Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quiz 2 Questions
Quiz 2 Questions
Quiz 2
e Hamid was summoned to give evidence in a court Even though Sajid bailed on his promise to
where Sajid was in litigation. Sajid promised to pay pay for giving the evidence, the agreement
certain amount to Hamid for giving the evidence. Later, was void ab initio, as the consideration was
Sajid refused to pay. Hamid sued and failed. Held, the not lawful. It was the legal duty to provide
consideration was not valid the evidence in any case.
i Ameer promises to obtain for Faqeer an employment Although consideration does exist in this
in the public service, and Faqeer promises to pay scenario, the consideration is unlawful as it
Rs.1,000/- to Ameer. The agreement is void could be deemed as nepotism.
j An employer and employee agree that employee
cannot enter into any contract for five years whether
personal or professional in nature. The agreement is
void, Why?
k A intending to deceive B, falsely represents that five In this case, there is absence of free
hundred quintals of indigo are made annually at As consent. A is committing fraud by
factory and thereby induces B to buy the factory. Why intentionally misrepresenting facts to B so
is the contract is voidable? that he can sell his factory. It is true that in
some cases, not mentioning flaws is
allowed (for advertising purposes), but
fraud results in the contract becoming
voidable.
l Abid, Sajid and Amjad enter into an agreement of the
division among them of gains acquired by them by
fraud. Why is the agreement is void,
m Abid promised to pay Rs.100,000 to Sajid on agreeing
to publish a defamatory article against Arslan. Why is
the agreement void.
n Abid, who is guardian of Tanveer, promises to exercise
his influence, as such, with Tanveer in favour of
Farhan, and Farhan promises to pay Rs 1,000 to Abid.
Why is the agreement is void,
3. A promise to pay debt is enforceable, if it is made in writing and It is signed by the debtor or his agent.
4. Inadequacy of consideration does not affect validity of contract, but whatever consideration is being given
it must be real.
5. An agreement is said to be unlawful if the court regards it as oppose to public policy. Which one of the
following is not against the public policy?
a. Stifling prosecution
b. Sale of public offices
c. Trading with alien friend
d. Marriage brokerage agreement
6. Mr. A, in consideration of Rs. 100,000/- from Mr. B agrees to publish defamatory material against Mr.
Talal, a famous lawyer, in order to damage his goodwill and reputation. This agreement is void because
a. It is fraudulent
b. It is immoral and against public policy
c. It involves an injury to a person
d. It defeats the provision of any law
7. Mr. T agrees to buy share at premium in a joint stock company through a broker Mr. S who has given the
false impression to the public that shares were useful of being purchased at a premium. Later on he found
that broker has sold his own shares to him and not purchased any shares from the market. What is the
status of this agreement?
a. The agreement is valid as it is a business transaction
b. The agreement is void because the consent is obtained by coercion
c. The agreement is valid because it is in the favour of Mr. T
d. The agreement is void because it was aimed at cheating the public
8. An offer will come to an end within a reasonable time when no time is specified. “What is the reasonable
time?” is a question of fact depending upon the situation and circumstances.
9. The collateral transaction to an illegal agreement is
a. Valid
b. Not to be enforced
c. Voidable
d. Not affected at all
10. An agreement to create monopoly/cartel is void as this will impair consumer sovereignty and result in
high prices for low quality of goods and services.