1.1.1. Quality Risk Assessment.

1.1.1.1. Introduction & Scope

Risks or uncertainties shall be identified and addressed to:

 Give assurance that the Quality Management system can achieve its intended
results.
 Enhance the desirable effects.
 Prevent or reduce the undesirable effects.
 Achieve improvement.

The Project Manager shall ensure that all TARGET personnel and subcontractor
personnel undertaking or verifying work relating to this project do so in accordance
with the authorities and responsibilities defined and are provided with appropriate
instructions and, in doing so, ensure actions are initiated to:

 Prevent the occurrence of non-conformance from TARGET or Client’s

supplied products and services.
 Identify and record any quality discrepancies.
 Correct both the result and cause of quality discrepancies prior to further
processing.
 Demonstrate / substantiate the conformance of TARGET or Client supplied
products and services with specified requirements.

1.1.1.2. Definitions

 Risk: Risk is an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive

or negative impact on the organizations objectives and its ability to provide
the intended results.
 Opportunity: Opportunity is positive risks which, if it occurs, have a
beneficial impact for the organization.
 Threats: The risks which, if it occurs, have a negative impact on the
organization are termed as threats.
 Probability: The likelihood of the occurrence of the risk.
 Impact: The effect or influence that the organization shall experience if the
risk is realized.
 Secondary Risk: A risk that may occur as a result of direct implementing the
risk response plan.
 Residual Risk: The risk that is expected to remain after the implementation of
the risk response

1.1.1.3. Process Description – Management of Risks

Risk
Actions to Monitor
Identify Prioritize Responses
addressed &
the Risks Risks & Risk
risks Control
Owners
 1.1.1.4. Identification of Risks

The quality assurance representative and all on-site and offsite verification personnel
shall have the authority to hold the process which might, after evaluation and
reconsideration, give rise to non-conformity and to embargo non-conforming
products pending remedial action, with immediate reference to the Project
Management. While in the process of identifying the following technics, not limited
to, shall be used.

 Analysis of recurrence of the non-conformities.

 Root cause analysis.
 Process flow chart review
 Strength, weakness, opportunity and threat analysis.

The identified risks/recurrences shall be logged and communication may be allowed

to pass through functional channels (i.e. procurement, quality) as well as to direct
reporting responsibilities. The ITPs, Method statements Quality checklist shall be
reviewed, revised as applicable, QA/QC engineer shall conduct appropriate trainings
to the concerned to mitigate the risks.

1.1.1.5. Prioritizing the risks

Prioritization of the risk shall be based on the risk rating, by assessing each identified
risk for the probability of occurrences and impacts.

Risk Rating = Probability X Impact.

A. Probability of occurrence estimation table.

PROBABILITY OF OCCURANCE

Criteria
Rating Probability Level

5 Almost Certain
4 Likely
3 Possible
Unlikely
2
1 Rare
B. Impact estimation table
Rating Probability Level
5 Critical
 The event occurring frequently
 Strong likelihood of future recurrence.
 Event occurrence of multiple times per month in the area of operation.
 The event to occur on a regular basis.
 Subjective evidence to show medium frequency.
 Existence of substantial opportunity for risk of this nature.
 The average of occurrence only once per month
 Events of infrequent occurrence but with some reasonable opportunity
for occurrence.
 The event which happened before.
 The event occurs annually (but not more than one per month on an
average)
 The event which occurred in other companies executing the same kind
of work.
 Very few recorded/known events.
 Some opportunity to occur only in exceptional circumstances.
 The event which occurs once in two years.
 No records of the occurrence of the event/little opportunity.
 Never happened in the industry, not expected to occur.
 Almost impossible, not more than once in the history of the company.
IMPACT
Criteria
 One or more critical outcome where objectives will not be achieved.
  Large scale changes/ requirement of strategy revision
 One or more stated outcome wherein objective will fall below
4 Major acceptance criteria.
Significant changes required.
 One or more stated outcome resulting in objectives fall below the goal
3 Moderate but above minimum acceptance levels.
 Moderate changes required
 One or more stated outcome resulting in objectives falls below the goal
Minor but well above minimum acceptance criteria.
2
 No changes required.

 Little or no impact on achieving the outcome objectives.

1 Negligible  Requirement of Minor performance improvement.

C. Probability – Impact Matrix

IMPACT
Negligible Minor Moderate Major Critical

Rare L (1) L (2) L (3) M (4) M (5)

PROBABILITY

Unlikely L(2) L (4) M (6) M (8) M (10)

Possible L (3) M (6) M (9) M (12) H (15)
Likely M (4) M (8) M (12) H (16) H (20)
Almost certain M (5) M (10) H (15) H (20) H (25)

Level Range Description

Low (L) 1 to 5 The risk has no impact on organizational or Customer

requirements
Medium (M) 6 to 14 The risk has an indirect impact on Organizational or Customer
requirements
High (H) 15 to 25 The risk has direct impact on Organizational or Customer
requirements

1.1.1.6. High Level Risk

RISK ASSESSMENT REGISTER

Probability
Probabili Impact Mitigation
S/L No. ACTIVITY -Impact Risk Assessment Response
ty Level Level Action/Remarks
Rating
  QA Procedure
has been
Latest approved copy of
prepared and
controlled drawing to be
Control of followed in the
1 4 4 H16 maintained,
Drawings Project.All the
Verify/review/revise of
drawings are
drawing log as applicable.
issued thru DC
with CC stamp.
 On progress
Delay in Order approved material
followed by
2 material 4 4 H16 well in advance. Review &
Construction
delivery revise long lead items.
team.
 All materials
shall be
inspected by QC
Project materials to be Inspector/Manag
Wrong inspected prior to usage. er and obtain
3 material is 3 4 M12 Material log to be reviewed, Company
used updated and revised as approval prior
applicable to use.
Explained thru
quality
induction.
Quality TBT shall be done
for the activity emphasizing
the project specs, approved
drawings, involuntary Internal Non-
Non- circumstances like conformance
conforming inclement weather. procedure in
4 3 4 M12
product / Supervision shall be strictly progress and all
services. imposed. Non-conforming the works shall
product/service shall be be inspected by
categorized into either QC inspector
rework, repair or re-use as before Company
applicable inspection.
Approved material and
Leakage in
trained
5 the 2 5 M10
applicator/technician shall  Trained
waterproofing
be deployed. Vibrator used .
 Following
proper line and
Lines and levels, and
levels
Wrong pipe correct material schedule to
.Inspection and
6 laying 3 3 M9 be checked, Approved MS to
marking by
practice be followed, considering the
Surveyor at
revision as applicable
every stage of
works.
Leakage in  Engaged skilled
Installation of fittings, pipe
7 pressure 2 3 M6 personnels in
jointing to be checked.
testing joints works.
8 Excess depth 3 2 M6 Excavation level to be  Surveyor shall
of excavation checked carefully. Updated check in every
approved shop drawing shall stage of work
be used. with latest
approved
drawing.