Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Itb Part Viii - Evaluation Criteria
Itb Part Viii - Evaluation Criteria
DATE SHEET 1 of 15
PREP’D
CHK’D
APP’D
PART VIII
EVALUATION CRITERIA
CONTENTS
1 TENDER EVALUATION...........................................................................................................3
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 3 of 15
1 TENDER EVALUATION
In order to achieve an equitable award decision PERTAMINA will evaluate the
BIDDERS Bid Proposals in two district and separate evaluation. First, evaluation for the
Administration and Technical Bid Proposals and second, evaluation for the Commercial
Bid Proposals.
The administration evaluation will use "Pass or Fail Method”, while the Technical
Evaluation will use “Passing Grade (85%)”. Technical Evaluation would be applied to
BIDDER that has passed Administration Evaluation.
Since this is the revamp project where shutdown period will directly affect to the
refinery economic balance, the reliability of BIDDER would be the most important
evaluation factor to PERTAMINA. Therefore, as an addition to Technical Evaluation,
PERTAMINA would apply additional evaluations to evaluate the reliability of BIDDERS.
The additional evaluations consist with Interview and Survey as specified below.
In addition to the result of both Administration & Technical Evaluation PERTAMINA will:
1. Conduct interview with key personnel of BIDDERS. The interview is subjected,
as a minimum, confirm and clarify about:
a. BIDDER’s confirmation that he could achieve Mechanical Completion
(Construction, TA and Precommissioning) schedule and Operational
Acceptance (Commissioning, Start-up and Performance Test) schedule.
b. BIDDER’s plan or strategy to achieve above schedule
c. Resume of key personnel. PERTAMINA would assess qualifications for
each key personnel.
d. All review points in Technical Evaluation.
2. As necessary, PERTAMINA will conduct survey to validate Technical Proposal
data that has been provided by BIDDER. Survey point that will be conducted,
as minimum will include but not limited to:
a. Past projects, on-going projects that BIDDER have.
b. Performance in other PERTAMINA’s refinery project.
c. Home office facilities that support the Revamping FCCU Project
These two additional evaluation criteria above will affect scoring point in passing grade
method.
Thereafter, PERTAMINA will select the Lowest Bid Price BIDDER during Commercial
Evaluation.
Bid evaluation system can be found at APPENDIX VIIIB.
2 ADMINISTRATION AND TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
The administration evaluation will use "Pass or Fail Method”. Meanwhile the technical
evaluation will use “Passing Grade (85%) Method” with Weighting Factor (WF) as
summarized below:
Weighting
No Evaluation Criteria
Factor
1 Experiences 20%
2 Project Schedule 15%
3 Project Execution Plan 15%
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 4 of 15
Weighting
No Evaluation Criteria
Factor
4 Project Execution Methodology and Tool 15%
5 Network System 5%
6 Construction Procedure 30%
Total 100%
More detail of Weighting Factor for Technical Evaluation can be found on APPENDIX
VIIIA of This ITB part.
Only BIDDERS that have total value for Technical Evaluation of 85 (eighty five) points
or equivalent to 85 % (eighty percent), or above will meet the minimum passing grade
and will be awarded as "Pass the Administration and Technical Evaluation". This will
automatically qualify them to continue to the Commercial Proposal Evaluation.
The following suggests a methodology of awarding points for each subject how points
should be awarded.
Score Criteria:
Score Criteria
1 Very Good 100
2 Good 90
3 Adequate 75
4 Less 50
5 None 0
2.1 EXPERIENCES
It will be reviewed that BIDDER has provided summary of relevant experiences as a
Company or Consortium and relevant experiences of key personnel that would be
employed to execute the Project.
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 5 of 15
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 6 of 15
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 7 of 15
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 8 of 15
number of pre-inspection meetings, shop visits and the total inspection man-
hours for the project, at both Indonesian and offshore locations.
4. List of equipments and materials that are subjected to be inspected by MIGAS
and other Indonesian Governmental Agency inspections.
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 9 of 15
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 10 of 15
prepare list of previous or in-going projects using such software and tools. BIDDER
shall is requested to attach certificate released from HKI (Hak Kekayaan Intelektual) to
confirm that such software has been successfully audited by authorized governmental
agency. BIDDER shall provide sample report to convince that he has implemented the
listed software.
2.5 NETWORK SYSTEM
PERTAMINA’s bid committee will review BIDDER’s network system dealing with
Procurement & QC and Communication.
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 12 of 15
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
`
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 13 of 15
DRY GAS TREATING AND OUT SIDE BATTERY LIMIT FCC UNIT PROJECT
PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) RU-III PLAJU
ITB PART VIII
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 14 of 15
APPENDIX VIIIA – DETAIL TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA AND ILLUSTRATION OF SCORING SYSTEM