Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

PT.
TRIPATRA ENGINEERING
CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT Attaka Power De-Bottleneck & Expansion (WO # 013) DATE 17-Mar-21
SUBJECT Deck Detail Design Attaka " B " platform JOB NO. 2542
BY CHY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY SHEET OF
C.2 PADEYE, SLING & SHACKLE DESIGN OF DECK EXTENSION ATTAKA " B "
PLATFORM
SLING DESIGN
The selection of sling type to be used for lifting is based on its breaking strength capacity, given by sling's
manufacturer. Force data from SACS output is compared with this capacity, with considering the requirement of
API RP-2A section 2.4.2f., which
Forces
Maximum Sling Force = 2.921 kips ( without load factor)
Design Axial Force ( P ) = 4 x 2.9 = 11.7 kips
= 5.3 tons
Selection of Sling Type

The characteristic of sling to be used for this deck extension module lifting is as follows:
Diameter = 6/8 in
Minimum Breaking Strength = 6.56 tons (Bright, I.W.R.C.)
SHACKLE DESIGN
Similar with sling, the shackle is selected based on its manufacturer's rated working load with minimum safety
factor of 3, according to the requirement in API RP-2A section 2.4.2f.
Forces
Maximum Sling Force = 2.9 kips
Design Axial Force ( P ) = 3 x 2.9 = 8.8 kips
= 4.0 tons
Selection of Shackle Type

The type of shackle to be used for this deck extension module lifting is as follows:
Type = G-210 S-215

Safe Working Load = 4.75 tons
Pin Diameter = 0.88 in
PADEYE DESIGN
This padeye is intended to have the capability in resisting the lift forces of deck module during lifting operation.
The design include horizontal force of 5% of static sling force and dynamic factor of 2.0 according to the API RP 2
A requirement in secti
Forces
Maximum Sling Force = 2.9 kips
Design Axial Force (P) = 2 x 2.9 = 5.8 kips = 2.921 short ton
PT. TRIPATRA ENGINEERING
CALCULATION SHEET
Design Lateral Force ( PL ) = 5% x 5.8 = 0.3 kips = 0.15 short ton
Padeye Properties
Fy = 36 ksi
Fu = 58 ksi
Pin -----> diameter ( dp ) = 0.88 in
hole diameter ( dh ) = 0.875 + 1/8 = 1 in
hole radius ( rh ) = 1/2 = 0.5 in
Main Plate -----> thick. ( tm ) = 0.50 in
Determination of Main Plate

- Allowable Shear Stress : FV = 0.4 x Fy
= 14.4 ksi
- Try to use : Main Plate radius ( rm ) = 1.50 in
Shear Stress Check

- Shear Capacity : FV-c = 2 x ( rm - rh ) x tm x FV
= 2 x ( 1.5 - 0.5 ) x 0.5 x 14.4
= 14.4 kips
- Shear Stress Ratio : IR = 5.8 / 14.4
= 0.406 < 1.000 -----> OK
Bearing Stress Check

- Allowable Bearing Stress : FB = 0.9 x Fy
= 32.4 ksi
- Bearing Capacity : FB-c = dp x ( tm x FB )
= 0.875 x ( 0.5 x 32.4)
= 14.2 ksi
- Bearing Stress Ratio : IR = 5.8 / 14.2
= 0.411 < 1.000 -----> OK
Stress at The Base of Padeye

- Forces : PV = P x sin 60o
= 5.8 x 0.866
= 5.1 kips
PH = P x cos 60o
= 5.8 x 0.5
= 2.9 kips
CALCULATION SHEET
PS = PH
= 2.9 kips Y Y
rm
rh
A X
0.50
B
2
6.12 3
C
SECT-C SECT-A SECT-B
- Area : AA = 0.5 x 6.12

= 3.1 in2
AB = 0.5 x 6.12 + 2 x 3 x 0.5
= 6.1 in2
- Moment of Inertia : IXA = 1/12 x 0.5 x 6.12^3
= 9.6 in4
IXB = 1/12 x 0.5 x 6.12^3 + 1/6 x 3 x 0.5^3 + 2 x 0.5 x 3 x 3.06^2
= 39.9 in4
IYA = 1/12 x 6.12 x 0.5^3
= 0.1 in4
IYB = 1/12 x 6.12 x 0.5^3 + 1/6 x 0.5 x 3^3
= 2.3 in4
check 1
- Moment of Neutral Axis : MX = PH x 0.5
= 1.5 kips in
MY = PL x 0.5
= 0.6 kips in
- Axial Stress : FA = PV / A A
= 5.1 / 3.1 = 1.7 ksi (tension)
- Bending Stress : FBX = MX / IXA x Y / 2
= 1.5 / 9.6 x 6.12 / 2
= 0.468 ksi
FBY = MY / IYA x X / 2
= 0.6 / 0.1 x 0.50 / 2
= 2.353 ksi
- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

= 0.195 < 1.000 -----> OK
CALCULATION SHEET
check 2
- Moment of Neutral Axis : MX = PH x 2.5
= 7.3 kips in
MY = PL x 2.5
= 0.8 kips in
- Axial Stress : FA = PV / A B
= 5.1 / 6.1 = 0.8 ksi (tension)
- Bending Stress : FBX = MX / IXB x Y / 2
= 7.3 / 39.9 x 6.12 / 2
= 0.56 ksi
FBY = MY / IYB x X / 2
= 0.8 / 2.3 x 3.00 / 2
= 0.486 ksi
- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

= 0.083 < 1.000 -----> OK
Main Plate to Beam Full Weld

Weld type E-70XX Electrod ---> FY = 70.0 ksi
Allowable Stress ---> FW = 0.3 x FY = 21.0 ksi
- Minimum Weld Thickness : tw = ( P / ( ( 2 x 6.12 + 4 x 3 ) x Fw )) / 0.707

= 0.032 in ---> use 1/4 in the fillet weld
CALCULATION SHEET
C.1 CONNECTION DETAIL
C.1.1 CONNECTION BETWEEN W 24x76 AND W 12X40

Used E70XX WELD ---> Fu = 70 ksi
To determine nominal thickness of weld, the moment and shear capacity of W 12x40 by load combination 19 is used ,
as follows:
Forces data
MY = -882.862 kips.in VY = 0.1881 kips P= 0.9393 kips

MZ = -26.7395 kips.in VZ = 12.6108 kips
Connection sketches
Z
Ftension
A
VZ
W 12X40 VY MY
MY VZ
Y
MZ
W 24x76 Fcompression
11.240
SECTIONA A-
A
Profile data
W 12X40 W 24x76
web height ( hw ) = 12.000 in web height ( hw ) = 23.92 in
flange width ( wf ) = 8.000 in flange width ( wf ) = 9 in
flange thick. ( tf ) = 0.500 in flange thick. ( tf ) = 0.68 in
web thick. ( tw ) = 0.313 in web thick. ( tw ) = 0.44 in
Allowable
Allowable stress on fillet weld for tension/compression force is same as base metal (0.6 Fy) refer to TABLE J2.5, AISC-
ASD 9th Edition.
Allowable Tension Stress = Allowable Compression Stress = F = 0.6 x 36

= 21.600 ksi
CALCULATION SHEET
Welding properties
Fillet weld, tn = 0.3125 in

Groove weld, te = 0.500 in
Z
Le1 : Groove weld
: Fillet weld
L e2
Welding projection area
W 12X40 -----> Le1 = bf - tw = 8.000 - 0.313 = 7.688 in

Le2 = d - 2 tf = 12.000 - 1 = 11 in
Aeff = 0.707 x tn x ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) + Le1 x te = 12.10129 in2

Sy = ( Le1 x Le2 + Le2 /3 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x Le2 x te / 2
2
= 48.7348 in3
Sz = Le1 x te / 6 + Le1 /3 x tn x 0.707
2 2
= 9.277101 in3
Connection check
Shear
f'y = Vy / A = 0.1881 / 12.10129 = 0.02 ksi
f'z = Vz / A = 12.6108 / 12.10129 = 1.04 ksi
Axial
f'x = P/ A = 0.9393 / 12.10129 = 0.08 ksi
Bending
f'"y = My / Sy = -882.862 / 48.7348 = -18.12 ksi
f'"z = Mz / Sz = -26.7395 / 9.277101 = -2.88 ksi
Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :
fy = f'y2 + (f"x + f"'y + f"'z)2 = 21.07558 ksi < 21.6 ksi ===> OK
UC = 0.975721
fz = f'z2 + (f"x + f"'y + f"'z)2 = 21.10133 ksi < 21.6 ksi ===> OK
UC = 0.976913
CALCULATION SHEET
C.1.2 CONNECTION BETWEEN W 8x28 AND W 12x40

Used E70XX WELD ---> Fu = 70 ksi
To determine nominal thickness of weld, the moment and shear capacity of W 8x28 by load combination 31 is used ,
as follows:
Forces data
MY = -117.31 kips.in VY = 2.2402 kips P = -13.2119 kips

MZ = 71.2968 kips.in VZ = -3.8657 kips
Connection sketches
Z
Ftension
A
VZ
VY MY
W 8x28 VZ
MY
Y
MZ
W 12x40 Fcompression W 12x40
SECTIONA A-
A
Profile data
W 8x28 W 12x40
web height ( hw ) = 8.060 in web height ( hw ) = 12.000 in
flange width ( wf ) = 6.535 in flange width ( wf ) = 8.000 in
flange thick. ( tf ) = 0.465 in flange thick. ( tf ) = 0.500 in
web thick. ( tw ) = 0.285 in web thick. ( tw ) = 0.313 in
Allowable
Allowable stress on fillet weld for tension/compression force is same as base metal (0.6 Fy) refer to TABLE J2.5, AISC-
ASD 9th Edition.
Allowable Tension Stress = Allowable Compression Stress = F = 0.6 x 36

= 21.600 ksi
CALCULATION SHEET
Welding properties
Fillet weld, tn = 0.25 in

Groove weld, te = 0.465 in
Z
Le1 : Groove weld
: Fillet weld
L e2
Welding projection area

W 8x28 -----> Le1 = bf - tw = 6.535 - 0.285 = 6.250 in
Le2 = d - 2 tf = 8.060 - 0.93 = 7.13 in
Aeff = 0.707 x tn x ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) + Le1 x te = 7.63608 in2

Sy = ( Le1 x Le2 + Le2 /3 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x Le2 x te / 2
2
= 21.23234 in3
Sz = Le1 x te / 6 + Le1 /3 x tn x 0.707
2 2
= 5.328776 in3
Connection check
Shear
f'y = Vy / A = 2.2402 / 7.63608 = 0.29 ksi
f'z = Vz / A = -3.8657 / 7.63608 = -0.51 ksi
Axial
f'x = P/ A = -13.2119 / 7.63608 = -1.73 ksi
Bending
f'"y = My / Sy = -117.31 / 21.23234 = -5.53 ksi
f'"z = Mz / Sz = 71.2968 / 5.328776 = 13.38 ksi
Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :
fy = f'y2 + (f"x + f"'y + f"'z)2 = 20.63694 ksi < 21.6 ksi ===> OK
UC = 0.955414
fz = f'z2 + (f"x + f"'y + f"'z)2 = 20.64107 ksi < 21.6 ksi ===> OK
UC = 0.955605
APPENDIX D
Structural Model
D.1
Structure model of Deck Extension for
In-place analysis
D.2
Structure model of Deck Extension for
Lift analysis
APPENDIX C
Deck Detail Design

C.1
Connection Detail
C.2
Padeye, sling and Shackle design
APPENDIX B
Lift Analysis
B.1
Input file of Lift Analysis
B.2
Output file of Lift Analysis
APPENDIX A
In-Place Analysis
A.1
Input File of In-Place Analysis
A.2
Output File of In-Place Analysis
CALCULATION SHEET
SUBJECT Deck extension Attaka " B " platform analysis JOB NO. 2542
BY RDM / CHY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY SHEET OF
VI SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULTS
VI.1 Summary Loading
The structure loadings included in the analysis are as follows:
VI.1.1 Summary Loading of In-place Analysis
Vertical
Operating Storm
No. Basic Load Case
(kips) (kips)
1 Structural steel selfweight (including 10% contingency) 57.230 57.230
2 Blanket live load, appurtenances, & Equipment 571.393 429.887
Total 628.623 487.117
Horizontal
X -dir Y - dir
No. Basic Load Case
(kips) (kips)
1 Wind load (Operating) 0.875 0.735
2 Wind load (Extreme Storm) 0.907 0.761
4 Earthquake 78.267 78.267
VI.1.2 Summary Loading of Lift Analysis
Operating
No. Basic Load Case
(kips)
1 Structural steel selfweight (including 10% contingency) 4.686
2 Deck plates 3.176
Total 7.862
VI.2 Summary Stresses check
The following maximum member checks are obtained for various locations in the structure. All
members were checked against API and AISC criteria for buckling and yield.
file: 514706535.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

CALCULATION SHEET
VI.2.1 Summary Stresses check of In-place Analysis
Operating Condition
Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

Existing Beam ( BE1 ) 0.91 20 W 24X76
Beam of Deck Extension (BM1) 0.81 19 W 12X40
Beam of Deck Extension (BM2) 0.46 20 C 6X10.5
Extreme Storm Condition

Earthquake Condition

VI.2.2 Summary Stresses check of Lift Analysis


CALCULATION SHEET
VI.3 Summary Joint Deflections
The following maximum joint deflections are obtained in the deck extension and existing deck
structure.
VI.3.1 Summary Joint Deflections of In-place Analysis
Operating Condition
Deflection Rotation
Joint Number Load Comb.
( inch ) ( rad )
505 0.341 0.0035 18
Extreme Storm Condition
Deflection Rotation
( inch ) ( rad )
505 0.255 0.0026 22
Earthquake Condition
Deflection Rotation
( inch ) ( rad )
35 1.048 0.0076 31
VI.3.2 Summary Joint Deflections of Lift Analysis
Deflection Rotation
( inch ) ( rad )
3 0.387 0.001 3
VI.4 Foundation Check
Additional load due to deck extension will be as follows:
- Self weight of structure include contingency 10 % = 5,354 lbs

- Deck plates and acessories, 7.6 psf, with plane area is = 1,901 lbs
20.5' x 12.2'
- Blanket area load, 100 psf, with plane area is 20.5' x 12.2' = 25,010 lbs
- Transformer = 9,259 lbs
+
Total = 41,523 lbs
= 42 kips
This additional weight will be conservatively assumed to be taken by pile axis B3.

CALCULATION SHEET
Refer to original design from design report with document number A0104-ST-REP-0001 rev 0
have ilustrated as follows:
Worst case 102. Minimum required safety factor is 1.5
Based on table: Pile axial capacity safety factors (Based on society's loads and axial capacity
curves, borehole 3, attaka area.)
Pile A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3
Case Penetration (ft) 290 290 290 290 290 290
102 Load (kips) 60 742 1340 91 722 1340
Original
Capacity (kips) 1670 1710 1710 1670 1710 1710

Safety Factor 27.8 2.30 1.28 18.35 2.37 1.28
Load (kips) 60 742 1340 91 722 1,382
+ New
Capacity (kips) 1670 1710 1710 1670 1710 1710

Safety Factor 28 2.30 1.28 18.35 2.37 1.24
Based on table: Pile axial capacity safety factors (Based on society's loads and McClelland's
capacity curves, borehole 3, attaka area.)
Pile A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3
Case Penetration (ft) 290 290 290 290 290 290
102 Load (kips) 60 742 1340 91 722 1340
Original
Capacity (kips) 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2030

Safety Factor 37.2 3.01 1.66 24.51 3.09 1.51
Load (kips) 60 742 1340 91 722 1,382
+ New
Capacity (kips) 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2030

Safety Factor 37 3.01 1.66 24.51 3.09 1.47
The above results show that the deck leg still acceptable for attaka " B " with new deck extension.

CALCULATION SHEET
IV METHOD OF ANALYSIS
To represent the existing member affected by the additional extension, part of the cellar deck framing will be
modelled in the structural model for the deck extension. The structure will be modeled and analyzed by SACS
program with static analysis method. For earthquake analysis will use static equivalent method. The overall
structure was assumed adequate to accommodate this additional.
Stress analysis of new structures will be done with several assumptions as follows:
1 Member lengths are assumed from node to node.

2 Loading is generally assumed, as blanket area load that will be described in the section design loading.
3 Connection between new structure and existing structure will be considered as fixed connection.
4 Self-weight is considered by 10% contingency to accommodate steel plate out of computer modeled.
5 Static equivalent analysis is used to calculate distribution of seismic forces. The seismic load will be
calculated by taking of the X, Y, and 0.5 of the Z responses, refer to API RP 2A (WSD) 20th Edition
section C 2.3.6. Seismic load are working on each beam subject to have gravity loads.
6 Self weight and deck plates loads only will be considered for lift analysis. The new transformer is
assumed to be lifted separately.
7 Additional load of deck extension to existing structure will be considered for foundation analysis. That will
be compared with the existing pile capacity. No detail pile stress analysis is carried out, however
appraisal of pile axial load safety factor will refer to the Llyod's inspection report for Attaka B platform -
table "Pile Axial Capacity safety factors" based on Society's loads and Mc Clelland's capacity curves,
Borehole 3.
V. DESIGN LOADING
The platform has been analyzed both for gravity and lateral loads.
V.1. Gravity Loads
Gravity loads, which can be evaluated as a function of model member volumes are generated by
providing appropriate densities. Other non-generated loads are calculated externally to the model and
input as either member or nodal loads.
a. Structural Dead Weight
The structure dead weight will be taken as the self weight of structure modelled and not madelled
including deck plates, stairway.
- Self weight of structure modelled. computer generated + contingency 10%

- Deck plates. 7.6 psf as area loads
- Stairway. 1.2 kips as point loads
file: 514706535.xls/DESIGN LOADING

CALCULATION SHEET
b. Area Live Loads
Distributed area load which cover equipment loads, piping, electrical and fluid.
Blanket loads are presented as follows:

Deck extension
- Operating Condition 100 psf
- Storm Condition 75 psf
- Seismic Condition 75 psf
c. Vertical loads of Equipment
Loading of equipment load will be as follow:
Description Weigth (lbs) Area Load (psf) Size (width x length)

Transformer 9259 250 9 ft x 7 ft
V.2. Lateral Loads
a. Wind Loads
The one minute sustained wind will be used in the analysis.

Wind load, which will be considered in the analysis, is subject to act at both X and Y direction.
The pressure is given by:

P = 0.00256 Cs V2 (psf)
Cs = 1.0 for overall
Operating wind pressure :
P = 2.72 psf
Extreme storm wind pressure :
P = 3.70 psf
Plane area;
Y dir.
N
47.0 ft
48.7 ft
dir.
X
height of equipment average is 6.6 ft

CALCULATION SHEET
Projection area for each wind directions will be as follows:
X direction;
Area = 6.6 x 48.7 = 321 ft2
Y direction;
Area = 6.6 x 47.0 = 310 ft2
Wind forces:
Forces to be distributed to 4 joints for the wind from Y direction and to 7 joints for
the wind from X direction.
Operating wind force:

FX = 2.72 x 321 / 7 = 125 lb
FY = 2.72 x 310 / 4 = 211 lb
Extreme storm wind force:

FX = 3.70 x 321 / 7 = 170 lb
FY = 3.70 x 310 / 4 = 287 lb
V.3. Load Combination
Allowable
1 110% Dead load + Blanket live load + Equipment Dead Weight + Operating Wind 1.00
2 110% Dead load + 75% Blanket live load + Equipment Dead Weight + Extreme Wi 1.33
3 110% Dead load + 75% Blanket live load + Equipment Dead Weight + Operating 1.00
4 110% Dead load + 75% Blanket live load + Equipment Dead weight + Earthquake 1.70
5 Dead Load ( for lift analysis with dynamic load factor 2.) 0.50
6 Dead Load ( for lift analysis with dynamic load factor 1.35.) 0.74

CALCULATION SHEET
III. STRUCTURAL MODELING
III.1 Equipment Layout
N
26.5 ' 20.5 '
100 psf
100 psf
LBS
12.2 '
B
250 psf
stairway Transformer
300 psf 36.5 '
A
18.5 ' 18.5 '
2 3
CELLAR DECK
EXTENSION
el. 35' 0"
note:
deck extension
existing
file: 514706535.xls/STRUCTURAL MODEL

CALCULATION SHEET
III.2 Structural Model
This section present of the structural model in the computer program for In-place analysis and Lift
analysis. The deck extension model to be presented in the next sheet (appendix D).
Every Structural model consist of Joint numbering, Member group, and member properties.
III.3 Member Properties
Member properties of the deck extension will be as follows:
MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER

NO. REMARK
GROUP PROPERTIES GRADE
1 BE1 W 24X76 A 36 Existing
2 BE2 W 21X62 A 36 Existing
3 BM1 W 12X40 A 36 New Deck Extension
4 BM2 C 6X10.5 A 36 New Deck Extension
file: 514706535.xls/STRUCTURAL MODEL

CALCULATION SHEET
I. INTRODUCTION
Unocal Indonesia intends to upgrade the existing power transformer and replace the load break oil switch at
attaka B platform. The existing transformer on the roof of switch gear room and will be removed. The
replacement new transformer and new load break oil switch will be located at cellar deck extension, west side
of B3 (switch gear room). The platform needs to be modified to accommodate these changes.
Size of the deck extension is 20.5 ft x 12.2 ft and that will be at cellar deck, west side of B3.
This report covers the deck extension analysis to accommodate new transformer and maintenance access.
The strength analysis to be considered by static loading only.
Deck extensions will be checked and calculated by local analysis only, as separate structure with the existing
platform, based on TRIPATRA’s scope of work. The existing platform was assumed adequate to accommodate
the deck extensions.
II. DESIGN CRITERIA
II.1 Environmental Criteria
The design environmental criteria used in the analysis refer to UOI-GS-18
*) wind speed in 33' height above CD

Wind
Design Conditions Speed
(MPH) *
5-year Operating Storm 32.6

50-year Extreme Storm 38.0
II.2 Blanket Uniformly Distributed Loads
Area live load of a new deck extension refer to table 1 in the specification no. UI-M-SSP-GEN for
miscellaneous steel structures will be taken as 100 psf.
Deck extension Existing Deck

- Operating Condition 100 psf 300 **
- Storm Condition 75 psf 225
- Seismic Condition 75 psf 225
( ** cellar deck framing load based on design report no. A0104-ST-REP-0001 )
file: 514706535.xls/INTRODUCTION
CALCULATION SHEET
II.3 Earthquake Criteria
The deck extension platform is checked for ductility level eartquake (DLE) which correspond to 2000 year
return period events.
Peak Ground Acceleration as a function of return period is taken from UOI-GS-18 is as follow:
Seismic Level Return Period (year) PGA (g)

Ductility 2000 0.125
II.4 Design Codes
The following codes, standard, specifications, and existing design report are to be used to design,
fabricate and install the structure.
API RP2A. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore
Platforms, 20th edition, July 1993 issued by American Petroleum Institute.
AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, 9th edition, 1989 issued by
American Institute of Steel Construction.
AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code issued by American Welding Society.
UI-M-SSP-GEN General Specification for Miscellaneous Steel for Offshore Structure.
UOI-GS-18 General Specification for Site Condition and Climate, revision 3.
A0104-ST-REP-0001 rev 0 Design report of local structure study attaka "B" platform - Water Treatment
Project - by PT. Kvaerner.
CALCULATION SHEET
II.5 Allowable Stresses
The following increase in allowable stresses have been considered for the design.
Load Conditions Allowable Stresses Increased

Operating Storm 1.000
Extreme Storm 1.333
Earthquake 1.700
II.6 Material Grades
All steel beam material shall conform to ASTM A36 (Fy=36 ksi) except tubular shall be API 5L grade B
(Fy=35 ksi).
CALCULATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION
II DESIGN CRITERIA
II.1 Environmental Criteria

II.2 Blanket Uniformly Distributed Loads
II.3 Earthquake Criteria
II.4 Design Code
II.5 Allowable Stresses
II.6 Material Grades
III STRUCTURAL MODELING
III.1 Equipment Lay Out

III.2 Structural Model
III.3 Member Properties
IV METHOD OF ANALYSIS
V LOADING of DESIGN
V.1 Gravity Load

V.2 Lateral load
V.3 Load Combination
VI SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULT
VI.1 Summary Loading

VI.2 Summary Stresses check
VI.3 Summary Joint Deflections
VI.4 Foundation Check
APPENDIX A In-Place Analysis
A. 1 Input File of In-Place Analysis
file: 514706535.xls/TOC
CALCULATION SHEET
A. 2 Output File of In-Place Analysis
APPENDIX B Lift Analysis
B.1 Input File of Lift Analysis

B.2 Output File of Lift Analysis
APPENDIX C Deck Detail Design
C.1 Connection Detail

C.2 Padeye, sling, and shackle design
APPENDIX D Structural Model
D.1 Structure model of Deck Extension for In-place analysis

D.2 Structure model of Deck Extension for Lift analysis

Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PT.

Selection of Sling Type

Selection of Shackle Type

Type = G-210 S-215

Design Lateral Force ( PL ) = 5% x 5.8 = 0.3 kips = 0.15 short ton

Determination of Main Plate

Shear Stress Check

Bearing Stress Check

Stress at The Base of Padeye

- Area : AA = 0.5 x 6.12

- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

Main Plate to Beam Full Weld

- Minimum Weld Thickness : tw = ( P / ( ( 2 x 6.12 + 4 x 3 ) x Fw )) / 0.707

C.1 CONNECTION DETAIL

C.1.1 CONNECTION BETWEEN W 24x76 AND W 12X40

MY = -882.862 kips.in VY = 0.1881 kips P= 0.9393 kips

Allowable Tension Stress = Allowable Compression Stress = F = 0.6 x 36

Fillet weld, tn = 0.3125 in

Welding projection area

W 12X40 -----> Le1 = bf - tw = 8.000 - 0.313 = 7.688 in

Aeff = 0.707 x tn x ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) + Le1 x te = 12.10129 in2

Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :

C.1.2 CONNECTION BETWEEN W 8x28 AND W 12x40

MY = -117.31 kips.in VY = 2.2402 kips P = -13.2119 kips

W 12x40 Fcompression W 12x40

Allowable Tension Stress = Allowable Compression Stress = F = 0.6 x 36

Fillet weld, tn = 0.25 in

Welding projection area

Aeff = 0.707 x tn x ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) + Le1 x te = 7.63608 in2

Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :

Deck Detail Design

VI SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULTS

VI.1 Summary Loading

The structure loadings included in the analysis are as follows:

VI.1.1 Summary Loading of In-place Analysis

VI.1.2 Summary Loading of Lift Analysis

VI.2 Summary Stresses check

file: 514706535.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

VI.2.1 Summary Stresses check of In-place Analysis

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

Extreme Storm Condition

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

VI.2.2 Summary Stresses check of Lift Analysis

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

file: 514706535.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

VI.3 Summary Joint Deflections

VI.3.1 Summary Joint Deflections of In-place Analysis

Extreme Storm Condition

VI.3.2 Summary Joint Deflections of Lift Analysis

VI.4 Foundation Check

Additional load due to deck extension will be as follows:

- Self weight of structure include contingency 10 % = 5,354 lbs

file: 514706535.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

Worst case 102. Minimum required safety factor is 1.5

Capacity (kips) 1670 1710 1710 1670 1710 1710