(N)=997.36, I(S)=996.33 PLACE DITCH SPOILS ON WEST
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
100
17
5
1
I(N)=997.05, I(S)=996.87 SIDE OF BRANCH 1
6
INSTALL 36" RCP CULVERT JOINT COUNTY
16
(N)=996.30, I(S)=996.28
1000 EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP.
7
DITCH No. 9
15
1001
BWSR RIM EASEMENT, TYP.

8
10
04 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
1002
14
EXISTING MAINLINE REVISION SCHEDULE
9
CENTERLINE 100 13 DATE DESCRIPTION BY

3 EXISTING BRANCH 1 MAINLINE
OYEN, MARTIN C
10
1
100 100
100 1
997
227.09 AC
12
1 1909098
11
2
100 100
2

80TH (W) LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES BR.1 & 2
JAG
NW (E) MARTIN C OYEN DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY MAO
REMOVE EXISTING 36" ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
CMP CULVERT (2) NOTE: CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
I(N)=997.36, I(S)=996.33 XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
I(N)=997.05, I(S)=996.87 XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
1010 1010 TITLE
ARMOR CULVERTS 48 CY RIPRAP
INSTALL 36" RCP CULVERT EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
(N)=996.80, I(S)=996.78 LEGAL GRADE, TYP. BRANCH 1 PLAN &
1000 (N)=996.30, I(S)=996.28 1000
PROFILE
990 990
SHEET
996.33
996.42
996.49
996.54
996.59
996.64
996.69
996.74
996.79
996.84
996.89
996.94
996.99
997.04
997.09
997.14
997.19
997.24
997.29
997.34
997.39
997.44
997.49
997.54
997.59
999.0
995.9
996.7
996.4
996.1
996.1
996.5
996.9
997.1
997.3
997.4
996.8
996.8
997.1
997.2
997.1
996.8
996.6
996.4
996.4
997.1
997.2
997.0
997.4
997.3
980 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 980
18 OF 25
53 0
53+00.0
42+00.00
430.00
52+00.00
440.00
450.00
460.00
510.00
47+4700.00
500.00
48+4800.00
490.00
43+0
42
1005
44+0
52
45+0
46+0
51+0
4 1+ 4 1
50+0
1005
49+0
04 1003
1002
00.
10 1002
MEAGHER, CAROL & PATRICK
00
40+ 40
1006 1007 END BRANCH 1 CONSTRUCTION
73.95 AC
00.
00
39+ 3
009.
00
0 100 200
38+
3080.00 EXISTING BRANCH 1 MAINLINE SCALE IN FEET
37+
3070.00
PROFILE SCALES
10
M INARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR V
00
36+0306. NO T FOR E
20
R
T.
1003
999
0 100 200
35
1004
0
SCALE IN FEET
100
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
33 OYEN, MARTIN C
100
227.09 AC
1004 5
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

1003
100201
00
1100003
4

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
PLACE ALL SPOILS ON WEST SIDE

31
DATE LIC. NO.
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
243.92 AC AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
30
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. BWSR RIM EASEMENT, TYP. (N) LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON PROJECT
(S) MARTIN C OYEN

1020 1020
29 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
1010 1010 JOINT COUNTY

28 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
DITCH No. 9
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
27

DATE DESCRIPTION BY
26
25
990 990
998.84
998.89
998.94
998.99
999.04
1001.8
1002.0
1002.3
1002.4
1002.0
24
980 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 980

23 PROJECT NO. 15-18675
(W) LESLIE & RUDELL
(W) CAROL & PATRICK MEAGHER (N) LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES BR.1 & 2
KITTLESON LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON DRAWN BY JAG
(E) MARTIN C OYEN (S) MARTIN C OYEN
1020 (E) MARTIN C OYEN 1020
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
NOTE: CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
1010 XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1010 TITLE
BRANCH 1 PLAN &
1000 1000
PROFILE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
990 990
SHEET
997.69
997.74
997.79
997.84
997.89
997.94
997.99
998.04
998.09
998.14
998.19
998.24
998.29
998.34
998.39
998.44
998.49
998.54
998.59
998.64
998.69
998.74
998.79
998.84
998.89
1000.5
1001.1
1001.2
1001.3
1001.5
1001.8
1001.8
1001.7
1001.8
1002.0
997.4
997.6
997.8
997.8
997.7
997.9
998.0
998.1
998.3
998.4
998.5
999.1
999.8
999.7
999.5
980 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 980
19 OF 25
---- ---- 20
991
991
M I NARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
OR
N OT F
990
991
KEY IN HOG SLATS
21'
PLACE 34 CY CLASS III RIPRAP ON MNDOT 21'
TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 2+00
1+50
1+00
991
0+50 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
0+00 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
KEY IN HOG SLATS
3 - 4'x10' HOG SLATS
TOP ELEVATION: 991.70 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
PROPOSED CONTOUR, TYP. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
991
990
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
991
992
992
DATE LIC. NO.

991
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
990
990
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY
MINNESOTA
992
991
991 REVISION SCHEDULE
0 10 20 DATE DESCRIPTION BY
SCALE IN FEET
993
HEAD CUT 1 XS
TOP 4'x10' HOG SLATS
995 CLASS III RIPRAP ELEVATION=991.70 995
FILE NAME 18675-PROF BR 1 & 2-DNR STRUCT
DRAWN BY JAG
KEY IN HOG SLATS KEY IN HOG SLATS DESIGNED BY MAO
990 1.5" CRUSHED ROCK 990 REVIEWED BY CJB
EXISTING SURFACE
(INCIDENTAL TO HOG ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
12/21/2018
SLAT PLACEMENT) COMPACTED CLAY CLIENT PROJECT NO.-
LEGAL DITCH
GEOMETRY
985 985 TITLE
LEGAL DITCH
ELEVATION=989.67
980 980 DNR BASIN PROFILE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. PROPOSED GRADE, TYP.

975 975
SHEET
991.70
20
989.7
970 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30 1+40 1+50 1+60 1+70 1+80 1+90 2+00 2+10 2+20 970 OF 25
20 DNR BASIN PROFILE
---- ---- 21
993
PLACE 34 CY CLASS III RIPRAP ON MNDOT EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP.

TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
992
991
M I N ARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
R
991
NO T FO
KEY IN HOG SLATS
991 992
992
990
991
990
990
990 991
3 - 4'x10' HOG SLATS 991 991 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
TOP ELEVATION: 991.70
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
992
991 KEY IN HOG SLATS
991
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1
99
DATE LIC. NO.
992
992
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
MINNESOTA
REVISION SCHEDULE
SCALE IN FEET
1000 HEAD CUT 1 PROF 1000

ELEVATION=991.70
995 1.5" CRUSHED ROCK PROPOSED GRADING TOP OF WATERWAY 995
(INCIDENTAL TO HOG FOR HOG SLAT PROJECT NO. 15-18675
SLAT PLACEMENT) STRUCURE FILE NAME 18675-PROF BR 1 & 2-DNR STRUCT
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
12/21/2018
EXISTING SURFACE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.-
LEGAL DITCH
985 ELEVATION=989.67 COMPACTED CLAY 985 TITLE

975 975
SHEET
990.36
991.70
991.30
990.30
21
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
970 2+30 2+20 2+10 2+00 1+90 1+80 1+70 1+60 1+50 1+40 1+30 1+20 1+10 1+00 0+90 0+80 0+70 0+60 0+50 0+40 0+30 0+20 0+10 970 21 DNR BASIN PROFILE
OF 25
70TH STREET NW
0 10 20
SCALE IN FEET
996
997
997
995
998
998
OPEN CUT AND RESTORE GRAVEL SURFACE
M INARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
996
999
994
ARMOR EXISTING CULVERT WITH 7 CY MnDOT CLASS III FOR
999
NO T
EXISTING JCD No. 9 RIPRAP ON TYPE IV
CENTERLINE INSTALL 50 LF PERIMETER CONTROL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ON EXISTING CULVERT
995 994
INSTALL 7 CY MnDOT CLASS III
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV
999
999
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
998
998
997
997
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
INSTALL 48-INCH RCP CULVERT INSTALL 19 CY MnDOT CLASS III DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
I(N) = 991.92 RIPRAP ON TYPE IV I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
994
I(S) = 991.87 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
996 995 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REMOVE EXISTING 48" CMP
997
SEED 30 SY WITH MNDOT SANDVEN, LEROY
998
SEED 30 SY WITH MNDOT
JOHNSON, BERGEN D & BESS SEED MIXTURE 25-142 AND
999
SEED MIXTURE 25-142 AND 160 AC
998
60 AC
997
996
MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION
999
DATE LIC. NO.
CONTROL BLANKET
994
CONTROL BLANKET
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1010 1010
℄
XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP.
OPEN CUT AND RESTORE (MATCH EXISTING)
1005 AGGREGATE ROADWAY 1005
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL CAD FILE NAME 18675 CULVERT PROFILES
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL DRAWN BY JAG
PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. 1000
REMOVE EXISTING REVIEWED BY CJB
48" RCP INSTALL 19 CY MnDOT CLASS III

INSTALL 7 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON TYPE IV CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

995 EXISTING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 995 TITLE
DITCH BOTTOM INSTALL 52 LF 48-INCH RCP
CULVERT @ 0.10% (TIE ALL
991.92 991.91 SECTIONS) 991.88 991.87
70TH STREET
990 990
CULVERT
2' IMPERVIOUS
CLAY PLUG, TYP.
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL, TYP
985 (12" MIN) 985
SHEET
991.87
991.87
991.87
991.87
991.86
991.86
991.86
991.86
991.86
991.85
993.2
993.2
993.1
997.7
999.1
999.2
998.4
994.2
993.4
993.4
980 260+00 259+90 259+80 259+70 259+60 259+50 259+40 259+30 259+20 259+10 980
22 OF 25
1000
999
140TH AVE NW
999
998
998
995
997
0 10 20
996
INSTALL 37 LF PERIMETER CONTROL
EXISTING JCD No. 9 0+00 SCALE IN FEET

CENTERLINE
INSTALL 36-INCH RCP CULVERT M INARY CTION

A LI U
I(W) = 994.11 PRE CONSTR
0+00 I(E) = 993.88 O T FOR
N
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
996 0+50
B INSTALL 92 CY MnDOT CLASS III

RIPRAP ON TYPE IV
997
INSTALL 36-INCH RCP CULVERT 0+50 A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

I(W) = 994.11 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
I(E) = 993.88 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CMP STATE OF MINNESOTA.
JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY 0+ JOHNSON, THOMAS W CHARLES J. BRANDEL
C B 93
160 AC 120 AC
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
INSTALL 58 CY MnDOT CLASS III 997
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV C SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC D STATE OF MINNESOTA.
999
996
998
998
DATE LIC. NO.
1000
1000
D
999
996
SEED 32 SY WITH MNDOT PROJECT

SEED MIXTURE 25-142 AND
999
MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION SEED 27 SY WITH MNDOT
CONTROL BLANKET
998
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
997
998
MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION
999
996
CONTROL BLANKET
1000
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
A-A B-B
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1010 1010 1010 1010
XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND℄ ℄

XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP. XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP.
1005 OPEN CUT AND RESTORE (MATCH EXISTING) 1005 1005 (MATCH EXISTING) 1005
OPEN CUT AND RESTORE PROJECT NO. 15-18675
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL AGGREGATE ROADWAY PLACE 6" TOP SOIL AGGREGATE ROADWAY
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL PLACE 6" TOP SOIL CAD FILE NAME 18675 CULVERT PROFILES
PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING DRAWN BY JAG
PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. PROPOSED GROUND, TYP.
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CMP DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III 1000 1000 1000 CJB
36" CMP PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III REVIEWED BY
INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON TYPE IV RIPRAP ON TYPE IV ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EXISTING INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
DITCH BOTTOM RIPRAP ON TYPE IV EXISTING
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALL 46 LF 36-INCH RCP CULVERT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALL 50 LF 36-INCH RCP CULVERT
995 994.11@ 0.78% (TIE 995 995 DITCH BOTTOM 995 TITLE
993.88
ALL SECTIONS) 994.21 994.15@ 0.78% (TIE ALL SECTIONS) 993.88 993.82
994.18 993.82
140TH AVENUE
990 2' IMPERVIOUS 990 990 2' IMPERVIOUS 990
CLAY PLUG, TYP.
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL CLAY PLUG, TYP. CULVERT
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL, TYP GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL, TYP
(12" MIN) (12" MIN)
985 985 985 985

SHEET
993.90
993.89
993.89
993.89
993.88
993.88
993.87
993.87
993.87
1000.2
993.90
993.89
993.89
993.88
993.88
993.88
993.87
993.87
993.86
1000.3
1000.2
995.3
995.6
996.0
999.9
998.6
995.8
995.9
996.0
995.4
995.3
998.2
998.1
997.2
995.3
994.6
980 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 980 980 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 980
23 OF 25
1000
999
140TH AVE NW
999
998
998
995
997
0 10 20
996
INSTALL 37 LF PERIMETER CONTROL
EXISTING JCD No. 9 SCALE IN FEET

CENTERLINE
M INARY CTION
A LI U
PRE CONSTR
O T FOR
N
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
996
0+0
0 B INSTALL 92 CY MnDOT CLASS III
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV
997
INSTALL 58 CY MnDOT CLASS III A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

RIPRAP ON TYPE IV I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
0+0 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY JOHNSON, THOMAS W CHARLES J. BRANDEL
C B
160 AC 0+50
120 AC
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
INSTALL 36-INCH RCP CULVERT 997
I(W) = 993.90 C SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I(E) = 993.88
D STATE OF MINNESOTA.
0+50
999
996
998
1+0
998
0 DATE LIC. NO.
1000
INSTALL 36-INCH RCP CULVERT
1000
D
999
I(W) = 993.90 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
I(E) = 993.88 0+93 WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
995
996

PROJECT
999
998
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
997
998
999
CONTROL BLANKET 996
1000
MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION JOINT COUNTY
CONTROL BLANKET
DITCH No. 9
C-C D-D
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1010 1010 1010 1010
℄
XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND ℄
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP. AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP.
1005 (MATCH EXISTING) 1005 1005 (MATCH EXISTING) 1005
OPEN CUT AND RESTORE OPEN CUT AND RESTORE PROJECT NO. 15-18675
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL AGGREGATE ROADWAY PLACE 6" TOP SOIL PLACE 6" TOP SOIL AGGREGATE ROADWAY CAD FILE NAME 18675 CULVERT PROFILES
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL DRAWN BY JAG
REMOVE EXISTING PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING
36" CMP 36" CMP PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000 1000 1000 REVIEWED BY CJB
PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III PROPOSED GROUND, TYP.
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III
INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RIPRAP ON TYPE IV CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV RIPRAP ON TYPE IV
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALL 52 LF 36-INCH RCP CULVERT INSTALL 46 LF 36-INCH RCP CULVERT
995 995 995 993.88
995 TITLE
993.90 993.90 @ 0.05% (TIE ALL SECTIONS) 993.88 993.88 993.90 @ 0.05% (TIE ALL SECTIONS
993.90 ) 993.88
EXISTING
DITCH BOTTOM
EXISTING
DITCH BOTTOM
140TH AVENUE
990 2' IMPERVIOUS 990 990 2' IMPERVIOUS 990
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL CLAY PLUG, TYP.
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL CLAY PLUG, TYP. GRANULAR FOUNDATION CULVERT
GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL, TYP
MATERIAL, TYP (12" MIN)
(12" MIN)
985 985 985 985
SHEET
993.91
993.90
993.90
993.90
993.89
993.89
993.88
993.88
993.88
993.91
993.90
993.90
993.90
993.89
993.89
993.88
993.88
993.88
1000.6
1000.3
995.3
995.6
995.8
998.8
998.1
997.5
996.6
995.5
995.6
995.8
996.7
999.5
998.5
995.9
996.2
994.9
980 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 980 980 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 980
24 OF 25
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDELL LIFE EST
243.92 AC
EXISTING JCD No. 9

MAINLINE CENTERLINE
0 10 20
80TH STREET
EXISTING JCD No. 9 SCALE IN FEET
INSTALL 53 LF PERIMETER CONTROL BRANCH 2 CENTERLINE

M INARY CTION
LI U
INSTALL 36-INCH RCP CULVERT PRE CONSTR
I(S) = 996.78
O T FOR
I(N) = 996.80 N
85
0+
A
JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY
160 AC 0+00 0+50
INSTALL 29 CY MnDOT CLASS III I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
A RIPRAP ON TYPE IV SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
INSTALL 19 CY MnDOT CLASS III CHARLES J. BRANDEL
85
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV
0+
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC B
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
0+00 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
0+50 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
OYEN, MARTIN C ETAL DATE LIC. NO.

INSTALL 36-INCH RCP CULVERT WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
I(S) = 996.78
I(N) = 996.80 SEED 38 SY WITH MNDOT PROJECT
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CMP CONTROL BLANKET
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
CONTROL BLANKET
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
A-A B-B
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1010 1010 1010 1010

OPEN CUT AND RESTORE OPEN CUT AND RESTORE
XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND℄ AGGREGATE ROADWAY XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND℄ AGGREGATE ROADWAY
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP. AGGREGATE SECTION, TYP.
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL (MATCH EXISTING) PLACE 6" TOP SOIL (MATCH EXISTING) PROJECT NO. 15-18675
1005 1005 1005 1005
PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. PLACE 6" TOP SOIL PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. PLACE 6" TOP SOIL CAD FILE NAME 18675 CULVERT PROFILES
DRAWN BY JAG
INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III PROPOSED GROUND, TYP. INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III PROPOSED GROUND, TYP.
DESIGNED BY MAO
RIPRAP ON TYPE IV INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON TYPE IV INSTALL MnDOT CLASS III
REVIEWED BY CJB
1000 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RIPRAP ON TYPE IV 1000 1000 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RIPRAP ON TYPE IV 1000 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
INSTALL 46 LF 36-INCH RCP CULVERT INSTALL 46 LF 36-INCH RCP CULVERT CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
996.78 @ 0.05% (TIE ALL SECTIONS) 996.78 @ 0.05% (TIE ALL SECTIONS)
996.80 996.80
TITLE
995 995 995 995
996.78 996.80 996.78 996.80
2' IMPERVIOUS 2' IMPERVIOUS
CLAY PLUG, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING CLAY PLUG, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING
48" RCP
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL
48" RCP
PLACE 6" TOP SOIL
80TH STREET
GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL, TYP GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL, TYP
990 (12" MIN) EXISTING 990 990 (12" MIN) EXISTING 990 CULVERT
DITCH BOTTOM DITCH BOTTOM
985 985 985 985

SHEET
996.78
996.79
996.79
996.79
996.80
996.78
996.79
996.79
996.79
996.80
1000.8
1000.6
1000.8
1000.6
995.9
996.9
999.9
996.1
995.8
995.8
995.9
996.9
999.9
996.1
995.8
995.8
980 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 980 980 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 980
25 OF 25
Appendix B: Maps
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix B

23 24
25 30 29 28 27 59
£
¤ 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25
Moyer Marysland
Shible 60
"
)
£
¤59
59
£
¤
36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36
59
5
6
11
59
£
¤
£
¤ 6
17
5
5
6 36
59
£
¤
59
£
¤ 6
5 10
2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 61
"
) 6 5 4 3 2
59
£
¤
59
£
¤
£
¤ 59
6
8
5
11 59
£ 12 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11
¤ 10 11 12
Swift
County
14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14
5
6 9
Appleton
5
6
6
West Bank
Edison
23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23
26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 65
"
) 28 27 26 62"
)
52
"
)
JCD 9 Branch 1 5
6 2
Open Ditch
35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35
2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 11 "
)
Kragero
11 12 7 8 9 10 5
6 10
11 12 7 8 9 10 11
34
"
)
14
13 MNDNR PWI
18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14
Basin 12009400
14 13 Kragero 6
21
5
ß40
ª
M I NN E SO T A
24 5
630
BIg Bend
23
24
19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 JCD
21 9 Mainline 22
Open Ditch23
Chippewa
30
County
26 25 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26
30
32
33
6
5 31 12
"
) 12
"
)
JCD 9 Watershed
35 36 73
"
) 31 34 Area=17,209
35 Acres 36 31 32 33 34 35
32 7
ß
ª
M I NN E SO T A
2
6
533 5
6 32
1 6 5 3 4 3
2 1 6 5 Steve ns
County
Po pe 2
Swift
County
4 County
Swift
County
5
6
Big Stone
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Repair Report Maps\18675 JCD 9 Watershed Map.mxd
26
Co unty
County
Swift
33
"
) Swift
10
County
7
11 12 7 8 11
9 8 9 10 11
Lac Qui Parle
12
Tunsberg Swift
Co unty
Chippewa
10
Ch
County
C i County
La
11
pp nty Co u
cQ
ew
6
ou ar le
31
5
ui
a
P
Chippewa
5
6
n ty
14 9 County
14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14
13
Lac Qui
23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 19 20 21
Parle County
Yellow M edicine 22 23
µ
County
Legend
Watershed Map JCD 9 Watershed
PN: 15-18675
Source:
Joint County Ditch No 9 JCD 9 Open Ditch Orthophotograph (MnGeo WMS, 2015)
Chippewa and Swift County, Public Waters Basins Tile/Ditch (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Parcels (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Minnesota Townships
0 1,500 3,000 6,000
Feet Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)
Wednesday, April 29, 2020 Sections 1 inch = 6,000 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
Counties (MN DNR, July 2013)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
27 26 25 30 29 28 27
110th St SW 110th St SW V
U241 110th St SW V
U238 110th St SW 98
V
U 5
62 110th St SW 110th St SW U
V 229 110th St SW
V
U 229
Swift
County
160th Ave SW
150th Ave SW
130th Ave SW
140th Ave SW
120th Ave SW
110th Ave SW
34 35 36 31 West Bank 32 33 34
JCD 9 Branch 1
Edison
Open Ditch
V
U241 98 65
5
6V 9 V
U238 V
U "
)
U 3
V U 3 Chip Swift St NW V 120th St SW
U345 345
V
U 120th St SW 345
V
U 120th St SW V Chip Swift St NW
220
U Chip Swift St NW Chip Swift St NW 220 V
U
110th Ave NW
103rd Ave NW
150th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
3 2 1 6 5 4 3
11
U
V
83rd St NW 11
U
V
110th Ave NW
BWSR RIM Easment, Typ.
V
U 74 75 V
U 77
V
U
80th St NW 80th St NW 10
V
U 10 80th St NW 80th St NW 10
U
V 80th St NW U
V9 80th St NW
V
U 10
U
V 9
V
U
120th Ave NW
150th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
10 11 12 7 8 9 10
77
U
V
5
6 10 74
V
U 75
V
U
110th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
U
V 13
V
U 70th St NW 13 70th St NW T-13
V
U
V
U 77
150th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
15 14 13 18 17 16 15
Kragero "
)34
74
U
V 75
V
U
60th St NW 60th St NW 40 60th St NW 60th St NW
ß 60th St NW 60th St NW 60th St NW 60th St NW
ª
M I NN E SO T A
BIg Bend
103r d A
ve N
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
W
22 23 24 19 20 21 19
U
V 22
50
St NW
Chippewa
th
MNDNR PWI
MN
Basin 12009400
County
77
U
V
74
U
V 75
TH
U
V
7
50th St NW 16
V
U 50th St NW 50th St NW 18
V
U 18
V
U 50th St NW 18
V
U 50th St NW
74
V
U 75
V
U 18
V
U
M
NT
H
7
JCD 9 Mainline Open Ditch

120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
27 26 25 30 29 28 27
77
V
U
V
U 74
5
6
31 40th St NW 40th St NW 40th St NW 12
"
) 40th St NW 40th St NW 40th St NW
M
75
NT
V
U
H
7
MN
130th Ave NW
6
TH
9
5
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
7
34 35 36 31 32 33 34
140th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
7
ß
ª
M I NN E SO T A
JCD 9 Watershed
Area=17,209 Acres 77
V
U
130th Ave NW
30th St NW V
U23 23
U
V 30th St NW 23
V
U 30th St NW 23 30th St NW
U
V 23
V
U
5
6 32 Steve ns
County
Swift
Po pe
County
81
County
Swift
County V
U
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Repair Report Maps\18675 JCD 9 Ditch System Map.mxd
100th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
95th Ave NW
Big Stone
M
Co unty
County
Swift
N
3
Swift
2 1 6 5 4 3
TH
County
7
Tunsberg
Swift
Co unty
Ch Chippewa
C i County
La
20th S
pp nty Co u
cQ
t
ew
ou ar le
N V
U81
ui
a
P
33 20th St NW 20th St NW V
U 76 20th St NW 27
V
U 20th St NW V
U NW
27 20th StChippewa
"
)
10
n ty
County
100th Ave NW
110th Ave SW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
95th Ave NW
11 12 7 8 9 10
MN
TH
Lac Qui
7
Parle County
Yellow M edicine
Legend
µ
County
Ditch System Map JCD 9 Watershed PN: 15-18675

Source:
Joint County Ditch No 9
JCD 9 Open Ditch
Orthophotograph (MnGeo WMS, 2015)
Public Waters Unnamed Stream Outlet
Chippewa and Swift County,
Tile/Ditch (XX County, 12/16/2016)
BWSR RIM Conservation Easements Parcels (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Minnesota
0 750 1,500 3,000
Public Waters Basins Feet Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)
Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
Wednesday, April 29, 2020 Townships 1 inch = 3,000 feet
Sections PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
27
110th St SW 26
110th St SW V
U241 25
110th St SW V
U238 Crossing #
30 SW
110th St Location V 5
98
U
Existing
Material62 Existing
Size (in)
29
Existing
110th St SW Existing
Upstream Downstream
Existing
Slope
28
110th StProposed
Proposed
Material
SW
Size (in)
Proposed Proposed
Slope U
V 110th St
229 Upstream
Proposed
SW
Downstream
27
Invert Invert (%) (%) Invert Invert
V
U 229
Swift
1 80th Street CMP 36 997.36 996.33 3.13% RCP 36 0.05% 996.80 996.78
1 80th Street CMP 36 997.05 996.33 2.19% RCP 36 0.05% 996.30 996.28
County
2 140th Ave CMP 36 996.02 996.16 -0.35% RCP 36 0.78% 994.11 993.88
160th Ave SW
150th Ave SW
130th Ave SW
140th Ave SW
120th Ave SW
110th Ave SW
2 140th Ave CMP 36 995.7 995.72 -0.05% RCP 36 0.78% 994.15 993.88
34 35 36 31 West Bank 32 33 34
2 140th Ave CMP 36 995.76 995.5 0.65% RCP 36 0.05% 993.90 993.88
2 140th Ave CMP 36 996.62 996.28 0.90% RCP 36 0.05% 993.90 993.88
3 70th Street CMP 48 993.46 993.65 -0.47% RCP 48 0.10% 991.87 991.86
Standard Open
3 70th Street CMP 48 994.41 994.39 0.05% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Ditch Cleaning Edison

V
U241 98 65
5
6V 9 V
U238 V
U "
)
U 3
U345 345
V
U 120th St SW 345
V
U 120th St SW V Chip Swift St NW
220
U Chip Swift St NW Chip Swift St NW 220 V
U
110th Ave NW
103rd Ave NW
150th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
3 2 1 6 5 4 11
U
V 3
Culvert Replacements With 83rd St NW 11
U
V
110th Ave NW
Floodplain Culverts
1 V
U 74 75 V
U 77
V
U
80th St NW
^ UV
_
80th St NW 10
2
10
V
U 80th St NW 10
U
V 80th St NW 10
U
V 80th St NW
V
U
U
V9 80th St NW
9
_
^
120th Ave NW
150th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
10 11 12 7 8 9 10
Cleaning Along 77
U
V
5
6 10 Roadways V
U74 75
V
U
110th Ave NW
3
100th Ave NW
U
V 13
V
U 70th St NW
_
^ 13
V
U 70th St NW
77
T-13
V
U
150th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
15 14 13 18 17 16 15
Kragero "
)34
74
U
V 75
V
U
60th St NW 60th St NW 40 60th St NW 60th St NW
ß 60th St NW 60th St NW 60th St NW 60th St NW
ª
M I NN E SO T A
BIg Bend
103r d A
Cleaning Through Head Cut Structure
ve N
Wetland Areas
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
W
22 23 24 19 20 21 19
U
V 22
!
.
50
St NW
Chippewa
th
MN
County
77
U
V
74
U
V 75
TH
U
V
7
50th St NW 16
V
U 50th St NW 50th St NW 18
V
U 18
V
U 50th St NW 18
V
U 50th St NW
74
V
U 75
V
U 18
V
U
M
No Construction
NT
H
7
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
27 26 25 30 29 28 27
77
V
U
V
U 74
5
"
) 40th St NW 40th St NW 40th St NW
M
75
NT
V
U
JCD 9 Watershed
H
7
Area=17,209 Acres
MN
130th Ave NW
6
TH
9
5
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
34 35 36 31 32 33 34
7
140th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
ß 7
ª
M I NN E SO T A
77
V
U
130th Ave NW
30th St NW 23
V
U 23
U
V 30th St NW 23
V
U
V 23
V
U
5
6 32 Steve ns
\\isgfile1\shared\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 G IS\Maps\Repair Report Maps\18675 JCD 9 Repair Overview Map.mxd
Po pe
County County
Swift
County
Swift 81
V
U
County
100th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
95th Ave NW
Big Stone
M
3
Co unty
4
County
2 6 5 3
Swift
1
N
Swift
TH
County
7
Tunsberg
Swift
Co unty
Ch Chippewa
C i County
La
20th S
pp nty Co u
cQ
t
ew
ou ar le
N V
U81
ui
a
P
33 20th St NW 20th St NW V
U 76 20th St NW 27
V
U 20th St NW V
U NW
27 20th StChippewa
10
"
)
n ty
County
100th Ave NW
110th Ave SW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
95th Ave NW
11 12 7 8 9 10
MN
TH
Lac Qui
7
Parle County
Yellow M edicine
Legend
µ
County
Repair Overview Map JCD 9 Watershed

PN: 15-18675
Joint County Ditch No 9 Public Waters Basins

Townships
_
^ Culvert Replacement Source:
Chippewa and Swift County, Clean & Remove Spoils Tile/Ditch (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Sections
Minnesota Clean & Remove Spoils W/Mats 0 750 1,500 3,000

No Construction Standard Cleaning Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
Thursday, July 23, 2020 1 inch = 3,000 feet
!
. Head Cut Structure PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
130th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
12 7 8
75
V
U
77
V
U
T-13
70th St NW 13 70th St NW
13
V
U U
V
Structure Elevation Meets Legal Grade
Y
X
120th Ave NW
77
V
U
130th Ave NW
17
13 18
Structure Elevation Meets Existing Grade
Y
X
75
U
V
Chippewa
Kragero BIg Bend
County
60th St NW
40 60th St NW
60th St NW
ß
ª
M I NN E SO T A
JCD 9 Watershed
120th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
24 19 20
Cleaning through DNR basin
Legend
!
.
JCD 9 Watershed
JCD 9 Open Ditch
Head Cut Structure
77
. Location
! U
V
Depth of Water
75
U
V
\\isgfile1\shared\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 G IS\Maps\Repair Report Maps\18675 JCD 9 DNR Structure Ditch Impacts.mxd
12 to 18-inches DNR Head Cut Location Steve ns Po pe
Elevation=991.70
County County
12-inches Swift
County
Swift
County
18 to 24-inches
Big Stone
Co unty
County
Swift
Swift
6 to 12-inches
County
Less than 6-inches 18
18
V
U 50th St NW U
V 50th St NW
Notes 75
77
V
U Swift
V
U Co unty
Chippewa
X
Y Structure Meets Ex Grade
Ch
C i County
La
pp nty Co u
cQ
ew
120th Ave NW
ou ar le
ui
130th Ave NW
a
P
Y
X Structure Meets Legal Grade Chippewa
25 30 29 County
n ty
Public Waters Basins

Townships
Sections
Lac Qui
Parle County
DNR Structure
Yellow M edicine
µ
County
PN: 15-18675
Impacts Map Source:
Joint County Ditch No 9


0 250 500 1,000
Minnesota 1 inch = 1,000 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
Friday, August 7, 2020 PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Appendix C: Cost Estimates
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix C

CHIPPEWA AND SWIFT COUNTY
November 3, 2020
OPEN DITCH REPAIR COST ESTIMATE

ITEM NO ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
101 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 113,230.00 $ 113,230
102 CLEAR AND GRUB TREE (OVER 6") EA 20 $ 450.00 $ 9,000
103 SLOUGH REPAIR LF 2000 $ 7.00 $ 14,000
CLEAN AND REMOVE SPOILS W/O MATS (3' WIDE DITCH
104 LF 4470 $ 12.00 $ 53,640
BOTTOM)
CLEAN AND REMOVE SPOILS W/ MATS (3' WIDE DITCH
105 LF 19715 $ 22.00 $ 433,730
BOTTOM THROUGH WETLAND AREAS)
106 SPOIL LEVELING AC 13 $ 2,700.00 $ 35,100
107 STANDARD DITCH CLEANING (3' WIDE DITCH BOTTOM) LF 5750 $ 2.10 $ 12,075
108 ARMOR TILE OUTLET (RIPRAP & GEOTEXTILE FABRIC) EA 50 $ 630.00 $ 31,500
110 INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL LF 140 $ 3.00 $ 420
111 INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATS LF 22755 $ 18.00 $ 409,590
112 TOPSOIL STRIPPING (12-INCHES)(EV) AC 6 $ 4,200.00 $ 25,200
SEED MIX 25-142 W/MNDOT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
113 SY 500 $ 3.50 $ 1,750
CATEGORY 3
TOTAL OPEN DITCH CONSTRUCTION COST $ 1,158,275
114 COMMON EXCAVATION AND SPOIL REMOVAL CY 45 $ 12.00 $ 540
115 BACKFILL (COMMON BORROW) CY 57 $ 18.00 $ 1,026
116 1/2" X 10' REBAR STAKE ANCHORS EA 60 $ 100.00 $ 6,000
117 4' X 10' HOG SLAT (WITH CRUSHED ROCK BASE EA 15 $ 475.00 $ 7,125
TOTAL HEAD CUT STRUCTURE COST $ 17,581
121 OPEN CUT & RESTORE GRAVEL ROAD OR DRIVEWAY EA 3 $ 1,698.50 $ 5,096
122 GRANULAR FOUNDATION CY 130 $ 18.00 $ 2,340
125 48-INCH RCP APRON EA 2 $ 2,100.00 $ 4,200
126 36-INCH RCP APRON EA 12 $ 1,250.00 $ 15,000
TOTAL ROAD AUTHORITY COST $ 88,866
20% Unforeseen $ 252,944
SUBTOTAL $ 1,517,666
TEMPORARY DAMAGES (MAT AREAS) AC 18.8 $ 100 $ 1,884
TEMPORARY DAMAGES (STRIPPING AND LEVELING AREAS) AC 13.0 $ 650 $ 8,450
WETLAND MITIGATION $ 7,000
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COSTS $ 30,354
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY $ 75,250
REPORTS, PERMIT APPLICATIONS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS $ 294,350
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND STAKING $ 106,237
TOTAL OPEN DITCH REPAIR COST ESTIMATE REPAIR COST $ 2,041,191
Appendix D: Reestablishment of Records
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix D

RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF RECORDS:
JOINT COUNTY DITCH NO 9:

CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
November 20, 2017
November, 2016
Project No. 12-1401
REPORT FOR: FROM:

Jon Clauson Chuck Brandel, PE
Auditor/Treasurer Principal + Senior Civil Engineer
629 North Eleventh Street ISG
Montevideo, MN 56265 115 E. Hickory Street, Suite 300
320.269.7447 Mankato, MN 56001
jclauson@chippewa.mn.us 507.387.6651
chuck.brandel@is-grp.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Signature Sheet ....................................................................................................................... 1
Re-Establishment of Records ..................................................................................................... 2
Watershed .............................................................................................................................. 3
History ................................................................................................................................... 3
Re-Establishment of Ditch Alignment .......................................................................................... 3
Re-Establishment of Ditch Grade ................................................................................................ 7
Re-Establishment of Legal Cross Sections ..................................................................................12
Recommendation ....................................................................................................................14
Summary ...............................................................................................................................15
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Watershed Maps
Appendix B: Original Design Documents
Appendix C: Alignment maps
Appendix D: Plan and Profiles
Appendix E: Ditch Cross Sections
Appendix F: Historical Aerial Photos
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Page 1

Signature Sheet
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE CALCULATIONS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
Charles J. Brandel, PE
Project Engineer
Reg. No. 43359
ISG
115 East Hickory Street, Suite 300
Mankato, Minnesota 56001
Re-Establishment of Records, Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9

Chippewa County, Minnesota
Engineer's Project Number: 15-18675

Dated this 20th day of November, 2017

Re-Establishment of Records
The re-establishment of records provision of MN Statute 103E.101 is a process in which if the Drainage
Authority finds that the original as-built records of a public drainage system are incomplete, procedures
can be executed to establish the originally designed system. This includes establishing the legal drainage
system which includes the ditch profile, alignment, cross section, hydraulic structure locations, right of
way, and any other pertinent information regarding the legal public drainage system.
Current records for the Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 (JCD 9) include only original design
profiles, ditch depth, ditch top width, ditch bottom width, and excavation volume. No documentation of
the originally constructed drainage system, or as-built is on record with the Chippewa and Swift Joint
County Drainage Authority.
In order for repairs to be completed on the JCD 9 public drainage system, the original records and legal
drainage system need to be re-established. This method includes determining the legal conditions of
the system by utilizing aerial photographs, topographic survey, soil borings, capacity designs, culvert
dimensions and elevations, and other information obtained to aide in the findings.
Since the JCD 9 public drainage system impacts a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
Public Water, the appointed engineer, representative of the DNR, and member of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District (SWCD) must jointly determine the legal repair depth affecting the Public
Water. During the soil boring field work, members of the DNR, SWCD, drainage staff and ISG were
present to observe the soil boring methodology. Furthermore, the findings included in this report have
been reviewed by the DNR and members of the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) prior to submission to
the Drainage Authority.
Watershed
Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 (JCD 9) is an approximately 17,200 acre watershed located
northeast of the City of Milan. This watershed lies in Big Bend and Kragero Townships in Chippewa
County and Edison Township in Swift County. JCD 9 is primarily drained by open ditches with the public
ditch spanning through Chippewa County where it begins in Section 2 of Kragero Township and outlets
in Section 33 of Big Bend Township into the Lines Creek tributary of the Chippewa River. The watershed
is mainly comprised of agricultural land cover with many wetland complexes stretching in the low areas
of the watershed along the drainage system. The topography throughout the watershed is gently rolling
with an elevation difference of 60 feet. JCD 9 watershed maps are included in Appendix A.
History
Joint County Ditch 9 was originally established in 1910 as a public drainage system with construction
commencing shortly after. The open ditch system consisted of the mainline and two public branches
located in Section 19 of Big Bend Township and Section 2 of Kragero Township. No as-built
documentation has been discovered of the originally constructed public drainage system. Original
designs of the JCD 9 drainage system are included in Appendix B.
Several private open ditches were constructed since the open ditch was established and outlet into the
JCD 9 public drainage system. In 1983, a petition for improvement was filed and preliminary engineering
was completed, however the improvement project did not move forward. In 2015, the first re-
determination of benefits was completed which allows for a larger repair of the system to be completed.
Re-Establishment of Ditch Alignment

The following sections describe the originally designed, as-built, and current/legal ditch alignment.
Several alignment reference maps are included in Appendix C showing all three alignments.

Originally Designed Alignment
The original designed alignment records indicate three open ditch segments of JCD 9 which include the
mainline, Branch 1, and Branch 2. The mainline open ditch design included 36,200 feet of open ditch
which began in the northwest quarter of Section 11 in Kragero Township along the 80th Street NW Right
of Way (ROW), 300 feet east from the Section 10 and 11 line and spanned in a southeast direction
where it ended 420 feet east of the center of Section 33 in Big Bend Township. The mainline alignment
passed through Sections 11, 12, and 13 of Kragero Township and Sections 18, 19, 20, 29, 28, and 33
of Big Bend Township.
Branch 1 was designed in Section 2 of Kragero Township and included 5,300 feet of open ditch beginning
at a point 1,800 feet south of the Chippewa and Swift County line and 1,600 feet west of the Section 1
and 2 line. The alignment traveled in a westerly direction for 1,200 feet where is changed to a southerly
direction until the junction at the mainline.
Branch 2 was designed in Section 19 of Big Bend Township and included 1,100 feet of open ditch
beginning 2,500 feet south of State Highway 40 and spanned northwest to the junction at the mainline
through what is now a portion of the DNR Public Water Basin ID 12009400.
Figure 1: Original Design Alignment of JCD 9 (Originally CD 13)
As-Built Alignment
The as-built alignment was primarily determined based on historical aerial photographs which showed
where the original ditch was excavated. The topographic survey and drone aerial were also utilized which
identified flow paths along the JCD 9 drainage system.
The as-built alignment followed the original design alignment from the beginning of the open ditch in
Section 11 of Kragero Township through Sections 12 and 13 of Kragero Township and Section 18 of Big
Bend Township up to State Highway 40. The original culvert crossing of State Highway 40 was installed
approximately 70 feet west of the designed culvert crossing. The ditch was then dug for approximately
750 feet to the west of the designed alignment until the alignment changed directions to the east. The
open ditch then followed the originally designed alignment through Section 19 of Big Bend Township
until the junction of 50th Street NW and 120th Avenue NW.

The as-built alignment crossed 120th Avenue NW approximately 250 feet north of 50 Street NW and
continued southeast through the Southwest quarter of Section 20 in Big Bend Township. The ditch then
crossed 50th Street NW approximately 300 feet east of 120th Avenue NW where it followed the designed
alignment through Section 29 and 33 of Big Bend Township where it terminated.
Branch 1 was constructed nearly the same as designed except for the upstream 1,220 feet at the
beginning. The start of the open ditch began 330 feet east of what was originally designed to connect
at a field line 1,300 feet west of the Section 1 and 2 line. The remaining portion of Branch 1 was
constructed as designed up to 80th Street NW where it connects to the mainline. Figure 2 shows the
1938 historical aerial photo of Branch 1. Additional historical aerial photos are included in Appendix F.
Branch 2 was constructed nearly the same as designed in Section 19 of Big Bend Township, however
did not stretch the entire length of the basin. The open ditch was dug 1,000 feet south from the mainline
junction spanning to the middle of the basin.
Figure 2: 1938 Historical Aerial Photo
Current Alignment
The current mainline alignment generally follows the as-built alignment with few alterations. From the
beginning of the open ditch in Section 11 of Kragero Township to State Highway 40 in Section 19 of Big
Bend Township, the mainline current alignment matches the as-built alignment. Between 1938 and
1955, the culvert crossing under State Highway 40 was re-located to the east by 70 feet. The open
channel was also shifted to the east for a stretch of 650 feet until it met with the as-built channel
alignment. Currently, at this point, a permanent impoundment just upstream of the DNR Basin ID
12009400 lies over the as-built and designed mainline alignment for 1,100 feet. After this point and

where Branch 2 connects to the mainline, the alignment then follows the as-built alignment through
Section 19 up to 120th Avenue NW.
The as-built alignment crossing 120th Avenue NW and 50th Street NW was re-aligned between 1938 and
1955 where one crossing under the 120th Avenue and 50th Street NW intersection was installed. The
open ditch was then re-routed along the west ROW of 120th Avenue and the south ROW of 50th Street
NW to connect the as-built alignment with the new culvert crossing location.
In the southeast quarter of Section 29, the mainline alignment has had significant alterations by
excavation. Between 1970 and 1990, several open water ponds were excavated along the mainline
alignment to 4 to 6 feet below the existing ground. Upstream of 110th Avenue NW approximately 3,500
feet has been significantly altered as the as-built ditch alignment no longer exists and is currently a
combination of open water ponds. The remainder of the current mainline alignment follows the as-built
alignment to the termination of the ditch in Section 33.
The Branch 1 alignment follows the as-built alignment except for the beginning 1,100 feet running in
the east-west direction. In the 1980s, the beginning of the as-built open ditch was re-aligned to run
east-west along the property line for ease of farming practice. The re-alignment consisted of
approximately 900 feet located 1,800 feet south of the Chippewa and Swift County line which is now
the existing alignment.
Portions of the as-built Branch 2 alignment no longer exists, as DNR Basin ID 12009400 has impounded
above the legal ditch. This is the case for approximately 550 feet at the beginning of Branch 2 (southern
portion) which now contains a permanent pool. The remaining 450 feet of Branch 2 up to the mainline
remains in the same location as the as-built alignment and includes a small channel overrun with cattails.
Based on the impoundment and its proximity to Branch 2, the legal alignment of Branch 2 includes the
open channel stretch of 450 feet from the mainline serving as an outlet to DNR Basin ID 12009400.
Based on the information described above, the legal ditch alignment for JCD 9 should follow the “current
alignment” as described above and as referenced in Appendix C.

Figure 3: Alignment Comparisons Example
Re-Establishment of Ditch Grade
The re-establishment of the JCD 9 legal grade utilized a topographic survey, soil borings, original design
documents, and culvert crossings. The findings of the legal ditch grades are described as follows. Full
plan and profiles of the legal ditch grade is included in Appendix D.
Topographic survey
A full topographic survey of the JCD 9 drainage system was performed along the legal alignment as well
as throughout the wetland complexes. The topographic survey was performed in 2016 and included the
following:
• Centerline of open channel
• Toes of open channel
• Top of channel or existing ground above channel
• Water’s edge of the cattails within the wetland complex
• Water level elevations
• Roadway cross sections
• Culvert inverts and dimensions
• Open water ponds or impoundments
• Miscellaneous points of interests

o Telephone poles
o Berms, dikes, or impoundment features
o Erosion areas or major flow restrictions
o Fence or field edge lines
o Beaver dams
All points taken in the topographic survey were used to generate an existing topographic surface of the
area. This surface was used as the baseline for analysis of the legal grade determination to spatially
reference the public drainage system and associated features on NAD 1983 Chippewa County
Coordinates.
Soil Borings
Soil borings were performed in the thalweg of the open ditch to assist in determining the legal ditch
grade and elevation throughout the watershed. The soil borings were to analyze the soil profile in the
bottom of the ditch, looking for textural changes between loose material (accumulated sediment) and a
firm bottom (original channel bottom/legal grade). The identified transition between the two was
spatially referenced and used in the analysis of legal ditch grade.
Tools utilized included a Dutch soil auger, tape measure, lath, Trimble GPS unit, and drone. The Dutch
auger was hand drilled into the soil profile and samples were removed from the unit (Figure 3). This
process was repeated until a firm soil sample was obtained by removing fine and loose material in the
top soil layer. The elevation of this sample was then shot with the Trimble GPS unit to spatially locate
the soil boring sample and the elevation of the identified originally excavated channel bottom. Soil
borings were taken at approximately every 1,000 to 1,500 feet throughout the entire open ditch and
soil boring depth ranged between 10 and 24 inches.
Figure 3: Soil Boring Sample of Original Ditch Bottom

Original Design Cut Depths
The original design profile and cut sheets showed the depth the existing ground was designed to be
excavated. The designed cuts ranged between 1 and 4 feet with an average cut of 2.75 feet across the
entire drainage system. Design cut depths were taken every 1,000 feet from the original design profile
for analysis of the legal ditch grade. The cut depths were plotted from the topographic survey top of
ditch bank or top of ground next to the ditch to spatially reference to the legal ditch grade (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Cut Depths on Original Design Profile
Culvert Crossings
No as-built documentation of the installed culverts were recovered for all road crossings. Culvert
crossings are generally installed near the legal ditch grade of a drainage system to continue grade
through the road crossing. Culvert crossings can be used to establish the legal ditch grade of the entire
profile. However, several of the township road crossings along JCD 9 experienced overtopping and
culvert washouts throughout the years. These culverts may not be as reliable to use for determining
legal ditch grade but can still be used for analysis and for determining appropriate culvert repair depth.
Several culverts along road crossings throughout JCD 9 have been repaired and replaced several times
over the years. These culverts were replaced after flooding and overtopping of the township roads.
Generally, the culverts were replaced with the same or next available size and placed near the same
elevation. No records were obtained for these repairs and over time, it is likely a great difference from
the as-built culverts condition occurred. Also at the time of the repairs, several of the crossings added
gravel, effectively raising the top of the roads. This may have also created discrepancies in the repairs
and maintenance of the culverts over time as the cross section of the roadway is no longer consistent
with the previous crossing layout.
Where culvert crossings along JCD 9 are either lower or higher that legal grade, soil borings and cut
depths took priority over the culvert invert elevations. In all cases, the soil boring data supports the
legal grade determination on both the upstream and downstream sides of culvert crossings. Culvert
crossings installed or repaired in the future should be installed to the depth of the legal ditch grade.

Profile Plot
A profile of the entire drainage system was developed from the existing surface generated by the
topographic survey. The profile shows the existing ground elevation of the centerline of the open ditch
and the top of the ditch bank. All materials used to develop the legal ditch grade were plotted on the
profile which included the soil boring elevations, original cut depths, and culvert elevations.
Mainline
The legal ditch grade of the mainline was based off the originally designed ditch grades which included
the following:
• 0.04% for the beginning of the open ditch along 80th Street NW in Section 11 of Kragero
Township
• 0.13% near the beginning of the Branch 1 connection through Section 11 of Kragero Township
• 0.04% from 500 feet west of 140th Street NW in Section 11 to near the center of Section 12 of
Kragero Township
• 0.02% for the remainder of the open ditch to the outlet in Section 33 of Big Bend Township
The legal ditch grades from the original design were plotted along the profile to create a line of best fit
of all the points graphed on the profile. The line of best fit matches well with the soil borings and the
original cut depths. Some minor adjustments were made along the 0.13% to 0.05% legal grade
transition near Station 352+00. The 0.13% grade was originally designed to transition to a stretch of
400 feet of 0.05% prior to transitioning to 0.04% to Station 302+00 through Section 12. This transition
of 0.05% was difficult to confirm with the soil borings and original cut depths. Therefore the 0.05%
grade in this stretch was changed to 0.04% which as a result lowers the grade by 0.04 feet in the
upstream potion of the open ditch. Figure 5 shows a sample of the plan and profile plots with the included
data for determining as-built grade.
Figure 5: Plan and Profile of Legal Grade

As shown in Figure 5, the line of best fit passes through the soil borings and is within 0.50 feet of the
original design cut depths throughout the entire mainline. The majority of the culverts do not line up
with the legal grade and are both above and lower than legal grade. The culverts were not the primary
focus of generating the line of best fit/legal ditch grade.
Branch 1
The original design profile for Branch 1 included 1,300 feet of 0.23% grade from the connection of the
mainline upstream. The remainder of Branch 1 was designed at a grade of 0.05% to the beginning of
the open ditch.
Historically, Branch 1 has had routine maintenance with open ditch cleanings, slough repairs, beaver
dam removals, and tree removals. This has kept the Branch 1 channel in good shape with few restrictions
and adequate flow. There are also spoil piles along the ditch banks from ditch cleaning and slough
repairs.
The analysis of legal grade was conducted similarly as the mainline, however the original cut depths do
not line up with the majority of the existing ditch due to the spoil piles. With the spoil piles, the cut
depth in much higher than originally constructed. To determine the legal grade, a line of best fit was
created with the existing ground centerline shots as the majority of the ditch was freshly cleaned with
the firm bottom exposed. The grade of 0.05% for Branch 1 was extended farther downstream to a point
130 feet upstream of 80th Street NW. From this point, the design grade of 0.23% was continued to the
connection point along the mainline.
Branch 2
The design grade of Branch 2 is 0.05% and the alignment currently lies within the DNR Basin ID
12009400. Due to this impoundment and the alignment of Branch 2, the line of best fit analysis does
not show any significance, as the as-built conditions are substantially different than the existing
conditions. The basin is over 4 feet deep in areas and no original top of bank can be identified from the
survey. For purposes of legal grade establishment, the grade of 0.05% was extended from the
connection point at the mainline 450 upstream to the beginning of Branch 2 where it connects to the
basin.
Profile Summary
The legal grade established for JCD 9 shows that the majority of the existing open ditch bottom is above
legal grade. The legal ditch from the beginning of the mainline (upstream) to the 50th Street NW and
120th Avenue NW intersection shows the soil borings lining up very close to the legal ditch grade. It also
shows the original cuts within 0.50 feet (above/below) from the top of ditch to the legal grade. The ditch
profile in this stretch shows the existing centerline ground between the top of ditch and legal grade,
which is as expected showing sediment accumulation due to lack of maintenance.
The remainder of the open ditch through Section 29 and 33 in Big Bend Township shows the majority
of the existing ground below the legal grade with a few small areas showing the existing ground slightly
above legal grade. The majority of Section 29 in along the mainline contains area with excavated ponds
and major channel alterations. The excavations were significantly below the as-built condition of the
ditch, thus the soil borings are not an accurate representation of the legal channel depth in this section.
From 40th Street NW to the end of the legal ditch, the existing ditch bottom is below legal ditch grade.
This may be caused by several reasons. First, this is at the outlet of the drainage system. At this location
and with the large sized watershed and accumulated large peak flows, the outlet may have had high
enough velocities and constant flow to create self-cleaning conditions. Also, with the large number of
wetland complexes, cattails, and sediment accumulation upstream; sediment transport downstream
may not have occurred at this portion of the ditch. Another factor may be the excavation of the ponds
in Section 29. This may have altered the hydraulic conditions at the outlet as the deep ponds create a
sediment trap which will limit the amount of sediment transfer downstream.
The legal grades of Branch 1 and Branch 2 were primarily based on the connection elevation point of
the mainline. From the connection point at Branch 1, a line of best fit was created to match the majority

of the open ditch that was cleaned recently by using the design grades of 0.23% and 0.05% with the
majority of the open ditch at 0.05%. At the Branch 2 connection point, the grade of 0.05% was carried
through the entire profile which lies predominately in the DNR Basin ID 12009400.
Re-Establishment of Legal Cross Sections

The legal cross sections along JCD 9 were determined by utilizing the topographic survey, original design
cross sectional data, historical aerials, and a balance spreadsheet to compare bottom widths and top
widths throughout. Cross sections of the re-established channel are included in Appendix E.
A spreadsheet was created to analyze the original design cross sections and to re-establish the legal
cross section of JCD9 based on channel geometry. The spreadsheet includes the originally designed side
slope, bottom width, channel depth (cut), and top width. It also includes the legal channel depth (based
on legal grade) and top width.
For analysis, cross sections of JCD 9 were taken approximately every 1,000 feet along the mainline as
done previously. At each station, the originally designed ditch geometry was entered. The legal channel
depth and top width was then computed based on original design bottom, the legal grade outlined
above, and topographic survey identified top of ditch. A sample of this analysis is shown below in Figure
6.
Figure 6: Typical Cross Section Analysis of Mainline

This methodology was repeated for the selected cross sections throughout the JCD 9 mainline. In areas
where the existing ground surface was below the legal ditch grade, the legal channel depth and top
width was not calculated. This was the case for areas that contained ponds or impoundments near the
downstream end and near the DNR Basin ID 12009400. Table 1 shows the spreadsheet with the analyzed
cross section data.

Table 1: Cross Sectional Data Summary
Original Original Original Original
Legal Legal Legal Top
Design Design Design Design
Station Channel Top Width-3ft
Side Bottom Channel Top
Depth Width Bottom
Slope Width Depth Width
47+40 1.00 3.00 1.9 2 6.2 6.2 7.2
70+30 1.00 2.00 - 2.3 - - 8.6
80+35 1.00 2.00 - 2.6 - - 7.2
90+30 1.00 2.00 - 2.8 - - 7.6
100+30 1.00 2.00 - 2.8 - - 7.6
110+50 1.00 2.00 - 3 - - 8.0
120+15 1.00 1.50 - 3 - - 8.0
130+30 1.00 1.50 2.6 3.2 7.0 8.1 7.9
140+30 1.00 1.50 0.8 3 4.0 4.7 8.0
150+35 1.0 2.0 2.7 3 7.2 8.2 8.0
160+20 1.0 2.0 2.1 3 6.6 7.2 8.0
170+40 1.0 2.0 3.1 3 8.2 9.0 8.0
180+10 1.0 2.0 2.8 2.8 7.5 8.2 7.6
190+60 1.0 2.0 2.2 3 6.6 7.4 8.0
200+30 1.0 1.5 2.3 3.2 7.4 7.8 7.9
210+20 1.0 1.5 - 3.2 - - 7.9
220+30 1.0 1.5 0.7 3.2 4.2 4.6 7.9
230+25 1.0 2.0 1.3 3 4.6 5.0 8.0
240+20 1.0 2.0 1.3 2.8 6.2 5.6 7.6
250+20 1.0 1.5 1.5 3.2 4.6 6.5 7.9
260+30 1.0 1.5 3.0 3.2 7.4 8.7 7.9
270+30 1.0 1.5 3.9 3.2 9.4 10.8 7.9
280+30 1.0 1.5 2.5 3.2 6.6 7.7 7.9
291+10 1.0 2.0 1.4 2.3 4.5 6.2 7.6
300+40 1.0 2.0 1.6 3 5.4 6.3 8.0
310+30 1.0 3.0 3.2 2.3 9.7 9.5 7.6
320+50 1.0 3.0 3.2 2.7 9.0 9.0 8.4
330+30 1.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 8.7 8.7 8.4
340+30 1.0 3.0 1.9 2.2 7.4 7.2 7.4
350+25 1.0 3.0 2.2 1.5 6.8 6.6 6.0
360+40 1.0 3.0 4.9 2 13.2 13.2 7.0
- Indicates Legal Profile Grade Above Existing Grade
x.x Not included in column total calculations
Column Total 55.7 66.7 168.4 182.4 186.1

For accuracy of the legal ditch geometry analysis, a summation of the legal channel depths and originally
designed channel depths were compared. This showed the originally designed channel at a value of 66.7
feet and the legal channel determined by the profile analysis of 55.7 feet. Based on this comparison,
the legal ditch grade is shallower than what was originally designed. However, based on the soil boring
elevations and line of best fit generation, there is not enough supporting evidence to lower the legal
grade closer to the design grade so the summation values are closer.
The same analysis was done comparing the legal top width to the original designed top width. Again,
the legal top width summation value was less than the originally designed top width summation. Another
scenario with a legal bottom width of 3-feet was analyzed and this showed very similar top widths for
the originally designed top width and legal top width. Therefore it is determined that the legal bottom
width of the JCD 9 mainline is 3-feet.
This is a fair assumption base on aerial photo reviews and based on technology in 1910. Most original
ditches were excavated utilizing dredging equipment with 1 size fits all buckets. Typical buckets were
3-4 feet deep, 2-3 feet wide, and side slopes of 1:1. While legal grade could be adjusted easily, channel
widths normally were constructed the same.
Similar to the mainline, Branch 1 and Branch 2 were designed with a varying cross section but were
likely constructed with the same geometry as the mainline base on equipment available. The cross
section of Branch 1 has been slightly changed through the years due to open ditch cleaning and slough
repairs. The existing ditch bottom is close to the as-built width of 3-feet, however the side slopes have
been flattened to clean up unstable soils along the ditch banks. Figure 7 shows a typical cross section
of Branch 1.
Figure 7: Typical Cross Section of Branch 1
The existing cross section of Branch 2 no longer exists for the beginning 500 feet due to the DNR Basin
ID 12009400 impoundment. Currently the cross section is entirely permanent water and the open
channel is inundated. The remaining 450 feet from the basin to the mainline is a small open channel
outlet. The open ditch outlet currently is overgrown with cattails and has not been maintained. Therefore
the legal portion of Branch 2 includes a 3-foot bottom channel with 1:1 side slopes for 450 feet from
the mainline.
Recommendation
This report outlines the process in which the legal drainage system of JCD 9 was determined. The
information used in determining the as-built of JCD 9 includes the original designs of JCD 9, a 2016
topographic survey, historical aerial photographs, and soil borings. Utilizing this information and
performing the analysis as described above, the following conclusions of the legal grade are as follows.

Mainline
The mainline includes a 3-foot wide channel bottom with 1:1 side slopes for the entirety of the open
ditch and follows the current alignment as referenced in Appendix C. At the beginning of the open ditch,
the legal grade is 0.04% for 1,300 feet along the 80th Street NW ROW. Approximately 250 feet
downstream of the Branch 1 junction, the legal grade is 0.13% for 1,600 feet up to a point 500 feet
upstream of 140th Avenue NW in Section 11 of Kragero Township. From this point, the legal grade is
0.04% for 4,600 feet downstream to a point 1,150 feet upstream of 70th Street NW. The legal grade is
0.02% from this point until the termination of the legal ditch in Section 33 of Big Bend Township.
Branch 1
Branch 1 includes a 3-foot bottom width with 1:1 side slopes, following the alignment referenced in
Appendix C. The legal grade is 0.05% at the beginning of Branch 1 to a point 130 feet upstream from
the connection to the mainline. From this point, the legal grade is 0.23% to the connection with the
mainline.
Branch 2
Branch 2 includes a 3-foot bottom width with 1:1 side slopes at a legal grade of 0.05% for 450 feet
from the mainline connection. The remainder of Branch 2 lies in the DNR Basin ID 12009400 and repairs
along this branch will require DNR public waters permits. Therefore this portion of Branch 2 is not
included in the legal drainage system.
Summary
This re-establishment of records report outlines the determination of the legal drainage system of
Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9. This report and all attachments shall be kept in the
drainage system records and used for reference when any repair projects are slated. While this
document clearly identifies the legal drainage system for JCD 9, additional permitting or mitigation for
Public Waters and wetland impacts may be required through the MnDNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wetland Conversation Act, and other agencies prior to repairs being completed.

APPENDIX A:
WATERSHED MAPS
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Appendix A

Holloway Grant Douglas Todd
Depu e St
5
6 38 County County County
Ho rn St
Traverse 60
)
" 50th St SW
Section 31
Holloway 76019800
Section 32 Section 33 Sh a w County
Moyer
Township
Moyer
Moyer St Section 35
Township
Township Holloway
Section 36 Section 31
Section 32
Township
Moyer
Township
Marysland
Marysland
Stevens
Section 33
Pope34
Section Stearns
1 6 0 th
Township
Township County
Marysland
Township County
Marysland
County
Township
5
6 36 59
£
¤ ve
SW Project Location
A
Big Stone
County 60th St SW
Section 6 Section 5
Edison
Township
Edison
Section 4
Edison
Section 3 Section 2 Section 1
Swift
County
Township Edison Section 6
Township West Bank Section 3
Township West Bank
Township West Bank West Bank
Township
Township
Kandiyohi
Township
61
)
" County
76019000
5
6 8 70th St SW
Lac Qui Parle Chippewa
190 th Ave SW
Section 7 Section 8
County County
140 th Ave SW
Edison
Edison
Township Edison Section 11 Section 12
Township
Township
Edison
Edison Section 7 Section 8
Township
Township
Edison
West Bank Section 9 Section 10
Township West Bank
Township Township
Renville
Township
Yellow Medicine County

80th St SW County Redwood
County
Section 18
85th St SW Edison Section 16 Section 15
76018700
Township Edison
Township
Edison
5
6
9 Section 14
Edison
Section 13 Section 18 Section 17
Swift
Township Township
Edison
West Bank Section 16 Section 15
Township West Bank
Township Township Township
County
130th Ave SW
110th Ave SW
5
6
170th Ave SW
6 90th St SW
76018400
76018600
76018400 Section 20
Edison Section 21 Section 22 Section 23 Section 24
Township Edison Township Edison Section 19
Edison Section 20
Edison Section 21
200 th Ave SW
Township
Township
Township
West Bank West Bank Section 22
Township
Township Township
100th Ave NW
76010900
100th St SW
150th Ave SW 76010900
180th Ave SW
Edison Section 28 Section 27
120 th Ave SW
Edison Section 26
Township Edison Edison Section 30
Township
Township Edison Section 29 Section 28
Township
Township
West Bank West Bank Section 27
Township
Township
West Bank West Bank 62
)
"
0
Township
Chippewa JCD 952Watershed

Township
H3
)
"
CSA
Area=17,200 Acres
76011700 6
5 2 110th St SW
65
"
)
76011700
Section 32
Edison
Township
Section 33
Edison
Township
Section 34
Edison
Township
Section 35
Edison
Section 36
Edison
5
6 17

Township West Bank
Township
Township
West Bank 115th St SW
Township
105 th Ave SW
Chip Swift St NW
120th St SW
T-30 1
Section 6
103 rd Ave NW
Section 5
Kragero
Kragero
Section 4 Section 3
Township Kragero Section 2
Township Kragero
Kragero
Section 1 Section 6
Township Township Kragero Section 5 Section 4
Township Big Bend Big Bend Section 3
180th Ave NW
Township
Township Township
Big Bend
Township
Big Bend 11
"
)
Township
T-10 83rd St NW
80th St NW
90th Ave NW
5
6 30
150 th Ave NW
Section 7 Section 8
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Watershed Maps\18675 Full Watershed.mxd
12007600 Section 10
Kragero Section 9
Kragero Section 11
Township Kragero Township Kragero Section 12
Township Section 7
0th Ave NW
Township
Kragero
Kragero Section 8 Section 9
12007600 Township
Township
Big Bend
Township
Big Bend Big Bend
Section 10
Big Bend
170th Ave NW
Township
Township
Township
70th St NW
T-13
16
Section 18 Section 17 5
6 10
JCD 9 Open Ditch
140th Ave NW
Kragero
Kragero
Section 13
120th Ave NW
4th
Township Kragero
190t h A
Township
Township
Township
Kragero
Big Bend Section 16 Section 15
St
Township Big Bend

Township Big Bend Big Bend
Township
El
Township
3rd St
Township
ev
12007900
ve
ato
130th Ave NW
NW
Garfield Ave
ß 40
r
M I NNESO T A
40
Rd
60th St NW
H 12007900 Milan
NT
M
Section 20
Kragero Township
Section 21
Kragero
12009400
37004602 Township
Kragero
Kragero Section 24 Section 19 Section 20
Township
Township Kragero Township Big Bend Section 21 Section 22
Big Bend
Township Big Bend
ß 7 Township Big Bend

ª
M I NNESO T A
Township
Chippewa
Township
CSAH 31
Section 30 50th St NW
County
Kragero 34
)
"
Township
Section 29
Kragero Section 28
Section 30
Lac qui Parle
Township
5
6 31 Township Kragero Township Kragero
Township
Section 25
Kragero
Section 30
Big Bend
Section 29
Big Bend
Township Township
Township Township
Big Bend
Township
Big Bend
5
6 9
155th Ave NW
Township
)
"73
Section 32
Kragero
Township 12
"
) 40th St NW
12
)
"
Section 31
Lac qui Parle
5
6 33 Section 34
331 st Ave
Section 35
Township Kragero
Kragero
Township Kragero Section 32 Section 33
Section 32 Township Big Bend
Big Bend Section 34
Section 33 Township
Township Big Bend
Big Bend
Lac qui Parle Kragero Township Township
Township
Legend
Township Township
M
Section 4 N
37004601 Kragero TH
Watershed Township 7 30th St NW
T-77 Section 6 Section 5 Section 3
11 0th Ave NW
Lac qui
Parle TownshipJCD 9 Open Ditch
Lac qui Parle
Township
Kragero Section 2
Section 1
Section 4 Township Section 6
341st Ave
Kragero
Counties Section 3
Lac qui Township Tunsberg Tunsberg
Township Township Tunsberg
Parle Township Township Tunsberg
Township Township
5
6 26 270th St
Township, Range La
ke Section 10 20th St NW
12007500
20th
St N
95th Ave NW
33
Sections Kragero Township "
)
R
Section 7
6
d
DNR Public Waters

Lac qui Parle Inventory
Section 8
532
351st Ave
Lac qui Parle Section 9 Section 11

Township Lac qui Parle
Township Kragero
Township Section 12
Section 8
262ndBWSR State Easements
Township
12008900
371st Ave
St Kragero
Tunsberg
Township Tunsberg
Township Tunsberg
Township
Municipalities Township
CR
260th St
-3
4
Figure 1
PN: 15-18675 Source:
E
0 0.5 1 2
JCD 9 Full Watershed Map

Municipalities (MnGeo/MN DOT, 5/29/2014)
Miles Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)

Chippewa and Swift County, Minnesota
1 inch = 1 miles
USGS Streams (MN DNR, January, 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Thursday, October 19, 2017
Section 16
Edison Section 15
Section 14 Grant Douglas Todd
Edison
Township
Section 18 County County County
Township West Bank
Township Traverse West Bank Section 16
West Bank
61
"
) County Township
Swift
Township
Stevens Pope Stearns
6
5 9 County 5
66 90th St SW
County County County
Big Stone
V
U257
Project Location
County
76018600
130th Ave SW
120th Ave SW
Section 21
Edison Township
Section 22
Edison Section 23 Swift
County
Edison Section 24
Township Section 20
Township West Bank
West Bank Section 21
Township West Bank
Township
Township Kandiyohi
170th Ave SW
160 th Ave SW
County
V
U 241 76010900 Lac Qui Parle Chippewa
U
115
V County County
76010900 100th St SW
140th Ave SW
Section 28
Renville
Edison Section 27
Section 26 Yellow Medicine County
County
Township Edison
Township Edison
Township
Section 25
Edison Township
Section 30
Section 29 Redwood
County
Township West Bank
Township West Bank
Township
U
V 244
52
"
) 110t h St SW
Chippewa JCD 9 Watershed U
238
Area=17,200 Acres
V 98
V
U 5
62
150th Ave SW
Section 33 65
"
)
Section 34
Edison
Edison Section 35
Township
Edison Section 31
Township
Township West Bank
Township
Township
3
V
U Chip Swift St NW
V
U345 120th St SW
V
U220
160th Ave NW
103rd Ave NW
Section 4
Section 3
Kragero
Kragero Section 2
Township Section 6
Township Big Bend
Big Bend Section 4
Township Big Bend
Township
Township
11 83rd St NW
V
U
71
U
V 10
U
V 80th St NW
Section 9
Kragero Section 10
Kragero Section 11
Township
Kragero Section 12
Township
Township Big Bend
Big Bend Section 9
Township Township Big Bend
150 th Ave NW
Township
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Watershed Maps\18675 Legal Ditch Watershed.mxd
12
V
U
110th Ave NW
13
U
V
MN 70th St NW T-13
TH
7
Section 16
Kragero Section 15
Section 14
4th
Kragero
Township Section 18
St

Central Ave 2 Big Bend Section 16
M-
Township Big Bend
Chippewa
Township Big Bend
Township
Washing ton Ave V
U 77 Township
Milan 9
V
U
County
3rd St
JCD 9 Open Ditch

Ele
S 2nd St
to
va
S 1st St
5th St
S 4th St
r Rd
60th St NW
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
Section 21 12009400
Section 22 80
V
U
158th Ave NW
Kragero Section 23
Kragero
Township
Township Big Bend
Big Bend Section 21
Township Big Bend
Township
140th Ave NW
Township
72
V
U
16
U
V
50th St NW
18
U
V
130th Ave NW
74
U
V
Section 28
Township Kragero Township Kragero Section 25
Section 30
Township Big Bend
Big Bend Section 28
155th Ave NW
Township Big Bend

Township
Township
120th Ave NW
34
)
"
Legend 5
631
75
V
U 12
)
" 40th St NW
73
V
U ß 7
ª
M I NNESO T A
Watershed
1 00
JCD 9 Open Ditch

th Ave NW
Section 34
Kragero Section 35
Kragero Section 36
Counties Section 31
Township
Township Big Bend
Big Bend
Section 33
Township Big Bend
Section 33
Township, Range
Township
Township
Kragero
Township
Sections
DNR
SectionPublic
4 Waters Inventory
Kragero 6
532
23
V
U
37004601
BWSR State Easements
Township
30th St NW 5
6 9
Municipalities Section 3
Kragero Township
Figure 2
E
0 1,750 3,500 7,000
JCD 9 Ditch Watershed Map


1 inch = 3,500 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
APPENDIX B:
ORIGINAL DESIGN DOCUMENTS
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Appendix B

APPENDIX C: APPENDIX A:
ALIGNMENT MAPS
NDIX A:
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Appendix C

98
U
V
160th Ave SW
Section 35
Edison
Township
V
U 241 Section 36
Edison Section 31 65
)
"
V
U
Ave SW
238
Ave SW
Township West Bank
130th
Ave SW
150th
120th
Township
Ave SW
140th
6
5 9
Chip Swift St NW 3
V
U 120th St SW
U
V345
120th
Chip Swif t
St SW V
U345
St NW U
V
220
110th Ave NW
Section 2
Kragero 74
U
V Section 1
Township Big Bend Section 5
Township Big Bend
34
"
) Township
Branch 1
83rd St NW 11
U
V
80th St NW
Ave NW
80th St NW
150th
10
U
V
120th Ave NW
Beginning of Mainline
Section 11
Kragero Section 12
75 77 Section 8
5
610 Township U
V Big Bend
Township
U
V Big Bend Section 9
Big Bend
Township
140th Ave NW
Township
130th Ave NW
70th St NW
13
U
V
Ave NW
70th St NW T-13
110th
Section 14
Kragero Section 13
Township Big Bend 34
"
) Section 16
Township Big Bend
Township
60th
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
St NW
74
V
U 60th St NW
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
80
U
V
Ave NW
140th
Ave NW
120th Ave NW
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Alignment Maps\18675 Legal Alignment.mxd
Branch 2 12009400
103rd
Section 23
Kragero Section 24
110th Ave NW
Township Big Bend

Township
Ave NW
130th
50th
16
V
U 77
V
U
St NW
18
V
U 50th St NW
MN
TH
7
Section 26
Kragero Section 25
Township Big Bend
Township
ß 7
ª
M I NNESO T A
40th St NW
5
6 31
12
"
) 40th St NW 12
)
"
74
U
V Chippewa JCD 9 Watershed
"
)
Ave NW
130th
Section 35
Ave NW
Section 36
Kragero
5
6
120th
32
Section 33
V
U75 Township Big Bend
Big Bend
Ave NW
Township
M
110th
Township
N
TH
7
Legend
End of Mainline
Watershed
ß 7
ª
Ave NW
M I NNESO T A
140th
Current Alignment 23
V
U 30th St NW
As37004601
Built Alignment
Original Design Alignment
DNR Public Waters Inventory
37004601
Figure 1
E
0 1,250 2,500 5,000
Overall Alignment Map


1 inch = 2,500 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Ave SW
160th
Ave SW
150th
Chip Swift St NW
3
U
V U
V241
U
V345 120th St SW
Ditch Re-Alignment
140th Ave NW
Beginning of Branch 1
5
6
10 Section 2
Kragero
Township
74
V
U
Section 1
Kragero
Township
Beginning of Mainline
80th
St NW
10
U
V 80th St NW
Branch 1 and Mainline Connection

Ave NW
150th
5
6
10
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Alignment Maps\18675 Legal Alignment North.mxd
Section 11
Kragero
Township
Section 12
74
V
U Kragero
Township
Ave NW
140th
70th
St NW
13
U
V 70th St NW
70th St NW
Chippewa JCD 9 Watershed

Area=17,200 Acres
Section 14
Legend
Kragero
Township
Section 13
Kragero
Watershed 74
V
U Township
Current Alignment
6 AsOriginal
510
Built Alignment
Design Alignment
Ave NW

150th
Figure 2
E
0 500 1,000 2,000
North Alignment Map


1 inch = 1,000 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Ave NW
130th
Section 18
Big Bend
Township Section 17
Big Bend
Township
77
V
U
120th Ave NW
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
60th St NW
ß 40
ª
60th St NW
M I NNESO T A
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
Branch 2 and Mainline Connection
75
V
U
12009400
Beginning of Branch 2
Section 19
Big Bend
Township Section 20
Big Bend
120th Ave NW
Township
77
U
V
Ave NW
130th
Ditch Re-Alignment
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Alignment Maps\18675 Legal Alignment Middle.mxd
50th St NW 18
V
U 50th St NW 18
U
V

Area=17,200 Acres
75
U
V
Section 30
Big Bend
Township Section 29
Big Bend
Township
Ave NW
130th
Ave NW
120th
Legend
40th St NW 12
"
) 40th St NW 12
"
)
Watershed 12
"
) 40th St NW
Current Alignment
As Built Alignment
77
V
U
Figure 3
E
0 500 1,000 2,000
Middle Alignment Map


1 inch = 1,000 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
34
)
"
110th Ave NW
18
V
U
50th St NW
Ave NW
100th
18
V
U
Section 29
Big Bend
Township Section 28
Big Bend
Township
34
"
)
Ave NW
110th
Open Water
Pond Excavations
12
"
) 40th St NW
12
)
" 40th St NW
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Alignment Maps\18675 Legal Alignment South.mxd
100th Ave NW
Ave NW
110th
Section 32
Big Bend
Township Section 33
Big Bend
Township
5
6 9
34
"
)
End of Mainline

Area=17,200 Acres
23
V
U 30th St NW
30th
23 V
U
St NW
Ave NW
110th
Legend
Ave NW
100th
Watershed 34
"
)
Current Alignment
As Built Alignment
5
69
Figure 4
E
0 500 1,000 2,000
South Alignment Map


1 inch = 1,000 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
98
U
V
160th Ave SW
Section 35
Edison
Township
U
V 241 Section 36
Edison Section 31
Ave SW
Ave SW
Township West Bank
130th
Ave SW
150th
120th
Township
U
V 238
Ave SW
140th
6
5 9
Chip Swift St NW 3
V
U 120th St SW
65
)
"
U
V345
120th
Chip Swif t
St SW U
V345
U
St NW V
220
110th Ave NW
Section 2
Kragero Section 1
Township Big Bend
34
"
) Township
Branch 1
83rd St NW 11
V
U
74
U
V
80th St NW
Ave NW
80th St NW
150th
10
U
V
120th Ave NW
Beginning of Mainline 75
V
U
Section 11
Kragero Section 12
Section 8
77
V
U
5
610 Township Big Bend
Township Big Bend
Township
Section 9
Big Bend
140th Ave NW
Township
130th Ave NW
70th St NW
13
U
V
Ave NW
70th St NW T-13
110th
Section 14
Kragero Section 13
Township Big Bend
Township
34
)
"
60th
ß 40
ª
M I NNE SO T A
St NW
74
V
U 60th St NW
ß 40
ª
M I NNE SO T A
80
U
V
S:\Projects\18000 PROJ\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Alignment Maps\18675 Legal Alignment Summary.mxd
Ave NW
140th
Ave NW
120th Ave NW
Branch 2 12009400
103rd
Section 23
Kragero Section 24 75
U
V
110th Ave NW
Township Big Bend

Township
Ave NW
130th
77
V
U
50th
16
V
U
St NW
18
V
U 50th St NW
MN
TH
7
Section 26
Kragero Section 25
Township Big Bend
Township
ß 7
ª
M I NNE SO T A
40th St NW
5
6 31
12
"
) 40th St NW 12
)
"
"
)
Ave NW
130th
Section 35
Ave NW
Legend
Section 36
Kragero
5
6
120th
32
Watershed
Big Bend
Ave NW
Township
M
110th
Township
N
TH
Grade 7 75
V
U
0.02%
End of Mainline
0.04%
ß 7
ª
Ave NW
M I NNE SO T A
140th
0.05% 30th St NW 23
U
V
0.13%
37004601
0.23%
37004601
Figure 5
E
0 1,250 2,500 5,000
Alignment + Profile Summary Map


1 inch = 2,500 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Monday, November 20, 2017
APPENDIX D:
PLAN AND PROFILES
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Appendix D

3
NO.
991
992
NW
AVE
991
TH
991 EXISTING TREELINE, TYP.
110
92
88
91
87
991
90
89
990
0
99
86
994
9994
990
9
85
993
5
99
99
84
79
988 0
80
83
81
78
992
82
989
77
991 0 200 400
76
991
990
SCALE IN FEET
75
12
NO.
74
PROFILE SCALES
54
73
55
NW
72
E T 56
71
E
53
TR
987
S EXISTING CENTERLINE 10
70
T H 52
40
69
98
57
6
W
68
67
51
66
988
50
V
58
992
49
991
59
E
65
48
990
20
60
61
62
63
R
64
47
990 989
46
992 988 T.
45
0 100 200
44
43
3
0
SCALE IN FEET
42
2 3
41
991
3
40
39
99
38
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
36
991
35 43359
991
DATE LIC. NO.
33
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
32
0
990
99
98
31
9
30
989
END OF LEGAL DITCH
29
DATE LIC. NO.
28
27
NOTE: PROJECT
Source Elevation=985.130
1000 1000
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
Station=37+94.99
EXISTING LEGAL GRADE, TYP. EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) END OF LEGAL DITCH
DITCH No. 9
1.85'
980 SOIL BORING, TYP. 980 REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
970 970
987.15
987.13
987.11
987.09
987.07
987.05
987.03
987.01
986.99
986.97
986.95
986.93
986.91
986.89
986.87
986.85
986.83
986.81
986.79
986.77
986.75
986.73
986.71
986.69
986.4
986.5
986.0
985.6
986.7
987.2
986.1
986.8
986.8
986.7
986.6
986.6
986.5
986.0
986.4
986.4
986.3
986.2
986.2
986.1
986.1
986.0
985.9
985.9
985.8
960 55+00 54+00 53+00 52+00 51+00 50+00 49+00 48+00 47+00 46+00 45+00 44+00 43+00 42+00 41+00 40+00 39+00 38+00 37+00 36+00 35+00 34+00 33+00 32+00 31+00 960
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000
Station=76+67.59
REVIEWED BY CJB
110TH AVENUE NW 40TH STREET NW
EXISTING CULVERT ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/05/2017
I(W)=984.96 EXISTING CULVERT ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP. CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
I(E)=983.61 I(N)=984.44
990 I(S)=983.99 990 TITLE
1.62'
2.19'
LEGAL PLAN &

980 980
PROFILES MAINLINE
970 970
SHEET
987.67
987.65
987.63
987.61
987.59
987.57
987.55
987.53
987.51
987.49
987.47
987.45
987.43
987.41
987.39
987.37
987.35
987.33
987.31
987.29
987.27
987.25
987.23
987.21
987.19
987.7
988.2
993.7
988.1
987.7
987.7
986.4
987.5
987.5
987.7
987.6
987.6
987.5
987.3
987.1
986.8
986.7
986.9
986.7
986.8
986.4
986.3
986.5
986.5
986.5
960 81+00 80+00 79+00 78+00 77+00 76+00 75+00 74+00 73+00 72+00 71+00 70+00 69+00 68+00 67+00 66+00 65+00 64+00 63+00 62+00 61+00 60+00 59+00 58+00 57+00 960
2 OF 15
99
2
9
13
8
13
995
7
13
6
13
992
135
134
133
9
132
2
131
991
130
129
128
127
EXISTING DITCH CENTERLINE 0 200 400
126
125
994 SCALE IN FEET
99
124
2
123
2
12 PROFILE SCALES
1
12
10
120
989
119
118
117
992 V
116 991 E
20
R
998990
5
T.
987
11
989
988
114
0 100 200
112
113
991
111
110
109
2
108
99992
107
0
106
105
104
SCALE IN FEET
989
98
103
992
102
101
100
99
991
994
98
97
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
96
995
988
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
95
998
94
EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. 991
994
93
996
92
99 988 DATE LIC. NO. 43359
88
91
2 990
87
90
89
0
99
86
9994
85
5
99
84
988
83
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
82
989
DATE LIC. NO.
O . 12
N
WITHOUT
T W WRITTEN CONSENT.
NPRIOR
RE E
NOTE: H S T
40T
PROJECT
1000 1000
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
EXISTING LEGAL GRADE, TYP.

2.8'
DITCH No. 9
1.97'
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
980 (2016 SURVEY) 980 REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
970 970
988.19
988.17
988.15
988.13
988.11
988.09
988.07
988.05
988.03
988.01
987.99
987.97
987.95
987.93
987.91
987.89
987.87
987.85
987.83
987.81
987.79
987.77
987.75
987.73
987.71
987.8
988.3
988.3
988.3
988.2
988.2
988.0
987.2
988.1
987.7
987.6
987.3
987.6
987.6
987.9
987.8
986.3
985.4
985.9
988.1
987.0
987.2
987.6
987.6
988.0
960 107+00 106+00 105+00 104+00 103+00 102+00 101+00 100+00 99+00 98+00 97+00 96+00 95+00 94+00 93+00 92+00 91+00 90+00 89+00 88+00 87+00 86+00 85+00 84+00 83+00 960
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675

Station=121+60.36
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP. CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
990 990 TITLE
2.01'
2.94'
2.98'
SOIL BORING, TYP.

LEGAL PLAN &
980 980
PROFILES MAINLINE
970 970
SHEET
988.71
988.69
988.67
988.65
988.63
988.61
988.59
988.57
988.55
988.53
988.51
988.49
988.47
988.45
988.43
988.41
988.39
988.37
988.35
988.33
988.31
988.29
988.27
988.25
988.23
989.6
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.4
988.8
988.8
989.0
988.5
988.4
988.1
988.0
988.2
988.0
988.1
988.1
988.2
988.2
988.1
987.6
987.7
960 133+00 132+00 131+00 130+00 129+00 128+00 127+00 126+00 125+00 124+00 123+00 122+00 121+00 120+00 119+00 118+00 117+00 116+00 115+00 114+00 113+00 112+00 111+00 110+00 109+00 960
3 OF 15
994
993
3
99
996
99998
7
995 994 995
191
193
192
190
189
0
188
187
2
186
183
184
182
185
181
180
1 79
177
176
178
4
MN DNR BASIN
5.8
175
ID # 12009400
+0
0 200 400
=13
174
EP
173
990
SCALE IN FEET
172
992

991
1
PROFILE SCALES
17
993
9
993
0
17
10
99
2
2
169
4
99
168
V
NW
993
167
E ET 20 E
W
16
R R
ST
E N
T.
5
TH
AV
16
999944
9
993 994 100
999922
5 0 1 0 100 200
H
4
99
T
991
16
5
998
20
1
1
996 0
3
16
SCALE IN FEET
99 990 993
2
3
16
161
160
991
9
99
995
992
15
15
5
152
3
15
151
15
4
99
150
15
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. 7 5
15
149
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
156
99
148
7
5
147
99
146
992
145
998
144
43359
143
995 DATE LIC. NO.
142
992
141
140
139
138
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
137
136
135
134
133
131
132
5
99
DATE LIC. NO.
99
2
INTERSECTION OF NOTE: PROJECT
Station=159+36.15
Station=157+43.54
Station=154+70.35
Station=146+95.88
Station=140+10.76
50TH STREET NW &
120TH AVENUE NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
1000 1000
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
DITCH No. 9
2.84'
2.27'
EXISTING CULVERT EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
2.75'
SOIL BORING, TYP. CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
I(N)=987.48
980 I(S)=987.15 980 REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
970 970
989.23
989.21
989.19
989.17
989.15
989.13
989.11
989.09
989.07
989.05
989.03
989.01
988.99
988.97
988.95
988.93
988.91
988.89
988.87
988.85
988.83
988.81
988.79
988.77
988.75
989.3
989.4
987.0
997.8
988.3
989.8
989.5
990.8
990.8
990.7
990.6
990.5
990.5
990.4
990.3
990.2
990.1
990.1
989.8
989.8
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.5
989.6
960 159+00 158+00 157+00 156+00 155+00 154+00 153+00 152+00 151+00 150+00 149+00 148+00 147+00 146+00 145+00 144+00 143+00 142+00 141+00 140+00 139+00 138+00 137+00 136+00 135+00 960
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
Station=180+02.71
Station=169+76.31
DRAWN BY ---
DESIGNED BY --
1000 1000 REVIEWED BY --
ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP.
2.46'
2.8'
990 990 TITLE
LEGAL PLAN &

980 980
PROFILES MAINLINE
970 970
SHEET
989.75
989.73
989.71
989.69
989.67
989.65
989.63
989.61
989.59
989.57
989.55
989.53
989.51
989.49
989.47
989.45
989.43
989.41
989.39
989.37
989.35
989.33
989.31
989.29
989.27
991.6
991.6
991.6
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
989.8
990.0
990.2
990.1
990.0
989.9
989.8
989.8
989.7
960 185+00 184+00 183+00 182+00 181+00 180+00 179+00 178+00 177+00 176+00 175+00 174+00 173+00 172+00 171+00 170+00 169+00 168+00 167+00 166+00 165+00 164+00 163+00 162+00 161+00 960
4 OF 15
24 8
7
24
8
993 995
99234 997
46
1
2 996
993
245
243
244
242
994
241
995
240
239
238
994
0 200 400
237
994
994
993
236
SCALE IN FEET
995
235
99
2
PROFILE SCALES
234
225
226
227
228
233
229
230
231
232
224
10
991
3
22
993
222
994
V
221
W
993
20 E
N
992
3
99
R
0
AVE
991
22
4 0 T.
NO.
219
EXISTING CENTERLINE
TH
215
216
MN DNR BASIN 0 100 200
217
214
218
140
993
W ID # 12009400
TN
213
E
990
E 0
TR SCALE IN FEET
212
9
990 99 993
209
HS
208
1
210
211
207
60T
206
205
204
202
991
201
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
200
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
9
19
8
19
DATE LIC. NO. 43359
197
991
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
196
996 994
EXISTING BRANCH 2 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
195
CENTERLINE 990
99
194
3
193
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
192
191
190
991
189
992
188
999965 993
DATE LIC. NO.
994
187
186
PROJECT
Station=203+77.99
Station=189+58.52
1000 1000
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

DITCH No. 9
2.74'
2.96'
3.22'
SOIL BORING, TYP.
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
970 970
990.27
990.25
990.23
990.21
990.19
990.17
990.15
990.13
990.11
990.09
990.07
990.05
990.03
990.01
989.99
989.97
989.95
989.93
989.91
989.89
989.87
989.85
989.83
989.81
989.79
990.3
990.4
990.4
990.3
990.7
990.7
990.8
990.9
990.9
991.0
991.1
991.1
991.2
991.3
991.3
991.4
991.5
991.5
991.6
991.7
991.8
991.7
991.7
991.7
991.7
960 211+00 210+00 209+00 208+00 207+00 206+00 205+00 204+00 203+00 202+00 201+00 200+00 199+00 198+00 197+00 196+00 195+00 194+00 193+00 192+00 191+00 190+00 189+00 188+00 187+00 960
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675

Station=234+27.37
XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG

60TH STREET NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000 EXISTING CULVERT 1000 REVIEWED BY CJB
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) I(N)=989.74 ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP. ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/05/2017
I(S)=989.16
EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
990 990 TITLE

2.9'
2.61'
LEGAL PLAN &
980 980
PROFILES MAINLINE
970 970
SHEET
990.79
990.77
990.75
990.73
990.71
990.69
990.67
990.65
990.63
990.61
990.59
990.57
990.55
990.53
990.51
990.49
990.47
990.45
990.43
990.41
990.39
990.37
990.35
990.33
990.31
991.2
991.0
990.6
990.7
990.9
991.3
991.6
991.4
991.3
991.1
991.5
991.4
989.9
990.9
990.3
990.9
991.2
991.0
991.3
990.9
991.0
990.5
990.3
990.6
990.6
960 237+00 236+00 235+00 234+00 233+00 232+00 231+00 230+00 229+00 228+00 227+00 226+00 225+00 224+00 223+00 222+00 221+00 220+00 219+00 218+00 217+00 216+00 215+00 214+00 213+00 960
5 OF 15
295
996
99
5
294
3
29
2
29 99
9

291
994
W
290
995 T N
E
289
E
TR
996
288
S
5
99
996 H SOIL BORING LOCATION, TYP.
0T
287
7
996
286
99
5 0 200 400
285
284
283
SCALE IN FEET
282
281
PROFILE SCALES
280
279
10
278
277
276
275
EXISTING CENTERLINE V
274
3
E
273
20
272
R
271
1
T.
270
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. 0 100 200
269
999945
268
0
267
SCALE IN FEET
266
996
265
264
W
263
99
4
N
262
E
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
V
261
995
A
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
TH
260
0
259
13
258
257
993 995
256
997 997 DATE LIC. NO. 43359
255
254
253
252
996
251
250
994 5 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
99
249
248
993 993
994
995 99
5
247
99
243
5
242
246
241
24
245
240
99
4
3
239
238
237
DATE LIC. NO.
99
4
PROJECT
Station=244+73.60
Station=261+11.26
1000 130TH AVENUE NW 1000

ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP. CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
2.89'
3.02'
3.45'
SOIL BORING, TYP. EXISTING CULVERT DITCH No. 9
I(W)=990.87
I(E)=990.69 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
970 970
991.31
991.29
991.27
991.25
991.23
991.21
991.19
991.17
991.15
991.13
991.11
991.09
991.07
991.05
991.03
991.01
990.99
990.97
990.95
990.93
990.91
990.89
990.87
990.85
990.83
993.3
993.3
993.3
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.0
992.6
992.2
992.2
992.3
992.4
992.5
992.4
992.1
991.7
991.3
997.7
992.2
992.0
991.9
991.4
991.4
960 263+00 262+00 261+00 260+00 259+00 258+00 257+00 256+00 255+00 254+00 253+00 252+00 251+00 250+00 249+00 248+00 247+00 246+00 245+00 244+00 243+00 242+00 241+00 240+00 239+00 960
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
EXISTING CULVERT XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG
I(N)=993.46 70TH XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DESIGNED BY MAO
1010 I(S)=993.65 STREET NW 1010
REVIEWED BY CJB

Station=286+26.91
Station=289+74.51
Station=290+88.29
1000 1000 TITLE

LEGAL PLAN &

990 990
PROFILES MAINLINE
3.12'
3.31'
2.74'

980 980
SHEET
991.88
991.86
991.84
991.82
991.80
991.78
991.76
991.74
991.72
991.70
991.68
991.66
991.64
991.62
991.60
991.58
991.56
991.54
991.52
991.50
991.48
991.46
991.44
991.42
991.40
993.3
993.4
994.8
993.4
993.3
993.6
993.6
993.6
993.6
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.3
970 291+00 290+00 289+00 288+00 287+00 286+00 285+00 284+00 283+00 282+00 281+00 280+00 279+00 278+00 277+00 276+00 275+00 274+00 273+00 272+00 271+00 270+00 269+00 268+00 267+00 970
6 OF 15
1
1000
999 999
998 998
EXISTING TREE, TYP.

0 200 400
338
339
337
336
340
335
341
331
332
334
SCALE IN FEET
330
333
342
329
328
343
327
344
326
345
PROFILE SCALES
325
324
323
322
321
10
320
319
996
318
317
EXISTING CENTERLINE
316
V
315
996
997
314
E
313
20
312
R
311
T.
310
1000
0 100 200
309
996
308
307
2
995
99 0
306
8 SCALE IN FEET
305
304
997
303
998
302
301
300
299
298
297
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
296
14
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
295
996
99
0T
EXISTING POWER
294
H
POLE, TYP.
AV
3
29
EN
DATE LIC. NO. 43359

W
2
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
994
290
289
288
5
99
996 DATE LIC. NO.
287
996
286
99
285
NOTE: PROJECT
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
1000 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) 1000 JOINT COUNTY

DITCH No. 9
2.82'
2.78'
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980 980
992.70
992.66
992.62
992.58
992.54
992.50
992.46
992.42
992.38
992.34
992.30
992.26
992.22
992.18
992.14
992.10
992.08
992.06
992.04
992.02
992.00
991.98
991.96
991.94
991.92
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
993.7
993.8
994.0
994.6
994.6
994.5
994.2
994.0
970 317+00 316+00 315+00 314+00 313+00 312+00 311+00 310+00 309+00 308+00 307+00 306+00 305+00 304+00 303+00 302+00 301+00 300+00 299+00 298+00 297+00 296+00 295+00 294+00 293+00 970
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
Station=324+37.95
Station=341+05.16
1000 ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP. 1000 TITLE
LEGAL PLAN &

990 990
2.33'
PROFILES MAINLINE
2.41'
2.67'
SOIL BORING, TYP.
980 980
SHEET
993.39
993.34
993.29
993.24
993.19
993.14
993.10
993.05
993.00
992.95
992.90
992.85
992.80
992.75
992.70
992.65
992.61
992.56
992.51
992.46
992.41
992.36
992.31
992.26
992.21
994.3
994.3
994.2
994.1
995.4
994.0
994.7
994.2
994.0
994.0
994.0
994.2
994.5
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.3
994.3
970 343+00 342+00 341+00 340+00 339+00 338+00 337+00 336+00 335+00 334+00 333+00 332+00 331+00 330+00 329+00 328+00 327+00 326+00 325+00 324+00 323+00 322+00 321+00 320+00 319+00 970
7 OF 15
2
EXISTING BRANCH 1 CENTERLINE
1000
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
0 200 400
80TH STREET NW 1000
361
362
364
363
368
367
366
365
369
371
360
370
391
381
359
392
390
389
388
394
393
387
386
384
372
396
395
385
383
382
397
380
379
373
398
378
377
376
374
375
SCALE IN FEET
8
35
35
7 PROFILE SCALES
140TH AVE NW
12
6 10
35 00
10
5 EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP.
35
4 V
35
11
3 20 E
EXISTING CENTERLINE 35 R
T.
2
35
0 100 200
1
5
35
0
0
SCALE IN FEET
35
1010 1010
9
34
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
140TH AVENUE NW
347 100
1000 1000
6
34
99
9
345
99
8
DATE LIC. NO. 43359
344
343
990 990 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
342
341
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
340
339
980 980
8
33 DATE LIC. NO.
993.90
993.86
993.82
1000.0
994.5
994.5

970 347+00 346+00 345+00 970 6
3
PROJECT
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
Station=367+81.59
1000
ORIGINAL CUT DESIGN, TYP.
1000 JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
990 990
2.2'
2.59'
REVISION SCHEDULE
SOIL BORING, TYP. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980 980
996.34
996.30
996.26
996.22
996.18
996.05
995.92
995.79
995.66
995.53
995.40
995.27
995.14
995.01
994.88
994.75
994.62
994.49
994.36
994.23
994.10
994.06
994.02
993.98
993.94
998.6
995.4
994.9
996.5
996.5
996.4
996.3
996.3
996.2
996.1
996.1
996.0
996.0
995.9
995.9
995.8
995.7
995.6
995.5
995.5
995.4
995.4
994.8
994.8
997.7
970 372+00 371+00 370+00 369+00 368+00 367+00 366+00 365+00 364+00 363+00 362+00 361+00 360+00 359+00 358+00 357+00 356+00 355+00 354+00 353+00 352+00 351+00 350+00 349+00 348+00 970
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG


1000 1000 TITLE
LEGAL PLAN &
1.9'
990 990
EXISTING LEGAL GRADE, TYP. PROFILES MAINLINE
980 980
SHEET
997.34
997.30
997.26
997.22
997.18
997.14
997.10
997.06
997.02
996.98
996.94
996.90
996.86
996.82
996.78
996.74
996.70
996.66
996.62
996.58
996.54
996.50
996.46
996.42
998.5
998.4
998.4
998.3
998.3
998.2
998.2
998.2
998.1
998.1
998.0
998.0
997.9
997.9
997.9
997.8
997.8
997.7
997.7
997.6
997.7
997.7
997.7
997.6
998.2
970 398+00 397+00 396+00 395+00 394+00 393+00 392+00 391+00 390+00 389+00 388+00 387+00 386+00 385+00 384+00 383+00 382+00 381+00 380+00 379+00 378+00 377+00 376+00 375+00 374+00 970
8 OF 15
11 + 0 0 2 9+00 30+
00 3 1 +0 0 3 2 + 0
10
0
04
1003
02
01
00
33+00 3
4+ 00 35+01090093 3
10604
100
9
6+00 3
7+0
0 3
8+0
0
28 0 3
10 004 5
1 0
39+
10
00
00
27+
40+
00
00
0 200 400
PROFILE SCALES
26+
41100+4
00
00
10
25+
SCALE IN FEET
43+00 42+00
+ 00
24
+00 V
23
+0
0 E
+00 46+00 45+00 44+00 1005

2 20
2 R
0
+0 T.
21
1006
0 100 200
99710023 20+0
0
1+00 0
9299 SCALE IN FEET
1910+005 04
0
+00
1
1000
10
0+00 EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP.
1002
3+00
00
1
00
10
1002 10 004
4+00 18+
1007
03
5+00 00 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
100
6+00 17+ REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
0 51+00 50+00 49+00 48+00 1047

05
1
7+00 6+00 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
10032
01
1002
1000
8+0 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1001
0 15+
80TH STREET NW
9+0 10 +0 0 CHARLES J. BRANDEL

1002
0
04
0 14
10+ + 0
00 03 00 01013
1 0
+ 1 997
2
1
1 1909098 01011+00 12
100 0
0
EXISTING BRANCH 1 MAINLINE DATE LIC. NO. 43359
2
100
2 100
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
53+00 52+0
EXISTING MAINLINE
CENTERLINE
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675

CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES. BR.1 & 2DWG
DRAWN BY JAG
140TH AVE NW DESIGNED BY MAO

1010 1010 TITLE

LEGAL PLAN &
2.82'
2.47'
1000 1000
PROFILE BRANCH 1
3.18'
EXISTING LEGAL GRADE, TYP. EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
990 990
SHEET
996.16
996.39
996.49
996.54
996.58
996.63
996.68
996.73
996.77
996.82
996.87
996.92
996.96
997.01
997.06
997.11
997.15
997.20
997.25
997.30
997.34
997.39
997.44
997.49
997.53
996.5
996.0
996.7
996.4
996.1
996.2
996.5
996.9
997.1
997.3
997.4
996.8
996.7
997.1
997.2
997.1
996.8
996.6
996.4
996.5
997.2
997.2
997.0
997.4
997.2
980 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 980
9 OF 15
11 9+ 00 30 + 00 3 0003
1+00 32+10
10 04
02
01
00
33+00
3 4 + 0
10604
100
0
0 35+01909093
36+00 3
7+0
0 38+
00
28+00 2 1003004 5
1 0
39+
10
00
00
27+
40+
00
00
0 200 400
PROFILE SCALES
26+
41100+4
00
00
10
25+
SCALE IN FEET
43+00 42+00
+00
24
+00 V
23
00 E
+00 46+00 45+00 44+00 1005

+ 20
22 R
0
+0 T.
21
1006
0 100 200
99710023 20+0
0
1+00 0
9299 SCALE IN FEET
1910+005 04
0
+00
1
1000
10
0+00 EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP.
1002
3+00
00
10
00
10
1002 10 04
4+00 18+
1007
03
5+00 00 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
100
6+00 17+ REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
0 51+00 50+00 49+00 48+00 1047

05
1
7+00 16+0 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
10032
1002
1000
0
5+0
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1001 8+0 1
0
80TH STREET NW
1002 9+0 10
04
1 4+00 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
0
10+ 100
1 3 +00
0 3
10 0 +001009197
2
1 1909098 01011+00 12
100
0
EXISTING BRANCH 1 MAINLINE DATE LIC. NO. 43359
1
002 10 02
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
53+00 52+0
EXISTING MAINLINE
CENTERLINE
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

DITCH No. 9
2.44'
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
2.73'

1000 1000
990 990
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
997.63
997.68
997.72
997.77
997.82
997.87
997.91
997.96
998.01
998.06
998.10
998.15
998.20
998.25
998.29
998.34
998.39
998.44
998.48
998.53
998.58
998.63
998.67
998.72
998.77
1000.5
1001.1
1001.2
1001.3
1001.5
1001.8
1001.7
1001.7
1001.8
1002.0
997.4
997.6
997.8
997.8
997.7
997.9
998.0
998.1
998.3
998.4
998.5
999.2
999.9
999.7
999.5
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
980 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+001020 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+001020 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 980 REVIEWED BY CJB
1010 1010 TITLE

2.57'
LEGAL PLAN &

1000 1000
PROFILE BRANCH 1
990 990
SHEET
998.72
998.77
998.82
998.86
998.91
1001.8
1002.0
1002.3
1002.4
1002.0
980 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 980

10 OF 15
MN DNR BASIN
ID # 12009400
0 100 200
PROFILE SCALES
SCALE IN FEET 10
V
992
20 E
13+00 R
T.
12+00 0 100 200
0
11+0
0
1
990
99
0
10+0 SCALE IN FEET
9+00
8+00
7+00 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
6+00
EXISTING BRANCH 2 MAINLINE
5+00
991
DATE LIC. NO. 43359
993
19
0+0
0 3+00 END OF LEGAL DITCH
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1+0 2+00 996
995
0
997
EXISTING MAINLINE DATE LIC. NO.
CENTERLINE
998 AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1010
BRANCH 2 1010
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
DRAWN BY JAG
EXISTING LEGAL GRADE, TYP. DESIGNED BY MAO

1000 EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) 1000 REVIEWED BY CJB
EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/05/2017
MAINLINE
2.12'
2.08'
2.74'
ELEV. 990.18 END OF LEGAL DITCH CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
990 990 TITLE

3.8'
LEGAL PLAN &

980 980
PROFILE BRANCH 2
NOTE:
970 970
SHEET
990.23
990.27
990.32
990.36
990.3
991.9
991.9
991.8
991.0
990.4
990.2
990.6
990.9
991.3
991.2
990.7
990.5
960 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 960
11 OF 15
APPENDIX E:
DITCH CROSS SECTIONS
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Appendix E

1020
47+40 1020 1020
70+30 1020 1020
80+35 1020 1020
100+30 1020
NOTE:
C L
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

PERMANENT POND, TYP.
990 990 990 990 990 990 990 990
LEGAL GRADE BELOW

980 980 980 980 980 POND ELEVATION, TYP. 980 980 980
990.7
990.2
989.7
989.2
989.3
989.1
990.4
988.1
989.2
990.9
990.3
988.6
987.2
988.7
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 970 970 1+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970
110+50 120+15 130+30

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020

DATE LIC. NO. 43359
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.

1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
PROJECT
990 990 990 990 990 990
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

980 980 980 980 980 980
JOINT COUNTY
990.7
988.1
988.0
989.1
985.9
991.5
991.3
991.3
991.3
991.3
991.3
991.4
991.1
990.1
988.6
989.3
990.5
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 970
DITCH No. 9
970 970
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1020
140+30 1020 1020
150+35 1020 1020
160+20 1020 1020
170+40 1020
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675

1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
CAD FILE NAME 18675 SECTIONS
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/05/2017

(2016 SURVEY) TITLE
990 990 990 990 990 990 990 990

MAINLINE SECTIONS
980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
992.3
991.4
990.1
991.7
992.0
992.5
991.9
991.3
992.3
992.4
992.4
992.5
992.5
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 970 SHEET
12 OF 15
1020
180+10 1020 1020
190+60 1020 1020
200+30 1020
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010

NOTE:
C L
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
(2016 SURVEY)
990 990 990 990 990 990
980 980 980 980 980 980

991.46
992.1
990.8
990.2
990.5
991.8
992.3
992.7
993.1
993.6
992.6
992.4
991.3
991.9
992.0
992.1
992.3
992.0
970 1+00 2+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 970 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
210+30 220+30 230+25

CHARLES J. BRANDEL
1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 DATE LIC. NO. 43359
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
DATE LIC. NO.
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
PERMANENT POND, TYP. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
PROJECT
990 990 990 990 990 990
LEGAL GRADE BELOW CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

POND ELEVATION, TYP.
980 980 980 980 980 980
992.1 JOINT COUNTY
991.8
992.0
991.0
991.8
992.4
992.0
991.3
990.7
990.8
990.6
992.2
992.7
991.7
993.0
994.3
DITCH No. 9
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1020
240+20 1020 1020
250+20 1020 1020
260+30 1020 1020
270+30 1020
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
TITLE
990 990 990 990 990 990 990 990
MAINLINE SECTIONS
980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
991.46
993.4
993.0
992.7
995.0
995.3
995.6
994.6
994.1
992.9
992.5
997.1
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 970
SHEET
13 OF 15
1020
280+30 1020 1020
291+10 1020 1020
300+40 1020 1020
310+30 1020
NOTE:
C L
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
990 990 990 990 990 990 990 990
980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
994.2
995.2
994.4
994.0
994.3
995.4
995.5
995.5
995.5
970 1+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970
320+50 330+30 340+30

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020

DATE LIC. NO. 43359
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 DATE LIC. NO.

990 990 990 990 990 990 PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

980 980 980 980 980 980
JOINT COUNTY
995.8
995.6
995.5
995.8
996.1
995.8
995.8
996.1
997.7
997.5
997.5
997.4
997.4
997.3
997.2
997.2
997.3
997.1
997.7
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 970
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
350+25 360+40 375+10

DATE DESCRIPTION BY
1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675

DRAWN BY JAG
EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. 80TH STREET 80TH STREET DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 (2016 SURVEY) 1000 1000 NW 1000 1000 NW 1000 REVIEWED BY CJB
TITLE
990 EXISTING LEGAL GRADE, TYP. 990 990 990 990 990
980 980 980 980 980 980

MAINLINE SECTIONS
996.46
998.2
996.9
997.8
997.6
998.8
997.8
998.3
998.8
999.2
999.7
999.9
998.6
997.2
997.4
970 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 970 970 1+00 2+00 3+00 970
SHEET
14 OF 15
BRANCH 1 - 16+00BRANCH 1 - 34+50 BRANCH 40+00
1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
990 990 990 990 990 990
1003.7
1000.4
997.0
980 1+00 980 980 1+00 980 980 1+00 980
BRANCH 2 - 3+50 BRANCH 2 - 8+80

1010 1010 1010 1010 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
EXISTING SURFACE ELEVATION, TYP. STATE OF MINNESOTA.
EXISTING SURFACE, TYP. CHARLES J. BRANDEL

1000 1000 1000 (2016 SURVEY) 1000
DATE LIC. NO. 43359

PERMANENT POND, TYP. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
990 990 990 LEGAL GRADE BELOW 990 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
POND ELEVATION, TYP. STATE OF MINNESOTA.
990.36
991.9
990.8
990.1
990.2
991.5
991.7
980 1+00 980 980 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 980
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT NO. 17-16-18675

CAD FILE NAME 18675 BR.1 & 2 SECTIONS
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
TITLE
BRANCH 1 & 2
SECTIONS
SHEET
15 OF 15
APPENDIX F:
HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOS
Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Re-Establishment of Records Appendix F

Appendix I:
E:WCA
WCAApplication
Application
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix E

Project Name and/or Number: 18675 Chippewa and Swift JCD 9
PART ONE: Applicant Information

If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the
applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s
contact information must also be provided.
Applicant/Landowner Name: Chippewa and Swift Joint County Drainage Authority (Michelle May)
Mailing Address: 629 North Eleventh Street, Montevideo MN 56265
Phone: 320-269-7447
E-mail Address: mmay@co.chippewa.mn.us
Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above):

Mailing Address:
Phone:
E-mail Address:
Agent Name: Chuck Brandel, ISG

Mailing Address: 115 E Hickory St #300, Mankato, MN 56001
Phone: 507-387-6651
E-mail Address: chuck.brandel@is-grp.com
PART TWO: Site Location Information

County: Chippewa City/Township: Kragero and Big Bend Townships
Parcel ID and/or Address:
Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Sections 11, 12, 13 (Kragero Township); Sections 18, 19, 29 (Big Bend
Township)
Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45.1365o N, -95.8743o W
Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways.
Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): ~22,500 feet
If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names
and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your
application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at:
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf
PART THREE: General Project/Site Information

If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other
correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number.
Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The
project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements
that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing
the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts.
Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch Number 9 (JCD 9) is a public drainage system which serves a watershed area of approximately
17,200 acres located in Big Bend and Kragero Townships in Chippewa County and Edison Township in Swift County. JCD 9 was
originally established in 1910 as a public drainage system with construction of the ditch commencing shortly after. The entire
mainline open ditch consists of approximately 36,000 feet beginning along 80th Street NW in Section 11 of Kragero Township and
terminating near the center of Section 33 of Big Bend Township. A location map is included in Attachment 1.
The mainline open ditch spans through the middle of low land which historically has consisted of many wetland complexes and open
pastures. The open ditch function is to convey perennial flows through the open channel while utilizing the adjacent low lands as
floodplains during larger flow periods. Since its establishment, minimal maintenance has occurred to the system other than beaver
dam removals, spot cleaning near roadways, and culvert replacements under roadways as necessary.
Over time, sediment accumulation, cattail growth, and migrating bogs in the open channel has caused significant flow restrictions
through the low lying areas along the open channel. In many cases, wetland boundaries have continued to expand laterally into
areas which historically have never contained wetland features or standing water. The flow restrictions have also permanently
inundated 80th Street NW and have caused other roadways to overtop in Swift County. Flooding has occurred throughout the
watershed due to the flow restrictions which has damaged private property and has changed the historic land use in areas from
farmland or grassland into wetlands.
The goal of the project is to restore the historic base flow through the JCD 9 ditch system by repairing the open channel. This is in
response to a petition for repair of JCD 9 which was filed in 2015 to restore the ditch back to legal ditch conditions. Repairs in this
project include open ditch cleaning, replacing culvert crossings, tile outlet replacements, and rip rap on tile outlets and culvert
crossings. The ditch repair would follow the existing channel alignment which lies directly in the middle of the wetland complexes
along JCD 9. This would clean the entire ditch to legal grade including areas through DNR public waters, Wildlife Management Areas
(WMA), and other areas that have developed wetland characteristics. Also included with the legal repair is replacing existing culverts
and placing them at the correct elevation along the legal grade line of the ditch.
An alternative repair option which included re-routing the ditch on the outside of the wetland boundaries with the same legal
channel conditions was prepared. The goal of this option was to minimize wetland impacts and make future cleanouts easier.
Although landowner support was high for this option, the alternative was dismissed after strong opposition from reviewing agencies.
The petition for repair called for cleaning the open ditch back to the legal conditions as constructed in 1910. This includes cleaning
a 3-foot wide bottom with 1:1 side slopes through the entire mainline, Branch 1, and Branch 2 open ditches to the legal ditch grade.
The legal ditch grade was identified utilizing design profiles from 1910 and soil borings along the channel which identified the
originally constructed channel bottom. A full description of the legal channel was completed under MN Statute 103.101 subd. 4 and
the Re-Establishment of Records Report is included in Attachment 5.
This repair project is not slated to repair the entire JCD 9 system to legal conditions due to potential impacts to public waters,
Wildlife Management Areas, wetlands, and downstream watercourses. The goal of the repair is to clean areas along the open ditch
that are high priority areas that cause significant flow restrictions and extensive flooding to the surrounding areas. The repair focuses
on areas that have accumulated sediment and cattail growth well above legal ditch grade which significantly restrict flow. Some
areas currently provide adequate conveyance of flow although they are not at legal ditch conditions and still have some flow
restrictions. The repair will begin in Section 29 of Big Bend Township near 120th Avenue NW and 50th Street NW, approximately
9,000 feet upstream of the legal ditch outlet. It will continue upstream through Section 19 of Big Bend Township up to a point near
the middle of Section 19 outside of the DNR Public Water Basin ID 12009400 (DNR Basin). The repair will not span through the DNR
Basin and will resume on the north side of State Highway 40 in Section 18 of Big Bend Township. The repair will continue through
Sections 13, 12, and 11 of Kragero Township where it will terminate at the beginning of the legal open ditch near the intersection of
80th Street NW and CSAH 10. A repair overview map is included in Attachment 1.
The repair will also include replacing culverts which are in poor condition, have back slope, or are above legal grade. An alternative
culvert replacement plan is preferred for this repair which includes keeping the same sized culverts and placing floodplain culverts
where multiple culverts at a single crossing exists. The alternative culvert plan also includes leaving existing culverts in place near
the DNR Basin, WMA areas, and downstream areas near the outlet of the system to limit impacts to these areas. The goal of the
alternative culvert plan is to limit increases in downstream peak flow rates by providing flood retention in upstream locations where
the majority of the cleaning will occur. The alternative culvert replacement plan is included in the preferred repair alternative.
The culvert replacements include culverts along the open ditch where it crosses 80th Street NW, 140th Avenue NW, 70th Street NW,
and 130th Avenue NW. Where multiple culverts exist through a single road crossing, one culvert will be placed at legal grade with
the others to be placed above legal grade. At 140th Avenue NW, two culverts will be placed at legal grade while the other two will
be placed above legal grade. The design of these dual culvert crossings is for one culvert to be set at legal grade to maintain perennial
conveyance through the road crossing while the others act as a floodplain culvert for larger rainfall events. Sedimentation in both
culverts will be reduced which will require less future maintenance. This will also maintain wetland hydrology similar to conditions
observed 25-years ago in these areas. Culverts will be replaced with the same size or next available size. The remaining culverts
downstream of 130th Avenue NW to the outlet of the open ditch are not slated to be replaced as they are in good condition and
have adequate capacity for the planned repairs. Preliminary construction plans are included in Attachment 3.
The timeline for construction of the project is immediate. Currently, flow has been severely restricted to the point where little flow
is observed under base flow conditions in areas to be repaired. Adjacent wetland complexes along the open ditch in Sections 2, 11,
12, and 13 of Kragero have significantly expanded laterally in recent years and continue to change adjacent land uses. Water has
permanently inundated 80th Street NW and routinely overtops other roadways in Swift County. This poses an immediate threat to
public safety and public access. Water levels in the past 2 years have been raised by more than 8-inches and have fully extended
beyond historic wetland areas, inundating areas across the landscape that have historically never been flooded. Public infrastructure
including public ditches, roadways, and culverts have also been damaged and no longer function to their designs. The anticipated
timeline for construction would be the spring/summer of 2019, given acceptance of the project by local, state and federal
authorities.
Attachment A-(Not Applicable)

Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or
Jurisdictional Determination
By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District
(Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply):
Wetland Type Confirmation
Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU
concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation
concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address
the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area
(including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.).
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication
from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of
computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all
waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be
appealed.
Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that
jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the
affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process.
In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for
Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013).
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx
Attachment B
Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss
Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation
Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland
replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either
exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCA jurisdiction.
Identify the specific exemption or no-loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies:
8420.0420 EXEMPTION STANDARDS. Subp. 3. Public drainage system. A replacement plan is not required for: (2) impacts
resulting from maintenance or repair of existing drainage systems other than public drainage systems, when the
maintenance or repair does not drain wetlands that have existed for more than 25 years before the proposed impact.
Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments
and exhibits that support your contention. Applicants should refer to rules (e.g. WCA rules), guidance documents (e.g. BWSR
guidance, Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions (e.g. Corps General Permit conditions) to determine the
necessary information to support the application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project
Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide:
The goal of the repair is to restore the perennial flow of the ditch system. Three hydrologic/hydraulic (H/H) models were
developed to analyze three scenarios of the JCD 9 system and the effects of the repair alternatives to the existing conditions and
conditions that existed 25-years ago. The first model titled “Existing Conditions” analyzes the existing conditions of the JCD 9
public ditch system and the lateral wetlands along the open channel. The second model titled “Legal Repair” represents the
repair conditions of the legal drainage system, which is not the preferred alternative. This scenario is modeled to compare the
legal repair conditions of the JCD 9 system. The last model titled “Repair Alternative” represents the preferred repair alternative
which does not clean the entire ditch system and incorporates floodplain culverts at selected upstream roadways. This is the
preferred alternative as it allows for the flow to be restored for the JCD 9 system while minimizing the overall impacts to the
adjacent wetlands, public waters, and downstream flow conditions.
A full 1D-2D XPSWMM hydrologic/hydraulic (H/H) model was prepared for the JCD 9 system for each scenario. XPSWMM is a
fully dynamic modeling software that combines 1-dimensional flow calculations (open channel, pipe flow, etc.) with 2-
dimensional (floodplain, overland flow, etc.) to better analyze difficult H/H conditions. The 1D aspect incorporates channel or
pipe geometry, roughness conditions, and other hydraulic components associated with 1D flow. The 2D model incorporates land
use, soil type, topography, hydraulic structures, and the associated 1D components to simulate overland and floodplain flow
associated with the triggered runoff from a watershed.
XPSWMM version 2017.2 was utilized for the model. Hydrology calculations were performed using the NRCS TR-55 method and
utilized runoff curve numbers generated from USDA web soil survey and USGS land use information across the entire JCD 9
watershed. Topographic data from the survey was utilized in the model and the XPTIN surface is on NAD 83 Chippewa County
coordinates. Design storms and rainfall data used to generate the NRCS 24-hour Type II rainfall distributions for the project area
were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates.
The 1D-2D H/H model was developed for the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year rainfall events and spans from the beginning of
the Branch 1 open ditch in Section 2 of Kragero Township to the outlet of the mainline in Section 33 of Big Bend Township.
The results of the model generate dynamic flow rates, peak water elevations, flood extents, and many other elements as a result
of the simulated rainfall event and the associated timing. The 2D model results simulate the overland or floodplain flow per cell
assigned in the 2D extent. Each 2D cell simulates flow, velocity, water depth, infiltration, and timing all with adjacent 2D cell
effects. This in effect simulates lateral effects of the open channel as well as across the floodplain of the modeled area.
It should be noted that the existing conditions model was developed based on the 2017 topographic survey. Conditions that
currently exist may be worse than the model shows due to increased blockages throughout the open channel and associated
flooding. Many areas currently are very restricted and do not show base flow and only respond to larger runoff events. As a
result, water levels that currently exist on site are more than 8 inches higher than the 2017 survey.
The three model scenarios will be compared and analyzed in the following sections. The goal of the analysis is to compare the
three scenarios and the impacts of the legal repair and preferred repair alternative. The results of the preferred repair alternative
fall between the existing conditions and legal repair in regards to drainage impacts to wetland, peak flow rates, drain time, and
peak water levels. This shows that the preferred alternative results in less impact when compared to what could be done under
the legal repair. The results from the models will be described from upstream to downstream along the JCD 9 system.
Historical aerials from 1993 were utilized to approximate the wetland boundaries that existed 25-years ago throughout the JCD
9 system as compared to wetland boundaries generated from the 2017 aerial. The wetland boundaries are referenced in several
images in this section and are indicated in yellow for the 1993 wetland boundary and red for the 2017 wetland boundary.
Historical aerial wetland maps of these conditions are included in Attachment 2.
To compare hydrology and impacts to the wetlands under each modeled scenario, the wetland boundaries from 1993 and 2017
were imported into XPSWMM and the max flood extents from the 2D model were shown. The purpose behind showing the flood
extents and the wetland boundaries is to show the accuracy of the existing conditions model and how it aligns with the wetland
conditions observed in 2017. The anticipated wetland conditions would be triggered between the 2-year and 5-year rainfall
frequencies as they are the most frequent occurring events. The 2-year frequency is expected to provide hydrology to the
majority of the wetland area while the 5-year rainfall frequency would be expected to fully cover the wetland boundary and
expand laterally beyond the boundary in some areas.
The flood extents also show the lateral effects of the repair project when comparing it to the existing conditions. The max flood
extents under the repair scenarios are expected to be less than the existing conditions as flow conditions are better. In addition,
the 1993 wetland boundary is overlaid to show that the repairs will not affect the wetlands more than what existed 25-years
ago.
Figures 1 and 2 show the flood extents of the 2- and 5-year rainfall frequency of the existing model along 80th Street NW. As
shown, the water level under the existing conditions model fully covers the 1993 wetland boundary under the 2-year rainfall
frequency which provides hydrology to the historic wetlands of 25-years ago. The flood extents of the 2-year frequency also
cover the majority of the 2017 wetland boundary which represents the conditions of the JCD 9 system today. Under the 5-year
frequency, all of the 2017 boundary and beyond is covered by the flood extents further validating the model.
Figure 1: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Section 11 of Kragero Township along 80th Street NW
Figure 2: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 5-Year Frequency in Section 11 of Kragero Township along 80th Street NW
Under the legal repair and repair alternative conditions models, similar conditions occur in regards to flood extents along the
wetland boundaries. Flood extents under the 2-year frequency nearly covers the entire 1993 wetland boundary in both scenarios.
Under the 5-year frequency, both repair scenarios cover the entire 2017 wetland boundary, however the water depth is slightly
higher in the repair alternatives model. This is due to the incorporation of the floodplain culverts to reduce peak flow rates and
provide more upland storage upstream of 140th Avenue NW. Figures 3 and 4 show the flood extents for the 2-year frequency of
the legal repair and repair alternative while Figures 5 and 6 show the flood extents under the 5-year frequency for the same
scenarios respectively.
Figure 3: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Section 11 of Kragero Township along 80th Street NW
Figure 4: Repair Alternative Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Section 11 of Kragero Township along 80th Street NW
Figure 5: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 5-Year Frequency in Section 11 of Kragero Township along 80th Street NW
Figure 6: Repair Alternative Conditions Flood Extents of 5-Year Frequency in Section 11 of Kragero Township along 80th Street NW
Both the legal repair and repair alternative models shows peak water elevations lower than the existing conditions for locations
upstream of 80th Street NW and 140th Avenue NW. Under the repair alternative scenario, peak elevations are higher than the
legal repair scenario due to the floodplain culverts. Under the 5, 10, and 25-year frequencies; notable increases in peak water
occur in this area due to the storage provided upstream of 140th Avenue NW. Under the 50 and 100-year only a slight decrease
is noticed due to the roadway overtopping in both repair scenarios. Table 1 below summarizes the peak water surface elevations
for these locations for all three modeled scenarios.
Table 1: Peak Water Elevations Comparisons in Section 2 and 11 of Kragero Township
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
140th Avenue NW 997.64 997.06 997.09 -0.58 0.04 998.66 997.77 998.00 -0.88 0.23 999.40 998.34 998.71 -1.06 0.38
80th Street NW 998.75 998.36 998.39 -0.39 0.03 999.56 999.20 999.23 -0.37 0.04 1000.01 999.67 999.70 -0.35 0.03
Denotes peak elevation less
than or equal to existing
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
140th Avenue NW 1000.66 999.95 1000.49 -0.70 0.54 1000.76 1000.51 1000.63 -0.25 0.12 1000.85 1000.69 1000.76 -0.16 0.07
80th Street NW 1000.82 1000.58 1000.78 -0.24 0.20 1001.29 1000.96 1001.04 -0.34 0.08 1001.48 1001.18 1001.26 -0.29 0.08
Peak flow rates through 80th Street NW and 140th Avenue NW increase under both repair scenarios due to the increase in capacity
of the open channel and culverts. Under the existing conditions, significant flow restrictions as a result of sediment and cattails
exist which will trigger an increase in peak flow with any repair work. Peak flow rates are nearly the same for both repair
alternatives as the majority of the flow is conveyed through the open channel with limited restrictions from the culverts. Less of
a peak flow increase is observed under the repair alternative in the 5, 10, and 25-year events as the floodplain culverts provide
storage at those levels to reduce peak flow rates. Under the 50 and 100-year events, the roadways are overtopped and limited
differences are observed. Table 2 below summarizes the peak flow rates through the 80th Street NW and 140th Avenue NW road
crossings.
Table 2: Peak Flow Rates through 80th Street NW and 140th Avenue NW
Culvert#1 8.21 18.91 28.08 130% 49% 30.36 52.20 75.19 72% 44% 49.51 77.02 105.36 56% 37%
Culvert#2 22.94 18.91 28.08 -18% 49% 49.71 52.20 75.19 5% 44% 64.88 77.02 105.36 19% 37%
Culvert#3 22.67 18.91 9.69 -17% -49% 46.59 52.20 25.44 12% -51% 60.44 77.02 35.79 27% -54%
140th Avenue NW
Culvert#4 14.07 18.91 9.69 34% -49% 37.54 52.20 25.44 39% -51% 53.27 77.02 35.79 45% -54%
Total 67.88 75.63 75.54 11% 0% 164.20 208.79 201.25 27% -4% 228.09 308.07 282.31 35% -8%
Culvert#1 18.12 24.50 29.20 35% 19% 34.57 56.00 63.95 62% 14% 40.06 70.14 73.41 75% 5%
Culvert#2 18.16 24.50 18.53 35% -24% 32.37 56.00 46.79 73% -16% 37.07 70.14 67.29 89% -4%
80th Street NW
Total 36.28 49.00 47.73 35% -3% 66.94 112.00 110.74 67% -1% 77.14 140.29 140.70 82% 0%
Open Channel 61.87 61.96 61.96 0% 0% 180.46 182.41 182.42 1% 0% 279.84 283.79 283.78 1% 0%
Middle Branch 1 Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 2.13 0.00 0.00 -100% N/A
Total 61.87 61.96 61.96 0% 0% 180.46 182.41 182.42 1% 0% 281.96 283.79 283.78 1% 0%
Open Channel 50.67 50.59 50.59 0% 0% 149.93 150.23 150.23 0% 0% 235.29 235.21 235.21 0% 0%
Total 50.67 50.59 50.59 0% 0% 149.93 150.23 150.23 0% 0% 235.29 235.21 235.21 0% 0%
equal to existing
Culvert#1 72.42 132.55 159.06 83% 20% 74.21 145.87 163.82 97% 12% 75.65 151.45 165.52 100% 9%
Culvert#2 82.94 132.55 159.06 60% 20% 83.29 145.87 163.82 75% 12% 83.60 151.45 165.52 81% 9%
Culvert#3 81.19 132.55 54.11 63% -59% 81.88 145.87 55.74 78% -62% 82.33 151.45 56.31 84% -63%
140th Avenue NW
Culvert#4 74.18 132.55 54.11 79% -59% 75.94 145.87 55.74 92% -62% 77.24 151.45 56.31 96% -63%
Overflow 163.05 3.37 68.33 -98% 1926% 242.03 86.05 153.28 -64% 78% 319.41 186.51 248.47 -42% 33%
Total 473.78 533.58 494.67 13% -7% 557.35 669.55 592.38 20% -12% 638.24 792.31 692.13 24% -13%
Culvert#1 45.35 87.16 85.08 92% -2% 44.27 86.24 84.67 95% -2% 43.84 83.72 82.76 91% -1%
Culvert#2 44.41 87.16 87.12 96% 0% 43.28 86.24 86.15 99% 0% 42.89 83.72 84.60 95% 1%
80th Street NW
Overflow 164.58 103.20 107.95 -37% 5% 203.68 136.03 138.45 -33% 2% 237.25 165.01 167.37 -30% 1%
Total 254.33 277.51 280.15 9% 1% 291.24 308.50 309.27 6% 0% 323.98 332.45 334.72 3% 1%
Culvert 477.15 507.65 507.85 6% 0% 545.69 577.26 577.54 6% 0% 651.44 697.38 697.72 7% 0%
Middle Branch 1 Overflow 45.32 37.26 37.29 -18% 0% 84.49 50.75 50.59 -40% 0% 126.48 80.95 80.19 -36% -1%
Total 522.47 544.91 545.13 4% 0% 630.19 628.01 628.13 0% 0% 777.91 778.33 777.90 0% 0%
Culvert 431.37 451.93 451.92 5% 0% 469.04 487.12 487.14 4% 0% 491.07 509.64 509.61 4% 0%
Total 431.37 451.93 451.92 5% 0% 469.04 487.12 487.14 4% 0% 491.07 509.64 509.61 4% 0%
equal to existing
Peak water elevations through Section 12 of Kragero Township are similar for the existing and both repair conditions models.
This is mainly due to the flat linear wetland complexes and shallow open ditch through the section. The wetland complexes
through this stretch act as the floodplain adjacent to the main channel and are frequently inundated with water under lesser
rainfall frequencies. The 2-year flood extents under the existing conditions cover all of the 1993 wetland boundary and nearly all
of the 2017 boundary. Under the 5-year event, the existing conditions model extends well beyond the 2017 boundary. Figures
7 and 8 below show the flood extents of the existing conditions model for the 2 and 5-year rainfall frequencies.
Figure 7: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Section 12 of Kragero Township
The flood extents under both the legal repair and repair alternative scenarios are similar to the existing conditions due to the flat
topography through this section. The peak water levels are lower than existing under both scenarios, however the repair
alternative has higher water levels than the legal repair. This is due to only lowering one culvert at 70th Street and keeping the
second culvert in place to act as a floodplain culvert. Table 3 compares the peak flow elevations in Section 12 for all three
modeled scenarios. Figures 9 and 10 show the flood extents for the 2 and 5-year frequency under the legal repair conditions
while Figures 11 and 12 show the flood extents under the repair alternative conditions. As shown, both repair options show
hydrology well beyond the 1993 wetland boundary.
Table 3: Peak Water Elevations at 70th Street NW
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
70th Street NW 995.90 995.67 995.69 -0.24 0.02 996.83 996.53 996.65 -0.30 0.12 997.36 996.94 997.14 -0.42 0.19

Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
70th Street NW 998.81 998.10 998.27 -0.71 0.17 999.45 998.60 998.76 -0.84 0.16 999.62 999.12 999.20 -0.49 0.08
Figure 9: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Section 12 of Kragero Township
Figure 11: Repair Alternative Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Section 12 of Kragero Township
Peak flow rates are increased through 70th Street NW under both repair scenarios. Under the 2-year frequency, the peak flow
rates are nearly the same because the culverts do not restrict the flow as the channel provides additional capacity to carry the
increase in peak flow. For all rainfall frequencies above the 2-year, the repair alternative scenario has less of an increase in peak
flow as 70th Street provides a restriction with the floodplain culvert. Table 4 below summarizes the peak flow rates through 70th
Street NW.
Table 4: Existing and Repair Conditions Peak Flow Rates at 70th Street NW
Culvert#1 33.68 26.60 48.01 -21% 81% 78.45 86.91 132.00 11% 52% 99.54 127.34 171.04 28% 34%
Culvert#2 13.19 26.59 5.13 102% -81% 42.91 86.90 31.74 103% -63% 63.17 127.32 54.39 102% -57%
70th Street NW
Total 46.87 53.19 53.14 13% 0% 121.36 173.81 163.74 43% -6% 162.70 254.66 225.42 57% -11%
Open Channel 5.86 29.61 29.61 406% 0% 12.45 55.75 52.76 348% -5% 15.59 76.26 67.38 389% -12%
Middle Section 12-Kragero Overflow 57.28 45.27 45.20 -21% 0% 142.30 148.07 141.62 4% -4% 190.63 223.08 199.82 17% -10%
Total 63.13 74.88 74.81 19% 0% 154.74 203.82 194.38 32% -5% 206.22 299.34 267.20 45% -11%
equal to existing

Culvert#1 149.16 213.48 256.78 43% 20% 160.04 239.53 279.93 50% 17% 152.02 259.38 292.16 71% 13%
Culvert#2 122.95 213.45 101.78 74% -52% 145.32 239.50 120.79 65% -50% 147.72 259.35 139.78 76% -46%
70th Street NW
Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 67.65 0.00 0.00 -100% N/A 244.19 0.00 0.00 -100% N/A
Total 272.11 426.93 358.57 57% -16% 373.00 479.02 400.72 28% -16% 543.94 518.73 431.94 -5% -17%
Culvert 26.81 109.72 94.22 309% -14% 33.68 121.69 110.38 261% -9% 44.61 131.46 132.97 195% 1%
Middle Section 12-Kragero Overflow 374.14 386.79 336.27 3% -13% 509.76 462.95 393.10 -9% -15% 794.17 548.62 512.77 -31% -7%
Total 400.96 496.51 430.50 24% -13% 543.44 584.64 503.48 8% -14% 838.78 680.08 645.74 -19% -5%
equal to existing
Through Section 13 of Kragero Township upstream of 130th Avenue NW, the peak elevations and flood extents for all three
scenarios are nearly the same under the 2-, 5-, and 10-year frequencies. While more flow is allowed with the cleaning of the
channel, peak elevations are similar due to the repair of the 130th Avenue NW culvert. The culvert at 130th Avenue NW will be
raised with both repair scenarios as it is below legal grade which maintains similar flood extents for lesser rainfall frequencies.
Under the larger rainfall frequencies, the peak water elevations are lowered under the legal repair scenario as the water no
longer overtops the roadway.
The effects of the floodplain culverts and upstream storage in the repair alternative scenario begin to be noticed at 130th Avenue
NW under the 5-year and greater frequencies. The additional storage decreases the peak flow rates, draws out the timing of
flow, and as a result lower peak flow elevations are observed downstream. This offsets the impacts downstream from an increase
in flooding and reduces the overall flooding from existing conditions at this point and points downstream. Table 5 below
summarizes the peak water elevations at 130th Avenue. Figures 13-18 show the flood extent maps for all three scenarios under
the 2- and 5-year frequencies.
Table 5: Peak Water Elevations at 130th Street NW
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
130th Avenue NW 994.26 994.28 994.27 0.02 -0.02 995.07 995.09 994.98 0.02 -0.11 995.57 995.60 995.40 0.02 -0.20
Middle Section 13-Kragero 995.17 994.93 994.92 -0.24 0.00 995.67 995.70 995.69 0.03 -0.01 995.93 996.07 995.94 0.14 -0.13
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
130th Avenue NW 996.96 996.69 996.31 -0.27 -0.38 997.80 997.20 996.84 -0.60 -0.36 998.45 997.58 997.44 -0.87 -0.14
Middle Section 13-Kragero 997.02 996.88 996.55 -0.14 -0.33 997.85 997.32 996.98 -0.52 -0.34 998.51 997.68 997.53 -0.82 -0.16
Similar to upstream areas of JCD 9, peak flow increases are observed under the 2-year frequency for both repair alternatives due
to the open channel cleaning. There is also a larger increase in peak flow at this crossing with the repair as the existing culvert is
damaged and has partially filled in with sediment. The repair alternative has lower peak flow rates than the legal repair for rainfall
frequencies of 5-year and larger. This is solely due to the floodplain culverts provided upstream as there is only one culvert
crossing at 130th Avenue NW. Table 6 below summarizes the peak flow rates at the 130th Avenue NW culvert crossing.
Table 6: Existing and Repair Conditions Peak Flow Rates at 130th Avenue NW
Culvert 48.04 75.35 75.36 57% 0% 115.13 166.49 155.81 45% -6% 150.98 243.26 216.70 61% -11%
130th Avenue NW Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A
Total 48.04 75.35 75.36 57% 0% 115.13 166.49 155.81 45% -6% 150.98 243.26 216.70 61% -11%
Open Channel 16.35 45.37 45.33 177% 0% 33.06 71.01 68.44 115% -4% 39.11 87.96 82.80 125% -6%
Middle Section 13-Kragero Overflow 34.00 9.37 9.16 -72% -2% 106.96 124.15 112.89 16% -9% 152.49 201.87 172.60 32% -14%
Total 50.36 54.73 54.50 9% 0% 140.02 195.16 181.33 39% -7% 191.59 289.83 255.40 51% -12%
equal to existing

Culvert 245.41 413.88 361.23 69% -13% 272.18 482.87 413.33 77% -14% 271.43 520.46 460.00 92% -12%
130th Avenue NW Overflow 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A 132.09 0.00 0.00 -100% N/A 588.69 94.01 13.83 -84% -85%
Total 245.41 413.88 361.23 69% -13% 404.28 482.87 413.33 19% -14% 860.11 614.47 473.83 -29% -23%
Culvert 34.66 92.40 99.29 167% 7% 40.95 91.52 97.53 124% 7% 41.57 92.99 96.93 124% 4%
Middle Section 13-Kragero Overflow 247.83 368.36 309.90 49% -16% 376.97 424.79 355.84 13% -16% 602.00 461.64 385.66 -23% -16%
Total 282.49 460.77 409.18 63% -11% 417.92 516.31 453.38 24% -12% 643.57 554.63 482.59 -14% -13%
equal to existing
Peak water elevations from 130th Avenue NW through the DNR Basin slightly increase under the legal repair conditions on all
rainfall frequencies. This is due to the increase in drainage from the upstream legal repairs of JCD 9 and with the DNR
impoundment. However, under the repair alternatives conditions, these increases in peak water elevation and flood extents are
limited and nearly match the existing conditions. The upstream storage provided by the floodplain culverts limit the increase in
peak flow and timing to the DNR Basin area and thus nearly matches the existing conditions. Table 7 below summarizes the peak
elevations through the DNR Basin area.
Table 7: Peak Water Elevations at 60th Street NW and DNR Basin
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
Downstream DNR Basin 993.91 993.93 993.86 0.02 -0.07 994.50 994.52 994.48 0.02 -0.04 994.80 994.89 994.82 0.09 -0.07
60th Street NW (HWY 40) 994.14 994.19 994.18 0.06 -0.02 994.66 994.73 994.63 0.07 -0.10 994.99 995.12 994.95 0.13 -0.17

Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
Downstream DNR Basin 995.39 995.57 995.48 0.18 -0.09 995.69 995.87 995.81 0.18 -0.06 996.09 996.11 996.13 0.02 0.02
60th Street NW (HWY 40) 995.97 995.88 995.75 -0.10 -0.13 996.58 996.30 996.16 -0.28 -0.13 997.95 996.77 996.67 -1.18 -0.10
The flood extents for all three scenarios are nearly the same from 130th Street through the DNR basin under the 2 and 5-year
frequencies. The 2-year extents covers almost all of the 2017 wetland boundary and the 5-year covers and extends beyond. This
shows that under both repair scenarios, the wetland hydrology will be provided beyond the historic 25-year wetland boundary.
Figures 19-24 show the flood extent maps for all three scenarios under the 2 and 5-year rainfall frequencies.
Figure 19: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 18 and 19 of Big Bend Township
Figure 20: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 5-Year Frequency in Sections 18 and 19 of Big Bend Township
Figure 21: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 18 and 19 of Big Bend Township
Figure 22: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 5-Year Frequency in Sections 18 and 19 of Big Bend Township
Figure 23: Repair Alternatives Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 18 and 19 of Big Bend Township
Figure 24: Repair Alternatives Conditions Flood Extents of 5-Year Frequency in Sections 18 and 19 of Big Bend Township
Peak flow rates from 60th Street NW through the DNR Basin increase under both the legal repair and repair alternative scenarios.
Under the 2-year frequency, the flow rates for both repair scenarios are nearly the same due to the conditions of the repaired
channel. Under rainfall frequencies above the 2-year, the repair alternative peak flow rates are less than the legal from the
upstream flood control provided by the floodplain culverts. Table 8 summarizes the peak flow rates at 60th Street NW for all
scenarios.
Table 8: Peak Flow Rates at 60th Street NW and DNR Basin
Open Channel 17.06 59.74 59.97 250% 0% 26.65 98.78 98.51 271% 0% 29.36 112.42 109.95 283% -2%
Downstream DNR Basin Overflow 114.03 100.64 101.38 -12% 1% 268.82 258.10 252.90 -4% -2% 337.16 351.93 334.07 4% -5%
Total 131.09 160.37 161.35 22% 1% 295.47 356.88 351.41 21% -2% 366.53 464.35 444.02 27% -4%
Culvert 96.54 120.88 121.04 25% 0% 242.32 274.13 269.49 13% -2% 330.64 385.75 368.45 17% -4%
Total 96.54 120.88 121.04 25% 0% 242.32 274.13 269.49 13% -2% 330.64 385.75 368.45 17% -4%
equal to existing

Open Channel 33.82 129.33 128.28 282% -1% 37.98 141.63 137.25 273% -3% 48.17 149.08 158.38 210% 6%
Downstream DNR Basin Overflow 512.15 593.46 552.34 16% -7% 657.98 751.29 713.16 14% -5% 983.19 839.54 937.89 -15% 12%
Total 545.98 722.79 680.62 32% -6% 695.96 892.92 850.41 28% -5% 1031.35 988.63 1096.27 -4% 11%
Culvert 556.51 675.97 661.87 21% -2% 674.01 865.84 833.11 28% -4% 957.67 977.44 1056.49 2% 8%
Total 556.51 675.97 661.87 21% -2% 674.01 865.84 833.11 28% -4% 957.67 977.44 1056.49 2% 8%
equal to existing
The results of peak water elevations are similar to those in upstream areas for both repair scenarios in areas downstream of the
DNR Basin to the DNR Wildlife Management Areas (WMA). Under the 2-year frequency, peak elevations are nearly the same for
both repair scenarios and for greater frequencies the repair alternative has lower peak water elevations. Under the 100-year
frequency, the repair alternative slightly increases peak water elevations. This is due to the difference in culvert conditions for
the repair scenarios. Under the legal repair scenario, the culverts are raised up to legal grade while the repair alternative keeps
the existing culverts in place below legal grade. As a result under the 100-year event, the repair alternative scenario fully uses
the culvert capacity and creates head pressure which maximizes the capacity of the culvert. Under the legal repair conditions,
the culverts are not filled to the top and thus do not use the full capacity. The results are a slight increase in peak flow and peak
elevation at the road crossings from the DNR Basin downstream under the 100-year frequency. Table 9 below summarizes the
peak water elevations from the 120th Avenue NW to 110th Avenue NW.
Table 9: Peak Water Elevations through Sections 19, 20, and 29 of Big Bend Township
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
110th Avenue NW 991.06 991.17 991.18 0.11 0.01 991.45 991.61 991.55 0.16 -0.06 991.69 991.92 991.81 0.23 -0.11
Upstream WMA Areas 991.98 991.99 992.00 0.01 0.01 992.39 992.41 992.41 0.02 0.00 992.59 992.66 992.64 0.06 -0.02
120th Avenue NW 992.90 992.92 992.86 0.02 -0.06 993.84 993.90 993.85 0.06 -0.05 994.26 994.39 994.31 0.13 -0.07

Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
110th Avenue NW 992.39 992.81 992.61 0.43 -0.20 992.86 993.31 993.14 0.45 -0.17 993.42 993.66 993.72 0.24 0.06
Upstream WMA Areas 993.14 993.37 993.28 0.23 -0.10 993.51 993.81 993.71 0.29 -0.10 993.98 994.11 994.21 0.14 0.09
120th Avenue NW 995.07 995.22 995.15 0.16 -0.08 995.39 995.54 995.50 0.15 -0.05 995.75 995.78 995.82 0.03 0.04
The flood extents for all three scenarios fully covers the 2017 wetland boundary under the 2-year frequency. This is due to the
hydrology provided from the watershed to this point and from the created WMA areas which maintain wetland water levels.
Therefore the wetlands which existed 25-years ago will have the same hydrology under the repair conditions. Figures 25-27 show
the flood extents of all three scenarios under the 2-year rainfall frequency in Section 19, 20, and 29 of Big Bend Township.
Figure 25: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 19, 20, and 29 of Big Bend Township
Figure 26: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 19, 20, and 29 of Big Bend Township
Figure 27: Repair Alternative Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 19, 20, and 29 of Big Bend Township
Peak flow rates through Section 19, 20, and 29 of Big Bend Township are similar to those in upstream locations as the flows are
nearly the same for both repair scenarios under the 2-year frequency and are slightly reduced for the larger events under the
repair alternative scenario. Again, the 100-year peak flows are slightly higher in the repair alternative due to the difference in
capacities of the culverts at road crossings. Table 10 summarizes the peak flow rates from 120th Avenue NW to 110th Avenue NW
through the WMA areas.
Table 10: Peak Flow Rates 120th Avenue NW to 110th Avenue NW
Culvert 56.89 80.57 81.29 42% 1% 213.79 254.60 253.10 19% -1% 319.51 368.23 366.14 15% -1%
Total 56.89 80.57 81.29 42% 1% 213.79 254.60 253.10 19% -1% 319.51 368.23 366.14 15% -1%
Open Channel 36.48 64.41 65.40 77% 2% 96.44 140.14 140.57 45% 0% 123.08 177.40 175.71 44% -1%
Upstream WMA Areas Overflow 44.75 48.73 50.42 9% 3% 192.36 192.07 192.56 0% 0% 287.70 292.82 287.00 2% -2%
Total 81.23 113.14 115.83 39% 2% 288.80 332.21 333.13 15% 0% 410.78 470.22 462.71 14% -2%
Culvert#1 28.30 43.18 43.04 53% 0% 94.05 121.45 119.75 29% -1% 133.07 170.73 166.49 28% -2%
Culvert#2 29.78 43.18 44.08 45% 2% 94.32 121.45 120.08 29% -1% 132.90 170.73 166.75 28% -2%
120th Avenue NW
Total 58.09 86.37 87.12 49% 1% 188.37 242.91 239.83 29% -1% 265.97 341.47 333.24 28% -2%
equal to existing
Culvert 628.30 747.83 732.40 19% -2% 850.22 1002.05 981.07 18% -2% 1104.00 1194.92 1286.41 8% 8%
Total 628.30 747.83 732.40 19% -2% 850.22 1002.05 981.07 18% -2% 1104.00 1194.92 1286.41 8% 8%
Open Channel 197.92 284.76 279.27 44% -2% 247.33 342.08 340.69 38% 0% 286.57 371.74 395.19 30% 6%
Upstream WMA Areas Overflow 577.35 626.98 601.61 9% -4% 786.12 855.05 828.04 9% -3% 1039.73 1016.78 1115.46 -2% 10%
Total 775.27 911.74 880.88 18% -3% 1033.45 1197.13 1168.72 16% -2% 1326.30 1388.52 1510.65 5% 9%
Culvert 203.40 245.62 245.66 21% 0% 225.80 259.73 260.29 15% 0% 261.15 244.21 253.33 -6% 4%
Culvert 203.85 245.62 246.08 20% 0% 226.08 259.73 260.36 15% 0% 260.64 244.21 253.47 -6% 4%
120th Avenue NW
Overflow 47.81 111.02 76.17 132% -31% 218.12 251.23 251.23 15% 0% 434.47 491.62 491.62 13% 0%
Total 455.06 602.26 567.90 32% -6% 669.99 770.69 771.88 15% 0% 956.25 980.03 998.41 2% 2%
equal to existing
From 40th Street NW to the ditch outlet, conditions from the modeled scenarios are similar and as expected to the conditions
upstream to the DNR Basin. The repair alternative has slightly higher peak water elevations and peak flow rates than the legal
conditions under the 2- and 100-year frequencies but reductions on all other modeled frequencies. The flood extents under the
2-year event for all scenarios are nearly the same and cover nearly all of the 2017 wetland boundary which will also provide
hydrology to the wetland that existed 25-years ago. Table 11 summarizes the peak water elevations from 40th Street to the outlet
of the system while Table 12 shows the peak flow rates for the same locations. Figures 28-30 show the max flood extents for all
three scenarios under the 2-year event which show similar hydrology provided to the wetland areas in each scenario.
Table 11: Peak Water Elevations at the JCD 9 Outlet
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
Ditch Outlet 989.50 989.65 989.66 0.15 0.01 990.10 990.21 990.19 0.11 -0.02 990.36 990.46 990.42 0.10 -0.04
40th Street NW 990.11 990.29 990.29 0.18 0.00 990.81 991.06 990.95 0.25 -0.11 991.11 991.44 991.24 0.32 -0.19
Legal Legal Legal
(MSL) (MSL) (MSL)
Ditch Outlet 990.94 991.10 991.09 0.17 -0.02 991.25 991.42 991.40 0.17 -0.02 991.55 991.64 991.65 0.08 0.01
40th Street NW 991.79 992.18 991.98 0.38 -0.20 992.18 992.54 992.38 0.36 -0.16 992.58 992.79 992.79 0.21 0.01
Table 12: Peak Flow Rates at the JCD 9 Outlet

Open Channel 34.40 43.26 44.21 26% 2% 104.89 111.16 111.70 6% 0% 144.19 145.13 147.16 1% 1%
Ditch Outlet Overflow 49.31 72.61 73.17 47% 1% 203.92 246.30 244.30 21% -1% 312.86 358.69 354.10 15% -1%
Total 83.71 115.86 117.38 38% 1% 308.81 357.45 356.00 16% 0% 457.05 503.82 501.26 10% -1%
Culvert 58.19 79.83 80.25 37% 1% 210.47 253.25 255.27 20% 1% 316.69 360.25 362.60 14% 1%
Total 58.19 79.83 80.25 37% 1% 210.47 253.25 255.27 20% 1% 316.69 360.25 362.60 14% 1%
equal to existing

Culvert 224.76 254.17 251.37 13% -1% 271.62 307.60 304.69 13% -1% 325.93 342.53 355.16 5% 4%
Ditch Outlet Overflow 625.22 740.50 727.30 18% -2% 850.49 1000.71 982.91 18% -2% 1124.28 1207.27 1293.89 7% 7%
Total 849.99 994.67 978.67 17% -2% 1122.11 1308.31 1287.61 17% -2% 1450.21 1549.80 1649.05 7% 6%
Culvert 578.83 611.59 648.73 6% 6% 713.40 726.22 778.25 2% 7% 835.44 799.97 890.17 -4% 11%
Total 578.83 611.59 648.73 6% 6% 713.40 726.22 778.25 2% 7% 835.44 799.97 890.17 -4% 11%
equal to existing
Figure 28: Existing Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 29, 28, and 33 of Big Bend Township
Figure 29: Legal Repair Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 29, 28, and 33 of Big Bend Township
Figure 30: Repair Alternative Conditions Flood Extents of 2-Year Frequency in Sections 29, 28, and 33 of Big Bend Township
Repairs to JCD 9 allow for more flow through the entire system as the major flow restrictions of sediment accumulation, excessive
cattail growth, and deteriorating culverts are repaired. Any repair work (including minor spot repairs) done to the JCD 9 system
will increase drainage as significant restrictions exist which are attributed to the poor existing conditions of the open ditch and
culvert crossings.
Under the legal JCD 9 drainage system, a full repair is allowed which would clean the entire open ditch mainline and branches,
remove and replace existing damaged culverts at legal ditch grade, and fix and armor tile outlets and other hydraulic structures.
The preferred alternative for repair of the JCD 9 system does not include all the legal repairs that are allowed to the system. The
repair alternative was designed to restore the historic and legal channel flow in the majority of the areas that are significantly
restricted while not repairing other areas that currently have adequate capacity, affect DNR Public water areas, and other WMA
and wildlife habitat areas. Also included in the repair alternative are floodplain culverts to limit the amount of impacts that would
occur under a legal repair. The floodplain culverts provide temporary storage in upstream areas of the system where the major
repairs are slated. This reduces the peak flow rates downstream, prolongs the drawdown of flow which results in less flooding
downstream and lowered peak flows downstream, and also provides additional hydrology to the wetland and floodplain areas
that would otherwise be drained with legal repairs. Downstream culverts are also not slated for replacement to avoid major
impacts to DNR and WMA areas and to keep existing drainage conditions near the outlet of the system. The preferred repair
alternative incorporates designs that address concerns from local, state, and federal reviewing agencies while still providing
drainage relief to the legal JCD 9 drainage system.
The open ditch repairs of the preferred alternative planned in this project still support wetland hydrology to the adjacent wetland
complexes as shown on the flood extents maps. Hydrology is provided to the entire 1993 wetland boundary extents under the
repair alternative and in most cases even provides similar hydrology that is observed under the 2017 conditions due to the nature
of the repair and an effort to limit wetland impacts. Repairs under the legal conditions of JCD 9 would have more impacts to the
adjacent wetlands as more drawdown of the ditch would occur. The preferred alternative repairs are the recommendation by
the engineer to restore flow through the JCD 9 watershed while minimizing impacts to adjacent wetland and downstream waters.
Attachment C
Avoidance and Minimization
Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a
description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management,
and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings,
roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management
plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary:
The goal of the project is to restore the historic base flow through the JCD 9 ditch system by repairing the open channel. This is
in response to a petition for repair of JCD 9 which was filed in 2015 to restore the ditch back to legal ditch conditions. Repairs
in this project include open ditch cleaning, replacing culvert crossings, tile outlet replacements, and rip rap on tile outlets and
culvert crossings. The ditch repair would follow the existing channel alignment which lies directly in the middle of the wetland
complexes along JCD 9. The preferred repair alternative does not repair the entire JCD 9 to legal conditions and incorporates
floodplain culverts to limit the impacts to the wetlands, public watercourses, WMA areas, and downstream waters.
Given the nature of the repair and the wetland areas in which the open ditch lies, special methods of construction will need to
occur. This includes utilizing construction mats for access purposes along the open channel for open ditch repairs. The
construction mats will be placed in phases to minimize impacts to wetland features for long durations of time. Once repairs are
completed in the identified areas, the construction mats will be removed and placed in the next phased location.
Spoils from the wetland areas from open ditch cleaning will be removed from the wetland area in an effort to not fill wetland
areas. These spoils will be hauled out of the wetlands and placed in select upland locations near the open ditch on agricultural
land. The locations were selected based on accessibility from the phased construction areas, soil types, and landowner input.
Locations of spoils and construction mat phasing are shown on Sheets 8 and 9 of Attachment 3.
During construction, temporary ditch flow restrictions will be placed along adjacent open channels, culvert crossings, and any
other structures that convey flow into the open channel. These restrictions will be placed and removed during construction in
the identified phased areas. The flow restrictions are in an effort to temporarily hold back water to make conditions more
favorable during construction.
Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist.
Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives
that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or
not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged
to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis:
Avoidance of impacts to aquatic resources is not a feasible option given the alignment of the legal ditch channel. One alternative
was researched and included re-routing the channel around the wetland. This was considered a feasible alternative and would
avoid impacting aquatic resources; however this option was not favored nor recommended by reviewing agencies due to
potential negative impacts on the existing wetlands and other water resources.
Another alternative of spot cleaning was investigated to remove areas with accumulated sediment above legal grade that
restrict flow to the JCD 9 system. However this alternative would leave 1-2 feet of sediment in areas along the open channel
which would still significantly restrict flow. The hydraulic analysis for this alternative showed only a slight increase in flow and
minimum reduction of flooding in areas in the upper portions of JCD 9. This option was dismiss based on these findings and
potential of repetitive spot cleaning maintenance year after year as high spots would continue to change along the open
channel. This would also increase the amount of impacts during construction to the wetlands as routine access would be
required year after year through long stretches of wetlands.
Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest
extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water
resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4):
The repair outlined above and in the preliminary construction plans does not repair the entire JCD 9 open ditch to its legal
conditions. The repairs are only in areas where substantial flow restrictions occur, where there are threats to public safety and
access, and avoids areas that are currently not in need of repair. This includes the DNR Basin ID 12009400, WMA areas, and
areas near the outlet. If the ditch was repaired to legal ditch conditions, more impacts would occur including lower water levels
in wetland areas and a more significant increase in peak flow rates to downstream watercourses.
The repair will also include replacing culverts which are in poor condition, have back slope, or are above legal grade. An
alternative culvert replacement plan is preferred for this repair which includes keeping the same sized culverts and placing
floodplain culverts where multiple culverts at a single crossing exists. The alternative culvert plan also includes leaving existing
culverts in place near the DNR Basin, WMA areas, and downstream areas near the outlet of the system to limit impacts to these
areas. The goal of the alternative culvert plan is to limit increases in downstream peak flow rates by providing flood retention
in upstream locations where the majority of the cleaning will occur. This will also prolong the timing of flow draining through
the system.
Project Impacts
The proposed project will have impacts on wetlands adjacent to the open channel when compared to the existing conditions.
Those impacts are described as follows.
There will be no areas of temporary fill associated with this project and no spoils will be placed within the adjacent wetland
areas. There will be 3700 square feet of fill associated with rip rap around the aprons of culverts proposed to be replaced. This
has been minimized to the extent possible to reduce wetland impacts while still providing erosion control to protect from scour
and additional erosion related impacts to surrounding resources.
Excavation areas were considered as areas where ditch cleaning activities will occur both within the existing channel footprint
and outside of the existing channel footprint. The majority of the excavation areas occur within the existing channel footprint.
However few areas do extent outside of the existing channel tops which will widen portions of the ditch.
Temporary impacts are areas where wetland vegetation will be impacted from placement of construction mats. In this case
cattails will be impacted by the mats and will be matted down in place. The cattails will not be excavated, removed, or sprayed
for access. If conditions allow during frozen periods in the winter, cattails may be mowed or burned off for ease of access during
construction but will not be permanently removed. Following construction cattails will reestablish in these areas.
Drainage impacts are referenced as areas that will no longer be inundated with water after storm events. These areas were
taken from the hydrologic/hydraulic model that was developed for this project. The impacts are calculated as the difference
between the maximum flood depths from the repair alternative and the existing conditions. It should be noted that these
impacts will not be greater than the conditions that existed 25-years ago. These “drainage wetland impacts” are referenced
from the existing conditions developed from the 2017 topographic survey.
The anticipated drainage wetland impacts from this project were assumed to be the difference between the existing and
proposed alternative 2-year rainfall frequency maximum flood extents. This is the most often occurring rainfall event used for
hydrologic analyses that provides hydrology to the wetlands. The difference in maximum flood extents for the 2-year rainfall
frequency was calculated at 18.3 acres and under larger frequencies those impacts decrease with an increase in rainfall.
Several maps are included in Attachment 4 which show the anticipated wetland impacts. Maps include the areas where
excavation and temporary wetland impacts will occur. Also a maximum flood extent map is included in to shown the anticipated
drainage wetland impacts that result from the cleaning of the open channel. Table 13 below summarizes the anticipated
wetland impacts as a result of this project.
Table 13: Project Impacts
Wetland Impact Area (Acres)
Fill Area 0.085
Excavation 5.11
Temporary 7.75
Drainage 18.30
Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will
require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be required
to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided
during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants
with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager.
Offsite alternatives were not considered as feasible options. Flow conveyance through JCD 9 in this area is continuously
diminishing as areas along the open channel have fully sedimented in and have substantially restricted flow. The open channel
is already in place and historically has adequately conveyed flow through the watershed in this location. There are no feasible
offsite alternatives that would abandon all the flow in the watershed that would make the project not necessary.
Attachment D
Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation
Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road
wetland replacement program. Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements.
Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an
existing wetland bank (with an account number in the State wetland banking system) for all or part of your
replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements.
Bank
Wetland Bank Major Credit Type
County Service Number of Credits
Account # Watershed # (if applicable)
Area #
1636 Lyon 25 9 0.17
Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at
least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project. This documentation could be a signed purchase
agreement, signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the
applicant and the bank owner. However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the
mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU.
Refer to attached wetland bank credit purchase agreement.

Attachment E-(Not Applicable)

Local Road Replacement Program Qualification
Complete this part if you are a local road authority (county highway department, city transportation department, etc.) seeking
verification that your project (or a portion of your project) qualifies for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement
Program (LGRWRP). If portions of your project are not eligible for the LGRWRP, then Attachment D should be completed and
attached to your application.
Discuss how your project is a repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable road to meet
state/federal design or safety standards/requirements. Applicants should identify the specific road deficiencies and how the
project will rectify them. Attach supporting documents and information as applicable:
Provide a map, plan, and/or aerial photograph accurately depicting wetland boundaries within the project area. Attach associated
delineation/determination report or otherwise explain the method(s) used to identify and delineate wetlands. Also attach and
discuss any type of review or approval of wetland boundaries or other aspects of the project by a member or members of the local
Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) or Corps of Engineers:
In the table below, identify only the wetland impacts from Part 4 that the road authority has determined should qualify for the
LGRWRP.
Wetland Impact ID Type of Impact Size of Impact County, Major Watershed #,

Existing Plant Community
(as noted on (fill, excavate, (square feet or and Bank Service Area # of
Type(s) in Impact Area1
overhead view) drain) acres to 0.01) Impact2
1Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2.
2Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7.
Discuss the feasibility of providing onsite compensatory mitigation/replacement for important site-specific wetland functions:
Please note that under the MN Wetland Conservation Act, projects with less than 10,000 square feet of wetland impact are
allowed to commence prior to submission of this notification so long as the notification is submitted within 30 days of the impact.
The Clean Water Act has no such provision and requires that permits be obtained prior to any regulated discharges into water of
the United States. To avoid potential unauthorized activities, road authorities must, at a minimum, provide a complete application
to the Corps and receive a permit prior to commencing work.
By signature below, the road authority attests that they have followed the process in MN Rules 8420.0544 and have determined
that the wetland impacts identified in Part 4 are eligible for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program.
Road Authority Representative: Title:
Signature: Date:
TEP member: Representing:

Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Upon approval and signature by the TEP, application must be sent to: Wetland Bank Administration
Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources
520 Lafayette Road North
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Attachment 1: Location
Attachment 1:
Location Maps
18675 Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 WCA Aplication 1 ISG

23 24
25 30 29 28 27 59
£
¤ 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25
Moyer Marysland
Shible 60
"
)
£
¤59
59
£
¤
36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36
59
5
6
11
59
£
¤
£
¤ 6
5
17
5
6 36
59
£
¤
59
£
¤ 6
5 10
2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 61
"
) 6 5 4 3 2
59
£
¤
59
£
¤
£
¤ 59
6
8
5
11 59
£ 12 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11
¤ 10 11 12
Swift
County
14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14
5
6 9
Appleton
5
6
6
West Bank
Edison
23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23
26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 65
)
" 28 27 26 62)
"
52
)
" 5
6 2
35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35
2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 11 )
"
Kragero
11 12 7 8 9 10 5
6 10
11 12 7 8 9 10 11
JCD 9 Open Ditch
34
)
"
14
13
18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14
14 13 Kragero 5
6
21
ß40
ª
M I NNESO T A
24 5
630
BIg Bend
23 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23
24
Chippewa
30
County
26 25 29
JCD 9 Watershed
28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26
30
32
33
6
5 31 12
)
" 12
)
"
35 36 73
)
" 31 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35
32 ß 7
ª
M I NNESO T A
4
5
633 5
6 32
2 1 3
6 5 2 1 6 5 4 Stev ens
3 Pope 2
County Coun ty
Swift
4
Swift
County County
5
626
33 Swift
Big Stone
10 )
"
County
Co un ty
Swift
County
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 G IS\Maps\WCA Maps\18675 JCD 9 Location Map.mxd
7
11 12 7 8 11
9 8 9 10 Swift 11
Lac Qui Parle
12
Tunsberg Cou nty
Chippewa
10
County
County
11
Ch
6
5 31 Co i ppe
La
un
c
t
Qu
Chippewa
wa
iP
arl
y ou n
14 6
5 9 County
eC
ty
14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14
13
Lac Qui
23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 19 20 21
Parle County
Yellow Medicine 22 23
µ
County
Location Map Legend PN: 15-18675

Source:
JCD 9 Watershed
Joint County Ditch No 9 JCD 9 Open Ditch
Chippewa and Swift County, Parcels (XX County, 12/16/2016)

Townships
0 1,500 3,000 6,000
Minnesota
Sections
1 inch = 6,000 feet
Friday, July 27, 2018 Counties (MN DNR, July 2013)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
27 110th St SW
26 25 30 29 28 27 110th St SW
98 110th St SW
52
"
) U 110th St SW
V241 V 110th St SW
U 238 V
U 5
6 2 110th St SW U
V229
V
U229
Swift
County
160th Ave SW
150th Ave SW
130th Ave SW
140th Ave SW
120th Ave SW
110th Ave SW
34 35 36 31 West Bank 32 33 34
Standard Open
DitchEdison
Cleaning
5
6V 9 V
U241 U
V238 98
V
U 65
)
"
U3
U
345 V
U
345 120th St SW U
345
V 120th St SW V Chip Swift St NW
U
220 Chip Swift St NW Chip Swift St NW 220 U
V
110th Ave NW
103rd Ave NW
150th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
3 2 1 6 5 4 3
11
U
V
83rd St NW 11 V
U
110th Ave NW
74
U
V 75 77
V
U
V
U
V
U 10 80th St NW 80th St NW 10
U
V 80th St NW U
V9 80th St NW
V
U 10
U
V 9
V
U
5
6 10
120th Ave NW
150th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
10 11 12 7 8 9 10
Cleaning Along 77
U
V
Roadways V
U74 75
V
U
110th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
U
V 13
V
U 70th St NW 13 70th St NW T-13
V
U
77
U
V
150th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
120th Ave NW
15 14 13 18 17 16 15
Kragero 34
"
)
74
U
V 75
V
U
60th St NW 60th St NW 60th St NW
ß 40 60th St NW 60th St NW 60th St NW
ª
60th St NW 60th St NW
M I NNESO T A
BIg Bend
103r d A
Cleaning Through
Wetland Areas
ve N
Unnamed 12009400
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
W
22 23 24 19 20 21 19
U
V 22
50
St NW
Chippewa
th
MN
County
77
U
V
V
U 74 75
TH
V
U
7
50th St NW 16 16
V U
U V 50th St NW 50th St NW 18
V
U 18
V
U 50th St NW 18
V
U 50th St NW
74
V
U 75
V
U 18
V
U
M
No Construction
NT
H
7
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
100th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
27 26 25 30 29 28 27
77
V
U
74
U
V
6
31
)
" 40th St NW 40th St NW 40th St NW
M
75
NT
V
U
H
7
JCD 9 Watershed
130th Ave NW
6
5 9
120th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
140th Ave NW
34 35 36 31 32 33 34
ß 7
ª
M I NNESO T A
100th Ave NW
M
N
TH
7
77
V
U
130th Ave NW
30th St NW 23
V
U 23
U
V 30th St NW 23
V
U
V 23
V
U
Lac Qui Parle (SE Bay) 37004601
5
6 32 Stev ens
County
Swift
Pope
Coun ty
County
Swift
County
81
V
U
100th Ave NW
110th Ave NW
95th Ave NW
M
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 G IS\Maps\WCA Maps\18675 JCD 9 Repair O verview Map.mxd
N
Swift
Big Stone
TH
County
3
Co un ty
5 4 3
Swift
2 1 6 County
7
Tunsberg
Swift
Cou nty
Chippewa
County
Unnamed 12007500 20th S Ch

t N Co i ppe
81
V
U
La
un
c
33 20th St NW 20th St NW 27
V
U 20th St NW V
U t NW
27 20th StChippewa
Qu
)
" 20th St NW V
U 76
wa
iP
arl
y ou n
10 County
eC
100th Ave NW
110th Ave SW
140th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
95th Ave NW
ty
11 12 7 8 9 10
MN
TH
Unnamed 12008900
Lac Qui
7
Parle County
Yellow Medicine
µ
County
Repair Overview Map Legend PN: 15-18675

Source:
Joint County Ditch No 9 JCD 9 Watershed
No Construction
Standard Cleaning

Cleaning Along Roadways Townships Parcels (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Minnesota
0 750 1,500 3,000
Cleaning Through Wetland Areas Sections Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
Thursday, August 02, 2018 1 inch = 3,000 feet
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Attachment 2: Historical Wetland Maps
Attachment 2:
Historical Wetland Maps

Section 2
Kragero Township
1993 Wetland Boundary
80th St NW 10
V
U
11
35
34 Edison
36
Section 11
Kragero Township
3 2 1
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 G IS\Maps\WCA Maps\18675 Historical Aerials Maps.mxd
10 11 12
Kragero
15 14 13
22
µ
Historical Wetland Boundaries 1993 Historic Aerial PN: 15-18675
Legend
Joint County Ditch No 9 1993 Wetland Boundary
Source:

2017 Boundary Tile/Ditch (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
Monday, July 30, 2018 1 inch = 500 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Section 2
Kragero Township
80th St NW 10
V
U
11
35
34 Edison
36
Section 11
Kragero Township
3 2 1
10 11 12
Kragero
15 14 13
22
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
140th Ave NW
2 1
74
V
U
80th St NW 10
U
V 10
U
V 80th St NW

140th Ave NW
Section 12
11 Kragero Township
12
74
V
U
35 Edison 36 31
70th St NW 13
V
U West
13
V
U 70th St NW Bank
74
V
U 2 1 6
11 12 7
140th Ave NW
14 13
Kragero
14 13 18
BIg Bend
23 24 19
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
140th Ave NW
2 1
74
V
U
80th St NW 10
U
V 10
U
V 80th St NW

140th Ave NW
Section 12
11 Kragero Township
12
74
V
U
35 Edison 36 31
70th St NW 13
V
U West
70th St NW
13
V
U Bank
74
V
U 2 1 6
11 12 7
140th Ave NW
14 13
Kragero
14 13 18
BIg Bend
23 24 19
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
12 7
130th Ave NW
75
U
V
13
U
V 70th St NW 70th St NW
13
U
V
Section 13
Kragero Township
130th Ave NW
13 18
75
V
U
35 Edison 36 31
West
Bank
2 1 6
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
75
V
U 11 12 7
Kragero
130th Ave NW
18
24 19
14 13
BIg Bend
23 24 19
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1 inch = 500 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
12 7
130th Ave NW
75
U
V
13
U
V 70th St NW 70th St NW
13
U
V
Section 13
Kragero Township
130th Ave NW
13 18
75
V
U
35 Edison 36 31
West
Bank
2 1 6
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
75
V
U 11 12 7
Kragero
130th Ave NW
18
24 19
14 13
BIg Bend
23 24 19
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1 inch = 500 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
120th Ave NW
18 17
77
U
V 60th St NW
40 60th St NW
ß
ª
M I NNESO T A
Section 19
120th Ave NW
Big Bend Township 20
19
77
V
U
U
V
18
U
V
12 7 8
77
V
U
13
18 17
Kragero
120th Ave NW
29
30
24 19 20
25 30 29
BIg Bend
36 31 32
µ
Historical Wetland Boundaries Legend 1993 Historic Aerial PN: 15-18675
Source:

Minnesota
Sections
0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
120th Ave NW
18 17
77
U
V 60th St NW
40 60th St NW
ß
ª
M I NNESO T A
Section 19
120th Ave NW
Big Bend Township 20
19
77
V
U
U
V
18
U
V
12 7 8
77
V
U
13
18 17
Kragero
120th Ave NW
29
30
24 19 20
25 30 29
BIg Bend
36 31 32
µ
Source:

Minnesota
Sections
0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
19 20
77
V
U
18
U
V 50th St NW
Section 29
Big Bend Township
29
30

120th Ave NW
12
)
" 40th St NW
77
U
V
18 17 16
77
V
U
19 20 21
BIg Bend
30 29
31 32
28
120th Ave NW
31 32 33
6 5 Tunsberg 4
µ
Source:

Minnesota
Sections
0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
19 20
77
V
U
18
U
V 50th St NW
Section 29
Big Bend Township
29
30

120th Ave NW
12
)
" 40th St NW
77
U
V
18 17 16
77
V
U
19 20 21
BIg Bend
30 29
31 32
28
120th Ave NW
31 32 33
6 5 Tunsberg 4
µ
Source:

Minnesota
Sections
0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Section 28
Big Bend Township
110th Ave NW
29 28
40th St NW 12
)
" 40th St NW
34
"
)
110th Ave NW
32 33
Section 33
2017 Wetland Boundary Big Bend Township
35 Edison 36 31
West
Bank
2 1 6
11 12 7
Kragero
14 13 18
BIg Bend
23 24 19
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
Wednesday, December 05, 2018 1 inch = 500 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Section 28
Big Bend Township
110th Ave NW
29 28
40th St NW 12
)
" 40th St NW
34
"
)
110th Ave NW
32 33
Section 33
2017 Wetland Boundary Big Bend Township
35 Edison 36 31
West
Bank
2 1 6
11 12 7
Kragero
14 13 18
BIg Bend
23 24 19
µ
Legend
Source:

Minnesota
Sections 0 125 250 500
Wednesday, December 05, 2018 1 inch = 500 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Attachment 3: Preliminary Construction Plans
Attachment 3:
Preliminary Construction Plans

CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR: ISG PROJECT # 15-18675
PREFERRED REPAIR ALTERNATIVE L I M I N ARY CTION
U
PRE CONSTR
OR
OT F
LEGEND N
EXISTING
SHEET INDEX
1 TITLE
CITY LIMITS
2 NOTES & QUANTITIES
SECTION LINE 3 DETAILS
QUARTER SECTION LINE 4 DETAILS
RIGHT OF WAY LINE 5 DETAILS
6 LEGAL DITCH OVERVIEW
PROPERTY / LOTLINE
7 REPAIR OVERVIEW
EASEMENT LINE 8 SPOIL PLACEMENT NORTH
ACCESS CONTROL 9 SPOIL PLACEMENT SOUTH I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
WATER EDGE 10 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
WETLAND BOUNDARY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
12 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
WETLAND / MARSH CSAH 6 13 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE CHARLES J. BRANDEL
FENCE LINE 14 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE
CULVERT 15 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE
16 MAINLINE PLAN & PROFILE 12-20-18 43359
STORM SEWER DATE LIC. NO.
17 BRANCH 1 PLAN & PROFILE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
SANITARY SEWER 18 BRANCH 1 PLAN & PROFILE REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
CSAH 2
TH
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
WATER
7
GAS
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CHIPPEWA & DATE LIC. NO.
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SWIFT JCD No. 9 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
UNDERGROUND TV AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
OVERHEAD UTILITY
80TH ST NW
UNDERGROUND UTILITY PROJECT
CSAH 9
MA
CSAH 10
IN
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC
160TH AVE NW
LIN
E
990 CONTOUR (MAJOR)
989 CONTOUR (MINOR) 70TH ST NW
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
AREAPLACEMENT
SPOIL #1
1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT 6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND
DECIDUOUS TREE DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED,
140TH AVE NW
OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO
CONIFEROUS TREE
TREE LINE TH 40 / 60TH ST NW
TH 40 / 60TH ST NW
(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS
AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND
MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF
DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS
JOINT COUNTY
ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY
DITCH No. 9
MANHOLE/STRUCTURE BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE
BRAN
CH 2
WORK.
130TH AVE NW
CATCH BASIN 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL
SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN 7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
HYDRANT 50TH ST NW COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC
TH
TH 29
REVISION SCHEDULE
7
AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. CORROSION.

VALVE
MA
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
INL
INE
100TH AVE NW
3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER 8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES
120TH AVE NW
CURB STOP N SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF
POWER POLE CR 12 / 40TH ST NW CR 12 / 40TH ST NW OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. THE KNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY
UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET 4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY
THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE
W E DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY
UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROPOSED DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION
IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR
OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
LOT LINE 30TH ST NW VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.
5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF
9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE
RIGHT OF WAY S THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED
ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS
THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR PROJECT NO. 15-18675
EASEMENT LOCATION MAP IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC
DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION
(1-800-252-1166). CAD FILE NAME 18675 TITLE
SCALE IN FEET DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE
CULVERT DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE DRAWN BY JAG
STORM SEWER 0 6,000 12,000 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. DESIGNED BY MAO
STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) REVIEWED BY CJB
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY SEWER (PIPE WIDTH)
PROJECT INDEX: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.

12/21/2018
WATER SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE

GAS OWNER: PROJECT MANAGING OFFICE: TITLE
ADDRESS / LOCATION: ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE COUNTY OF B.M. ELEVATION=1023.08
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CHIPPEWAREQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD
2016 EDITION, AND THE 0.2 MILES WEST OF INTERSECTION OF CR 34
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION,
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CHIPPEWA AND SWIFT JOINT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM & RUNK HWY 40 71.3 FT SOUTH OF TRUNK HWY
UNDERGROUND TV COUNTY DRAINAGE AUTHORITY SEC: 1-3, 10-15, 23-26 DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
2013, UNLESS DIRECTED 40 1 FT EAST OF THE CENTER OF THE ENTERANCE TITLE
1015 CONTOUR 629 NORTH ELEVENTH STREET KRAGERO TWP MANKATO OFFICE
OTHERWISE.
MANHOLE MONTEVIDEO, MN 56265 SEC: 6-7, 18-20, 28-33 115 E HICKORY STREET PROJECT DATUM
CATCH BASIN BIG BEND TWP SUITE 300 HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE
MANKATO, MN 56001 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83),
1996ADJUSTMENT
HYDRANT PHONE: 507.387.6651 (NAD83(1996)) ON THECHIPPEWACOUNTY COORDINATE
SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET
VALVE CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MINNESOTA FAX: 507.387.3583 ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH
1
AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS
PROJECT MANAGER: CHUCK BRANDEL RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL OF DATA COLLECTED IN JANUARY 2017
BY ISG.
EMAIL: CHUCK.BRANDEL@IS-GRP.COM AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT.
OF 18
MI NARY CTION
L I U
PRE CONSTR
GENERAL OPEN DITCH NOTES: OR
1. DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A DRAINAGE OUTLET FOR THE ENTIRE CHIPPEWA JCD 9 SYSTEM. N OT F
2. AREAS WHERE A 16.5-FOOT GRASS STRIP DOES NOT EXIST OR HAS BEEN DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PLANTED AFTER ALL WORK HAS
BEEN COMPLETED IN THAT AREA, & SHALL COMPLY TO SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINED IN THE SPEC BOOK. THESE AREAS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO WITHIN A 16.5- FOOT WIDE BUFFER AREA ALONG PROPOSED DITCH
ALIGNMENTS. DISTURBANCE THROUGH ROAD CROSSINGS, ROAD DITCHES, AND GRASS BUFFERS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE WIDTH OF A TRENCH NECESSARY
FOR SAFE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES.
4. ALL EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO SPARE SOIL TYPES. TOP SOIL SHALL BE REPLACED BAKE ON TOP OF COMPACTED BACKFILL AND
TOP TWO (2) FEET SHALL BE LEFT UN-COMPACTED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. EXCAVATED SPOILS SHALL BE SPREAD EVENLY IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS AS TO
NOT IMPEDE DRAINAGE. ALL EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE TO KEEP TOPSOIL ON TOP. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
5. PLACE ALL SPOILS FROM DITCH CLEANING ON LOWER SIDE OF THE DITCH NO WIDER THAN 16.5-FOOT WIDE FROM TOP OF SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. SPOIL LEVELING/GRADING IS INCIDENTAL TO OPEN DITCH CLEANING. STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
6. TOP SOIL IN SPOIL AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS, SHALL BE STRIPPED PRIOR SPOIL PLACEMENT.
7. MINOR SHAPING AROUND SIDE INTAKES, WASCOBs & CULVERT INLETS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THESE RESPECTIVE PAY ITEMS.
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
8. EXISTING TILES AT OUTLETS MAY BE SALVAGED, REUSED, & PROTECTED WITH RIPRAP IF THE OUTLET IS DEEMED IN GOOD SHAPE, BY THE ENGINEER. TILE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPAIR AT THESE LOCATIONS SHALL BE PAID FOR AS BID ITEM "ARMOR TILE". SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
9. ANY EXISTING TILES IN OPEN DITCH, INCLUDING ANY NOT ON PLANS, SHALL BE REPAIRED WITH RIPRAP, GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, RODENT GUARD, & 20 LF OF
SPECIFIED PIPE SIZE WHERE NEEDED. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTE, HDPE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL FOR ALL TILE REPAIRS, (SEE DETAIL AG440)
10. ANY ROAD CROSSING REPAIRS SHALL BE CLASS III RCP ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFIED ON PLANS OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. TIE ALL PIPE SECTIONS UNDER
ROAD CROSSINGS (INCIDENTAL). DATE LIC. NO.

11. MISC. TREE CLEARING OUTSIDE OF CALLED OUT AREAS ON THE PLANS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO NORMAL DITCH CLEANING. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
12. TREES LARGER THAN 6" IN DIAMETER CALLED OUT ON PLANS SHALL BE PAID FOR AS BID ITEM "CLEAR AND GRUB TREES (OVER 6")".
PROJECT
13. PROTECT & ARMOR CULVERT INCLUDES RIPRAP ON TYPE IV FABRIC AND SHALL BE PAID FOR BY CY OF RIPRAP, FABRIC & GRADING ARE INCIDENTAL
14. ALL SPOILS FROM OPEN CHANNEL CLEANING MUST BE HAULED OUT OF WETLAND AREAS AND PLACED IN IDENTIFIED BORROW AREAS. WHERE INDICATED AS "
CLEAN AND REMOVE SPOILS" CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
15. SPOIL PLACEMENT AREAS SHOWN MUST BE ACCESSED FOR SPOIL PLACEMENT ONLY AND HAULING ROUTES MUST FOLLOW SHORTEST PATH TO THOSE
AREAS. NO TOPSOIL STRIPPING WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PLACEMENT ON TOP OF LIGHT OR SAND SOILS. LEVELING OF SPOILS IS REQUIRED AFTER SPOIL
PLACEMENT AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 8-INCHES THICK , SPOILS SHALL BE SPREAD IN A UNIFORM MANNER. ACTUAL FILL AREA TO BE DETERMINED BY
JOINT COUNTY
ENGINEER AND LANDOWNERS AND WILL BE FLAGGED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. DITCH No. 9
16. CONSTRUCTION MATS ARE REQUIRED FOR ACCESS AND CLEANING THROUGH WETLAND AREAS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MOBILIZATION, CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL MATS USED FOR OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND ARE PAID FOR BY LINEAR FOOT OF MATS ALONG THE OPEN
REVISION SCHEDULE
DITCH CLEANING. EXTRA MATS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OR SPOIL PLACEMENT AREAS AND WILL BE PAID FOR BY LINEAR FOOT.
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
17. DITCH CLEANING FROM ROADWAYS WILL BE ALLOWED IN AREAS IDENTIFIED AS "OPEN DITCH CLEANING & SPOIL HAULING". IN THESE AREAS CONSTRUCTION
MATS ARE NOT REQUIRED AND WORK WILL BE PAID OR IN BID ITEM " DITCH CLEANING, SPOIL HAULING". ACTUAL LENGTHS WILL VARY BASED ON SIZE
CONDITION AT THAT TIME. IF CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLEANING FROM ROADWAY, CONSTRUCTION MATS MAY BE USED AND WILL BE PAID FOR BY
LINEAR FOOT OF CLEANING & FOR INSTALLATION & REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATS.
18. CONSTRUCTION PHASES WERE DEVELOPED FOR PURPOSES OF ACCESS TO CLEANING AND HAULING AREAS BASED ON TIME PERIODS OF FLOW FROM THE
JCD9 WATERSHED. PHASE LENGTHS MAY VARY BY MAT LENGTH DURING CONSTRUCTION BUT NO EXTRA PAYMENT WILL BE AUTHORIZED FROM PHASES
VARYING SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE PHASES PROVIDED IN THESE PLANS.
19. TEMPORARY DITCH FLOW RESTRICTION MAY INCLUDE ANY CULVERT BLOCKS, DITCH PLUGS, OR EARTHEN BERMS TO RESTRICT FLOW FOR CLEANING OF CAD FILE NAME 18675 NOTES & QUANTITIES
EACH PHASE. TEMPORARY DITCH FLOW RESTRICTIONS WILL BE PAID FOR BY EACH FOR THE INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL FOR EACH IDENTIFIED PHASES. NO DRAWN BY JAG
ADDITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE AUTHORIZED FOR TEMPORARY DITCH FLOW RESTRICTION DUE FROM ADDITIONAL PHASE AREAS VARYING FROM THE DESIGNED BY MAO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS. TEMPORARY DITCH FLOW RESTRICTIONS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED FOR LONGER THAN 7 DAYS WITH OUT AUTHORIZATION FROM THE REVIEWED BY CJB
ENGINEER. ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018

20. ALL DEWATERING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF JCD 9 INCLUDED IN THESE PLANS IS INCIDENTAL TO ALL BID ITEMS.
TITLE
NOTES &
QUANTITIES
SHEET
2 OF 18
NOTE: ALL TILE OUTLETS AND FIELD INTAKES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR PROTECTED
PROPOSED GRADE (REPAIR WASHOUT TO

MATCH ORIGINAL DITCH SIDESLOPES)
GRASS STRIP (VARIES) GRASS STRIP (VARIES) PROPOSED GRADE (REPAIR WASHOUT TO
MATCH ORIGINAL DITCH SIDESLOPES) Y
L IM INARRUCTION
PLACE RIPRAP AND FABRIC GRASS STRIP (VARIES) GRASS STRIP (VARIES) PRE CONST
AT TILE OUTLET (INCIDENTAL) FOR
(SEE DETAIL AG350) NOT
EXISTING WASHOUT OR DITCH BANK
NOTES:
1. TILE JOINT BETWEEN FIELD TILE & OUTLET SECTION SHALL BE WRAPPED IN TYPE I EXISTING WASHOUT OR DITCH BANK
FABRIC AND CONCRETED, OR CONNECTED WITH APPROPRIATE FITTINGS, IF
APPROVED BY ENGINEER.
BRANCH OR PRIVATE TILE OUTLET TO DITCH, TYP. 2. RIPRAP AT OUTLET SHALL NOT IMPEDED FLOW FROM PIPE. RIPRAP AT OUTLET SHALL
ALSO EXTEND ABOVE & ALONG SIDES.
3. ALL TILES DEEMED TO BE SATISFACTORY SHALL BE LEFT INPLACE, ARMORED WITH
CLASS III RIPRAP ON TYPE 3 FABRIC & HAVE A RODENT GUARD INSTALLED. THESE
INSTALL NEW H.D.P.E. DUAL WALL OR PVC PIPE FOR END 20' OF SHALL BE PAID FOR AS "ARMOR TILES" ON THE BID QUANTITIES.
OUTLETS INTO DITCH, TYP. 4. ADDITIONAL TILES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT ON PLANS.
VARIES
5. ALL TILE REPAIR/REPLACEMENT SHALL BE PAID AS A LUMP SUM FOR EACH PER DETAIL
CLEAN SLOUGHED MATERIAL FROM DITCH BOTTOM SHOWN. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
(MATCH EXISTING GRADES) 6. RODENT GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL TILE REPAIRS, AND ARE INCIDENTAL REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
TO ALL TILE REPAIRS. VARIES SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
CLEAN SLOUGHED MATERIAL FROM DITCH BOTTOM STATE OF MINNESOTA.
(MATCH EXISTING GRADES)
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
TYPICAL TILE OUTLET REPAIR TYPICAL SLOUGH REPAIR DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
NTS AG440 NTS AG430
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
NOTES: CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE AND THICKNESS WILL BE DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS
REVISION SCHEDULE
1. FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 1.5'-2' DATE DESCRIPTION BY
2. THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS OPTION, MAY SUBSTITUTE A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, SPEC. 3601 FOR THE
GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET. THE FABRIC SHOULD COVER THE FILTER BLANKET. THE FABRIC
SHOULD COVER THE PIPE BY 3'.
DIMENSIONS
PIPE DIA. RIPRAP
PROPOSED PIPE RIPRAP PROJECT NO. 15-18675
DRAWN BY JAG
1'(1) 54" & UP 20 CY CLASS IV DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB

GRANULAR FILTER
BLANKET (2)
TITLE
TYPICAL TILE OUTLET DETAILS

NTS AG530
SHEET
3 OF 18
ADJUST TOP OF DITCH AS
NECESSARY
1
FULLY RESTORE ORIGINAL 2:1
1 SIDESLOPE WHERE POSSIBLE
MI NARY CTION
L I U
PRE CONSTR
DEPTH VARIES
EXISTING SIDESLOPE CLEANOUT SLOUGHED MATERIAL
OR
N OT F
RESTORE EXISTING
LEGAL GRADE
3'
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

STANDARD DITCH CLEANING REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
NTS AG420 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

33' CONSTRUCTION LIMIT WIDTH VARIES
JOINT COUNTY
EXISTING GROUND ADJUST TOP OF DITCH AS
NECESSARY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
CLEANOUT SPOIL MATERIAL DATE DESCRIPTION BY
MATS FOR TURNAROUND INSTALL CONSTRUCTION

AND ACCESS ALLOWED MATS NO GREATER THAN
UP TO 33' FROM TOP OF 20' FROM TOP OF DITCH
DITCH FOR CLEANING AND
HAULING
DEPTH VARIES
RESTORE ORIGINAL 1:1
SIDE SLOPE OR FLATTEN
TO MATCH ADJACENT PROJECT NO. 15-18675
BACK SLOPES
1 DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
1 REVIEWED BY CJB

TITLE
3'
DETAILS
DITCH CLEANING THROUGH WETLAND AREAS

NTS AG420.1
SHEET
4 OF 18
FIELD CROSSING AGGREGATE SECTION
6" MnDOT CL. 5 AGGREGATE SURFACING
(GRAVEL ROAD AGGREGATE SECTION, SEE DETAIL AG140)
SLOPE @ .02'/FT.
TYP DITCH SLOPE
MI NARY CTION
L I U
ON MnDOT TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PRE CONSTR
MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP (SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE) OR
TYP ROAD DITCH SLOPE N OT F
10" MnDOT CLASS V AGGREGATE WITH QUALITY (SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE) CULVERT
COMPACTION
TOP OF RIPRAP
DIRECTION OF FLOW @ DITCH FLOW LINE
MnDOT TYPE V GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE RCP DITCH CULVERT

MATERIAL (DEPTH VARIES) IMPERVIOUS CLAY PLUG
(TIE ALL SECTIONS)
(8" LIFTS) @ END OF PIPE BEDDING
TYP BOTH ENDS

6" GRANULAR BACKFILL AROUND SECTION REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
PROPOSED PIPE NTS SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
PROPOSED PIPE CONSTRUCT FIELD CROSSING AGGREGATE CHARLES J. BRANDEL
(SIZE VARIES) TO MATCH EXIST. CROSSING WIDTH.
FIELD CROSSING
6" GRANULAR BEDDING UNDER
PROPOSED PIPE DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
TOP OF DITCH SLOPE
EXISTING GROUND END OF CROSSING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
AGGREAGATE SURF. REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP STATE OF MINNESOTA.
(SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE)
DETAIL A
TOE OF DITCH SLOPE VARIES
14'
DATE LIC. NO.

DIRECTION OF FLOW AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
DIRECTION OF FLOW WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT
14'
16'
(SEE RIPRAP QUANTITY TABLE) CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
DITCH CULVERT 15' 20'
VARIES VARIES
JOINT COUNTY
REPAIR ROAD AS REQUIRED OR CONST. FIELD
CROSSING AGGREGATE SURFACING TO
DITCH No. 9
EVEN WITH TOP OF DITCH SLOPES
DETAIL A CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
GRASS SHOULDER REVISION SCHEDULE

VARIES VARIES PLAN
(GRADE VARIES) DATE DESCRIPTION BY
NTS
RIPRAP QUANTITY
EQUIVALENT SIZE UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM
42" - 60" 10 CY - 20 CY
66" - 96" 20 CY - 30 CY PROJECT NO. 15-18675

DRAWN BY JAG
SECTION DESIGNED BY MAO
NOTES: REVIEWED BY CJB
1. OPEN DITCH CULVERTS MUST BE WATERTIGHT, GASKETED, AND TONGUE AND ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
NOTES: GROOVE DESIGN CONFORM TO MnDOT 3006F.
1. ADDITIONAL CLASS III AGGREGATE MAY BE NEEDED TO MEET MINIMUM 10" DEPTH. 2. SEE TYPICAL ROAD SECTION DETAIL AG700
2. SEE DISTURBED GRASS SHOULDER WITH MnDOT 25-142 WITH MnDOT CATEGORY 3 3. GRAVEL ROAD RESTORATION PAID SEPARATE TO CULVERT RESTORATION. TITLE
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 4. AGGREGATE SURFACE IS INCIDENTAL TO CROSSING OR ROAD RESTORATION
3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED ROADS UNTIL THE 5. TIE ALL RCP PIPE SECTIONS (INCIDENTAL TO CROSSING)
PROJECT IS COMPLETED OR ROAD AUTHORITY HAS RESUMED CONTROL; WHICHEVER
IS SOONER 6. RIPRAP QUANTITIES ESTIMATED (AS SHOWN IN TABLE). ADDITIONAL QUANTITY MAY BE
REQUIRED BY ENGINEER AND/OR SHOWN ON PLANS. ALL RIPRAP QUANTITIES WILL BE
PAID FOR BY CY INSTALLED.
DETAILS
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION TYPICAL FIELD CROSSING
NTS AG700 NTS AG750
SHEET
5 OF 18
BRANCH 1
4 3 2 1 6 5
APPROXIMATE JD9
OVERALL WATERSHED
AREA= 17,200 ACRES
0 1500 3000 4500
80TH ST NW
SCALE IN FEET
BEGINNING OF
JCD NO. 9 OPEN DITCH

ARY CTION
MA
L I M I N U
PRE CONSTR
IN
160TH AVE NW
LIN
OR
OT F
E
N
10 11 12 7 8
70TH ST NW

SPOIL
AREA PLACEMENT
#1

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
140TH AVE NW
15 14 13 18 17 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
MILAN STATE OF MINNESOTA.
TH 40 / 60TH ST NW
DATE LIC. NO.
PUBLIC WATER BASIN
ID# 12009400 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
BRAN
PROJECT
CH 2
23 20
130TH AVE NW
24 19 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
50TH ST NW
TH

7
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
MA
IN
LIN
100TH AVE NW
E
120TH AVE NW
26 25 30 29 28
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
CR 12 / 40TH ST NW REVIEWED BY CJB

TITLE
LEGAL DITCH
31 32 33 OVERVIEW
END OF LEGAL DITCH
SHEET
30TH ST NW
6 OF 18
LEGEND
BRANCH 1 EXISTING OPEN DITCH
OPEN DITCH CLEANING

THROUGH WETLAND AREA
3 2 1 6 5
OPEN DITCH CLEANING

SPOIL HAULING
STANDARD DITCH CLEANING APPROXIMATE JD9
OVERALL WATERSHED
AREA = 17,200 ACRES
OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND SPOIL HAULING

80TH ST NW M I N ARY CTION
L I U
PRE CONSTR
PHASE 13 OR
SPOIL PLACEMENT
N OT F
AREA #11, 12 & 13
PHASE 12
REPLACE & LOWER CULVERT PHASE 11

REPLACE & LOWER CULVERTS
MA
0 1200 2400 3600
IN
160TH AVE NW
LIN
PHASE 10
E
SCALE IN FEET
SPOIL PLACEMENT
AREA #10
10 11 12 7 8
SPOIL PLACEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA.
PHASE 9 AREA #8 & 9 CHARLES J. BRANDEL
PHASE 8
70TH ST NW DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
SPOIL PLACEMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
AREA #7 PHASE 7 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
REPLACE & LOWER CULVERT
SPOIL
AREA PLACEMENT
#1
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SPOIL PLACEMENT
OPEN DITCH CLEANING AREA #5 & 6
THROUGH WETLAND AREA PHASE 6
140TH AVE NW
DATE LIC. NO.
15 14 13 PHASE 5 18 17
PROJECT
SPOIL PLACEMENT
AREA #4
MILAN CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
REPLACE CULVERT
PHASE 4
TH 40 / 60TH ST NW JOINT COUNTY

DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
BRAN
PUBLIC WATER BASIN
CH 2
ID# 12009400
23 20
130TH AVE NW
24 19
PHASE 3 SPOIL PLACEMENT
AREA # 2 & 3 PROJECT NO. 15-18675
OPEN DITCH CLEANING
THROUGH WETLAND AREAS
DRAWN BY JAG
PHASE 2 DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
50TH ST NW
TH

7
OPEN DITCH CLEANING SPOIL PLACEMENT

AND SPOIL HAULING AREA # 1 TITLE
PHASE 1
MA
INL
REPAIR OVERVIEW
INE
100TH AVE NW
120TH AVE NW
26 25 30 29 28
SHEET
7 OF 18
OYEN, MARTIN C
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL 227.09 AC LEGEND
243.92 AC EXISTING OPEN DITCH
80TH ST NW OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND SPOIL

HAULING THROUGH WETLAND AREA
OPEN DITCH CLEANING
PHASE 13
SPOIL PLACEMENT OPEN DITCH CLEANING AND
SPOIL HAULING
PHASE # 11 & 12
PHASE 12
JOHNSON, THOMAS W
PHASE 11
120 AC
M I N ARY CTION
L I U
PRE CONSTR
JOHNSON, THOMAS W JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY OR
OT F
160 AC 160 AC N
MA
IN
L IN
E
PHASE 10
JOHNSON, ERIK 0 500 1000 1500
80 AC
SCALE IN FEET
11 JOHNSON, CONNIE
20 AC
12
SPOIL PLACEMENT
PHASE # 10
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

PHASE 9 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
JOHNSON, BERGEN D & BESS Y STATE OF MINNESOTA.
60 AC
SPOIL PLACEMENT
PHASE # 8 & 9
DATE LIC. NO.
JOHNSON, PAUL THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
PROJECT
PHASE 8
70TH ST NW CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
PHASE 7 JOINT COUNTY

SPOIL PLACEMENT
PHASE #7 SANDVEN, LEROY DITCH No. 9
160 AC CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
REVISION SCHEDULE
SPOIL PLACEMENT
SPOIL
AREA PLACEMENT
#1
JOHNSON, DOROTHY D PHASE # 5 & 6

DATE DESCRIPTION BY
160 AC

DRAWN BY JAG
PHASE 6 DESIGNED BY MAO
REVIEWED BY CJB
14 13 JOHNSON, DALE T
18
140TH AVE NW
142.56 AC TITLE
STATE OF MINNESOTA SPOIL PLACEMENT

82.04 AC
NORTH
PHASE 5
SPOILS PLACEMENT
#4
SHEET
PHASE 4
8 OF 18
STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOHNSON, DALE TMOLDEN, VIRGENE & LINDA ETAL TH 40 / 60TH ST NW
82.04 AC 142.56 AC 230.00 AC LEGEND
EXISTING OPEN DITCH
OPEN DITCH CLEANING
OPEN DITCH SPOT CLEANING
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
STATE OF MINNESOTA
KVISTERO, KEITH & MARLYS 75.94
80 AC PMBB FARM PARTNERSHIP, LLP
160 AC MACDONALD, KAREN E
160 AC
M I N ARY CTION
L I U
PRE CONSTR
BRAN
OR
N OT F
CH 2
MOEN, ARLENE LEE, RUTH ANN LIFE ESTATE ETAL
95.00 AC 76.2 AC
0 500 1000 1500
19 PHASE 3 20 SCALE IN FEET

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
130TH AVE NW
LEE, JONATHAN ETAL OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M CHARLES J. BRANDEL
76.5 AC 80 AC 80 AC
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
SPOILS PLACEMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
#2 & 3 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
PHASE 2
LEE, JONATHAN ETAL BOHM, JUDITH L ANGRIMSON, CRAIG, JAMES & JEFF DATE LIC. NO.
76.8 AC 80 AC 85 AC THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.

PROJECT
50TH ST NW
SPOILS PLACEMENT #1 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
PHASE 1
OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M JOINT COUNTY

80 AC DITCH No. 9
LEE, RUTH ANN LIFE ESTATE ETAL CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
80 AC REVISION SCHEDULE
MA
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
INL
INE
DEUTSCH FAMILY LIMITED PARTERSHIP
80 AC

DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
30 29
REVIEWED BY CJB
LEE, RUTH ANN LIFE ESTATE ETAL

120TH AVE NW
160 AC TITLE

SOUTH
STATE OF MINNESOTA
KANTEN, KENT & KIM REVOC LIV TRUSTS
79.76 AC 10.12 AC 41 AC SHEET
9 OF 18
991
SPRAY, PAUL J & PATRICIA
992
80 AC
991
EXISTING 97"x152"
ARCH RCP 991 EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. SPRAY, DOUGLAS E
92
I(W)=984.96
88
80 AC
91
87
991
90
89
990 I(E)=983.61
0
99
86
994
9994
990
9
85
993
5
99
99
84
79
988 0
80
83
81
78
992
82
989
77
991 0 200 400
76
991
995 991 990
994
989 SCALE IN FEET
75
992
993
74
ARY CTION
PROFILE SCALES
54
I N
73
I M U
55
41 AC 995 L
PRE CONSTR
72
56
71
OR
53
987
EXISTING CENTERLINE OT F 10
70
N
52
69
98
NW EXISTING 97"X152 57
6
68
ET
TRE
67
ARCH RCP
51
HS
66
988
50
0T I(N)=984.44 V
E NW
58
2/4
992
49
I(S)=983.99 991
1
59
E
65
CR
48
990
20
60
61
VIESSMAN, WAYNE ETAL
62
63
V
R
64
47
989
A
990
46
T.
TH
992 990
988
120 AC
45
0 100 200
110
44
STATE OF MINNESOTA
43
3
4
0
40 AC
3
SCALE IN FEET
42
2 3
CR
41
991
3
40
39
99
38
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
36
STATE OF MINNESOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA 35 991

12-20-18 43359
991
DATE LIC. NO.
40 AC 108.73 AC 990 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
33
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
32
0
990
99
98
31
9
30
989
END OF LEGAL DITCH
29
DATE LIC. NO.
28
27
PROJECT
DOUGLAS E SPRAY STATE OF MINNESOTA WAYNE VIESSMAN
1010 1010
NO CONSTRUCTION
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

NO CONSTRUCTION
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DITCH No. 9
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) END OF LEGAL DITCH
DATE DESCRIPTION BY

980 980
987.16
987.14
987.12
987.10
987.08
987.06
987.04
987.02
987.00
986.98
986.96
986.94
986.92
986.90
986.88
986.86
986.84
986.82
986.80
986.78
986.76
986.74
986.72
986.70
986.68
986.4
986.5
986.0
985.6
986.7
987.2
986.1
986.8
986.8
986.7
986.6
986.6
986.5
986.0
986.4
986.4
986.3
986.2
986.2
986.1
986.1
986.0
985.9
985.9
985.8
970 55+00 54+00 53+00 52+00 51+00 50+00 49+00 48+00 47+00 46+00 45+00 44+00 43+00 42+00 41+00 40+00 39+00 38+00 37+00 36+00 35+00 34+00 33+00 32+00 31+00 970
110TH 40TH CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES
STATE OF MINNESOTA PAUL J & PATRICIA SPRAY STATE OF MINNESOTA DOUGLAS E SPRAY DRAWN BY JAG
AVE NW ST NW DESIGNED BY MAO
NO CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.

12/21/2018
1000 1000 TITLE

110TH AVENUE NW EXISTING 97"x152" 40TH STREET NW
RCP CULVERT EXISTING 97"X152
I(W)=984.96 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
RCP CULVERT LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
I(E)=983.61 I(N)=984.44 MAINLINE PLAN &
990 I(S)=983.99 990
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
987.68
987.66
987.64
987.62
987.60
987.58
987.56
987.54
987.52
987.50
987.48
987.46
987.44
987.42
987.40
987.38
987.36
987.34
987.32
987.30
987.28
987.26
987.24
987.22
987.20
987.7
987.7
993.7
988.1
987.7
987.7
986.4
987.5
987.5
987.7
987.6
987.6
987.5
987.3
987.1
986.8
986.7
986.9
986.7
986.8
986.4
986.3
986.5
986.5
986.5
970 81+00 80+00 79+00 78+00 77+00 76+00 75+00 74+00 73+00 72+00 71+00 70+00 69+00 68+00 67+00 66+00 65+00 64+00 63+00 62+00 61+00 60+00 59+00 58+00 57+00 970
10 OF 18
99
2
9
13
LEE, RUTH ANN
8
80 AC
13
995
7
13
6
13
993
992
135
992 992
134
133
9
132
2
131
991
130
129
128
127
0 200 400
126
BAUER, DIANNE M
125
99
994 80 AC SCALE IN FEET
124
2
123
2 ARY CTION
993
EXISTING DITCH CENTERLINE 12 PROFILE SCALES
L I M
PRE CONSTR
I N U
OR
1
OT F
12
N 10
120
999944
989
119
118
117
992 V
116 991 E
20
R
998990
5
T.
987
11
LEE, RUTH ANN
989
988
114
0 100 200
112
113
991
160 AC
111
110
109
2
108
99992
107
0
106
105
STATE OF MINNESOTA
104
SCALE IN FEET
989
98
103
992
102
101
41 AC
100
99
991
994
98
97
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
96
995
988
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
95
998
94
991
994
93
996
92
BAUER, DIANNE M 99 988 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
88
91
2 990
87
90
89
10.12 AC
0
99
86
9994
85
5
99
84
988
83
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
82
989
995
994
KANTEN, KENT & KIM REVOC LIV TRUST 996
993
DATE LIC. NO.

NOTE:
DIANNE M PROJECT
DIANNE M BAUER STATE OF MINNESOTA XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
BAUER XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NO CONSTRUCTION

EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DITCH No. 9
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
DATE DESCRIPTION BY

980 (2016 SURVEY) 980
988.20
988.18
988.16
988.14
988.12
988.10
988.08
988.06
988.04
988.02
988.00
987.98
987.96
987.94
987.92
987.90
987.88
987.86
987.84
987.82
987.80
987.78
987.76
987.74
987.72
987.8
988.3
988.3
988.3
988.2
988.2
988.0
987.2
988.1
987.7
987.6
987.3
987.6
987.6
987.9
987.8
986.3
985.4
985.9
988.1
987.0
987.2
987.6
987.6
988.0
970 107+00 106+00 105+00 104+00 103+00 102+00 101+00 100+00 99+00 98+00 97+00 96+00 95+00 94+00 93+00 92+00 91+00 90+00 89+00 88+00 87+00 86+00 85+00 84+00 83+00 970
RUTH ANN LEE DIANNE M BAUER DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000 TITLE

LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
MAINLINE PLAN &
990 990
PROFILE
(2016 SURVEY)
980 980
SHEET
988.72
988.70
988.68
988.66
988.64
988.62
988.60
988.58
988.56
988.54
988.52
988.50
988.48
988.46
988.44
988.42
988.40
988.38
988.36
988.34
988.32
988.30
988.28
988.26
988.24
989.6
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.5
989.4
988.8
988.8
989.0
988.5
988.4
988.1
988.0
988.2
988.0
988.1
988.1
988.2
988.2
988.1
987.6
987.7
970 133+00 132+00 131+00 130+00 129+00 128+00 127+00 126+00 125+00 124+00 123+00 122+00 121+00 120+00 119+00 118+00 117+00 116+00 115+00 114+00 113+00 112+00 111+00 110+00 109+00 970
11 OF 18
995
994
993
3
99
996
99998
SPOIL PLACEMENT
7
995 994 995
PHASE # 2 & 3
191
193
192
190
189
0
188
PHASE 3
187
2
MAT LOCATION
186
183
184
182
185
181
PHASE 2 & 3
180
1 79
ACCESS POINT
177
176
178
4
PUBLIC WATER BASIN

5.8
175
ID # 12009400
+0
0 200 400
=13
174
EP
173
996
990
SCALE IN FEET
172
992
991
N ARY CTION
1
I
PROFILE SCALESM
17
993 L I U
PRE CONSTR
9
993
995
0
W OR
17
N OT F 10
99
T N
2
ANGRIMSON, CRAIG, JAMES & JEFFREE
169
4 PHASE 2
99
85 AC ST
168
OLSON, LAWRENCE R & INA M 99
MAT LOCATION
T H V
993
50
167
0
80 AC 20 E
6
16
SPOIL PLACEMENT R
PHASE # 1 T.
5
16
999944
9
993 994 100
999922 1 0 100 200
4
99
991
16
PHASE 2
5
998
1
PHASE 1
ACCESS POINT 996
LEE, RUTH ANN 0
3
16
ACCESS POINT SCALE IN FEET
99 990 993
80 AC
2
3
16
161
160
991 PHASE 1
9
99
995
992
15
15
5
152
MAT LOCATION REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
3
15
151
15
992 992 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
4
99
EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. PHASE 1
150
15
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
INSTALL 157 5
149
ACCESS POINT CHARLES J. BRANDEL
156
99
148
TEMPORARY BERM ARMOR CULVERT
7
992
5
147
99
BOHM, JUDITH L 65 CY
146
992
145
998
144
80 AC 12-20-18 43359
143
995 DATE LIC. NO.
142
992
141
993
140
139
138
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
137
136
135
992
134
133
131
132
5
99
12
0T
DATE LIC. NO.
LEE, RUTH ANN
HA
99
2
VE
N
W
50TH ST NW NOTE: PROJECT
JUDITH L BOHM AND RUTH ANN LEE XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE RUTH ANN LEE
1010 120TH AVE NW 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
INTERSECTION OF
NO CONSTRUCTION
50TH STREET NW &
1000 ARMOR CULVERT 65 CY 120TH AVENUE NW
NOTE: 1000 JOINT COUNTY
EXISTING 84"
RCP ARCH CULVERT (2) START OPEN DITCH CONSTRUCTION
DITCH No. 9
I(N)=987.48 I(S)=987.15 LEGAL GRADE, TYP. CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
I(N)=987.51 I(S)=987.17
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980 980
989.24
989.22
989.20
989.18
989.16
989.14
989.12
989.10
989.08
989.06
989.04
989.02
989.00
988.98
988.96
988.94
988.92
988.90
988.88
988.86
988.84
988.82
988.80
988.78
988.76
989.3
989.4
987.0
997.8
988.3
989.8
989.5
990.8
990.8
990.7
990.6
990.5
990.5
990.4
990.3
990.2
990.1
990.1
989.8
989.8
989.8
989.8
989.8
989.5
989.6
970 159+00 158+00 157+00 156+00 155+00 154+00 153+00 152+00 151+00 150+00 149+00 148+00 147+00 146+00 145+00 144+00 143+00 142+00 141+00 140+00 139+00 138+00 137+00 136+00 135+00 970
LAWRENCE R & INA M OLSON JUDITH L BOHM DRAWN BY JAG

DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 1000 TITLE

MAINLINE PLAN &

990 990
PROFILE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
980 980
SHEET
989.76
989.74
989.72
989.70
989.68
989.66
989.64
989.62
989.60
989.58
989.56
989.54
989.52
989.50
989.48
989.46
989.44
989.42
989.40
989.38
989.36
989.34
989.32
989.30
989.28
991.6
991.6
991.6
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.5
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.4
991.0
990.5
990.2
990.1
990.0
989.9
989.8
989.8
989.7
970 185+00 184+00 183+00 182+00 181+00 180+00 179+00 178+00 177+00 176+00 175+00 174+00 173+00 172+00 171+00 170+00 169+00 168+00 167+00 166+00 165+00 164+00 163+00 162+00 161+00 970
12 OF 18
PHASE 4 ACCESS POINT
24 8 MOLDEN, VIRGENE & LINDA

247 INSTALL TEMPORARY 230 AC
8
993 995
994 997
DITCH FLOW
46 JOHNSON, DALE T
1
2 996
RESTRICTION
993
245
142.56 AC 1
243
10 000
244
00
242
994
INSTALL 99
9
241
TEMPORARY DITCH 99
8
995
FLOW RESTRICTION
240
99
7
239
99
6
TURN AROUND AREA
238
99
994
EXISTING 6'X12' 5 0 200 400
237
BOX CULVERT
994
994
I(N)=989.74 993
236
SCALE IN FEET
995
I(S)=989.16
235
99
i 99
ARY CTION
2
4
PROFILE SCALES
I M I N U
234
L
PRE CONSTR
225
226
227
228
233
PMBB FARM PARTNERSHIP, LLP
229
ARMOR CULVERT OR
230
231
232
OT F
224
PHASE 4 23 CY CLASS III RIPRAP N 10
160 AC
3
22
STATE OF MINNESOTA 993 991
EXISTING CENTERLINE
222
994
V
82.04 AC
221
993
20 E
992
3
99
R
0
991
22
100 T.
219
0
215
216
992 PUBLIC WATER BASIN 0 100 200
217
W 999
214
218
ET N 993
ID # 12009400
213
TRE
990
998
S 0
H SCALE IN FEET
212
9
990 99
60T
993
209
208
1
210
211
207
40 /
1
TH
206
205
997
204
992
202
991
201
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
992
995
200
997
995
19
998 997
W
8
19
EN
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
197
991
AV
196
EXISTING BRANCH 2
994
H
195
T
75.94 AC CENTERLINE 990
99
194
130
3
193
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
192
191
190
991
189
992
188
999965 993
DATE LIC. NO.
994
187
186
PROJECT
STATE OF MINNESOTA PMBB FARM PARTNERSHIP
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NO CONSTRUCTION NOTE:
1000 XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
980 980
990.28
990.26
990.24
990.22
990.20
990.18
990.16
990.14
990.12
990.10
990.08
990.06
990.04
990.02
990.00
989.98
989.96
989.94
989.92
989.90
989.88
989.86
989.84
989.82
989.80
990.3
990.4
990.4
990.3
990.7
990.7
990.8
990.9
990.9
991.0
991.1
991.1
991.2
991.3
991.3
991.4
991.5
991.5
991.6
991.7
991.8
991.7
991.7
991.7
991.7
970 211+00 210+00 209+00 208+00 207+00 206+00 205+00 204+00 203+00 202+00 201+00 200+00 199+00 198+00 197+00 196+00 195+00 194+00 193+00 192+00 191+00 190+00 189+00 188+00 187+00 970
NOTE:
VIRGENE & LINDA 60TH XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
DALE T JOHNSON STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAWN BY JAG
MOLDEN ST NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DESIGNED BY MAO
1010 1010 1010 REVIEWED BY CJB

60TH STREET NW
1000 1000 EXISTING 6'X12' 1000 TITLE
BOX CULVERT
ARMOR CULVERT I(N)=989.74 EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
I(S)=989.16 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
23 CY RIPRAP
MAINLINE PLAN &
990 990
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
990.80
990.78
990.76
990.74
990.72
990.70
990.68
990.66
990.64
990.62
990.60
990.58
990.56
990.54
990.52
990.50
990.48
990.46
990.44
990.42
990.40
990.38
990.36
990.34
990.32
991.2
991.0
990.6
990.7
990.9
991.3
991.6
991.4
991.3
991.1
991.5
991.4
989.9
990.9
990.3
990.9
991.2
991.0
991.3
990.9
991.0
990.5
990.3
990.6
990.6
970 237+00 236+00 235+00 234+00 233+00 232+00 231+00 230+00 229+00 228+00 227+00 226+00 225+00 224+00 223+00 222+00 221+00 220+00 219+00 218+00 217+00 216+00 215+00 214+00 213+00 970
13 OF 18
295
996
99
5
294
EXISTING 70th STREET
48" CMP CULVERT 3 ELEVATION = 999.30'
I(N)=994.41 29 ARMOR CULVERT 60 CY
I(S)=994.39 2 EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP.99
99 5
29 9
INSTALL TEMPORARY INSTALL 42LF 48" RCP
DITCH FLOW RESTRICTION 291 WEST I(N)= 991.87
PHASE 7 ACCESS POINT WEST I(S)= 991.86
994
290
995
289
996
288
998
5
99
996
W
JOHNSON, DALE T
287
E N
996
AV
286
WREMOVE EXISTING 48" 99
997
142.56 AC 0 200 400
TH
T N CMP CULVERT (WEST)
5
285
0
E
3
284
E
1
I(N)=993.46
TR
283
S 996 SCALE IN FEET
I(S)=993.65
282
TH ARY CTION
281
70 TURNAROUND AREA PHASE 6 PROFILE SCALES
I M I N U
280
L
PHASE 7 MAT LOCATIONS PRE CONSTR
279
OR
MAT LOCATIONS OT F 10
278
N
277
276
275
TURNAROUND AREA EXISTING CENTERLINE V
274
3
E
273
PHASES 5&6 ACCESS POINT 20
272
R
271
1
998
T.
270
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. 997 0 100 200
269
999945 SPOIL PLACEMENT PHASE #4
268
0
267
SCALE IN FEET
266
996
265
264
263
99
4 PHASE 5 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
99
262
5
MAT LOCATIONS STATE OF MINNESOTA.
261
995
SANDVEN, LEROY CHARLES J. BRANDEL
260
996
TURNAROUND AREA
160 AC
259
258
257
993 995 ARMOR CULVERT 559 CY
256
997 REMOVE EXISTING 66" 97 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
255
254
997 CMP CULVERT
253
252
996
I(W)=990.87 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
251
250
994 5 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I(E)=990.69 99
249
248
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
993 994 99
5
247
99
243
998
5
242
82.04 AC
246
241
24
245
995
240
99
4
3
239
INSTALL TEMPORARY
238
237
DITCH FLOW RESTRICTION INSTALL 42 LF 66" RCP DATE LIC. NO.
9 94 I(W)=990.94
I(E)=990.92 AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
996
PROJECT
130TH
LEROY SANDVEN STATE OF MINNESOTA DALE T JOHNSON
AVE NW
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NOTE:
ARMOR CULVERT 55 CY XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
1000 REMOVE EXISTING 66" 130TH AVENUE NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
CMP CULVERT INSTALL 42 LF 66" RCP
EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) I(W)=990.87 I(W)=990.94 DITCH No. 9
I(E)=990.69 I(E)=990.92
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
980 980
991.32
991.30
991.28
991.26
991.24
991.22
991.20
991.18
991.16
991.14
991.12
991.10
991.08
991.06
991.04
991.02
991.00
990.98
990.96
990.94
990.92
990.90
990.88
990.86
990.84
993.3
993.3
993.3
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.2
993.0
992.6
992.2
992.2
992.3
992.4
992.5
992.4
992.1
991.7
991.3
997.7
992.2
992.0
991.9
991.4
991.4
970 263+00 262+00 261+00 260+00 259+00 258+00 257+00 256+00 255+00 254+00 253+00 252+00 251+00 250+00 249+00 248+00 247+00 246+00 245+00 244+00 243+00 242+00 241+00 240+00 239+00 970
BERGEN D NOTE: CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES
70TH
& BESS LEROY SANDVEN XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG
ST NW XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE DESIGNED BY MAO
1010 JOHNSON 1010 REVIEWED BY CJB
EXISTING ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
48" CMP CULVERT 70TH -
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
I(N)=994.41 STREET NW INSTALL 42LF 48" RCP
I(S)=994.39 WEST I(N)= 991.87
1000 WEST I(S)= 991.86 1000 TITLE
MAINLINE PLAN &

990 REMOVE EXISTING 990
48" CMP CULVERT ARMOR CULVERT 60 CY LEGAL GRADE, TYP. PROFILE
I(N)=993.46
I(S)=993.65
980 980
SHEET
991.88
991.86
991.84
991.82
991.80
991.78
991.76
991.74
991.72
991.70
991.68
991.66
991.64
991.62
991.60
991.58
991.56
991.54
991.52
991.50
991.48
991.46
991.44
991.42
991.40
993.3
993.4
994.8
993.4
993.3
993.6
993.6
993.6
993.6
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.5
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.4
993.3
970 291+00 290+00 289+00 288+00 287+00 286+00 285+00 284+00 283+00 282+00 281+00 280+00 279+00 278+00 277+00 276+00 275+00 274+00 273+00 272+00 271+00 270+00 269+00 268+00 267+00 970
14 OF 18
1
SPOIL PLACEMENT
JOHNSON, THOMAS W PHASE # 10
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
120 AC
1000
999 999 1000
998 998
999
TURNAROUND AREA 998
PHASE 10
PHASE 9 & 10
MAT LOCATION 997
ACCESS POINT 0 200 400
996
338
339
337
336
340
335
341
331
332
334
SCALE IN FEET
330
333
342
329
328
343
327
344
JOHNSON, BERGEN D & BESS Y
326
345
ARY CTION
PROFILE SCALES
325
PHASE 9 L I M I N U
324
60 AC PRE CONSTR
323
PHASE 11 TURNAROUND AREA MAT LOCATION
322
OR
OT F
321
MAT LOCATION N 10
320
TURNAROUND AREA
319
997 996
318
317
EXISTING CENTERLINE
316
V
315
996
997
314
JOHNSON, ERIK E
313
JOHNSON, CONNIE PHASE 8 & 9 ACCESS POINT 20
312
R
311
20 AC PHASE # 8 & 9 PHASE 8 T.
310
1000
MAT LOCATION 0 100 200
309
996
308
307
2
995
99 0
306
8 PHASE 8 ACCESS POINT SCALE IN FEET
305
304
997
303
998
302
301
300
299
996 995 EXISTING
298
EXISTING POWER
297
48" CMP CULVERT STATE OF MINNESOTA.
296
I(N)=994.41 POLE, TYP.
14
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
295
997
996
99
0T
5
I(S)=994.39
294
H
AV
998
3
29
EN
998 ARMOR CULVERT 60 CY DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

W
995
JOHNSON, PAUL STAGE 8 ACCESS POINT REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
58 AC REMOVE EXISTING 48" 291 INSTALL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
CMP CULVERT (WEST) STATE OF MINNESOTA.
TEMPORARY BERM
994
I(N)=993.46
290
995
I(S)=993.65
289
288
5
99
996 INSTALL 42LF 48" RCP DATE LIC. NO.
287
WEST I(N)= 991.87
996 WEST I(S)= 991.86
286
99
285
NOTE: PROJECT
CONNIE JOHNSON PAUL JOHNSON BERGEN D & BESS JOHNSON XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
1010 1010
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
NOTE:
1000 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
980 980
992.70
992.66
992.62
992.58
992.54
992.50
992.46
992.42
992.38
992.34
992.30
992.26
992.22
992.18
992.14
992.10
992.08
992.06
992.04
992.02
992.00
991.98
991.96
991.94
991.92
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.3
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
994.2
993.7
993.8
994.0
994.6
994.6
994.5
994.2
994.0
970 317+00 316+00 315+00 314+00 313+00 312+00 311+00 310+00 309+00 308+00 307+00 306+00 305+00 304+00 303+00 302+00 301+00 300+00 299+00 298+00 297+00 296+00 295+00 294+00 293+00 970
THOMAS W JOHNSON ERIK JOHNSON CONNIE JOHNSON DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
1000 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) 1000 TITLE

MAINLINE PLAN &

990 990
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
993.74
993.70
993.66
993.62
993.58
993.54
993.50
993.46
993.42
993.38
993.34
993.30
993.26
993.22
993.18
993.14
993.10
993.06
993.02
992.98
992.94
992.90
992.86
992.82
992.78
994.3
994.3
994.2
994.1
994.6
994.0
994.1
994.1
994.0
994.0
993.7
994.2
994.5
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.4
994.3
994.3
970 343+00 342+00 341+00 340+00 339+00 338+00 337+00 336+00 335+00 334+00 333+00 332+00 331+00 330+00 329+00 328+00 327+00 326+00 325+00 324+00 323+00 322+00 321+00 320+00 319+00 970
15 OF 18
140TH AVE N
1002
2
1001
OYEN, MARTIN C
EXISTING BRANCH 1 CENTERLINE 1000
227.09 AC
1000
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL
99
6
243.92 AC 999
99
998
7
REMOVE EXISTING 36"
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CMP CULVERT
CMP CULVERT I(N)=997.05
I(N)=997.36 EXISTING TREE, TYP.
I(S)=996.87 PHASE 13
I(S)=996.33 0 200 400
1000
80TH STREET NW
361
362
364
363
368
367
366
365
369
371
360
370
391
381
359
392
390
389
388
394
393
387
386
384
372
396
395
385
383
382
397
380
379
373
398
378
377
376
374
375
SCALE IN FEET
8 PHASE 12 MAT LOCATION
35
998
PROPOSED 36" RCP SPOIL PLACEMENT PHASES ARY CTION
999 I(N)=996.80
PROPOSED 36" RCP
I(N)=996.30 35
7 99
8 999
11,12, & 13 PROFILE SCALES
L I M
PRE CONSTR
I N U
I(S)=996.78 OR
12
6 10
1000
I(S)=996.28 35 997
00
100 N OT F 10
1
5 TURNAROUND AREA
10 EXISTING POWER POLE, TYP.
35 02
JOHNSON, THOMAS W 35
4 V
160 AC
11
3
997
20 E
EXISTING CENTERLINE 35 R
T.
2
10
35
999 00
10
01 0 100 200
998
1
5
35
THOMAS W & DOROTHY 140TH JOHNSON, THOMAS W 0
THOMAS W JOHNSON
0
SCALE IN FEET
35
JOHNSON AVE NW 120 AC
1010 1010
9
34
REMOVE & REPLACE WITH 42 LF OF 36" RCP CULVERTIREPORT
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
998
(4) WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
EXISTING 36" CMP CULVERT (4)
348 (2) I(W)=994.89, I(E)=994.88 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
140TH AVENUE NW
I(W)=996.02, I(E)=996.16
I(W)=995.70, I(E)=995.72
JOHNSON, THOMAS W & DOROTHY ARMOR CULVERT 75 CY (2) I(W)=993.89, I(E)=993.88 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I(W)=995.76, I(E)=995.50 160 AC 347 100

1000 1000 INSTALL TEMPORARY BERM
6
I(W)=996.62, I(E)=996.26 PHASE 11
34
99
ARMOR CULVERT 75 CY MAT LOCATION 9
345
99
EXISTING 36" CMP CULVERT (4) 8
99
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
344
9
I(W)=996.02, I(E)=996.16 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
101000 I(W)=995.70, I(E)=995.72
343
990 REMOVE & REPLACE WITH 42 LF OF 990 00 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
I(W)=995.76, I(E)=995.50 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
34 2
36" RCP CULVERT (4)
997
(2) I(W)=994.19, I(E)=993.88 I(W)=996.62, I(E)=996.26
341
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
(2) I(W)=993.90, I(E)=993.88
340
339
980 980
8
33 DATE LIC. NO.
993.98
993.94
993.90
993.86
993.82
993.78
994.8
994.9
995.2
994.5
994.5
994.4

349+00 348+00 347+00 346+00 345+00 344+00 6
970 970 3
PROJECT
THOMAS W & DOROTHY JOHNSON
1010 1010
EXISTING 36"
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
EXISTING 36"
CMP CULVERT NOTE:
CMP CULVERT
I(N)=997.05 XXX.X - EXISTING DITCH GRADE
1000
I(N)=997.36
I(S)=996.33
I(S)=996.87 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY) EXISTING CENTERLINE
GRADE, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1000 JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
980 980
996.34
996.30
996.26
996.22
996.18
996.05
995.92
995.79
995.66
995.53
995.40
995.27
995.14
995.01
994.88
994.75
994.62
994.49
994.36
994.23
994.10
994.06
994.02
993.98
993.94
998.6
995.4
994.9
996.5
996.5
996.4
996.3
996.3
996.2
996.1
996.1
996.0
996.0
995.9
995.9
995.8
995.7
995.6
995.5
995.5
995.4
995.4
994.8
994.8
994.9
970 372+00 371+00 370+00 369+00 368+00 367+00 366+00 365+00 364+00 363+00 362+00 361+00 360+00 359+00 358+00 357+00 356+00 355+00 354+00 353+00 352+00 351+00 350+00 349+00 348+00 970
THOMAS W JOHNSON THOMAS W &XXX.X

DOROTHY
- EXISTINGJOHNSON
DITCH GRADE DRAWN BY JAG

1000 1000 TITLE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP. MAINLINE PLAN &

990 990
PROFILE
980 980
SHEET
997.38
997.34
997.30
997.26
997.22
997.18
997.14
997.10
997.06
997.02
996.98
996.94
996.90
996.86
996.82
996.78
996.74
996.70
996.66
996.62
996.58
996.54
996.50
996.46
996.42
998.5
998.4
998.4
998.3
998.3
998.2
998.2
998.2
998.1
998.1
998.0
998.0
997.9
997.9
997.9
997.8
997.8
997.7
997.7
997.6
997.7
997.7
997.7
997.6
998.2
970 398+00 397+00 396+00 395+00 394+00 393+00 392+00 391+00 390+00 389+00 388+00 387+00 386+00 385+00 384+00 383+00 382+00 381+00 380+00 379+00 378+00 377+00 376+00 375+00 374+00 970
16 OF 18
0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
32
10 04
03
31
1002
10 01
00
30
29
PROFILE SCALES
ARY CTION
28
I M I N
L
PRE CONST RU
R 10
NO T FO
27
V
20 E
R
26 T.
0 100 200
0
25 SCALE IN FEET

KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
24
243.92 AC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
23
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
22
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
21
INSTALL 40 LF OF 36" RCP CULVERT 20
(N)=996.80, I(S)=996.78 DATE LIC. NO.
(N)=996.30, I(S)=996.28
04
11000023
1
999
10
ARMOR WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
1
1000
5
19
100
CULVERTS
1002
2
997
00
0
10
63 CY RIPRAP 1002 10 PROJECT

04
10
3
03
18
4
REMOVE EXISTING 36" CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

CMP CULVERT (2) 100
17
5
1
I(N)=997.36, I(S)=996.33
I(N)=997.05, I(S)=996.87
6
JOINT COUNTY
16
1000
7
EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. DITCH No. 9
15
1001
8
10
04 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT COUNTY MINNESOTA
1002
14
EXISTING MAINLINE REVISION SCHEDULE
9
CENTERLINE 100
13 DATE DESCRIPTION BY
3 EXISTING BRANCH 1 MAINLINE
OYEN, MARTIN C
10
1
1100 100
100 0010
997
227.09 AC
12
1 1909098
11
2
100 100
2

80TH (W) LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES BR.1 & 2
DRAWN BY JAG
NW (E) MARTIN C OYEN DESIGNED BY MAO
REMOVE EXISTING 36"
NOTE:
CMP CULVERT (2) CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
I(N)=997.36, I(S)=996.33
1010 XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1010
I(N)=997.05, I(S)=996.87 TITLE
ARMOR CULVERTS
INSTALL 40 LF OF 36" RCP CULVERT EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
(N)=996.80, I(S)=996.78 LEGAL GRADE, TYP. BRANCH 1 PLAN &
1000 (N)=996.30, I(S)=996.28 1000
PROFILE
990 990
SHEET
996.16
996.39
996.49
996.54
996.59
996.64
996.69
996.74
996.79
996.84
996.89
996.94
996.99
997.04
997.09
997.14
997.19
997.24
997.29
997.34
997.39
997.44
997.49
997.54
997.59
996.5
996.0
996.7
996.4
996.1
996.2
996.5
996.9
997.1
997.3
997.4
996.8
996.7
997.1
997.2
997.1
996.8
996.6
996.4
996.5
997.2
997.2
997.0
997.4
997.2
980 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 980 17 OF 18
53
43
42
1005
44
52
45
46
47
51
50
48
1005
49
4 1003
1002
100
41
1002
MEAGHER, CAROL & PATRICK 1006 1007 END BRANCH 1 CONSTRUCTION
73.95 AC
40
39
0 100 200
38 EXISTING BRANCH 1 MAINLINE SCALE IN FEET
37
PROFILE
L I M I SCALES
N ARY CTION
RU
PRE CONST
R 10
NO T FO
V
36 20 E
R
T.
1003
999
0 100 200
35
1004
0
100
SCALE IN FEET

EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP. STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
33
100
1004 5
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

1003
01
00
1002
03
04

10
10

OYEN, MARTIN C PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
227.09 AC
31
DATE LIC. NO.
KITTELSON, LESLIE & RUDEL THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC.
243.92 AC AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
30
(N) LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON PROJECT
(S) MARTIN C OYEN

1020 1020
29 CHIPPEWA & SWIFT

28 EXISTING TOP, TYP. (2016 SURVEY)
DITCH No. 9
27

DATE DESCRIPTION BY
26
25
990 990
24
998.84
998.89
998.94
998.99
999.04
1001.8
1002.0
1002.3
1002.4
1002.0
980 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 980
23 PROJECT NO. 15-18675
(W) LESLIE & RUDELL
(W) CAROL & PATRICK MEAGHER (N) LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON CAD FILE NAME 18675 PROFILES BR.1 & 2
KITTLESON LESLIE & RUDELL KITTLESON DRAWN BY JAG
(E) MARTIN C OYEN (S) MARTIN C OYEN
1020 (E) MARTIN C OYEN
DESIGNED BY MAO
1020 REVIEWED BY CJB
NOTE: CLIENT PROJECT NO. -
1010 XXX.XX - LEGAL DITCH GRADE 1010 TITLE
BRANCH 1 PLAN &
1000 1000
PROFILE
LEGAL GRADE, TYP.
990 990
SHEET
997.69
997.74
997.79
997.84
997.89
997.94
997.99
998.04
998.09
998.14
998.19
998.24
998.29
998.34
998.39
998.44
998.49
998.54
998.59
998.64
998.69
998.74
998.79
998.84
998.89
1000.5
1001.1
1001.2
1001.3
1001.5
1001.8
1001.7
1001.7
1001.8
1002.0
997.4
997.6
997.8
997.8
997.7
997.9
998.0
998.1
998.3
998.4
998.5
999.2
999.9
999.7
999.5
980 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 980
18 OF 18
Attachment 4: Project Impact Maps
Attachment 4:
Project Impact Maps

10
V
U 80th St NW
Existing 2-Year Max

Flood Boundary
Repair Alternative 2-Year

Max Flood Boundary
34 Edison
36
35
3 2 1
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 G IS\Maps\WCA Maps\18675 Project Impact Map 1-1.mxd
10 11 12
Kragero
15 14 13 WETLAND IMPACTS EXCAVATION TEMPORARY DRAINAGE

TOTAL ACRES= 5.11 7.75 18.3
22 23 24
Legend
µ
Project Impacts Map Existing Ditch Top PN: 15-18675
Joint County Ditch No 9 Proposed Ditch Top
Source:

Temporary Impacts Tile/Ditch (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Minnesota Repair Alternaitve 2-Year Parcels (XX County, 12/16/2016)

0 125 250 500
Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Existing 2-Year Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
JCD 9 Open Ditch Counties (MN DNR, July 2013)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
74
V
U
140th Ave NW
Existing 2-Year Max

Flood Boundary
13
U
V 70th St NW

Max Flood Boundary
140th Ave NW
35 36Bank
Edison 31
West
2 1 6
Kragero
11 12 7
18
14 13 BIg
Bend WETLAND IMPACTS EXCAVATION TEMPORARY DRAINAGE
TOTAL ACRES= 5.11 7.75 18.3
23 24 19
Legend
µ
Source:

Repair Alternaitve 2-Year
Minnesota
0 125 250 500
Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)
Existing 2-Year
Feet
Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
130th Ave NW

Max Flood Boundary
75
V
U
60th St NW
ß 40
ª
M I NNESO T A
60th St NW
75
V
U
130th Ave NW
Existing 2-Year Max

Flood Boundary
2 1 6 5
7 8
12
11
14
13 18 17
Kragero BIg Bend
24 19 20
23
26 WETLAND IMPACTS EXCAVATION TEMPORARY DRAINAGE
25 30 29 TOTAL ACRES= 5.11 7.75 18.3
Legend
µ
Source:


0 125 250 500
Tuesday, December 18, 2018 Existing 2-Year Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
120th Ave NW
77
U
V
50th St NW 18
V
U 18
V
U 50th St NW
77
U
V
No Construction Planned
120th Ave NW

Max Flood Boundary
Existing 2-Year Max

Flood Boundary
13 18 17 16
24 21
19 20
BIg Bend
25 28
30 29
36 33
31 32
Kragero WETLAND IMPACTS EXCAVATION TEMPORARY DRAINAGE
1 6 Tunsberg 5 4
TOTAL ACRES= 5.11 7.75 18.3
Legend
µ
Source:


0 125 250 500
Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)
Existing 2-Year
Feet
Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
110th Ave NW
40th St NW 12
"
) 40th St NW
34
)
"

Max Flood Boundary
Existing 2-Year Max

Flood Boundary
110th Ave NW
19 22
20 21
BIg Bend
27
29 28
30
31
32 33 34
6 Tunsberg WETLAND IMPACTS EXCAVATION TEMPORARY DRAINAGE
5 3
4 TOTAL ACRES= 5.11 7.75 18.3
8 Legend
µ
Source:


0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
100th Ave NW
18
V
U
40th St NW 12
)
" 40th St NW 40th St NW
Existing 2-Year Max

Flood Boundary
6
5 9

Max Flood Boundary
100th Ave NW
20 21 22 23 30th St NW
23
V
U 30th St NW V
U
29 28 27
BIg Bend
32 33 34
100th Ave NW
5 4 3
Tunsberg 2 WETLAND IMPACTS EXCAVATION TEMPORARY DRAINAGE
8 9
10 11
TOTAL ACRES= 5.11 7.75 18.3
Legend
µ
Source:


0 125 250 500
PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
Addendum #1
Chippewa JCD 9 Wetland Application
To: BWSR, Chippewa TEP

From: ISG, Chippewa and Swift Joint County Drainage Authority
Date: November 10, 2020
Subject: Addendum to Chippewa Joint County Ditch (JCD) 9 Wetland Application
cc: MnDNR, USCOE
Introduction
A WCA application for the Chippewa JCD 9 ditch repair project was submitted in December of 2018 and approved in June of 2019.
This project includes cleaning approximately 22,500 feet of public open ditch through several wetland complexes and replacing
culverts along 3 road crossings to restore a portion of the legal drainage conditions of JCD 9. The permitted project included filling
0.085-acres within the wetlands for erosion control along the roadways to be repaired. Mitigation for 0.17-acres (at 2:1 ratio) was
provided for the project and was included in the original approved application.
Throughout the course of the repair project under 103E, a Reestablishment of Records was completed for JCD 9 in 2017 and
approved by the Drainage Authority. The DNR appealed the decision, which proceeded to the supreme court. In September of
2019, a settlement agreement between the DNR and Drainage Authority was made to include a head-cut structure with the repair
to prevent the potential drain out of the DNR Public Water Basin along the mainline open ditch.
Project Update
Over the past 8-months, the DNR, Drainage Authority, and ISG have worked together on a design for a head-cut structure along
the JCD 9 mainline in Section 19 of Big Bend Township. The structure includes installing hog slats across the open ditch along
with rip rap to prevent erosion and control the bottom elevation of the ditch from downcutting. The elevation of the structure is
designed to be set at the same existing elevation of the ditch centerline, thus not changing the overall draw down or hydrology of
the ditch/wetland from the approved WCA application. The overall impacts from the fill to construct the structure is 1,010 square
feet in the open ditch and adjacent wetlands. Of that, 330 square feet has already been permitted under the drainage exemption
application. Therefore 680 square feet of additional wetland impacts are associated with the construction of the head-cut
structure.
Also included in the updated design is to clean an additional 2,200 feet of ditch through the DNR Basin and downstream of State
Highway 40 to allow better conveyance through the wetlands up to the head-cut structure. This additional ditch cleaning includes
0.40-acres of excavation/cleaning of the ditch back to legal grade and 1.35-acres of temporary impacts for access with
construction mats. There are no additional drainage impacts above what has already been permitted as the head-cut structure
will be set at the same elevation and with the same hydraulic capacity as the cleaning specified in the original application.
Wetland Permit Addendum

The additional repairs to the JCD 9 project require an addendum to the original application for the additional scope of work and
impacts to the wetlands to construct the head-cut structure. This includes an additional 0.03 acres of wetland mitigation for the
impacts to wetlands from the head cut structure. The purchase agreement has been updated to include 0.20 acres of mitigation
for the entire project. An additional Minnesota WCA Joint Application Form is included and will be used for the addendum for
record keeping and as a submittal for the U.S. Army Corps Section 404 Permitting.
An updated repair map and construction plans are attached for reference.
115 East Hickory Street + Suite 300 + Mankato, MN 56001

507.387.6651 + ISGInc.com
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
Addendum #1
Chippewa JCD 9 Wetland Application
Please feel free to contact me at 507-387-6651 or at mark.origer@isginc.com.
Sincerely,
Mark Origer, PE
Civil Engineer
Page 2 of 2
952.426.0699 + ISGInc.com
Project Name and/or Number: 18675 Chippewa and Swift JCD 9- Addendum#1
PART ONE: Applicant Information

If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the
applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s
contact information must also be provided.
Applicant/Landowner Name: Chippewa and Swift Joint County Drainage Authority (Michelle May)
Mailing Address: 629 North Eleventh Street, Montevideo MN 56265
Phone: 320-269-7447
E-mail Address: mmay@co.chippewa.mn.us
Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above):

Mailing Address:
Phone:
E-mail Address:
Agent Name: Chuck Brandel, ISG

Mailing Address: 115 E Hickory St #300, Mankato, MN 56001
Phone: 507-387-6651
E-mail Address: chuck.brandel@is-grp.com
PART TWO: Site Location Information

County: Chippewa City/Township: Big Bend Townships
Parcel ID and/or Address:
Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Section 19 (Big Bend Township)
Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45.1004o N, -95.8399o W
Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways.
Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): ~680 square feet (structure)
~2,200 linear feet (ditch cleaning)
If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names
and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your
application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at:
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf
PART THREE: General Project/Site Information

If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other
correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number.
Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The
project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements
that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing
the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts.
Chippewa and Swift Joint County Ditch Number 9 (JCD 9) is a public drainage system which serves a watershed area of approximately
17,200 acres located in Big Bend and Kragero Townships in Chippewa County and Edison Township in Swift County. Previous
permitting approved the repairs to the public ditch system through wetland complexes with mitigation required for placing rip rap
at roadway culverts. Additional repairs to the project have been added through a settlement agreement between the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Chippewa and Swift Joint Drainage Authority. These repairs include cleaning 2,200
linear feet of the JCD 9 mainline open ditch through the DNR Public Water Basin 12009400 and the installation of a head-cut
structure along the ditch alignment to prevent a full drain out of the Basin. The head-cut structure is proposed to be installed along
the mainline open ditch downstream of the Basin’s two overflow outlets located in the east half of Section 19 in Big Bend Township.
Attachment A-(Not Applicable)

Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or
Jurisdictional Determination
By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District
(Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply):
Wetland Type Confirmation
Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU
concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation
concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address
the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area
(including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.).
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication
from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of
computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all
waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be
appealed.
Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that
jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the
affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process.
In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for
Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013).
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx
Attachment B
Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss
Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation
Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland
replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either
exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCA jurisdiction.
Identify the specific exemption or no-loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies:
8420.0420 EXEMPTION STANDARDS. Subp. 3. Public drainage system. A replacement plan is not required for: (2) impacts
resulting from maintenance or repair of existing drainage systems other than public drainage systems, when the
maintenance or repair does not drain wetlands that have existed for more than 25 years before the proposed impact.
Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments
and exhibits that support your contention. Applicants should refer to rules (e.g. WCA rules), guidance documents (e.g. BWSR
guidance, Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions (e.g. Corps General Permit conditions) to determine the
necessary information to support the application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project
Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide:
The 2,200 linear feet of open ditch cleaning is regular maintenance of public drainage systems and will follow the requirements
as identified in the original wetland application. No changes in hydrologic conditions are anticipated with the cleaning and
inclusion of the head-cut structure. Therefore, it is requested that no mitigation be required for this repair action.
The construction of the head-cut structure includes installing concrete hog slats placed on top of compacted clay within the open
ditch. Rip rap will be placed on both the upstream and downstream sides of the structure to funnel the flow across the hog slats
to prevent erosion and ditch meandering. The slats will also be keyed into to adjacent ground on both sides to further protect
the structure from erosion and channel migration.
Construction of the structure includes excavating 45 CY of material out of the ditch/wetland to create a solid clay base to install
the hog slats. 57 CY of fill will be hauled in and keyed into the existing ground adjacent of the open ditch. Of the fill, 40 CY will be
placed outside of the ditch and 17 CY of additional material is needed to connect the structure into the existing ground.
Construction plans for the head cut structure are included in the attachments.
The overall impacts from the fill to construct the structure is 1,010 square feet in the open ditch and adjacent wetlands. Of that,
330 square feet has already been permitted under the drainage exemption application. Therefore only 680 square feet of impacts
to the wetland complex are associated with this application.
Project Name and/or Number: 18675 Chippewa and Swift JCD 9-Addendum#1
Attachment C
Avoidance and Minimization
Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a
description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management,
and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings,
roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management
plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary:
The purpose of the project is to comply with the settlement agreement between the Chippewa and Swift Joint Drainage
Authority and the MN Department of Natural Resources. The need of the head-cut structure is to prevent negative impacts and
a complete draw down of the Public Waters Basin along the JCD 9 drainage system. The designed structure is the minimally
invasive alternative to meet the agreement while protecting the Public Waters Basin and adjacent wetland areas.
Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist.
Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives
that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or
not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged
to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis:
Avoidance of impacts to aquatic resources is not a feasible option given the alignment of the legal ditch channel and its function
in protecting the Public Waters Basin. Impacts to the wetlands are necessary for the construction of the head-cut structure.
Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest
extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water
resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4):
The selected location for the head-cut structure provides the least amount of impacts to wetlands. At this location, the least
amount of fill is required to maintain the existing elevation of the runout of the Public Waters Basin. Other locations were
identified downstream of this location; however, the construction impact in those locations would be much greater to achieve
the same function as it is currently designed.
Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will
require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be required
to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided
during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants
with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager.
Offsite alternatives were not considered as feasible options due to the location of the ditch in relation to the Public Waters
Basin. The structure must be placed within the channel, which is within the wetland complex, in order to achieve the project
purpose.
Attachment D
Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation
Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road
wetland replacement program. Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements.
Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an
existing wetland bank (with an account number in the State wetland banking system) for all or part of your
replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements.
Bank
Wetland Bank Major Credit Type
County Service Number of Credits
Account # Watershed # (if applicable)
Area #
1636 Lyon 25 9 0.20
Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at
least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project. This documentation could be a signed purchase
agreement, signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the
applicant and the bank owner. However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the
mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU.
Attachment E-(Not Applicable)

Local Road Replacement Program Qualification
Complete this part if you are a local road authority (county highway department, city transportation department, etc.) seeking
verification that your project (or a portion of your project) qualifies for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement
Program (LGRWRP). If portions of your project are not eligible for the LGRWRP, then Attachment D should be completed and
attached to your application.
Discuss how your project is a repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable road to meet
state/federal design or safety standards/requirements. Applicants should identify the specific road deficiencies and how the
project will rectify them. Attach supporting documents and information as applicable:
Provide a map, plan, and/or aerial photograph accurately depicting wetland boundaries within the project area. Attach associated
delineation/determination report or otherwise explain the method(s) used to identify and delineate wetlands. Also attach and
discuss any type of review or approval of wetland boundaries or other aspects of the project by a member or members of the local
Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) or Corps of Engineers:
In the table below, identify only the wetland impacts from Part 4 that the road authority has determined should qualify for the
LGRWRP.
Wetland Impact ID Type of Impact Size of Impact County, Major Watershed #,

Existing Plant Community
(as noted on (fill, excavate, (square feet or and Bank Service Area # of
Type(s) in Impact Area1
overhead view) drain) acres to 0.01) Impact2
1Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2.
2Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7.
Discuss the feasibility of providing onsite compensatory mitigation/replacement for important site-specific wetland functions:
Please note that under the MN Wetland Conservation Act, projects with less than 10,000 square feet of wetland impact are
allowed to commence prior to submission of this notification so long as the notification is submitted within 30 days of the impact.
The Clean Water Act has no such provision and requires that permits be obtained prior to any regulated discharges into water of
the United States. To avoid potential unauthorized activities, road authorities must, at a minimum, provide a complete application
to the Corps and receive a permit prior to commencing work.
By signature below, the road authority attests that they have followed the process in MN Rules 8420.0544 and have determined
that the wetland impacts identified in Part 4 are eligible for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program.
Project Name and/or Number: 18675 Chippewa and Swift JCD 9 Addendum#1
Road Authority Representative: Title:
Signature: Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Upon approval and signature by the TEP, application must be sent to: Wetland Bank Administration
Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources
520 Lafayette Road North
Saint Paul, MN 55155
130th Ave NW
13 18 17
120th Ave NW
75
U
V 77
U
V
60th St NW
40 60th St NW
ß
ª
M I NN E SO T A
60th St NW
No Construction
Additional Ditch
Cleaning
JCD 9 Watershed
Area=17,209 Acres
Chippewa
County
Kragero BIg Bend
MN DNR
PWI Basin
120th Ave NW
20
130th Ave NW
24 19
!
.
Head Cut Structure
77
V
U
75
V
U
Cleaning Through
Wetland Areas
18 50th St NW 18
V
U 50th St NW
U
V
77
V
U
75
V
U
Steve ns
S:\Projects\18000 PRO J\18600-18699\18675 Chippewa & Swift Joint County Ditch No. 9 -Montevideo MN\18675 Civil\18675 GIS\Maps\Repair Report Maps\18675 JCD 9 Repair O verview Map-DNR Update.mxd
Po pe
Cleaning Along
County County
Swift
Swift
Roadways
County County
Big Stone
Co unty
County
Swift
Swift
120th Ave NW
130th Ave NW
County
25 30 29
Swift
Co unty
Ch Chippewa
C i County
La
pp nty Co u
cQ
ew
ou ar le
ui
a
P
Chippewa
n ty
County
Lac Qui
Parle County
Yellow M edicine
Legend
µ
County
Repair Updates Map JCD 9 Watershed Additional Cleaning From Permit App
PN: 15-18675
Source:
Joint County Ditch No 9 Public Waters Basins No Orthophotograph (MnGeo WMS, 2015)
Chippewa and Swift County, Townships Tile/Ditch (XX County, 12/16/2016)

Yes Parcels (XX County, 12/16/2016)
Minnesota Sections 0 175 350 700

Standard Cleaning Feet Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)
Monday, August 10, 2020 No Construction 1 inch = 700 feet Major Stream (MN DNR, July 2008)
!
. Head Cut Structure Counties (MN DNR, July 2013)
Clean & Remove Spoils PLSS (MnGeo/USGS)
---- ---- 6
M I NARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
R
NO T FO

STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359

CROSS SECTION VIEW HOG SLAT STRUCTURE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.

PROJECT
PLAN VIEW HOG SLAT STRUCTURE

CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY

FILE NAME 18675-DNR STRUCTURE DETAIL
DRAWN BY ---
DESIGNED BY ---
REVIEWED BY ---
PROFILE VIEW HOG SLAT STRUCTURE ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 12/21/2018
TITLE
DNR STRUCTURE
DETAILS
· SHEET
·
6 DNR STRUCTURE DETAILS
6 OF 25
---- ---- 20
991
991
M I NARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
OR
N OT F
990
991
KEY IN HOG SLATS
21'
PLACE 34 CY CLASS III RIPRAP ON MNDOT 21'
TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 2+00
1+50
1+00
991
0+00 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
KEY IN HOG SLATS
3 - 4'x10' HOG SLATS
TOP ELEVATION: 991.70 DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
PROPOSED CONTOUR, TYP. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
991
990
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
991
992
992
DATE LIC. NO.

991
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
990
990
MINNESOTA
992
991
991 REVISION SCHEDULE
SCALE IN FEET
993
HEAD CUT 1 XS
995 CLASS III RIPRAP ELEVATION=991.70 995
FILE NAME 18675-PROF BR 1 & 2-DNR STRUCT
DRAWN BY JAG
KEY IN HOG SLATS KEY IN HOG SLATS DESIGNED BY MAO
990 1.5" CRUSHED ROCK 990 REVIEWED BY CJB
EXISTING SURFACE
(INCIDENTAL TO HOG ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
12/21/2018
SLAT PLACEMENT) COMPACTED CLAY CLIENT PROJECT NO.-
LEGAL DITCH
GEOMETRY
985 985 TITLE
LEGAL DITCH
ELEVATION=989.67

975 975
SHEET
991.70
20
989.7
970 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30 1+40 1+50 1+60 1+70 1+80 1+90 2+00 2+10 2+20 970 OF 25
20 DNR BASIN PROFILE
---- ---- 21
993
PLACE 34 CY CLASS III RIPRAP ON MNDOT EXISTING CONTOUR, TYP.

TYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
992
991
M I N ARY CTION
LI U
PRE CONSTR
R
991
NO T FO
KEY IN HOG SLATS
991 992
992
990
991
990
990
990 991
3 - 4'x10' HOG SLATS 991 991 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
TOP ELEVATION: 991.70
CHARLES J. BRANDEL
992
991 KEY IN HOG SLATS
991
DATE 12-20-18 LIC. NO. 43359
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1
99
DATE LIC. NO.
992
992
PROJECT
CHIPPEWA & SWIFT
JOINT COUNTY
DITCH No. 9
MINNESOTA
REVISION SCHEDULE
SCALE IN FEET
1000 HEAD CUT 1 PROF 1000

ELEVATION=991.70
995 1.5" CRUSHED ROCK PROPOSED GRADING TOP OF WATERWAY 995
(INCIDENTAL TO HOG FOR HOG SLAT PROJECT NO. 15-18675
SLAT PLACEMENT) STRUCURE FILE NAME 18675-PROF BR 1 & 2-DNR STRUCT
DRAWN BY JAG
DESIGNED BY MAO
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
12/21/2018
EXISTING SURFACE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.-
LEGAL DITCH
985 ELEVATION=989.67 COMPACTED CLAY 985 TITLE

975 975
SHEET
990.36
991.70
991.30
990.30
21
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.7
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
989.6
970 2+30 2+20 2+10 2+00 1+90 1+80 1+70 1+60 1+50 1+40 1+30 1+20 1+10 1+00 0+90 0+80 0+70 0+60 0+50 0+40 0+30 0+20 0+10 970 21 DNR BASIN PROFILE
OF 25

Chippewa JCD 9 Repair Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chippewa JCD 9 Repair Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Petitioned Repair Report

Joint County Ditch No. 9

ISG Project No.: 15-18675

REPORT FOR: FROM:

Signature: ____ ____

Printed Name: Chuck Brandel, PE

License Number: 43359

Joint County Ditch No. 9

Engineer's Project Number: 15-18675

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page i

Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page ii

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 1 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 2 of 29

Investigation of External Sources of Funding and Technical Assistance

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 3 of 29

Sediment Deposition + Vegetation Growth

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 4 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 5 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 6 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 7 of 29

Figure 7: 80th Street NW Inundated During Low Flow

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 8 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 9 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 10 of 29

Figure 11: State Highway 40 Flooding in Road ROW

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 11 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 12 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 13 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 14 of 29

4 130th Ave NW ARC H C ULVERT C MP 66 990.87 990.69 -0.06 Fair

50th St & 120th

Repair Project Components

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 15 of 29

Clean and Remove Spoils

Clean and Remove Spoils with Construction Mats

Tile Outlet Repair

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 16 of 29

Table 2: Proposed Culvert Replacement

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 17 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 18 of 29

HEAD CUT STRUCTURE

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 19 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 20 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 21 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 22 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 23 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 24 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 25 of 29

Table 3: Peak Flow Rate Comparison For 2D Model Simulations

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 26 of 29

PUBLIC UTILITY, BENEFIT, OR WELFARE

REPAIR COST ESTIMATE - SUMMARY

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 27 of 29

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, + RECOMMENDATIONS

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 28 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 29 of 29

Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix A

UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC

STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) REVIEWED BY CJB

CLIENT PROJECT NO.

WATER SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE

Signature: