Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44


www.elsevier.com/locate/toxinvit

Effects of mixing metal ions on oxidative DNA damage mediated


by a Fenton-type reduction
a,*
Hiroshi Moriwaki , Martin R. Osborne b, David H. Phillips b

a
Osaka City Institute of Public Health & Environmental Sciences, 8-34, Tojo-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543-0026, Japan
b
Institute of Cancer Research, Brookes Lawley Building, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK

Received 31 July 2006; accepted 30 July 2007


Available online 10 August 2007

Abstract

The formation of 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and strand breaks in DNA by Fenton-type reactions by mixtures of two of
five metal ions, iron (II), cadmium (II), nickel (II), chromium (III) or copper (II), has been investigated and compared to their formation
by each single metal ion. Salmon sperm DNA and pBluescript K+ plasmid were each incubated with hydrogen peroxide and metal ions.
The formation of 8-OHdG declined in the Fe (II) or Cu (II) Fenton reaction upon addition of Cd (II) or Ni (II) ion. In contrast, the Fe
(II) reaction upon addition of Cr (III) ion showed an additive influence on the formation of 8-OHdG. Furthermore, the Cu (II) plus Cr
(III) reaction showed a synergistic effect. These influences relate to the interaction of metal ions with DNA, the potentials of the metal
ions to generate activated oxygen and electron transfer between metal ions. The formation of DNA strand breaks was investigated in
plasmid DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequent densitometry. The formation of DNA strand breaks in the Fe (II) or
Cu (II) Fenton reaction decreased upon the addition of Ni (II) ion, as with the formation of 8-OHdG mediated by these metal ions.
On the other hand, the formation of DNA strand breaks in the Fe (II) reaction decreased upon addition of Cr (III) ion, and the Cu
(II) plus Cr (III) reaction did not show the synergistic influence on DNA strand breaks. These results suggest that interactions between
two metal ions can influence the generation of 8-OHdG and the formation of DNA strand breaks and demonstrate that these lesions can
arise by different mechanisms.
 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: DNA oxidative stress; Metal ion; Multiple influence

1. Introduction ing genotoxic metals (Shi et al., 2004; Ercal et al., 2001),
and elevated levels of ROS in cells have been implicated
Oxidative DNA damage is mediated by reactive oxygen in the etiology of various diseases including cancer (Feig
species (ROS) and is thought to play an important role in et al., 1994). A possible mechanism of oxidative DNA
mutagenesis, aging, and carcinogenesis (Bjelland and See- damage induced by metals is thought to be the formation
berg, 2003; Barja, 2004; Olinski et al., 2002). ROS arise of hydroxyl radicals through Fenton-type reduction with
during normal cellular processes such as aerobic metabo- hydrogen peroxide, which is naturally present in cells.
lism. However, the endogenous amount of ROS can be Iron salts are known to cause the formation of 8-
enhanced by exposure to environmental pollutants includ- hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in DNA, which is
the production of a single base modification by a damage
*
to DNA following hydroxyl radical attack, and DNA sin-
Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Applied gle- and double-strand breaks when incubated with DNA
Biology, Faculty of Textile Science & Technology, Shinshu University,
3-15-1 Tokida, Ueda, Nagano 386-8567, Japan. Tel.: +81 268 21 5333; fax:
and hydrogen peroxide in the Fenton systems (Tenopou-
+81 268 21 5331. lou et al., 2005; Glei et al., 2002). Furthermore, Cu (II)
E-mail address: moriwaki@shinshu-u.ac.jp (H. Moriwaki). and Cr (III) ions, both recognized as human carcinogens,

0887-2333/$ - see front matter  2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2007.07.011
H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44 37

also produce 8-OHdG and strand breaks in DNA, when copper (II) sulfate, iron (II) sulfate, nickel (II) sulfate, cad-
their salts are incubated with DNA in vitro in the presence mium (II) chloride and chromium (III) chloride were all
of hydrogen peroxide (Lee et al., 2002; Qi et al., 2000). In analytical grade, and were freshly made up as stock solu-
general, the formation of oxidative DNA damage needs tions (1.0 mM) in de-ionized water.
to generate a hydroxyl radical near to DNA, because
the lifetime of the hydroxyl radical is very short. There- 2.2. Treatment of salmon sperm DNA
fore, the interaction between DNA and metal ion plays
a significant role of the formation of oxidative DNA dam- Salmon sperm DNA was dissolved in de-ionized water
age mediated by a Fenton-type reduction. In fact, in a (0.5 mg/mL). The aliquots of salmon sperm DNA
previous study (Lloyd and Phillips, 1999), the Fenton- (500 lL) were incubated with hydrogen peroxide (50 mM)
type reactions in the presence of EDTA were investigated, and each single metal ion (0.010 or 0.10 mM) or mixtures
and the results suggested that interaction between DNA of two of five metal ions, Fe (II), Cd (II), Ni (II), Cr
and the metal ion influenced formation of DNA oxidative (III), and Cu (II) (the metal stock solution (1.0 mM) was
damage. added 10 or 100 lL and de-ionized water was added 490
It has been reported by many investigators that oxida- or 400 lL for metal concentrations 0.010 or 0.10 mM,
tive DNA damage can result from exposure to air pollution respectively), for 1 h at 37 C. Fenton-type reactions were
particles or diesel exhaust particles (Tsurudome et al., terminated using immobilized catalase (100 lL) which
1999; Hirano et al., 2003; Risom et al., 2003; Prahalad was removed by centrifugation after 30 min at ambient
et al., 2001). Most environmental exposure profiles are het- temperature. DNA treated with Fenton-type reactions
erogeneous with co-exposure occurring coincident with was precipitated from the supernatant with sodium chlo-
multiple toxic metal species, and this co-exposure to metals ride and ethanol.
in complex mixtures can result in an additive, suppressive
or synergistic toxic response (Nygren et al., 1992; Cui 2.3. LC-ECD analysis of salmon sperm DNA
et al., 2005). The interaction of a metal ion with DNA
could be changed by the addition of the other metal ions. DNA samples in 900 lL of water were digested over-
Therefore, mixing transition metal ions could influence night with deoxyribonuclease I (150 lg, pH 7) followed
the oxidative DNA damage mediated by a Fenton-type by a 6-h incubation with snake venom phosphodiesterase
reduction. It is very important for assessments of the geno- (12 lg, pH 9). The resulting nucleotides were converted
toxicity induced by environmental samples to understand to nucleosides with alkaline phosphatase (1.2 units).
the influence of interactions between several heavy metals Hydrolysate was applied to a Nucleosil ODS column and
on oxidative DNA stress. However, little is known about eluted with ammonium acetate (50 mM) and acetic acid
such effects (Sugden et al., 2004). (50 mM) in 5% methanol at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. 8-
In this report, salmon sperm DNA and pBluescript K+ OHdG was eluted after 18–21 min and detected using an
plasmid were each incubated with hydrogen peroxide and ESA Coulochem II electrochemical detector. Unmodified
mixtures of two of five genotoxic metal ions, Fe (II), Cd deoxyguanosine (dG) was detected by UV absorption using
(II), Ni (II), Cr (III) or Cu (II). Cr (III) is unable to pass a Pharmacia UV-1 detector. The amounts of 8-OHdG and
easily through the cell membrane. However, within the cell, dG present in the DNA samples were calculated by mea-
Cr (VI) is metabolically reduced by ascorbic acid, glutathi- suring the height of the peaks obtained from both electro-
one or cysteine to Cr (III), the most stable form of Cr chemical and UV traces and comparing those obtained
(O’Brien et al., 2002). Therefore, Cr (III) ion was selected from synthetic standards.
as a metal ion for the Fenton-type reaction in this study.
The formation of 8-OHdG and strand breaks in DNA 2.4. Treatment and analysis of pBluescript K+ DNA
mediated by Fenton-type reactions has been investigated
and compared to their formation by each single metal ion. Plasmid DNA was dissolved in de-ionized water (10 ng/
mL). Aliquots of plasmid DNA (10 lL) were incubated
2. Experimental with hydrogen peroxide (1 mM) and each single metal
ion (final concentration at 0.4 or 4.0 lM) or equivalent
2.1. Materials mixtures of two of five metal ions for 15 min at ambient
temperature. Samples were immediately loaded, without
Salmon sperm DNA, deoxyribonuclease I, alkaline further treatment or purification, onto a 1% agarose gel
phosphatase, nd immobilized catalase (4% beaded agarose) containing ethidium bromide. Following electrophoresis
were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, Dorset, (1 h, 100 V) in Tris acetate buffer, gels were viewed under
UK). Snake venom phosphodiesterase was purchased from UV light and photographed using a UVP Imagestore
USB Corporation (Cleveland, Ohio, USA). pBluescript 5000 video camera (Ultraviolet Products) and images were
K+ (SK+) plasmid DNA was obtained according to a stored in TIFF format on floppy disk. Densitometry anal-
method previously described (Lloyd and Phillips, 1999). ysis of individual DNA bands was achieved using Image-
Chemicals used in the Fenton-type treatment of DNA, Quant software.
38 H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44

3. Results 0.010 mM and Cd (II) and Ni (II) at 0.10 mM did not gen-
erate levels of 8-OHdG that were significantly higher than
3.1. Formation of 8-OHdG the yield found in DNA treated with hydrogen peroxide
alone (p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). On the other hand,
8-OHdG is an important oxidative DNA adduct leading incubation of DNA with the Fe (II) and Cu (II) Fenton-
to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. The ability of single type reactions at 0.010 mM generated a yield of 8-OHdG
metal ion or a mixture of metal ions in the presence of higher than that observed with peroxide only. The highest
hydrogen peroxide to induce 8-OHdG formation in salmon yield of 8-OHdG through the Fenton-type reaction by sin-
sperm was determined using HPLC/ECD/UV. The forma- gle metal ion was generated in the Fe (II) reaction
tions of 8-OHdG induced by metal ions through Fenton- (0.10 mM), and a yield of 250/104 deoxyguanosine was
type reactions are summarized in Table 1. observed. In the case of the Fenton-type reactions with a
In the case of single metal ion Fenton-type reactions, mixture of metal ions, Cd (II) plus Ni (II), Cd (II) plus
treatment of DNA with Cd (II), Ni (II) and Cr (III) at Cr (III), Ni (II) plus Cr (III) at 0.010 mM and Cd (II) plus
Ni (II) at 0.10 mM did not generate levels of 8-OHdG that
were significantly higher than that with peroxide only
Table 1
(p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test).
8-OHdG formation mediated by Fenton-like reaction with salmon sperm
DNA In order to evaluate the influence of mixing metal ion on
the formation of 8-OHdG, the influence of the interaction
Metal ions 0.010 mM 0.10 mM
of metal ions on the formation of 8-OHdG was evaluated
8-OHdG per Recovery of 8-OHdG per Recovery of
by Eq. (1).
10e4 dGa dG (%)b 10e4 dGa dG (%)b
Untreated 7.5 ± 3.6c 100 7.5 ± 3.6c 100 8-OHdG ðmetal A plus BÞ
Ratio ¼
H2O2 only 20 ± 6.3d 86 ± 14j 20 ± 6.3d 86 ± 14j 8-OHdG ðmetal AÞ þ 8-OHdG ðmetal BÞ  8-OHdG ðuntreatedÞ
Fe 51 ± 5.1e,h 80 ± 3.0k 250 ± 37.5c,h 56 ± 3.1l ð1Þ
Cd 10 ± 1.5e,i 71 ± 19k 24 ± 8.4f,i 100 ± 7.2m
Ni 8.9 ± 3.8e,i 110 ± 16k 26 ± 9.4f,i 92 ± 9.3m
Cr 14 ± 2.5e,i 73 ± 16k 87 ± 23g,h 78 ± 12n ‘‘8-OHdG (metal A)’’ in Eq. (1) means the value of the for-
Cu 180 ± 40e,h 53 ± 9.0k 200 ± 50g,h 7.3 ± 3.5n mation of 8-OHdG (per 104 dG) through Fenton-type reac-
Fe + Cd 44 ± 4.4e,h 67 ± 12k 150 ± 48f,h 47 ± 8.2m tion of metal A. The results were summarized in Table 2.
Fe + Ni 51 ± 7.7e,h 66 ± 12k 140 ± 35f,h 47 ± 13m The differences between the 8-OHdG formation treated
Fe + Cr 67 ± 11e,h 68 ± 10k 320 ± 21e,h 36 ± 5.8k
Fe + Cu 180 ± 27e,h 56 ± 8.0k 330 ± 18e,h 21 ± 14k
with the mixture of two ions (numerator in Eq. (1)) and
Cd + Ni 13 ± 3.3e,i 75 ± 17k 16 ± 5.9e,i 96 ± 4.0k that calculated by the sum of the 8-OHdG formation with
Cd + Cr 15 ± 3.9e,i 68 ± 6.6k 69 ± 3.5e,h 73 ± 11k
Cd + Cu 180 ± 38e,h 54 ± 8.0k 160 ± 42f,h 7.3 ± 1.5m
Table 2
Ni + Cr 19 ± 8.7e,i 69 ± 14k 88 ± 19e,h 72 ± 12k
Effects of mixture of metal ion on the formation of 8-OHdG
Ni + Cu 180 ± 38e,h 50 ± 5.1k 150 ± 38e,h 10 ± 6.8k
Cr + Cu 220 ± 17e,h 53 ± 5.9k 620 ± 93e,h 12 ± 2.3k Mixture of metal ion Values of ratioa,b
a
The values are the number of 8-OHdG per 10e4 of unmodified 0.010 mM 0.10 mM
deoxyguanosine. Fe + Cd 0.82 ± 0.10 ()c,d 0.57 ± 0.18 ()c
b
The recovery of deoxyguanosine are calculated by the equation as Fe + Ni 0.97 ± 0.16e 0.53 ± 0.14 ()c
follow: recovery (%) = (dG concentration under the metal concentration/ Fe + Cr 0.89 ± 0.31e 0.98 ± 0.14 (+)f
dG concentration without addition of metal and H2O2) · 100. Fe + Cu 0.78 ± 0.15 (+)f,g 0.76 ± 0.12 ()c
c
The values are the average (n = 4), and the standard deviation. Cd + Ni 1.2 ± 0.42e 0.40 ± 0.16 ()c
d
The values are the average (n = 7), and the standard deviation. Cd + Cr 0.91 ± 0.27e 0.70 ± 0.18 ()c
e
The values are the average (n = 3), and the standard deviation. Cd + Cu 0.98 ± 0.24e 0.79 ± 0.28 ()c
f
The values are the average (n = 5), and the standard deviation. Ni + Cr 1.3 ± 0.59e 0.88 ± 0.28e,f
g
The values are the average (n = 6), and the standard deviation. Ni + Cu 1.0 ± 0.24e 0.71 ± 0.24 ()c
h
The difference between the level of 8-OHdG treated with hydrogen Cr + Cu 1.2 ± 0.21e 2.3 ± 0.57 (·)c,h
peroxide alone and that treated with the metal was significant (p < 0.05,
a
Mann–Witney test). The values are calculated by Eq. (1).
b
i
The difference between the level of 8-OHdG treated with hydrogen The values are averages and standard deviations of the ratio.
c
peroxide alone and that treated with the metal was not significant The difference between the 8-OHdG formation treated with the mix-
(p > 0.05, Mann–Witney test). ture of two ions and those calculated by the sum of the 8-OHdG forma-
j
The values are the average and standard deviation (n = 7) and tion treated with each single ions was significant (p < 0.05, Mann–Witney
calculated the dG concentration in untreated DNA as 100%. test).
d
k
The values are the average and standard deviation (n = 3) and calcu- () Suppressive effect (ratio < 1, p < 0.05).
e
lated the dG concentration in untreated DNA as 100%. The effect of interaction of metal ions was not evaluated.
f
l
The values are the average and standard deviation (n = 4) and The difference between the 8-OHdG formation treated with the mix-
calculated the dG concentration in untreated DNA as 100%. ture of two ions and those calculated by the sum of the 8-OHdG forma-
m
The values are the average and standard deviation (n = 5) and calcu- tion treated with each single ions was not significant (p > 0.05, Mann–
lated the dG concentration in untreated DNA as 100%. Witney test).
g
n
The values are the average and standard deviation (n = 6) and (+) Additive effect (p > 0.05).
h
calculated the dG concentration in untreated DNA as 100%. (·) Synergistic effect (ratio >1, p < 0.05).
H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44 39

each single ions (denominator in Eq. (1)) were evaluated Table 3


using Mann–Whitney test. As to the denominator in Eq. The formation of 8-OHdG through Cu (II) plus Cr (III) Fenton reaction
(1), the 8-OHdG formation with each single ion were Concentration 8-OHdG per 10e4 Ratio Recovery of dG
summed for every pairs of the values of 8-OHdG formation (mM) dGa (%)b
treated with metals A and B, and their average and stan- Cu Cr
dard deviation are calculated. The relationship between 0.010 0 180 ± 40c – 53 ± 9.0d
the values of ratios and influences of the interaction of me- 0.010 0.010 220 ± 17 1.2 ± 0.21e,f 58 ± 5.0
tal ions is defined as follows: p < 0.05 (the 8-OHdG forma- 0.010 0.020 356 ± 53 1.6 ± 0.36 (·)g,h 44 ± 12
0.010 0.050 405 ± 110 1.6 ± 0.42 (·)g 50 ± 6.0
tion treated with the mixture of two ions and that 0.010 0.10 400 ± 200 1.5 ± 0.64f 55 ± 10
calculated by the sum of the 8-OHdG formation with each 0.10 0.10 620 ± 93 2.3 ± 0.57 (·)g
single ions is significantly different.), and the average of the 0 0.010 14 ± 2.5 – 73 ± 16
ratio < 1; suppressive effect, p > 0.05; additive effect, 0 0.020 50 ± 27 – 75 ± 18
p < 0.05 and the average of the ratio >1; synergistic effect. 0 0.050 82 ± 7.6 – 62 ± 19
0 0.10 87 ± 23 – 74 ± 4.0
The influence of interaction of metal ions were not evalu-
a
ated, when the 8-OHdG level in DNA treated with both The values are the number of 8-OHdG per 10e4 of unmodified
deoxyguanosine.
or either metal ions were not significantly different from b
The recovery of deoxyguanosine are calculated by the equation as
those of control (Table 1), and the difference between the follow: recovery (%) = (dG concentration under the metal concentration/
values of the numerator and those of the denominator in dG concentration without addition of metal and H2O2) · 100.
c
Eq. (1) were not significant (p > 0.05). The values are the average and the standard deviation (n = 3).
d
Fig. 1 shows the changes of the formation of 8-OHdG The values are the average and standard deviation (n = 3) and calcu-
lated the dG concentration in untreated DNA at the same batch as 100%.
by mixing metal ions for Fe (II) plus Cd (II), Fe (II) plus e
The values (average and standard deviation) are calculated by Eq. (1).
Cr (III) and Cu (II) plus Cr (III) at 0.10 mM. Additions f
The difference between the 8-OHdG formation treated with the mix-
of Cd (II) and Ni (II) ion (0.10 mM) showed suppressive ture of Cu(II) and Cr(III) and those calculated by the sum of the 8-OHdG
effects on Fenton-type reaction induced by other metal formation treated with each single ions was not significant (p > 0.05,
ions. In the case of Fe (II) and Cu (II) mixture Mann–Witney test).
g
The difference between the 8-OHdG formation treated with the mix-
(0.10 mM), a suppressive effect on the formation of 8- ture of Cu(II) and Cr(III) and those calculated by the sum of the 8-OHdG
OHdG was observed. The pair of Cr (III) and Cu (II) formation treated with each single ions was significant (p < 0.05, Mann–
shows a synergistic effect on the formation of 8-OHdG at Witney test).
h
0.10 mM. (·) Synergistic effect.
Next, the Cu (II) plus Cr (III) Fenton-type reaction at
several concentrations was observed (the concentration of formation in DNA by Fenton-type reactions with Cu (II)
Cu was set at 0.010 mM). Table 3 summarizes 8-OHdG and Cr (III) ions, singly and as mixtures. The effects of

Fig. 1. 8-OHdG level in the DNA of salmon sperm treated with Fenton-type reactions at 0.1 mM. (a) Fe (II) and Cd (II), (b) Fe (II) and Cr (III), (c) Cu
(II) and Cr (III).
40 H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44

mixing Cu (II) (0.010 mM) and Cr (III) ions (0.02 and linear DNA by a double-strand break. Extensive double-
0.05 mM) on the formation of 8-OHdG showed a synergis- strand breakages lead to DNA degradation. These effects
tic effect (maximum 1.6 times for Cu (II) at 0.010 mM and can be monitored by gel electrophoresis. The migration
Cr (III) at 0.05 mM). The results showed a mixture of Cu pattern of a plasmid under the gel electrophoresis condi-
(II) and Cr (III) shows synergistic influence on the forma- tions is: supercoiled > linear > open circular DNA. Hence
tion of 8-OHdG under various ratio of Cu (II)/Cr (III). analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis yields information
regarding the type of strand breakage occurring in each
3.2. Generation of single- and double-strand breaks in DNA Fenton-type reaction by separation of the different confor-
mations of plasmid DNA (Fig. 2).
Strand break induction in DNA can be monitored using Table 4 summarizes the results of an incubation of plas-
supercoiled plasmid DNA. The double-stranded SK+ plas- mid DNA with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a sin-
mid exists in a tightly compact supercoiled conformation in gle metal ion or a mixture of two ions. With 0.4 lM metal
its native form, and as such it has a relatively high electro- ion, over 85% of the DNA remained supercoiled, as in the
phoretic mobility. When treated with an agent that induces absence of metal ion (p > 0.05), except in two cases: with Fe
DNA strand breaks, supercoiled DNA is converted to the (II) (where 25% became open circular) and Fe (II) plus Cu
open-circle conformation by a single-strand break and to (II) (where 21% became open circular). With 4.0 lM metal

Fig. 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of SK+ plasmid DNA following treatment with Fenton-type reactions by mixtures of metal ions at 4.0 lM.

Table 4
SK+ DNA strand breaks mediated by Fenton-type reaction
0.40 lM 4.0 lM
Supercoiled (%) Linear (%) Open circular (%) Supercoiled (%) Linear (%) Open circular (%)
Untreateda 96 ± 3.0 0.68 ± 1.5 3.0 ± 2.3 96 ± 3.0 0.68 ± 1.5 3.0 ± 2.3
H2O2 onlya 96 ± 3.5 2.1 ± 2.1 2.2 ± 2.3 96 ± 3.5 2.1 ± 2.1 2.2 ± 2.3
Feb 74 ± 2.0c 1.2 ± 1.2d 25 ± 1.7c 39 ± 2.5c 3.4 ± 2.3 57 ± 3.5c
Cdb 95 ± 4.0d 0.86 ± 1.0d 4.5 ± 3.6d 95 ± 4.0d 0.9 ± 1.0 4.5 ± 3.6d
Nib 94 ± 4.0d 0.54 ± 0.48d 5.3 ± 3.7d 93 ± 1.2d 1.0 ± 0.12 6.5 ± 0.95c
Crb 91 ± 5.0d 1.7 ± 1.9d 7.5 ± 4.3d 73 ± 4.0c 2.2 ± 0.42 25 ± 4.0c
Cub 91 ± 1.2d 2.0 ± 1.2d 6.8 ± 0.32c 87 ± 2.6c 1.4 ± 1.2 12 ± 3.7d
Fe + Cdb 94 ± 4.0d 2.6 ± 2.4d 3.6 ± 3.2d 47 ± 2.6c 1.1 ± 0.66d 52 ± 3.8c
Fe + Nib 89 ± 11d 2.6 ± 3.0d 8.5 ± 8.3d 50 ± 3.6c 1.4 ± 0.68d 48 ± 2.5c
Fe + Crb 92 ± 6.7d 0.77 ± 0.86d 7.5 ± 5.7d 42 ± 5.5c 11 ± 4.4c 47 ± 1.2c
Fe + Cub 79 ± 16c 1.1 ± 0.57d 21 ± 17c 45 ± 1.5c 5.5 ± 0.87c 49 ± 1.7c
Cd + Nib 94 ± 1.5d 1.4 ± 0.78d 4.4 ± 0.87d 85 ± 0.58c 3.8 ± 2.0d 10 ± 0.72c
Cd + Crb 91 ± 7.2d 0.40 ± 0.70d 8.3 ± 6.1d 86 ± 4.0c 1.6 ± 0.78d 13 ± 3.2c
Cd + Cub 95 ± 3.5d 0.40 ± 0.61d 4.4 ± 2.9d 95 ± 1.0d 0.80 ± 0.70d 4.0 ± 0.76d
Ni + Crb 93 ± 4.6d 0.43 ± 0.75d 6.2 ± 3.4d 80 ± 2.6c 2.0 ± 0.62d 18 ± 2.6c
Ni + Cub 95 ± 2.5d 0.90 ± 1.1d 3.9 ± 3.6d 89 ± 2.3c 2.0 ± 1.5d 9.5 ± 0.55c
Cr + Cub 96 ± 2.6d 0.63 ± 1.1d 3.5 ± 3.5d 77 ± 3.5c 2.8 ± 0.38d 20 ± 2.9c
a
Mean value and standard deviation (n = 5).
b
Mean value and standard deviation (n = 3).
c
The difference between the percentage of SK + DNA strand breaks treated with hydrogen peroxide alone and that treated with the metal was
significant (p < 0.05, Mann–Witney test).
d
The difference between the percentage of DNA strand breaks treated with hydrogen peroxide alone and that treated with the metal was not significant
(p > 0.05, Mann–Witney test).
H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44 41

ion, however, conversion to open circular DNA was at tested using Mann–Whitney test. As to the denominator in
least 10% in all the incubations containing Fe (II) and Cr Eq. (3), the percentages treated with each single ion were
(III). Conversion to linear DNA by double-strand break- summed for every pairs of the values of 8-OHdG formation
age was negligible except with 4.0 lM Fe (II) plus Cr treated with metal A and B, and their average and standard
(III) and Fe (II) plus Cu (II), when it was 11% and 5.5%. deviation are calculated. In the same way as the formation
The difference between the percentages of linear form trea- of 8-OHdG, the relationships between the values of ratios
ted with these metal ions and those treated with peroxide and influences of the interaction between metal ions is
only was significant (p < 0.05). defined as follows: p < 0.05, and the average of the ratio
The percentage of DNA strand breaks (break/plasmid) < 1; suppressive effect, p > 0.05; additive effect, p < 0.05
was calculated by Eq. (2). and the average of the ratio >1; synergistic effect. The
effects of a mixture of metal ions at 0.40 lM (except for
break=plasmid ¼ ln ðsupercoiled ð%Þ=100Þ ð2Þ Fe (II) plus Cu (II), Ni (II) plus Cu (II) and Cr (III) plus
Cu (II)) were not evaluated, because the percentage of
The influence of the interaction of metal ions on the break/plasmid treated with both or either metal ions were
strand breaks in DNA was evaluated by Eq. (3), and the not significantly different from those of control, and the
results are summarized in Table 5. values of the numerator and those of the denominator in
Eq. (3) were not significant (p > 0.05).
ðbreak=plasmidÞmetal A plus B
Ratio ¼ The calculated values of ratio, except for Fe (II) plus Cr
ðbreak=plasmidÞmetal A þ ðbreak=plasmidÞmetal B  ðbreak=plasmidÞuntreated
ð3Þ (III) and Fe (II) plus Cu (II) at 4.0 lM, reflect the effects of
mixing metal ions on single-strand break formation in
The difference between the percentage of break/plasmid DNA, because significant double-strand breaks in DNA
treated with the mixture of two metal ions (numerator in were not observed by the Fenton-type reactions. Most
Eq. (3)) and those calculated by the sum of the percentages cases (at 4.0 lM) showed the suppressive effects of the
treated with each single ions (denominator in Eq. (3)) were interaction of metal ions on DNA strand breaks.

Table 5
Effects of mixing metal ions on strand breaks in DNA
0.40 lM 4.0 lM
a b
Break/plasmid Ratio Break/plasmid Ratio
Untreated 0.037 ± 0.031 – 0.037 ± 0.031 –
H2O2 only 0.046 ± 0.037 – 0.046 ± 0.037 –
Fe 0.30 ± 0.027c – 0.93 ± 0.064c –
Cd 0.055 ± 0.043d – 0.055 ± 0.043c –
Ni 0.062 ± 0.043d – 0.076 ± 0.012d –
Cr 0.099 ± 0.055d – 0.32 ± 0.055c –
Cu 0.091 ± 0.013c – 0.14 ± 0.030c –
Fe + Cd 0.066 ± 0.042 0.21 ± 0.12 ()e,f 0.76 ± 0.057 0.80 ± 0.073 ()f
Fe + Ni 0.12 ± 0.13 0.38 ± 0.34 ()f 0.70 ± 0.073 0.72 ± 0.075 ()f
Fe + Cr 0.089 ± 0.074 0.26 ± 0.19 ()f 0.88 ± 0.13 0.73 ± 0.075 ()f
Fe + Cu 0.26 ± 0.22 0.72 ± 0.52 (+)g,h 0.79 ± 0.034 0.77 ± 0.052 ()f
Cd + Ni 0.058 ± 0.016 0.17 ± 2.9i 0.17 ± 0.0068 2.2 ± 1.1(·)f,j
Cd + Cr 0.096 ± 0.081 1.6 ± 2.8i 0.15 ± 0.047 0.46 ± 0.15 ()f
i
Cd + Cu 0.048 ± 0.026 0.53 ± 0.42 0.051 ± 0.011 0.36 ± 0.14 ()f
Ni + Cr 0.073 ± 0.050 0.88 ± 1.1i 0.22 ± 0.033 0.64 ± 0.12 ()f
Ni + Cu 0.048 ± 0.026 0.46 ± 0.28 ()f 0.12 ± 0.026 0.70 ± 0.17 ()f
Cr + Cu 0.041 ± 0.028 0.30 ± 0.21 ()f 0.26 ± 0.044 0.64 ± 0.12 ()f
a
The values are calculated according to Eq. (2).
b
The values (average and standard deviation) are calculated by Eq. (3).
c
The difference between the percentages of break/plasmid treated with hydrogen peroxide alone and those treated the metal ion was significant
(p < 0.05, Mann–Witney test).
d
The difference between the percentages of break/plasmid treated with hydrogen peroxide alone and those treated the metal ion was not significant
(p > 0.05, Mann–Witney test).
e
() Suppressive effect.
f
The difference between the percentages of break/plasmid treated with the mixture of two ions and those calculated by the sum of the percentages
treated with each single ions was significant (p < 0.05, Mann–Witney test).
g
(+) Additive effect.
h
The difference between the percentages of break/plasmid treated with the mixture of two ions and those calculated by the sum of the percentages
treated with each single ions was not significant (p > 0.05, Mann–Witney test).
i
The effect of interaction of metal ions was not evaluated.
j
(·) Synergistic effect.
42 H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44

4. Discussion Ni (II) and Cr (III) at 0.010 mM and Cd (II) and Ni (II) at


0.10 mM did not generate levels of 8-OHdG that were sig-
4.1. Formation of 8-OHdG by Fenton-type reaction nificantly higher than the yield found in DNA treated with
hydrogen peroxide alone (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test).
In order to confirm the hypothesis that the interaction of The reason may be that there is no formation of ROS by
metal ions with DNA influences DNA oxidative stress via a the Cd (II) and Ni (II) Fenton-type reaction, because Cd
Fenton-type reaction, we examined the ability of mixtures (II) and Ni (II) ions do not mediate the electron transfer
of two of five metal ions, Fe (II), Cd (II), Ni (II), Cr (III) to hydrogen peroxide. Mikhailova et al. reported that Cd
or Cu (II) to induce the formation of 8-OHdG in DNA, (II) induced the formation of 8-OHdG in human lympho-
an important oxidative DNA adduct leading to mutagene- blastoid cells (Mikhailova et al., 1997). The result could
sis and carcinogenesis. First, the formation of 8-OHdG be due not to the formation of ROS by Cd (II) but to
mediated by a Fenton-type reaction of the single metal the influence of Cd (II) on the DNA repair system (Wang
ion with DNA was observed. When the concentration of et al., 2004).
Fe (II) and Cr (III) was at 1.0 mM, the peak of dG was Next, we studied the formation of 8-OHdG mediated by
not detected (the detection limit of injected dG calculated the Fenton-type reaction with a mixture of metal ions.
as three times the baseline noise was 0.5 nmol, and the Effects on the formation of 8-OHdG by mixing metal ions
recovery (%) of dG was about 0.5%). This result was likely were observed, and depend on the kind of the pair of metal
due to the extensive DNA strand breakage by the Fenton- ions (Fig. 1).
type reactions at 1.0 mM. For the comparison with the Additions of Cd (II) and Ni (II) ion (0.10 mM) showed
Fenton-type reaction between mixing metal ion and suppressive effects on Fenton-type reaction induced by
DNA, it was thought that the recoveries of dG would need other metal ions, except for the case of Cr (III) plus Ni
to be higher (i.e. >5%). Then, the concentrations of metal (II). It was reported that Cd (II) interacts with guanine
ions were set at 0.010 and 0.10 mM, and the recovery of bases (Moriwaki, 2003). In addition, it is well known that
dG and the formation of 8-OHdG through the Fenton- Ni (II) ion interacts with DNA phosphate group and the
type reaction were observed (Table 1). At 0.010 or interaction stabilizes the structure of DNA (Eichhorn and
0.10 mM, the recoveries of dG were over 5% under all con- Shin, 1968). Furthermore, these ions do not form OH rad-
ditions. The highest yield of 8-OHdG through the Fenton- ical with hydrogen peroxide. Therefore, it is thought that
type reaction of the single metal ion was obtained following the interaction of Cd (II) or Ni (II) with DNA will suppress
treatment of DNA with the Fe (II) Fenton reaction (250 DNA oxidation by Fe (II), Cu (II) and Cr (III) by interfer-
per 104 dG at 0.10 mM), followed by Cu (II) (200) and ing with their interaction with DNA.
Cr (III) (87). There is a tendency that the formation of 8- In the case of Fe (II) plus Cu (II) mixture (0.010 mM),
OHdG at 0.10 mM of the metal concentration was higher an additive effect on the formation of 8-OHdG was
than that of at 0.010 mM in every case for the Fe (II), observed. In contrast, Fe (II) plus Cu (II) Fenton-type
Cu (II) and Cr (III) Fenton-type reaction. It is well known reaction at 0.10 mM showed a suppressive effect. Fe and
that the Cu (II) Fenton-type reaction proceeds through the Cu ions interact with DNA bases. Therefore, the competi-
electron transfer reaction as shown in Eqs. (4)–(6) (Perez- tion of the interactions between DNA base and metal ions
Benito, 2004). would make a suppressive effect on 8-OHdG formation at
0.10 mM.
Cu ðIIÞ þ H2 O2 ! CuOOHþ þ Hþ ð4Þ The Fe (II) plus Cr (III) Fenton-type reaction
þ
CuOOH ! Cu ðIÞ þ O
2 þH þ
ð5Þ (0.10 mM) shows an additive effect on the formation of
  8-OHdG. This result suggests that Fe (II) and Cr (III)
Cu ðIÞ þ H2 O2 ! Cu ðIIÞ þ OH þ OH ð6Þ
interact with different sites in DNA, and independently oxi-
Cu (II) ion can interact strongly with DNA (Eichhorn dize DNA through Fenton-type reaction. In fact, it was
and Shin, 1968). Therefore, the Cu (II) Fenton-type reac- reported that Cr (III) interacts with both base and phos-
tion with DNA would be influenced by the interaction phate groups of DNA, and Fe interacts with DNA bases
between copper ion and DNA. The difference between (Eichhorn and Shin, 1968; Levina et al., 2001).
the recoveries of dG through Cu (II) Fenton-type reaction The pair of Cr (III) and Cu (II) shows a synergistic effect
and those treated peroxide only was significant (p < 0.05, on the formation of 8-OHdG at 0.10 mM. In the case of the
Mann–Whitney test). In addition, the recoveries of dG Cu (II) plus Cr (III) Fenton-type reaction at 0.010 mM, an
through the Cu (II) Fenton-type reaction with DNA additive effect, not a synergistic effect, was observed. The
(53% at 0.010 mM, 5.1% at 0.10 mM) were low compared Cu (II) and Cr (III) Fenton-type reaction at other concen-
to those by the Fenton-type reactions of the other metal trations (the concentration of Cu was set at 0.010 mM)
ions. The results could be due to the DNA strand breakage showed a synergistic effect on the formation of 8-OHdG
induced by the Cu (II) Fenton-type reaction or the influ- (Table 3). Cu (II) has been proposed to generate OH radi-
ence of Cu (II) ion on the precipitation of DNA. cal through the Fenton-type reaction (Eqs. (4) and (5)).
On the other hand, in the case of the Fenton-type reac- The preferential binding of Cu (I) to the N7 guanine would
tions by single metal ion, treatment of DNA with Cd (II), result in the formation of 8-OHdG.
H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44 43

It was reported by Lay et al. that Cr (V) species are observed. The results suggested that the interaction
interacted DNA and highly reactive intermediates, Cr between DNA and metal ion was influenced on DNA oxi-
(VI), induced oxidative damage of DNA (Pattison et al., dative stress, and a site-specific mechanism is involved in
2001). Therefore, a synergistic effect of the mixture of Cu the formation of 8-OHdG, while the formation of single-
(II) plus Cr (III) ion would be due to the electron transfer strand breaks is more likely to involve generation of hydro-
between formed Cu (I) and Cr (VI) to generate Cr (V) (Eqs. xyl radicals in solution. Therefore, influence of mixing
(6)–(8)). metal ions on the formation of 8-OHdG would be due to
the change of the interactions between DNA and metal
Cr ðIIIÞ þ 3H2 O2 ! Cr ðVIÞ þ 3OH þ 3OH ð7Þ
ions, while that of single-strand breaks would owed the
Cu ðIÞ þ Cr ðVIÞ ! Cu ðIIÞ þ Cr ðVÞ ð8Þ change of reactivity between DNA and the formed hydroxy
radical in solution. The difference of the mechanisms would
The Cr (V) ion from the electron transfer reaction can
cause the several inconsistency of the influence of mixing
undergo Fenton-type reaction with hydrogen peroxide
metal ions on strand breaks in DNA and on the formation
(Eq. (9)), and the electron transfer reaction to form Cr
of 8-OHdG.
(V) would accelerate the formation of 8-OHdG.
The case of the Cd (II) plus Ni (II) Fenton-type reaction
Cr ðVÞ þ H2 O2 ! Cr ðVIÞ þ OH þ OH ð9Þ at 4.0 lM with DNA showed the synergistic effect. The
mechanism is not clear at this stage. The reaction between
There are several examples that the presence of reducing the plasmid and the OH radical formed by reactions other
agent, such as o-quinone and benz[a]anthracene dihydrodi- than Fenton-type reaction may be accelerated by the inter-
ols, activates DNA oxidative stress induced by Cu (II) action between the DNA and Cd (II) plus Ni (II).
(Flowers et al., 1997; Seike et al., 2004). Furthermore, the In the case of the Fe (II) plus Cr (III) Fenton-type
electron transfer between copper and chromium ion in reaction with DNA, the percentage of the linear form,
the presence of hydrogen peroxide has been reported containing double-strand breaks in DNA, was increased
(Perez-Benito and Arias, 1999). In view of these facts, the compared to those of the single Fe (II) or Cr (III) Fen-
synergistic effect would be induced by the interaction ton-type reaction (Table 4). However, the difference
between Cu (II), Cr (III), Cr (V), and DNA and electron between the percentage of linear form treated with Fe
transfer between Cu, Cr, and hydrogen peroxide. (II) plus Cr (III) and the sum of the percentages of linear
Consideration of these synergistic effects is needed for form treated Fe (II) and Cr (III) was not statistically sig-
evaluating the risk of pollution from plating industries, nificant (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). It was reported
because metal plating wastes often contain copper and that double-strand breaks in DNA through a Fenton-type
chromium together (Vijay and Sihorwala, 2003). reaction was related to the interaction between metal ion,
such as iron, and DNA (Lloyd and Phillips, 1999). For-
4.2. DNA strand breaks mation of linear form SK+ plasmid would be initiated
by the interaction between DNA and two metal ions. Lin-
In order to observe single- and double-strand breaks in ear DNA could result from the formation of a true dou-
DNA by Fenton-type reaction with a mixture of two kinds ble-strand break (i.e., scission of both strands of DNA in
of metal ions, pBluescript K+ plasmid was incubated with one single event). It might also be due to the formation of
hydrogen peroxide and mixtures of two kinds of metal many single-strand breaks such that two are formed inde-
ions. The concentration of metal ions were set at 0.40 pendently but closely on opposing strands. Therefore,
and 4.0 lM conforming to the ratio between DNA and there is a possibility that the formation of ROS was
heavy metal in 8-OHdG study. The single-strand breaks increased by mixing Fe (II) and Cr (III), and that influ-
in DNA through Fenton- type reactions of single metal enced the formation of the linear DNA.
ions at 0.40 lM (Cd (II), Ni (II), Cr (III) and Cu (II)) In summary, we have demonstrated effects of mixing
and 4.0 lM (Cd (II) and Ni (II)) were similar to that occur- metal ions on oxidative DNA damage, the formation of
ring with peroxide only (p > 0.05, Table 4). Double-strand 8-OHdG and single- and double-strand breaks in DNA,
breaks in DNA were not observed except for the Fe (II) mediated by a Fenton-type reduction, and found interac-
plus Cr (III) and Fe (II) plus Cu (II) Fenton-type reaction tions between metal ions had various influences (suppres-
at 4.0 lM. The percentages of the linear form under other sive, additive and synergistic effects) on DNA oxidative
conditions were similar to that of blank. stress. The in vitro tests in this study showed the model
Most cases (at 4.0 lM) showed the suppressive effects of of DNA reaction with activated oxygen species. However,
the interaction of metal ions on DNA strand breaks. There it is noted that the models used in this study do not reflect
were some cases that the influences of the interaction of DNA structures in cell and the interactions between metal
metal ions on strand breaks in DNA were different from ions and proteins in chromatin. It is well known that these
those on the formation of 8-OHdG (For example, Fe (II) factors influence on DNA oxidative stresses by metal ions
plus Cr (III), Cd (II) plus Ni (II) and Cr (III) plus Cu (Kasprzak et al., 2003), and next step of this study is to
(II) in Tables 2 and 3). In an earlier study (Lloyd and Phil- evaluate the effects of mixing metal ions on DNA oxidative
lips, 1999), Fenton-type reactions with EDTA were stress by in vivo system.
44 H. Moriwaki et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 22 (2008) 36–44

Acknowledgements Nygren, O., Niesson, C.-A., Lindahi, R., 1992. Occupational exposure to
chromium, copper and arsenic during work with impregnated wood in
joinery shops. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 36, 509–517.
H.M. thanks the Section of Molecular Carcinogenesis at O’Brien, T., Mandel, G., Bitchard, D.I., Patierno, S.R., 2002. Critical role
the Institute of Cancer Research for receiving him as a vis- of chromium (Cr)-DNA interactions in the formation of Cr-induced
iting researcher from September 2004 to September 2005. polymerase arresting lesion. Biochemistry 41, 12529–12537.
Supported by Cancer Research UK. Olinski, R., Gackowski, D., Foksinski, M., Rozalski, R., Roszkowski, K.,
Jaruga, P., 2002. Oxidative DNA damage: assessment of the role in
carcinogenesis, atherosclerosis, and acquired immunodeficiency syn-
References drome. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 33 (2), 192–200.
Pattison, D.I., Davies, M.J., Levina, A., Dixon, N.E., Lay, P.A., 2001.
Barja, G., 2004. Free radicals and aging. Trends Neurosci. 27 (10), 595– Chromium(VI) reduction by catechol(amine)s results in DNA cleavage
600. in vitro: relevance to chromium genotoxicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14
Bjelland, S., Seeberg, E., 2003. Mutagenicity, toxicity and repair of (5), 500–510.
DNA base damage induced by oxidation. Mutat. Res. 531 (1–2), 37– Perez-Benito, J.F., 2004. Reaction pathways in the decomposition of
80. hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by copper (II). J. Inorg. Biochem. 98,
Cui, Y., Zhu, Y.-G., Zhai, R., Huang, Y., Qiu, Y., Liang, J., 2005. 430–438.
Exposure to metal mixtures and human health impacts in a contam- Perez-Benito, J.F., Arias, C., 1999. Mutual catalyst inhibition in the
inated area in Nanning, China. China Environ. Int. 31, 784–790. chromium (VI)–copper (II)–hydrogen peroxide reacting system. New.
Eichhorn, G.L., Shin, Y.A., 1968. Interaction of metal ion with J. Chem. 23 (9), 945–949.
polynucleotides and related compounds XII. The relative effect of Prahalad, A.K., Inmon, J., Dailey, L.A., Madden, M.C., Ghio, A.J.,
various metal ions on DNA helicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 7323– Gallagher, E., 2001. Air pollution particles mediated oxidative DNA
7328. base damage in a cell free system and in human airway epithelial cells
Ercal, N., Gurer-Orhan, H., Aykin-Burns, N., 2001. Toxic metals and in relation to particulate metal content and bioreactivity. Chem. Res.
oxidative stress part I: mechanisms involved in metal-induced oxida- Toxicol. 14, 879–887.
tive damage. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 1, 529–539. Qi, W., Reiter, R.J., Tan, D.X., Garcia, J.J., Manchester, L.C., Karbow-
Feig, D.I., Reid, T.M., Loeb, L.A., 1994. Reactive oxygen species in nik, M., Calvo, J.R., 2000. Chromium(III)-induced 8-hydro-
tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 54, 1890s–1894s. xydeoxyguanosine in DNA and its reduction by antioxidants:
Flowers, L., Ohnishi, T., Penning, T.M., 1997. DNA strand scission by comparative effects of melatonin, ascorbate, and vitamin E. Environ.
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones: role of reactive oxygen Health Perspect. 108 (5), 399–402.
species Cu (II)/Cu (I) redox cycling, and o-semiquinone anion radicals. Risom, L., Dybdahl, M., Bornholdt, J., Vogel, U., Wallin, H., Moller, P.,
Biochemistry 36, 8640–8648. Loft, S., 2003. Oxidative DNA damage and defence gene expression in
Glei, M., Latunde-Dada, G.O., Klinder, A., Becker, T.W., Hermann, U., the mouse lung after short-term exposure to diesel exhaust particles by
Voigt, K., Pool-Zobel, B.L., 2002. Iron-overload induces oxidative inhalation. Carcinogenesis 24 (11), 1847–1852.
DNA damage in the human colon carcinoma cell line HT29 clone 19A. Seike, K., Murata, M., Hirakawa, K., Deyashiki, Y., Kawanishi, S., 2004.
Mutat. Res. 519 (1–2), 151–161. Oxidative DNA damage induced by benzo[a] anthracene dihydrodiols
Hirano, S., Furuyama, A., Koike, E., Kobayashi, T., 2003. Oxidative- in the presence of dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17,
stress potency of organic extracts of diesel exhaust and urban fine 1445–1451.
particles in rat heart microvessel endothelial cells. Toxicology 187 (2– Shi, H., Hudson, L.G., Liu, K.J., 2004. Oxidative stress and apoptosis in
3), 161–170. metal ion-induced carcinogenesis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 37 (5), 582–
Kasprzak, K.S., Bal, W., Karaczyn, A.A., 2003. The role of chromatin 593.
damage in nickel-induced carcinogenesis. J. Environ. Monit. 5, 183– Sugden, K.D., Rigby, K.M., Martin, B.D., 2004. Oxidative activation of
187. the human carcinogen chromate by arsenite: a model for synergistic
Lee, D.H., O’Connor, T.R., Pfeifer, G.P., 2002. Oxidative DNA damage metal activation leading to oxidative DNA damage. Toxicol. In Vitro.
induced by copper and hydrogen peroxide promotes CG–>TT tandem 18 (6), 741–748.
mutations at methylated CpG dinucleotides in nucleotide excision Tenopoulou, M., Doulias, P.T., Barbouti, A., Brunk, U., Galaris, D.,
repair-deficient cells. Nucl. Acids Res. 30 (16), 3566–3573. 2005. Role of compartmentalized redox-active iron in hydrogen
Levina, A., Lay, P.A., Dixon, N.E., 2001. Disproportionation of a model peroxide-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. Biochem. J. 387 (Pt.
chromium (V) complex causes extensive chromium (III) DNA binding 3), 703–710.
in vitro. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14, 946–950. Tsurudome, Y., Hirano, T., Yamato, H., Tanaka, I., Sagai, M., Hirano,
Lloyd, D.R., Phillips, D.H., 1999. Oxidative DNA damage mediated by H., Nagata, N., Itoh, H., Kasai, H., 1999. Changes in levels of 8-
copper(II), iron(II) and nickel(II) Fenton reactions: evidence for site- hydroxyguanine in DNA, its repair and OGG1 mRNA in rat lungs
specific mechanisms in the formation of double-strand breaks, 8- after intratracheal administration of diesel exhaust particles. Carcino-
hydroxydeoxyguanosine and putative intrastrand cross-links. Mutat. genesis 20 (8), 1573–1576.
Res. 424 (1–2), 23–36. Vijay, R., Sihorwala, T.A., 2003. Identification and leaching characteris-
Mikhailova, M.V., Littlefield, N.A., Hass, B.S., Poirier, L.A., Chou, tics of sludge generated from metal pickling and electroplating
M.W., 1997. Cadmium-induced 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine formation, industries by toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP).
DNA strand breaks and antioxidant enzyme activities in lymphoblas- Environ. Monit. Assess. 84 (3), 193–202.
toid cells. Cancer Lett. 115, 141–148. Wang, Y., Fang, J., Leonard, S.S., Rao, M.K., 2004. Cadmium inhibits
Moriwaki, H., 2003. Complexes of cadmium ion with guanine bases the electron transfer chain and induces reactive oxygen species. Free
detected by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spec- Radic. Biol. Med. 36, 1434–1443.
trom. 38, 321–327.

You might also like