Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Imagine if vaccines weren’t tested on humans, is it still possible to develop a cure without

sacrificing ethical standards when it comes to human experimentation? As we all know, the development

of vaccines had a long history of trials and errors which were not only delimited to animal

experimentation but as well as using humans as the subject of experiments. If you must say that it is

rather justifiable, do you think it is necessary to risk a few human lives for the sake of many? Can you

still openly accept these vaccines knowing the background and consequences of using such method? Do

you really think that the end would justify the means? Testing vaccines on humans, making them go

through the dangers of trials that the process involves, are humans becoming mere test subjects? Are

humans, mere experimental subjects as of that animals, which, during countless decades were also

exploited with their lives being disregarded? If someone asked you to gamble your life for a cure with no

definite outcome, would you do it? Your life, in exchange for many, would you do it? Presented with no

other options but to find a cure for species similar to your own, are you willing to take the challenge?

Would you be a hero? Or would you rather be prudent with your decisions? The thing is, there is no

guarantee. You’ll either make it or break within the process. What would you choose? Your decision

would determine the future of humanity.

You might also like